2024-01-23 Scott Bennett Dr. James Fetzer: Trump/Tucker The Winning Ticket. Global Freedom TV
Summary
Transcript
Blessed be the Lord, my strength, who teacheth my hands to war and my fingers to fight. I’m Scott Bennet. This is greatawakenings on globalfreedomtv. com. We thank you for joining us tonight. We encourage you to go to our website, globalfreedomtv. com, and also destroy cancer. One of the things we’re going to be unraveling and giving to people is the constitutional law enforcement intellectual diet that we’ve got up on the website.
Constitutional law enforcement, constitutional knowledge of rights, constitutional legal actions through affidavits, a whole litany of encyclopedic teaching on affirming your rights through legal declarations, legal narratives, legal presentations, lawful constitutional language. So go to the constitutional law enforcement page up on globalfreedomtv. com and you’ll see the links there. And we want to encourage you to study that, Jim, it’s wonderful to have you on the great Dr. James Fetcher.
We’re going to be exploring a variety of subjects to open us up and to set the general direction, the true north compass setting. As you and I have talked about, Jim, in the last few days, I’ve had sort of an epiphany. I’ve kind of seen something and I’ve begun to publicize it. But this is the first time we’ve done it on a show, and we’re going to make that known and we’ll talk about it.
But it struck me, Jim, from all of my years in the federal government, in the military, as a Psyop guy, as a State Department guy, as a Bush administration guy, as heritage, as someone who’s been in Washington for over 14 years, it struck me that the political inclination of this country in the coming year is going to take on a direction and a character that we’ve never had before, not even one.
Donald Trump was elected. But since Donald Trump was elected, he set the threshold, he set the precedent of a man who’s never run for anything other than president, a billionaire, a wealthy capitalist, a real estate investor, a man who’s got multiple kids from different wives, and has been very successful, sort of a playboy in his earlier days, and has now risen up to be the president of the United States for good or bad.
And I think the majority of it’s good. But now we’re seeing after Trump was expelled, the coup d’eta, the election fraud that cast him out because no one was standing up to help him. We’ve seen the country run aboard the reef, or run across the reef and rip out the belly of this country. Belly of our ship, our dollar has been totally weakened and devalued, our borders have been thrown open, and millions upon millions upon millions of foreign invaders with the sense of a hedgehog and the cleanliness of just a garbage pale dog have come into the country.
And we’ve got endless wars. Now we’ve got war in Ukraine, despite the fact that everybody knows Ukraine, corruption, Biden, Barisma, Rosemont, Seneca 46, biolabs on and on and on and on and on. And the russian entrance to stop all of this. And now you’ve got Israel and Gaza and America getting its butt kicked on a small scale that’s going to get a lot worse if we try and ratchet it.
And it struck me that the best hope for a political renaissance in the United States is to carry people in a direction that builds upon Trump’s precedent of an outsider, of someone that is independent of the political corruption and the egoism and the narcissism and the selfishness which animates and defines most american politicians. And brings us back to a nostalgic 1970s remembrance of what America was. From Mayberry to Huckleberry Finn to an oshux to a Ronald Reagan reflection.
How do we do that? Trump sort of cracked the ice, but the full maneuver to go in this direction of a political renaissance, a political healing through a cathartic, a political moment, an affirmation of the will of the people, is through Donald Trump to make Tucker Carlson his vice president. Trump, Tucker, two outsiders, two non politicians. Tucker is the younger nephew of Trump. In a sense. There’s no competition.
They’re not going for the same know. One’s the older uncle and Tucker’s a younger guy. He’s only a couple years older than me. So Tucker represents a position where he can come alongside Donald Trump and help him and educate him and aid him and mentor him in a lot of the functionality and the knowledge that Tucker acquired when his father was working in government. And then Tucker carried that on in his journalistic experiences and his character, very pristine.
He’s been married to the one woman all his life, his school sweetheart, and has four daughters, and he’s never been to the military, so he’s not going to have violent exposure to him. But he understands the military from a theoretical point of view and from a certain degree, practical. I’m sure his father may have been in the military, but Tucker represents a nostalgic Huckleberry Finn straw hat, a natural, buoyant laughter and joy in just being Americans and taking our country back in this direction.
Now, over the past year or so, you’ve seen Tucker with a certain exasperation and a frustration and a worry and an outrage. But I think, Jim, all of that is going to soften and we’re going to realize we have to take the reins and guide our country out of this barrier, out of this reef, out of this skill and charibus whirlpool between Nikki Haley corporate endless wars and Joe Biden, the child molesting zombie.
And I think Tucker and Trump would be brilliant because Trump could serve his second term as a absolute successful first term as president. Tucker would mentor him and Trump would only get better and then Tucker would be vice president to then if the american people wanted, and I think they would, and I think Tucker would accept it, he would then be the president with two terms. And we would have twelve years, Jim, of healing, of cathartic, moving in a direction that we haven’t moved before.
And we had that under two terms of Reagan and one term of George Bush senior. Now, George Bush senior was a fool and a bastard and a demoniac and totally set up the country to ruin. But this is the opposite. We could have Ronald Reagan all over again with one term of Trump. And then, who knows, you could even make the argument that he could have two terms.
But let’s just say one term with Trump and then two terms with Tucker. And in that twelve years, we would have the greatest return to constitutional limitations, prosperity, happy family values, no wars. We would do an economic adjustment to reflect that the dollar is not going to be weaponized or leveraged. And you would see, I think, a renaissance that we have never had in this country ever. And I think Trump, Tucker, is the winning ticket to go.
I’ve put it through every computer system in my mind that I can, and I come back to, this is the winning maneuver. So I’ll end it there, Jim, and hand it back to you to get your response and your analysis and your thoughts on that before we jump into your presentation. Go ahead. JAMEs FETzer well, Scott, yes, I mean, the candidates that might come to mind would include Jim Jordan.
He’s a bulldog. I think he’s sensational and belongs in a Trump cabinet, if not as VP. Ron Johnson, senator from my state, the disadvantage, we have a very weak Democrat governor to be appointing his replacement, and he would not appoint a Republican. Then you have Kerry Lake out in Arizona and Christine Ohm in South Dakota. No woman. No women. No women. I’m just reviewing candidates, Scott, and I’m going to offer further thoughts of my own.
And today I actually discovered an interview with Donald Jr. Where he was explained why Nikki Haley under no circumstances, and Trump just defeated her tonight in New Hampshire. I’m going to discuss the margin because it was a massive effort to build up the Nikki Haley vote by bringing in democrats as independents to affect the outcome and thereby reduce the margin. But where Donald Jr. Was himself endorsing Tucker Carlson, and of course, Tucker is enormously popular.
And I think that were he still at Fox, this would not be a viable option. Honestly, I don’t think he would have distinguished himself in the ways that would count here. It would be seemingly too much cherry picking. But because Tucker got booted off of Fox and it was all completely wrong, and because Tucker is showing himself very agile and independent as an analyst of political matters, I wish he were a little better informed about conspiracies because there still seem to be quite a few of which he’s apparently unaware.
I do think it would be the most potent ticket. So I’m inclined to agree with you, Scott. Yeah. And his lack of knowledge on some of these deeper issues, the conspiratorial revelations of 911 or the USS liberty or other things, that’s acceptable and forgivable and understandable. In fact, in many ways, it’s laudatory because he is not putting himself in a position to have a spotlight put right on him and propaganda to be generated that would cause certain people to stay home or certain people to not vote for him.
If they can’t say, well, Tucker is a 911 denier or Tucker is an anti Israel guy because he’s not said nice things or whatever they try and throw at him. He is conveniently out of the spotlight because the only thing he’s going to choose and discuss and advance is what do the american people want? What do the american people want their government to do? What do the american people want for their money that they invest in government? What do the american people want with regards to the ideas that are generated out of schools and that the general freedoms and liberties that the courts manage? What do the american people want with courts and justices and the international community? What does the american people want with regards to Iran and Russia and the Houthis and Syria and Ukraine and Europe? I think Tucker has his finger on the pulse better than anyone.
He possesses an agile mind that Trump doesn’t have. But that’s the beautiful thing. He would be a guide and a help for Trump, and Trump would be a guide and a help for Tucker in many ways. And I think just at the end of one term, Trump’s final term, he would have a complete cathartic moment of, he fought the good fight, he ran the race. And then Tucker would come in and say, if you want eight more years, I’m game.
And it’s not really a difficult job for him, because he’s not taking it on himself. He’s saying, what do the american people want? What do the american people want? The president. Because when you look at the president, Jim, it was always just a figurehead. The president was never supposed to make laws, nor was he to be anything other than a cheerleader for the american people. And these agencies have to be controlled, policed and shut down.
Reagan started to try and do some of that, but I think we’re in a position to shut down the power to a lot of these government agencies that we couldn’t do before, largely, I think, because of the devastation of the dollar. And that’s the other thing Tucker understands, but I won’t digress. I’ll hand it back to you to jump in. Well, march of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
And first, we have to capture the nomination for ourselves. Trump seeks knockout blow performance in New Hampshire to become presumptive nominee. He did have a very substantial victory. We don’t know the exact margin yet. Going in the final Gob primary poll at Trump was 62% and Haley, 35. Now, it seems to me, because in New Hampshire, independents are allowed to vote, and many democrats have been encouraged to re register as independent just to vote for Haley.
That margin is going to be significantly reduced, I think, by at least ten, possibly 15%. So Trump will win. The question is whether or not it’ll be the kind of blowout he was hoping for, because Nikki Haley is already declaring it’s onto South Carolina, where she was the governor. But that’s a ways off. We’ll see what happens here. Meanwhile, here you are addressing this very question. I have not so many questions for you.
Simple two questions about New Hampshire primary. What can you say about importance of New Hampshire primary that we have today? Why it is important event for presidential? Well, essentially, the New Hampshire primary, which is upon us, will determine the republican candidate for the presidential election. Donald Trump most likely is going to run away with the nomination, similar to how he did at the Iowa caucus, which will probably be between 50 and 55% of the electorate will choose him over the other candidates.
And specifically, Nikki Haley is essentially the only one left running against him. And she represents a corporate, old Republican, endless war, military industrial complex, fear mongering side of the Republican Party that not only are Republicans tired of. But the majority of the people in the United States are tired of that mindset. We’ve had it for 20 years, which has sent this country down the road of ruin as well as ruined other countries.
So I don’t think Nikki Haley really has any hope in the republican side of politics. This will determine and show that President Trump has the majority of the backing of the people, not because he is anything essentially special or brilliant, but because Joe Biden is especially stupid, evil, and incompetent in the eyes of the american voters. So they’re choosing the lesser of two evils, you could say. But I don’t think Donald Trump has too much of the evil side.
He’s essentially a small government, family values, independent, libertarian minded, moderate Republican. So I think that is going to be far more attractive to Americans than continuing down the road of economic ruin. Endless wars, open borders, pandemic, fear mongering, forced vaccinations, woke ideological transgender homosexual propaganda, and a militarized FBI police state that is grotesquely corrupt and has demonstrated so in the past four years, from covering up the Hunter Biden laptop story to inventing this Russia hoax, to all sorts of other disturbing actions by a government agency.
So Joe Biden represents all of that, as the Democrats do, while the Republicans represent a side of America that had the election stolen from them in 2020, and Donald Trump did win that election. But the corruption in the United States Congress amongst the rhinos, the Republicans that want war, that want war against Iran, that want war against Russia, these rhinos, republican name only, and these Democrat leftists have merged into a single corporate party.
So I think you’re really witnessing America tear into two camps. But essentially, it’s two thirds of Americans would prefer a presidency without Biden, while only maybe one third, even less than that, want Biden, not because of himself, but because they’re so stubborn in their party politics. So this is going to be a very climactic showdown. And day we’ll see. Also, if Nikki Haley is loyal to the republican cause, or if she abandons the republican party and thinks that she can be nominated as a Democrat or libertarian, there’s always a chance for that wild card.
And I do believe they are going to be changing Joe Biden with Gavin Newsom. And that’s why it opens the door for Nikki Haley to be a vice president, in the hopes that she’ll attract non Trump republican voters. But Gavin Newsom or Nikki Haley or some have said Michelle Obama. But I don’t think Michelle Obama would really have any hope, because there is a large group of Americans that have reported in the alternative media that Michelle Obama is actually a transvestite named Michael Levon Robinson.
And there’s a wealth of material disclosing that photographic proof. The death of Joan Rivers, the comedian who first let it out, Barack Obama being a closet homosexual. That’s been confirmed by Tucker Carlson and people that have engaged in sexually depraved acts with Barack Obama. So people, I think, have quickened and learned about just how grotesquely deceptive Obama and Michelle Obama, Michael Levon Robinson, are. So I don’t think it Michael Levon Robinson, aka Michelle Obama, has any hope in the presidential politics coming up because Americans would be horrified and disgusted if they learned the true identity and nature of Michelle Obama.
Okay, thank you very much. Next question. You mentioned Michelle Obama, and what do you think? Is it even possible for her, or for it, how you call it, to join election race presidential? Know, I think Michelle Obama’s mystique is amplified by a lot of delusion and fantasy and almost intoxicated pageantry. People are excited and thrilled with their own self worth and their own self virtue if they think that they’re electing a black woman into a position of power, vice presidency or presidency.
This carried Barack Obama in his election in 2008. Although he was a skilled orator, he was not someone that the american people really had any experience with or trust in. However, he was black, and he was a good speaker. So as people became intoxicated with that notion of I’ll be the first person to vote for a black president, that carried them away. And I think the same sort of carried away nostalgia and delusion and fantasy carries a lot of people to support Michelle Obama because she represents a connection to Barack Obama, which a lot of these democrat, liberal leftists like.
They like Obama. They like his left wing politics. They like his homosexual proclivities, they like his degeneration of America. And therefore, they like Michelle Obama because she’s close to that. So there is a wing of the american electorate that are so, I would describe it, mentally challenged, stupid, delusional, ignorant, foolish, childish, narcissistic, and selfish. That they would put above logic and reason and rationale and true professional credentials and qualifications.
They would put all that to the side and vote simply because of the appearance of a black woman as a vice president. But I don’t think that represents the majority of the american public today. The majority of the american public today have suffered more than they have ever suffered in their entire existence. The american government, the american population, the american reputation, the american economy, the american military, every institution, every activity, every value of the United States has been blurred and tried to be washed away and erased by the Biden holdover administration from Barack Obama.
And we also have wars that have inflamed because of the Biden administration, from Ukraine to Gaza to other places. So the american public is not so enchanted with this princess ideal of putting in Michelle Obama. Rather, I think they’re in survival mode. And the american people realize if they do not get rid of this Joe Biden and his entire team, they won’t have an economy, they won’t have a us dollar, they won’t have a house, they won’t have a country, they will have perhaps smoldering ruins under slag heaps and smoke coils of a nuclear war that the United States would lose.
And I think people are aware of this, and that is going to be their primary drive, is a vote for survival means voting for Donald Trump or not voting for Biden, whereas the media and these delusional fantasy people are a very small degree of the population, but they will vote against Trump and against the Republicans just out of a sense of party without any reason, any reflection, any logic, any analysis of where the country stands with regards to all these subjects.
So I think the majority of the people, however, are going to be motivated by a survival vote, and the survival vote is going to carry Trump because people can reflect on when he was president, the country was far better off when he left or was thrown out. All of a sudden, lots of holes began appearing in the boat of America, and America’s been sinking ever since. So I think people are going to rise up and vote to stop the sinking of the american ship and bite the bullet and vote for Trump.
Scott I think that was very well said, and you covered a lot of bases. It’s unusual in american election that foreign policy makes a difference. But in this instance, I believe, in fact it is. And therefore, I want to turn to what appears to be the major foreign policy calamity of our time, where it’s not just Ukraine and Gaza, but now Yemen. Biden has started another us war rights Caitlin Johnstone in Lou Rockwell.
The Washington Post has an article entitled Houthi’s Vow to fight on US prepares for sustained campaign with sustained campaign and empire speak for a new american war Biden administrator crafting plans for a sustained military campaign targeting the Houthis in Yemen after ten days of strikes failed to halt the group’s attacks on maritime commerce, stoking concern among some officials that an open ended operation would derail the war ravaged country’s fragile peace and pull Washington into another unpredictable Middle east conflict.
The post acknowledges that sustained military campaign means war in the 9th paragraph of the article, saying the anonymous U. S. Official cited in the report don’t expect that the operation will stretch on for years like previous us wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. In none of which do we acquit ourselves well, which is about as reassuring as a pyromaniac saying he doesn’t expect he’ll be burning down any more homes like all those other houses he’s burned down.
Crafting plans for a sustained military campaign, meaning a war. Houthis have already been at war with Saudi Arabia using american planes and american weapons. So now if they’re flown by american pilots, if they weren’t flown before, it’s not going to affect the Houthis. The bizarre refusal to call a war a war also beered at a recent press conference with Pentagon’s spokesperson Sabrina Singh, who acted shock and aghast words, would ask if repeatedly bombing a country would qualify as being at war with them.
Is it fair now to say the US is at war in Yemen? Singh was asked by a Reuters reporter. No, we don’t seek war, Singh replied. We don’t think that we are at war. We don’t want to see a regional war. The hoodies are the ones that continue to launch cruise missiles, antiship missiles, at innocent mariners, at commercial vessels that are just transiting the area, that sees, you know, ten to 15% of the world’s congress, which Scott, as you well know, was a duplicitous statement.
These are at war with Israel. They have declared war on Israel. They were interdicting ships with cargo bound for Israel. That is all in accordance with international law. It is the strikes by the US and the UK that are violations of international law and war crimes. In a follow up, Singh was asked by a reporter from Politico, you said, we’re not at war with hoothees, but if you know this tit for that bombing, we bombed them five times now.
So if this isn’t war, can you just explain this a little bit more to us? If this isn’t war, then what is war? Sure, Laura, sure. Great question. I just wasn’t expecting it praised that way, she said with a laugh and a smirk. Look, we do not seek war. We are. We are not at war with a Houthis. In terms of a definition, I think that would be more of a clear declaration from the United States.
But again, we are doing the action. We’re taking our defensive in nature, which is just flat out false. That’s a deliberate lie. It’s worth noting, since the Thursday press conference, the number of strikes on Yemen by the United States has increased from five to seven. Meanwhile, anywar. com reports U. S. Prepares open ended war against the Houthis in Yemen. Biden has bombed Yemen seven times in just a week, and the Houthis are not backing down, welcoming confrontation with the United States.
Meanwhile, Russia’s Lavrov, by far the most experienced diplomat in the world, today rejects the US proposal. Resume nuclear arms talks after all, we violated every treaty we haven’t had with him, the misagreement being a stellar example of lying to deceive Russia. We have forfeited our credibility. Russia cannot take any agreement with United States or any NATO nation at face value. Why bother? Russia’s top lipomat has rejected A-U-S.
Proposal to resume a dialogue on nuclear arms control, saying it’s impossible, while Washington offers military support to Ukraine. I think it’s actually far more serious. Speaking at a news conference Thursday, Sergey Lavrov accused the west of fueling global security risks by encouraging Ukraine to ramp up strikes on russian territory and warned that Moscow will achieve its goals in the conflict regardless of western support. Commenting on a US proposal, resume contacts in the sphere of nuclear arms control, Labrov said Moscow has rejected the offer.
For such shock to be helped, Washington first needs to revise its current policy toward Russia. Labrov charged Washington push for a revival of nuclear talks had been driven by desire to resume inspection of Russia’s nuclear weapons sites. He described such demands as indecent in view of Ukraine’s attacks on russian nuclear capable bomber bases during the conflict amid a hybrid war waged by Washington against Russia. We aren’t seeing any basis not only for additional joint measures in the sphere of armed control and reduction of strategic risk, but for any discussion of strategic stability issues with the US.
We firmly link such possibility to the west, fully renouncing its malicious course aimed at undermining Russia’s security and interest. The minister said Washington’s push for restoring nuclear arms talks is rooted in a desire to try to establish control over our nuclear arsenal and minimize nuclear risk for itself, but added, those risks are emerging as a result of forceful pressure on our country. He accused the west of blocking any talks on ending the conflict and inciting the ramping up of attacks on Russia.
Such encouragement and the transfer of relevant weapons shows the west doesn’t want any constructive solution. The west is pushing toward the escalation of the ukrainian crisis, which raises new strategic risk. Scots, your thoughts. I mean, it’s proving to be influential among voters who believe that Biden is putting the nation at unnecessary risk. There’s no confidence in Biden’s conduct of foreign policy just based on polls from even New Hampshire.
Well, I have to laugh when I see these Indians assuming positions in the Biden administration just because I shake my head. Know you’re supposed to be smarter than that. You’re supposed to be a smart people. The indian engineers and all of know you’re supposed to be really intelligent, almost asian like, and you’re dumb as a bag of rocks if you’re on the Biden team, they’ve got an indian guy in the State Department, looks like a big fat kind of gay guy, and then you’ve got this indian woman and they’re really just ignorant into, oh, we don’t think we’re at war.
It doesn’t matter what you think. It matters what the other country thinks. If they see you’re at war with them, they’re going to go to war with you. And you can’t close off and control war. It can get out of control very fast. And McGregor said that too. To make a long story short, Jim, here’s how it’s going to go. I predict the Shinbet, Mossad, israeli Zionists, Ashkenazis and their masonic FBI are going to set off some false flag events in the United States and blame it on Iran, blame it on Yemen, blame it on the Houthis, blame it on Iraqis, blame it on the Syrians and say, aha, they’ve blown up something.
So now we all have to get behind this war against them in the waterways. But that is going to result in sinking of several us ships, probably in June. And then you’re going to have the Biden people try and step up and say, you see? You see, now we really have to go to war. Everybody has to be drafted. And I think that’s where the Republicans and Trump and Tucker and everybody else comes in going, enough.
This is totally out of control. Number one, we wrote a resolution that barred the president from attacking Iran when Trump was in power. That resolution certainly should stand right now. And the Congress can say the same thing. And the Congress declares war, not the president. The Republican Congress can say, the president is directed to pull out all military operations, bombings, attacks, destruction of infrastructure, destruction of lives out of the Yemen area in exchange for Yemen, allowing all U.
S. Ships not bound to Israel and all ships from other countries not bound to Israel to go through with the condition that they’re not going to be delivering weapons or things for the israeli genocide. The Republicans could make that deal tomorrow. And the Yemenis would say, yeah, no problem. You could have all your ships and every ship on planet earth go through as long as they’re not giving anything to help kill women and children in Gaza.
And the Republicans could make that deal and the Democrats would be left out in the cold and the Jews, the Israeli Zionists, would be left out in the cold. I could see something like that happen because this engagement is only going to result in the slow defeat and destruction of everything american, from ships to bases. Iran could launch thousands of missiles against U. S. Central command in Qatar and level the entire military base in Qatar, level it, make it look like Gaza.
Iran could do that. Russia could certainly assist them in that. Iraq could do that, but Iran won’t do that. And I think you’re going to see a peaceful off ramp here. But we’re witnessing the Biden administration trying to trigger war because they’re like Netanyahu themselves. Biden and the Obama types think that if they create war, they can hang on to power by the skin of their teeth and maybe even do worse, like suspend the elections and do another disease.
X Covid-19 let’s dust off the playbook. This is a matter of existential life or death for America. And it hinges upon the Republicans stepping in saying, we’ve made a deal with Yemen, the Republican Congress has made a deal with all of our ships will go through as long as we’re not doing x, Y and z. It’s a deal waiting to be made and all the american people would be behind it.
And after Israel in the next three months, the other thing to watch, Jim, the condition in Gaza is going to turn know, want and destruction to a plague and a famine of biblical proportions. We are going to see with our own eyes the physical bodies of women and children in Gaza wither away into skeletal zombie sort of human beings because remember, the human being is very difficult to kill.
They can last for a long, long time like the Donner party. They can last for a year with specks of food. So I anticipate come spring, June, you will see all of this take a big pivot shift. I’ll say May 15, Jim. Very good, Scott. We have a new story about how long they’ve. Well, the Supreme Court sides with Biden over the border crisis. This is shocking to me, extremely disappointing.
The US Supreme Court Monday afternoon side with a Biden admin in a case reviewing the ongoing use of razor wire along the Texas border with Mexico. In the new ruling, federal authorities are now allowed to cut razor wiring. Texas as installed previously, Governor Abbot put up over 30 miles of razor across the US Mexico border, but now it’s in danger of all being cut down. After the Supreme Court ruling, they cited in a five to four decision with Chief Justice Roberts and Amy Clooney Barrett siding with a majority.
Three liberals. Meanwhile, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh voted against as should have been done. Here’s Greg Price tweeting the Supreme Court has ruled five to four the Biden admin can remove physical barriers. Texas wooded their border to stop the invasion. Barrett and Roberts voted with libs, earning our eternal damnation. The US Supreme Court sided with Biden and the court’s decision allows a border control to cut concertina wire.
Roughly 30 miles had been installed. The Biden admin argued the wire impeded the border Patrol from reaching migrants as they crossed the river. In that, federal immigration law trumps Texas own efforts to stem the fall. In a five to four vote, the justice has granted an emergency appeal from the Biden admin. The deciding vote was cast by justice roberts, while Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were in the dissent.
Amy Coney Bear, at a Trump appointee, also sided with a majority. Meanwhile, Texas National Guard responds to the Supreme Court order by installing more razor wire the Texas National Guard responded to the Supreme Court’s order allowing the Biden regime to cut or remove razor wire installed during the southern border by installing more. The court sided with a Biden regime to allow border agents to remove it. Governor Abbot had previously installed 30 miles.
In October, Texas Attorney General Paxton filed a lawsuit against the regime regarding their cutting razor wire. The lawsuit made its way to the fifth court of Appeals after a federal judge sided with Biden. The appellate court said agent could not cut the razor wire. Thus it went to the Supreme Court five to four granting Biden’s request. This is the 9th time the Supreme Court has sided with a Biden regime.
Out of 14 emergency applications, Texas Governor Abbot and Attorney General Paxton on Monday that would be yesterday vowed to defy the Supreme Court ruling. The Supreme Court temporary order allowed Biden to continue his illegal effort to aid the Ford invasion of America. The destruction of Texas border barriers will not help enforce the law. Keep american citizens safe. This fight is not over and I look forward to defending our state’s sovereignty.
Here’s the attorney general. Here’s Charlie Kirk. The Texas National Guard responds to the Supreme Court order to remove the razor wire in eagle vests. By installing even more, Governor Abbot is set. Texas will not back down as it defends the border. Here’s some footage of installing even more. I’m very glad, I’m very proud of Texas for standing up for what is right. I am appalled and blame the Supreme Court of the United States for failing to uphold the national security of the United States in an absolutely vital case.
Your thoughts, my friend? Well, the Texas National Guard needs to take these border patrol agents, whoever they are, the federal ones that are saying they can cut the wire and sequester them and shame them and give them the opportunity to do the right thing, saying, just turn away, just walk away. Just ignore the reports. Ignore the orders that you’re claiming to get. Say, no, we can’t do that.
And I’m not going to put myself at risk and do something that’s going to get my ass kicked or get me in trouble because I live in Texas. I don’t live in Maine or Boston and fly down to Texas for a job. These Texas border patrol federal employees live in Texas. And Texas needs to get these guys and say, you belong to Texas, not Biden, and you’re expected to do the right thing.
And they can also throw blocks, know, declare this is a national emergency. It is an invasion. It is not a refugee resettlement operation. It is an invasion. And Joe Biden is guilty of treason. And we’re introducing impeachment against him in the Texas legislature, and we are refusing to allow this man to commit treason. The border with Texas is Texas’s border. And Texas was a republic before it became a state.
And so Texas can even rely upon its original founding documents and agreement that was different than with the other states. And it can declare Texas entered into this union with the full understanding that its border would be managed and protected by Texas, no one else. And Texas relies upon that. It’s never waived that, and that is a condition of it coming into the union, and it refuses to leave the union, but it refuses to surrender this policy.
So this is going to get very gritty and abrasive, but Texas needs to just say, no, we’re standing for the border. And we invite every law enforcement agent and national guardsman from every other state to come here and help us lay razor wire, because whatever they cut down, we’re going to put back up and make sure anyone that tries to cut the wire down or let these immigrants is going to be charged for aiding and abetting treason, invasion, and other crimes.
Jim I’m not alone in feeling the Supreme Court blew it on this, Scott, that this is, for me, the final straw. I no longer respect the Supreme Court of the United States, and I stand with Texas in defying this absolutely illogical, unamerican, unconstitutional decision. It speaks of ways of extorting, blackmailing, otherwise manipulating the justice as there’s no other way to account for it. Scott. It’s just as that discrepancy between the poll numbers where Trump had 65 35 before the vote and paying or getting Democrats to vote per Haley is going to reduce it.
We’re seeing a deviation between what the Constitution requires, which is upholding the borders of the United States in accordance with the laws of the United States and what’s happening here, and that’s a measure of the corruption of the Supreme Court. We have another very disturbing story, actually. Well, here we go. Let’s put it this way. Wayne root. I say out loud when others only whisper, is there any patriot in America who isn’t thinking Supreme Court justices are being bribed or blackmailed? Come on, admit it.
You know you’re thinking the same thing. It’s so obvious. It’s just common sense. Anyone who is at least wondering is his naive fool. I grew up in an all italian mafia neighborhood in New York. I know when the fix is in. I know when someone has taken a bribe. I know when the mafia has their hooks into someone. Something is wrong with our United States Supreme Court. Something smells to high heaven.
Something is pinky. Someone is being bribed, threatened, intimidated, or extorted. This just isn’t normal. It makes no sense. Conservatives have the edge. Not just five to four, but a safe, overwhelming six to three. We should be winning every major supreme Court case, and yet we keep losing with the most obvious, clear cut life or death of America cases. Cases that should be slam dunks. Cases where it’s so clear that no conservative or patriot in all of America would vote against us.
Cases where a vote against us is a vote for the intentional destruction of America. Yet yesterday, our six to three edge at the court became a five to four loss in the most obvious, simple, clear cut case in american history. Again, just like Obamacare. Twice. Just like allowing illegals to count the US Senate that determines who represents us in Congress. Yesterday, the supremes voted five to four against Texas and a in favor of the insane radical marxist madmin of the Biden admin.
B in favor of open borders and against the sovereignty of the United States of America, c. In favor of the intentional destruction of America, d against state rights enshrined in the Constitution and e in favor of leaving the american people completely helpless to stop a mass invasion of our country. Who could possibly vote against the interests of America in a secure border? Who could possibly vote against Texas and ignore states right? Who could rule that a state and its legal american citizens have no right to defend against a mass invasion of criminals? Who could possibly vote? That is, millions of military age males from Abos, Hezbollah, MS 13, and our mortal enemy, China pour into our border.
A state cannot even put up razor wire to try to slow the invasion down. Chief Justice John Roberts and Janie Amy Coney Barrett. Amy Barrett, one of the recent Trump appointments recommended a President Trump by the fantastic pro constitutional federal society. Among they were the two conservatives who voted that way. How is this possible? There’s not one conservative or patriot in all of America who would have voted this way.
So how did two supposedly conservative justices stab America in the back and vote against states’rights and for the destruction of America? I’ll say it out loud. It’s my opinion that we just found out who the bribed or blackmailed rat pink traders are. No normal, honest, pro rule of law, pro american judge on earth would vote this way. It’s not even possible. It’s unimaginable. It’s absurd. It’s insanity. It’s like two conservative judges just voted for national suicide.
Think about it. These two conservative justices just voted for letting in all the world’s criminals to murder us. All the world’s armies to conquer us. All the world’s third world poverty and misery to bankrupt us. All the world’s diseases, all the world pedophilia and child sex trafficking, all the world’s drugs, all the world fentanyl to keep killing over 100,000 of our american children every year. They voted to keep raising our national debt by insane half a trillion dollar per year to pay for the welfare, food stamp, housing, schooling and health care of these illegal invaders until our economy collapses.
They ruled that in response to this mass born invasion, we, the people and the states of the United States have no say. This is the same Supreme Court and the same two conservative justices who believe big brother has the right to lock down its own citizen, close their businesses, and restrict their civil rights, and use government mandates to force a deadly, untested experimental vaccine that clearly violates a Nuremberg code into our bodies.
But we have no right to stop a foreign invasion from destroying our lives and our country. Scott, he nailed it. Yeah, I think they are blackmailing Amy Coney Barrett by influencing and leveraging her children, her adoption. Remember, there was an adoption. There’s some weird stuff with her and these kids that she brought into the family. I think that’s the leverage point. They’re threatening to go after these kids, take them away from her, charge her with illegal activities, maybe throw in sex trafficking, or it’s very easy to put pornography on computers and stuff like that and all sorts of other claims.
So I think that’s got something to do with the leverage over Amy Coney Barrett. And then, of course, John Roberts is homosexually compromised. So they’ve no doubt had videos and photographs from the Epstein island over John Roberts. But they are traitors and they should be completely impeached, because this is an invasion and no state government should listen or pay any attention or do anything that the Supreme Court says they should stand up for their people in defending their rights, property, constitution.
And this is the heart of why you have government to defend against invasion. Jim, I’m just floored to hear you say about Amy Coney Barrett, because, Scott, John Roberts has the same problem. He’s got two kids that were adopted from Ireland, and there are legal questions about it. So it would appear they got the same stranglehold on roberts they have on Amy Comey Barrett. This is stunning. That’s how they do it.
They’ve got a leverage grip over her kids, the adoption process, their source, their experience. Have they been sexually abused, compromised? Or have they secretly generated film and stuff material to claim? I mean, this is where the leverage point comes. But again, I think we’re going in a way where, because the petrodollar, the US currency, is going to go to zero like the ruble did in 1998, you’re not going to have a motivation to really pay or use the dollar.
So that’s going to be a major shift. And in a sense, here’s the other thing, Jim. We need to cut our military and government by 50%. The only military platforms that we need to develop are defensive. That’s why Russia is very successful and others are, too. We don’t need to have a naval fleet all around the world. We can have submarines, and that’s very effective. But we need to focus on missiles and torpedoes that can reach halfway around the world and destroy anything that comes at us from a long distance as well as in the air.
And I’ve said for a long time, the defense platform that needs to be developed is like aircraft carrier Hindenburg sort of mix that can fly in stealth mode maybe 1000 miles above the earth. Think about how high that would be. And then you’ve got the ability to detect and deter attacks. It’s not a difficult platform to develop, but we for so long have invested in just money making platforms, planes, tanks, all of these old technologies, and as a result, we’ve been surpassed.
We’ve been surpassed in missile technology, torpedo technology, drone technology. Other countries don’t need stealth because they’re not going in to invade other countries. So there’s a lot of opportunity for America to do a major shift. I see the whole government and the Supreme Court really starting to break down over the next six months. This year, Jim, is going to be the year where America incinerates like the Phoenix, but also is resurrected from the ashes by the assistance of the international world community.
So we may go into a coma for a period of time, but I think America will awaken again, refreshed, unlike any other time. And it’s Trump Tucker. Trump Tucker is the key to ushering in a whole mindset. Jim, perfect, perfect. Note to conclude our conversation this evening. ScOtt and I so appreciate what you’re doing here with global freedom tv. I think it’s making a difference. Well, we are indeed, Jim, and I think we’re going to be watching with great enthusiasm what develops.
Is Nikki Haley going to stay in the republican ranks? I think she’d be. And we can end it here, too. I think Nikki Haley, as a conciliatory prize, should come out to be California and be the mayor of San Francisco and then become the governor of California. Anyone’s better than Gavin Newsom, and she could be like a Rudy Giuliani to New York. Nikki Haley could be the mayor of San Francisco.
Kick the shit out of these homeless drug addict infiltrators, clean up San Francisco like Giuliani cleaned up New York. Then she’d be in a prime position to be the governor of California and be a moderate governor. And you’re not going to be waging war on the world, Nikki. That’s not your job. That’s Trump and Tucker’s job. Your job is to go to California and make it again the prosperous state that it was under Ronald Reagan and Duke Magin.
So that might be something Nikki Haley could be turned towards, is inheriting a different political destiny in California or, you know, wherever she comes. But she’s got a role if she wants it. But if she betrays the Republicans and betrays Trump by becoming a Democrat to run with Gavin Newsom, then she deserves, most likely the death that she would get. So I don’t think she will. I think she’ll stay to the republican ranks because otherwise she’ll be the most hated person ever.
But Gavin Newsom, I do think they’re going to replace Biden and they’re going to run either Gavin Newsom with someone else as the vice president. Michelle Obama? Yeah, I would like to think so because that would just be the ruin of the Democrats. Nikki Haley, possible, or Gavin Newsom and someone else. But we will win if we have a Trump Tucker ticket. Trump Tucker returns us to Mayberry, returns us to Huckleberry Finn, returns us to Ronald Reagan.
It’s morning in America again. It’s a moment we need to sit back, lick our wounds, reflect on 2030 years of bad policy and bad decisions from George Bush senior that started the first Gulf war to the 911 and the Clinton destroying our relationship with Russia, and then these 911, the great false flag wars, and all of this stuff that Trump set us in motion to stop. We need to get back onto that trajectory and Trump and Tucker can do it.
And I think it’s only a win win scenario. And anyone that says no, well, we can’t have know because he’s not politician. That’s exactly what you want. Trump did it and he was successful. Tucker can do it and be double as successful because Tucker is more intelligent than Trump and he is a younger Kennedy sort of person. But he’s not in it for power or vanity. He’s in it to make sure that the american presidency maximizes individual liberty, individual autonomy, and minimizes state control over people’s lives.
That’s what Tucker can teach and educate Trump on. And Trump will feel good at being the hand that pulls that lever. And then you’ll have again, Tucker with two more terms. So you will have twelve years of conservative, republican, moderate healing of America. And I think you will see the other nations of the world respond very positively because Russia likes Tucker and Iran likes Tucker. And I don’t think there’s any nation that doesn’t.
That’s the thing, Jim. The whole world is turning more conservative. And I think we’re about to turn that tide, too. Jim, I’ll hand it to you to get your final closing thought. Go ahead. Well, that’s a great vision for the future of America, Scott. I can endorse it. Amen. Thank you for joining us in globalfreedomtv. com. Go to our website, globalfreedomtv. com. Go to our constitutional law enforcement committee, educate yourself on that.
Go also to thedestroy cancer. If you have any kind of breast cancer, brain cancer, skin cancer, leukemia anything like that. We want you to get the black sav because it will destroy the cancer in your body. I did it with me. There’s video and photographs up there and an amazing substance. All natural. So go up to the destroy cancer and you can see the links there. Plus some of our other websites and videos are up there.
The link. I’m coming right now. God bless you. Thank you for joining us. We will see you again, Dr. Fetzer, next week. God bless. Good night. Our channel. .
See more of Global Freedom TV on their Public Channel and the MPN Global Freedom TV channel.
