SUPREME COURT: Keeps ATF Frame/Receiver Rule Alive For Now!

➡ The video pertains to the presenter’s travel to Oklahoma City to provide an update on the case Vanderstock V Garland regarding frames and receivers. Despite confusion and anger about the case’s progress, including being taken to Supreme Court multiple times, the court has allowed the rule under discussion to remain in effect, an expected development due to judiciary strategy. The case is now under the Fifth Circuit again.

Hey, everybody. Welcome back to the channel. I appreciate your time. Thank you for watching. It’s really, really early here in the morning. I am in Oklahoma City. Can I try to keep it quiet so I don’t bug the people in the room next to next to me? Actually, that’s a stairwell. So we’re good to go. Been a long day of travel, long night of travel. But I’m here in Oklahoma City, and I wanted to get you all up to date with what the Supreme Court did yesterday.

I have talked with Cody Wisniewski of FPC’s legal team, and I wanted to get you guys caught up because a lot of people are upset, a lot of people are angry, pissed, rightfully so. But I wanted to give you an idea of where we are right now because it gets confusing. A lot of back and forth. It’s been to the Supreme Court a couple times. It’s been kicked back now a couple times and want to get everybody on the same boat, rowing in the same direction with this.

This is Vanderstock V Garland. This is the frames and receivers case. Firehouse policy coalition’s case in the Fifth Circuit. And I want to bring you all the way back to this is, what, July 5 of 2023. This order on the screen was what we got from Judge Reed O’Connor, and this vacated the entire rule. Judge O’Connor said ATF was outside of their scope, outside of their authority, vacated the entire rule.

That changed the way the definition of framer receiver government appealed, obviously went to the three judge panel where it still sits, the three judge panel in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. And it’s gone to the Supreme Court on two occasions now, looking for relief from the Supreme Court. Now, it is very common for the Supreme Court to defer to the government on emergency relief. And this being an interim injunction, it was kind of expected.

This already went to the Supreme Court once in August, and the Supreme Court allowed the rule to continue while the trial, based on the merits was still in play. It’s very common in court procedure for this to happen. Like, the Supreme Court just doesn’t jump in and mark their territory and piss all over the neighborhood at early stages of lawsuits. Guys, they just don’t. That’s what this whole structure of federal courts is supposed to do.

They’re supposed to do their job. The Supreme Court has always been a favor of them doing their job. And then if it gets to them looking for Grant Associate, then so be it. But that’s not where we are yet. The Supreme Court yesterday allowed the rule to stay in effect. It is now back in effect fully. We could have the fifth circuit on Bonk panel. Rule today could take them months.

But we’re back in the Fifth Circuit through the three judge panel, and it still has to be a decision made based off of the merits of the case. And I feel that that will go in our way, but you never know with this stuff. But as of right now, the frame and receiver rule is in effect. So you cannot go buy an unserialized frame or receiver. You cannot transfer one.

They have to be serialized. This basically only really affects dealers. Or if you’re looking to sell something you’ve built, you’re going to have to have it serialized. So we’re kind of status quo post ATF’s unconstitutional definition and rule change, if that makes sense to you all. But I just wanted to get on here, do a quick video before I hit the rack, try to get a couple of hours of sleep to let everybody know that it’s not as bad as it sounds.

This was defense distributed and 80% arms looking to have the supreme court stand by the injunction that was given to those two groups after the supreme court allowed the rule to go back into effect while a trial based on its merits takes place. After they got rid of the vacated ruling by judge Rita O’Connor. There’s a lot of steps, but this was actually anticipated, so it’s not as bad as it seems.

Yes, it sucks that the rule is in effect and it gets to continue to stay in effect while a court will decide that factor. And yes, if the government loses here in the three judge panel, yes, they’re going to appeal again to enbanc and then if they lose the bonk, yes, they will appeal to the supreme court. That’s how it works. Yeah. Just wanted to get you all up to date.

Hey, this is it, guys. This is the last run on these. Only you could have lifted higher. Only you can prevent tyranny once these are gone. This order that has been restocked, once it’s gone, you’ll never see them again. So grab them. Link is down below. Thanks to TriStar Trading. Thank you all for supporting this channel. Thank you all in Oklahoma at the OK. Two a meeting. Who want to hear me speak at it? I can’t wait to see you all out there in a couple of hours.

It’s going to be a good time. It’s my first time here in Oklahoma. Hopefully we’ll grab a big steak tomorrow today, you know what I mean? I appreciate y’all I need to get some shut eye until we see each other again. Be safe, stay vigilant, carry a gun to keep you, your friends, your family, your community safe. That’s what it’s all about. We got a fight in front of us.

The legal system is doing it right now. It’s working its way. I know we all want it done the right way immediately, but we’re not done yet. Take care, you Sam. .