Saint Joseph of Wisconsin – Part 7 | LIVESTREAM BEGINS AT 7 PM EST

➡ Ron Partain, a YouTuber and audiobook enthusiast, shares his challenges with stubborn cat Maddie and reflects on his research on McCarthyism. He considers starting another channel named ‘Crazy Uncle Ron’ for shorter, current affairs content alongside his historical studies. In his exploration of YouTube, he appreciates the platform’s potential for spreading truth despite its abundance of misinformation.
➡ The text discusses a flight that strayed over Soviet airspace, leading to suspicion and controversy. It then proceeds to analyze the Army-McCarthy hearings and the controversial interaction between Senator McCarthy and Joseph Welch. McCarthy’s questioning of Welch is framed as necessary in the broader context of investigating alleged communist influences. The text criticizes the perceived dramatization and biased reporting of McCarthy’s behavior and underlines questions pertaining to the inexplicable presence of a communist lawyer in the United States Army hearings.
➡ The text discusses the perceived unfair media coverage and political interference against Senator Joe McCarthy, ultimately leading to his censure and the loss of Republican seats in the 1950s. It alleges the manipulation of public opinion by “fake news”, the deliberate political moves by Eisenhower against conservative Republicans, and McCarthy’s fight against communism, suggesting a drastic political shift in the Congress.
➡ The text discusses media bias, illustrating that media outlets often talk over right-wing speakers to prevent them from expressing their viewpoints. It also delves into the story of Senator McCarthy, highlighting his fight against communism and his consistent conflict with politically motivated committees that aimed to tarnish his reputation.
➡ Joseph McCarthy, member of the Debald Republican Senate Minority, utilized public speeches to alert the public about the threats posed by communism. Despite losing his chairmanship power, he never surrendered, calling for aid for Hungarian freedom fighters, warning about the Soviet Union’s advancements in the missile race, and urging the Eisenhower Administration to allow Asians to fight against communism. McCarthy adopted a baby girl in 1957 and continued to fight communism despite setbacks and disappointments until he died in the Bethesda Naval Hospital in 1957. Despite speculations of foul play surrounding his death, McCarthy’s legacy continued to evoke strong sentiments like assessment and reverence, playing a significant role in America’s history and political discourse.
➡ The text discusses the role of the American intelligence, the media, and certain political figures in influencing Cuba’s turn to Marxism, Castro’s ascension, and Soviets’ penetration in the US during the cold war era. There’s an insinuation of a globalist conspiracy implicating prominent figures, including the Kennedys, Eisenhower, and Joe McCarthy, each allegedly playing a part. Lastly, acknowledgments of a New World Order through quotes from notable figures such as Carol Quigley, Walter Cronkite, and Hillary Clinton.
➡ The text discusses views on global governance and concerns about education systems’ influence. It highlights global leaders’ attitudes towards world order, with figures such as Putin and Trump opposing a unipolar world. The text also posits that education, particularly at the university level, may indoctrinate students with harmful ideologies such as Marxism or overly liberal perspectives. It argues that cultural, economic, and political revolutions have occurred, affecting wage disparity, tax systems, moral compasses, and political freedom. The role of media and public opinion in shaping society is also addressed. The text suggests that these changes are not accidental but the result of efforts by those behind a ‘new world order’. Finally, it points out the importance of proper education in preserving American and Western civilization.
➡ The speaker reflects on various political, historical, and socio-cultural issues, such as the effects of the 17th Amendment and Reynolds v. Sims on American democracy, the impact of population-based district lines on representation, and the relevance of past conflicts in today’s society. He also mentions his upcoming travel plans and schedules for future broadcasts.

To the untold History Channel. My name is Ron partain, and it is Sunday. When is today? Today is January the 7th, week into the new year, one week down, 51 to go. I had to deal with one of my cats was in here. And know I always talk about Winchester, but I barely talk about Maddie. Maddie’s the one who she won’t meet across the country. Maddie is Maddie Max Road warrior.

I couldn’t give her mad Max because she’s a. She is a. She’s half bangle, half savannah, and she is an extraordinarily picky cat. Oh, my God. You want to talk about Finicky? She takes finicky to a whole new level. I assure you. There’s not one type of food that I have not bought to try to see if she will eat it, and she just doesn’t want to eat.

So she was in here begging for food. I don’t know what to do. I do the best I can. But anyway, I tried to pick her up and get her out of here because I didn’t want her crying. She scratched me in the face. I don’t know if you can see. I drew blood. Anyway, had to deal with that. But anyway, I am back, and we’re going to finish off.

I’m going to try to finish off the. The final chapter of the St. Joe from Wisconsin tonight. This has been an interesting trip down, kind of know. I will say that prior to going through this book, I knew very little of McCarthyism and whatnot, other than the fact that I think I listened to. I listened to a lot of audiobooks, and I remember listening to a book that was done.

I want to. What was her name? Anne Coulter. I remember listening to one of Anne Coulter’s books, and this is actually before Q, before I was even aware of. So. And I remember she had talked in one of her books. I think it was called Godless or something like that. And she essentially was saying how McCarthy was proven know. Outside of that, I really didn’t know know. I’d never taken the time to kind of investigate this.

Hold on a second. I’d never taken the time to really investigate much of the McCarthy thing. And it’s been very eye opening to me, to say the least. And quite frankly, I’m actually considering going through another one of. Another one of the books. I mean, why not? I’m interviewing Mike, and there’s so much material there. He’s got. This is only. We’ve only done two. Imagine. Not that I want to exclusively use Mike King’s material but there’s a lot there to be done.

Incidentally, he kind of gave me an idea when we were doing the last Tuesday night, he gave me an idea, and I’m thinking about rolling with this. He gave me the idea of creating another channel called Crazy Uncle Ron. And I thought that might be an interesting way to do, like, shorts or to kind of just maybe talk about current stuff instead of historical stuff and just kind of come out with a little bit more opinions on individual articles and things that are going on.

Really. I don’t know how much you guys pay attention to YouTube, and I still watch a fair amount of YouTube because there’s stuff on there that’s not necessarily mainstream. But obviously, I do pay very close attention to a lot of the stuff around the Dodgers because that’s my escape, paying attention to stuff on baseball and the Dodgers. That’s my outlet to kind of take a break. And all that stuff is really, truly available on YouTube.

So I’m on YouTube a lot, actually, believe it or not, there’s still some decent stuff out there on of and I don’t necessarily watch television, but that is some stuff that I do spend a fair amount of time on YouTube. And there are a few people. There’s one guy in particular that I really like called liberal hive mind, and he’s very good, actually. And he does like ten minute videos where he’s just talking about, he does like four or five topics a day where he talks about stuff and where he’s exposing the hypocrisy and whatnot.

And anyway, I just thought that crazy Uncle Ron would be a very good channel name. And anyway, I’m considering that. I haven’t made any determination of whether or not I’m going to do it, but that is definitely something that I am considering. Anyway, he planted that seed and kind of funny, I actually went and looked up some. Get it. I understand, Deb. Trust me, I get it. But not everybody on YouTube is bad.

There’s just not everybody on YouTube is bad. I can’t do the whole absolutist thing where everything is bad. I don’t go that route. But there are actually some pretty good things on. And I truly believe that the battle, at least in the video space, the battle for the hearts and minds of people, is still on YouTube. So if you’re going to have an impact on spreading truth, the people who are on Rumble, who are watching me, you guys are pretty much already, in a way, you’re red pilled.

You’re trying to further understand your red pill world. But there are people out there who are still confused and still trying to find their way. And that’s where the battle for the hearts and minds is on YouTube. If I’m going to evangelize, so to speak, that’s the platform to evangelize on. Anyway, just kind of. Just giving you guys some of my ideas and something what I’m thinking about.

Many on boob tube are just good at camouflage. Exactly. Yes, I agree. All right, guys, well, on that note, you know what? I want to touch on something also. I found a video of the creator or one of the guys who created the documentary that I showed about the weatherman on Friday night. And sure enough, the guy who did it, the guy who put it up, I don’t want to say that he was overtly sympathetic, but he’s like, oh, I understand.

I understand where they’re coming from. Suffice it to say that I definitely think that he was way more sympathetic towards their plight than he was against their plight. There’s a good possibility that I’m going to be playing a few different things. In fact, actually, let me do this here. I want to show you guys something that I came across as a result of that. And I think I played for you the play this real quick here.

This was the guy, Grethwald, or whatever his name was, who’s talking about how they were trying to mathematically plot out how they were going to kill all these people that are diehard. Cap, this is what I really wanted to show you guys. Now check this out. You guys didn’t hear any sound there? Was there no sound. No sound on that video? Hmm? No sound. Crap. Okay. You hear me not try this.

Tell me if you hear sound with this. A nation of 25 million people, and they were dead serious. Very few of these diplomats, journalists, trade missions, and so forth, do not have. Very few members, do not have an espionage role here in this country. They have never wavered from their objective of world domination. Congressman Lawrence McDonald has been an outspoken advocate of improved national security, and he has devoted hundreds of pages in the congressional record to documenting the internal threat of espionage, subversion, and terrorism.

Yes, we are at war. Very definitely. We have been at war. It’s an economic war, it’s a war of subversion, it’s a war of espionage, it’s a war of ideas, and it’s a war of terrorism and infiltration. Is it as serious a war as it would be if there was an exchange of nuclear weapons? The type of war we are in is far more sophisticated than an exchange of gunfire or nuclear weapons even, because it’s a war of attacked upon institutions, it’s a war of attacked upon every segment of a society.

It is total war. It’s foolish to send high technology. Okay, so what he was basically talking about there was fifth generation warfare, was he not? Fifth generation warfare about how they were using. Basically everything was coming into bank. Now, you got to remember this is in the late 70s, early eighty s. Now, I don’t know how many of you are familiar with the airliner, the korean airliner, flight seven, that was shot down over the Camchatka peninsula in 1983.

I believe it was the Kal seven cover up where the Russians shot down that aircraft. Larry McDonald was on that plane. The guy that I just showed you, he was on that aircraft. So a little interesting tidbit of information. Now, whether or not they shot down that aircraft because he was on it or that they were actually on a spy mission, I don’t know. In fact, I just picked up that book.

I just arrived the other day, and I just kind of cracked it. But I’m having a hard time reading. Honestly, I’m having a hard time reading the small lettering that close. Anyway, I want to get in there and I want to dig into that book, but yeah. The korean airliner had strayed over the soviet airspace, the Kamchatka peninsula, and over Saklin island. And as I understand it, Sakhalin island.

In fact, here, I’ll do this just so that you guys can kind of see. Let’s see here. K-A-L path images open in new tab it. So the flight took off out of Anchorage, and then it was supposed to come down. It was supposed to come down here and then fly over northern Japan, and it didn’t make flew. Let’s see here. I’ll do this in yellow. So they were off path, and then they flew over Kamchatka peninsula and then over Sakalin island, and then they were shot down right there.

Now, as I understand, Sakalin island was kind of like, almost like an area 51, like a russian area 51 type thing. A lot of people think that the Russians or that the flight was set up to fail. Whether or not that’s true, I don’t know. But anyway, I digress. So let’s see here. All right. Okay. Enough funny. Enough funny business. Let’s get into the book here. Let’s get to finishing chapter 15.

All right. Hey, what’s going on there, redneck? All right, let’s see here. Okay, so the final fall of McCarthy 1954. Like so many other historical lies, the gross misinterpretation of Joe Welch’s now legendary, immortalized and so bloodied damn cliched retort to Joe McCarthy, have you no sense of decency, sir? Quickly collapses upon closer inspection. When we see the overall context of the event, it becomes apparent that McCarthy’s questioning of Welch, attorney for the army, was neither out of order nor outside of the boundaries of decency, and at all to the contrary.

It was Welch who raised his voice, turned hostile, and displayed indecency. And I’m just saying, when people do this, it’s me thinketh thou doth protest too much right out of shakespeare. The army McCarthy hearings came about due to McCarthy’s allegations of red penetration of the army and the army’s counterattacks upon McCarthy’s trusted sidekick, Roy Cohn. Joseph Welsh was a partner at Hale and Door, the Boston law firm hired to represent the army.

Prior to the start of the hearings, Welch had tapped Fred Fisher as the junior attorney to assist him during the hearings. It was soon discovered that Fisher, while in Harvard Law School, had joined the National Lawyers Guild, a communist front organization, if there ever was one. McCarthy was understandably suspicious over the fact that the army’s chosen law firm tried to assign a communist, or at least a communist sympathizer, fellow traveler, to confront and confound a senate committee tasked with exposing communists within the ranks of the very government which the army is supposed to answer to.

Welch had to withdraw Fischer from the case in a very calm and civil tone. See that video at YouTube? McCarthy questioned Welch about his communist boy Fischer. That’s when the grandstanding, Welch, animated and agitated, put on the self righteous and aggressive victimization act which assembled the press and later the fake historians and Hollywood made so famous. Welch accused McCarthy of recklessness and cruelty, accusations which stick to this day.

But was Joe McCarthy really being reckless and indecent in his exchange with attorney Welch? You decide. Let me see if I can find Welch versus McCarthy on YouTube. Let’s see here. If we can find it. Let’s see here. Have, you know, decency? So this is, this is. This is a short. Well, it’s 45 minutes. I want that one. Let’s see this one. In early 1954, with his power at his peak, Senator McConnell takes a gang armed with the flimsiest of evidence.

Of evidence. He takes on a takes on institution. The US. The US. The flimsiest of evidence. So this is the Smithsonian channel, so take it with a grain of salt, he claims. Millions of Americans with their first sustained look at the crusading senator and his bare knuckle methods. Activities may well determine whether this nation will ever die. I want to make it clear that if the United States.

Okay, so there’s an echo. All right, guys, I’m going to try to mute myself and see if the echo goes away. Let me know if you guys get any audio, because there’s no rhyme or reason. If I do it without the one way, I get an echo and no sound. So anyway, I’m going to mute myself and see if that takes it away. Let me know if you guys can hear.

This does not coddle communists. This committee knows that. The american people know that. For over a month, McCarthy and his team exchange fire with the army’s council. June 1954. A lawyer for the army, Joseph Welch, demands that McCarthy’s staff release its secret list of alleged army subversives. McCarthy responds by dredging up a past link between a young lawyer in Welch’s firm and the communist party. I don’t think you have any conception of the danger of the communist party.

After years of bullying his victims, McCarthy is smug and confident, but Welch counterattacks until this moment. Senator, I think I never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. If it were in my power to forgive you for your reckless cruelty, I would do so. I like to think I’m a gentle man. But your forgiveness will have to come from someone other than me. Millions of Americans. Watch. He was just bathing.

Senator, let us not assassinate this lad further. Senator, you’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency? McCarthy’s gamble, taking on the army backfires. Mr. Welch here has been. His charges don’t stick. Many in his own party turn against him. Six months later, the senate officially censures him. All right, well, that’s enough of that. I don’t really deal with that.

I got to see what I wanted to see. And the hymn saying, have you no sense of decency? On the 30th day of the army McCarthy hearings, the grandstanding Welch challenged Roy Cohen to provide US army attorney General Herbert Brano Jr. With McCarthy’s list of 130 communists, or subversives, working in defense plants before sundown. McCarthy countered Welch’s tactic by stating that if Welch were so truly concerned about subversives aiding the communist party, he should check on a man in his Boston law office named Fred Fisher, who had earlier belonged to the National Lawyers Guild, which Brownell called the legit mouthpiece of the Communist Party.

That’s when Welch put on his famous phony indignation act. Until this moment, senator, I think we have never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. Fred Fisher is a young man who went to the Harvard Law School and came into my firm and is starting what looks like a brilliant career with us. Little did I dream you could be so reckless and so cruel to do an injury to that lad.

Is it true that he is still with Hale and Dorr? And it is true that he will continue to be with Hale and Dor? It is, I regret to say, equally true that I fear he shall always bear a scar needlessly inflicted by you. If it were in my power to forgive you for your reckless cruelty, I would do so. I’d like to think, gentlemen, but your forgiveness will have to come from someone other than me.

May I say that Mr. Welch’s talk about this being cruel and reckless, he just was baiting. He has been baiting Mr. Cohn, McCarthy’s legal assistant, for hours now. I just give this man Fisher’s record and I want to say, Mr. Welch, that it has been labeled for long before he became a member. As early as 1944. Senator, may we not drop this? We know he belonged to the Lawyers Guild.

Let us not assassinate this lad further. Senator, you’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you no sense of decency, McCarthy? Mr. Welch talks about any sense of decency. It seems that Mr. Welch has pained so deeply he thinks it improper for me to give the record, the communist front record, of a man whom he wanted to foist upon this committee. Mr.

Welch, if I have said anything here which is untrue, then tell me. If I’ve heard you and everyone else can talk so much about laying the truth on the table. McCarthy then tries to ask Welch another question about Fisher. The combative Welch, invoking God, quickly interrupts Mr. McCarthy. I will not discuss this further with you. You have sat within 6ft of me and there could have asked me about Fred Fisher.

You’ve seen fit to bring it out and if there is a God in heaven, it will do neither you nor your cause any good. I will not discuss it further. I will not ask Mr. Cohn any more questions. You, Mr. Chairman, may if you will, call the next witness. Audience applause Dear reader, what was so cruel about? What was so indecent about Senator McCarthy while defending his own aide, Roy Cohn from Welch’s inquisition? Wanting to get to the bottom of the mystery of how and why a communist lawyer was assigned to represent the United States? Army during hearings indirectly related to the exposure of Stalin’s red moles.

Stalin had only recently died. One must admit it is a bit troubling. No mind boggling, is it not? And why did Welch overreact and turn so defensive? Answer? Because he was busted, that’s why. The following day, the New York slimes, the Washington Compost, and the rest of the piranha press followed hero Welch’s lead and denounced McCarthy for his tactics. The fake news of yesteryear became the fake history of today, taught to every school child in America.

Frank Kearnan of New Jersey was a teenager at the time. Many years later, he became chapter leader of the anticommunist John Burt Society. In 1991, Kearnan recalled the dishonest newspaper’s coverage of the hearings. I wish I would rush home from school to watch the McCarthy hearings the next day. The newspaper made McCarthy look bad by presenting an account which was completely different from what I saw on live tv.

Long before I understood how things worked in this country, I already knew just how deceitful the press was. Interesting. On July 30, 1954, Ralph Flanders, a Republican of Vermont, at the very behest of Eisenhower, just three months before the critical Senate elections and introduced a resolution calling for the censure of McCarthy, Flanders declared that McCarthy’s conduct as chairman of the investigative committee ran contrary to the senatorial traditions and brought the whole body into disrepute.

He therefore called up to his colleagues to condemn McCarthy’s behavior in an official way. On August 2, the Senate referred to the matter to a bipartisan select community, tasking them with representing. With presenting a report before the end of the 83rd Congress in late 1954 to give the dirty affair the illusion of objectivity. The group consisted of three Republicans and three Democrats. It was led by Chairman Arthur V.

Watkins, Republican of Utah. The committee had no specific offense to work with and therefore had to plot and invent a pretext for the censure. Tv cameras were banned from the hearings this time so that the eloquent and always poised McCarthy could not make his enemies look like fools again. The media’s relentless attacks on Joe McCarthy and the majority of republican party combined with Eisenhower’s deliberate sabotage of the great senator and the conservative Republicans and the weeks leading up to the election cost the GOP 18 seats on the House of Representatives, giving the Democrats a majority that they would retain in every House election until 1994.

Wow. That’s 30 years, guys. 30 years. I remember growing up, I really wasn’t into politics, but I remember that by the time that I was in high school. I graduated in 87. And I remember when Reagan was president and you had Tip O’Neill was the speaker of the House. And shoot, Tip O’Neill was like, I mean, shoot. He’d been speaker of the House for freaking decades. And until 1994, I think 94, when the Republicans won the House, that was when it was, I believe it was Newt Gingrich became the speaker at that time.

In the Senate, the Republicans lost two seats, enough to flip the majority from r to d, thus ending McCarthy’s chairmanship of the investigations committee even before the censure vote, and also positioning the powerful and vicious villain Lyndon Baines Johnson, Democrat, Texas, as the next Senate majority leader. Senate Democrats would hold that advantage until 1981. And yet Eisenhower himself, thanks to the press, remained popular. Besides media hype of Ike and the media bashing of the Republicans, what else accounted for this weird paradox? From the very beginning of his presidency, Ike and his clique of cryptocommies ruthlessly and systematically rooted out Taft conservatives from positions of influence within the Republican Party.

Taft’s oh so convenient and sudden death in 1953 greatly facilitated this effort. Author and activist Robert Welch explains what role this played in the republican debacle of 1954. Robert Welch is actually, I think he was like of the John Burch Society. The violent opposition of the Eisenhower administration to McCarthy and the Bricker amendment fought on first lethargy and what were normally the hardest working units of the party machinery.

This showed up especially in a failure to raise money. And then they brought on second a stayathome tenancy on the part of the millions of conservatives on election day, which visibly decided many of the important outcomes. At the close of 1952, the democratic globalist communist axis of evil was in danger of total exposure. Now, just two years later, Senator Majority Leader Robert Taff was dead. Senator Robert Bricker was neutralized.

Senator Joe McCarthy was declawed, and the conservative republican activists and donors were demoralized and the Democrats would be taking over both houses of Congress, all exactly as Eisenhower and the powers above him had intended. Contrary to the fake historical portrayals of a loud, blustering, unlikable bully, McCarthy always handled himself with style and dignity in front of the tv cameras. His pre censure appearance on Face the Nation, CBS was no exception to best appreciate how calmly and logically McCarthy deflected this attempt ambush.

Find the YouTube video titled CBS Senator Joseph McCarthy on Face the Nation. Let’s see if we can find that today on the CBS public affairs program face the Nation. Through the eyes of this television camera, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy, Republican of Wisconsin, with correspondents across the country questioning him. Live from Indianapolis, New York City. And also here in Washington, here’s the moderator of Face the Nation, Ted Coop, how do you do? Welcome to face the nation.

Senator McCarthy, on the eve of this historic special session of the United States Senate called to debate a motion to censor you. Millions of Americans are wondering what it’s all about. To direct their questions to you. Our panel of newsmen is now assembled nearly halfway across the continent. Here in Washington are William H. Lawrence of the New York Times and William Hines, Jr. Of the Washington Star. Standing by nearly 800 miles away in Indianapolis is Jeff Kadu, Indiana manager of international news Service with a question of interest in the midwest.

Come in, Jeff Kadoo. Senator McCarthy, several weeks ago you predicted that the United States Senate would censor you. And several days ago Roy Coon told us in Indianapolis that the cards were stacked against you. How do you feel about that now? And if you feel the same way, why? Senator, the Democrats, I believe, will go pretty much down the line on this and the so called liberal, I put liberal and, quote, Republicans will go along with them.

I think they’ve got plenty of votes to do it. In fact, I was talking to one of my Democrat friends the other day. He told me very frankly he was going to vote for censure. He said, not because of the silly reasons given by the Watkins committee, he said, but because you labeled the Democrat party as the party of communism. You issued an open invitation during the army McCarthy hearings for people to continue to supply you with information.

That’s right. Regardless of its stamping. Are you getting new information from people in this administration? Let me change your question a bit. I invited them to give information of wrongdoing, graft, corruption, communism. I am continuing to get that information. Getting documents, too? Yes. Are you getting any more as a result of your appeals than you got beforehand? Has there been a flow build up as a result of that? It’d be pretty hard to say whether it has increased or decreased.

I’ve been so busy being investigated and preparing for this lynch bee starting tomorrow that I haven’t had an opportunity. You call a meeting of the United States Senate a lynch bee? Well, let’s call it the censure. No, but I’m interested in this because the Senate’s an institution of government. It’s part of the Congress. Let’s answer it, Bill. Let’s do. There are a great number of the Democrats who have indicated in private conversations that liberal censure mccarthy not because of what is in the Watkins report because of, I’ve labeled them as the party of communism, even though I have always pointed out that there are millions of Democrats who are good, loyal Americans and many officeholders here in Washington who are anti communists.

But there are those who feel that they should censure me not because I cross examined Wicker trying to find out, but a communist whom he promoted honorably discharged. There are some Republicans who feel likewise. Now, I consider that, yes, that’s a lynching bay. What? This is an orderly. When they’re not basing their vote upon the counts set forth, when they base their vote upon political reasons, when they say ahead of time, in effect, regardless of what the evidence says, this man has been fighting communism.

He’s been showing that over 20 years the Democrat party has been infiltrated, therefore, we’re going to get him. Well, now, senator, I think a lynching b is a good name for it. Bill, I think that’s a very. He didn’t look like he was nervous. He didn’t look like he was rattled. Quite the opposite. He looked like he was man under control. So he didn’t look like he looked like he was confident in what he was doing.

And he, you know, I think you rightly called out what it was. It was a lynching. It was a political lynching. It reminds me of, you know what? I’m going to play this because this is something that I watched, something that I watched yesterday. And it was actually sit, it was the liberal hive mind, actually. Let me see here. Mind. Here it is right here. I’m not going to play the whole thing, but I want to play a portion of it.

This is it right here. Okay. So I don’t know how many of you guys saw, and I’m not here trying to defend or attack or. This is not about Vivek Ramaswami. Okay? That’s not why I’m playing this, but what I’m going to play here is how the media is responding to the people on the right when they’re trying to give information. The media will ask a question. And Kathy, it wasn’t about slavery that Lincoln might not have been reelected if he hadn’t.

Yeah, welcome to the show, Kathy. Very nice. I’ve read that book, too. But I’m going to play this here real quick, and I want you to, so there’s going to be a little bit of, I’m actually going to speed it up a little bit here because I don’t want to make this about Ramaswami. I just want you guys to see the tactics that are used by the left.

All right, so that’s what I want you to pay attention here and I’m going to speed it up just for brevity, back to the point of my candidacy and the way I’m going to run this country. Trust the people with the truth. If it doesn’t match your narrative. Accountable. Starting to ground, gain traction with latino voters. Do not worry that your rhetoric is pushing them away. There are folks to the contrary.

I think we’re going to bring black people more concerned about your rhetoric. Well, you know what I have concerned about their corruption. How do those align with historical action? Is a debate that is being had. I think I will be better denying that racism is a, I’ve never denyed that racism a problem. If you listen to the response I gave to that black pastor, my whole point is racism has been a major problem for most of our national history.

Same reaction as last time. Can this supposed journalist please, for the love of all that is beautiful, stop talking. It’s the same thing every time. And he gets a lot of money from China. Why is that? And why aren’t people, I want to ask you, another investigation. You don’t know the subject. I do know this. He had one at University of Pennsylvania. I think it’s changed. I’m going to go ahead and interrupt you here because I’m not cherry picking examples too, constantly interjecting and attempting to fact check.

Okay. So what I wanted to show here was how every time that somebody is trying, that somebody on the right is trying to make a point, the media talk over them. They will not allow them to get a point in. They just absolutely will not allow them to get a point in. Yeah, well, just keep in mind that I was playing that at fast speed, not to show I wasn’t really so much focused on the words that were being spoken, but you could see that this individual is trying to talk.

And it wasn’t just him, it was Trump, too. There was multiple examples of these guys trying to talk and then the media just talking right over them because they will not allow them to get a word in edgewise. And that’s exactly what was happening. That’s exactly what happens here in many respects. As soon as you try to talk, if you go back to the thing about him, have you no decency? It’s like they were just talking right over him.

They won’t let him finish a sentence because if he tries to finish a sentence, they’re just going to talk over him. And it’s the same tactics that they’ve been using for 50, 60, 70 years. Anyway, that was the point that I was trying to show here. So getting back here, following in the text of the opening exchange in which the fearless senator, knowing what he was going to be politically assassinated the following day refused to yield an inch to the symbol of fake news.

Inquisition. Nader. I heard the moderator, face of the nation, Ted Coop. Now I’m not going to go through and read this because we watched it so there’s no point in even going through and doing it. When the Senate convened in a post election lame duck session to review and revise the final report issued in September a heated debate developed. McCarthy boldly confronted the committee and its work to keep the discussion as bipartisan as possible.

Minority, soon to be Majority Leader Lyndon B. Johnson, a known blackmailer, commanded his democrats to remain quiet and allow the Eisenhower Republicans to lead the fight to ruin McCarthy. McCarthy’s Senate defenders fought to defeat one of the counts associated with censure by arguing that McCarthy could not be censured for something he allegedly did during a previous congress in February in 1951 and that Zwicker incident was being way overblown.

Fighting until the end. McCarthy himself tagged the committee as the unwitting handmaiden of the Communist Party referred to as Senator Watkins actions as cowardly and denounced the entire proceeding as a lynch party chairman. Watkins responded with an emotional speech about the dignity of the Senate that brought the usual cheers from the crooks and idiots in the galleries. The Senate had recessed for ten days because McCarthy had entered the hospital with an elbow injury.

Finally, on December 2, 1954 after three more days of heated debate the Senate adjourned and dropped account relating to the McCarthy controversial exchange with General Zwicker for one regarding his adversarial behavior toward the Watkins committee. Now think about that for a moment and let it sink in. The lynching committee that was specifically formed to get McCarthy being unable to actually find an actual charge that they could stick to.

McCarthy, hence proving his accusations of a lynch party ended up charging McCarthy for having correctly called them a lynch party. Naturally, the Communist Party newspaper the Daily Worker applauded the recommendations of the Watkins committee as good news for America. If McCarthy was such a dangerous monster who hurt so many innocent people then why not charge and censure him for specific cases of such? But no. The Senate voted 67 to 22.

Some senators voted present to condemn McCarthy for calling out Eisenhower’s lynch party exactly for what it was, a lynch party. And the committee clowns actually left the word censure out of the final resolution. In addition to the aforementioned disrespect of the Watkins Lynch Committee, another account pertained to McCarthy’s failure to cooperate with an earlier failed Senate lynching attempt related to Senator Benton or Democrat of Kentucky or Connecticut.

Rather ridiculous motion to expel McCarthy back in 1951. So that’s why all the disrespectful drama was all about two counts against McCarthy for his disrespectful for and lack of cooperation with two separate politically motivated lynching committees. One from 51, another from 54. Now that’s what you call a witch hunt. By the way, McCarthy’s good friend Senator John F. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, managed to skip the historic censure vote by oh so conveniently scheduling an elective surgery on the very day of the lynching.

Communist defector Louise Boudins, who understood the inner workings of the communists better than anyone, warned that the condemnation of McCarthy would now leave the way open to intimidate any person of consequence who moves against the conspiracy. The communists made him their chief target because they wanted to make him a symbol to remind political leaders in America not to harm the conspiracy or its world conquest designs. History now confirms the sad truth of Boudin’s prophetic warning.

The combination of the media hyped censure vote engineered by Eisenhower and the recent loss of the Senate to a Democrat majority, also engineered by Eisenhower, meant that meant that McCarthy would soon be losing his chairmanship and his influence. The Democrat Senate majority that would reconvene in 1955 would be firmly under the control of the evil as hell LBJ. Aiding and abetting LBJ would be the republican moderates like Prescot Bush and Ralph Landers, who were under Eisenhower’s control.

As for that phony, gloating bastard in the White House who brought about McCarthy’s downfall, he quipped before his cabinet, McCarthyism is now. McCarthy was ism. And indeed it was. Let’s see, is there anything else? Chapter 16 of last year’s it is said by the fake historians that a broken Joe McCarthy became a drunken recluse after his condemnation. And that is why this author calls them fake historians. For, you see, had they bothered to do even the most basic original source research, they would soon learn that this oft represented lie is, like all other lies about McCarthy, a manufactured mendacity that fools pick up from another fool’s and then repeat for still more fools to hear and then repeated until becomes conventional wisdom.

Senator McCarthy continued to work hard at his duties and to fight communism as if the censure never happened. L. Britz Bozell, co author of McCarthy and his enemies as well as one of McCarthy’s aides during that time stated, to insist, as some have, that McCarthy was a shattered man after the censure is sheer nonsense. His intellect was sharp as ever. When he addressed himself to a problem he was perfectly capable of dealing with it.

Now a member of the Debald Republican Senate or the Debald Republican Senate minority that was intimidated by Eisenhower and without his power chairmanship anymore McCarthy mainly relied upon public speeches to alert the public to the menace of communism. He delivered a number of important addresses from 1955 to 57 and still had an enormous following and mailing list. Yes, his chairmanship power was gone but there was no sign of surrender at all in the fighting Irishmen and half German.

In 1956, McCarthy stood alone in calling for direct aid for the brave hungarian freedom fighters that had overthrown their communist masters and then pleaded with the United States and Europe for arms and supplies in order to safeguard their anti communist revolution. But Eisenhower, as he had done throughout his entire career sold out the nationalists by not only refusing to send aid but directly ordering Americans, western Europe puppet states not to lift a finger.

Thus, emboldened by Ike’s latest treason, soviet tanks rolled into Hungary and crushed the revolt that McCarthy wanted to protect. I don’t even want to look at that picture. I can already tell it’s going to be brutal. I don’t want to see it. McCarthy was also virtually alone and if you guys want to see it you can get the book and look at it yourself. McCarthy was also virtually alone in the warning that the Soviet Union was winning the missile race because well concealed communists in the United States government are putting the brakes on our own guided missile program.

When McCarthy’s friend, the Democrat John F. Kennedy was to run for president 1960 against Ike’s VP Richard Nixon, he too raised the issue of the missile gap and it really pissed Eisenhower off. McCarthy was also prophetic in urging the Eisenhower administration to allow the asiatic peoples to fight for their to fight to free their countrymen from communist slavery in red China, North Korea and North Vietnam. Injustice to them and injustice to them and injustice to the millions of american boys who will otherwise be called upon to sacrifice their lives in the total war against communism.

We must permit our fighting allies with our material and technical assistance to carry the fight to the enemy. This was not permitted. Instead, Eisenhower sent military advisors to Vietnam while issuing goofy warnings about communist domino effect in Far east. About a decade later, more than a half a million american servicemen would be fighting and dying in South Vietnam, sent there by Ike’s main democrat conspirator behind the enemy, behind the anti McCarthy vote of 1954.

President LBJ, in spite of what his past and present enemies would have you believe, the fact is Joseph McCarthy did not drink himself to death seriously. Now, had McCarthy drank as much as the communists and globalists allege for as many years as they allege, he would have had to be carried in and out of the Senate hearings. Did McCarthy ever look or act drunk during the grueling televised army McCarthy hearings? To the contrary, he was always cool, calm and collected, articulate and very sharp minded.

Those who knew him confirmed that he enjoyed a few drinks from time to time and even got tipsy now and again. It’s an irish thing. But there are no witness accounts, neither from friend nor enemies of him drinking during working hours. No drunk could have accomplished what he accomplished. The preparation, the hearings, the speeches, the traveling and the writing. And even during the last two years of his life with McCarthy surely disappointed over the cruel and cowardly injustice his Senate colleagues had done him, continued to fight communism in his public life while enjoying his private life.

In January of 1957, McCarthy and his wife adopted a baby girl, Tierney McCarthy. A picture of Roy Cohn’s book shows a smiling McCarthy holding his new daughter. It’s simply not the image of a man drowning in despair and alcoholism. The incame on May 2, 1957, in Bethesda Naval Hospital, the same dreadful place where McCarthy’s mentor, James Forrestal, had been suicided in 1949, he, at the age of just 48.

McCarthy’s death certificate listed the cause as hepatitis. Acute cause unknown. Oh, what simple child’s play it would have been for Dulles CIA to poison McCarthy and then have its fake news. Shout, his liver, his liver, his liver. As they whispered, drunk, drunk, drunk. The Eisenhower sent their condolences to the McCarthy widow. The following day, New York Times ran a prayed story of McCarthy’s death, which contained this buried little gem of mystery.

There was a number of mysterious angles about Senator McCarthy’s final illness. When he first entered the hospital, Mrs. McCarthy said it was for treatment of an old knee injury. But as his condition became more serious, the hospital described his ailment as hepatitis. This is an internal ailment. But the reports from the hospital were that he was being treated in a neurology ward. Emphasis added. Bad knee or bad liver? Such changing stories are typically an indicator of foul play.

In addition, no autopsy was performed. Can your author here prove that McCarthy was assassinated? No, I cannot do I know in my intuitive gut I do. And they just missed killing him on the communist globalist holy day of May 1. By a matter of hours, Tailgunner Joe fought off the poison a bit too hard, perhaps. McCarthy was given a state ceremony attended by 70 senators, many of them no doubt remorseful over having caved in to betray him.

A traditional catholic mass was held before a hundred priests and 2000 others at Washington St. Matthew’s Cathedral. Thousands viewed the body in Washington before he was taken to St. Mary’s parish cemetery in Appleton, Wisconsin. In Appleton, an estimated 17,000 local mourners filed through the church to pay their last respects. Three republican senators, George W. Malone, William E. Jenner and Herman Welker had also flown from Washington to Wisconsin on the plane carrying McCarthy’s casket.

Future Senator Robert F. Kennedy also attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was survived by his wife Jean and their recently adopted daughter, Tierney. A few months later, a special election was held to fill McCarthy Senate seat. The republican primary was won by Walter Kohler, an immensely wealthy Kohler fawcets pro Eisenhower Republican who called for a clean break from Karthi’s approach. The ungrateful fools chose Kohler over a former congressman, Glenn Robert Davis, who had charged that Eisenhower was too soft on communism.

The Democrat primary was won by William Proxmeyer, who called the late McCarthy a disgrace to Wisconsin, to the Senate, and to America. Proxmeyer would win the general election and go on to hold the seat for 32 years. The seat is today held by the nasty marxist lesbian Tammy Baldwin. Tragic irony chapter 17 history vindicates Joe comments a 16th century author and english courier named John Harrington once wisely and poetically observed, treason doth never prosper.

What’s the reason? Why? If it’s prosper, none dare call it treason. In other words, once traitorous subversives have accomplished their objective, who would dare to call them traitors once they are in full control? Has America, and by extension its puppet European Union reached the point in which the traders are now the open masses? Barring some miraculous 11th hour salvation by patriotic elements of the United States military, it certainly does seem that the left one worlders have become invincible.

Heck, even many people calling themselves conservative have fully accepted many communist ideas, including the belief that McCarthy was a bad man. Some american history since McCarthy, most decent Americans over the age of 40 already knew that, already know that Fidel Castro was a brutal communist dictator who ruined the once developing island nation of Cuba, driving its mostly white upper and middle class to flee to Florida while the communist state and its rabble hordes disposed of any productive Cubans who stayed.

One more interest to study one more interest to students of real history is the long since forgotten story of how Eisenhower State Department and the New York slimes dusted off the badly defeated rebel, put him back on his feet, and helped to install him as dictator. That’s right, boys and girls. Without the maneuvering of Salzburger slimes, namely the pro communist correspondent Herbert Matthews and the Eisenhower Doll’s Mafia Philo Castro’s marxist revolution of 1959 would never have succeeded.

In February of 1957, the fugitive Castro invited Matthews down to Cuba for a one on one interview. Ruby Phillips, the New York slimes correspondent in Cuba, was told through a communist contact that Castro wanted to meet with a big name reporter. An interview with Matthews was arranged and held in secret so that cuban president Fulgincio Bautista would not find out about their meeting place and thus capture Castro.

Matthews’interview confirmed that Castro, contrary to what the cuban movement had been claiming for strategic purposes, was indeed still alive. This news gave the demoralized communists of Cuba hope that the revolution could continue. Matthews also claimed that Castro’s force was much bigger and more powerful than previously thought because Castro and Matthews understood how surprising the news of his survival would be. They took a picture together. Batista, still trying to crush the communist revolution, claimed the photo was a fake and that Castro really was dead.

Of course newspapers lie. Of course the newspaper lies on their own would not have been sufficient to topple the pro american, anti communist government of Cuba. Newspapers only make propaganda, not the actual policy. The slimes goal was to give the lame duck globalist Eisenhower the protective cover that he needed to turn Cuba from a nationalist to a marxist, just as he, as General Eisenhower had done to eastern Europe at the end of World War II.

Eisenhower’s treason was resented by the man who would follow him, the anti communist friend of the late Joe McCarthy, John F. Kennedy. The Jackie Kennedy tapes later revealed that JFK agreed with the view of one of their family friends, Ambassador Earl E. T. Smith, that the slimes and the State Department were mainly responsible for the fall of Bautista and the triumph of Castro. Smith wrote that the Eisenhower State Department facilitated Bautista’s downfall by withdrawing support for his government.

Smith also claimed that until certain portions of the american press began to write derogatory articles against the Batista government, the Castro revolution never got off its first base. He added. Matthews eulogized Fidel Castro, portrayed him as a political Robin Hood, and compared him to Abraham Lincoln, and that the fourth floor at State Department had a close association with Matthews, who gave the impression by his editorial conduct of advocating Batista’s downfall.

Jackie revealed how her husband thought it was awful that Eisenhower had allowed Castro to visit the United States after his seizure of power in Cuba. She went on to cite Smith’s book, the fourth floor, of how the Senate department, or, excuse me, of how the State Department, emboldened since Eisenhower’s destruction and murder of Joe McCarthy just a few years earlier, had paved the way for Castro’s takeover. Oh, if only McCarthy, dead for less than two years, had been alive to witness this, what holy hell would he have raised? And then the murder of the Kennedy brothers.

We previously reviewed the little known fact that John and Robert Kennedy were both friends and supporters of Joe McCarthy. Had either one of Joe’s anti communist boys been able to occupy the White House for eight years, it is possible that the globalist conspiracy against America might have been checked, if not outright destroyed. Without digressing too much from the subject of this writing, just let us say that it is very interesting to make note that the brothers Kennedy were both, we strongly believe, murdered by the same deed.

State operatives that murdered, we strongly believe, McCarthy. All three men were killed in their forty s in nineteen ninety nine. JFK Jr. Died in a small plane crash at age 38, conveniently allowing Hillary Clinton to capture the New York Senate that would have been his for the taking. Soon after the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, orchestrated by the western and russian globalists for the purpose of swallowing the shattered remnants of the russian splintered superstate, much of the state archives preserved by Moscow Russian center for the Preservation and Study of documents in recent history were opened up to the western scholars.

Some are what some of the researchers, some of them Ivy League libtards, discovered shocked them. It turned out that soviet espionage had been far more extensive and high placed in the United States and the UK than official history had recognized. One american historican from Yale remarked, based upon our review of these documents, whose authenticity is beyond doubt, the history of american anti communism needs to be rewritten. Evidently, the poor naive professor from Yale still has no idea that a globalist mafia had not only allowed the red infestation to occur, but was still controlling the government, the press and academia.

There was no chance in hell that any revision of history would vindicate McCarthy, would ever be taught in schools or universities. Modern establishment scholars of the Cold War, in a bizarre display of double think, fully accept the stunning revelations revealed in the soviet archives, yet still maintain that McCarthy was somehow evil, or that at least partially evil. This headline and an except from a 1996 article appearing in very pro establishment Washington Post illustrates this.

Prominent at this point very well was McCarthy. Write about the left by Nicholas von Hoffman, April 14, 1996. The materials that first made their way to the surface in the early 1990s records provided proofs, proof, past paradventure, that the Communist Party in the United States was subsidized by the soviet government and used as a base for extensive espionage. So now liberals must face the question, was Joe McCarthy right? Could all the defiant politicians, the martyrs to the civil liberties, the blacklisted teachers, and the entertainers with earnest professors and sincere foundation executives have been wrong? The answer is no.

And yes. Actually, the answer is just yes. But thanks anyway to Mr. Hoppin for a fine article available online. We have to understand that he, writing for the compost, couldn’t come out as a full blown McCarthyite. The reason for such qualification is simple. You see, the Soviet Union no longer exists, and the Communist Party USA, though it still exists, is but a remnant of its former glory. However, the self perpetuating London, Paris, Brussels, New York, Washington.

Globalist mafia, which used and latter discarded the communist party operatives of that time, is still here and wreaking havoc within the world. Because that NWo mafia had become McCarthy’s ultimate target, his name cannot be cleared, no matter what. Mainstream academics can be safely acknowledged about soviet espionage. In 1995, the secret information contained in the Vinona intercepts was finally declassified. The Vinoda project was a counterintelligence program initiated by the United States Army Intelligence Service, known as the National Security Agency.

The reprogram ran from 1934 to 1980. Excuse me, 1943 until 1980. Man, I was bad when I say 34. Little dyslexic. Maybe. The purpose of the Vanona was to decrypt messages transmitted by the intelligence agencies of the Soviet Union. During the long duration of the program, the signal intelligence service intercepted about 3000 soviet messages and was able to decrypt some of them. The discoveries included the Cambridge five espionage ring in the UK and the soviet espionage of the Manhattan project in the United States.

For the soviet atomic bomb project. The vanilla project, which even us presidents didn’t know about, remained secret for 15 years after it concluded. When the decoded soviet messages were declassified and published, McCarthy claims of high level red penetration were again proved correct. Naturally, the fake news and the fake historians for the most part downplayed the new information. For a good summary of the Vanona story, we recommend the following books.

The Vanona secrets by Romerstein and Brendel and or Vanona decoding soviet espionage in America by Hayes and Kohler. The globalist’s own words since McCarthy. Trust me on this one, boys and girls, your authors of voluminous cyber archives contain as many as 100 verifiable quotes from famous and powerful people, both pro and con, clearly confirming the existence of a one world government movement, the New World order. The globalist movement is very real.

Their own words prove that the conspiracy which McCarthy sacrificed his life to expose is very real. Here are just a few. 1966 Georgetown University professor and mentor, students and future president Bill Clinton’s professor Carol Quigley. There does exist and has existed for a generation and international network which operates to some extent in the way the radical right believes, the communist act. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for 20 years and was permitted for two years in the early sixty s to examine the papers and secret records.

I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have for much of my life been close to it. I’ve been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected to a few of its policies. But in general, my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown. And I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

And the powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands, able to dominate the political systems of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. The system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion, in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world, acting in concert by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.

1999 legendary CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite, while accepting the Norman Cousins Globalist Governance award from the openly pro world government World Federalist association, it seems to many of us that we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict, we must strengthen the United nations as a first step toward a world government with a legislature, executive and judiciary and police to enforce the international foundation laws and keep the peace.

We Americans are going to have to yield up some of our sovereignty that’s going to be to many a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith, and a lot of persuasion for them to come along with us on this necessity. 1999. Then first lady Hillary Clinton congratulating cronkite on his World Government award. Good evening and congratulations, Walter, on receiving the World Federalist Association’s global governance record.

For the first decades, you told us the way it is. But tonight we honor you for fighting the way it could be. 2007 Russian President Vladimir Putin opposed to the new world order the unipolar world refers to a world in which there is one master, one sovereign, and one central of authority. There’s one center of force, one center of decision making, thus its own pernicious and its basis.

There could be no moral foundations for modern civilization. More from Putin some people are constantly insisting on the necessity to divide up our country and are trying to spread this theory. There are those who would like to build a unipolar world, who would themselves like to rule all of humanity. Minor countries under pressure from larger ones are having a hard time figuring out how to defend their own interests.

And Russia has played, and will continue to play a positive, stabilizing role in the world. 2016 american future President Donald Trump opposed to the new World order we will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism. I am skeptical of international unions that tie up and bring America down. And under my administration, we will never enter America into any agreement that reduces our ability to control our own affairs.

The nation state remains the true foundation of happiness and harmony. Now you know why Trump and Putin, like McCarthy, are subject to so many nastiness from the fake news. The one world order is not a conspiracy theory anymore. If powerful operators such as Walter Cockeye and Hillary Clinton admit to it, it’s a conspiracy fact. McCarthy foresaw the importance of the war for education. That’s why he closed his 1952 booklet with a prophetic warning about what he described as the most dangerous aspect of the marxist globalist threat of all, namely, their growing control over education.

He urged readers to take action against an evil educational cancer, which was not yet so visible and complete back then. But it was very clear and pervasive throughout all levels of education today. McCarthy on education every man and woman in America can appoint himself or herself to undo damage which is being done by communist minded teachers and communist line textbooks. Countless times I have heard parents throughout the country complain that their sons and daughters were sent to college as good Americans and return four years later as wild eyed radicals.

The education system of this country cannot be cleansed for communist influence by the education or influence by legislation. It can only be scrubbed and flushed and swept clean. If the mothers and fathers and the sons and daughters of this nation individually decide to do this job, this can be your greatest contribution to America. This is a job which you must do if America and western civilization are to live.

I warn you, however, that the task will not be a pleasant one when you detect and start expose a teacher with a communist mind. You will be damned and smeared. You will be accused of endangering academic freedom. Remember, to those communist minded teachers, academic freedom means their right to force you to hire them to teach your children and a philosophy in all which you do not believe. To the communist minded teachers, academic freedom means their right to deny the freedom to hire loyal Americans to teach your children.

We cannot win the fight against communism if communist minded professors are teaching your children. We cannot lose the fight against communism if loyal Americans are teaching your children. Substitute the term globalist for communists and the situation still applies today only 100 times worse. It is mainly college educated voters who are the most brainwashed and closed minded brockheads of all when it comes to the understanding of political, historical, economic and cultural matters.

That’s interesting that they say that, because I, you know, I, I think it’s true. You know, you look at the, you look at the college educated people, and I don’t know about you guys, but for me, when I hear about people who go to college and, oh, well, I have a degree, it’s like, I don’t know about you, but I kind of feel like. I feel bad for them.

I’m like, okay, so you were brainwashed to be stupid, so you either paid money or were given a free education to basically come out as a Marxist. It’s despicable. But, yeah, I don’t, I don’t look at people who say that they have an education, they’re a college graduate. I don’t look at them as more intelligent. I actually look at them as more stupid. And I don’t know, maybe that’s just cynicism on my part, but that’s generally the way I feel.

The intolerant liberalism of so many thousands of model american college professors coupled with the paralyzing political philosophical stupidity of so many millions of libtard university graduates, constitutes perhaps the single strongest argument in favor of the vindication of Joseph McCarthy. The final proof is in the pudding. Documenting the facts of the treason which McCarthy gave his life to expose is important for understanding both the past and the present, which grew out of the past.

But the final confirmation of McCarthy’s truth can be established without the need for the sifting through dusty archives or code breaking or secret messages. The proof is in the pudding of the present day. Have a look at the world today as compared to the 1950s. Can anyone doubt that a destructive cultural, economic and political revolution has taken place, albeit gradually? Indeed, if we could take a time machine, ride back in time and pluck a well meaning anti McCarthy libtard out of 1954 and instantly transport him to 2018.

The shock of seeing the changes for the worse are all in one incident would convert him back into a believer in just a matter of hours. Here is a partial list of the communist globalist engineered progress that our friend from the 1950s would observe today, progress which would have been absolutely unimaginable in his day or even as recently as 1975. Average american wage earners have a total of 50% of their income confiscated directly through federal, state and local taxes and indirectly through business taxes and regulatory costs passed on to consumers.

A $22 trillion in growing national debt with an annual interest carrying cost to taxpayers of about $250,000,000,000. A federal mandate which imposes fines on poor people who cannot afford health insurance. Fines repealed in 2018 by Trump a government which now does anything it wants to, while the civilians can only act with permission of the state the nation’s elderly being killed off with morphine overdoses as to free up resources for illegal aliens and recent immigrants from the third world as many as 35 million Americans on food stamps at any given time.

Illegal aliens voting in elections and inner city blacks voting multiple times as whites, out of fear of being labeled racist, remain silent. Explicit sexual content and outrageous indecency permitting all forms of Hollywood entertainment and music homosexuality and cross dressing fully normalized with child molestation being set up for future here tens of millions of babies, toddlers and young children raised in government subsidized daycare centers because mommy has to work full time state imposed atheism in elementary schools homosexuality and transgenderism presented in schools as positive lifestyles genital mutilation surgeries, gender reassignment paid for by taxpayers body parts of aborted babies sold openly the White House lit up in homosexual rainbow colors to celebrate the state imposed acceptance of marriage between two people of the same sex.

Bankers, photographers and welding planners being fined and harassed for life or night happened or night is my spot. Genitalian laser body parts sold openly. The White House same sex to celebrate the self imposed exoticism between two people the same sex bakers, photographers and weding planners being fined harassed by the state for refusing to service homosexual weddings amoxified Europe EU under a single political and economic system. Open borders for the United States and Europe endless wars and other acts of aggression against innocent peoples white populations heading for minority status everywhere collapsing rates of marriage and childbirth among white millennials 40% of children born out of wedlock, meaning mainly the poor mothers open and proud promotion of Marxism at the nation’s universities proud advertised racial quotas, diversity that discriminated against whites when it comes to employment, grants and college admissions.

Pervasive denigration of american history and its racist founders. Fake news that is far worse than it ever was under McCarthy’s day. A continuous assault upon and chipping away at the right to own firearms. Open calls for global governance by political and religious leaders. Open calls for carbon tax and promotions by the global warming hopes. The deliberate offshoring of goods paying us manufacturing jobs. Admitted Marxists rising to high public offices and running for the president as Democrats, Senator Bernie Sanders and more, much more.

None of that mass insanity, stupidity, low wage poverty and moral depravity came about by accident. It happened. And it’s still getting worse because the powers that be behind the new world order, the ultimate targets of McCarthyism, wanted it this way. That’s what Joe McCarthy tried to show us. But not enough people were awake. After having thus been immersed in today’s sick and twisted reality, our time traveling friend would surely on bended knee, hands clasped with tearful eyes and quivering voice, much like the character George Bailey from the Christmas classic it’s a wonderful life.

Plead with us, please. Please take me back to 1954. Take me back, I beg you. I must warn all my friends and family that McCarthy was right after all. And indeed he was. Rest in peace, Saint Joe of Wisconsin. And may the truth of your holy crusade one day be understood far and wide before it’s too late. And that is. That’s very interesting. Sorry, somebody earlier asked about my eyes.

And boy, when I’m reading this, it’s a little bit of a challenge, I’m not going to lie. But I do enjoy this. I really do. I really enjoy doing things. I’m really enjoying Mike’s work. One of the things I find very interesting about his work is he backs up everything that he says. There’s a source for it. There’s a source for everything that he does. If there’s ever even a remote doubt in his mind as to what he’s writing, he won’t put it out there as factual information.

So. Well, guys, that is that for tonight. I’m going to let you all go enjoy the remainder of your Sunday evening, and tomorrow we’ll start a new one. I think what I may do this week is I may show some more of those. I think I’m going to show a few things that are going to be video oriented in reference to some of the weather underground and some of the, some of the terrorist stuff.

I think it’s important to see that, because that’s what we’ve been fighting. And that’s kind of what the fight that is culminating. I think that’s what’s coming. And even though a lot of the stuff is older, I still feel it’s relevant because that is what. It’s just a continuation on today from what it was 1015 2030, 40 years ago. Thank you. Appreciate it. Just like the Zionists in Berlin before World War II.

Exactly. And J Pog, I finished my degree 30 years after high school. And I have to say I did learn a thing that I didn’t already. My. I never even finished my degree. I was going to go to pharmacy school. And I’m like, no. Hell no. I don’t want them to do. I just. I didn’t do. I’m. I. Well, I’ve never seen Mr. Truth bomb thing on McCarthy, but I will check it out.

Actually, that might be a good thing to show tomorrow night. Let’s see. Just kind of going back up through the chat here. Just another connection. I saw an old interview with Cohen and Toad. There’s a lot of stuff you guys are saying in the chat and I missed here. Okay, let’s see. Voting section. I don’t think we’ve ever had a clue. I don’t know if we’ve. Yeah, you know what? I think we have had some clean elections, but I think the ones that were super important were manipulated.

I mean, if you think about it, that’s the whole point of why they went to. That’s why they introduced the 17th amendment. And that’s why they introduced Reynolds v. Sims, the 17th amendment. And I know I harp on this a lot, but the 17th amendment was what changed the. It neutered the states. The states no longer had representation at the federal government level. What it did is it made senators be nothing but just glorified House of Representatives because the people of the state voted for the senate as opposed to the senators as opposed to the state governments, appointing the senators.

Then the. So the state senate would have. The state senate would have a senator that they represent or that they put forth, and then the state house or legislature would have a senator that they would. And it went that back and forth, and that was the way it was supposed to be. And the 17th amendment nullified all that and made senators elections based on a popular vote of the people, which is not the way it was supposed to be.

And then Reynolds v. Sims, the county is supposed to have, your local county is supposed to have a senate representative represent senate representation at the state senate level. And Reynolds v. Sims destroyed that back in the 1960s, mid 1960s. And now you have the senators. The state senators are now based on population control or population like district lines that are not the lines of the county, but the lines of.

I always use California as an example because California has 58 counties. And if you had each individual county having a senatorial representative at the California standard level, then you would pretty much have a conservative senate. But because now it’s all based on lines of population, just La county alone, which is not a very big county from a land perspective, has 13 senators in the state of California. 13.

Because again, the California Senate is now, or the Senate. The Senate in California is now based on population, not county lined. So a lot of very interesting stuff. So. But anyway, all right, everybody. Well, I appreciate all you guys for sticking around and having patience with me. We’ll do a few more interesting things this week. Next weekend, just giving you a heads up. Monday or, excuse me, Saturday.

Next Saturday, I’m actually going to be driving out to Texas and I’ll be in Texas for like five days. I’ll be gone for five days. I’ll be on the road for one, there for three, and then on the road again coming out to, I’m heading out to see, so out in, uh, I’ll probably do a show or two from his place, but I’m going to be kicking it with Nina next week for several, uh, let’s see here in Pa, they have crazy lines that conservatives are.

Yeah, exactly. Well, that’s the whole point of redistricting. Yeah. Yarn. I agree. Well, I kind of knew some of that stuff, but I didn’t know to the degree that it was, that was really bad. It was bad. It was difficult to read this. It really was. Especially the stuff, I mean, the first night that I started reading this and I was reading all the stuff that they had done with the communists.

Oh my God, this is brutal. That’s why when I was looking at that thing with the weather underground and a lot of that stuff, it just makes so much more sense because it’s just more continuous trying to cause upheaval. Just continuous revolution. Continuous revolution. All right, y’all, you all have a wonderful Sunday evening and I will see you guys tomorrow night. I’ll have something really cool to do.

And then Tuesday we’ll have the constitution class at 04:00 p. m. , Pacific, seven eastern. And then Tuesdays with Mike will be at immediately following. So have a great night, everybody, and we will see you mana. Peace. .