How Lawfare Is Crippling Western Patriots Who Oppose Mass Immigration

➡ Ron Partain of the Untold History Channel discussed the ongoing issue of illegal immigration and its impact on various world governments. He highlighted key communal factors, such as rights’ dogma and guilt, that are hindering countries like the U.S., UK, and member states of the EU in coping with these immigration waves. Partain also shed light on a seemingly crippling effect of lawfare in these countries and referenced the Kalergy plan, linking it to these immigration issues.
➡ The text discusses a conspiracy theory known as the Kalergi plan, which claims that there is an attempt to eliminate white people and replace them with a populace devoid of identity to be ruled by a Jewish elite. This theory is used by far-right individuals to argue against immigration policies in Europe and the US. However, it’s debunked by various sources including independent newspapers and anti-racism advocacy groups who label it as a racist hoax. The text also considers human rights, critiquing certain interpretations, and developments over time.
➡ This text discusses the complexities of human rights, immigration, and ethnic tensions. It scrutinizes historical and contemporary approaches, mentioning China’s relative view on human rights as well as the impact of white European guilt over colonialism and slavery. The text highlights potential shifts in migrant demographics, which could result in Europe gaining a more diverse population. The writer also examines racial disparities in areas such as crime and educational attainment, and it outlines various efforts and conflicts related to immigration policies.
➡ The text discusses racial issues in the UK and the US, then moves to a discussion about multiculturalism and immigration. The writer conveys concern about the potential erasure of white culture due to evolving demographic shifts, suggesting these changes could be intentional. They reference the ‘Kalergy plan’, which they believe is an agenda to eliminate white populations, and encourage the reader to research it. The author debates historical context and ends questioning society’s agenda, expressing a hope for next week to be smoother, while interjecting interactions from a live chat discussion.
➡ The speaker is discussing perspectives on interracial representation in media, noting the visible increase in interracial couples and often dominant female characters. They express concern over what they perceive as forced presentation and undermine social unity. They also share personal anecdotes about geographical knowledge, map studying hobby, and observations from the animal world implying inherent segregation in nature. The speaker is currently residing in California due to their elderly mother and ends with future streaming plans.

And welcome, everybody, to the Untold History Channel. My name is Ron Partain. It’s been a crazy day. I wanted to do this much earlier and life just throws curveballs at me, or has been last week or so. This is going to be long one and I’m not 100% sure that I’m going to be able to get through it all tonight as a result of something that I kind of have to do here, maybe in about an hour and 20 minutes or so.

So if I’m not done, there will be a part two of this. I’ll just pause it and then finish it up because it’s like a 2500 word article. But I think it’s really interesting talking about how lawfare is essentially crippling people in both the United States and in Europe from preventing them from stopping the government, or at least that’s how I understand it, from essentially flooding our country and destroying our countries, western Europe and the United States, a couple household or house cleaning items.

Just want to remind everybody that Monday night is going to be the David Curtis thing at 07:00 p. m. . Eastern. So I’m looking forward to that and I’m trying to build up just some excitement for that. I don’t expect everybody to agree with him. But I would like for people who disagree to come in here and ask questions. Because the people who do disagree and when they ask questions, you may not be convinced, but I’m a big believer that the people who are listening to the debate the people who are listening to debate are going to get something out of it.

Whether you get something out of it or not. And the people who ask the questions, a lot of times people who are most people are afraid to ask questions because they’re afraid to look stupid. I’m not one of those people, but I don’t know every question that everybody’s going to have. I want people to jump in and ask questions and hard questions just because I want I want that to happen.

I want it to be a good show and not necessarily from a contentious perspective, but from the perspective of getting the most out of it. But anyway, that is Monday night at 07:00 P. m. . And with that said, I’m going to jump right in here because I don’t have a lot of time. Well, I may not have a lot of time tonight. We’ll see, but let’s go ahead and get the party started here.

I ate something right before I went live. I had something that was a little bit more spicy than I had anticipated, and my mouth was on fire. And I had to go get some crackers just because I was like, man, that was one of those sneaky spices that it’s like, you don’t really think anything of it, and then the next thing you know, your mouth’s on fire. That was why I was a little bit late.

So apologize for that, guys. All right, so let’s jump right into this since we’re running short on time. Let’s see, what is this? I’m at 300. Okay, let me do okay, let’s see here. There are currently three worldwide waves of illegal immigration roaring up the beach. The wave coming north and west from Africa and the Middle East, across the Mediterranean to the European Union. The smaller but still dramatic wave of illegals coming across the English Channel from the EU into the UK, which is no longer in the EU.

And the wave roaring up through Central America to our southern border and across the banks of the Rio Grande. The three waves involve different governments with different approaches. That first wave, the one crashing in on the EU, is of course, the concern of the EU government. The EU government, however, is a flimsy and ineffectual thing, always being buffeted here and there by the politics of the member states.

So this is politically the most complicated of the three waves, responsibility for dealing with the second smaller wave, the one heading north across the English Channel, falls on the UK government. And the third wave, the one right now drowning our southern border, is all ours. So how are these governmental authorities, the EU and its member states, the UK and the United States, how are they dealing with these three great waves of people from the Latrine pit countries seeking security and prosperity for themselves in our advanced liberal democracies? Of course, we don’t have democracies.

Well, they may, but we don’t. They’re doing badly, really badly. Why is there a common factor, is there some one thing in the public life of Germany, France, Italy, the UK and the United States that’s preventing them from coping with these great waves? I think I could name at least two, maybe three common factors. One, the dogma of rights, as in civil rights and human rights. See below.

Two, guilt. The most of the people riding these waves into our country inspire guilt one way or another. In white Europeans. Their ancestors were subject of our colonial or imperial administrations. Or in the case of blacks, people of their race were slaves of whites. We feel bad about that. Of all that, and want to make amends, three, or possibly a sub factor of number two, is white ethnomaticism.

This second factor leaves open the question why do white European nations that were not players or not big players in colonialism or slavery seem to suffer from that same guilt as Americans? Brits or Frenchmen Germany? You can explain because of some small colonial adventures in Africa and lingering guilt over racial persecutions in the Third Reich. But what about what explains sweden first writes lawfare, certainly a big player.

I’ve been reading Douglas Murray’s excellent piece in the November 23 issue of the London Spectator, politicians can’t win on illegal immigration. I think I’ll have to read that. But I’m sure he’ll touch a little bit on that. Here, Murray explains a point has been puzzling a lot of us. He states the point as a question. Europeans will vote for politicians who want to stop the migration. Those politicians may even come into office.

But the situation will not change. How can this be? The prime example here italy’s prime minister. Georgia Maloney. She was elected just a year ago on a strongly conservative platform, in particular promising to curtail illegal immigration. She has proven unable to do so. As we’ve been reporting here, the Italian island of Lampedusa has in the last couple of weeks had so many illegals coming in from North Africa, they now outnumber the island’s Italian population by more than three to one.

Why couldn’t Maloney do anything to prevent this? Why is she now shunting all these illegals to Sicily and mainland Italy instead of deporting them to Africa? By way of an answer, Douglas Murray reminds us of Mateo Salvini, who was Italy’s Minister of the interior, roughly equivalent to our attorney general, 2018 to 19 and is today a deputy prime minister. Salvini was strong on illegal immigration when NGOs or non governmental organizations, which is to say do gooder outfits funded like the likes of George Soros, rescued illegal aliens at sea in the Mediterranean and brought them to Italy, salvini wouldn’t let them land.

That got Salvini prosecuted in the Italian courts twice in February 2020 and again in July that year. The charges were of kidnapping the illegals. These charges came to nothing but other than lawsuits followed. But other lawsuits followed. And of course, in politics and political lawsuits, the process is the punishment. So probably Douglas Murray surmises georgia Maloney nurses a very reasonable fear that if she takes divisive action against the invaders, she’ll quickly find herself giving all or giving over all her time and money to lawfare launched against her by plaintiffs beating about human rights.

I haven’t read this yet, but I don’t know if any of you guys are familiar with the Kalergy plan. Does anybody here know about the Kalergy plan? I’ll come back to that, but put in the chat if you guys are familiar with the give you I’m just going to stop here for a quick, like a three minute summation of the Kalergy plan. So the Kalergy plan was something that was let me see if I can find something about the Caloric plan that’s like a really brief synopsis plan.

Now, this is going to be from Wikipedia, so it’s going to come about it from the content of its conspiracy theory. Well, if it’s in Wikipedia and they’re saying it’s conspiracy theory, then you can better believe that it’s probably true. The Kalergy plan, sometimes called the Kodeheven Kalergi conspiracy, is a far right anti Semitic white genocide conspiracy theory that claims that Austrian Japanese politician Richard von Gutenhoe Kalergy concocted a plot to mix white Europeans with other races via immigration.

The conspiracy theory is most often associated with european groups and parties, but it has also spread to North American politics. The conspiracy theory stems from a section of Kalergy’s 1925 book Practical Idealism, in which he predicted that a mixed race of the future would arise. The man of the future would be of mixed race. Today’s, races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice.

The Eurasian negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of people with a diversity of individuals. Modern far right individuals seek to draw relationships between contemporary European policymakers and this quote austrian neo Nazi writer Gerd Hosnik wrote about the subject of his book the whole the whole point. And remember the Protocols of the Elders of Zion? Remember we talked about the Protocols of Zion? The independent Italian newspaper Linkistia investigated the conspiracy and described it as a hoax, which is comparable to the fabricated anti Semitic document.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the Southern Poverty Law center, describes the Kalergy plan as a distinctly European way of pushing the white genocide conspiracy theory on the continent. The white national is quoting Kalergy’s writings out of context in order to assert that the European Union’s immigration policies were insidious plots that were hatched decades ago in order to destroy white people. Hope Not Hate, an anti racism advocacy group, has described it as a racist conspiracy theory, which alleges that Kalergy intended to influence Europe’s policies on immigration in order to create a populace devoid of identity, which would then supposedly be ruled by a Jewish elite.

All right, so based on what I just read there and taking into consideration some of the things that I have played on my channel over the course of the last month, I think it’s fair to say that whatever this is, whatever they’re trying to deny, is absolute truth. I saw a clip the other day of Bibi Netanyahu when he talked about how they weren’t taking in any refugees at all.

In fact, they were. People that were in there were like getting kicked to the curb and and hunted down and kicked out. But it’s okay. And it’s almost demanded of all of the Western European countries and United States to take in as many illegals as possible. And I think it was Sarkozy, who was the president of France at the time, who said that it was France’s women’s duty to mate with men from the mean.

The whole point of this is to completely do away with white people. Now take it with a grain of salt. I tend to believe that’s true. Talking about the white guilt, it’s okay. According to the woke culture, it’s okay to have black only clubs. It’s okay to have Latino only clubs. It’s okay to have clubs and groups that get together that are singular raced. But the only race that doesn’t have any privileges on that front are people who are white everybody else.

No, it’s fair game. You can do whatever you want. You can exclude people that are not like a black club, can exclude anybody who’s not black because they’re not black. But if a white group tries to do that, oh, my God. The hell hath no fury of liberals and neomarxists because they will come down on you and they will descend on you, and you are the most racist, vile human beings on the planet.

So anyway, this all is the Kalergy plan. This whole thing is all about the Kellergy plan. Anyway, getting back here and it’s not just Italy. Murray tells us about Inger Stoberg, a Danish politician. She was Immigration Minister of Denmark during the crisis of 2015, when Germany’s angular Merkel was waiving in millions of illegals from the Middle East. Ms. Stoiberg got laws passed in Denmark’s Parliament to discourage the illegals from going to her country.

The laws worked in Denmark is still today inhospitable to illegal aliens. The NGOs fought back against her. Nonetheless, in 2021, she was impeached and convicted by the Danish Parliament for having pushed a policy separating children from children, illegals from adults. Sound familiar? Her sentence was 60 days in jail, although she ended up wearing an ankle bracelet instead. So the human rights organizations are a major obstacle to EU government doing anything to counter illegal entry into their country.

It is the same for the UK. British politicians haven’t shown as much steel as Mr. Salvini and Ms. Storberg, but they have made some feeble efforts to defend their shores. A year and a half ago, the then Prime Minister of the UK, Boris Johnson, enacted a program to send illegal aliens well, some illegal aliens to the African country of Rwanda for processing. The human rights NGOs swung into action.

The European Court of Human Rights got involved, and it’s been lawsuit and appeals ever since. A year and a half on from the enactment, zero legal aliens have been sent to Rwanda. Is there some fundamental issue here with human rights? Let’s see human rights are, of course, worth defending. They are an essential element in the ethics of civilized society. I can remember from all the way back in my 1950s childhood hearing ordinary, uneducated English working people protesting that I know my rights.

Likewise, the civil rights in the United States, the indigenites suffered, or the indignities suffered by American blacks as recently as 60 years ago needed correcting. We corrected them class wise and race wise. Britain and America are fairer places now than they were in my grandparents time. That said, it’s getting harder and harder to avoid the conclusion that we overshot the mark on rights. Christopher Caldwell’s terrific 2021 book, The Age of Entitlement shows us that the sting in the tale of our mid 20th century civil rights reforms.

Steve Saylor has related comments the other day when reviewing Richard Haneas’new book The Origins of Woke, rather than announce Mission accomplished and go find another work. The triumphant forces of the civil rights bureaucracy became instead the scourge of ever more esoteric forms of discrimination such as disparate impact, hostile environment due to mean speech, sexual harassment and disability access. They increasingly intervened in the American workplace in favor of complaining members of protected groups which cultivated a culture of complaint.

The business of diversity. Takimag september 20 of 2023. That English bloke of my childhood indignantly telling someone, some authority figure that I know my rights would have been protesting about having wrongly accused of something he didn’t do or being excluded from some public place he could lawfully enter or something of similar magnitude. His equivalent today might be outraged that someone addressed him by the wrong pronoun. Yes, we should be attentive to human rights, including the rights of people in other countries.

That’s a properly humane and Christian approach. And practical matters aside, there are some deep matters of philosophy involved. Paul Gottfried and Michael Anton have been arm wrestling over the nature and origins of rights on the pages of Chronicles magazine recently. If you want some instruction about that from two exceptionally smart people inherited Traditions Are More Credible than Natural Rights by Paul Gottfried, September 15, 2023. Unfortunately, our concept of rights is in time, place and people dependent.

I’m going to pause here. I’m going to check the chat here. Just real quick. Let’s see here. Wow. Well, suspense. Heard of it? Nice warhammer. Hello Katie. Hello Lowly. Hello Gene. Finally able to rest up. Today is a good day. Yes. No white man clubs. I’m white. Had no say in the matter. I just want the winning sperm. Tell me how you really feel, loli. God made me.

I did not pick. Let’s see here. Yes. God does not make junkie, creates perfection. Amen. So they are sending all the illegals here? Yes, they want to replace us with people who used to being ruled, not governed. That is definitely a possibility. They are also looking for people to vote. But I’m hearing that a lot of people are that Mexico is actually get this, this is rich. I’m hearing that Mexico is building a wall to prevent Americans from coming down to Mexico when what is going to happen happens in the near future in the United States.

So I don’t have anything to confirm that. That’s just scuttlebutt that I’m hearing. When did the anti whites agenda start? After the German hope? No, the anti white agenda started. Well, you got to realize the anti white agenda really is more of an American phenomenon because the Marxists realized that in order they could pit the classes against each other in Europe, but in the United States they couldn’t pit classes because there were no classes.

What we have in the United States is we have races. So the anti white thing really it was something that happened in the United States. But the anti white in terms of getting rid of all white people and mixing white people with brown people. That has been something that’s been a Zionist movement for quite some time. At least 100 years. So it was before World War II. It could be both.

Making sure I understand here more time. Correcting. Typos. Anything else? No. You’re not rude warhammer. I don’t think you’re rude. I almost spit out my water when you lily. Well, you make it public and I’m going to read it. Maybe if I find it funny, you know I’m going to read it. I thought it was to keep the illegals from trying to escape. Maybe. All right, so let’s get back in here.

Unfortunately, our concept of rights in time, place and people dependent. People dependent. 50 years ago, no one thought that same sex marriage was a right. Nowadays you can lose your job for saying it isn’t protesting. I know my rights won’t get you your job back. Place dependent. Here was a Shycom. Vice President Han Zheng addressing the United Nations General Assembly yesterday. As countries have different histories, traditions and conditions, we must and can only explore a path of human rights development suited to our national conditions in response to the needs of our people and that’s China threatens.

Taiwan insists human rights are relative in UN address. I find it rich that the Chicoms are lecturing on human rights. People dependent. The late Senator Edward Kennedy, moving the 1965 Immigration Act through Congress, promised us that the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Finally, Senator Kennedy thought that the citizens of an established nation like ours have a right to demographic stability. I agree, but obviously a lot of other people disagree with me and that late senator.

So yes, the whole business of rights has ambiguities and fractuosities. I don’t know what that means. A winding channel, of course. Especially an intricate path or process. Okay, did not never heard of that word before. To be sorted out. I think it would be useful if we could have a clear list of rights agreed by a majority vote on each contentious issue that presents itself to us as a forcefully as the issue of illegal immigration.

Illegal immigration is presenting itself right now. So the dogma of human rights was the first factor second or the second, which may also embrace the third. The white European guilt about colonialism and slavery. If that is indeed a factor, it may soon become an even bigger one. Why? Because the migrant flow may becoming blacker. I find it interesting that they still try to put the white European guilt about slaves and colonialism.

Now, while certainly white Europeans were guilty of colonialism, it was white people that did away with slavery for the most part. I mean the white people were the ones that outlawed the slave trade. The British did. The British outlawed the slave trade and then the Constitution outlawed the importation of slaves. 20 years post the ratification of the constitution. So it was 1809 from 18 nine on that you could not import slaves in the United States.

Whatever slaves were here. The slaves that were people that would be future slaves were reliant upon the reproduction of the slaves that were here. Which then gets into the notion of why would if they could not import slaves, why would they beat them to a bloody pulp into death if they knew that they had to treat them well in order for them to reproduce so that they could continue to maintain slavery? I don’t know.

I have a difficult time reconciling that in my head. The dogma of human rights was the first factor, the second, which may also embrace the third. Okay, I read that if that is indeed a factor, it may very soon become an even bigger one. Why? Because the migrant flood may become blacker. The great Croft’s Mediterranean flood of 2015 was mainly white. It was European and Swarthy, Middle Eastern white, but very little black African or on Wikipedia’s Countries of Origins list of the first black African country was Eritrea at number six.

The top five countries were white or at any rate not black African syria, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Albania and Iraq. The thousands flooding into Lempedusa last week were, by contrast, almost entirely black African. From south of the Sahara Desert, Italy’s, Maloney campaigned on stopping immigration. It’s not working. By Anthony Fiola Washington Post arrivals in Italy have surged to 123,800 so far this year, roughly double last year’s figures and on track to match or exceed the 2016 record.

Interesting, this is not yet true of the Mediterranean boat people in general. Those coming to lampidoso from Tunisia, where a crashing economy has led to pogroms against black Africans, settled there. As I described last week, more and more stories about the Mediterranean boat people seem to have blacks in their accompanying pictures. Though West Africans are being kicked out of Tunisia and may end up on boats to Italy, africans flee their countries to cross the Mediterranean for a better life in Europe.

This has to end now. Europe must stop exploiting Africa so these people stay at home in Africa. Let’s see. All right. This is even true in the Eastern Mediterranean. Greece, for example, has illegals coming in from Somalia, Eritrea and Ethiopia. Greece rice experts condemn racist violence against asylum seekers. Un. org august 2323 Greece UN experts call for safe and impartial border protection policies and accountability for violations involving law enforcement.

After twelve asylum seekers from Somalia air tray and Ethiopia, a six month old were rounded up and taken to Lesbos in April. The English Channel tsunami is still mainly white with Air Traya again at number six and Sudan at number seven. Numbers one through five are Iran, Albania, Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. People crossing the English Channel and small boats. The Migration Observatory, July 20, 123. However, a lot of those crossing the Mediterranean are heading ultimately for the United Kingdom, especially those from Anglophone Black African countries like Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra Lyon, Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania.

If the Mediterranean mix really is getting blacker, the English Channel mix will follow suit after a year or two, thence to guilt, further numbing the ability of politicians to act. There is no stronger ethnic guilt than which European whites feel toward blacks, not even as the generalized ethnic group of post World War II Germans. The main implication is, of course, that if politicians don’t summon up some courage, europe itself will get blacker.

Given the very different numbers for population and fertility in a white Europe and a black Africa, the whole continent of Europe might, by the be the way, Lampuda is right now three quarters black, one quarter white. Even if things don’t go that far, europe might end up with all the black white tensions and rancor that the United States suffers from today. I don’t suppose we shall ever come to the general agreement about the cause of those troubles or the solution for them, but no one can deny the existence of them or that we would be a happier, more harmonious country without them.

It follows that in an alternative universe, whereas the United States had many blacks, this would be a better country to live in. That’s not to imply anything negative about either race. It’s its humane and sympathetic. 1862 address to Freeman at the White House. Abraham Lincoln said, you and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any two other races addressed on colonialization to a deputation of Negroes.

A lot of people probably don’t know that Abraham Lincoln actually advocated for the black people to go colonize someplace else. And many people probably are unaware that Liberia on the west coast of Africa. It was a place where the United States literally sent them. In fact, let me show you something. The capital of Liberia is Monrovia. Why is it Monrovia? Because it was President Monroe who did it.

And Liberia is just basically an absolute cluster of from what it’s like. It’s worse than Haiti, and it’s like cannibalism runs rampant there. It’s really bad. But that was Lincoln’s plan to get rid of the black people, was for them to go colonize something anyway, whatever. I never liked that dude. It’s still true today, 161 years later. Check out the statistics on crime, educational attainment, broken families, et cetera.

We are different races. That was a problem in 1862, and it’s a problem today. I’m going to disagree about the broken families, though. Broken families didn’t really enter into the conversation until the 1960s with the Civil Rights Act. The Civil Rights Act and welfare and the incentivization of fatherless homes by if a woman didn’t have a father in the home, she got more money for the children, so she kicked the men out of the house to get more money from the government.

So that was purely a civil rights issue. Whatever you think about the reason and causes of the trouble, a nation would be wise to avoid that trouble. If it can, the nations of Europe can by not permitting mass settlements of blacks. This country, the United States, started off with a big subpopulation of blacks. We could never persuade any large number of them to leave, although Abraham Lincoln tried.

You must therefore cope with the problems that arise as best we can in a spirit of patriotism and common humanity. Other countries look at us, though, with pity and horror. The great British statesman, Enoch Powell, for example, in his famous 1968 speech against mass Third World immigration. That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic, but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the states itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and own neglect.

The opening words of that speech were just to remind you. The supreme function of statesmanships is to provide against preventable evils. The Brits went ahead with mass immigration of blacks regardless. Today, blacks are 4% of the population of England and Wales, but 13 and a half percent of prison inmates. It’s too late now for the Brits, but for other European countries, the race problem that plagued the UK and the United States today are preventable evils.

Will the Europeans be wise enough to prevent them? Well, we will find out. John Derbyshire writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. This no longer includes National Review, whose editors have some kind of tantrum and fired him. He is the author of We Are Doomed reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by Vdair. com from The Descent Right, also available in Kindle and From The Descent Right to essays of 2013.

Um is that it? Is that it? That didn’t seem like 2500 words. I picked this article because I thought it was long, but that wasn’t that long at all. Shoot, I’ve only been live for 40 minutes. Well, I don’t know. Maybe what I can do is I can use this as an opportunity to go find something on the Kalergy plan and play it. Let me do that. See if I can find something short on the Kalergy plan.

I was expecting that article to be much longer. Um, okay, so this is a see, that’s eight minute long. That’s 55 minutes. Let me see if I can find something that’s a little bit smaller. Shorter. Yeah. Let’s do this one. Kalergy plan of white genocide. If you look at the anti white proposition, there can be no all white countries anywhere. Or there could be no all white areas in the formerly all white countries.

This is the anti white proposition. It doesn’t matter if you go to France, doesn’t matter if you go to Germany. It doesn’t matter if you go to. Know, you’ve got all these countries trying to make themselves non white and this is happening, of course, in every white country, all white countries. No one’s exempt from this stuff. And of course, it just doesn’t happen that way. That doesn’t accidentally occur.

Psychological warfare means war, it means there’s planning. It doesn’t happen by accident. You can’t have something like that without a plan. There has to be an agenda. You’re not going to accidentally try to make China non Chinese. It’s idea of multiculturalism we see espoused today so frequently from every facet of society. It’s not new. People would like to believe that it’s new. And those that don’t seek to support it are old fashioned.

No, this ideology goes back thousands of years. It goes back to our history for a long, long time. And what it leads to is what you see in Babylon. No white people, a society gone. And we will end up the same way if we don’t stop it. It’s as simple as that. History can serve as a lesson for us and this isn’t new. And we’re doing exactly what’s been done before it.

Even if you expose them to authentic information, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior. He will refuse to believe it the psychological shock when they will see in future what the beautiful society of equality and social justice means. No one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community and their country. Um Anaku. It’s Laholisashanim.

The African Israel of him. Shanah Gadir the or. Shamala. Shalama. Shalab. Shalah. So do you feel that you are British? I identify myself as a Muslim. If I was born in in a stable, you know, I’m not going to be a horse. I mean, this is just an island I was born in. Ramesa and Chowdery both live in East London, which is home to one of the largest Muslim populations in the UK.

In one part of town, Ramesa and his associates have set up so called Sharia patrols to go out and discourage behavior that they deem unilamic. But the patrols are not always so friendly. Online clips give a very different picture. A woman in a short skirt is abused. It’s not so Great Britain get the prostitutes off our street. Walking through London with Ramesa, you experience an alternate reality where there is no compromise and all conversations are one sided.

Ultimately, I want to see every single woman in this country recovered from head to toe. I want to see the hand of the thief cut. I want to see adults who are stoned to death. I want to see Sharia law in Europe and I want to see in America as well. I believe our patrols are a means to an end. If we can’t get them out, we plead them out.

A United Nations resolution condemned Rhodesia and urged the world to supply moral and material assistance to Rhodesia’s enemies operating out of Zambia to the north. When these Marxists suffered because they had cut themselves off from food, electricity and jobs that they got from Rhodesia, the United States government sent aid to make up the difference. In 1976, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger actually went to Zambia to promise such aid.

The resulting new government in nation after nation submits to the socialistic one world system that is being built and now South Africa. President Reagan, on September 1985, sent the following official message to the Congress of the United States I hereby report to the Congress that I have exercised my statutory authority to declare that the policies and actions of the government of South Africa constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy and economy of the United States.

And to declare a national emergency to deal with that threat. That’s incredible. That’s absolutely incredible. Well, of course, that led to the Antiapartheid Act of 1986. It called for the unbanning of terrorist organizations such as the African National Congress and the release of what they called political prisoners with the name Nelson Mandela mentioned by named a memorial for all South Africa’s white farmers who’ve been killed since apartheid ended in 1994.

3338 murders in 16 years. That is one white farmer killed every 36 hours. There are powerful forces in South Africa working in league with the one Worlders and internationalists who are subverting independence wherever it exists and helping communists wherever they operate. Stop that because it’s text heavy and it’s not very really I mean, it’s okay, but there were better ones out there for that. Suffice it to say, I’ll let you guys go and try to find some stuff on the Calorici plan.

There’s some really good stuff out there. It’s a little bit longer, but I’m going to keep this short tonight. I’m going to keep it under an hour. I wanted to get something done, but like I said, things just not in my week. For some OD reason it hasn’t gone smooth. Hopefully next week will be a lot better. But it’s very interesting to look at the Kalergy plan. If you guys have not done any research into the Klergy plan, I highly suggest that you do because the Kalergy plan is the plan that essentially what they’re trying to do is they are trying to get rid of all the white people.

And I don’t know if you heard it in the it was very subtle in that video. It was a clip from the movie Braveheart. I don’t know how much how well you guys remember the movie Braveheart. It was like it was in the early 90s. But the King longshanks talked about how he’s like, oh, we’re going to institute primanocta, and is like, for every Scottish couple that gets married, a British lord will have sexual rights to them on the first night.

If we can’t get them out, we’ll breed them out. That was their thinking back? What was it like the 1100? Anyway, the Zionist movement in the United States and Western Europe is absolutely talking about getting rid of basically, they don’t want anybody white except for Ashkenazi. That’s it. And they want everybody who is not Ashkenazi to be subservient to the Ashkenazi. Those are not my words. Those are their words.

Anyway, I’m going to look at the chat here. I’m going to pop the chat out and I’m going to start doing this a little bit more because the people are saying that when I read the chat, it’s like they can’t see what I’m reading. So I’m going to scroll up. Oh, well, thank you, Warhammer. I appreciate that. Lowly, are you lowly, are you in mean? I’m guessing you’re in SoCal EU to look at London, France.

Exactly. Heard about two years ago shutting down our border so people cannot leave. Yeah, I don’t know when I heard it, how far back it was, but I know I’ve heard it recently. I remember likes more worried about marrying white and diluted the it was I think, Katie, there’s a famous clip of Muhammad Ali when he’s like, no, I want to marry no white woman. I want to marry a black woman just like I want to be with somebody of my race.

MLK wanted a colorblind world. How far have we they don’t like it when I say this, but MLK was a communist or he had very hardcore communist leanings. However, I do tend to think, and this is speculation on my part, but I do tend to think that MLK was opening his eyes and seeing things from a non Marxist perspective. And as a result, he was also potentially becoming a liability.

Therefore, he was expendable and they would get a lot more out of him by making him a martyr. So I believe the first slave owner was black. Yes. Um, we are the human race. Yes. I don’t have a problem with interracial relationships. I just have a problem with basically them forcing it on us and making it so that it’s like they want everybody to be interracial. If you look at TV commercials and movies now, it’s like you don’t see same race couples anymore on TV shows.

It’s very rare to see same race couples anywhere. And you always typically see, at least from the woe perspective, you see the woman is almost always dominant over the male. The powers that can be only survive if they can keep the people on this planet divided. Yes, that’s true. That is absolutely true. Thank you. Suspense legals to Switzerland. Yeah. I doubt they’d let them in. Let’s see. Thank you, lowly and Katie, I’m guessing you’re in the eight one eight.

I’m guessing you’re in the eight one eight. Loli, I am out into nine five one in the Inland Empire. Like, I’m going to guess like, Glendale area. Just guessing. Pasadena, Glendale, burbank. All right. Well, I have hit the Western San Fernando Valley. Okay, so like Simi Valley or see, I see on a regular basis cardinal birds that are bird feed two male and female. It’s interesting. Suspense. It’s interesting that you say that because when you look at birds, when you look at animals in the animal kingdom, you don’t really get much cross breeding of animals, animal breeds.

My mom, at one time, she had a lot of chickens. She had like 15 or 20 chickens. And all of the black spec chickens hung together. All of the black chickens hung together, all of the red chickens hung together, all of the gold chickens hung together. It’s interesting. And it’s that way. They’re chickens, but the same colored chicken stuck with the same colored chickens. That was really interesting.

Well, and you know, I I lived in Arizona and I still maintain Arizona residency, but so I still have a I have an Arizona number. Even though I’m in Cali now, for now I’m not here permanently. I’m only here because of my mother. My mother’s 83 end alone, so I can’t leave her. All right, guys, I hit the hour mark. I really thought this was going to be about an hour and a half to 2 hours, but that article was much shorter than I really anticipated.

So I’m just going to go ahead and call it and wish everybody a wonderful night. It is a Saturday, so I’ll let you all go, enjoy your Saturday evening and I’ll be back tomorrow. I’ll do something a lot more substantial tomorrow. Okay? I know where Sierra Vist is. You can’t tell me any place in Southern California where I don’t know where it is. I can tell you. I don’t say this in a braggadocious way, but I literally don’t need a map to get anywhere in Southern California.

I could drive pretty much any place without a map, not a navigation system. I could just go and just get there, but I could pretty much get anywhere in the country like that, too. I love guys. When you see me pull up my map and share my map and it’s got all the little markings stuff on there, it’s because every time I check something out, I mark it that I’ve checked it out.

I don’t know how many markings I have on there, but I love to study maps and I used to when I was a kid, I would ride around the neighborhood on my bike and then I’d draw a map of my town. I don’t know, kind of stuff I did. I’m weird like that. I’m a nerd. I could say I’m a nerd, a geek, but I wear that with a badge of pride.

All right, guys, you all have a wonderful night. Wish everybody sweet dreams tonight. And I will be back tomorrow again. I’m going to try to be here earlier tomorrow, like about probably 334 o’clock, something around in that time frame. So yeah. So everybody have a wonderful evening. And I will see y’all mana. Have a great night, everybody. Appreciate y’all. Shay. .