Civilian Weapon Carry Laws in Israel – Analysis by Tony Shaffer

➡ The surveillance camera focused on smoke plumes in Gaza, indicating potential conflict. While the Israeli government faces criticism for the lack of armed civilians, the usage of carrier battle groups outside Israel serves to deter other entities such as Hezbollah and Iran from supporting Hamas.

Let me just stop you for a second. The upper right hand camera, which we don’t control, zooms in when it sees smoke plumes. So it’s showing a substantial smoke plume there somewhere in Gaza. That’s the upper right hand camera, which on its own or whoever’s controlling it over there, just zoomed in. I’m sorry, Tony. Can please, where you are, what will the Navy do? So the carrier battle groups are therefore larger outside of Israel issues.

I mean, will there be special operations support from those? Absolutely, there’ll be all sorts of support, but the primary use of large muscle movement of power like that is to deter other outside entities, again, such as Hezbollah and Iran from acting to support anything regarding Hamas and their efforts. The initial entry into Israel by Hamas resulted in a lot of needless deaths of innocence. Why weren’t the Israelis armed? Why didn’t they have handguns or rifles to defend themselves? I know they don’t have a Second Amendment in Israel, but they certainly have a natural right to self defense, as all humans do.

Yeah, the Israeli government has made it very difficult. You’ve got to be able to speak Hebrew. I mean, there’s, like a laundry list of things you must go through to be able to be legally armed. It’s insane. And so only 2% of the civilian population at any given time has weapons, and that showed yesterday or Sunday in this attack. And by the way, the Kabutzes, these small towns they’re organized around I’m just going to say it Soviet Union communistic concepts of collectivism.

And I’m not criticizing that if they want to live in peace and have communes, God bless them, but they are all unarmed. They’re clearly vulnerable, and Hamas knew that. So Hamas, are there police, anybody with weapons there? No, there weren’t 25 communities were essentially unarmed bastions of peacenix, and that’s fine. I’m not being critical of people who want to be left alone, but the problem is they were essentially sheep waiting for the slaughter of Hamas to come get them.

I think there was only one of those communities, Judge, which survived, and it was because one guy had a gun, one guy with a gun who was effective in actually helping organize and protect those from the terrorists survive. That’s it. So I’ve argued in multiple interviews I’ve done in us. Media. And I’ve mentioned this on Australian TV too. To me, this is the ultimate test of why we need to have a Second Amendment, the God given right of self defense.

The Israelis, for the most part, made it very difficult for unarmed civilians, any civilian, to be armed because you’re supposed to have military status or be in some special status that’s approved by them. And again, I suggest people go out and Google this. There’s a laundry list of things that you must prove that you are worthy of having a weapon while here in the United States. It is our right to be armed.

And I think this is a determinant factor of why Hamas was so successful so rapidly. And the concert, this peaceful concert where over 200 people were slaughtered again, there is virtually no guards there available to protect them. And that is another reason that was a tragedy. .