Biden Corruption Gets WORSE!
Summary
➡ The speaker discusses an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden over alleged corruption involving his family. Despite media portrayal, it is stated that the inquiry did not flop, but instead presented evidence warranting impeachment. The evidence suggested Joe Biden’s family monetized government resources for their financial benefit. Despite witnesses validating the significance of the evidence, the Democrats did not present a strong defense for Biden. The speaker is critical of Republicans for their perceived lack of aggressivity in subpoenaing Hunter Biden’s bank records earlier.
➡ The text suggests significant evidence of corruption surrounds Joe Biden and his son Hunter, relating to their business dealings, potentially warranting impeachment. This evidence, presented in various documents and emails, includes concealing Biden’s involvement in his son’s international transactions, obtaining income from foreign countries, interference in justice department investigations and potential human trafficking involvements. The text also criticizes media for lack of coverage and calls for immediate action towards impeachment hearings.
➡ Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was reportedly denied Secret Service protection despite numerous threats from known individuals. The Biden administration’s decision to not extend this protection is severely criticized, with critics declaring it as a politically motivated and dangerous move. Judicial Watch has taken action by filing a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) lawsuit aiming to uncover the truth behind this putative negligence of Kennedy’s safety risk.
➡ The Biden family’s dog has repeatedly bitten and attacked Secret Service agents at the White House, with at least 11 incidents recorded, but despite this ongoing issue and the risk posed to agents, there has been no significant action taken to control or re-home the dog. This inaction, seen alongside other alleged misconduct and negligence, adds to a series of scandals surrounding the Biden administration.
Transcript
Plus, we had the first impeachment inquiry hearing. I was there. I’ll give you my insights as to what happened, and we’ll give you some highlights as to what happened. It’s not what the media tells you about. Plus, we have shocking documents from the Secret Service about the failure to provide protection to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. By the Biden administration. And on top of everything else, biden’s dog is still biting Secret Service agents as Judicial Watch exposed.
So the danger to the Secret Service continues. First up, we talked about at some length last week the continuing resolution fight, the issue over the government shutdown. And to bring you up to speed, there’s going to be a government shutdown when you watch this. It’s about to happen, likely, or it will have happened just a day or so ago, depending on when you watch this. And absent extraordinary circumstances that result in the government being kept open, what’s happened is there’s no consensus between the House and the Senate in funding the government.
And what McCarthy had promised to do is get, quote, appropriations measures agency by agency, more or less ten or twelve appropriations measures done by June, sent over to the Senate. And then eventually the way it’s supposed to work is that you would have everything set and all the agencies funded, and the political battle is done by now. Really, it should be done by now. Obviously, it’s the deadline.
The fiscal year begins October 1. But instead, only a few appropriation bills have been passed, three of which or two or three of which were just passed this week. And because it’s passed by the House, and there’s some good things in the House appropriations measures that were passed. For instance, in the Department of Homeland Security appropriations measure, they prohibited the use of federal tax dollars to censor you, which is exactly the sort of thing they need to be doing.
But that’s all well and good because it needs to go over to the Senate, and then the Senate needs to agree to that, and then the president needs to sign it. So we’re way off from that. So the fact that these appropriation measures have been signed doesn’t necessarily get us, the government, to be funded, and so now they have to rely on continuing resolutions to allow that process, in theory, to work.
Now, of course, the left doesn’t want that process to work. They want spending to continue as it is, with no conservative or anti corruption reforms, as Judicial Watch has been calling for. And it will run up against the other deadline, even after continuing resolution, assuming it’s passed ends, and then they’ll be pushed to spend money for another month or, if the left gets its way, for another year, well past the election.
And, of course, the Uni Party, as many have called it. Republican leaders in the Senate who oppose conservative reforms through the budget process and this sort of fight around the continuing resolution are happy to see that go on as well, because 25 or so Republicans in the Senate voted. For a continuing resolution just so you know, for a continuing resolution that would fund everything you hate about the Biden administration in terms of its corruption, the border invasion, the continued harassing, unprecedented election interferencing prosecutions of Donald Trump, the censorship, you name it.
Fully funded by Republicans in the Senate. At least 25 senators, 19. Only 19 Republicans voted against it. And so now McCarthy needs to either get a continuing resolution through, or otherwise there’s a shutdown. And it’s unlikely to happen over the next few hours. And as I said, when you’re watching this, it’s likely it’s happened or will have happened shortly before this, but it’s important you continue to maintain vigilance on this issue.
And the question I have for you is, do you think that they should allow and I mean meaning the House of Representatives, that is nominally run by individuals who agree with us on these corruption issues, or so they say, should we allow the continuing resolution or, frankly, any appropriations measures that flow after that to fund biden corruption? There is a story the other day that the Biden administration dropped over the last two weeks nearly 8000 illegal aliens in the middle of San Diego.
8000 in the last two weeks. The Biden administration is continuing to try to censor Americans. Obviously, they’re targeting Trump. We talked last week. They want to gag him and stop him from speaking through this prosecution. Literally. They don’t want him to be able to mention Donald Trump’s excuse me, President Biden’s name. It looks like, in the context of this case, and then on top of everything else, you have the Biden administration illegally using tax dollars to push abortion through the Defense Department.
We’re supposed to be defending our nation, and they want to misuse those tax dollars to kill the unborn Children of Service members. And don’t even get me started on the Ukraine issue, because I know people have different views on no no changes. In fact, this is going to be the fight, right? And if you have concerns about the continued funding of Biden corruption and abuse, you need to keep on calling your members of Congress and share your concerns.
2022-5312-1202-2531-21. I know it may be the weekend. When you see this, try calling the weekend. I don’t know who’s going to be working over the weekend. I suspect some of them will be there. Keep the phones ringing it has an impact. And I don’t know what’s going to happen if the government shuts down. Maybe Speaker McCarthy is no longer speaker because he will have lost confidence, lost the confidence of his colleagues in running the show over there.
But in the least, I don’t believe personally that your federal tax dollars should go to fund. For instance, Jack Smith and I jokingly issued a compromise the other day or offered a compromise the other day. Well, yeah, let’s defund Jack Smith and send the money over to Ukraine if that’s what they want, to be funded so aggressively. But I tell you, given the Biden border invasion, the Biden prosecutions of his political enemies both through the federal system and frankly, through the state system, his political allies in New York and mean they should be cutting all that money out of that, all the money out of those budgets, jack Smith should be defunded.
And I would curtail funding for Fulton County and Alvin Bragg’s operation in Manhattan. And, frankly, the New York Attorney General who’s trying to destroy, quite literally destroy President Trump’s business operations through this meritless lawsuit with an anti Trump judge. You may have seen some news in that regard, too, all supported with tax dollars, either directly in the case of the federal government or indirectly in the case of the state attacks on Trump.
The selection interference. So the battle is not over. Keep on fighting. Keep up with the heavy lifting. 202-25-3121. And I was talking about this in the context of impeachment earlier this week, and I think I summed it up pretty well. Let’s go to the video of that. Hey, everyone. It has begun, the Biden impeachment inquiries, first hearing this week. But as we see with this budget fight, this continuing resolution fight, impeachment is necessary for Biden corruption, but not sufficient, because right now, the Republicans in the House and generally Congress has been fully funding all of this abuse.
That we’re concerned about whether it be the COVID up by the Justice Department of Biden corruption or the abuse by the Biden Justice Department of President Trump and other innocents. So I encourage you to call your members of Congress 202-25-3121, tell them to keep up the pressure on Biden corruption, but also defund the abuses of power. 202-25-3121 the fight’s now, and your action is needed. I think I should have just played that rather than make you suffer through the ten minutes of discussion about it.
But that’s a pretty good summary. But that’s where we stand now. And as I noted in the video, after months and months of Judicial Watch conservatives and I know you demanding impeachment of Joe Biden, they finally did it. Now, McCarthy was on vacation. The House was on vacation for seven weeks. He came back at the end of the August 7 week recess that went into September, an August recess that lasts into September.
Don’t you love it? And he announced impeachment now we can all guess and speculate as to why he changed his mind and all of a sudden started supporting an impeachment inquiry. But it was the right thing to do. It was what we suggested that Republicans do for some time. And I don’t think they had a choice, given all the evidence of Biden corruption. And we’ve been calling on it for some time.
I made a speech to CPAC highlighting it earlier this year. I think it’s well worth looking back at it. And by the way, an impeachment or two would be nice. If the Schiff Pelosi gang can impeach Trump in order to cover up Biden corruption, why not actually impeach Biden for his actual corruption? The FBI and DOJ obviously are irredeemably corrupt in the least. No more blank checks for the political enforcement arms of the left and the Democratic Party because the left using federal law enforcement to destroy their political opposition.
It could be the end of our republic. Boy, I was right back then, right? They should have impeached him and shut the funding down for the Justice Department months ago, but they didn’t. But we now have this impeachment proceeding, the first hearing of which began this week or took place this week, the impeachment inquiry. I went into it. I was there for virtually the entire hearing. It was like five.
That’s at least 6 hours. I think I left sometime during hour five. The media, of course, would have you believe it was a big flop. It wasn’t a big flop. It showed through the hearing. Those who, if you watched it, they showed, were presented devastating evidence of Biden corruption, warranting impeachment. And of course, the left and the Biden media is going to mock the operation, but there’s no way you could watch that hearing and not come away with the conclusion that Joe Biden and his family were involved in pretty serious racketeering operations.
And this is my analysis of the hearing, at least on Twitter. I’ll read it here. It’s pretty short. I don’t think we need to show the clip of it. I attended the first impeachment inquiry hearing in person for Judicial Watch and its millions of supporters, meaning you, dear listener and viewer. The public was presented with significant and persuasive evidence based mostly on bank documents and contemporaneous emails, texts of Joe Biden’s helping run an international racketeering operation using government resources that raked in tens of millions of dollars for his and his family’s benefit.
Democrats responded with irrelevant talking points on the shutdown, exclamation point and Trump exclamation point and fake complaints about evidence exclamation point. In fact, Democrats even attacked a witness for sharing a social media post criticizing the Biden border invasion. There was no real defenses offered in the face of the shocking evidence of Joe Biden’s corruption by the Democrats. Again, there has never been so much evidence about so much corruption against the President in American history.
So I thought it was an important hearing. It was useful. So the witnesses they had, all of which were expert witnesses, they had Jonathan Turley, Eileen O’Connor, I forget the other two. A gentleman who was a forensic accountant for the Republicans and a constitutional scholar for the Democrats. And so they were providing information about whether they thought the evidence to date warranted, quote, an impeachment inquiry, which is essentially not a vote up or down on impeachment, but figuring out whether there’s enough information out there and what other evidence is needed to justify impeachment.
Now, I think they’re already there. Jonathan Turley disagrees, but he certainly thinks there’s more than enough evidence. And as I noted, the media would have you believe, oh, it’s all old hat. Nothing new. There was new information in there because the House Ways and Means Committee released new information obtained from the whistleblowers and from the IRS about Hunter Biden and Joe and his family’s. As I said, racketeering operation.
So I think we have a nice summary video of some of the highlights of it, and I’ll watch it with you. And if I feel the need to yell or scream or comment, I’ll intervene. But let’s begin the summary reel of the impeachment inquiry earlier this week. But I also do believe it’s Jonathan Turle, that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry into the conduct of President Biden.
This was going on for years with various different companies. Pretty good summary. During the course of Joe Biden’s vice presidency, after his vice presidency, and at least during his candidacy for President in 2015, hunter Biden and James Bardard started working with CEFC, which is a Chinese company, energy company with direct ties to the Chinese Communist Party. This is the WhatsApp? Text message between Jim Biden and Hunter Biden.
In this text message, it clearly says, anyway, we can talk later, but you’ve been drawn into something purely for the purpose of protecting dad. Miss O’Connor, do you think that this text message would lead this committee to get further information about the business dealings of Hunter Biden and how that actually links to Jim Biden, the President’s brother, and why they are so concerned with protecting dad, aka Joe Biden, aka the President of the United States? Yes.
This is a text message between Hunter Biden and Naomi Biden. This is a famous one that says, I hope you all do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years. It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike Pop, I won’t make you give me half your salary. This is about four months before Joe Biden launched his campaign for President of the United States, december 2018.
The highlight is this is a text message between Jim Biden and Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden was in a bad way, by the way. He was really strung out. He lost a bunch of money. He needed help. Jim Biden says, this can work. You need a safe harbor. I can work with your father alone. It’ll probably take several months and everybody can read the text. Ivan is not his real name.
But Ivan describes Vidam Pazarski directly, admitting to him in a confidential conversation that they hired a not so smart Hunter Biden to protect us, quote, through his dad from all kinds of problems. Then Ivan speaks directly to CEO Zolchewski, and Zolcewski confides that Hunter Biden will take care of those corruption issues through his dad. Zolchevsky is being investigated by Victor Shokin, a Ukrainian prosecutor. Joe Biden suddenly begins to call for Shokin’s removal.
Now, Ivan is also told by the document they want to cost him $5 million to pay one Biden and 5 million IRS to pay the other. This is direct evidence of naked corruption and bribery. Zolcevsky also admitted to Ivan that both Bidens pushed him to pay them and to keep Hunter Biden on the board. Hunter Biden used his father, the Vice President of the United States, to threaten his victim, who he had just trafficked for sex.
And the Department of justice refuses to speak to me. Hunter Biden needs to be held accountable for his sexual exploitation of women. And we’ve shown more evidence. We’ve shown evidence. This is what it looks like. The witnesses today have all identified the evidence the committee has uncovered as deserving further inquiry. And that is what this committee will do no matter where that evidence leads. I want to thank the witnesses for their testimony today.
It confirms the evidence compiled by this committee justifies the investigation of Joe Biden’s role in his family’s international business schemes and justifies the next step of this investigation. One of those steps is gaining insight into where the Biden’s foreign money ended up for what purposes. Therefore, today, I will subpoena the bank records of Hunter Biden, james Biden and their affiliated companies. Well, you can see there was a lot of substance there.
Now, we didn’t play the Democrats’responses. Democrat responses were virtually all irrelevant. They started off demanding to question Rudy Giuliani and another figure who was working with Rudy at the time, Lev Parnas. So there know procedural stunts in that regard, trying to get subpoenas for Rudy Giuliani on issues that they’re being raised there. It’s obviously off the wall. And of course, they were talking about the Democrats were talking about Joe Biden.
Not Joe Biden, but Donald Trump. So screaming about Trump and also screaming about the looming government shutdown, they suggested that they can’t be having a hearing if there’s going to be a government shutdown, which is also absurd. No one, as best I could tell, seemed to defend Joe Biden’s conduct. The best they could do was say, well, just because Hunter Biden is terrible doesn’t mean that Joe is.
Despite all the evidence that Joe and Hunter were two peas in a pod here in the basic understanding of law and ethics, that you can bribe one person by taking care of a family member, right? Who are they kidding here? And so it was announced at the end of the hearing that by James Comer who closed the hearing there that you saw that he finally and this is where I’m critical of the Republicans here, I almost fell off the chair should be that they finally are going to subpoena Hunter’s bank records directly.
Why haven’t they done that to date? I don’t understand. I would have questioned Hunter or brought him in long ago and certainly other members of the Biden family. So for all the complaints we have about the Justice Department going slow and protecting know, some of our friends in the House weren’t as aggressive as they should have been in my view. But there were new documents put out there and the media and the left and Joe Biden and the White House want you to believe there’s no, quote, evidence and there’s significant evidence warranting not only a serious criminal investigation of Joe Biden, but more than enough.
And as I’ve noted previously, the evidence of corruption by Joe Biden is enormous. And there’s been nothing like it in terms of scope and seriousness against any president in American history. So it’s the strongest case for impeachment that we’ve ever had in American history. I can’t think of anything. So that’s where we stand and that’s the reality of it. And I wanted to go over some of the new information that’s come out here because the media is not going to tell you about it and I am.
And you know, if Congress is doing some of the heavy lifting finally through these whistleblowers and other investigations, well, I’d be remiss as the head of a watchdog group in not highlighting it. The Ways and Means Committee released new documents. I think they had hundreds of documents. I looked through them and here are some of the highlights. The documents release and I’m going to read from their release.
They reveal Joe Biden’s connections to his son Hunter Biden’s business dealings. The materials confirmed that Hunter Biden was traveling the world to sell influence and access to the Biden brand, meaning to his father, Joe Biden. And Hunter even referred access to his father referred to access to his father as the keys to my family’s only asset. In fact, according to the documents here it is. There’s a message from Hunter.
You see it there. Explain to me one thing Tony brings to my table that I so desperately need that I’m willing to sign over my family’s brand and pretty much the rest of my business life. Read the Bleeping documents, people. It’s plain bleeping English. Why in blank name would I give this marginal bully the keys to my family’s only asset? Why? Who’s the family’s only asset? Of course it’s President Biden.
The scheme generated millions of dollars from foreign countries for members of the Biden family, channeled through a vast array of corporate entities and shell companies. The evidence also documents a campaign by the Justice Department to protect the Biden family from investigation. Even as Hunter Biden attempted to evade paying taxes on income that came from foreign countries, including China, Ukraine, and others. The Biden protection effort was strongest whenever investigative steps might have led to or implicated actions taken by Joe Biden during the investigation into his son, justice Department officials instructed investigators seeking a search warrant to erase any mention.
Let’s bring up that clip there of political figure one whose documents obviously showed to be basically they’re talking about Joe Biden here as a priority. Someone needs to redraft attachment. B, please focus on thorough evidence only. There should be nothing about political figure one in here. So they didn’t want Joe in there. Now, Wolf, Leslie Wolf, she’s implicated in a lot of this obstruction. Now, the left likes to make a big show of saying, well, this happened during the Trump administration, as if we’re supposed to be persuaded that the Justice Department, that was viciously anti Trump, was desperate to jail Trump while protecting Joe Biden and Obama and Hillary through the entire four years of President Trump, that we’re supposed to presume that because they were Trump Justice Department officials, that they were willing to apply the law fairly, and that’s not the case.
We don’t have no evidence that was ever the case during the Trump administration with the deep state Justice Department, and we see evidence of it here. Documents also show Hunter Biden and his business associates had access to the White House and Joe Biden’s advisors. Biden’s business associates were instructed to, quote, not mention Joe being involved on official trips and official trips to Ukraine. Line up u. S. Government actions in hunter biden to the Hunter biden.
I can’t read from there’s a label here I can’t read through. I guess they’re referencing Biden’s family bottom line. And CNN even had this information. I don’t know. CNN reported it. Let’s go to the CNN. So here’s an email. Producer has an email from Hunter saying he expected all of his stuff to go away when his dad became president. Well, he almost was, right? Right. Because they had that sweetheart plea deal that would have given him a slap on the wrist for serious IRS tax charges, no investigation into the conspiracy racketeering and Foreign Agent Registration Act violations and sliding that gun charge through with no criminal liability at all.
It so I think that’s I think that’s all I want to go through. You know, that’s new evidence, right? So we have evidence now that Joe Biden was getting half his income, according to his son, from his son that the big guy Joe Biden was benefiting from these Chinese deals. That Joe Biden was personally involved in the business activities of his son by calling his associates and calling his son when business meetings were taking place and participating directly in the meetings with him in person.
At one point. That’s pretty powerful evidence, isn’t it? And so when the media tells you there’s no evidence, when the Left tells you there are no evidence, I don’t know, are they lying to you or are they ignorant? You can pick. I think it’s lying. I don’t think it’s ignorant. And if it’s ignorant, it’s willful ignorance. So either way, there’s a moral responsibility to be forthright, but we’re not getting it.
And of course, Judicial Watch is continuing its own separate investigations into these Biden issues. So how did impeachment hearing how did the impeachment hearing go? I gave it a B plus. I think the Republicans should have been a bit more forceful both through their witnesses and in being forthright as to concluding what the evidence shows. Like what I try to do right in the hearing room itself, the Democrats were acting like clowns.
High school students running around laughing, joking, pretending that the evidence didn’t show what it showed. When Marjorie Taylor Greene, for instance, provided that shocking information about Hunter’s involvement in human trafficking with young women, what was the Democrat response? Oh, it’s pornography, we can’t show it. And of course, it wasn’t pornography, quite literally, but that was their response, not outrage about the evidence of human trafficking involving Joe Biden’s son and Joe Biden’s potential involvement in that.
Because the issue is, did Joe help pay for some of his son’s misconduct in that regard? The money flowed both ways at one point, it looked like. So it’s pretty serious stuff. I don’t know how quickly the Republicans are prepared to move on this, but they need to get moving, right? As I said in the video earlier, impeachment is necessary, but not sufficient. And by necessary, I mean we need it done now, not in six months, not in ten months.
But we need to get to a conclusion and move forward with impeachment as soon as practical. And that means bringing in witnesses immediately. That means subpoenaing immediately and then seeking court relief if they don’t get the records immediately in an emergency fashion. So I’m fearful that some of this impeachment push by the Republicans is a little bit half hearted. It’s a little too narrow. I’m not seeing any evidence, for instance, they want to impeach him, president Biden, over his failure to uphold his oath of office and frankly, to attack the American people through this border invasion, or, for instance, the censorship issue.
He wants to censor people. Isn’t that corruption? And he’s proud about it and he’s trying to jail Biden. I mean, jail Trump. Isn’t that corruption? So if I were doing an impeachment inquiry, I’d look at all those issues, but we’ll see. So it wasn’t a bad start. The media is going to make fun of them and mock them no matter what they do. So they should be as aggressive as possible because they’re going to get mocked no matter what.
So that was my initial take, and as I said earlier. In the meantime, judicial watches, dozen or so lawsuits, and probably dozens of FOIA requests will continue into the Biden family corruption scandal. For instance, we uncovered how Joe I mean, Hunter traveled to 29 countries when Joe was vice president, at least 29 countries. And the documents released this week by the House Waynes and Means Committee and talked about at the hearing this week, joe excuse me, Hunter and the Hunter family operation, including Joe, it looks like, was getting money from 23 different countries.
23. A lot of work to be done. And they’re already a little bit late and behind the ball because they haven’t gotten the key records from the Hunter directly. And frankly, Joe, you got to get Joe’s records as well, just beyond his tax return records, but there’s other records to be gotten. So there you have it. Next up, you may have seen that Robert F. Kennedy is running for president as of now in the Democratic Party.
There’s news today that he may run as an independent. I don’t know whether that’s going to happen or not, but he has sought Secret Service protection, and he’d been denied it by Joe Biden as Secret Service. Just completely outrageous. I’m not going to get right to the heart of it, right. His very name seems to me to warrant Secret Service protection. Now, typically the internal rules of the Secret Services, unless they have a good reason not to, they don’t provide Secret Service protection outside of a year from the presidential race campaign unless there’s a reason and isn’t there a reason? And Judicial Watch asked for records, and we uncovered there was good reason, and they still denied him Secret Service protection.
I have a video introducing the issue here now. Hey, everyone, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton here. We have some breaking news. We just got records from the Secret Service under FOIA that show that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Was denied Secret Service protection despite numerous threats from known actors already on the Secret Service radar. Tell you, the Biden administration’s refusal to extend him Secret Service protection is vicious and vindictive.
And we’re going to continue our investigation. In fact, we just filed a FOIA lawsuit to get the full truth about this dangerous decision by Biden that is putting RFK Jr’s life needlessly at risk. Well, I didn’t hear audio on my end of that, so I’m hoping you heard it. But the long and short of it, as I say, there were known people, known subjects in the Secret Service or known subjects to the Secret Service who were sending threatening materials to sending threats to Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. And they still denied him Secret Service protection. And what had happened was we had, I think, one or two requests for records. We sued on one. The next day, magically, right? Coincidentally, we received records to another request that was a little less focused than the one we had. Sued over. And these records show what I said they show, and as I said in the release, or I should say what they say in the records.
So this is the FOIA. We ask for records and communications of the director, the Deputy Director, the Chief operating Officer and the Assistant Director of the Office of Protective Operations of the Secret Service. And back in July, it was disclosed by Kennedy on his Twitter account, or, which is now known as X, that he had been denied Secret Service protection. He said, since the assassination of my father in 1968, candidates for President are provided Secret Service protection, but not me.
And then just last week, Kennedy again requested the Secret Service protect him following an incident on the campaign trail involving an armed man who was presenting himself as a police officer or law enforcement. Thankfully, the private protection he had caught him. I don’t know if anything would happen, but that’s the sort of risk he faced. Right? And the Secret Service’s response is going to be, well, we can’t give Secret Service protection.
Everyone running for president. I don’t know if that’s true. It’s just a budget issue. But if there’s an exception to be made, if there’s not an exception made for Robert F. Kennedy, given his name and what happened to his father and to his Uncle JFK, I don’t know what they’re there for. And I just think this is, as I said, a vicious decision by the Biden people and it puts him at risk.
The records obtained by Judicial Watch include a Secret Service protection, intelligence and assessment that reveals numerous threats to Kennedy. And the assessment is called, the document says, us Secret Service Protective Intelligence and Assessment Division, Risk Management Branch 2024. Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. And they have something called risk environment. And in that document, on April 23, 2023, and they go through the list of threats, a known subject submitted an inappropriate comment on the White House website addressed to President Biden, stated, basically, robert Kennedy announces their candidacy to Seceive.
Joseph Biden for President of the United States. There’s no way you blank assassinate President Donald Trump. Go get him, kiddo. I don’t know what that means. So maybe that wasn’t seen as much of a threat. But these are known subjects, which means my understanding means is that they worry the Secret Service when they make comments like this. A known subject mailed a there’s, by the way, there’s a redacted part, so we don’t know what it says.
Someone mailed a nonsensical letter to the hotel warned that a madman may commit a serious terrorist act and wanted to discuss his sins with Kennedy. So this is just another dangerous character. A known subject sent numerous packages, including gifts and a wedding band to Kennedy, stated that she loves Kennedy and expressed anger about being kept away from him. Another dangerous character. One letter contained a 32 page manifesto in which kennedy in which the known subject made nonsensical religious references and described himself as a commissioned messenger of God.
Not reassuring if you’re on the wrong end of that. Another known subject regularly sends threatening emails. So multiple emails stating he will, quote, bury Kennedy, everyone will die and he will make Kennedy suffer. So there you have it. The assessment also notes many comments suggested that for no other reason than that he is a Kennedy, he would be at risk of assassination in May 2023. Kenny received increased meaning attention after accusing the CIA of involvement in the assassination of his uncle.
Kennedy had advocated for the release of the individual currently in prison for assassinating his father, Siron Siron, because he believes a CIA contractor was responsible for his death. Kennedy has received both support and criticism for his stance on vaccines and has been described as an anti vaccine activist. So a lot of weird stuff in this document. This is a weird document. And what I found weird about it is that it had kind of this anti Kennedy slant to it and it detailed things that Kennedy had done that were controversial.
I’m not quite sure why they need to put it in there other than maybe to justify the fact that the documents suggest that he’s weird politically and maybe doesn’t deserve the protection through his, quote, is that anti vaccine stances. They talk about a book where he had extramarital affairs. There’s a journal or something like that, how he had been a drug and alcohol addict in the past, how he was attacking Dr.
Fauci and Bill Gates. So it looked like all this materials kind of dumped in here to help justify what is the ultimate conclusion, which, according to the record show, was because I guess Congress wanted some answers. And this is a Deputy Special Agent in charge responds to some of these inquiries by saying the following language was key to the recommendation and subsequent decision protection under these guidelines should only be granted within one year prior to the general election.
Protection more than one year prior to the general election should only be granted in extraordinary case by case circumstances in consultation with the committee based on threat assessment and other factors. And there’s an internal committee that considers this. So this was a political decision in my view, given all the redactions and the failure to respond to other records to deny Kennedy this Secret Service protection. And I would hope whether you’re a Democrat, a Republican, a conservative, a liberal, you would find extremely objectionable.
The Biden Secret Service’s decision not to provide Kennedy protection as he’s running for President now, he’s polling a substantial number in the presidential primary. So it’s not like he’s an unserious mean there’s. It’s not like he’s someone that no one’s heard of before. His name obviously generates controversy in and of itself. It’s just shocking to me that there’s no Secret Service protection for him and I’m proud that Judicial Watch was able to expose that there was no good faith basis to deny him protection.
And they have these documents. You can look at them yourself about why they presume to deny him the protection. And to me, it just looks like all politics. And I hope Congress lets its ire be known and this man gets protected because I think his life is being put needlessly at risk. The Biden administration’s refusal to provide Secret Service protection to Mr. Kennedy is dangerous and vindictive. These FOIA requests and our new lawsuit we just filed a FOIA lawsuit aimed to get to the full truth on why Mr.
Kennedy’s life is being put at unnecessary risk by the Biden administration. So there, I say it. This is part and parcel of the Biden regime’s approach to their political opposition. Jail them. If you’re a Supreme Court Justice and someone shows up outside your house in violation of the law to try and intimidate you, don’t arrest them. In fact, encourage it. Don’t enforce federal law placing the Supreme Court justices you don’t like their lives and their family’s lives at risk.
And if you dare run against Biden, as I said, you’ll get jailed. Ask Donald Trump about that. Or even if we know that your life is at risk because of your name and prominence, you won’t get the necessary protection that’s within the complete discretion of the administration to provide through the Secret Service. What an ugly, ugly corruption scandal this is. I mean, to hear the president talk about the threats to democracy, he’s jailing his political opponents on unprecedented protectual grounds, and he’s letting RFK Jr.
Hang out there with no Secret Service protection, despite the significant threats to his life he faces. Dark days. Dark days. I never thought we’d see it. And I’m glad Judicial Watch is pursuing this. We’ve got a lawsuit, as I said, that seeks for documents for leadership, not only the Secret Service, but the Department of Homeland Security, because we want to get to the truth of this circus. As I said previously here, the Biden regime treats the Secret Service like dirt.
And Judicial Watch had uncovered back in July, following up on the prior dog attacks, that Joe Biden’s new dog had attacked Secret Service agents ten times, terrorizing the compound. Serious bites, too. And no one cared. They didn’t do anything about it. Joe and Jill let their dog repeatedly bite and attack Secret Service and White House staff with no consequence. The dog’s still there. We called them out on it because we found the documents.
We got a tip. We knew it was happening again because we had exposed their lies about the prior dogs attacking Secret Service agents. And then we found out from a tipster, I guess, that the new dog was biting agents again or was involved in incidents. It was astonishing. I can see lots of FOIA documents, but when I see documents about this dog, putting secret service agents at risk, serious risk for harm through this biting.
It’s just outrageous. And again, the media likes to pretend this isn’t a big issue. And sure enough, the documents showed that the dog bit ten secret service agents, and the White house responded with some dishonest, obviously dishonest excuses for what had happened and saying they’re working with the dog. Well, there’s no working with a dog that has bitten ten people or sought to attack ten people. And of course, they really weren’t working with the dog.
I mean, when did they begin working with the dog? These dog bites had occurred in the first part of the year. We uncovered the documents in July. So they hadn’t done anything until judicial watch made noise about it. And then we find out this week, put up the headline the dog bit someone else. The 11th known incident. It happened, I guess, earlier this weekend. Our secret service agents who are protecting the president of the United States, his family, and Hunter, when he shows up, right, are putting their lives on the line, and they have to worry about a dog biting them, biting them in the back like one agent was bitten.
Well, what if an agent decides he needs to shoot the dog? What a nightmare. What is Biden thinking? What is Jill thinking? Get rid of the dog. The dog needs to be rehomed removed from the Biden family. As long as they have the secret service protection, whether it be at the White House or at home. One of the bites took place at his home in Delaware. The dog can’t handle you know, the Biden people said again, oh, we’re working with the dog.
Well, they’re not working with the dog. He’s still biting people. Just a week ago now. Is it the worst of the Biden scandals? No, but it’s a nasty scandal, people getting injured. I don’t know of any other scandal where people have been injured. This is a corruption scandal. Federal law enforcement agents have been injured without consequence by Joe Biden’s dog. Imagine if Trump’s dog was doing this or someone else.
You’d know what the media’s interest would be. And I just see this as kind of with all due respect to president Biden as a mark of arrogance. It so reflects his attitude. Doesn’t of I’ve compared this I don’t know if I’ve said this to you via the think. I think of these mafia figures walking down the street, and his dog is going around and the mafia don’s dog is going around biting everybody, and everyone’s afraid to say something.
Is that what’s going on with the secret service? Where’s the secret service leadership protecting their agents? AWOL, so our investigation continues. They’re still hiding documents from us. We’ll probably have to sue again. But I can tell you, based on this report, there are more agents who have been bitten. I’m sure of it. And they’re hiding it from you, the American people. So in addition to all the other Joe Biden scandals, there’s a Biden scandal happening right now in the White House, where his dog is going around biting law enforcement personnel, and no one’s doing anything about it other than Judicial Watch.
So I don’t want the dog to be put down. Maybe they can find a home where he’ll be. It should be nowhere near the White House, nowhere near a place where he has to deal with Secret Service or the numbers of people that support a president when he’s either in the White House or in his home in Delaware, where he spends, as you know, a good deal of time.
So what an, huh? China money, RFK. Jr impeachment, government shutdown and Joe Biden’s dog mauling secret Service agents. What a strange city this is. Well, pray for America, and we pray for America, too. But we also work as if it depends all on us, because I think we have an obligation as patriots to do it. And if you like the work we’re talking about here at Judicial Watch and what we’re doing, I encourage you to support it@judicialwatch.
org. You can go and make a donation. And even if you can’t make a donation, you can support our work by liking this video, sharing it, commenting it, getting the word out, and educating your fellow Americans about what you’re learning here. And we will be here here next time with the next Judicial Watch weekly update. Thanks for watching. Don’t forget to hit that subscribe button. And like our video down below.
.
