Recent Key Decisions of Supreme Court | Greg Reese

Categories
Posted in: Greg Reese, News, Patriots
SPREAD THE WORD

BA WORRIED ABOUT 5G FB BANNER 728X90

Summary

➡ Greg Reese talks about how the Supreme Court made several key rulings: they decided that presidents can’t be prosecuted for their official acts; they upheld laws against camping on public property, even for the homeless; they ruled that a charge used against Capitol building trespassers on January 6th doesn’t apply, potentially freeing many prisoners; and they overturned a 40-year-old case, Chevron, which gave federal agencies a lot of power. This last case involved a fishing company, Loperbright Enterprises, that was being unfairly charged by the National Marine Fishery Service, a federal agency. The Chevron case had allowed federal agencies to interpret laws as they saw fit, leading to some questionable decisions. Now, this power has been taken away, which could lead to a rollback of federal agencies’ rules in the future.

Transcript

In Trump vs. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the president and former presidents may not be prosecuted for exercising core constitutional powers and are entitled to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all official acts. The justices ordered the lower courts to apply this decision to the Donald Trump case being led by Jack Smith. In City of Grants Pass vs. Johnson, the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court has ruled that the law which disallows people from sleeping on public streets can be enforced against the homeless population.

In Fisher vs. United States, the Supreme Court has ruled that the key charge used to prosecute and sentence hundreds of Americans for walking through the U.S. Capitol building on January 6th, obstruction of an official proceeding does not apply, which likely means freedom for many American political prisoners. In Loperbright Enterprises vs. Raimondo, the Supreme Court overturned a 40-year-old case called Chevron that granted radical levels of power to federal agencies. Spike Cohen, at real Spike Cohen, explains this case and its importance. A family fishing company, Loperbright Enterprises, was being driven out of business because they couldn’t afford the $700 per day they were being charged by the NMFS, the National Marine Fishery Service, to monitor their company.

The thing is, federal law doesn’t authorize the NMFS to charge businesses for this. They just decided to start doing it in 2013. Why did they think they could get away with just charging people without any legal authorization? Because in 1984, in the Chevron decision, the Supreme Court decided that regulatory agencies were the experts in their field. And the courts should just defer to their interpretation of the law. So for the past 40 years, federal agencies have been able to interpret laws to mean whatever they want, and the courts had to just go with it. It was called Chevron Deferance, and it put bureaucrats in charge of the country.

It’s how OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, was able to decide that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab or be fired. No law gave them that authority. They just made it up. It’s how the ATF, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, was able to decide a piece of plastic was a machine gun. It’s how the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service, the NRCS, is able to decide that a small puddle is a protected wetland. It’s how out of control agencies have been able to create rules out of thin air and force you to comply, and the courts had to simply defer to them because they were the experts.

Imagine if your local police could just arrest you for any reason, and no judge or jury was allowed to determine if you’d actually committed a crime or not, just off to jail you go. That’s what Chevron Deferance was. It was not only blatantly unconstitutional, it caused immeasurable harm to everyone. Thankfully, it’s now gone. We haven’t even begun to feel the effects of this decision in the courts. It will be used for years to come to roll back federal agencies, and we’ll all be better off for it. And that’s why politicians and corporate media are freaking out about it.

Spike Cohen, in an era of bad news, the U.S. Supreme Court has brought us some good tools that we the people can wield to work on restoring America. Happy Independence Day. Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Reese. [tr:trw].

See more of Greg Reese on their Public Channel and the MPN Greg Reese channel.

Author

  • Greg Reese

    Greg Reese, a devoted member of the Truth Mafia, can be found sharing his insights on the dynamic platform bannd.video alongside Alex Jones. This distinctive soldier is always ready to provoke engaging conversations that are one-of-a-kind.

    View all posts

Sign Up Below To Get Daily Patriot Updates & Connect With Patriots From Around The Globe

Let Us Unite As A  Patriots Network!

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you agree to receive emails from My Patriots Network about our updates, community, and sponsors. You can unsubscribe anytime. Read our Privacy Policy.

BA WORRIED ABOUT 5G FB BANNER 728X90

SPREAD THE WORD

Tags

federal agencies interpreting laws future of federal agency power impact on Loperbright Enterprises laws against camping on public property National Marine Fishery Service charges overturning of Chevron case presidents can't be prosecuted for official acts rollback of federal agencies' rules Supreme Court key rulings Supreme Court ruling on Capitol building trespassers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *