➡ Judicial Watch, a legal watchdog group, has successfully removed over 6 million inactive names from voter rolls across the U.S. This was achieved through lawsuits and settlements with various states, ensuring that voter lists are updated and accurate. Despite this progress, there are still an estimated 23-24 million names that need to be removed. Judicial Watch’s efforts aim to prevent potential voting fraud and uphold the integrity of the voting process.
➡ The text discusses the importance of election security and the role of Judicial Watch in ensuring it. It highlights the need for voter ID and citizenship verification during voting registration. The text also mentions the SAVE act, a proposed law that would make these requirements mandatory for federal elections. Judicial Watch is committed to legal action to clean up voter rolls and ensure election integrity, and the text encourages public support for their work.
➡ The Secret Service failed to protect President Trump during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where a man named Thomas Crooks nearly assassinated him. Judicial Watch has launched an investigation into this incident, revealing that Crooks had an altercation with Trump supporters and made hateful comments towards Trump before the shooting. Despite these red flags, the Secret Service did not intervene, raising concerns about their effectiveness. The FBI has been slow to release information about this incident, further fueling concerns about transparency and security for the president.
➡ Judicial Watch, an organization that investigates government misconduct, has raised concerns about the Secret Service’s accountability and protection of the President. They’ve also highlighted the alleged misuse of justice against supporters of former President Trump, including Rudy Giuliani, who was raided by the FBI in connection with his activities involving Ukrainian officials. Judicial Watch is seeking records about this raid and other issues, arguing that these actions expose a corrupt two-tiered system. They encourage the public to stay informed and support their work to expose government corruption.

Hey, everyone. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton here with our weekly update on social media. Thank you, as always, for joining us. So much great work being done here at Judicial Watch. We have crossed another humongous threshold, which is the removal of 6 million dirty names from the voter rolls nationally. It’s the result of new numbers. That 6 million number has been reached and arguably surpassed as a result of new information we have from the state of Colorado in response to a settlement and lawsuit. And just great work by our lawyers to clean up the voter rolls in Colorado.

They informed us that 372,000 inactive voters have been removed from Colorado’s voter rolls after Judicial Watch’s lawsuit and settlement. It is a remarkable number. It is, in my view, just in some ways, the tip of the iceberg in terms of names nationally that need to be released. I’ll get into that a little bit later. But now we are over 6 million names removed from the rolls or about to be removed from the rolls, thanks to Judicial Watch’s lawsuits and other legal actions. And we were at 5 million for a bit. Then we bumped up to nearly 6 because Oregon, in response to our lawsuit, announced they were removing, I think, over 800,000 names from the voting rolls.

So the 800,000 plus the 372 brings it to 1.8. And now we are well over 6 million names having been removed thanks to Judicial Watch’s legal work. And how is it this happens? So the National Voter Registration act is a federal law that requires states to take reasonable steps to maintain the voting list. It means that they got to remove them. The names of people who move away, die or otherwise are known to be ineligible. And it’s a really simple process. It just requires, at least under the litigation that we’ve initiated and essentially has been reaffirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, that they if you don’t show up to vote, you get a card saying, hey, where are you? You didn’t show up to vote this year.

And if you don’t vote in that, it’s for a federal election. And if you don’t vote in the next two federal elections or otherwise communicate that you still want to be on the registration list, they remove your name, or they’re supposed to. So in theory, it could take as long as five years plus to have your name removed if you move away without informing someone. And incredibly, the states still fight doing that. The left hates removing names from the voting rolls, at least the activist groups do. But in places like Colorado, a blue state, California, we settled a Case New York, we settled a case.

D.C. they removed hundreds, I think 138,000 names. When the lawsuits are brought or the legal actions commence, Judicial Watch is able to get even the bluest of the blue states to begin to comply with the law. And so that’s why we are getting, in the case of Colorado, 372,000 names removed. That’s why we’ve gotten, in the case of Oregon, the Secretary of State recently announced after our lawsuit was filed, I think he removed 160,000 names immediately, 600,000 are set to be removed. Subsequently in California, LA county removed 1.2 million names thanks to a Judicial Watch lawsuit and settlement.

So there is nothing comparable being done at the federal government, by the federal government or the state governments to kind of push this removal process to clean up the rolls as necessary under the nvra. Now, to the credit of the Trump Justice Department, Harmeet Dhillon has started asking for and demanding and been willing to go to court to get the full list of voter registration names so they can look at the names and see if there are illegal aliens on there or names that should be removed. And of course, the left wing states are fighting her in court.

But what’s great about what Judicial Watch is doing, and we’ve been doing it, by the way, since 2000, well, at least 15 years, I think, is that we’ve been initiating private actions to clean up the voter rolls. In fact, we’ve initiated, we are responsible for the first private actions in federal court to clean up the election rolls. We sued first in Indiana, we sued first in Ohio. We’ve sued in North Carolina. We sued in Kentucky. We’ve sued in, as I said, California, Colorado, Oregon, California, Illinois. Now, As I said, 6 million names have been removed thanks to Judicial Watch’s heavy lifting to clean up the voter list.

The challenge is there are probably 23, 24 million names that still need to be removed, meaning there are inactive names on the rolls, names that are susceptible to being removed under the law and likely are ineligible to vote. So there’s a big, big backup of dirty names on the voting rolls in various states across the country. And the fact that Judicial Watch has been able to force and require or persuade through a settlement. Right, Settlements, you know, settlements, when you settle, you are, you know, you agree to disagree. Right. And they don’t admit wrongdoing. And, you know, we will take credit as much as we’re able under the terms of the settlement, but we’re happy to come to settlements that doesn’t matter who you are if you’re going to clean the names, we’re not there to score political points.

We are there just to get the law enforced. Because dirty names can mean dirty elections. How is it that is the case? Because it is a pool of names from which fraudsters can draw to illegally vote. It’s that simple. And by the way, federal law requires the dirty names be cleaned up in a reasonable way. So to me, this is another extraordinary feather in the cap of the Judicial Watch legal team led by former Justice Department civil rights attorneys. This is a civil rights, this is civil rights litigation. When we’re cleaning up voting rolls, when we were upholding election integrity laws, when we’re trying to apply the rule of law to the voting process that’s designed to ensure that your votes are count and the system is run with integrity.

Voting is a core civil right and the left wants to destroy it in large measure by making it meaningless as a result of fraud or by keeping people home in many ways as a result of a system that people can’t rely on. And by Judicial Watches or moving forward to ensure the system is cleaner, fairer and follows the rule of law, it frankly encourages more people to vote because they in many ways will think their vote is more likely to count. And of course, this is only a portion of Judicial Watch’s election integrity work. Earlier this year, Judicial Watch obtained one of the most significant Supreme Court decisions on election law in recent memory.

Which is the affirmation or reaffirmation in our view, that candidates of course can sue to stop an election from being stolen. That’s my non lawyer way of putting it. But essentially the Court said that candidates have standing to challenge illicit ballot counting and other rules that can impinge on their, on their ability to run in a significant way or in any way at all. In large measure. That’s called the boss decision. And we are seemingly about to win another important election law case that we also brought before the Supreme Court, which is the challenge to the counting of ballots that arrive after election day.

These mail in ballots get in late, upwards of seven days, two weeks in Washington state. I think it’s 21 days. Under the theory of our opponents, there’s really no limit as to when you can get your ballot in late. And the Supreme Court seems sympathetic to the notion that federal election law, which sets federal elections on, what is it, the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, that means something. It means if your ballot gets in late, that’s too late. And it looks like we’re going to win that one you know, knock on wood. And that decision is expected from the Supreme Court one way or the other by the end of June.

So just in a few months. But is there anyone doing more to protect our elections than Judicial Watch? If so, I’d like to meet them. But in the meantime, if you want elections safe, if you want them secured, if you want them more honest, then you’re going to want to support Judicial Watch. Now, does it take the onus off the government to do what we’re doing and to try to enforce the rule of law? Of course not. Now, the Trump administration has been with us on a few of these cases. They, for instance, argued with us against this post Election Day counting of late ballots just last month.

But there’s been no comparable work in the history of America by the federal government in terms of cleaning up the rolls. There simply is nothing comparable. Now, the Justice Department, under Harmeet Dhillon and Trump’s leadership, is finally getting into that area. But it’s Judicial Watch that’s removed 6 million names from their voting rolls. It’s our work that’s done it. And we welcome additional activity by anyone else who wants to get involved, including the Feds. But we’ve got other work to do, and I think the feds need to always need to do more. And secondly, of course, we’ve got these other gaping holes in election security where you have too many states refusing to implement voter id.

And this is why you have the SAVE act that’s currently before the Senate, which would mandate a national, a national rule requiring voter ID for federal elections. And it would also, I think. Well, not. I think I know. It would also require citizenship verification when you’re registering to vote. Because right now, it’s the honor system. You sign a form saying, I’m a legal resident. I mean, I’m a citizen and I’m eligible to vote. Now, if you aren’t and you sign that form, you technically can go to jail, you can be prosecuted, but that’s not enforced. And it’s, why are we checking citizenship status? It doesn’t make any sense.

Why aren’t we checking voter id? It doesn’t make any sense. Of course it does make sense. If you want to be able to steal elections, if you want aliens to vote, foreign nationals to vote in elections, it does make perfect sense. And of course, that is the goal of the left, to allow non citizens to vote in our elections, turn America over to foreigners and voter id. Who knows who’s voting and how often with no voter id. So I see the left Opposed to everything that Judicial Watch is doing. And so much of the litigation I’ve talked about has been opposed by the radical left.

They come into court. Soros fronts, fronts for the Democratic Party, which, for reasons that I’ll let them explain, oppose virtually every election integrity measure. And we’ve done more than the Republican Party in key measures on most of these issues as well. Now, the Republicans have been more aggressive recently, but again, it’s Judicial Watch that’s kind of setting. Setting the standard. So this is just great news. This is great news. Now, of course, are we going to stop on this? Are we going to stop suing, stop initiating legal action, stop pushing? No, we are not. In fact, I can guarantee with reasonable certainty as president of Judicial Watch, there will be more legal action.

There will be more lawsuits to clean up voter rolls in the various states or big counties and states that aren’t cleaning up the rolls. So more is coming. We’ve cleaned 6 million, the latest number being 372,000 inactive names in Colorado. Again, that’s a lawsuit that began. When did the lawsuit begin in Colorado? Yeah, so we sued in 2020. We settled in 2023. And it takes a while to get the names cleaned off. I know you want it to go faster. I do, too. But the law is the law and the process is the process. But I can guarantee you none of it would have taken place without Judicial Watches litigation.

So this kind of shows you that you need a group with the institutional fortitude, expertise and support from the American people to kind of stick to it with this litigation, because it takes a long time in order to get the fullest and best results in election law litigation. I mean, what happens often is that a lot of groups start talking about, and parties especially, they start talking about election integrity during an election year. Well, you know, it’s really hard to kind of get litigation going to protect and ensure better election integrity during an election year. I mean, the timeframes that federal lawsuits at least take or state lawsuits take, it’s hard to do.

And this is why you need to be doing election law work, election integrity work, 24, seven, every year, even in non election years. So I encourage you to go to Judicial Watch’s website, our Internet site, and support our work, because there’s no one doing this type of work the way Judicial Watch is. It is an efficient way for you to ensure election integrity rules are being followed. You know, as I said, we’ve got potentially a Supreme Court decision that could change the laws in 30 states in which they count late Ballots, ballots that arrive late. And of course, there are always ongoing challenges to election integrity that need to be pursued.

And you can be sure we’re looking at and considering additional legal actions in new areas of election integrity enforcement that need to be pursued. So there’s nothing comparable to Judicial Watch’s expertise, demonstrated record of success. And so I respectfully ask for your support, because I tell you, the other thing that we have that many others don’t is that we got you and hundreds of thousands of other patriots who support our work, because without that support, we wouldn’t be able to do this great election work. It’s not free. We’ve got staff, we got to hire, our lawyers, we got to work with.

We’ve got a big team of lawyers here in Judicial Watch, we often have to hire lawyers on the outside to help us. I mean, I don’t need, I don’t probably need to convince you that litigation, investigations and just monitoring even these issues requires resources. And it’s because of those resources that you. Well, I hope you. But because of patriots and Judicial Watch supporters give to us that we’re able just to do this great work. So credit goes to our team, but credit goes to you, dear Judicial Watch supporter who allows this great work to continue. So go to our website, support our work and celebrate this great news.

And yeah, ask your local election officials what they’re doing to clean up the rolls, because they’re supposed to tell you that under law, you can look it up. So I encourage, and there are a lot of, and thanks to Judicial Watch’s leading work on this, a lot of citizens have figured out what to do and have been empowered to pursue cleanups of the voter rolls and get an understanding from their local and state election officials what they’re doing under law to ensure the election rolls are clean. So our work not only is direct, right, in terms of impact, but I’m also so proud of, and I think you as supporters should be proud of that.

Our work is indirect in the sense that it empowers and has educated so many Americans to get involved in election integrity efforts on their own. They don’t need Judicial Watch to tell them what to do. You’re citizens. You know what to do. It’s government. It’s not rocket science. So figure out what the rules are, understand how elections are run in your local community, in your state, and get active to the degree the law allows. I can’t encourage that enough. But if you can’t do that, or in addition to, I encourage you to support Judicial Watch because there’s simply nothing comparable.

I mean, for example, just I almost forgot we were, we had a team. I think it was an eight member team. I didn’t bring the. I didn’t. I don’t think maybe I do have the release monitoring the elections in Hungary. I mean, Judicial Watch’s work is so worldwide respected that we partnered with a group in Hungary to monitor the elections there. Now, typically, what goes on in a country like Hungary is the left swarms the area. And if Orban had won, for instance, in Hungary, you could be sure the left would have been screaming from the rafters about the election not being.

And that’s why it’s important for Judicial Watches for a group like Judicial Watch to participate in that type of process. Because the world was watching the Hungarian elections that, you know, we know what an election monitoring operation is supposed to do. The team was led by Bob Popper, again, a former senior official in the Civil Rights division of the Justice Department department who used to monitor elections at the Justice Department. One of his other colleagues who was a former IG and a former DOJ official, Sean o’, Donnell, was there as well, and other Judicial Watch legal teams members who.

And employees who have been involved in these issues before. So we’ve got a worldwide reach at Judicial Watch in terms of election integrity. So just great work all around. So I can’t say enough about our great work here, but I’m going to move on because we’ve got more great work to talk about, including some disturbing material that again, your Judicial Watch heavy lifting uncovered through a FOIA lawsuit about the assassination attempt that led to the death of an innocent American and injuries of others. In Butler, Pennsylvania, two years ago, Judicial Watch sued the FBI for records of the Butler related to the Butler assassination attempt.

It was like a year we waited. They didn’t give us anything. And now it’s been one year almost completely, and they finally started giving us documents in tranches. So we had one tranche released to us, I guess, a few months ago that we talked about here, detailing issues about Secret Service failures at Butler. And we just got another batch of documents that we released earlier. And I’ve got some context for the prior work, I think I posted on the website here. And of course, all of this is the result of a catastrophic failure by the Secret Service to protect President Trump.

Inexcusable. The more we learn, the more outrageous it is. And you can be sure that Judicial Watch will. Well, a, we’ve initiated a massive, a massive investigation into the Secret Service failure. We already have upwards of 20 open records law, open records investigations requests at the federal, state and local level over this shooting. Because I don’t know about you, I don’t trust the federal agencies, the FBI, the Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security, its mother agency, even Congress, you know, promises made. We pushed hard for the release of these records or records related to the attempt to kill President Trump up in Butler, Pennsylvania.

And initially we were only able to get records from the local police in Pennsylvania. We got documents or pictures of. Is it Thomas Crooks, the shooter? That had not previously been released is only because of Judicial Watch, Congress has been completely absent on this. AWOL on it. And so, as I said, we had this longstanding litigation with the FBI and they finally started releasing documents. And the new batch of documents just further confirm very serious and disturbing failures of security, like core competencies related to the federal protective net that was supposed to be around the former president at the time, the candidate at the time President Trump.

And this is the headline from the, from our release. And I’ll give. Look at this. FBI records reveal altercation at Trump rally site. Before shooting Crooks was making hateful comments towards Trump. So this is the news you had witnesses tell the FBI in these reports, released for the first time only to Judicial Watch, exclusively to Judicial Watch, that Thomas Crooks was involved in altercations with Trump supporters, was making hateful comments directed at Trump immediately before he went and shot at President Trump. In fact, he walked from the altercation and went up on the roof and minutes later nearly killed President Trump.

Now, this hasn’t been reported before because the FBI has been sitting on this information for years, which is bothersome, to put it mildly. So let’s get into some of the details here. Now, the number of records that are being released are woefully small in terms of the volume. We just got 27 records, this time heavily redacted. I think the last material was about 30 records, the last batch. So it’s really a kind of a modified limited hangout. We filed the lawsuit in July of 2025, and we’re now just getting just the beginnings of the records they might have about the Butler assassination.

I could read you everything we’re asking about, but it’s a pretty comprehensive lawsuit, and I’m glad the FBI is finally beginning to release this information. It’s, you know, it’s never too late to be transparent, but we’ve had instances where we could wait for years and years and years, even though it’s outrageous to wait for two years. You know, we could be waiting for six years sometimes. So I’m not going to look this gift horse in the mouth. I’m going to celebrate the release, but express concern at the same time about the pace of the release and why it took so long to begin releasing the information at all.

And this doesn’t just apply to the Trump Justice Department. The Biden gang was sitting on this as well. And finally, the Trump people figured out we need to start getting this material out because it’s important. A July 17th 302 investigative report. Now, 302 investigative report is a report written by the FBI documenting interview, witness interviews. I mean, that’s my layman’s understanding of what 302s are. And it’s really quite the racket, in my view, because they don’t make recordations typically of these interviews. So they’re kind of narratives of what is said. They’re seen as generally reliable, I guess, in the courts.

I’ll defer to the defense lawyers out there or the prosecutors of just how reliable they are. But you can imagine my skepticism about a process where the FBI, the only record of an interview is a report written by the FBI agent and his colleague who participated in the interview. There’s no written record or no recordation of the interviews at all, typically. So, Anyway, we get these 302s, and these 302s are the basis for this release, because the information that I’m talking about is in these witness interviews documented in these 302 reports. So one report states it was a July 17th report.

When was this shooting? When was the shooting of President Trump? What was the day? July 13th. So it was a few days after the shooting. A woman who attended the Trump rally was interviewed by the FBI and reported that crooks, quote, had an altercation with a group of people in the area where the woman was standing prior to the shooting. The witness continued that, quote, she observed crooks climbing the building a short time after the interaction. So it’s clear he’s arguing with Trump supporters. Because this is another report that shows another rally attendee. Actually, it’s the same report interviewed by agents, said he also heard the altercation involving Crooks at the rally.

The report states, in the name of the witnesses, redacted, which is, I guess, appropriate, reported just before Donald Trump came on the stage. Crooks was making hateful comments towards Trump. The witness wasn’t sure if crooks was filming the event or speaking with someone on his cell phone. So the witness obviously heard the altercation with the Trump supporters. Then he Witnessed. And this is, I think, very interesting. Crooks on the phone. And he wasn’t sure if he was filming Trump while he was saying these hateful comments. Maybe he was providing commentary. I don’t know what that was about, but it was like maybe he was, according to the witness, talking on the phone.

The witness wasn’t sure, which would be extremely interesting for obvious reasons. But either way, this guy was causing a commotion, this potential murderer of the president in a very public way. And then he goes up on the roof. Where on earth was the Secret Service? I mean, you have a guy causing a commotion and the security isn’t there to at least take note of it and take action and say, what’s going on here? And I tell you, these documents, beyond this kind of interesting witness testimony, have information from law enforcement officials who were there, who essentially say, look, you know, we were there.

I showed up. There’s no communication. I don’t know who knew what about what briefings. I mean, it’s, you know, another series of reports documenting the lack of communication among the Secret Service and local law enforcement and other law enforcement that were there. Because it wasn’t just Secret Service that were there. You obviously had, I think you had, from what I recall, HSI there, which is Homeland Security folks, also providing support. So it’s like failure on top of failure. We knew about the lack of security, communications, coordination. And then I keep on going back to that video and I think, let’s play it here.

We’re going to play it. And you know, that’s a little bit old, that chart. That chart’s a couple of months old. And if you want to really see something that said, take a look at what happened. Move when you’re ready. On you ready. Move, move, go. Hawkey’s here. Okay. We are watching live at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where former President Trump. Trump was speaking on the stage. There has been some kind of disturbance that clearly sets law enforcement and Secret Service into motion immediately jumping around the former president in a protective mode. The crowd has been screaming.

They are standing by. You can hear some voices there saying, are we ready to go? Are we ready to go? We are looking at President Trump. This does not look good. I’m going to be honest with you. From what we can see right here, it looks like they are attempting to move him out, that he may have been injured. He is holding up his arm, he is pumping his fist, but clearly Secret Service wants to get him out of this situation. He is attempting to stand and walk on his own. He has Got his hand pumping, pumping in the air.

His fist is pumping in the air. But Queen quickly, they are removing him from the stage. And you see in that video where it just drives me crazy to see how long it took for them to get Trump out of there. And of course, you see the Secret Service female agent acting as if she never holstered or had handled a weapon before. It was a nightmare. As I said in the press release, it shouldn’t have taken two years in a federal lawsuit to find out that the Butler shooter was involved in an altercation with Trump supporters and made hateful comments towards Trump at the Butler rally minutes before he nearly killed Trump.

These new FBI documents are disturbing and astonishing, detailing more conduct by the shooter that should have gotten the attention of Secret Service. And this is why, you know, and I’m sure many of you share my concerns. I’m terribly concerned about the safety of the president. I think the Secret Service is a dysfunctional organization. The proof is the pudding. He’s been nearly killed twice while under their alleged protection, story after story. And Judicial Watch has been investigating Secret Service for years now, decades, in some respects. Shows that it is kind of a nightmare agency in terms of accountability, in terms of they had the DEI craziness that I don’t think has been sufficiently curtailed, Really.

Contempt for the lying agents out there in a way that destroys morale and it puts the agents at risk and it puts the protectees at risk. And I just see material like this where there’s an eruption at a rally for the president or the number one candidate for President of the United States at the time, and nothing’s done. And we still got records and lawsuits pending on all sorts of issues. Remember, the president was confronted by those leftists at the restaurant as the Secret Service stood around almost waiting for something to happen before they would act.

It was crazy. Those were the Code Ping protesters. You can look it up, watch the video. We’ve got lawsuit after lawsuit. You can go to our website and look at them at our press release. You’ll have the link there. Following up on all sorts of issues related to the Secret Service and the protection of the President. I don’t know about you, I consider this an important aspect of Judicial Watch’s work because in my view, lives are at stake with this one, including the President’s. So to read all the Butler documents, go to judicialwatch.org, the links below.

And again, share the wealth. What do I mean by share the wealth? The important educational materials about what your government’s up to and what it’s not up to in bad ways, at least with respect to the Secret Service, because this information is blockbuster. One of the things I like about Judicial Watch is that we don’t forget. Judicial Watch remembers. And from the media perspective and the left wing perspective, they believe they should get a pass on all scandals, all controversies. And whatever narrative they have about a scandal, whatever narrative they have about an abuse should be accepted and we should never look behind it.

So in the case, for example, of the lawfare against President Trump and his supporters and lawyers and associates, everyone, including Judicial Watch, yours truly, where they abused us, I was only technically a witness, but people have had their homes raided for no good reason or suspicious reasons. People are losing their bar licenses as the lawfare continues weaponization of the bar discipline process in California. I don’t know if you saw the news this week. Dr. John Eastman, a friend of mine, has bar license taken away from him by the left wing activists in the California bar system.

And what was the purpose, what was the alleged reason for taking his bar license away? He had the wrong views as a lawyer on the 2020 election dispute. Another lawyer who was attacked was America’s Mayor, Rudy Giuliani. And we’ve partnered with Rudy to get records about the outrageous raid on his home by the Biden gang in 2021. On April 28, 2021, at approximately 6:00am 6:00am, former mayor of New York City, former U.S. attorney, esteemed lawyer, the FBI treats him like a common criminal, raids his home at 6am that’s the Biden FBI. And we’re supposed to forget that happened? We’re not forgetting it happened.

We just sued about it. They raided his home, his office, seized his cell phone and other electronic devices. I think they didn’t take Hunter’s laptop, if I recall. I mean, if that doesn’t tell you something, I don’t know what would. And so we asked for the records about that outrageous raid and Rudy Giuliani sign the necessary paperwork because sometimes they’ll say, oh, no, no, no, you can’t get information about someone else in circumstances like this. Well, we had the authorization signed by President by Rudy Giuliani to get the information. According to public reports, the raid was tied to an investigation into whether Giuliani was violated the Foreign Agents Registration act in connection with his activities involving Ukrainian officials while he was seeking information related to Joe Biden and his son.

Hunter Giuliani’s then attorney, Robert Costello, noted that federal agents ignored Hunter Biden’s computer hard drives when they raided the apartment contradicting the order on the warrant to quote, seize every electronic device in his home. So this was in retaliation for. Because Rudy, as you may recall, Mayor Giuliani was taking the lead in exposing the Ukraine corruption tied to the Biden crime family. And they concocted this Farah foreign agents registration scheme which they recently then had recently started using to target Trump people. First time in history it was used to prosecute, maybe not the second time, but it really has never been used, practically speaking, to produce, to charge people criminally.

It’s an administrative issue. So what a corrupt bag of rocks that Biden operation was, huh? The Biden’s DOJ pre dawn raid on Rudy Giuliani was a textbook example of weaponized justice targeting a loyal advocate of President Trump’s. While agents deliberately ignored Hunter Biden’s hard drives sitting in the same apartment. This selective enforcement exposes a corrupt two tiered system. So I hope we get records more quickly than we did about the near killing of President Trump, about the abuse of Rudy Giuliani. And these abuse records are beginning to come out and trickle out. And I will give some modest credit to the FBI and the Justice Department for beginning to use FOIA more aggressively to get information out rather than fighting us tooth and nail or just ignoring our requests.

For example, we received Mar A Lago raid documents a little bit ago. I talked about it recently, confirming that the FBI thought there was no probable cause to raid President Trump’s home. And of course that was ignored. And they went in there like gangbusters. It’s abuse after abuse after abuse. I’ll tell you, there’s been no one who’s done more to expose and litigate the truth about the deep state lawfare against President Trump. A scandal that is unprecedented in American history. It goes back a decade plus, lawsuit after lawsuit, request after request. And what’s even worse for the deep state is that we talk about it.

We don’t hide the records we get too often. Congress actually hides records they get. So hopefully we get some information about what was going on with the targeting of Mayor Giuliani. I mean, Giuliani is the type of guy who should be getting medal after medal for the work he’s done. Not, you know, obviously he was America’s mayor and his leadership in New York generally and around 9 11, but his anti corruption work that continued thanklessly. His work for election integrity which continued thankfully. Well, forget about thanklessly, he was punished for it by the deep state. So, you know, here’s this update is a great example of the scope and nature and importance of Judicial Watch’s work.

And I encourage you to not only support our work financially, obviously we only are able to operate this thanks to the voluntary contributions of American patriots. But I also encourage you to share the wealth, get the word out. And if you’re watching this online, well, you are watching this online almost inevitably. It’s the nature of our program. Comment, like, share, do everything to kind of get the video showed to more Americans. And the way to do that is to interact with the video, follow the channel on YouTube or on Rumble or you know, push the account on Truth Social on X on Facebook and Instagram.

I think we’re on, I know we’re on TikTok as well. Just get the word out. And the more people who know about what’s going on in this great country of ours, the better our liberty will be protected because an informed populace is going to be quite is much more jealous of encroachments and abuses of the government if they know about it than if they go day to day without knowing about it. And if Judicial Watch weren’t around, we wouldn’t know much of anything about government corruption here in Washington D.C. so I encourage you to support our work and those of you who have done it already, thank you.

I encourage you to think about donating again and in the meantime, have a wonderful week and I’ll see you here next time on the Judicial Watch weekly update. Thanks for watching. Don’t forget to hit that subscribe button and like our video down below.
[tr:tra].

See more of Judicial Watch on their Public Channel and the MPN Judicial Watch channel.