➡ The text discusses a presentation about artificial intelligence (AI) and its use in interpreting U.S. tax laws. The speaker, Peymon Mottahedeh, president of Freedom Law School, believes that no law requires U.S. citizens to file or pay federal income taxes. He uses Google’s Gemini AI to analyze the Internal Revenue Code and a petition from his website, which argues that average Americans are not legally required to pay federal income taxes. However, the AI concludes that U.S. citizens are indeed legally required to pay federal income taxes, rejecting the petition’s interpretation of the tax code.
➡ The text discusses the importance of relying on U.S. Supreme Court decisions over lower court rulings when interpreting laws. The author emphasizes that laws are made by legislators and can only be changed or interpreted differently by the Supreme Court. They argue that lower court decisions do not alter laws as written by Congress and that everyone, including the IRS, should follow Supreme Court decisions. The author also discusses specific Supreme Court cases and their implications for interpreting tax laws.
➡ The text is a conversation between a man named Kale and a tax expert. Kale hasn’t filed his taxes since 2019 and is seeking advice on how to avoid trouble with the IRS. The expert suggests joining a program called Restore Freedom Plan, which can protect him from the IRS taking his money. However, the expert warns that Kale’s case is slightly weakened because he filed a 1040 income tax form for 2025 due to bankruptcy. Another caller, Scott, asks about selling his property and moving to Panama, but the conversation ends before the expert can provide advice.
➡ The speaker advises against moving to foreign countries for financial freedom, as many expatriates eventually return to the U.S. due to cultural and social challenges. Instead, he suggests moving to rural areas in states with no income tax, like Florida, Tennessee, or Texas, for a lower cost of living. He also discusses the reality of tax evasion and the potential consequences, using the example of a friend who went to prison for not filing tax returns. Lastly, he mentions a membership plan for financial protection, but advises that it’s not necessary for everyone.
➡ The speaker is advocating for self-education about the US Constitution, Bill of Rights, and tax laws to avoid being taken advantage of by the government. He shares his personal experience of not paying income taxes for 34 years without legal repercussions due to his knowledge of the law. He encourages listeners to visit his website, freedomlawschool.org, to educate themselves and take action. He also promotes distributing brochures about their cause and offers rewards for doing so.
➡ The text explains the process of joining a program called the Restore Freedom Plan. To join, you need to visit their website, click on the membership application, and fill out the form honestly, including your income. Your membership fee is calculated as 30% of what you would have paid to the IRS. If you lie about your income, you won’t be protected by the program. Once you’ve paid your membership fee, you’ll receive a receipt. The program offers protection against the IRS, legal consultation, and reimbursement if the IRS takes your money. You can also earn rewards for referring others to the program.
➡ The speaker advises against filing for bankruptcy and paying estate taxes, arguing that they are unnecessary and costly. He also suggests that income tax, federal unemployment taxes, and corporate tax do not apply to people in the 50 states. He warns against signing 1040 income tax forms, claiming they give the IRS power to audit you. He also discusses a case where a New York resident received a notice of proposed driver’s license suspension due to unpaid state tax debts.
➡ The text discusses the importance of understanding tax laws and the options available to individuals. It suggests ignoring IRS audit letters and challenging them in court to prevent expansion to other years. It also recommends joining the Restore Freedom Plan for protection against future issues. The text also discusses the need to pay annual fees to maintain LLCs, with a suggestion to switch to states with no annual fees. The speaker encourages self-education through their website, freedomlawschool.org, and offers assistance in understanding IRS authority and freeing oneself from income tax obligations. The Restore Freedom Plan is presented as a guaranteed protection plan against legal issues with the IRS. The speaker concludes by encouraging listeners to spread the truth about tax laws and join the Restore Freedom Plan.
➡ The text discusses the different definitions of ‘United States’ in two tax codes – the oil tax and the FICA tax. The oil tax includes all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories. However, the FICA tax, which is the Social Security tax, has a different definition that only includes U.S. territories. The text questions why these definitions are different and how they should be interpreted.
➡ The text discusses the legal interpretation of the term “United States” in sections 3121E and 7701A. It argues that the 50 states are not included in these definitions, based on the court case Gould vs. Gould, which states that tax laws should not be extended beyond their clear language. The text suggests that including the 50 states would require implication, which is not allowed under Gould vs. Gould. Therefore, the text concludes that the 50 states are not part of the “United States” as defined in these sections.
➡ This text discusses the interpretation of tax laws, specifically the term “United States” and “states”. It emphasizes the importance of using the definitions provided by Congress, rather than ordinary meanings, when interpreting these laws. The text also references several court cases to support this argument. The author suggests that the term “states” includes all states and D.C., and that the term “United States” should be interpreted strictly based on the definitions provided by Congress.
➡ The text discusses a debate about the interpretation of certain legal terms and their implications. The speaker argues against the misuse of words to imply exclusions that don’t exist in law. They also discuss the importance of adhering to the exact wording of laws and not making assumptions. The speaker plans to continue this discussion in a future session.
➡ The text discusses the pitfalls of universal life insurance policies, describing them as scams that mix insurance with savings, confusing customers and charging high fees. The speaker advises against such policies, suggesting instead to invest in gold, silver, or bitcoin. They also mention the importance of understanding your rights when dealing with the IRS, and the potential dangers of filing a 1040 form. Lastly, they touch on the topic of converting bitcoin into cash for charitable donations, but the discussion is incomplete.
➡ The text is a conversation between a host and various callers asking about tax and estate planning. The host clarifies that he isn’t an expert in estate planning but can refer callers to professionals. He also reassures callers about IRS notices, explaining they’re computer-generated and can be ignored. The host encourages callers to learn about tax laws and not be intimidated by the IRS. The conversation ends with a caller asking about sending a W4 form to his employer.
➡ The text discusses a conversation about handling legal documents and dealing with the IRS. It emphasizes that most employees, especially clerks, don’t have the time or interest to read and understand legal documents. It also mentions the possibility of becoming a member of Freedom Law School and the potential risks involved. The conversation ends with a discussion about passport denial by the IRS and the importance of exercising one’s rights.
➡ The speaker discusses the importance of cooperation and learning from others in legal matters, using the example of Sherry Jackson who was convicted and sentenced to prison due to her refusal to seek help and learn from others. The speaker emphasizes the dangers of following baseless legal theories and the importance of understanding and following the law. He also mentions his own success in legal battles due to his willingness to learn from others and stay humble. Lastly, he advises against signing tax confession forms without understanding the implications and encourages people to seek advice and work together, just like America’s founding fathers did.

Hello, my friends. In this presentation, you will hear about artificial intelligence. We used Google’s Gemini to find out whether by law you, one of the people of the 50 United States, is required to file and pay income taxes or not. Artificial intelligence is very commonly used and has gotten better and better and better at answering complex questions for everybody. Here is the Internal Revenue Code, the bible of the IRS. Over 10,000 pages of gobbledygook, tiny fonts, minutiae, tissue thief, paper of confusion. But I tell you what, I believe, Peymon Mottahedeh, as president of Freedom Law School, that no law requires you, any of the people of the 50 United States, to file or pay federal income taxes.

So let’s go against AI Gemini and ask that question and let’s see what it comes up with. Okay? I expect him at first to question me or disagree with me, but I’m gonna feed it the truth, insist on it following the law. Let’s see what happens. Because I’ve done two different AIs before. We did GROK before. And what was the other one AI that we did, guys? We did GROK and gpg. So this is our third AI challenge. Let’s go to it. If you’ve not been to our website, freedomlawschool.org that’s where you want to go to find out how you can be free of income tax, slavery, payroll taxes, federal corporate taxes, estate taxes, all for free by following the law as found on government’s official legal websites that we are going to feed to Gemini AI right now.

So see what it says. Here it is. This is Gemini at Google. We already put our petitions on here. The petition in there already is this. Okay, this is a petition we have on our website for free@freedomlawschool.org written for your representative in the House of Representatives and each of your two U.S. senators. Okay, here we go. You can just fill in the blank, put their names. Okay. Of the end of your congressman on there. Senators and these petitions talk about the justification for congressional investigation of unlawful collection of individual income taxes by the irs. In this petition, what we do is we tell the congressmen members that we are writing to share some amazing discoveries we found about federal income tax laws.

If you will kindly consider what we have discovered, we think you will feel like investigating further for yourself and will probably want to share these findings with your fellow Congress members. You could be instrumental in correcting a couple of critical misunderstandings of the income tax laws that have for many decades led to terrible injustices inflicted on the citizen of the 50 states of America for over 75 years by the principal officers of the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice and some federal judges collectively. Hereafter, government renegades. Okay, the income tax code seems mind numbingly long and tediously complex.

But in this letter we will reveal the short and simple truth of who is required by law to pay federal income taxes. When you see who is required to pay, you will see that the average Americans like us are not required to pay pay. So that’s the question at issue and then what the petition does below that. Again, it’s free, available at freedomlawschool.org you can see it for yourself and I encourage you to send it to your congressman for answers. They’re the lawmakers. The law is made by legislative branch of the government, the House of Representatives, signed by the US Senate and signed by the President.

That’s how federal laws are made. State laws have a similar process, right? So what we do, we have the federal income tax law deciphered, broken down about who is required by the Internal Revenue Code, IRC to pay federal income taxes. So we start at the very beginning, subtitle A chapter 1, section 1, and we quote the law verbatim Every time in his petitions, you’ll see quotation mark with italics quotation inside of it. That is exact language of the law, page after page, okay? We spell out the law and connect the dots. Okay? Here is more exact quotes.

So I’m just going to scroll down for you to see that this is what the petition looks like. We emphasize some things by boldening, we quote the law, we quote Supreme Court decisions in the law, okay? And then at the end of this letter, we ask congressman to refute us or correct us or agree with us, okay? And so at the end of this letter where we sign it and you see, we’re almost to there right now. Here we go. We sign it right here. We’ll look forward to your timely, specific and on point reply. Why I have not required a file of income tax.

Because we tell the congressman, look, okay, if you can show me I’m wrong and that we do owe federal income taxes, we will gladly pay all taxes due and will consider such payment to be our fair share if they can show us that we’re wrong, okay? And we ask in Gemini for help about all this, okay? So, and you see in this petition at the end of it, we have attached all of the legal authorities that’s quoted in the letter from A to K. Not only we have the legal citations or name of these cases and Laws quoted.

But on top of that we have them actually attached. Attachment A. You know here there’s one of them. Okay. Tax imposed section one. You know, every one of them is right there. Attachment B. Code of federal regulations. So let’s. That’s already given to AI here. I’m going to hit. Now I’m going to tell. Okay, ask Jim and I asked the question. Okay. I’m going to tell Gemma not to please read this attached petition and tell me if me as one of the citizens of the 50 United States of America. Or am not required to file and pay federal income taxes.

Okay, let’s see. I’m going to correct my spelling typos of that. Okay. So that it doesn’t misunderstand me. Okay. All right, now that we got on there. All right, we need to end there. All right, let’s give it a go. Submit. All right, let’s see what AI does now. Gemini. Okay, now remember, by the way, this is the most advanced version of Gemini available right now. It’s 3.5. Okay. And on top of that, okay, it is the extended. Extended. The more thinking one that there is. Okay. Now I think what’s going to happen is he’s going to try to.

Gemini will respond with some lower level court cases. Okay. That’s what they usually do with AIs. I’m going to tell them no go only by the highest sources of law. But there’s already answer. Let’s see what it says. Okay, it says the short answer. Citizens of the 50 United States of America are legally required to pay federal income tax on their taxable income. Okay. It says. Go on. It says, while the tax petition outlines a meticulously structured argument utilizing specific sections of the interim of the code and select civic court citations, federal courts and internal room service have uniformly consistently rejected this interpretation.

Under established federal law, the US citizens residing within any of the 50 states are fully subject to the federal income tax system. Okay. All right, let’s see. All right. Now, analysis of the petition’s core arguments. The petition relies on highly literal restrictive reading of statute definition within interrupting the code’s glossary. Here’s a breakdown of how those arguments are structured and wide for a court. Interpret them differently. Okay, let’s see. Got one. How many? Got two. Okay, it’s not too long. Let’s go through it. Let’s see what it says. The geographic scope of the United States. The petitioner’s argument.

The petition cites section 7701A9, which defines the United States in a geographical sense. That’s only the states and the District of Columbia and section 7109A10 which states that states shall be construed to include day District of Columbia. The petition applies the canon of construction especial unis est exclusio alterius, which the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another. That’s right. To argue that state means only District of Columbia, thereby excluding the 50 sovereign states and rendering their citizens non resident aliens for tax purposes. Legal reality. Okay. The federal court reject this restrictive reading by pointing to interim code section 701, which explicitly addresses the tax code’s internal rules of construction.

It states the terms included, including when used in this definition contained in this title, shall not be deemed to exclude other things otherwise within the meaning of the term defined. Okay. Consequently, court interpret the word include in section 710810 as the term of enlargement or extension, meaning an additional 50 states also encompasses the District of Columbia rather than term of limitation. Okay, now talk about scope of trade or business, which also we have in there petitioner’s argument looks like. So I’m going to. I’m going to focus on that part. Okay. On this part. About that. Okay.

On this, about this whole terms of enlargement. So what it says is basically, even though the federal tax law, it’s remnant code, the section 7701A which defines terms, it does not include the 50 states in definition of the United States. They say it includes things that are otherwise in there. Well, let’s go remind this AI of certain key things about the law that I figured that doesn’t know. Okay, I’m going to remind him of this. Okay. Okay. I’m going to talk to him. Okay. Okay. So I’m going to say this. Okay, here we go. Okay. And here we go.

Okay. I’m gonna tell them this. The law. Here we go. Hold on. Okay. The law is made only by the legislator legislators and can only be modified or interpreted differently by the U.S. supreme Court. I got to go a little slower, guys. Sorry. I’m not very good at typing. I’m kind of, you know, slow on that stuff. So. Sorry, I got to slow down and correct my little typos. Okay. Okay. All right. Lower court decisions do not change the laws as written by Congress of United States. Therefore, I want you. Okay, let’s do a little decisions.

Okay, let’s see. There’s a little more corrections on my typing. Okay, here we go. United States and decisions. Here we go. States. Therefore, I want you to only rely on U.S. supreme Court decisions and lower and ignore lower court decision decisions. Okay, in arriving at your answer. Okay, now I’m going to tell you guys in a minute why I say that. That’s a very important point why we do not go by the lower court decision. Okay? If you go to the IRS, to, to IRS website, look at this, guys. Okay? In step one, okay, about the law, I quote the IRS that says this.

Okay? According to the IRS, that. Here’s a quote. A case decided by the U.S. supreme Court becomes the law of the land and takes precedence over decisions of lower courts. We all know that. No question about that, right? The Supreme Court is higher than lower level courts and takes precedence, strikes them out, doesn’t matter what this lower court says. Supercourse is. Otherwise we have to go by the US Supreme Court, not the lower federal courts or other courts. Right now, here it is. The IRS must follow Supreme Court decisions, and so should all of us. So should Gemini, the government, everybody must follow your Supreme Court decision decisions.

We agree. Right. And decisions by lower courts are binding on the IRS only for the particular taxpayer and the years litigated. And you want to see the exact language of that from the IRS own training manner for its employees? It’s right here. I got it from this part right here. Okay. So you can go back and check this out. Slow read for yourself. So, so now please answer my question again. Let’s see what it says this time. That we’re going to go only by US Supricor decisions because they are over the lower court decisions. Okay? That’s where we got to go by all of us.

And we’re going to go by all these super court decisions. And that’s the main, by the way, folks, that you’ll come out there a lot. Iris throws your lower court decisions out of context. Does it apply to you or your argument? And says, oh, just get out of here. Get out of here, boy. Go, go, go, go, go. You know, so let’s see, let’s see what the Gemini just responded. Okay. Okay. Accepting your constraint completely, we look exclusively at the binding precedents issued by the Supreme Court of the United States to answer this question. Okay, okay, here we go.

Based on high court decisions, citizens of 50 states are legally required to pay federal income taxes. The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed the broader authority of the federal income tax and has specifically rejected the structural interpretations rely upon in the PTC on the original income taxes. Okay, all right. So he talks about, oh, look at the constitutional authority. He talks about Bruce Haver versus UN Pacific Railroad okay. In this landmark case, Supricourt upheld the constitutionality of the sixth Amendment. Okay. The court ruled that Congress has full power to limit income tax on individuals throughout the nation without requirement of apportioning the tax among individual states based on census data.

Okay. And the quote, Glenshawn commissioners at Glenshaw case. Okay. And here, of course, is summarizing the court case. Okay. So they’re talking about. Here’s the court interprets to include the law. So here he’s not addressing my case, my cases. He’s quoting other cases, but not the cases that I got. So I’m going to have to give him the language of the court cases explicitly, separately. Okay, so let’s go back to AI. And now I’m going to give it the court cases more in Germany. I want to give him this. In Stamberg vs Carhartt, I’m going to tell him this right here.

Okay. As Gemini in. Okay, okay. In the petition, it states. And I’m going to quote it this time, right? Exact quote of that. That. Here we go. I have already the language of it already saved up. When a statute includes the explicit definition, we must follow that definition, even if it varies from that term’s ordinary meaning is axiomatic, self evident obvious that the statute or definition of the term excludes unstated meanings of the term. We’re going to put that in there too. Okay, let’s put that in there. And in the other Supreme Court case of Gould versus Gould, I’m going to bring up right now, this is U.S.

supreme Court tax case in 1917. Right. Okay. And okay. Okay. Which is a tax case. Okay. Whoops. All right, let’s correct my writing, which is a tax case. Okay. Let’s see whether the court said, and I’m going to quote it for AI, this exact language copy. All right, so let’s put it in there. Here’s what it says. Yep. Okay. And I’m saying both of these cases are cited in the petition, as I have done here. Okay. All right. Okay. Okay. All right. So now I want you to strictly observe these two U.S. supreme Court holdings to interpret the meaning of the terms.

So you got to do that, guys. You got to, you know, go back and argue with these AIs. Okay. The term terms state. And United States. Okay. All right. All right. Remember that all doubt must be, Must be decided most strongly against the government power to tax. All right, let’s see what I did this time. Okay. All right. To tax. Okay. All right. All right. Let’s see what it says because that’s what they try to do. They try to use lower court cases, which they ignore the US Supreme Court decisions because the lower courts want to keep the system going.

They’ve taken an oath to uphold the Constitution and protecting your rights, your money, your property, but they actually focus on protecting the socialist income tax system. Okay, let’s see. Okay. Is it step one, applying stomach and me to the gloss area. Okay. Beholding from Stenberg. Okay. If you strictly look at the explicit geographic Definitions of the IRC 7701A9 United States, okay. And quotes it and 10 states, okay? Following Stenberg, we are required to look at for an explicit statute definition of the operative verb bridging these terms includes. Because if Congress explicitly defines includes stomach mandates that we follow the definition to the exclusion of all ordinary dictionary meanings.

Okay, fine. Okay. The IRC contains exactly that exclusive definition. Okay? IRC 701C. The term includes, including, when used in that definition contained in this title, shall not be deemed to exclude other things otherwise with the meaning of the term the defined. Defined. Okay. Stamber conclusion. Now, by strictly observing Stemberg holding that explicit statute definition override everything else, we are legally bound to apply Congress’s explicit definition of includes. Besides 701C, exclusive commands that includes cannot be used to exclude unstated meanings of things. Standard prevents us from reading including District of Columbia. An exclusive definition of that shuts out the 56.

Okay, so it’s going there with that. How about Gould vs. Gould? Okay. By the holding establishes that we cannot extend tax purposes by implication and in case of doubt, they are construed most strongly against the government and in favor of citizens. Okay, let’s see what it says to apply. Goolbe must ask is there an architectural doubt or ambiguity in the war state and United States once the rule is applied, okay. No extension by implication. We are not extending the tax bill by implication to reach the 50 states. 50 states already within the ordinary inherent meaning of the word state.

All that’s where it’s going. It’s already there. No statutory doubt. Okay? Ambiguity arises only if a term can be interpreted in two conflicting reasonable ways. However, because Congress provided a clear explicit structural definition of 7701, saying that includes is the term of enlargement meaning 50 states plus D.C. the text average with geometric clarity. Okay, all right. So here they try and say that, okay? They say, oh, it’s obviously there. 50 states are obviously there. We don’t have to even worry about it. Everybody knows it’s got to be there. So that’s how this is going. Okay. It’s implying.

So what I’m going to do. Okay. Is a little bit more. Okay. So its conclusion is that State explicitly means 50 sovereign states. Okay. And United States means 50 states. Okay. What I’m going to do now, I’m going to give it two code sections to say what they mean. I’m going to give the oil tax and the tax of fica, which have different definitions. Okay. We’re going to go to our freed law school statutory hub. Okay. Which we have it, I think, up here. Don’t we have it the hub up here, guys? Yeah, there it is.

Yep. So we let go and have definitions on the left hand side. By the way, you can find them here on the educational. Go down to statute reference hub right here. Okay, so if you click on that, you got contrasting definitions. Not applying to income tax. Okay. Any position income tax. Wait a minute. Jail definitions. I think it’s in general definitions. Right. Guys, let’s see, let’s go on this. Can we have it here? Okay. All right, let’s see where we have it here. United States, States. United States. Here we go. Yep. Okay, here we go. This is the oil tax.

4612. Okay. So I’m going to tell Gemini this. Here we go. This is a code section about oil taxes. Okay, so here we go. Okay, here we go. Asking oil taxes as listed in section. I want to put it on there. Paste. Okay. Defines the term United States. As including. And specifically includes. Includes 50 states. Okay. Specifically include 50 states. Okay. All right. District of Colombia and a bunch of US Territories. Okay. All right. Okay. All right. Okay. See it in my petition I gave you. Okay. All right. Okay, there we go. Now I’m going to add, however.

And another one I’m going to give is the tax on fica. And that’s out of your paycheck comes out, guys, that’s Social Security tax, so called out of your paycheck. FICA has a different definition. Okay, in fica, let’s see, they have a very unique definition of state of the United States. Let’s get that here. The FICA is 3121E. Guys, let’s go down to 31.21E. Here we go. Do we have it here? 31, here we go. Employment state, United States. Okay. Okay. All right. Yep. I think we just passed the United States. There we go. 3121A. Okay, so here it is.

3121. E2. Okay. And E1. Okay. We’re going to go talk about that definition in. Yeah, in there. Let’s see. We’re going to have that definition right here. 3121E2 and 3121E1. We should put these guys next to each other next time. Okay. Because closer hopefully because it relates. Okay, so we’re going to put those in here and tell of this. Okay. Okay. E 1, 1, 2. Okay. Define US and states at as including. Only for US Territories. Okay. All right, hold on. Territories. Okay, because that’s all they have. United States does not include. All right, let’s see.

United States. Does not include the. That doesn’t include District of Columbia. But state does include this trict of Columbia. Okay, okay. Okay. Here. Neither. Neither U.S. united States or state include the 50. 50 states. Okay. Now I’m going to. I’m going to quote this loss a little bit for. To make sure that it gets it properly. Okay. I’m going to quote state in here. 3121E. Copy. And put that in here. Okay. Okay, let’s see. Here we go. So I’m going to put state definition here. Okay. And then I’m going to put the other one about the United States in here also.

Here we go. United States. Okay, copy that. Put that in there. And I’m going to put on oil taxes. I’m going to put that on there also. Go back up. Oil taxes also as well. Oil taxes are further back up. We were originally to begin with. Oil taxes are. They were pretty up high, I thought, weren’t they? Let’s see. Yeah, here it is. Oil taxes. Okay. Okay. All right, here we go. Yeah, it starts from here and go down to here. There’s oil taxes. Includes a lot of stuff that’s not mentioned. Okay, okay. Here. I’m just going to quote it here.

Okay. Now so how come these two other sections, one of them includes 50 states and the others do not. How do you reconcile. Reconcile these diffuse. Shall we imply that all 50 states and US territories. Okay, hold on, let’s. Okay. And continental shelf and foreign trade zones are also included in these other sections about oil tax. And I’m talking about FICA tax in. Let’s see, 31, 21, EE1 and 2. How about fic? I would have put that in there because I was going to argue about it. You know, how come, you know, you have this stuff and not the other stuff in there? I’m going to put the.

Also do the same thing with the regular income tax. I’m going to correct this thing in a Second that the page 7701. 7701. Hold on. A nine, a nine dash ten. Yeah. Sorry, guys. Thanks for your patience. This subjects a little bit longer to type in because I’m doing this live. I don’t have prepared how AI might respond or not respond. You go here, there, there, there. I gotta be ready as best I can to on the fly give it a question. I’m doing this live because I want you guys to see. I’m not making it up.

This is actually as it happens. Okay, let’s see what it says now. Okay. You have pointed out an excellent textual nuance. The variation between these sections highlights a fundamental mechanic of statutory drafting. Oh, okay. To reconcile these Differences using exclusively U.S. supreme Court principles of statutory construction, we must look at two distinct legal levers. Congress uses the deliberate choice between the verbs means that includes explicit scoping language for the purpose of this chapter subchapter that prevents definition from bleeding into other parts of the tax code. Okay. Here is how US Supreme Court reconciles these sections. Okay.

All right. Supricor decision between means and includes. Okay. The High Court has established a strict operational boundary between definition of the that use the word means and those that use includes. Okay. Okay. So here we go. Oil taxes means the term United States means 50 states and D.C. and everything else. Okay. Okay. Because Congress chose to use means for environmental taxes, the definition becomes a closed loop. If Congress had left out the phrase 50 states, the 50 states would have been legally excluded. Excluded from oil taxes. To capture them under exhaustive means, the mission of Congress had to write them explicitly.

Okay, fine. No problem. Includes enlarging for 3121E. The term state includes DC comma to Puerto Rico. Okay. All right. And Supreme Court ruled, affirmed. Hellbring and later in federal these cases 41 in includes the term of extension or enlargement, not limitation. It prevents ordinary inherent meaning of the base work and CB stack tax on items that might otherwise be done. Well, we’re going to come back maybe later on because I don’t know about that. Case and reconciliation. Reconciliation for fica. Okay. For source key purposes, the ordinary meaning of state is taken for granted. Really? Bias D includes that Congress didn’t need to list the 50 states.

It was simply expanding the operational reach of FICA to also encompass dc. So we’re doing the same thing. Okay. Porga, Guam and America, so on. If Congress had used the means there, it would have accidentally stripped FICA tax liability away from 50 states. Or accidentally. I see. Okay. So Rule on cross pollinization. Okay. All right. Where is that preserving chapters? Your final question asks, shall we imply that all 50 states, U.S. territories and continental shelf and foreign trade zones are also included in Figure 121E and C1A, 9 and 10 on FICA and income tax. That’s what we’re asking.

Third question, right? According to Supreme Court, no, we cannot imply or transfer these specialized pieces across different chapters. The high court relies on a powerful count of construction to Prevent this. Russula versus United States. I know about this case in 83. Where Congress includes a particular language in one section of a statute, but omits it in another section of the same act, is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposefully in the disparate inclusion or exclusion. Okay. Why they cannot be blended now? Strict jurisdictional gates. Congress explicitly prefaced Fair 612 with gatekeeping in phrase for purpose of this subchapter.

Okay. It operates for this subchapter. Fine. Intentional scope. Okay. Congress explicitly wanted condolences, shelf areas and foreign trade zones to be considered part of the United States only for specific purposes of importing and taxing petroleum. Fine. Okay. Prohibition on implication. Under Gould vs Gould, courts are strictly forbidden from extended tax provisions by implications importing the condolent less shelf or foreign trade zones into fica. Or the general definition says someone would violate gold by rewriting the strict boundaries. Congress explicitly look inside separate chapters. Well, in that case, you agree with me. It agrees with me here, but not fully.

It agrees that for fica, you know, right here, the Social Security taxes. Right. You can add the U.S. territories. Well, how about the 50 states? They’re not there either. Okay. All right, so let’s go. We’re going to talk about Gemini a little bit more. Okay. You say since in 20. In. Let’s see, section 3121. Okay. Copy in section 3121. Paste. Okay. E. E. District of Colombia, as you say, is excluded from definition of United States States by purpose. The same logic. Not just D.C. columbia. Also. Continental shelf. Continental shelf and foreign trade zones. Okay. Let’s correct the spelling on these words.

Okay, here we go. States. Okay. Okay. The same logic applies to exclusion of the 50 states in definition of the term United States. In. Okay, here we go. Let’s get those spelling corrections done. All right. United states and section 3121. E. E and section. Section 7701A. Okay. Therefore, 50 states are not included in either sections. I’m going to copy and paste those sections again right now. Guys, put in there in section 3121E and 71A. Okay, copy. Per the principal, in that court case that I mentioned, which I agree with, I’ve had Rusula versus United States, which I’ve actually knew about that case and quoted in my briefs before.

Okay, Paste. Correct. Let’s give it a nice shot. Okay. Let’s go at it. Because it wants to include you, the people, by any excuse, it implied things that are there that are not implied. So first of all, you saw that. The implication rule, it ignored. I tried to say we’re all in doubt, but it didn’t do that. So let’s see. Okay, all right. Okay. All right. Let’s see. Under strict framework of Supreme Court strategy construction, that conclusion is incorrect. While your application of Rusola or Senesca is entirely correct regarding the continental, ship, air and foreign trade zones, the Supreme Court does not allow the Roussilla principle to be used to strip away the core ordinary meaning of the word Congress.

When used, the verb includes. Okay. Okay. They try to say the word includes. Okay. They try to go back to that circle. We are logically incorrect. Okay. Under rousseau low, you’re 100% correct that because Congress explicitly added control of shift areas and foreign trade zones to United States in 4612A4, but admittedly it did in 3120E, they are intentionally excluded from 3121E. Okay. Why? Because condolence shelves and foreign trade deals are extraordinary additions. They are not part of the ordinary default geographic meaning of the United States. Therefore, if Congress wants to tax them, it must explicitly name them.

Omitting them means they’re excluded. Okay. Okay. All right. I’m going to get back to. I think to Gould versus Gould a bit more clearly. Okay? Because I think that’s the one that is kind of ignoring it a little bit too clearly. Okay. In Gould this Gould, the court clearly stated that. Let’s get that exact quotation of Gould versus Gould in here one more time. Clearly. Okay. Okay. Here we go. Let’s put that in there. Okay. Here. Here we go. In the interpretation of statutes and living taxes, it is the established rule not to extend the provisions by implication beyond the clear import of a language used or to enlarge their operations as to embrace matters not specifically pointed out.

Okay? Now. Now I’m going to nail it. Okay? Okay. Okay. You incorrectly. Okay. You correctly implied the 50 states are included in the term United States in. Let’s see. Let’s correct the spelling on these first. Okay. The terms United States estate in section 77018. Okay, okay. When. It is, let’s see, I’m going to use the language of that court case. It is. It is. It is. Not. Not. Let’s see, beyond the clear import of the language used in section 7701A. Okay. All right. Okay. Now I’m going to argue a little bit more about it. Say, furthermore, the court states that, okay, you must not enlarge large.

The operation of tax laws, okay. To embrace or include matters that are not specific pointed out, such as the 50 states, to the definition of the terms of matters. Okay? The terms United States and State, please strictly follow Gould v. Gould. Okay? Section 7701A. No, C. C must be read in harmony with Gould v. Gould. Otherwise it would be unconstitutional. See, that’s the thing, you know, they say, oh, it includes everything else that might be in the definition. Wait, but if you do that, you just violated your civil court decision. And guess what? Congress didn’t do that deliberately.

Okay? They didn’t do that. They kind of got close to it, but they didn’t do that. You know, so they put that word including in there. Kind of confuse you, which is. It works. But bottom line is that if they were to do that and mean that that includes the 50 states, you know, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Island, U.S. territories, trust territory, Pacific Continental Shelf, foreign trade zones, all that, you would make it unconstitutional because specifically doses are not there in fica, nor in the regular definitions of income tax in interrogative code. Okay, let’s go. All right, let’s see.

So otherwise. Okay, so, okay, please correct your error. Okay. All right, let’s see. All right, let’s see what comes up this time now. All right, here we go. Remember, we did two different AIs. We did that. One of them just shut down. Which one was the one that shut down with me with ChatGPT, and the other one that we did, agreed with me at the end. Who was that one that we used? It was Grok. Grok? Yeah. Yeah. GROK seems to be the one that’s more politically incorrect and says stuff, you know, Grok has said stuff.

They were politically incorrect about historical events and they had to fix it and correct it. So it seems to me Grok to be less political AI. But with Meta, I do not understand. But I was once able to convince Meta as well on my cell phone. But I’ll do it for you guys another time. Meta AI as well. Okay? All right. To strictly observe the holding of Gould vs Gould and read it in perfect harmony with 26 USC section of St Oman C. We must look entirely at the clear import of the language used and ensure we do not add, subtract or alter any terms by application.

All right. When we apply this exact rigid standard to text level tendermatic code section IRC their literal language demonstrates why the 50 states are. Are not being written into the text box. Obligation. They are already explicitly written into it. Oh, there you go again. They’re already expressly written into it. And they’re not. Okay. How are they? Okay. I’m going to have to talk about that. Okay. It’s not. Okay. Okay. Harmonize. Okay. All right. It just doesn’t want to go there. Ignore that. Let’s see what it says clearly. Okay. Falun Goo versus Gould. We are forbidden from enlarging or extending the text.

Well, but that’s what you’re doing. We must read the geographic definition of the United States exactly as Congress wrote it. Yeah, here we go. United states include all D.C. applying Gould. That. We must only look at what is specifically pointed out. We see two distinct entities explicitly pointed out by name in this matter. State and states. D.C. okay, fine. The word states are physically present in the text. Therefore, recognizing that states are part of the United States requires zero implication or enlargement Is literal, explicit, definite language of statute. Okay, whatever. Okay. Harmonizing 777. 01A, 10 and C.

Okay. That’s the definition of state versus under Gould. But hold up. But he’s a fraud. Right there. Therefore. Therefore, recognize that states are part of the United States requires zero implication. Yes, it does. It does require implication because it’s not there. The word state does not include the 50 states. It does require implication. Okay, okay. I’m going to argue about that a little bit. Okay. Okay. Okay. So I’m going to argue it. Okay. You say you state that. Is incorrect. 50 states are not listed. Are not listed listed in section 7701A. Okay. It can only be added by implication.

Assuming. However, Gould vs. Gould leaves absolutely no room whatsoever for any kind of implication or assuming. Okay, let’s see. However, Please correct yourself that 50 states. Are not included in definition of states and United States. Okay, hold on. Let me correct my spelling, guys. Here we go. Upstate of the United States. Okay. Therefore, You cannot imply and assume that they are. That the 50 states. The 50 states are included in the terms the United States and State. Let’s see. Let’s see. Let’s see what goes here now. Okay. All right. Please correct yourself. Get. Okay, okay. Where I’m going to add one more thing.

Does the 50 states explicitly appear in the definition of terms United States and state in section 77.01A? So I just, you know, pointed out to him, hello, it’s not there by definition, you know, it’s not there explicitly. How can you assume it? But you’re assuming it. Okay, okay, all right. Okay. Not including essay cannot imply that it’s. Okay, very good. Let’s see. Let’s see if it does. Okay, all right. This one’s taking a bit longer than the other ones, Eddie, but we’re going to go. We’re going to go and insist on its fall on the law.

Gould vs. Gould is a unanimous U.S. supreme Court case in 1917 and it has never been overturned. Still there. And Congress wrote the interrogative nakote with guess what? Understand their well established rule of Google versus Google. There’s no implying, no assuming. When it comes to taxes, it’s got to be explicitly clear there. Otherwise there’s no implying whatsoever. Okay, okay, here we go. Textual clarification says the phrase 50 states or number number 50 states do not explicitly appear anywhere within the text of these sections. Yeah, you are entirely correct on that. Literal textual fact. Yes. Okay. The specific cause I wrote in 709 is the term United States when used in the geographical sense, includes all the states and the D.C.

okay. Applying Gould versus Gould to. States. To adhere strictly to Gould versus Gould, we are forbidden from extending a tax statute provision by implication or enlarging its operation to embrace matters not specifically pointed out. Okay, well, good. Very good. Thank you. Thank you for acknowledging that. Okay. Therefore, we must look exclusively at what is specifically pointed out by literal language of the text and the plural noun, the states. Okay. To determine what states means without assuming or implying anything, the Supreme Court relies on a plain meaning rule. Oh, now it’s going to plain meaning rule. Oh, no, no, no.

See, plain. Now it’s going to plain meaning rule. No, no, plain rule doesn’t apply because Gould vs. Gould, plain meaning rule is what is generally known. We cannot use our definition of what we all think what something means. That’s where it’s going. I don’t know that’s where it’s going. But let’s see. Okay, here we go again. Plain meaning rule. No, there’s no plain meaning rule when you have Congress that specifically define things, especially in tax laws. Okay, okay. The High Court has established that reading a statute word according to standard ordinary definition is not an act of implication or enlargement.

It is simply reading the Text as written. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. This does not apply. Exactly. Okay. So anyhow, so these two cases. Talk about the play meaning rule. We can skip these two. Reconciling the text with prohibitive implication. All right. If you apply Gould vs Gould and refuse to imply any unwritten terms, we must examine literal words. Congress realized. Okay, fine. Specific terms. Congress explicitly pointed out the states. Okay, fine. Inherent definition. Oh, here we go. Inherent definition in American law, United States Code, the ordinary common law meaning of the term states refers to sovereign states that compromise the union.

No, wrong. Okay, wrong. You cannot. There’s no inherent definition. Okay. No enlargement required. No, it is required. Okay. Okay. Interpret the word states to mean that the states of union does not enlarge the operation of the tax code or extended by implication, it is literal baseline definition of the word itself. Which is not the case. Okay. Not the case at all. So what I’m going to do on this one, let me see how much. I think I can go two ways. I can get a bunch of different definitions. Hey, that doesn’t apply. I’m going to give maybe a Supreme Court case that general definitions do not apply.

I think I’m going to go that route. I’m going to give a court case on this very issue of journal definitions. Because I do have it here. Okay, let’s see. Here we go to Statutory Hub, and we got court cases on this stuff. Here we go. Here’s a United States Supreme Court cases. Here we go. Now that’s where the good stuff is. Okay. He will. Okay, okay, okay. Here we go. So here we go. Fox versus Standard Oil Company. Okay. I’m going to add that in there. And also I’m going to add the Department of Agriculture versus Kurtz.

I’m going to add these two super court cases. Okay. Read these two U.S. supreme Court cases that clearly state that the ordinary meaning. Meaning of a term is no replacement for definitions given by Congress. And therefore the plain meaning rule does not apply when Congress. Congress has provided a specific definition to definition of terms. Okay. Let me check my spelling errors. Okay. Correct that. Okay, here we go. Almost done with these. Therefore, we got that the term such as terms United States and state in State, State in section 7701A. All right. Please correct yourself and follow these two court decisions as well as the other U.S.

supreme Court cases I gave you in the most strict interpretation. Yep. Because you gotta follow Supreme Court strictly. Yeah, Just ignore it. Because I want to ignore it. You must. All of us must follow Supreme Court Interpretations correctly. Let’s see what it says now. All right. Okay. Wow. This takes a little bit longer. Plain definition. No, plain definition rule does not apply because Congress gave it a specific definition already. You cannot assume stuff. Ordinary definitions are out the window. Okay, let’s see. Okay, I completely see the textual blueprint you are laying out. If we examine the exact premises of Fox v.

Standard Oil Co. And Stenberg vs. Carhartt, we must agree that statute, definition provided by Congress completely replaces ordinary dignity meaning. And the courts are strictly forbidden from rewriting that glossary. Wow, thank you. Thank you. Finally starting to see the light. You know, we cannot go by assuming. We got to go by the glossary of definitions given by lawmakers. Okay, thank you. AI. Let’s apply that regular standard to the letter. If you’re to completely ignore ordinary admissions. Yes, you should. You have to. And look, only explicit definitions by Congress in the interpreter code. We must apply this rule to every word Congress chose to define in that glossary.

Okay. Yes, correct. When we do this, a strict statute of jigsaw puzzle comes together. Okay, let’s see the cross examination of glossary. Okay. If we strictly follow the Fox of Stenberg, we’re going to look at standard dictionary. To understand what Congress meant, we must look exclusively at 26 USC 7701. Yes, I agree. So far, so good. Man. You’re starting to get there. Maybe. Right. Let’s see. Congress provided definition of state in this section. Yes. The term shall be construed to include B.C. yeah. Nothing else listed there. Under your state interpretation, we cannot guess what the operative verb include means by using an ordinary dictionary.

Ah, there we go. Starting to get there. Stembergs mandates that if Congress explicitly defined that term, we must follow the Congress’s definition to the exclusion of all others. Yes. Correct. Okay. Uh oh, there we go. There goes out the includes. They’re getting thrown at in there. It looks like Congress anticipated this exact structural question and explicitly wrote a mandatory definition for the verbs include and including directly into the very same glossary. Okay, okay. Now Star said okay. Yeah, but say it doesn’t apply. Okay. Section C. The terms included, including, when used in the definition and complaint in this tale, should not be deemed to exclude other meanings, otherwise being the meaning of the term you defined.

Okay, all right. Apply the strict legal syllogism. If we combine Fox, Stenberg and Gould under a strict interpretation, the mathematical logic of the statute unfolds like this Fox and Stenberg mandate. We must completely ignore the ordinary meaning of the word. If Congress has provided clear Definition? Yes. Fifty states are not in definition of the United States or states. You agree right there, right? It’s not there. Okay. The target text. Congress defines state by saying it includes D.C. okay, mandatory tool. Okay. Because Congress used the word includes, then America legally forces us to look at Congress explicit definition includes found in same Asia one.

Oh, no, no, no, no. Okay, but see, now let’s go back to C again. The literal command section says C explicitly. Command as with the word excludes, shall not be deemed to exclude other things. Otherwise be the meaning of the term like 50 states. Okay, so here. Okay, well now it says. Now it says why this perfectly satisfied Gould versus Gould. Let’s see. Okay. The Goulbus goal states that we must not extend tax as by implication or larger operation to embrace matters not specifically pointed out. Yes. If the court rules that 50 states are excluded from a tax code basis of 7:1a910, that court is violating Google versus Gould.

Oh, well, thanks for agreeing. Why? Wait, wait. If the court rules of 50 states are excluded from tax code, quarter is valid in Gold versus Gould. No, it’s not. Let’s see. Why? Because exclusivity states, the court would have to imply that the ward includes means, includes only. But that is what Supreme Court says. By making that implication, the court would be completely erase the explicit language of extremes. Do not use this. Do not use this word by. To imply an exclusion. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. He’s adding stuff in there. Okay, all right, so what I’m going to have to do on this one is to give it other definitions in the determiner code other places.

Okay. Okay, so here we go. Because he doesn’t want to go by that line. Oh, includes. Obviously includes 50 states. Right, obviously includes the 50 states. Okay. All right, then let’s see. Let’s go to definition, general definitions. Okay, let’s go to some of those definitions of state. Do we have more of those definitions? Yeah, let’s see. State is 6103. Okay, we got that. Oil, taxes, immigration. Let’s see, 3002. Let’s see. United States. Okay. All right, let’s see. 3002 means. Okay, let’s see which one would be. I got some of these definitions, guys. A lot of them here that I could use.

Okay, so, okay, I don’t have those sections. I have those sections in my video. I don’t have it here right out of ready to add to it. But basically, let’s go review what has happened here. So basically, what the Gemini does is say that you Know. Do not misuse this word to imply an exclusion. No, that quote does not exist. Okay. Okay. I’m going to argue with that. With it. Your quote of. Does not exist in law. Does not exist in law. Law. In any legal text. In any legal text or court rule or US Civic court, US Supreme Court.

Rul. It violates the. Violates Gould v. Gould explicitly. Please correct yourself. Okay. All right. You’ll see. All right. Let’s see what comes up this time. All right. All right. So. I’m thinking this time I’m gonna have to. I think I’m. Maybe I talk about regulation 1.11. I’m gonna put that in there and see which United States is talking about. I think I’m gonna do that one. Yeah, we got CFR one one one, right? Yeah, we have it up there. I know we have it on there. Yeah, let’s go back. I got. It’s up that. Actually, I can do that.

Yeah. So let’s see. Let’s go in there to. Gemini says you’re entirely correct. Oh, thank you. I know I’m correct. The phrase do not use this word by two plying exclusion is not a verbatim quote from any statutory, Texas or Supreme Court ruling. Yeah, you made it up. It’s hallucinating. It quotes something that doesn’t exist. Why do you quote it? Gemini, if it’s not a quote, why do you quote it? This is example. When they tell you that the AI artificial intelligence sometimes hallucinate, it means they make up stuff on their own because they believe in this, they believe in that.

They believe in this and that and that and that. So based upon that, they made up a quote that doesn’t exist. This is a good example of what they talk about AI Hallucinating. You gotta correct it. Okay, let’s see. Presenting that paraphrase summary in quotation marks was an error on my part. Wow. Admitted that. There you go. See? I apologize for that misinterpretation. I’m correcting it hereby by relying exclusively on the exact literal text of the law and the precise definitions provided by this, you U.S. supreme Court. Okay. Strict analysis under Gould versus Gould. Okay. To adhere with Gould versus Gould, we must strictly look at clear, important language use and ensure we do not extend or conduct the statutes or operations to embrace or exclude matters not specifically pointed out.

Very good. Very good. All right. You get back on your feet again, Gemini, Let us look exclusively at the exact words that are specifically pointed out by Congress. Interim new code. Okay. Very good. Okay. So it talks about United States. Okay. But it includes only DC States and DC Fong Gould versus Gould. We are forbidden from using any implications. Yes. No implications. No implying the literary awards specifically pointed out as being included in the geographic United States are states and this D.C. okay. Talking about a 10 which is defined states. Okay, okay. To determine whether the explicit exclusion of this DC means and the automatic exclusion of 50.

Oh, there you go again. Automatic exclusion in the states you’re excluding. Again, we are forbidden by Gould from making assumption or implication. Instead we must look at specific textual command of Congress. I don’t know. It doesn’t sound like the way when he added the word automatic exclusion. Everything is automatically excluded. Everything. Unless it’s clearly pointed out. That’s what Supreme Court says. You’re ignoring group as a rule. Again. Okay. What is specifically pointed out in 771C. Oh, there we go back to C. Okay, okay. We know what that says about, you know, including simple charity reconciliation. When civic court has been asked to harmonize these exact definitions under strict rules of statute construction, it has uniformly applied literal text says or seek to reject the idea that includes creation exclusive list.

Okay, okay. Gives us synthesis in the United States analyze the definition of IRC stated term includes certain specific entities but omitted others. High Court ruled that omission did not mean excluded. Stating the definition of person in this section does not mention state or any sovereign entity or officer among those includes is equally clear that does not exclude them. Okay. This is made certain by presenting up. I see that terms includes and including are when using the definition are not shall be deemed to exclude other things otherwise with the meaning of that term defined. Okay. And then Groman vs Commissioner 737 Supric.

Distinguish between exclusive and no exclusive definition is ruling that where exclusive definition is intended the word means is employed whereas the word includes includes. The court directly Cites statute representative substance 1C to clarify and includes cannot be used in pled, excuse or other words meaning of the term. Okay. All right. So I’m going to have to just come back to that thing and give it. Can we. I think we can save this. Can’t we. We can save this thing and what we’ll do. Save this search and we’ll do a part two on this. Okay. So I’m gonna have more ready to argue with Jebina on this issue because we gotta get take your question and answers.

Okay. This is taking a long time. So we’ll put this on hold. We can put this on hold, guys. Right? We go to your question answer session and now that I know Where AI is coming from. I’ll have more stuff to correct the Supreme Court. I mean correct the Gemini, I should say, on these interpretations. God. So hang in there. Next week, follow up on Gemini and the law and income tax. All right, so let’s go to your question answers, everybody. Okay? And let’s see, we got several people, by the way, who sent us questions also by.

Could you put a password in here please, by email? I got one person, two, three, four, five people questions. And I will answer your questions at no charge, up to 10 pages. Email, fax or U.S. mail to Freedom Law School. And I’ll answer them for you guys for free here at in here. Okay. In the freedom aisle. So let’s go to the question online first, as we always do, and then the people who’ve questioned us with sending us documents in the mail. Okay. All right, let’s see. Today is the second right, guys, Just second. Right? Okay.

All right, we have a 7700 area code caller followed by a caller from area code 540-Another one from area code 615 77. Auto caller, please give me your first name. How you heard about feet of law school. And then your please, Nelly. Mary. Spell that please. Mary. M A R Y. Oh, Mary. Yes. Mary. Huh. And how’d you hear about us? Yes, yes. Gosh. Maybe Mike Adams. Trying to remember just an interview. Maybe online. And I just been following your interviews ever since. But I want to say Mike Adams. Okay, very good. And how may help you? Yeah, so I just sent in my questions just because I did trying to chip away toward making a decision and finding out how everything might apply to me.

So I’m prepared. But I sent my questions in by email. Oh, you did? Oh, yes, I do have an email here, Mary. Yes, I see. Mary, I got your one page email. Okay, got it. Yeah. And your email starts with letter MT, correct? Correct. All right, here’s her question. I’m a 62 year old widow with perhaps some unusual financial situations. Thank you. All right. And then my only income is from stock market dividends and interest along with Social Security. Does the philosophy of strategies FLS apply to me? It’s not a philosophy. The legal principles in their internal Revenue Code apply to you.

You’re not a citizen or resident of Washington D.C. therefore you are not required to file and pay federally complain taxes. To follow your advice, I’d be protected as a member. Would I need to make some drastic changes since a majority of money is tied to that investment. None at all. Trading banking system? Nope. Fearing the IRS could Seize those assets easily. And I’m not a money manager Stockbroker. No. As a Restore Freedom Plan member, if you choose to join, we 100% protect you. And. And even if they do take your money illegally, we’ll reimburse you out of our funds whatever IRS may have taken from you and make it completely whole.

10,000, $10 million or more. So you have no risk there. Okay. But as a non filer, they cannot just take your money like that. They have to give you a tax proposal officially by certified mail called the notice of deficiency. You can go to tax court trial challenge it. They cannot take your money at all in tax court. And then if you lose after a year or two or whatever time frame and then still later on you have a chance to still possibly modify it. Okay. Or make payment plans or otherwise add the collection of due process hearing.

If you ask for that hearing, they cannot take your money either. You can appeal that to tax court if necessary or court of appeal. So they don’t just take your stuff like that. That’s bunch of baloney. Because you file. When you file a confession form, you say you owe the IRS money. That is how they get the power to just simply take your money. Because you put the rope around your neck and when you sign the 104 income tax confession form and claim under oath that you owe the IRS money, that’s how they just take your stuff like that.

Know nothing about your rights to challenge them as you can by law. Okay. I currently have cash in two banks and I’m accustomed to writing checks. No problem. Keep doing it. Okay? Just keep doing it. Live normal is my current position as treasurer my homeowner association obstacle. No, live your life. All this stuff is in your head, girl. Relax. You good. Been currently in process of funding a universal life insurance policy called Laser fund for purpose of barring against the tax free. The future can help me understand what I would need to consider regarding this policy.

If I choose to become a member and not file, I believe some trust was necessary for it to be created. But I don’t understand and benefit a signature. Have you put any money in this universal life insurance policy yet? How much? I’m sorry, what? Have you put any money into this universal accident? How much? I have. I pay about 30 grand every three months. How long you been doing that for? How long you been doing that? Probably about three years. I’m sorry to tell you this. I used to sell life insurance in my early 20s for about six years.

You were ripped off. Universal life insurance policies are all Scams, rip offs what they do, they’re selling you oil and milk in one package. You don’t know how much you pay for milk or oil because they just combine the price. They’re selling you insurance with savings combined with universal life. Let me tell you how when you get car insurance, if you have no accidents after 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, do you get any of your car interest money back? Mary, do you? No. No. Why? Because insurance is. Anybody pitches them to a fund, one person gets accidents, cracks it or dies, gets the money, the rest get nothing.

You all risk it. That is what life insurance is. Okay, with universal life insurance, whole life cash value life insurances, they rip you off by confusing you by mixing insurance with savings. They say, hey, if you don’t die, you’re going to lose your money, don’t get nothing. Well, that’s what life insurance is. They call that, they give it the name term life insurance. Like, oh, it’s only for length of term. But Sue’s your car insurance, your car insurance is an annual renewable term car insurance for the term of one year. But with life insurance, which is actually a death insurance.

But you the word life to make it sound better. Who wants to talk about death? They give it life is easier to talk about, right? That’s a scam by insurance companies. So. And then they say, oh, but you get your money back. Oh, yeah. Oh, your money earns interest. Oh, yeah. And listen, you can even borrow against your insurance policy, which is a lie. What they did. Mary, how much? The amount of face amount of the life insurance policy you got $30,000 you’re paying every year. How much is that? 200,000. How much is totals? I’ll put in about 600, I think, and then $600,000, right? It’s like 1.

1.2 million, whatever payout upon death. But the point was to just borrow again. I know, I know, I know, I know. I’m telling you, it’s a ripoff. Let me tell you, I got $6,000 life insurance and I’m 63, I’m a year older than you, and my policy is about 450amonth. About roughly about $5,000 a year. That’s called, yeah, that’s real insurance. 5,000. You should be paying 5,000 times two, 10,000 for your $1.2 million of life insurance. Approximately. Right? Oh, guess what, you pay 30,000, 10,000 goes of life insurance. The other 20,000 of your money, it’s your money in your savings account, but now it’s theirs.

And to Take it out. You must borrow your own money back. You’re not borrowing as a life insurance policy, you’re borrowing your own money. They charge you $20,000 extra. That’s not your insurance portion, that’s a savings portion like you put in bank of America or Chase. Okay. And they don’t know this but they charge per session fee. Fees are your savings. Like you put your money in bank of America or Chase. It’s yours, all of it. But life insurance company and the fine princess, they take out 20% of your money up front. Not the insurance. 20% of what I put money.

You took 20% of it upfront. You just keep it bank. Yes, we do. What’s the name of your bank? Well we’re a bank of life insurance company but that’s what they are. They rip you off by taking these fees out and, and it’s in a fine print and then they play this game oh you’re paying you so much interest rate but they took out you 20, 30% upfront. Okay, so they pay you 5%, whatever. Interesting. 8%. You get ripped off from the get go. So don’t even cancel that scam. Get all your money back. Don’t you ever buy this cash value rip off universal life insurance policy which are sold to you.

You know why they’re sold to you? You know why they push it? Because they’re ripping you off. And with that the company makes a lot of money and the insurance agent makes big commissions. Yeah. Where are you seeing the insurance makes those big commissions from by ripping you off of your savings? Confusing. You could visit insurance and savings to together. That’s why the agents want to sell it to you because they make bigger commissions. Which product you think the insurance agent want to sell you? The one he makes $20,000 on or the one that he makes $2,000 on? If you’re the insurance salesman, which one would you sell? The one that gave me $20,000, not the one that gave me only 2,000.

Right. That’s what they done. If the insurance agent is making so much more commissions and ripping you off, guess how much more the insurance company is ripping you off to give so much more to the agent. Got it. So I’m not going to get on that any more than that. Get your money out that’s into that. It doesn’t affect any way taxes anyhow. Doesn’t matter. I just love you and I don’t want anybody to be ripped off. And people get scared scam by the savings type life insurance policies because the agents Want to make more money.

And insurance coming in mind and make more money. And they take advantage of your confusion, your lack of understanding this stuff and math. And they rip you off. So I hate to see that, but sorry. Get all out, okay? And put in gold, silver or bitcoin. We’re getting ready for a crash. Real estate’s gonna crash, stock market will crash. Or we have a lot more. Inflation a lot more. And unemployment will go up slowly like you saw in Jimmy Carter days. You remember. You’re old enough to remember, like me. Jimmy Carter days, we had stagflation. So either way, get gold, silver, bitcoin, safe investment, someone like you.

And don’t be ripped off by these scammers anymore. Ask them, if I were to buy $1.2 million of term life insurance, how much would that cost me? Number two question, agent. How much would your commission be? How much your commission was on this one? Oh, he will not want to answer you. Because if he were to answer you, give you those numbers, he’d be admitting to you he ripped you off. So sorry. If it was your cousin, your neighbor, I don’t know who it was. I don’t care if you love the guy. He was misled to mislead you.

He was misled to believe that by scamming you, he’s doing a good job for you. That’s right. The agents are lied to to lie to you. Just like doctors are lied to to get you get all the vaccines, get the job. Get the corona jab, right? Don’t get the corona, don’t die. But what kills you is not the corona is the jab, the vaccine that kills you. Just like tax returns. What kills you is a tax return that you confess you with the Irish money, right? That’s the problem. When you on the OT 1040 form, you don’t file, you’re free.

You don’t get the corona vaccine, jab bioweapon, you’re free, you’re fine. Same thing goes to the life insurance industry. They all take advantage of our ignorance, my friends. All right. Next thing you ask is originally converted some bitcoin into cash as Fidelity Charitable as a way of donating to charities without tax consequences. Is it okay to go ahead and donate from it this year, even if it still does not fail? Sure. Give your mind to whoever you want to give, Annie. You are free. It is your money. Do as you wish, Mary. After my husband passed, I got help creating a trust.

But I felt I was misled into one size fits all. Irrevocable Trust so recently got approval through the courts, are amended to be revocable. Although I still have not received the filed product. Are you familiar with this? And you know what I would do would do with it going forward if I became a member. Okay, thank you so much. Well, I don’t know enough about your situation. This is an estate planning question. I don’t do estate planning. I know a lot about it, but I’m not an expert at it and I do not do it for a living.

It’s not part of freedom law school offers. But as a Restore Freedom of member, I will refer you to a professional who’s very good at this and he’ll review a situation. He’s a man of integrity. Honesty will do it the way that works for you given what you already have, the limitations that you got in this thing and the court approval that you mentioned and make sure it’s done the way you want and need it for estate planning perfect purposes. It has no relationship with taxes. Don’t worry about it at all. Okay? You protect it anyway under our Restore Freedom no matter what you do.

But what you want to think about basically is you’re 62, I’m 63. Hey, if I go to heaven next day, who do I want everything to go to? Okay, so you set it up so that automatically it goes to those individuals or organizations you love, you know, without having to go through probate, all that kind of stuff. That’s what really matters. So I’m not sure what was done before to see what fixing it is now. So as a member, I’ll refer to somebody who will help you with all this stuff. Okay. Any other questions? Mary, you’re good.

Okay. Yes. The only question is, is this recorded so that I can come back and share it with my daughter or daughters? Yes, if I want them to hear your answer, yes, this is recorded, you can right away listen to it again on our YouTube channel, Rumble Channel, Odyssey channel, Bitchu Channel, Facebook. It’s all there. Just, you know, what time is it right now, guys? We’ve been into this, what, an hour and a half? Yeah, but so just forward over. I took it an hour to finish my presentation. So after one hour of my presentation, your question is next.

Go listen to that and you can forward it to this point. Part of our life and trust and life insurance if you want to. Okay. Okay, thank you. Thank you very much. You’re welcome. My pleasure. Mary, thank you for calling. Hun, let’s go to 5450. Let’s see, I get 504 area could call. Sorry, I said it wrong. 504A could call. Are you alive? Give me your first name, my friend. I heard about Freedom Law School. Then your question please. Can you hear me? Yes. Hello? Okay, my name is Don. How you doing? Good. I heard about you maybe about four, four and a half years ago I started watching you online and then I got connected to your videos.

So I’ve been faithfully watching them and listening to probably every, every Tuesday I try to get on this and, and listen up. And I stopped paying taxes back in 23. Followed all your steps and with no problem. I didn’t have any issues with my company putting my exempt form. But just, just last the beginning of March I got the, the IRS notice. And I know I’m not a taxpayer and some of these notices you say to ignore, but the first one was a CP59 and then the second one was a CP518. And I just wanted to make sure that I didn’t have to worry about replying to them because I.

I’m not filling out the 1040 form. Okay, those numbers, I don’t remember. I don’t know what those letters mean. Maybe I did. What’s the number? CP59 and what else? The first one was the CP59 and in the second one a month later was the CP518. Oh yeah, those are as you see in this chart. Thank you guys. Got a good chart. Helpful. You got the record numbers on that? Remember, I’m either. Those are simple dumb computer generated letters asking you to file a 1040 income tax confession form. They are not signed by anybody, no name of nobody.

There’s nobody watching you. They’re sent out in mass by tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of millions at a time. There’s no one out there at the IRS sending this letter to you and waiting for Don to respond and say, okay, Don, then respond. Let’s go get Don. Don, I’m going to come and get you. You don’t respond to our letters. You ignored us. You didn’t file. I’m going to come and get you and nail you, brother. No. It’s a simple junk letter. There’s no law requiring address to send it to you, but they do.

Too scary to be a slave. You can just ignore it. You’d be just fine. Go on with your life on your own. Or you want to join Restore, but you’re fine. Anything else? Nope, that’s it. I just wanted to make sure because like I said, I haven’t paid taxes and I’M not. And, you know, this was the first letter I got, so I just wanted to get clarity on it, but that’s all I needed. Thank you. You owe. Welcome. Thank you for calling. All right, let’s go to our next call from area code. Let’s see, 7, 7, 0.

Okay, and then we got another caller after that caller from area code 254. So 770 area code. Caller, please give me your first name. I heard about Freedom Law School. And then your question, please. Are you there, 7, 7, 0 area. Could call her. That was me, too. I’m sorry. Peymon, this is Mary. You already answered. Oh, yeah, that’s right. We got. That’s right, we do. Okay, let’s go. 2, 5, 4, you could call her then. All right, 2, 5, 4, 8. Could call you alive with Freedom Law School. Give me your first name, how you heard about Freedom Law School.

And then your question, please. Hey, Payman, it’s Charlie again calling in just to listen to the good information you’re putting out. I heard from you originally on pill.net on the Rambo and Friends podcast and learning as much as I can and studying up on this tax code stuff, and, boy, it’s amazing. Nobody wants to believe it, but the proof is right there on paper. So I’m going to keep following along with your advice. And thankfully, I don’t have to file. I’m under disability, so. But I’m just trying to help others to become more aware of, you know, what’s really going on and not get fooled into these fear tactics that these.

These creatures try to impose on us. Yeah, these creatures, these are your public servants who are out of control, who see you with contempt. They see you as a dumb, ignorant sheep to be sheared like a sheep. And so they make you afraid through a. Keeping you ignorant. How even these lawyers, these tax lawyers, and even these accountants, how they’re so indoctrinated to the follow the IRS tax code and not the actual law and use their brain cells that they have to figure out how definitions and legal jargon is so misinterpreted. Mm. Ridiculous. Yep. Yep. Well, thank you, my friend, for calling.

I appreciate you. Okay, with our next caller. If there is a caller call right now, the board is open the number to calls 424-552-1299 and then press 1 on your telephone keypad. Dial 424-552-1299 if you have a question and press 1 on your telephone keypad. You’ll be next. Right now, I’m going to Go to some more. We do have a caller right now from area code 406 just joined us. You are live, my friend. Give me your first name. I heard about FETA Law School and then. Your question please. My name is Jeremy and I ran across some advertisement of yours some time ago, dismissed it, and then saw you again on X and started following you.

My question is. So I have filled out the, the forms for my congressman and I sent off the first ones for income tax. I think the advice was to wait a period of time between sending each of the three. So I’m going to do that. And I also have the W4 with the addendum and all that ready to send to my employer because they have one of those HRIS systems where you have to log in and immediately, you know, click a button to say that you’re, you’re exempt before actually getting into W form. So it’s all handled electronically.

My, my fear is that if I send that paper W4 with the addendum on it that either a, they’re going to reject it immediately. No, no, stop, stop. No, no, stop, stop. Don’t go further. No, no, no, no, no. You’re assuming that, okay, there are not a reason rejected. When your letter goes to the human resource or payroll division of your company, you assuming someone with high level of legal experience or knowledge is going to read it and say, I’m not sure about this, I think I’m going to reject it. That’s not the way it works.

The way it works is some clerk, usually a young female, gets that and puts it in your file because that is their job. They don’t have the time nor interest to read your letter. You think they have nothing better to do? Then try to read and understand your, your legal documents. Do you have for fun on the side read legal documents? Is that what you do? No, you don’t. Neither do they not. So they’re not gonna reject that. They go, take it, put in your file. Okay? That’s the end of it. My next, my, my next apprehension is getting that lock in letter from the IRS and how to handle that.

I’m currently considering applying to become a member of Freedom Law School. And would that be advisable to do before turning in that, that paper? W4, look, the locking letter. We’re going to be filing a lawsuit about that. We’d be working on it against the irs and I’m sorry, the problem is the employers in addition to the irs. The problem is employers are ignorant and afraid of the irs. They don’t have to do what the IRS says at all but they do it because they don’t care about you and they’re ignorant and afraid. So that risk exists.

So there’s nothing I can tell you further about that because I’m not going to lie to you. I’m going to try do anything or say anything untrue to have you become a registered Freedom Plan member. All I can tell you is that does not happen to most people. Most of our members who are employees don’t have that problem. They don’t I’d say better than I’m down to get percent maybe 95% something like that don’t have that problem. So but I cannot tell you it won’t happen at all to you because I’ll be lying and I can’t lie to you or anybody so that that’s just a chance that exists.

So at the end you have to decide how you resolve that because not a pure black and white hey easy answer as I wish it would be for you. Okay. Anything else? Yeah. Then my next drop back would be to request for them to become a 1099 employee and then try to navigate those waters. That would I’ve been with that company for 15 years independent contractor will solve that whole at all potential locking that problem anyhow that would be definitely the wiser way easy safely to go and work on that as much as you can. Okay okay.

All right Jeremy, thank you. I appreciate your time. You’re welcome my friend than thank you for your good question. I appreciate you. All right we have I think one more call right now from area code 352352 area code caller please give me your first name how you heard about Freedom Law School. And then your question please. Are you there? There you go. Three five theory could call her. Okay one more try. Three five theory could call her. Speak now or we’re going to go to the next caller my friend. Okay he’s not answering so we’re going to go to the next caller who just joined us from area code 93937 area code caller, please give me your first name.

I heard about Freedom Law School. And then your question please. Yes, my name is George and I heard about you. I’ve been following you and I appreciate everything you’re teaching us. My question is regarding I haven’t tried the last two years the 24 and 25. My question is regarding the passport. I’ve heard on different shows where sometimes the State Department will pull someone’s passport. When does that happen or does that happen to everybody? First of all, how did you hear about us? You said, George, I’ve been following you. I’ve heard a lot of your interviews recently with Lara Logan, with Matt Gates, with.

I’ve been, I’ve used the petitions to send to my congressman. I’ve actually sent them two years in a row, never heard a peep back. So. Yep, yep, yep, gotcha. All right. Primarily I’ve been, yeah, I know about three in law school. I’ve used your website. I follow you regularly. All right, my friend. So what about the passport denial? Basically what that is, if you the IRS about $60,000 or more for whatever reason, usually it’s filers, then the IRS can tell the US State Department to not renew your passport or not give you a new passport if you want to get or reapply.

That’s all it is, you know, and IRS cannot just, we don’t file, just do that. Deny a passport. It’s not automatic. You have the right in America, the land of the free, the home of brave right to a trial. Yes, it’s called due process of law. You have a right to trial. America is not a third world dictatorship. Communists, they just take your stuff. It’s not like that. They take your stuff because you don’t challenge them as you could by law in US Tax court. Okay? So that doesn’t happen willy nilly. You know, they have to give you a tax proposal by certified mail.

They got the mail, it’s your last loan address and then you have the right to challenge it in US tax court. That might take 12 years or longer to, to get through. You can appeal it to court of appeal, then to collect after give you a collection of due process hearing. And that hearing that you get, if you don’t want the result of that, you can appeal that to tax court and appeal and then again to US Tax to court of appeal. And then after all these processes, after all these years gone by, they can now initiate if they want want to take your passport away or attack your paycheck, things like that, otherwise you’re fine for many, many years at the worst case scenario.

If you exercise your rights and challenge them like I do, like our Restore Freedom Plan members do, because Freedom Law School takes care of them for all these things. All right? So do not worry about those. What else is on your mind, my friends? So basically, basically if I as long as I go through the exercise my rights, take them basically go to court and then basically it’s, it’s the appeal process and everything and then they may. But they cannot take the passport right away. Basically correct. Okay. Okay. I appreciate it. Thank you. You’re welcome, my friend.

All right. The 2548 could call her. We went to him one time, didn’t we? He wasn’t there. Huh. Okay, so he wasn’t there. Was that 35254 he could call her. Let’s try one more time. 254 area could call her. Looks like you’re waiting to get your question answered. If you have a question, go ahead and ask it now. Otherwise we’re going to go to more questions. People have emailed us. It’s Charlie again. Just still listening to all the good stuff that you’re putting out. No questions this time, my friend. No question. Okay. All right, thank you.

You’re good then. So let’s go now. We have your. Thank you, Charlie. Let’s go to the more people that sent us these letters in the mail to address. We have a question online. Let’s go. The online question. 353. I just took him right now. He was three five two the current. We just took him right now. 353. Good caller. All right, so Priscilla says online, I’ve been watching your videos. I find them to be very informative. I work with Sherry Peel Jackson for business development and when we got to the tax section she said everyone must pay their taxes.

To my knowledge, both of you are savvy in your work, including taxes. Can you please clear up this misunderstanding? Thanks. Okay, well, here’s the thing. A lot of people in the tax truth movement I’ve known since 1990s and some of them listened to me and did things right and they won. Like Drew Bannister, the former IRS special agent. Okay, I’ll show. Yes. So he did things right and when the IRS tried to come after him, okay, he beat the irs. Okay. And you see his victory is right here. This on our step five. This is Joe Bannister, former gun carrying special agents, student of Freedom law School since 1997.

When Joe Barrinster came out, other agents came out also Sherrod Jackson and John Turner. And what happened. Here’s more pictures of Joe Bannister. By the way, I published his book. On his right hand side, you see the blue cover book? That’s his book. And he was interviewed by Marty Sheller Greene. Also, I try to help guide other people to do the right things like Sherry Peel Jackson. And unfortunately she declined my invitation. I did annual Freedom Leadership conferences with Joe Bannister, other top leaders, attorneys, paralegals researchers, the movement got together on my invitation to get together like America’s founding fathers and learn and cooperate and work with each other.

And unfortunately, several of these people, including Sherry Jackson, refused my invitation and did not participate. Joe Baronser was there very consistently and he learned from me and others, each other’s successes and mistakes of those in the past. So unfortunately, Sherry, when she was tried and she went to trial about a year or two after Joe Banished was tried, right? Joe Manson was acquitted. Cheryl Peel Jackson was convicted. And unfortunately, she went the wrong way. Didn’t do the stuff, her homework, as she could have if she had worked with me. And I knew all the other top guys.

It wasn’t just me. I knew all the top guys to help her, to educate her. It wasn’t just me. The guys older than me, more experienced than me, like Sean o’, Connor, Deborah T. I was learning from Shawna Carter passed away now years ago. So she was already. And she was convicted. And then she made a worse choice, unfortunately, of telling the judge in writing that the judge has no jurisdiction over her. Well, the judge obviously did have jurisdiction over her, and he took advantage of that and gave her maximum sentence, four years in prison for four.

Okay. That’s all he could give her. Okay. And so because she wasn’t prepared, because she’s not doing homework and worked with me and other people, because she wanted to be a lone wolf on her own, unfortunately, she lost. And then this is typical, when people go after. We go after wrong, baseless legal theories, they lose. Then tell you, oh, it doesn’t work. I tried. It didn’t work. So if I couldn’t do it, neither can you. Because otherwise, if I couldn’t do it and you did it, then that means that you’re smarter than me. You do something better than me.

I’m not as intelligent as you, and I cannot accept that. That hurts my ego. That happened with me and several other people. I’m not going to name other ones because I don’t need to, but I have to address her because she said that to you and you asked me about it. Otherwise, I don’t talk about it usually. Okay? There’s a lot of baseless legal theories out there that people follow and that gets people in trouble. And because people don’t want to look up the law. I tell you, look at the law. I rely on the law.

The interrogna code, the U.S. supreme Court cases, U.S. treasury regulations, not some cock and baby theories like revocation of election. I’m a U.S. national, not a U.S. citizen. I’m a state citizen, sovereign citizen. UCC Uniform Commercial Code. Arguments, name it all, capital letters, Common law arguments versus admiralty, Yellow fridge flag arguments and so forth and so on. Okay? I’ve been at this for 34 years. I was a young man of 29. All his hair was completely jet black. I started back in 92, never been to prison. And Harrison has known of me since 94. And way back then, they were looking at me as a potential fraudulent tax protest promoter.

Never been to prison, never paid him a dime. We’ve been in court, okay? And I beat him. Also in court. I beat him my Irish Appeals office. I beat him in the US Tax Court and I beat him in US Federal District Court as well. So I’m sorry, she didn’t choose to do that. In fact, to this day, I’ve asked Sherry to work with me. Refer people to me. I’ll pay her. She declines. What can I do? How can I make people to work with each other? Founding Fathers of America, what do they do? They decided to work together despite all the differences that they had with each other.

Right? But unfortunately, too much. In America, people are a lone wolf. They don’t work together. I know it all by myself. I’m good enough. I don’t need to work with other people. That’s not what the Founding Fathers did. They worked together to restore freedom in the colonies and created this great United States. They even poured the blood on the line together. Here we can restore freedom without pouring any blood. No violence at all. All you gotta do is agree to work together. And don’t think you have it all figured out. Okay? Enjoy and restore freedom plan, guys.

Back in the early 90s, so many people do all this patron mythology and nonsense and get in trouble. It doesn’t work. I didn’t do that. I went to the law library and looked up the law for myself. And I looked for the people that are smarter than me, better than me, to learn from them. I learned a lot of things from different people, like Ervin Schiff and his mistakes, too, and successes. Sean o’, Connor, Judge Bill Drexler, Otto Skinner, you know, Bill Conklin, Vern Holland, a lot of people that passed away. Robert Clarkson. Okay. John Cottmeyer.

Okay. That was my attitude. That’s how I get to be successful. Because I remain humble. When I was young and I didn’t know Jack, and I remained humble. And I still am humble. If someone gets better than me, can teach me something new, I’d love it. Please make me better. Please help me Improve. I want to get better. If it’s your idea, I’ll accept. Doesn’t have to be my idea. But some people have this ego that if it’s not their idea, they don’t want to do it. If it’s your idea, they don’t want to do it.

You know, if they couldn’t do it, then you cannot be any smarter. So hope that gives you a better perspective on the situation. That’s why I tell people do not believe the government, anybody out there or me. Follow the law. And that’s why we give you a free law school. Step one, we start you up to be free is follow the law. As found on US government’s official legal websites. 10:20 form and instructions, US treasury regulations, laws published by US Congress and US Supreme Court and the Constitution. That is it. Highest direct sources of law from the government’s own mouth.

And that’s how you win. That’s how they leave you alone. Like me, they don’t try to indict me, put me in jail for not filing income tax because I’m not required to. I’m not a citizen or resident of Washington D.C. i’m not required to file income tax. Neither are most of you. Okay. All right, let’s go to the next question. We have on paper we got a letter from Kelly in Texas who’s a long term payment plan with the IRS. $517 a month, 10th of each month automatically comes out of her account and tells her that Kelly has $18,500 in change balance for year 2020.

Okay, well that’s all it is to it. You want to continue paying them, you can. If you want to stop, you can stop. It’s up to you. I mean there’s nothing I can do to get you out of this thing because these 99% of the time that I get these letters, the person like Kelly has filed a 104 income tax confession form confessing to all the IRS money. And I’m not a magician to get you out of the confession that you signed on that 1048 form claiming that you owe the IRS money. That’s how you ended up owing the IRS all this money, that now you make a payment plan.

So all you can do is stop. Stop filing and paying income tax. Stop signing a 10 for income tax confession form under penalties of perjury claim that you owe the IRS money on line 37. Don’t do it again. Okay? Your accountant, your CPA tax attorney deceived you, lied to you, didn’t tell you what under penalty perjury on the 1040 that you signed means. Okay. So that’s my best advice for you, Kelly. Hope that helps out. You know, of course. Call me. Okay. Now, I’ve got a question online. Somebody Jessica says will Peymon share his thoughts on Florida property tax elimination proposal? I haven’t kept up with that.

All I know about that is that their proposals that will be on a ballot pretty soon to eliminate property tax completely for Floridians. That’s what I understand. I think it’s all good. Vote for it. Heck, Florida is already most free state in America by far. No state income tax. One of the eight states would like that. And eliminating income tax for Florida Indians in their primary home. That’s great. Go for it. Move to Florida for that reason. That’s why I did. Freedom is great. California is losing people. New York is losing people. Illinois is losing people because they’re socialists.

You’re not free. You’re taxed to death as a slave slave. Florida, Tennessee, New Hampshire, the freer states. Hey, people are going to them. These free states. All right, let’s see. Do you have any questions online right now? I think we have some callers joining in there with a call from area code 602 joined us, followed by caller from area code 4, 2, 3. Okay, 6:02 area code. Caller, please give me your first name, how you heard about Freedom Law School. And then your question, please. Hey, my name is Kale. I found you, I believe on Tick Tock a year or two ago.

Oh, wow. Before Kick Tock keeps kicking us out. All right, Ken, I know Kick does keep ticking, kicking us off. We ought to get back on TikTok. Maybe we could try it. It’s different ownership. No, you already give it a try. You know, it was Chinese owned now. Now it’s Israeli Zionist owned. You know, we cannot criticize Israel, I guess out there, but we can talk about income taxes. Chinese didn’t want us to not talk about taxes for some reason on Tick Tock. I don’t know why, you know, but anyhow. Ken, right? Is that your name? K, E, N, correct? No.

Ko. How do you spell D? A, Y, L, E. Kale. Okay. All right. Kale. How may help you, my friend? Yeah, so my question is I haven’t filed since 2019 and I. I had to file last year because I filed bankruptcy. And I just was just curious what my steps are just to prevent any action from the irs. Like what’s the first step? You said you filed for last year. What year are you referring To. And why did you file a 1040 confession trap form after years? I’m not filing those confession forms. What happened? Why did I file? I.

I filed taxes for the year 25 because I had filed bankruptcy in 25, and the bankruptcy attorney, our trustee, I guess, told me I had to. Okay, I’m sorry he did that for you? Did a bankruptcy go through? Yeah. It was just yours? Yes. Chapter seven. Okay. All right. So what’s your question now? So what’s the steps for the first step going forward in the future here to prevent any action from the IRS on me? Well, from all these years that didn’t file. Well, four years you didn’t file. I don’t know, because you weakened your case yourself, you can join 4 years, 20, 21 forward, I’ll protect you, civilization 100% for money, IRS coming after you.

But criminally, you just weaken your case. It’s not worst, but you weaken your case by filing a 1004 income tax confession form. Now, if it was done because your attorney said that to be able to bankrupt in chapter seven, you have to do that. So that gives you an excuse, but it does weaken you a little bit. So you can restore freedom. Join a Restore Freedom Plan and I’ll protect you 100% from IRS taking your money criminally. Also, I just want you to know your criminal case is a little weak because you did file that 1040 income tax confession form for 2025, even though your attorney told you you have to do that to be going bankrupt, to be able to bankrupt what you owed.

So you can join Restore Freedom Plan on our website. There it is. Information there. Sign up form is on the top center. Click on that, agree to your terms and fill out the application. So it’s easy to do. Call us at 813-44-44-800 if you have any questions. We’ll. We’ll help you with that. Answer your questions further. Anything else? Kl okay, sounds good. Yes, sir. All right. Thank you for calling, my friend. Let’s go to four two three, Erica. Caller, you’re live with Freedom Law School, my friend. What is your name? How you heard about us and then your question, please.

Hello, my name is Scott. Can you hear me okay? Yes, Scott. Okay, thank you very much for taking my call. I tried to call earlier on my 352 number and I was an idiot and I had my microphone muted. So that’s my fault. I apologize for that. No problem. No problem. That’s okay. Well, how’d you hear about us? Bobby? Scott. Okay, thank You. I heard about you through a friend of mine back in 2017, and I don’t know for sure how he heard about you, but I think it was probably YouTube. I don’t know if you were doing YouTube for sure at that time or not, but my friend recommended that I look into your company and your services.

And so I’m very grateful that. That I had that information. I haven’t filed taxes since 2017. My wife and I used to file jointly confession forms when we were deceived by the IRS and others. And in the past. So we’ve been awakened, as far as I know and appreciate you helping with that. I mailed off the petition forms back in 2022. I don’t know why it took me so long to mail those off. I had a disconnect in my understanding, I believe. But I mailed that off for my wife and for myself to my three congressmen here in the state of Tennessee.

And I recently, I was checking my records and I realized I only had received the certified delivery receipts from two congressmen. So I want, if you would help me understand, should I take the action to mail that out again for my wife and myself, that petition to that one congressman. And this. I have a second question as well. Hold on. One other time. Hold on, hold on. Yeah. You did petitions already to Congressman. Why do you feel that may be a need to do the petitions again? Because I did not receive a certified, certified mail receipt back from that congressman.

You don’t need that. I don’t know how. You don’t need that. You don’t need that. The certified mail slip that you have that you mailed it out to him on that date is enough. That green and white slip you got, that’s enough. When did you mail out to him back in 2022. The fact they mailed it out is good enough. Yeah, it was December 22, 2022. Yeah, that’s fine. You have the proof of mailing to him. Certified mail is presumed to have been received because you did mail it out. So it’s presumed to have gotten there.

They then respond to you. That’s good enough. You don’t need to have the return receipt back. That’s not necessary. Right. I have the. I have the green and white and it is still stamped by the post office. So you’re good. Certified that I mailed it. Yes. You’re good, Scott. And of course, I kept cop. Okay, thank you. And thank you for your advice on that. I have one more question, if I may ask that, ma’. Am. What’s your other question? May I ask a second question, please? Yes. Thank you. Yes, I’m sorry for the it might be a delay here on my line.

I’m sorry about that. I intend to sell my property, which is approximate value between 5 and 600,000. And I don’t know exactly what I need to do about that, but I don’t want the IRS to bother me about capital gains taxes. So I think I heard you on a YouTube channel or YouTube series or whatever post recorded that, that one that you posted that talked about telling giving some kind of a form to the closing agent where that they would request that they did not send in an input to the IRS about that closing. Correct. And would you, would you speak about that again? Sure.

A little bit more detail for myself. First of all, is this your primary home? You’re ready to live your primary house residence? Yes, sir, it is. And guess what, guess what, Even though the IRS sees it, let me help you. The first $250,000 gained from sale of your primary residence or home is by the IRS’s interpretation is exempt anyhow from any taxes. So between you and your wife, $500,000 is exempt. So yes, sir, you’re below that anyhow. Now, what we do for people like you who if you join our Restore Freedom plan and when you open an escrow title closing process with the buyer that you got, you let us know at the you get the copy of the paperwork for closing of the sale from the title or escrow company to us and we make sure we write to them to follow the law as provided, not what they’ve been misled by their lawyers to be treating you as you have a property in the District of Columbia or you have stuff going on D.C.

yeah, you know all that stuff and withhold income tax or report 1099 about you to the IRS. So we’ll do that for you as a Restore Freedom Time members. So join right now for 2025 and when you sell the property in 2026, they will do that for 2026. Maintain your membership for 26 forward and you’ll be protected from anything from sale of the house or your wages or your business income commissions, bank interest, dividends, stocks, bonds, crypto, real estate rentals, doesn’t matter. It’s all covered because you are not financial from the country of the District of Columbia.

You have no money coming from the District of Columbia to you either. So you don’t owe any income tax whatsoever to the irs. Okay? Yes, sir. Thank you. You’re welcome. Thank you for your good question. Yes, I have one more. Yes, sir. Go. I’m sorry, I failed to recall that I had one more question. So after I sell my home, I’m planning to move to the country of Panama. And my wife and I and I wondered what kinds of things would you generally recommend I take into account with that move from a financial standpoint where that I don’t.

That would avoid me triggering any unnecessary IRS trouble if any additional action. There is none. There is none. If you want to go, you can go. But how I high recommend this. More than half of the people who leave America to be free in Thailand, Panama, Costa Rica, these countries, I think they come back eventually after maybe two thirds of them come back to USA because they found they’re kind of trapped in only the tourist areas of the country. They’re not free to go where they want to go completely, necessarily. And it’s a small country. They don’t have the culture, they don’t know the people.

They’re stuck with the expat community areas. And so the better alternative, in my opinion is you go live in a countryside, a Florida or Tennessee or Texas or a state, no state income tax state. Since you like that kind of warm weather, Florida would be ideal for you. You can go to the rural area of Florida and get the low cost of living that you’re looking for by moving over there. Okay. And at the same time be free with Americans and that, you know, if you want to go someplace different, you can. Does that help you with that question, Scott? Oh, it does.

Thank you very much. I appreciate your counsel. Actually, I used to live in Florida for 25 years. Years. Where? And where. That’s when I was where I. I moved to the Tampa area initially. Where. And I lived in a couple of other locations. Where? What city? Tampa, Florida. Yeah. So you want a city, you lived in a city. Cities cost more to live. Land is expensive in city and the country is cheaper. That’s why I don’t live in Tampa other than Brooksville, about 40 minutes north of Tampa in a country suburb on 7 acres. If I want to get 7 acres in the city would be very expensive.

I lived in California. I moved out of Orange County, California in suburb of la to the countryside of feeling by Victorville on the way to Vegas, on the other side of the mountains, an hour from downtown la, toward Vegas in a dry desert with rocks. Okay. Because it was countryside, it was cheaper to have three acres of land for my children to play around with. So you were not living in a country Area you did go move the country. The more away you are from city and all the conveniences, the less the housing and everything will cost for you.

So anyhow, that’s my suggestion. You can go to Panama if you want. But I want you to know the reality that most exp. Patriots eventually come back to America. So think twice about that before you leave the country that you’re very familiar with. Any other questions, Scott? Yes, sir. Thank you very much. You’re welcome. No, sir, that’s. That’s very good. And thank you for your advice. I really appreciate it. I’ll take it into serious consideration. You got it, my friend. Thank you for calling. Let’s see, we have question online. You want to go to online? Someone says, did Peter Schiff’s father fill out a 10 for Urban Schiff? Peter Schiff’s father, who was a friend of mine from late 1990s, but I met him in 1996 for the first time.

97. And I knew him until 2006 when he went to prison. And I met Peter Schiff back in the year 2000 in Los Angeles in one of his father’s seminars. Anyhow, Urban Schiff had not filed tax return for a long, long, long time. Since late 70s. However, in early 2000 years discovery, he discovered it by someone telling him that hey, if you put a zero on your 10 for your tax form and you have withholding from your paycheck by your employer, you can get that withholding money back. So he did that himself and. And told other people to do the same.

Okay. So he did file zero returns, not regular returns. He filed tax returns showing zero income, zero taxes due to the irs. So hope that answers your question. Okay. All right, let’s go to the Colorado 99 from area code 615. Area code. Please give me your first name. I heard about Freedom Law School. And then your question, please. Right there. There you go. 615 caller, one more try. 615 area. Could call you alive if you are here with us. Hello? Hello? I’m so sorry. Are you talking to me? Are you talking to me, please? Yes. What’s your name? Me? Oh, I’m so sorry.

I called in to listen because I always learned something. Oh, yeah, okay. No problem. Came on or. No problem. My name is Sherry. It’s all you have. Any questions? Mary, are you good? You and what you do. I so respect you. And I just. I just know that you are a walking encyclopedia of truth about what we need to do. Thank you. And so I call in and listen. Thank you and I just have so much respect for you. Thank you. And please know that I didn’t have a question, but I was just being a part of it and learning.

Thank you. And. Oh, let me ask you. I’ve gone on and I started listening and learning from your sessions, one through, I think five, and then others. On your side is. I haven’t read anything yet about joining any group with you. Is there a group to join? Is there a charge? Bring me up to speed on that, will you please? Well, the step six of our Restore Freedom Plan is of our seven steps to be. Be free of the ashes. That Restore Freedom Plan, you can join a Restore Freedom Plan. It’s modeled after America’s founding fathers.

All for one, one for all. We all join together, we all pitch in. We all contribute to protection of each and every one of us, all collectively, we’re doing the same thing as them. However, it can be done all peacefully without resorting to bloodshed. Okay, so that’s what it’s about. The membership is 30% of what you otherwise would have paid the IRS. The minimum membership is only $2,000 per year. You must maintain your membership because you divorce the corrupt King George of England, the Washington D.C. swamp of criminality, and you contribute to Founding Fathers of America, George Washington and company of today, and align yourself with that them because you already aligned with this movement and with us anyways.

So this way you completely protected from any Irish attacks. I’m sorry. Yeah, I hadn’t gotten to 6 yet, but I was going through. And I was going through YouTube and I was learning various other things and I was. Had just started that and I had to leave. My daughter has been sick. I won’t go into that, but it’s taken up my time a couple of weeks and so I. I’m only on Social Security. Every investment that I had was lost during the 2000 downturn. It was gobbled up, you know, it just didn’t disappear. It just changed his hands.

So I don’t have that kind of money to join. Don’t join. You don’t need to join us at all, Mary. You don’t need to join us at all. If you can leave it on Social Security alone. IRS will not come after you anyhow because according to them, Social Security alone is non taxable anyhow. So you don’t need to join at all. I’m going to be honest with you, and I hope that you’ll make it where no one can hear me. Will you make it where no one can hear what I’M hearing. Everybody can hear you in a public area.

Area. They don’t know your full name or your full number. It’s private. It’s a public format. That’s okay. You just married. What’s your question? I haven’t been paying my taxes since the 90s. Okay? So what? I. I got mad because of certain things, okay? And I’m not going to go into all of that, but I haven’t paid taxes since the 90s. Good for you. I just. I got fed up and. And I was very upset with what happened. I got no help with what happened. And a trust fund that my husband left us was eaten up by the national bank, was given to another member of his family illegally.

Our money was stolen. They did all sorts of things. I tried to fight them. I didn’t. I fought them. I didn’t try. I fought them and stood up to them. And I got no help from my government, from my state or. Or federal government. And there’s about 18 million in that trust. Wow. And I have been viciously angry ever since because I figured it out. It’s all lies. They have been lying to me and, and to my family since they came into this country. Sometime in the late 1600s is when my family started coming in. I’m part Cherokee Indian, which means nothing in this country.

And I have many bloods, but I am a true American. And I got no help whatsoever. I was shunned and pushed out and lost all of it. And my babies grew up without the advantages that that could have brought and the wealth that could have come from it for them. And I’ve just been furious ever since. Let me suggest a course of action without bloodshed. I’m going to tell you, I don’t know that we can do this without bloodshed. Yes, we can. Okay. They are vicious. No, no, Mary. We are not exercising our rights. We’ve been trained to be ignorant of the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, our system of government and laws.

And they take advantage of our ignorance. Why is it after 34 years I’m not imprisoned for not filing income taxes? Because they know I know the law better than them. While I was in tax court back in2011, I remember the lawyer. My opponent was Sebastian Vaught, a nice guy, actually one of the most decent government workers I’ve come across. And he told me because we had to talk about preparing our case for the Tax Court. He told me pay him on every time he got on the phone. You teach me something new. Here’s the guy from a lawyer.

How come I. I’m not a lawyer. Never went to law school. He did. He went to law school. I’m teaching them about law because I took the time to educate myself. And so can you. Every one of you can educate yourself by going to our website, freedomlawschool.org okay? And what you can do, Mary, is take action. Violence is going to be perfect excuse for them to shoot you down, put you in prison and then blast it all over that with a bunch of crazies. And you got to stop the craziest, okay? That’s the last thing you want to do to fall into that trap, okay? That’s why they set up January 6ers, right? They deliberately threw stuff at them in a tear gas to agitate them and beat them up.

They deliberately did that deliberately. The whole thing was done. So they can then charge him with insurrection by walking inside the U.S. capitol. They never hurt any money. Don’t fall for that kind of propaganda. What you can do is go from supermarkets and get our freedom. We just got a new batch of our Restore Freedom brochures and Fast Track youk Success brochures. They both have the same content inside. They both show you in 12 pages. No law requires 99% of Americans to find pay income and payroll taxes in 10 pages. I should say, okay, free. We mail them to you.

Free. Hand them out to people in front of supermarket. Restore freedom. Be free, be prosperous. Find inflation. Keep 100% of your hard earned money. I’ll do that. I’ll do that. There you go. And then put your name and phone number at the back bottom. And we’ll pay you. We will pay you cash, okay? Or gold or crypto. So that you get rewarded and thanked and acknowledged for your part in getting our message out. And restore freedom in America, all of you. Well, honey, I will do that. Very good. Call us. All right, Mary, thank you for calling.

I gotta get to other callers. I appreciate you, Mary. Thank you for calling us. We have a new caller right now. God bless you. Thank you so much. You are welcome. My pleasure. You better call. You better call. Okay, I’m going to ask him the Mary Call Rickus brochures. Okay. Hi, my name is Sherry. Sherry. S H E R R Y. Baby. I know, I know you saw Sherry. That’s it. That’s it. Sherry, baby. Hold her, Sherry. All right, sweetheart. I will call and get the brochures and go send them and go hand them out. There you go.

I like that passion of this lady. I’ll go outside of BJ’s. Yeah, Eddie, go. Go to the the most expensive supermarkets first. Why? Because on the average people that make more money are. They got them because they were not stupid. They got either inheritance or were smarter. So they’re more open minded, interest and literate to educate themselves on the average. But they go anywhere. Give it to your friends, dentist officers, mechanics officers. Where people go, wait, put our brochures out there for the people to read, okay? They pick it up and call. That’s why I asked people, how did you hear about us first, by the way? How did you hear about share? You didn’t tell me that.

How to hear about freedom Law School. See, I saw you first. I guess it was in the early 2000s. You were on TV. Some people TV show. And please forgive me, I that’s eluded me. But I remember you on TV and you were expounding about, you know, how we don’t have to pay taxes, that we don’t live in District of Columbia or various islands or territories. And. And then see you were. I think you were on Oprah. No, I was not Oprah on TV. But that’s over 20 years ago. That’s good. That’s good, Sherry. Thank you.

I gotta get to other people’s calls. Okay. Thank you for calling. Sweetie, let’s go. We have two callers right now. Area code 618. Can I stay on the line? Can I stay on the line? You can listen. Yeah, they can listen. No problem. Stay on and listen all you want. No problem. You are encouraged to stay on the line and listen. That’s all good, Sherry. No problem. We have a 601 area could call her caller next please. Give me your first name. I heard about us. And then your question please. Hey. Hey. Okay. My name is Greg and I heard about you on YouTube.

Marjorie. Marjorie video. Okay. And how may help you? So have you ever had the IRS figure your tax for you and impose liens on your property? I never had any taxes for them to do for me to begin with and never had a real estate for them to lead it. So what is your question about your situation? I didn’t hear what you said. I’m sorry. I never had a property for the IRS of tax to lien and irs. Never. I never had a tax requirement to file a tax return for them to do it for me.

They did lien me one time back in 2009 for over 600,000 for 13 years of employment taxes. They claim out of them, which I did not. And I beat them in tax, you know, IRS appeals office and tax court. Took me two years of fighting them, the crooks and criminals. They made up these phony numbers against me. So that’s in step five. I beat them at that. But what is your question? My question is what happened with the people who wrote Vultures and Eagles Clothing? I remember having that book in the early 2000s and didn’t that they.

They didn’t go along with the Freedom Plan and so they got convicted or something. What happened? My question is how? I’ll tell you. I know that Lynn Meredith, who wrote the book yes to Vulture Leaders Clothing, she was in Huntington Beach, California and I was in Tustin, California, about 20 minutes away. Okay. And we met back in 1993 and I was one of the first people to sell her books. I was a young activist. I was only 30 years old at the time and we became friends. And then once I found out that the state citizenship argument that she was making in her book along others was wrong, I put it out there.

She got upset at me, thought I was criticizing her. I wasn’t. I was saying the guy that taught us both about that, Richard McDonald was a mistake. And she stopped talking to me. And she did a lot of mistakes. She’s another one of those people that didn’t listen to me and my guidance. She lot of wrong things and back she was charged criminally and it was year 2004. She went to trial, convicted, put in jail, eventually got out. That’s what happened to them. How can I help you? Right. Okay. So old history, Greg. Yeah. So currently my wife and I are, were wanting to send the 2000 and I noticed it’s.

There’s guarantee that. How’s that guaranteed? Is there like something in writing or how, how does that work? And she also is asking me, how do you like? I filled out the form to see how much our Restore Freedom plan would cost to join. And it told me 2000 the minimum because we don’t make a lot of money. She’s wondering is that all we have to do? Just tell you how much we make? You guys don’t want to check it out? She has this big book that she keeps our business and she’s like, am I going to have to show that to them to get our price for membership or what? And so it’s how do you verify what we say our income is? And second, how do we verify that there’s a guarantee? Okay, so if you go to our website, freedomlawschool.org, take the gold bar There on how to go to seven steps.

Okay. To review the irs. Okay. But you know, sort of seven easy steps to regain your power and freedom. You click on that, and then you go to seven steps. You step six. When you go step six, you go inside that. Okay. Continue step six and you scroll down. You will come across the gold rectangle that says on it membership, calculation and application. You click on that. Okay. And. Yeah, let’s see. Here we go. We click on that. Let’s see how mine is not taking me straight to application. I wanted to go to. Oh, no, no, no.

I’m sorry. Application holdout. I’m sorry. Go below that at the very bottom of the page. And here a little bit lower, it’s the second goal bar. Sorry. Restore field plan agreement declares the Restore field plan agreement rectangle. Okay? And when you do that, it takes you to restore fuel Plan agreement. And here it spells out everything about the scope of agreement. What it covers all that in detail. The 100% guarantee is in here. Read it carefully. It’s not too long. If you have any questions about it, please call us. We’ll be happy to go over all of that with you.

And you ask about the 100% guarantee. It is there in paragraph 5. Okay? 100% guarantee. Read dieting carefully. It’s all the expenses wait for you, my friend, and hope you get with us and we help you. Now, here’s the thing about that. We do not verify how much you actually make. Okay? How much? Because I’m not a policeman like the Irish. I don’t want to be a policeman. For that I rely upon your honesty and, and your integrity to be truthful. That you are. Put the correct number on there. You’re supposed to put the correct number of approximately how much you make.

75,000, 520,000. Okay, you know, 10 million, 100,000, whatever that number is. You put that approximate number closest to near, rounded up to near 1,000 or 10,000 if it’s a higher income person. As long as the number is put pretty close to what it is, that’s good. You’re covered. But if you put it on there, you made only $50,000. So your membership would be 2,000. Then the IRS comes after you and it comes with $200,000. Guess what? You get no protection. You got no coverage. You get no guarantee. You just gave us a donation. You just hurt yourself by lying.

I’m a truthful person. Founding fathers were truthful people. And I hope I count on you to be the truthful people. I know Most Americans are. And most people in this movement definitely are for sure. So that’s how I do that. You hurt yourself if you lie on that on the form, okay? Because I base your membership based on 30% of what you would have otherwise paid the IRS. So obviously, if you make $10 million, you pay more. Your membership than someone who made membership was only $50,000. Okay? And it’s 30% what you would have owed the IRS.

So if you owe the IRS normally, let’s say $10,000, you take 30% of that 10,000, $3,000, you contribute to the Restore Freedom Plan. That protects you, protects the other $7,000 also, that you get to keep with 100% guarantee we do all the work, you will not go to prison. We pay the attorneys. You get unlimited consultation, if they ever take any of your money from law school, will reimburse you if you in full, whatever IRS took from you, 10,000, 10 million or more, and you have no risk at all whatsoever. That’s how that works. So 30% what you would have paid the IRS is calculated easily for most people by going to our website.

You go to our website at the top center, under Click on sign up, Click on sign up and there it is. Application comes up. There are very few short questions that you fill out. And it gives you a membership amount and you send it in to us along with the funds and you cover it. You do that year by year. Minimum membership, as you said, is 2,000. And when you tell other people about Freedom Law School, you love and spread the truth to the American people, okay? And empower them with the law and the truth to restore freedom in America and our families.

Okay? Now I’ll pay you 50% other people’s first year membership as a thank you, as a reward for you for sharing this information with other people. That’s why I suggest you call us and we’ll mail you at no charge or Restore Freedom brochure and fast track your success brochure. Okay, Send them out. We’ll send them out to you, no charge. Get them out to other people. Put your name and phone number at the bottom white area of the back of the brochures so we know it’s you that referred somebody to us. So we can pay you and thank and acknowledge and reward you.

Which is why I always ask, have you heard of us when you call on the Freedom Hour? Because if I know a friend of yours acquaintance referred it to us, I want to make sure I track it and reward and thank the guy. Hey, thank you. For telling Greg about us. Thank you for telling John about Marjorie. Yeah. When Marty was a broadcast, I was on. Okay, so that. That. That’s something that we arranged. That. That. That’s not you doing that. Okay. All right. She doesn’t get a thousand. No, she gets. So to clarify. Clarify the.

Paying the fee. So we sent in cash and is there like a receipt that we sent you something? And give us a. Hang on, hold on, hold on, hold on. Your phone cuts out. You’re cutting out a lot. Your phone cuts out a lot. I’m not hearing what you’re saying. Get the better area because you cut out a lot. Say it again. Hold on. Is this. Is this better? Yes. Try it again. So when we send or bouillon by registered mail, and then do you see. And you get our fee, our membership fee, do you send us something back that says, here’s your receipt for what you’ve paid? Of course we do law school.

Of course. Why would I not send you a receipt? Of course. How much? Have a record of it? Yes. Why would I not do that? Okay, so. Yeah. Yes. I don’t know. Because I’m just asking questions. Because the world’s full of shysters. Yeah, you sound too good to be true. So I’ve been burned before and I wanted to check. No problem. No problem. And it says. It says on his website that he’s got my back, but how do I really know? Yes, yes, we do, brother, because I’m here, number one, not for money, but for freedom.

I’m going to restore freedom in America, okay? I came from Iran, unfree country. And I want to do things upright and straight, okay? If I want a government to not be crooks and criminals, be honest, I gotta be honest myself first with you and everybody else out there. So, yes, I’ll definitely give you receipts when you get sent a payment to us. Okay. Thanks a lot. You’re welcome. Thanks for calling, Rick. I appreciate you, my friend. We have. Let’s see, somebody with a question up there before I go. Two callers we have online waiting for us.

We have two callers also. You guys want me to go to the online questions first? I can do that. We have an online question that guys want to have me answer. They say, let’s see who the question is. Here we go. I am on US Green card. I have concerns that I can’t get the US Citizenship if I don’t file income taxes. Is that true? Nope. I became a US citizen. And the only question they ask is that, did you ever stop? Did you ever not pay income taxes that you were required to file? As far as I know, no, I don’t think there’s a problem with that.

But if you give you the forms that they want you to fill, fill out first, let me know. I’m not an immigration law specialist. Okay. I’m not a bankruptcy law specialist, but I have some familiarity with bankruptcy, some familiarity with immigration laws because I’m an immigrant. I went through the process. So that’s the best answer I can give you on that. Okay. All right, let’s see. We have another question online. Before the caller is waiting for us on there. There’s another online question from. Let’s see, the Gulf side living health care. I recently filed bankruptcy. I owed the IRS 20,000 and that went in a bankruptcy.

My attorney said that if it wasn’t filing, if I wasn’t filing, I needed to file an extension in order for my bankruptcy to be accepted. Yes. Okay, well, you owe the IRS to 8,000. You know, to bankrupt tax taxes, the tax return must have been due three years ago. You filed at least two years ago. IRS had at least 240 days to collect from you. There’s a lot of restrictions. You cannot bed with just bankrupt taxes. And you must literally sue the irs. Drag away bankruptcy court a lawsuit to be able to bankrupt them. It’s not easy PC like bankrupting credit cards, old electric bills and water bills.

It’s not like that. So if you only owe 20,000, I would highly recommend do not do bankruptcy. Only 20,000. No. Chapter 7 bankruptcy should not be done by vast, vast numbers of people. You don’t need it. It’s not appropriate. They’ll rip you off. It’s going to cost so much money. The attorney will get paid is not worth it. I will highly caution you against just doing bankruptcy. Okay. I’ve seen many people. You totally screw the bankruptcy. Totally. Okay. And for $20,000 only filed tax returns. No, I would not do that. Okay. Can I go to question on call? This is more online question.

There’s one more online question if you want to have me reply from John Booth. If you don’t file until you die, how does your children inherit without estate tax? Oh, that’s easy. Not Only the first $50 million of estate taxes exempt according to the IRS from any taxes at all and vast numbers of people. The estate is much smaller than $50 million. But guess what? There is no law required to file pay federal estate taxes either. Even if you make billions of estate inheritance, you pay zero income taxes on it. Do you Put that on the website yet? Guys, the estate tax video.

Oh, man. This week we’re going to put it on. I’m going to put. People call me about estate tax. I’m going to put on a video about how Americans in the 50 states do not know estate income tax. I’ll give you a quick view of that right now. The seminal section on that is section 2001 of the internal revenue code. 26 USC 2001. Let’s see, hold on. 2001. Uscode.house.gov the official government’s website. All the laws is right here. Boom, it came up. Section 2001. This is the imposition and rate of tax. Okay, Come down here it is from Title 26 and Children of the code.

Okay. Okay. Subchapter A. Estate of citizens or residents of D.C. part one, tax imposed. Okay, this is subtitle B. Estate and gift taxes. So here it is. Imposition and rate of tax. A tax is hereby imposed on the transfer of taxable estate of every dissident who is a citizen or resident of the United States. There is that term again. United States. Yep. United States. Of course, we all know United States in tax law means what the District of Columbia. So that is for citizens and residents of D.C. yep. They are in fact, that. There you go.

Section 771. When using this title. Okay. They define many words. And the United States and state. Guess what? They both only include and mean only D.C. okay. So you don’t have to pay estate tax either, my friends. You’re all good and free. All right. I think we can go to the cause we have on the quick questions. Or do we? We have one from area code 770, I think. And we have another call from area code 615. What’s that? We want to do those 760615. We take a board. Okay. We’re just listening in. Okay. No more questions online.

Listen, if you have a question right now, the board is open. Call 4245521299 and press 1 on your telephone keypad. I will take your question next. Call 442-552-1299 and press 1 on your telephone keypad. And I will take you next online. Though we do have some questions. Let’s see. Who’s that? Dr. Kmagic. You can borrow against your life insurance if you have a fatal or terminal disease. Yeah. Why would you borrow your own money? Why would you pay someone else interest for use of your own money? Don’t buy the savings type life interest. Policies, universal life, whole, whole life cash value, they are ripped off.

They steal a part of your savings up front, 20, 30%, whatever up front. Bank of America, that Chase, Wells Fargo, they take none of your money as a fee to put your money with the bank, do they? No. But life insurance companies rip you off by doing it in detailed five pin contract that you don’t read. And then you want to take your money. You want to take your money out of the bank, you take it out. You don’t pay the bank no fee for taking your own money. But from a life insurance company, you have to borrow your money, pay interest to the bank for your own money.

What? Okay. All right. So let’s go to the next caller from Hard D Tennis. Working for C Corp. I filed exempt on W2. I heard if I earn over about 200,000 a year that I would have to make a letter to release liability from the corporation to the irs. Is there any resource about. I don’t know what the heck you’re talking about? You’re very vague in your question. Okay. Do you work for a C Corp you meet? Are you an employee or is that your own C Corp that hires you? I’m not clear, I guess. And then if you earn about 200,000 or more, you would have to make a letter to release liability.

Release liability for what? From the corporation. That’s not true at all. You have to do nothing. That’s not true. I don’t know where you got that. No. That’s balls. Okay. All right. And then he goes and asks, also, are C Corps considered working for the federal government? Since the shareholders are involved? No. The only corporations that must pay income tax are District of Columbia citizens. Okay, now you’re going to go down on 7701 section. Okay? And definitions, 7701. A 30 United States person means a citizen or resident of the United States, which means citizen or resident of Washington D.C.

a domestic to District of Columbia partnership, a domestic or within District of Columbia corporation. You must be within District of Columbia entity to be a United States person and owe a tax. All right, so you’re free. You don’t have to pay corporate income tax either. No income tax, federal income tax. You have to pay payroll taxes, either end, federal unemployment taxes, estate tax, corporate tax, gun manufacturing, gambling, waging tax. None of that apply to people in the 50 states. Yep. But they deceived us to make a state in the United states always means 50 states when it does not.

Okay. All right, so any other questions we got there, guys? Should I go to letters people send in the mail? Because we do have some letters to go through, guys. We have some letters here from. Let’s go here. Letter we got from New York from Lanos in Whippingers Falls, New York, got a notice of proposed driver’s license suspension. And state of New York Department of Taxation Finance says you must resolve your New York state tax debts or your driver license may be suspended unless you pay or respond within 60 days from the date of this notice, which was September 5, 2025, almost a year ago.

We will provide the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles DMV with your name, slave surveillance number and other identifying information and recommend that DMV suspend your driver license, pay the amount due or respond and provide proof that you are exempt from suspension. Okay. Or column. Well, on that second page she highlighted it says, suspension of your driver license will cause undue economic hardship. Okay, so anyhow, how to protest. Well, you had 60 days to protest it. You didn’t do that. Sorry. You should have done that. You didn’t know that. Read the letters, folks. When you get a letter, read them.

They’re plain English. At least read them. Okay? You should call me sooner, my friend. I’m sorry. You didn’t do that. But I think you can still call them and make a payment plan with them and they’ll reinstate your license. That’s what they want. As long as you come up with a payment plan, they will reinstate your license. Now, if next year you leave New York and move to New Jersey, okay, Or Virginia or Florida, some other state and get a driver’s license there, then you’re free. They cannot take your driver’s license again, so. But right now you probably want to do call, make a payment plan to get your driver that license back if they have taken it away from you already, because I don’t know.

All right, any questions online? No. We’re going to go to two more online questions by mail. We got Donnell and Maryland in Owens Ex Road, Alabama. Got a letter from IRS Philadelphia office, April 13, 2026. We’re sending. We auditing your 2024 Form 1040 and need a response from you. Yep. We audited your 2024 federal income tax return and need you to send additional information to support the following items. Claim your return, certain business expenses. Expenses. Well, that’s why you don’t do that. Folks stop filing 1040 income tax confession forms. That’s how they get to audit you.

That’s how they get to rape you because you keep signing those 10 for income tax confession forms. When you do that, that is how they get the power over you. That is how, okay, you state under oath that you owe the Irish money, number one, okay? And you give them the power to audit you because you filed their return. There’s no audit without a return. Without 1048, there’s nothing to audit. There’s nothing to question. There’s nothing to examine. You claim those expenses, but if you never have filed the confession form saying that you or the IRS anything at all in the first place, there would be no audit at all whatsoever.

So. But still, the best thing to do is I would ignore them because these letters don’t mean anything. Let them issue you a notice deficiency and challenge them in US Tax court so they cannot expand this to other years, okay. Informally, they add other years in there. And I would say join the Restore freedom plan for 2025 if you haven’t filed the 1020 confession form and be protected from this happening to you again. Okay? So no more 1048 confession forms on your own. Be free or join Restore freedom plan with 100% guarantee. You have two choices available for you.

Okay? All right. We have now another person with email question, Danielle and Mick from Dallas, Texas Peymon. I’m sending the attached form so you can answer the question. All right, Attached. You will see the franchise tax 2026 that we were told to be completed yearly. If not, we’ll lose the llc. Our accountant told us this. We are not using the LLC at the moment, but don’t want to give. Give it up as we pay to set it up. Well, in that case, you have to pay the franchise fee. Do we have to fill out this form yearly out for LLC Texas as we don’t want to lose it? Probably.

I do not know Texas state law. If they do, it’s usually yearly. Okay? Usually that’s what they have to do. Yearly fees you got to pay to maintain these LLCs. Some LLCs like New Mexico and Wyoming, there’s no annual fee at all, but Texas does. You may want to switch to a New Mexico or Wyoming LLC and have no more annual fees. You want to go that way, have no annual fees, or in Texas, you want to keep this one and pay annual fee because you paid so much money already to set it up. It’s up to you to decide.

And you’ve done your petition to your congressman. Great. Yep. That’s it. That’s it. Let me see. You got this franchise tax 2026 annual. It says right there, 2026 annual long form Report. Yes. Annually, you have to file and pay whatever the form is for this LLC franchise fee. Yep. You have an entity in most states. States they do have annual fees they expect you to pay to maintain that entity in good standing by the state law. We’re almost done. Any questions, call now. If you want to call us at the office, call us at 813-444-4800. We’ll help you free of charge.

To educate yourself, go to freedomlawschool.org our website, to be free. Okay, any more questions? The number to call right now is 442-552-1299 and press 1 on your telephone keypad. Again, the number dollar is 424-552-1299 and press one. I’ll take a call right now. 424-552-1299 and Press one. Okay, any questions online, guys? Everybody, that online ask question there. We’re good there. We have one more question. Looks like right from Hartenis. We already answered that question. Yeah, we already answered that question. I think we’re good there. Right? All right. And yeah, we answered both those questions. We’re good there.

All right. All right, guys, listen. I love you all and I want the best for each of you. I want a free, prosperous, healthy, positive, happy, harmonious life for all of you. The fact is, though I cannot make you free, you must choose PETA. It’s very simple. All you got to do is go to our website, freedomlawschool.org okay? And seek the truth. And the truth shall set you free. That’s the key. Attitude. You gotta have everybody. And go click on the gold bar on the front page of our website. Start the seven easy steps to regain your power and freedom.

And we do that. There are seven easy steps to free yourself from income tax slavery. And you can listen to these videos as you drive around town on your smartphone in your car, go to work, go shopping errands and listen to the videos while you wash the road at lunch at work and dinner at home. Put the video again. This time, watch and verify for yourself. Then everything you see@freedomlawschool.org is the law that you’re following. And it’s all. And you don’t have to be afraid of the irs. You don’t have to file pay income tax anymore.

No more. Sign those 1040 confession forms and put the rope around your neck because your accountant deceived you that to sign a 1040 form is a safe thing to do. It’s the opposite. You put the right Rope around your neck. When you sign a change for your income tax confession form and go to step three, you’ll recognize IRS is fooling you. They deceived you and bluffing you that they’re powerful. You’re weak. It’s the opposite. They are weak. IRS is a Wizard of Oz creation of the corrupt major media. To have you and Dorothy and her friends and words of all, be afraid of this toothless, incompetent, lazy, irresponsible, dysfunctional irs.

Okay? You’ve been brainwashed all your life. Pushing your buttons of fear, panic, stress, anxiety. They tell you to pay your taxes filed early by the media, charismatic preachers. Okay? The irs. No D program yourself of the lies, okay? And you can stop paying tribute to the irs. They are not your God. They are your public servants out of control. Okay? Simply write your lawmakers. Question the IRS authority by writing your congress members and filing income tax only if your congressman can show you the law that requires you to file pay income taxes. This is how you safely free yourself from Irish deception, robbery and slavery.

And you can do it all for free. Yes, for free. Now you can also take courage from our victories in step five, knowing that ours is none of this big Godzilla monster the corrupt major media has painted in your head for you. They’re a toothless, fireless lizard. If you stop filing 10 Franklin tax confession forms against yourself, okay? Like I have done successfully for over 30 years, okay? And then know that number of students who stop filing income tax would fill of law school first has ever gone to prison for not filing pay income taxes if they stayed with me, follow my instructions.

Nor have they had their paycheck or bank account levied or income or business seized by the IRS. And if you want to have 100% guarantee because 99% they will leave you alone when you don’t file any ways but you want to make it 100% guarantee, then the Restore Freedom Plan is for you. In a mold of America’s founding fathers, George Washington and company stopped paying 3% tea tax the corrupt King of England, King George. And then they instead they founded their own revolution to restore freedom for the colonists. We learned from them do the same same thing.

Don’t pay the assets that you don’t owe to them the federal income taxes and instead fund the freedom movement. That’s right, fund for your security. With Restore Freedom Plan you get a 100% guarantee you will not go to prison. We do all the legal work. We get unlimited consultation and attorneys. We pay not you. If they ever take your money, we’ll reimburse you in full. All that as long as you maintain your membership. And Restore freedom plan. Again, it’s an option. It’s a privilege. If you want to participate in it, you don’t have to. Okay? And then step seven is love and spread the truth, right to everybody you know.

Spouse, children, siblings, parents, family members, co workers, all your friends, the truth, the law. Educate them about this. And our freedom Law school will pay you 50% of their first year membership if they did choose to join our Restore Freedom plan. Folks, I can’t think of a better win, win, win than this. Can you win, win? This is totally winning. Everybody wins. America. People win. You win, your family wins. Who loses? Oh, I know who loses. The Epstein billionaire gang. They lose. The pedophiles, they lose. The warmongers. They lose because they don’t get to have your money through the government and then pass on to them.

Your money remains with you and your family. If you choose, it goes part of it. 30% to restore freedom in America, okay? Peacefully, with no violence and safety. So with that, my brothers, sisters, I give you all my love and I wish for you that you choose freedom. This was not an accident that you came across free of law school. You were meant to live free. You were meant to come across this presentation. So you take the time to go to freeoflawschool.org and free yourself and everybody around you that you love that you’ll give them a chance to be free as well.

Like you. Thank you for being with me. I’ll be back with you guys next Tuesday night again.
[tr:tra].

See more of FreedomLawSchool on their Public Channel and the MPN FreedomLawSchool channel.