➡ The Firearms Policy Coalition, Second Amendment Foundation, Maryland Shall Issue, and three individuals have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Maryland’s extensive carry bans. This follows the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Bruin case, which confirmed Americans’ constitutional right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. However, Maryland responded by making it illegal for permit holders to carry in most public places. The petition argues that this is an attempt to nullify the Bruin ruling and restrict the exercise of a constitutional right.
➡ There’s a lot of disagreement among different courts about gun rights, and this might lead to the Supreme Court stepping in. The main issue is whether gun rights are being limited too much, especially in states that are against guns. This could lead to a big court case about the Second Amendment, which is about the right to have guns for self-defense. It’s important to stay informed about this issue, as it could greatly affect our rights and freedoms.

Hey everybody, welcome back to the channel. This might be the biggest Supreme Court case since Bruin, for us. What’s going on everybody? Welcome back to Guns and Gadgets, your premier source for Second Amendment News. If you’re new here, this channel is where I break down the legal battles, the constitutional fights, and the political games being played against our rights every single day. We don’t do panic here. We just do facts, history, constitutional analysis, and I keep you informed so that you can stay active in the fight. And today, we’ve got a massive development.

Firearms Policy Coalition, Second Amendment Foundation, Maryland Shall Issue, and three individual plaintiffs have officially asked the United States Supreme Court to step in and strike down Maryland’s sweeping carry bans. This could be a case that becomes one of the biggest post-Bruin Second Amendment cases in the country because it goes directly to the question. What good is the right to bear arms if states can ban carry almost everywhere people actually go? And folks, when you see the list of places Maryland has banned lawful carry, you start to realize this isn’t regulation anymore.

This is nullification by geography. The case is called Novotny versus Moore, and the petition for a certiorari was filed May 20th. That’s what today’s 23rd, so two days, three days ago. And this is huge. But let’s step back a second because after the Supreme Court decided the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association versus Bruin back in June of 2022, anti-gun states panicked. Bruin said plainly, quite plainly, that Americans have a constitutional right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. The court destroyed the old May issue schemes that required citizens to beg and plead for the government to give them permission and prove some special need before exercising a constitutional right.

Maryland had one of those systems. Before Bruin, Maryland required citizens to show a good and substantial reason to get a carry permit, but after Bruin, Maryland courts acknowledged that standard was unconstitutional. So what did Maryland do? Did they finally respect the Constitution? No, no, no, no. Instead, Maryland lawmakers went to work, especially since they didn’t like what was going on in the Supreme Court. And they essentially said, fine, we’ll issue permits now, but we’ll make it illegal for permit holders to carry almost anywhere. And that is exactly what happened. The petition lays it out in black and white.

Maryland now bans lawful carry in or around public transportation, public demonstrations, state parks, state forests, health care facilities, museums, stadiums, racetracked casinos, amusement parks, restaurants and bars that serve alcohol, government buildings and school grounds. They even tried to create a default rule making it almost all private property was off limits unless the owner explicitly posted permission to carry. The famous vampire rule, the one that just got struck down in New York by a federal appeals, but that case isn’t quite done yet either. But think about that for a second. You can get a carry permit, but then the state says you can’t carry anywhere where people travel, gather, eat, work, protest, recreate anything or move through society.

You know, all the places where if someone was going to hurt you or rob you or attack you or try to really do something terrible, that’s where they would be. Now that’s not honoring Bruin. That’s trying to kill Bruin without openly defying the Supreme Court. And the petition absolutely torches Maryland over this. One of the strongest lines in the filings says this quote, if the right to carry a firearm in public does not include public locations that are owned by the government or where First Amendment protected activity is being carried out or where people go to eat and drink or to gather for amusement and recreation, then it is hard to know what the right to carry a firearm in public actually protects.

End quote. And that’s devastatingly accurate because that’s the game blue states are playing right now. They know they lost the direct attack after Bruin. So instead of banning permits outright, they’re trying to make carry functionally impossible. New York did it. New Jersey did it. California did it. Hawaii did it. Massachusetts done it. Maryland did it too. Now here’s where this gets even more important. The Fourth Circuit upheld most of Maryland’s bans. And according to this petition, the lower courts across America are now completely fractured on how to interpret sensitive places. Some courts are saying governments can ban carry in crowded places.

Others say places with vulnerable populations, according to whose definition. And while others say places where people gather socially, and yet some others say entertainment venues or public transit. And some have even said parks. The petition argues that courts are inventing new categories out of thin air. And honestly, that they’re right. Because Bruin, the decision never said states could declare basically the entire public square a sensitive place. In fact, Bruin specifically warned against that. The Supreme Court mentioned narrow examples like courthouses and legislative assemblies. Historically, those were secured places. Places with armed guards and controlled areas were also mentioned.

But Maryland and these lower courts are acting like anything with people in it labeled sensitive. And that’s not constitutional history. That’s judicial activism wearing colonial cosplay. Now there there’s another part here that really stood out to me when I read this petition was well over it was like 186 pages. But the petition argues that historically Americans were often expected to carry firearms in crowded public places for safety. And they often required men to bring firearms to churches and public gatherings. Why? Because the founders understood reality. A disarmed population is vulnerable.

The government cannot guarantee your safety. Police do not have a constitutional duty to protect you individually. And criminals do not obey gun free zone signs. In fact, that’s where most of the shootings take place. And that’s why this argument from anti gun states is so dangerous. They say we’re banning guns in crowded places for safety. But crowded places are exactly where people are often most vulnerable to violent attacks. Think about mass transit demonstrations, entertainment venues, parks at night. Think about riots. The petition actually quotes the historical understanding that gun control laws often make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants.

And that’s the truth. Gun free zones overwhelmingly create target rich environments for predators. Now the filing also absolutely dismantles one of the biggest anti gun narratives being used right now. The idea that crowded places were historically gun free. According to the government’s could simply ban guns whenever lots of people gather, then the entire right to public carry would be destroyed. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing happening right now. Maryland’s law proves that point because once you add together parks, transportation, entertainment, demonstrations, restaurants, government, property, schools, healthcare facilities, private property, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Well, there’s almost nowhere left to lawfully carry. The right exists on paper, but it disappears in practice. And that’s the core issue in this case. I want to give a quick shout out to the sponsor today’s video, CMMG. If you are serious about your Second Amendment rights, and you should also be very serious about the tools that you rely on. And that’s where CMMG comes in. These guys and gals are known for their innovation, their reliability, and building some of the most versatile, coolest systems on the market. Whether you’re looking at their radio delayed blowback platforms or dialing in your next build, or even a conversion kit to make things a little more affordable.

CMMG is pushing the envelope in all the right places. Check them out and use my new code, CMMG rules, one word, and you get an extra 5% off right now, 15% off and that extra five is running out. So jump on it now and support companies that support your rights. Now back to the story. Here’s another major issue raised in this petition. The plaintiffs argue that lower courts are completely ignoring the historical importance of security when it comes to so-called sensitive places. And that’s critical. Historically, if firearms were prohibited somewhere, there was often actual security screening, armed guards, controlled access, or some mechanism to protect the people.

Think of courthouses. You go through metal detectors, there are armed deputies everywhere, there’s controlled entry. But Maryland, they want ordinary citizens disarmed in wide open public spaces with no security whatsoever. No screening, no guards, no protection, just signs. And I’ve never seen a sign that stops evil. And that’s one of the strongest arguments in the entire case. Because if the state wants to disarm citizens, then the state assumes responsibility for protection. But these states want the power to disarm you without any obligation to secure you. And that’s not how liberty works.

And the petition calls out how absurd this has become. At one point, the filing notes that Maryland allows hunting in state forests, while simultaneously banning lawful self-defense carry there. Think about how ridiculous that is. You can carry a firearm to hunt an animal, but not defend yourself against violent criminals. That tells you everything you need to know. This was never about safety, it was always about restricting the exercise of a constitutional right. Now the petition also points out something extremely important. The courts are all over the map right now. The Second Circuit says one thing, the Third Circuit says another, the fourth something different, and the ninth something totally different from everything else.

There’s chaos. And when there’s chaos among the circuits involving constitutional rights, that is exactly when the Supreme Court is supposed to step in. So the big question now is, will the Supreme Court take the case? Honestly, I think there’s a pretty strong possibility, because this issue is exploding right now nationwide. And anti-gun states are openly testing how far they can go after Bruin. They’re trying to redefine sensitive places so broadly that the Second Amendment becomes meaningless outside your home. And if the Supreme Court does not intervene, then blue states will keep pushing further.

And that’s just reality. This case matters because it goes way far beyond Maryland. This is really about whether the right to keep and bear arms exists in real life, or is it just in theory? A constitutional right you cannot exercise in the places you actually live your life is not a real right. The Founders did not write the Second Amendment so that Americans could have an unloaded firearm locked away while moving through a maze of government-created gun free zones. Whew, say that one, one breath. They understood that the right to bear arms is a safeguard of liberty and self-preservation.

And right now, states hostile to the Constitution are trying to carve that right into pieces. This case could determine whether Bruin remains a landmark victory or whether anti-gun states can effectively ignore it through endless location bans. So keep your eyes open. I’ll keep you up to date with every step on this one. And if the Supreme Court does grant cert, this could become one of the biggest Second Amendment cases in our history. As always, I’ll keep you updated every single step of the way. If you appreciate this breakdown, support the channel by hitting the subscribe button.

It’s free. Doesn’t cost you anything. Then turn on the notification bell so that you’re notified of when I put out new information or go live. And thank you for sharing this video. And please share it everywhere you can. Because an informed citizenry is the last line of defense against government overreach, which is why this platform tries to silence channels like this. The Founders gave us the blueprint. And it’s up to us to defend it. God bless you. God bless America. Stay safe. Stay armed. Stay free. Take care. [tr:trw].

See more of Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News on their Public Channel and the MPN Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News channel.