➡ The speaker discusses the controversies surrounding the 1969 moon landing, questioning the authenticity of the footage and images provided by NASA. They point out inconsistencies in the shadows and angles in the photos, and question how the technology to land on the moon existed over 50 years ago but not today. The speaker also mentions the upcoming Artemis 2 mission, which will not land on the moon, and encourages viewers to share their thoughts on these controversies. Lastly, they briefly touch on investment advice, urging viewers not to sell out of fear during market sell-offs.
➡ The Artemis mission didn’t land on the moon, but only orbited it. There’s more to discuss about the moon footage and possible connections, like the Freemasonry link. The speaker has more videos about NASA, which they suggest is deceptive. They invite viewers to join them on Fridays at Living Swell to learn how to navigate life’s challenges.

Friends, on the heels of the Artemis mission, I’m continuing my moon coverage. You’re asking me for more about this, and I get it. It’s hard for some people to admit that they’ve been lied to. It’s hard to believe that the government, it’s hard to believe for some people that the government would lie to them, that the lies are so big and so widespread and so many people believe them, people will say, well, how could so many people be in on it? Well, not that many people have to be in on it when we look around and see how many people have fallen for it.

So we are going to be looking at, in just a moment, the actual footage from NASA from the moon landing in 1969. When you watch that, I want you to watch it very carefully. I want you to note the images, and I want you to, well, I’m going to break it down for you afterwards. To me, it’s very, it’s actually very sad to watch it now, all these years later. And you can see how they were mocking the public. I know, I know people do not want to believe that. They want to believe that there were all kinds of technologies available back then that don’t exist now to land on the moon.

In fact, this Artemis 2 mission, no one is landing on the moon. We’re told that they’re circling the moon three times. Of course, there’s all sorts of issues with the shadows, with the cameras, with NASA no longer having the technology to land on the moon, the Freemason connections with the astronauts. It just goes on and on. So in a moment, I’m going to play for you this exact video footage or film footage that we are told came from the moon. And it’s all about the moon landing that NASA released. And I want you to drop a comment letting me know what are the controversies that you’ve heard about the moon? What are the things that don’t add up for you? And then let’s talk about something down here on the non-spinning earth.

I’ll just bring you a quick message from the sponsor of the video and then we’ll dive right in. So, you know, Wall Street doesn’t lose money on sell-offs. You do. They’re counting on you to panic. They want you to sell out of fear. Then they will scoop it up at a discount. The big banks aren’t selling their gold. They are buying yours. Don’t let them shake you out of the position you built to protect yourself. They’re counting on your fear. So stop giving it to them, friends. I want you to go to noblegoldinvestments.com, get all of your questions answered by the experts, including any risks of investment, and find out about this limited time offer for those who qualify a free 10th ounce American Gold Eagle for all new qualified accounts.

I have a link to the link in the description. I’ve done several videos for you already about how things don’t add up. And even if you were to believe, you can see that it says NASA animation, even if you were to believe that this was real, why in the non-spinning world should we spend billions and billions of dollars on so-called space exploration when there are plenty of things that we need to tackle here at home. This is what we were told landed on the moon. It looks like it was wrapped up with the same sort of foil that they wrap chocolates in.

And there’s a lot of questions here, but let’s do this. Let’s watch this movie. And it is a movie released by NASA about the 1969 moon landing. Pretty feet down, two and a half, picking up some dust. Pretty feet two and a half down, pink shadow, four forward, four forward, drifting to the right a little, down a half, contact light. Okay, engine stop, lifting, uh, tanguality base here, the Eagle has landed, rocket train, train quality, we copy you on the ground, you got a bunch of guys about to turn blue, we’re breathing again, thanks a lot.

Okay, Neil, we can see you coming down the ladder now. I’m at the foot of the ladder, the lamb footpads are on the, uh, depressed in the surface about one or two inches. I’m gonna step off the lamb now. That’s one small step for man, so, one giant leap for man, so. Here we go, we got all your steering, it gets great. Oh, this is gonna be some kind of different ride. Hip you to the hoppity, hip to the hoppity, hip to the hoppity up and over you, when do you? Uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, hip to the hoppity along, one, two, hips, division, fly away, Houston.

Lights are good, we’re burning flat. I’ll just mid-shot flight, I’ll just mid-shot flight, All right friends, how do you like them apples? There were a few things that really jumped out at me. I thought this was very bizarre. The astronaut hopping along, as we’re told, on the moon surface, singing hippity-hoppity over hill and dale. Now, one thing that really grabs me about these images is we’re told that this so-called landing happened in the mid-morning when the sun was not that hot. So there was enough light to create shadows here, but not to illuminate the sky.

How could that be? That doesn’t make sense. Nor do these images of the lunar modules running across the moon’s surface. Who was taking these pictures? And why did it look like it was from a higher angle? These are not taken, does not appear to be taken by an astro, not on the surface of the moon. It looks like they were standing up on a, I don’t know, a scaffold or some sort of other Hollywood technique there. This, we’re told, is when the… I’m sorry, I don’t mean to laugh. This is when the module took off to return to Earth.

How is it we’re told that this portion of the lunar module is returning back to Earth? How is it that the camera was able to pan so accurately, the departure? Gee, almost like it was, I don’t know, Hollywood movie magic. How were they able to get these images back? Well, we have a very convoluted, complicated, complex answer, which often when these things are complicated, convoluted and complex, it’s because they don’t want us to understand. The exposed negative film converged with the gelatin-coated SO-111 bimat film was developed into a semi-dry chemical process and then was scanned by a flying spot line scanner that consisted of a cathode-rayed tube and a rotating anode having a high intensity spot of light.

A photo multiplier converted the light passing from the scanner through the film into an electrical signal whose strength varied with the density of the emulsion layer of the film. The images were then radioed to Earth as frequency-modulated analog signals to be assembled much in the manner of a wire photo, each image built up in swaths. That’s how we’re told that we got images like this. Oh, it makes perfect sense, doesn’t it? So this is Buzz Aldrin saluting the flag on the moon. Friends, you know that expression, the smoking gun, where investigators and detectives only need one compelling piece of information, one bit of proof, the evidence that is irrefutable that actually explains what happened.

So do you see the smoking gun here, friends? Well, there’s quite a large shadow here that we’re told is coming from this lunar module here that looks like it was put together with hope and a prayer. And we’re told that this is a shadow being cast by the sun. So the sun would be to the left of this image. However, we’ve got a flag. Well, there’s another smoking gun here. How could there be air on the moon if it’s a vacuum? And then we’re told, oh no, this flag was created in a folded position to stand that way, although it looks like it’s waving in the non-existent wind.

But take a look at the shadow of the flag pole. It’s going in the opposite direction. It’s irrefutable that there would be a light source to the right of this image. Then we see Buzz Aldrin, we’re told standing on the moon, and his shadow is coming from a light source to the left of the image, but it’s not parallel to the shadow that we see here from the lunar module. It’s slightly at an angle. And then there’s a little mound of dirt here, and we see a shadow there. None of these shadows, well, these are a little bit more parallel, but they don’t add up.

This is a smoking gun, along with the other smoking guns, including that NASA says, we just don’t have the technology to go back to the moon. We had it however many years, over 1969, 60 plus years ago, but we don’t have it today. That was actually over 50 years ago. The shadows don’t add up. The cameras, who took this image of the astronauts leaving Earth? Who took this image? Well, Peggy, they left a camera back on the moon. Oh, and it panned so perfectly. It of course didn’t look like it was made in Hollywood or anything.

NASA has very strange Freemasonry connections. I’ve covered this in previous videos, and we’re told now that the Artemis mission didn’t go back to the moon. They’re only circling the moon. You know, this type of footage doesn’t age well. Friends, there’s so much more to cover in the moon footage. Let me know if you’re getting moon fatigue or you would like me to continue. There definitely are connections that I could go deeper on, including the Freemasonry connection. If you’ve missed my previous videos, I have them for you here in my playlist about NASA, not a space agency, never a straight answer.

And of course, NASA in Hebrew means deception. I rest my case, friends. Thanks for being on board. I look forward to seeing you in an upcoming broadcast. If you’d like to join me over on Fridays, I’m at Living Swell where we leave the headlines behind and we learn how to keep our head above the waves in the stormy seas of life and our feet firmly planted on the non-spinning earth. [tr:trw].

See more of The Healthy American Peggy Hall on their Public Channel and the MPN The Healthy American Peggy Hall channel.