➡ Jeffrey Tucker’s article discusses the issues with mass testing for diseases like bird flu, as advocated by Deborah Burks. He argues that testing everyone, including animals, is not only impractical but also could lead to unnecessary panic and economic consequences. Tucker also criticizes the use of PCR tests, which he believes can lead to confusion between exposure, infection, and actual cases. He suggests that the real motive behind such extensive testing could be a desire for control and financial gain.
➡ The text talks about how not getting sick from a disease means you don’t have enough of it to spread. It also mentions the David Knight Show, which encourages critical thinking and spreading logic. The show asks for financial support and for people to share it. It ends by promoting trust in science, wearing masks, getting vaccinated, and using free speech to free minds.

Jeffrey Tucker has a good article, The Trouble with Testing. As he said, Deborah Burks is at it again, urging mass testing for the detection of bird flu. We’re not testing to really see how many people have been exposed and got asymptomatically infected. Asymptomatically. Every cow, weekly. You can do pool PCR. We have the technology. The great thing about America is we’re incredibly innovative and we have the ability to have these breaks. What a wicked person. We do testing every dairy worker. I do believe that there’s undetected cases in humans because we’re once again only tracking people with with symptoms.

When we did that with COVID, the virus. Because they’re the only ones who are sick lady. On detected because it took a long time to get to the vulnerable individuals. But in the meantime, thousands, hundreds of thousands of people were infected with asymptomatic or mild disease and never came to medical. If it’s asymptomatic or mild, we don’t need to worry about it. But she’s going to use, she’s gonna lock you down because there’s cooties that you don’t even know about. You may not be sick, but hey, you are a threat to us all, right? And so Jeffrey Tucker says the role of testing is relatively uncontroversial.

Well, not with me. He says, but it probably should be. I would say that it is primarily the controversy. And he does make the case further on this article that that is exactly the case. All of this stuff is predicated on the PCR PR campaigns. Maybe that’s what it stands for. The PCR public campaign. So what’s left of the out of the testing issue is a great question of why would we do it? Is it track, trace, and isolate? That has been proven to be impossible and has long known to be impossible.

Logically, if your theory is that people are getting this from one person coming in contact with another, if that’s your germ theory or your pathogen theory, well, if it’s fast spreading, fast mutating, then of course that’s not going to work. So what they’re telling you is logically inconsistent. Whether or not you believe in their virus theory or not. Whether or not you believe in their PCR tests or not. What they’re telling you is completely illogical and inconsistent. The iTunes and Google app stores had contract tracing programs that you could download.

That way, if you came close to somebody who had tested positive, you would be alerted. The snitch apps, remember those? It worked like a digital lepers bell. In fact, even now, the airlines are still doing COVID contact tracing for flying in and out of the country. Did you know that? Another reason not to fly. Another possible rationale is likely the one in the mind of Birx. Did she have a mind? She was formed in the AIDS era where the goal was zero infections. She was always a proponent of zero COVID.

Remember zero COVID? Do you remember the horrors in China? The people locked in the high-rises and they put the recordings out there at night. You can hear the people moaning in Shanghai and other places. You know how they destroyed those places? They got people, young people, after that. They said, you know, I had a really high-paying job here in the city. I’m going back to the rural countryside where we just go our own food and I think because I’m not going to go through this again. The zero COVID. That was the Chinese plan.

And that was what Birx was pushing. But when we talk about the fact that she was formed in the AIDS era, it’s an E-R-R-O-R, she was formed by the money that was given her to run an AIDS organization by the Gates Foundation, as I pointed out yesterday. Now that’s where she got her big leg up on everything, was in the AIDS issue and it was money from Gates to push that Fauci fraud of AIDS. And remember AIDS was based, the first one of these things, first disease that was based on PCR lies.

He said, think about the movie Contagion, 2011 and this way. It was a killer virus that you could get and get worse and then die, all rather quickly. In the movie, the job of the health authorities was always to find the infected and to notify everyone with whom they had had contact. By the way, he says, this didn’t even work in the film. Again, he said the question beckons, why are we doing all of this? If you’re going to embark an elaborate invasive scheme to find and isolate every instance of a pathogen, it’s a good idea to know precisely that you’re trying, what you’re trying to precisely achieve with this effort.

No interviewer has been smart enough to ask this fundamental question of Birx, what are you trying to accomplish here? Since this can’t possibly work the way that you’re explaining the spread of the disease, why are you doing this? Problem is, you know, I don’t think they’re not smart enough to ask that question. I think they know the answer. I think they know this is a scam. They’ve got to know it’s a scam and I think they just, you know, to them it would be a rhetorical question. They know why she’s doing it.

She’s doing it because she wants to lock us down for power and money. That’s why all of these things are being done. So in a sense, they don’t ask a question because I already know the answer and you know the answer. I know the answer. Jeffrey Tucker knows the answer. These people who have access to her know the answer. You think she’d come on my show? Could I ask her that question? Hey Dr. Scarf, we’d like to interview you. Birx does not want to limit testing to people either. She wants cows and chickens tested too.

Okay, so he takes us out to its logical extension. He says, so there’s no particular reason to limit it just to cows and chickens and humans. It can include every member of the animal kingdom, every four-legged creature, every fish, every fowl. And of course the expense would be very enormous and unthinkable. And by the way, it’s not just limited to the four-legged creatures or the fish and the fowl. It’s also, it’d be the Z bugs. Wait a minute, those bugs that you want me to eat? Have they been tested for bird flu? I really wouldn’t want to get bird flu from a bug.

That’s a lose-lose situation, isn’t it? But anyway, since this would drive the cost of meat production, if you want to check all the chickens and cows and you find one case of an animal that’s not sick but fails your PCR procedure, you kill all the animals on the farm, it’s gonna drive the cost of food sky-high. Bingo, that’s the purpose of it. We don’t even have to ask Birx. We know what the purpose is, don’t we? He says, given the inevitable slaughters that would be mandated, we know what the purpose of this all is.

This is made worse as we learned last time by PCR tests. It can be set at any cycle rate to discover the mere presence of a virus or genetic sequence in just about anything. The last time, this led to unwarranted assumptions of contagiousness. Up to 90% in 2020 was unwarranted, as reported by the New York Times. Sometimes the New York Times will tell you the truth more so than zero hedge, which zero hedge seems to have taken the position that we need to be zero bird flu, right? And unless we’re zero bird flu everywhere and we got to test everybody all the time, make sure that we’re still zero, are we still zero bird flu? If not, you know, panic, like everything down.

I think zero hedge needs to change their name to zero bird flu because that’s what they’re pushing. They’re pushing the same Chinese insanity. He says, because there is, there was and is so much confusion about this piece, let’s just quote it directly from the New York Times. Here’s what they said. This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus called the cycle threshold is never included in the results sent to doctors and to patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are. Why don’t they report that same reason that they hide the data about climate change? The same reason that they hide all of this data, the data about vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths and all the rest of the stuff, because they’re lying to us, they will never mention the number of amplification amplification cycles because they didn’t even tell the doctor and the patient how much they’re amplifying it.

They talk about 40 cycles. That’s two to the 40th powers, 1.1 trillion times. It was precisely the PCR test that created this wild confusion between an exposure and infection and an actual case. He said the word case in the past has been reserved for somebody who was actually sick and who needed medical intervention, but all of this fear and everything that they’ve done with the so-called pandemic is based on conflating exposure to infection to cases. If they magnify the stuff by over a trillion times, if you were exposed to whatever it is that they’re trying to find, it may not make you sick.

And if it doesn’t make you sick, it’s because you don’t have sufficient quantity of it to be sick, which means that you can’t spread it, which means that you, if you’re exposed to it, but you don’t have an infection. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you’ve been exposed to logic by listening to the David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science.

Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don’t ask questions. Using free speech to free minds. It’s the David Knight Show. [tr:trw].

See more of The David Knight Show on their Public Channel and the MPN The David Knight Show channel.