Summary
➡ The country is facing a spiritual battle between traditionalists and proponents of leftist ideologies, with this struggle being mirrored in the electoral process. The traditionalist side seeks to preserve freedoms and integrity, while the leftist side is viewed as advancing an oppressive agenda through various societal aspects including government and education.
➡ The text discusses an ongoing investigation into the Biden family, raising concerns about potential influence peddling and corruption. Notably, it mentions Devin Archer’s scheduled testimony about the Bidens’ alleged criminal activities, his attempts to delay his imprisonment until after his appeal process, and the role of the Department of Justice and a presiding judge in this case. Archer’s testimony is particularly significant given his past association with Hunter Biden, where he implies frequent contact between Hunter and Joe Biden during business negotiations.
➡ The text entails allegations of corruption against President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, suggesting that they engaged in influence peddling. The testimony by Hunter Biden’s business associate, Devon Archer, insinuates that Joe Biden interfered with his son’s business partners while vice president. This contradicts Joe Biden’s previous statements that he knew nothing about Hunter’s business dealings, which Bank records and other evidences seem to challenge.
➡ The plea deal linked to Hunter Biden’s case, fraught with complexities and potential political implications, is sparking outcry in Washington D.C. The case raises questions about Hunter’s potential status as a foreign agent, with speculations about President Biden possibly pardoning his son and not running for re-election in 2024 emerging.
➡ The narrative suggests a possible large-scale political conspiracy involving President Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, and others within the Democratic party. The theory proposes potential political assassinations, manipulation, and strategic power plays result in Newsom gaining presidency and appointing Michelle Obama without an election. The conversation also involves accusations directed towards Barack Obama relating to controversial death circumstances of his chef. Further suspicions suggest a lack of investigation and possible cover-up.
➡ The speaker is expressing suspicion and demand for investigations into alleged sexual perversities, potential abnormal indications on autopsy results, and possible cover-ups related to high-profile figures. The speaker also predicts intense political developments after Labor Day, appreciating Jim’s work, and announcing upcoming engagements on Globalfreedomtv.com.
Transcript
Specifically, the indictment of President Donald Trump by the left wing lunatic Democrat prosecutor. We’re going to be exploring that and other stories with the great Dr. James Fetzer. Jim, let me first open it up with the Breitbart article. I think this is the most important story of the day. Let me read this before we jump in to your analysis and your presentation. This just came out today, and I want to read this to people.
Here’s the screen share now, mind you, let me just say, I tried to share this story also here on RT Russia Today, which is a very fascinatingly and ironically truthful website. Russia Today tells more truth than most of the mainstream media. But I couldn’t share this link on Facebook. Facebook said this link goes against our community Guidelines. And I wrote, this is not against community guidelines. This is a piece of news regarding the indictment of a president.
And if you don’t immediately allow this to be shared on Facebook, you are violating my rights, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. But Facebook is in the process of trying to block this. So this is the Facebook story or the RT story. Trump Indicted over Capitol Riot. But here’s the Breitbart story. Indictment 3. 0 Jack Smith Indicts Trump a day after Hunter Joe Biden implicated special Counsel Jack Smith announced Tuesday night that a grand jury in Washington, DC Had indicted former President Donald Trump on charges relating to the January 6, 2021 riot at the US.
Capitol. The indictment was announced the day after President Joe Biden had been implicated in a long running influence peddling scheme by his son Hunter’s former business partner, Devin Archer. In testimony before the House Oversight Committee, trump was indicted on four counts one on conspiracy to defraud the US. One on conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, one on obstruction and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and one of conspiracy against rights.
The indictment declares despite having lost, the defendant was determined to stay in power. So for more than two months following Election Day on November 3, 2020, the defendant spread lies that there had been outcome determinative fraud in the election that he actually won. These claims were false and the defendant knew they were false. The Department of justice is not in a position to determine that is false or true.
The Department of justice does not do election counting or election analysis and has not been involved with this. So for them to claim that the claims of general election fraud were untrue it’s out of the context for the Department of justice. I was there, and I would say, in addition to other amicus briefs that are going to be filed, there was compelling and there is compelling and there will be more compelling evidence of algorithmic manipulations with the voting machines.
Obvious Chinese Communist Party purchasing of the voting machines through Union Bank of Switzerland, through Staple Street Capital, the voting machines being manipulated online, the 2000 Mules evidence. There were all sorts of anomalies, all sorts of false declarations, all sorts of funny business, and other members of Congress like Gosar and others were drawing attention to it. So this claim by the Department of justice to say any claims of election fraud are false, they don’t have the proof to do that.
But continuing the indictment does not indicate how prosecutors were able to establish what Trump himself believed, other than the fact that he had been informed by others that his suspicions of fraud were false. Nor does it distinguish the case from the Russian folks spread by Trump’s opponents, including within the Department of justice after he won the 2016 election. Well, he was told by Sidney Powell, told by Pat Byrne, told by General Michael Flyn, told by Rudy Giuliani, told by Patrick Berge, told by Scott Bennett, told by Millie and Gavin Newsom or Gavin Wince that there was sufficient election fraud material.
So these things and people certainly should be brought in as witnesses to support the president. There are several unnamed unindicted co conspirators in the indictment as well. These are four attorneys, a Department of justice official and a political consultant who worked on Trump’s strategy to challenge the result. Oh, I wonder if they’re going after Pat Byrne or Flynn or someone else. The former president shared the news on his own social media platform, Truth Social, that he expected to be indicted and claimed that federal prosecutors had delayed doing so for more than two years to keep him out of the presidential erase.
I hear that Deranged Jack Smith, in order to interfere with the presidential election of 2024, will be putting out yet another fake indictment of your favorite president, me at 05:00 p. m. . Why didn’t they do this two and a half years ago? Why did they wait so long? Because they wanted to put it right in the middle of my campaign. Prosecutorial misconduct. Though the indictment was sealed, president Trump’s campaign acknowledged it and released a statement to the media.
This is nothing more than the latest corrupt chapter in the continued pathetic attempt by the Biden crime family and their weaponized, Department of justice, to interfere with a 2024 presidential election in which President Trump is the undisputed frontrunner and leading by substantial margins. And why did they wait two and a half years to bring these charges, fake charges, right in the middle of the president’s winning campaign for 2024? Why was it announced the day after the big Crooked Joe Biden scandal broke out from the halls of Congress, the answer is election interference.
The lawlessness of these persecutions of President Trump and his supporters is reminiscent of Nazi Germany in the 1930s, the former Soviet Union, and other authoritarian dictatorial regimes. President Trump has always followed the law and the Constitution with advice from many highly accomplished attorneys. These unamerican witch hunts will fail, and President Trump will be reelected to the White House so he can save our country from the abuse, incompetence, and corruption that is running through the veins of our country at levels never before, never seen before.
Three years ago, we had strong borders, energy independence, no inflation, and a great economy. Today, we are a nation in decline. President Trump will not be deterred by disgraceful and unprecedented political targeting. Trump has now been indicted three times. First in Manhattan in April on state charges relating to payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, second in Miami in June on federal charges related to White House documents, and third in Washington on January 6.
The judge in the latest indictment will be Tanya S. Chutkan, an appointee of President Barack Obama. Oh, well, there’s a winner. That’s the story there. I won’t read the RT one, but Jim, I’ll hand it to you to get your comment and then we can jump into what your stories are going to analyze. Go ahead, Jim. Fetcher well, Scott, you absolutely hit it right out of the park.
I mean, they have brought this indictment right after stunning testimony by Devin Archer to the House Congressional Oversight Committee, that President Joe Biden, who has denied having any involvement in his son hunter’s business activities, actually was over a ten year period, put on a speakerphone on 20 plus occasions to promote the brand. That was a Biden family brand. That was a Biden crime family headed by the big guy, Joe Biden.
So to deflect attention, they have run up this phony release. And Scott, those claims about Trump knowing he lost know nevertheless, going ahead and certified are categorically provably false. I mean, look, historically, American politicians regularly complain about election outcomes when they’re on the losing side. It would be nothing improper or unusual or unexpected for Donald Trump to have questions about it, but in his case, it’s provable. I went through all the polling data before the election, all the polling data after the election, all the irregularities during the election, including the discontinuation of the count at about 03:00 a.
m. In the morning in five key swing states. Well, when they resumed the counting, there’d been a huge jump for Biden to put him ahead of Trump so that he could then coast to become the winner in those states because of manipulating the outcome. I mean, it’s clear and convincing. And the very idea of making such an outrageous statement is that it was false when it was true or that he should have known when it was provable.
That what Trump was claiming was correct is just outrageous. And it reflects a real low point. I mean, we’re scraping the bottom of the barrel. There is no integrity, no ethics, no law, no justice in the Department of justice today. This is outrageous, Scott. And every American has to rise to the occasion to oppose. I’ll finish here and let you carry with it on the stories. But I sense and I see that this country and this election is morphing into something of a primeval battle, of a spiritual battle.
And on one side you have the traditionalists, the conservatives, the religious people, the moral people, hindu, black, brown, Asian, Hispanic, white, it doesn’t matter. Catholic, Baptist, even atheist, doesn’t matter. The reasonable people on the one side who love their freedom, love their property, love their rights, love their lives, love their children and their know are peaceful people but want to remain with integrity, want to remain unstained, untouched, unmolested, uncoersed, unpushed by this other side, which finds its identity as Thomas Sowell and many of the conservative authors have said, the left find their identity in pushing and shaping and threatening and brow beating and manipulating and trying to force and shape other people how they should live, what they should think, what they should say, what they can’t say.
Or else you’ll be banned from social media. You’ll be kicked out of college. You’ll be kicked out of work. You have to wear a mask, or else this is a grand spirit that has taken over this country. So this election environment, this election issue is not about the nuts and bolts of an election anymore. It’s about a spiritual battle to the death with those who are trying to advance their religion of tyranny, of leftist wokism.
And they’re doing it through government. They’re doing it through weaponization of government. They’re doing it through the weaponization of the schools and the brainwashing of children, the homosexual transgender madness that they’re putting into children. All of these things are causing people to look past the election nuts and bolts and see this as something totally different. It’s not just a civil war, Jim. It’s not like the north and the south and well, the slavery to be a slave, to not to be a slave what states rights versus federal rights.
This is different. This is about evil masquerading as good trying to advance. And the way they’re doing it, they’re trying to take out and kill the guidon bearer. President Trump is just the guide on bearer carrying the flag that people have been following. And everybody knows they’re trying to take him out thinking that if you take him out, the crowd will surrender, the crowd will disperse, the crowd know, become the slaves and jump on the galleyship and row it in the direction of the democrat leftists and all that.
No, they’re wrong. If they take out Donald Trump, a new man will rise. And it doesn’t mean DeSantis either. If they take out Donald Trump, they will only quicken a revolution, a civil war, an independent eruption, whatever it is. So I think the country is going towards a tremendous clash, not because conservatives are going in that direction, but because the left and the liberals are running at them.
Right? It’s like that classic scene in Braveheart where Mel Gibson and the Scotsman are all on the field of battle and the heavy horse start charging at them and they say, Hold. And then at the last minute they pick up these twelve foot spears and all the heavy horse that was running to gallop them down are all impaled on the spears and the Scotsmen then get up and kill them all and take over the battle.
I see the same analogy being played out in America. Conservatives are holding and the left is running at them, and it’s just a matter before we pick up our spears and end the fight very quickly. Jim well, I would draw a different comparison with The Godfather. I mean, you had Don Corleone played by Marlon bando, and he had his conciliary, Tom Hayden, played by Robert Duvall. And with the Biden crime family, you have Don Joe, and we don’t know who’s playing the part.
And then we have his conciliary played by Merrick Garland because the Department of justice has simply turned into an extension of the Biden crime family. And I do not believe, Scott, in the history of the United States we’ve ever had such blatant corruption so openly displayed, and the mere raw power of the government to perform acts that are unconstitutional, illegal, corrupt from the beginning has ever been instantiated in the history of the United States before.
This is appalling and repulsive, totally undemocratic and unamerican, and there it is staring us right in the yeah, yeah. Well, let’s bring up your slide presentation and begin to look at these stories and I think it’ll fill in the gaps as we go. Well, just as an illustration, the Department of justice on a Saturday the Department of justice doesn’t do anything on a Saturday sent out a letter trying to get a fast sentence against Devon Archer before he could testify on Monday.
I mean, this was absolutely stunning. No one in Congress and no one familiar with the operations of the Department of justice could view this as anything but extraordinarily suspicious. In fact, clearly overtly. Corrot on the eve of a very high profile House committee testimony by Hunter Biden business associate Devin Archer. Mysteriously, the DOJ from the Southern District of New York asked Judge Ronnie Abrams to schedule a date for Archer to report to prison in an unrelated case.
If Sunni SDNY was attempting to threaten or intimidate Archer in advance of its testimony, this is the path it would take. I mean, this is the way a crime family would operate. Get this with Maria Martaroma interviewing the head of the committee Sunday morning with what some are calling the biggest political scandal in recent memory the Biden family’s alleged business of influence peddling. Oversight Committee member Nancy Mace telling me Joe Biden and family may have taken in upwards of $50 million from foreign nationals while he was a sitting vice President and beyond.
Tomorrow, a key player in the Biden business partnership is set to testify before Congress behind closed doors. Former Hunter Biden business associate Devin Archer set to sit for an on the record interview with House Oversight Committee members behind closed doors Monday morning on just how involved Joe Biden was in Hunter’s foreign deal making. The New York Post Miranda Devine is reporting that Archer is expected to reveal hunter put his then vice President father on the phone with business associates at least two dozen times.
This, of course, would appear to contradict President Biden’s claim that he never spoke with Hunter Biden about any business deals. Miranda Devine will join us coming up in this broadcast. Stay with us for that. Meanwhile, Hunter’s plea deal with his father’s DOJ unraveled on Wednesday after a federal judge balked at Hunter’s lawyer’s demands that his plea would exonerate him from any future criminality, even as prosecutors had to admit he is in fact, under active investigation right now.
This after Hunter’s lawyers misrepresented themselves to the court in trying to get whistleblower testimony removed from the evidence. One day after the deal fell apart and Hunter pleaded not guilty, the DOJ went after President Trump again, with special counsel Jack Smith adding three new charges against the former President over his handling of classified documents. Joining me right now in this Sunday morning Futures exclusive is the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, congressman James Comer.
Mr. Chairman, good to see you. Thanks very much for being here this morning. Good morning. I want to ask you about your investigation, but first let me get to this breaking news. I have in my hand a letter from the Department of justice that was sent to the Southern District of New York on Saturday. By the way, Devin Archer is testifying on Monday. Do you ever see do you usually see the DOJ send letters like this out on a never never.
This is the first time I’ve ever heard of the Department of justice doing anything on a Saturday. So what is this letter? Can you walk us through it? The government is apprising the court of the status of Devin Archer’s appeal of his judgment of conviction, and they request that the court set a surrender date for the defendant to report to a facility. Please walk us through what this letter says.
Yeah, the letter from the Department of justice is trying to nudge the judge to go ahead and sentence Devin Archer for something unrelated to what we’re going to be talking to him about tomorrow. It’s odd that it was issued on a Saturday and it’s OD that it’s right before he’s scheduled to come in to have an opportunity to speak in front of the House Oversight Committee and tell the American people, the truth about what really went on with you know, I don’t know if this is a coincidence, Maria, or if this is another example of the weaponization of the department of justice, but I can tell you this the lengths to which the Biden legal team has gone to try to intimidate our witnesses, to coordinate with the Department of justice and to certainly coordinate with the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee to encourage people not to cooperate with our investigation to encourage banks not to turn over bank records, to encourage treasury not to let us have access to those suspicious activity reports.
It’s very troubling and I believe that this is another violation of the law, this is obstruction of justice. But nevertheless, we’re going to continue to move forward and try to present the American people with the facts and the truth about this President and his family. Tell me how many suspicious activity reports you have seen. How much money do you expect that the Biden family has taken in? Update us on your investigation into this influence peddling sunday morning.
There’s going to be more coming. But it’s absolutely stunning what’s happening here with a corrupt DOJ requesting the court to order Devin Orchard’s surrender for imprisonment prior to his testimony on the Biden crime family. May I say something, Jim, real quick? On Department, it is not the Department of justice that can make that decision. It is the judge that is in charge of the sentencing and the direction that turns the person over to the Bureau of Prisons.
And that judge received a letter from Congress saying, it has come to our attention that testimony from Mr. Archer is essential to the national security of the United States and we therefore ask he be left on his own recognizance, given bail, pending appeal, kept out of jail until his appeal, which is not out of the ordinary. There are many people that do not go to jail until after their appeal process is exhausted.
And this seems to be a particularly essential application of that thought when Devin Archer is being mandated to produce testimony before the people of the United States in the Congress. And this judge has a duty under the law, under oath to the Constitution to support and protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. If that judge does not prevent Devon Archer from going into prison, she’s aiding and abetting injustice in the enemies of the United States.
In a sense, there’s all sorts of poetic and legal rhetoric that can be applied here. But this judge does not have to send him to prison and the Congress can demand he doesn’t. And anyway, I just wanted to say that the Department of justice have nothing to do with the sentencing. The judge could say new evidence is coming out and in know Devin Archer this is part of a downward departure, too.
His testimony should earn him a downward departure and a reduction of his sentence. He is aiding the American Congress and thereby the Department of justice in their exploration and prosecution of Hunter Biden. So Devin Archer, in a sense, is providing material that would help the Department of justice prosecute crimes against the Constitution, which gets him a downward departure. But of course, the Department of justice is upside down because, like you said, they are a weaponized form of the Biden administration, not the premier law enforcement and constitutional protection agency.
So I just want to put that in context. Go ahead. This is just a crime family exercising its muscle. The development comes amidst Archer’s ongoing appeal, as you imply, before his scheduled testimony about the criminal activities of the Biden crime family. The letter requests the court has set a time and date for archery report to a facility chosen by the Bureau of Prisons. In light of foregoing, the government respectfully requested a Fennet Bureau to surrender at a date and time determined by the court, but better, hopefully, they would like if he testifies before Congress to a facility designated by the Bureau of Prisons.
The government has conferred with counsel for the defendant and added that Council asked that council propose a date for his surrender. Archer’s counsel, however, responded just as you have observed, mr. Archer believed it premature to set a report date in light of his anticipated continuing appeal. They’re asking him to appear to go to prison before his appeals have been exhausted, as well as the newly discovered sentencing errors the government has now conceded.
Counsel for Mr. Archer will put in a response the government’s request by Wednesday. Despite the opposition, DOJ continues to push for a surrender date to be set. This is clearly an attempt to intimidate Sunday. Representative James Comer joined Maria Barterimo on Sunday Futures expressing his concern over the timing and implication of the DOJ’s action. Last week, even a month ago, it was announced he’d be testifying in front of the House Oversight Committee.
Many have predicted he’d testify about at least 24 instances of Biden’s engagement with Hunter over the phone. Now, Marjorie Taylor Green had been very concerned that they were not going to get Devon before the committee. She said Devon’s Monday testimony was productive, that she held her breath after he canceled testifying to Congress three previous times. Archer River’s interview Monday morning. His testimony is important because he served on Barisma’s holding board with Hunter and was his partner in dealing with Bohai Harvest and any controlled by Chinese state owned interest.
I was holding my breath, you know, and then I found out for sure he was on his way. I was like, this had finally happened. And then it turned into, God, I hope he does the right thing. The country needs this man to tell the truth. So he came in and he told the right thing. Devin Archer testified under oath that Joe Biden, the Big Guy, was put on speakerphone by Hunter more than 20 times and revealed the reason why.
The Gateway Pundit has previously reported Archer would testify to this last week. Meanwhile, Benny Johnson tweet breaking Hunter Biden former business partner Devin ARP testified that BP Joe Biden was put on Tweaker vote 20 times to sell the brand. In business discussions bill Hammer this is intriguing. Archer tells the House Hunter put BP Bryden on a speakerphone more than 20 times to sell the brand. In business conversation, Archer goes on to testify there was value in adding Hunter to Burisma’s board, burisma being an energy company out of Ukraine, that Hunter brought the most value to the brand, but it was actually his father.
Archer stated Barisma would have gone under if not for the brand. In other words, if not for the combo of Hunter and the Big Guy. In December 2015, the Order of Barisma placed constant pressure on Hunter to get help from Washington DC. To wit, from his father. Regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor, Victor Shokin the energy company wanted to do business in America even to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
But it could only happen if they got away from the investigation that was pending. Brenda Devine called today’s testimony a bombshell. Devin Archer’s testimony today is a bombshell. Hunter Biden’s ex best friend, testified the value of adding Hunter to Brisma’s board was the brand and confirmed that then Vice President Joe Biden brought the most value to the brand. Here’s more in December of 2015, Michaela Zyochevsky, the owner of Barisma, and Vadim Posarsky, an executive of Barisma, placed constant pressure on Hunter to get help from DC regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor.
Here’s how it’s been played out in the mainstream scott you will find this unsurprising in many ways, but it’s so unbelievably deceitful. Ex Hunter Biden co worker testifies in closed door session Archer tells lawmakers then VP didn’t meddle at the subheading washington Hunter, Biden’s former business partner, insisted in testimony to Congress Monday that President Joe Biden was never directly involved in their financial dealings, though Hunter would often put his famous father on speakerphone to impress clients and business associates.
If that’s not meddling or being engaged in his business, what the hell is it? He’s having business conversation with his father on the speakerphone to impress clients. This is a contradictory paragraph. The Republican led House Oversight Committee conducted more than five hour interview with Devin Archer as part of expanding congressional inquiry into Biden family business, as the Gob explores a potential impeachment inquiry. Both Republican and Democrat lawmakers inside the closed door interview said archer testified that over the span of ten years, hunter Biden put his father on the phone about 20 times while in the company of associates, but never once spoke about any business dealings.
Well, what was the point of putting him on the speaker phone new York Representative Dan Goldman, who represents Democrats inside the room, said Archer testified Hunter sold the illusion of access to his father by taking credit for things his father did as vice president. He Hunter had no part in scott how bad is this? Let me just say right there is a very important part when he says, well, Hunter Biden was just selling the illusion.
If I was a Ukrainian oligarch and Barisma are over there, I’d say, Hold on, I’m not buying illusion, I’m buying real thing, right? They would have said, Wait a minute, I’m not buying the illusion. He’s not selling me an illusion. He’s selling me access. He’s telling me, here’s my dad, him and I are budies and pals. And what he does, I do and blah, blah blah. Oh. Duh okay, if you say so.
So it’s important to put yourself in the Russian or the Ukrainian oligarch position. They were not buying an illusion. They were buying the real thing. Now, Hunter may have lied and been playing fast and slick like he’s know, prostitute slick, drug addict he is as his father is, but he was not selling an illusion to the people who bought it. They were buying influence. They were buying Joe Biden by saying, you do what we want, Joe, and we’ll give your son money and he’ll give you money.
That’s a very important part because these people who were buying Biden should also testify and say, you know what? We were buying Joe biden. We were buying Hunter Biden, not their illusion. So I think it wouldn’t be beyond the pale because they’re doing it. Devon archer bring in other people to know, hey, you have a full immunity deal. We’re not going to throw you in jail. You have full immunity under the Congress of the United States to testify as a Ukrainian oligarch.
Were you buying Joe biden? Duh yes, we were buying Joe Biden and they lied to us, those son of a bitches. You know, anything’s possible. I’ll hand it back to you, Jim. Go ahead. Oh, you got it right. Scott, I thought you captured the spirit of the enterprise. Exactly. Get this. Law professor Jonathan Turley is among the very best Biden influenced pedling, one of the greatest corruption scandals in Washington history.
And if you think about the history of Washington, that’s saying something. Constitutional law scholar Jonathan Turley responded to testimony by Hunter Biden business associate, Devin Archer by declaring that President Joe Biden has been lying and that his influent peddling may amount to one of the greatest corruption scandals in the history of Washington. Archer, who served with Hunter on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Marisma, testified in a closed door meeting with the House Oversight Committee Monday.
The former associate of the first Son provided bombshell testimony indicating that President Biden interjected nearly two dozen times on phone calls in impersonal meetings with his son’s business associates while serving as vice president. As a means to sell the brand. Here benny Johnson, breaking Hunter biden’s. Former business partner. Debbie Archer. Testified VP. Biden was put on speakerphone 20 plus time to sell the brand. In business discussions, those familiar with Archer’s testimony indicate his claim contradict the President’s appowell that he had nothing to do with his son’s lucrative business dealings in 2019.
Joe insisted he had never discussed with his son or his brother or anyone else anything having to do with their business, period. More recently, the President angrily denied the contents of a text message that seemed to outline one of these instances when he was in the room when his son was conducting business or NC research. Reporter how involved were you in your son’s Chinese shakedown text message? Were you sitting there? Were you involved? Biden? No, I wasn’t.
Reporter were you? Biden yelling no. Turley the normally measured George Washington University law professor seemed taken aback by the Archer testimony declared that President Biden had outright lied about his influent family remarking on Joe’s claims he stayed out of Hunter’s business, turley said that’s clearly false. I mean, these are accounts of almost two dozen calls made with his associates, some of whom are the most corrupt figures in Europe, where the vice president would call in.
We have to find out the full story here, he urged. I think this is shaping up to be one of the greatest corruption scandals in the history of Washington. And that says a lot. Charlie Kirk tweets professor Jonathan Turley is stunned by the Biden family influence peddling scheme following the Devon Archer testimony. What we now know, quite frankly, is that the president has been lying. I think this is shaping up to be one of the greatest corruption scandals in Washington history.
Representative Dan Goldman admitted that Archer’s testimony indicated Biden had been in contact with Hunter’s business partners, a clear contradiction of previous claims. Goldman, however, speaking for the Democrats, concluded that Biden only spoke about casual niceties the weather, for example and never spoke about business. Like many people, Hunter spoke with his father every day and would often put his father occasionally would have pawed on to say hello to whomever he happened to be caught at dinner with.
And Mr. Archer clarified that was sometimes people they were trying to do business with and it was sometimes friends or other social engagement. He downplayed. As he described it. It was all casual niceties, the weather. What’s going on? Goldman continued, there wasn’t a single conversation about any of the business dealings Hunter had here’s. Benny again. Representative Democratic Representative Daniel Goldman just confirmed that Joe Biden coordinated with Hunter Biden business partners regularly.
What were they talking about? According to a sweaty, visibly shaken Goldman, just the weather. Okay, guys, nothing to see here. Just move on. These aren’t the droids you’re looking for. Sure thing. Just the weather. You know, the way members of the mob discuss the National League standings before they eventually break out the baseball bats. According to reported photograph, visitor logs, and other documentation, president Joe personally met with at least 14 of Hutter’s business associates over 16 occasions between 2010 and 2018, including an associate from China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and Mexico.
Bouncing off turley’s claims Biden’s lies are an indication that he knows his actions were at best wrong, at worst criminal. And those lies have been incredibly frequent. President Biden claimed his family never made money from Chinese entities when bank records show they have. He claimed Hunter’s laptop is Russian, disinformation when it isn’t, and now claims he had nothing to do with other businesses. So it continued to fall apart.
It doesn’t get much more corrupt than this. Scott, your thoughts? Well, I think the other nations of the world that have had relations and secret clandestine payments and cover ups and things like that, it’s in their best interest to come clean and say, you know, you know, each country should name people and say, we’re going to hand over to you the evidence of Joe Biden and Barack Obama when he was vice President.
With regards to Uranium One or any deals whatsoever, we’re showing you what you have because it’s in the world’s interest for Biden to be exposed and to be hung by the neck until dead because he’s trying to hang the world’s neck. He’s trying to lead war in Ukraine, war against China, to create the distraction, to hide from all of this. So the world has to come in and help put out these smoke bombs by saying, here’s proof.
Yeah, we were in business. We bought uranium from him. We did this. We bribed him, we gave him, here, here’s the bank account numbers. The world should turn over this evidence to say, look at what you have, and it’s a national security threat. So the impeachment again, I disagree with Rand Paul saying, well, we shouldn’t maybe impeach bullshit. This is the time and no other time and no other person deserves an impeachment than a Venturian candidate like Joe Biden, who has been getting, what, $50 million, as Barrett Romo has been saying, from China and who knows what else.
This is exactly, precisely and absolutely the only time that you must impeach the moment you find this, because it is a threat to the national security of the United States. It is not a political puppet show or drama theater. It is the American constitutional and the American government. And every day that goes by, we are risking this lunatic from having other lunatics who are trying to keep him in order, keep him in power, to give the mirage that he’s in power while they do God knows what other blackmailing and black operations.
I’ve seen it. I’ve seen 19,000 Swiss bank accounts going to Obama, going to Biden, going to Hillary Clinton going in, eric Holder, Lanny Brewer covered it all up, took 4000 bank accounts and then the rest that the other 15,000 bank accounts were used to do black operations and God knows how many different countries. That’s part of the legacy of Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama. Jim. Oh, I completely agree.
And moreover, if you had impeachment, you see what real criminality looks like, because the amount of evidence they could induce a contrast with a phony trumped up trials being brought against the Donald. I think there’s great merit in moving forward. And the Constitution is very explicit about the types of offenses. And this is squarely right there, right centered on the target. Meanwhile, Turley has revealed the one charge that he believes the White House is most worried about.
According to a report by Axios, the discussion about her question about the agreement whether it protected Hunter from future prosecution under other laws became so intense, there were not one, but two recesses. During one of these, Judge Norieka dropped a bombshell by questioning whether the deal could shield Hunter from potential prosecution under the Foreign Agent Registration Act, among others. That’s the kind of thing the White House definitely doesn’t want to hear.
Here we have downhall. Turley identifies the one charge the White House most fears against Hunter oversight committee. Today, the DOJ revealed Hunter Biden is under investigation for being a foreign agent. Here’s Alexander Dayton. Early Hunter Biden’s judge raised the question of White House most viewers was he a foreign agent and for what purpose? But it gets even juicier. The DOJ prosecutor Leo Wise mentioned during the hearing there was an ongoing investigation related to Hunter.
When pressed for more information, Wise said he couldn’t say. Talking about leaving us hanging, you could almost feel the tension in the air. Professor Turley added more spice to the mix, saying the whole situation looks like a poorly planned wedding where both the bride and groomer having second thoughts. He pointed out that DOJ wanted to close the case and cab the investigation, but they did not want to admit in public in court that it was over.
Meanwhile, Hunter’s legal team had been under the impression the plea agreement would close out the case and nothing else would be investigated. Looks like someone didn’t get a memo. Turley also highlighted the elephant in the room, rather the White House’s worst nightmare. The judge’s question about Hunter potentially being a foreign agent hit a nerve. If he was indeed a foreign agent, who was he working for? The answer is pretty obvious.
This opens a whole can of worms, including investigation into tax accounts, potential influence peddling. Safe to say, this plea deal is teetering on the edge of collapse. Everyone in Washington is in complete shock. I could hardly believe it myself when I was chatting with members on the Hill. So now the big question is, what happens next? It’s like we’re all stuck at that awkward point in the wedding where they are having second thoughts, and we’re left wondering, how do we get here? And where do we go now? I can only imagine a chaos that must be ensuing behind closed doors.
One thing’s for sure, though this Hunter plea deal has become a hot mess nobody saw coming. Buckle up, folks, because I have a feeling things are about to get even more interesting. And he got it right. And you introduced the show with this very searing explanation of what was going on. Scott here’s another now turley suggesting Biden’s possible out the break the glass option, pardon Hunter and withdraw from the 2024 election blows my column in the messenger what I call Biden’s break the glass option after the disaster in Delaware.
After the column ran, Fox News asked White House votes for Kareem Jean Pierre about the possibility of a pardon for Haunter. Jean Pierre cut him off and responded unequivocally, no. I hope it’s true. But it would have been more assuring to come from someone who did not clearly misrepresent the president’s earlier denial just a day earlier and change his long standing position. The president previously denied a series of facts that have been proven.
Knowing the fact his son did make money in China and that Joe Biden himself did have knowledge of and interact with his son’s business dealings, the real question is whether the fix in this case will fail. Leave the president with a pardon behind the glass. Here’s the call out. The collapse of the Hunter Biden plea bargain has left many in Washington shock. After all, this is a city that knows how to fix a fight after five years, dubai corruption scandal was supposed to die with a vacuous flea market and no jail time, most everyone was in on the fix, from members of Congress to the media to the prosecutors.
The problem was the one notable omission judge Mary Ellen Norieka of the US. District Court for the District of Delaware, the sentence hearing was a moment that made the Hindenburg disaster look like a seamless landing. Norieka asked a basic question on the implications of the agreement, and the entire deal immediately collapsed. Now the DOJ is in a bind. He could not admit in the hearing that Hunter could escape future liability for a host of uncharged crimes.
Yet when a defendant backs out of a generous plea deal, federal prosecutors ordinarily will pursue all the available charges and jail time. While President Joe once declared in more colorful terms, no one messes with a Biden, the Justice Department may now find it has no choice. It could be forced to actually treat Hunter like an ordinary citizen. The debate in Debacle in Delaware could still result in a plea deal.
The parties have a month to work things out. Most judges sign off on deals given the discretion afforded to the executive branch on criminal charging decisions. They just need to be clear about the terms, and clarity is something neither side seemed eager to establish publicly during Wednesday’s hearing. However, an agreement would require prosecutors either to fight to preserve the sweetheart deal, one without additional future charges, or to proceed as they would in most cases with a full prosecution.
That would include obvious potential charges under the Foreign Agent Registration Act. Rieka forced the Justice Department to admit it could still charge Biden as an unregistered foreign agent. That was a charge used against Trump campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, where the similarities between the cases are striking. It took little time for the DOJ to use a charge against Manafort. Yet in the Hunter case, five years have passed, and the DOJ still seemed mired and owned out over applying the same standard to the president’s son.
A ferret charge could further expose Hunter’s alleged influence peddling operations with what investigators say were millions in foreign payments from a virtual rogues gallery of foreign officials. DOJ would also face pressure to seek the same long jail sentence given to Manafort. He was sentenced to 73 months of imprisonment, which included the statutory max 60 months for a conspiracy to violate Farah. That same year, by contrast, political consultant W.
Samuel Patton pled guilty to lobbying and consulting on behalf of the opposition Bloc, a Ukrainian political party, and received instead 36 months of not jail, but probation. That’s not even including potential felony charges for the original gun violation, money laundering or other crimes. If DOJ were to show the same aggressive effort toward Hunter that was shown to figures like Manafort, hunter could be looking at the real possibility of years in jail.
There is, however, the ultimate break the glass option. If Biden and their supporters cannot rig the process, joe could pardon his son and then announce he will not run for real action. Facing an impeachment inquiry, low public support, a son in the legal dock, biden could use the case to close out his political career. Of course, a Biden would be what I consider to be another abuse of the pardon power for personal benefit.
President Bill Clinton at least waited to the end of his second term to pardon his half brother. Biden could do the same by acknowledging the pardoning of his son is a form of raw self dealing. However, as he has said throughout the scandal, he loves his son and blames his crimes on his struggle with addiction and grieving. With that, Biden could bow out of the auction without admitting, as many on both sides are saying, that old age has taken its toll on his mental and physical capacity.
He could end his political career with an act as a father, which some would condemn but most would understand. That would clear the way for a new generation of Democrat candidates who would have a better chance of defeating Donald Trump or an alternative Republican candidate. President Biden could even give Hunter a preemptive or prospective pardon that would effectively end any federal investigation, though the pardon would need to cover the waterfront of possible charges by resigning and becoming a lame doc, biden would undermine at congressional impeachment calls.
It would allow his own allies to declare the scandal over Biden taking responsibility by giving up a second term in office. Of course, there is no guarantee congressional investigation would end. Even if such a move dampened the demand for an impeachment, it would not likely stop Republicans from pursuing answers about the officially handling of this investigation and claims of political interference. Yet any damage would be contained by Biden offering himself up as a sin eater for his family.
Democrat candidates would likely not face backlash for their opposition to investigating the scandal. Their chances of retaking the House could be substantially increased. Likewise, the media would not have to face mounting evidence it has steadfastly ignored for years. The pardon and apology approach might appeal to Biden not only as an effort to convert Bison to virtue, but to justify his withdrawal from the election as a selfless act.
Everyone in Washington would win, except, of course, the public. The Biden would keep alleged millions in influent peddling profits. Hunter would not even have to pay his full taxes. Members of Congress and the media could avoid taking responsibility for burying the reports of corruption. That is what is called a happy ending in Washington, DC. Scott, your thoughts. Well, Jim, in my humble opinion, that article theorizing or hypothesizing a possible pardon and Biden stepping down.
I think that’s nonsense. I think that whole article is completely wrong. I don’t think the person writing it has ever served in government, ever worked in Washington. They may have been outside in a journalist, but I’ve been in the machine. I was in the Republican Party and the think tanks and all that. Look, all that is nonsense. That is never going to happen. And if it does, I’ll buy some ruby slippers, click my heels, and go to Oz.
It’s not going to happen because it’s Pollyanni ish here’s. What would happen if I took that model, let me make that design, and make it into a real car. What would happen is Joe Biden would pardon his son and say, f you, all the rest of you Republican pieces of shit, you’re a bunch of savages. My son did nothing wrong, but I’m pardoning him because I’m not going to allow you to tear the country down.
He would stand his ground, and all of his lunatic Democrats would cheer him on. They have no soul. They have no morality. They have no righteousness. They have no ethics. These are zombies. The Democrats. No one seems to understand that. They have no moral accountability, so they don’t care about truth or goodness. They celebrate evil, so they would celebrate that, say, yeah, pardon him and say, screw you.
So I could see Biden pardoning him, saying screw you. And here comes what we’ve been talking about before. So he says, screw you. I’m pardoning my son. And then he gets shot, killed by a Trump supporter or maybe a Russian or something and Biden is executed as a martyr. Then there’s the martyrs sympathy and there’s political capital and you see how those mean Republicans are. And then Kamala Harris tries to go up and Gavin Newsom’s, her VP or Biden says screw you.
They kill Kamala Harris and then he says screw you again. I’m putting in Gavin newsom. And then just as Gavin Newsom signs his signature, the zombie drone Biden is shot and killed too. And then Gavin Newsom goes into the presidency without an election and then he appoints Michelle Obama possibly and then suspension of the election. FEMA is hereby in charge because we’ve been hit by a nuclear blast from Russia or something else.
The Democrats are going to put all their chips in. They’re probably going to assassinate Biden and Kamala Harris to put in Newsom and move Michelle. But they are not ever going to just fade away. This naivety in this author thinking that, well, it’s know no one wins except bullshit. Look, this is a tug of war, okay? You have on one side the atheist rainbow flag transbender demoniacs and then on the other side you have Trump and the Republicans and the conservatives and it’s a tug of war.
Who is going to be pulled into hell and DeSantis and all these other fools are running around trying to play other games at the circus, at the carnival, at the state fair. They’re squirting guns in the clown faces or petting the donkey’s butt but all of us are going this is a tug of war for the soul of the country and Trump is pulling we have to get behind him and help pull these bastards into the hellfire.
There’s no other game or competition except a tug of war and they’re going to try and do every devious scheme of guilt trip and manipulation to try and distract us as they pull this and try and pull us into hell. So I think that’s the way we look at it, it’s a tug of war and we have to get on Trump’s side and pull this not for him, but for all of us.
Jim, go back to you. Well, Scott, I mean it’s fascinating to get an alternative view. The author of course, was Jonathan Turley, the same constitutional law professor whose reports we’ve been following. Yeah, I’m not a big fan of Turley to be honest with you. He’s a little effeminate some ways and he didn’t do anything when I sent him a letter about shell game, he did write me back, but he didn’t do anything.
So I’m a little know, not really too fond of Turley, but that’s my opinion. Go ahead. Well, let’s just have a little update on what we reported before about the death of the Obama chef. We know it was very fishy. We know there was an anonymous call claiming that he had been battleboating and disappeared under the water. I no longer think that was authentic. I think that was to change the location in the time of his death, that he was already dead, that he and Brock had an encounter in the home.
In the section here, you see where the name and the location from which it was made were altered. This is by the pond, not from the source. From the phone call, we know he was a good swimmer. Now get this back. On November 3 of 2011, Barack Obama accused my two men of inappropriate behavior. This was sexual harassment of other men by Barack Obama when he was ahead of the Harvard Law Review.
The two men actually were given settlements, financial settlements, and left the Law Review as a partial. There was a third former editor who also lodged a complaint. I believe that may have happened here with a chef who is a handsome guy. Defensive wounds obama spotting golfing with bandage figures and possible wounded eye. Day after chef’s death, images have appeared online of Barack golfing with people raising questions. He wear bandages on his left dominant hand, may or may not have a small wound under his left eye.
Here’s a post from Twitter. The images, which came from an article in Daily Mail, show the bandages have people speculating about the dark spot. The latter is questionable, certainly either wouldn’t come out in public or would wear makeup if they’re trying to hide scientists’wishes. But who knows? I believe he was trying to act normal. After all. This comes days after his seuss chief Tafari Campbell was found dead.
According to Gateway Ponda, dressed in a green polo shirt and white shorts, barack Obama was seen engaged in a route of golf at an exclusive Vineyard golf club. The former president noticeably bearing banshee’s fingers caused speculation. Online citizen journalist Travis of Flint, Michigan, wrote just days after his personal chef and friend died in a very mysterious paddleboarding accident, rock appears to have injured fingers in a black eye.
We still don’t know who the other person was, but Obama loves to paddleboard. I think we can all guess what happened at this point. The Obamas aren’t the Clintons who racked up a huge list of people close to them who have died mysteriously. Then again, perhaps the Obamas are just much better at covering their tracks. Scott, I think that it happened at the house that the girls may have been aware of what happened.
They were immediately flown out of Dodge. I think Brock was putting the body in the water. He was the other paddleboarder, but the key was Michelle calling in to give a different location and time. He was already dead, but she’s saying he was on paddleboarding and he went in the water and he didn’t come back up. All this is being covered up by the Edgarton Police Department, sad to say, but I’m telling you, this story is not going away.
Well, Jim, how you drown someone in your house is you waterboard them. You put them at a 45 degree angle. You put a wet towel over their face and their nose and their mouth, and you pour a five gallon jug of water slowly over their air passages, and they ingest the water and they drown. That’s how waterboarding can be used to drown someone and kill them. That could have happened to him in the bathroom, anywhere else.
And that’s where a detective has to step in and make inquiries and question. Where were you, Mr. Obama? Where did you get those bandaged fingers? Let me look at the house. Let me look at the bathroom. Let me look for the wet me. Where were you, Michelle Obama? Where were you, secret Service chief in charge of the house? Where was everybody in the map when this guy died? Because you can tell by the body temperature insurance stuff.
When he died, where he died, were there drugs in his system? This whole thing is a chapoquitic, but it smells because of the lack of investigation. Jim? Well, Scott, my own suspicion is he wasn’t waterboard, he didn’t actually drown, but that Obama asphyxiated him when they had this altercation, which means that the key evidence, and it would be either way, will be autopsy, because the signs of having drowned are very distinctive and would be completely other than from asphyxiation.
So I believe that will prove to be a major tell. But they can bring in even prominent medical examiners who might nevertheless be induced to cover it up. I think we can have very little grounds for faith that it’s going to be adequately exposed, but Americans are so used to murder mysteries. I probably watch 10,000 easily by conservative estimate, and I say the pieces fall into place. This is one that does not add up.
It appears to be a very nice case of perhaps accidental killing, but the fact is, then he should have come clean called Nine One. Explain what happened when he got the party, I believe to be Michelle making a phone call to give a false location. Time of death speaks of a cover up out of consciousness. Remember, too, there are a lot of perverts who like to play asphyxiation sex games where they asphyxiate and choke the person while they’re engaged in sexual activity.
And I wouldn’t be surprised if Barack Obama and Michael Lebanon Robinson were having some sexual twist with this guy and perhaps strangle him that way as part of the sexual perversity they do there’s asphyxiation sex games, things like that. I wouldn’t be surprised. But again, that’s very easily to determine because you take the body, you do a DNA analysis. Was there any semen in him? Was there other hair or anything else that doesn’t easily disappear if you’re willing to do an autopsy, where is the autopsy of the body? And where’s the examination of Barack Obama’s body and Michelle Obama’s body and everybody else that was there.
Where’s the analysis of the security tapes? Where’s everything that a decent detective would ask for? And I think this is chapoquitic, we’ll see where it goes. But I think the real thing is we’re in a tug of war with Trump being indicted as a cover up to try and escape the real treason of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden. And I predict everything is going to kick into high gear after Labor Day.
That’s always when the political season starts. That’s when the impeachment will get official. That’s when they’ll have all sorts of cannons firing, amicus briefs firing, all sorts of other things going is after September. So keep doing the great work, Jim. You’re one of the few that really is providing the intel and the material that people need to know and understand this stuff. So we applaud you. Thank you, Scott.
I’m so delighted to join you for these shows. Well, thank you for joining us on Globalfreedomtv. com Great Awakenings. Please contact us if you have any thoughts and go to Jim Fetzer’s blog spot to read his blogs and his videos and his materials and his articles to get his book. Jim, give us your website again. It’s Jameshfetzer. org, but BitChute channel. Jim Fetzer and my most recent books on Paul’s flags are@moonrockbooks.
com amen. Jim Fetzer. We’ll have you on again next week. God bless you and we will see you tomorrow. Good night. SA. .
Author
