Summary
➡ The text discusses the concept of contagion and viral infections, particularly chickenpox. It emphasizes that the person making a claim must justify it, and it’s okay to say you don’t know the cause. The text suggests that there’s no scientific evidence proving contagion is real or that viruses cause illnesses like chickenpox. Instead, it proposes that symptoms like fever or rash could be the body’s way of eliminating harmful substances, and that focusing on real, observable phenomena rather than unseen fears can improve health.
➡ The speaker discusses the reliability of antibody tests, suggesting that they may not be as specific or accurate as believed. They argue that these tests, which are used to detect diseases like measles, chickenpox, lupus, and others, don’t actually prove the presence of these diseases. Instead, they suggest that these tests might just measure the amount of tissue breakdown in the body, which could be caused by any illness, not necessarily the one being tested for. The speaker also advises against traditional medical education due to its high cost and the potential for misinformation.
➡ The text discusses the challenges of setting up a medical practice and suggests that learning through new biology curriculum courses might be a better option. It also emphasizes the importance of self-study and learning from personal experiences. The author shares his personal approach to health, which involves listening to his body and adjusting his lifestyle accordingly, rather than relying on regular medical check-ups or tests. He also highlights the value of getting feedback from trusted individuals and sharing personal health stories with others.
➡ The speaker questions the effectiveness of cancer screening and the historical narrative of human technological progression. They suggest that ancient architecture, like the Taj Mahal, mirrors cellular structures and may have been designed to harness energy from the environment, implying the use of unknown technology. They propose that these structures could have been used for healing, challenging our current understanding of biology and medicine. They encourage us to question accepted beliefs and learn from the past.
Transcript
It doesn’t seem like you ever win, but I occasionally break down and do that. So I’m going to answer that question today with a little clip, a video clip that was I got from our friend Mike Winner from Alpha Vedic. And so I think it explained things. I haven’t. I don’t know this guy. I haven’t vetted what he says, although I know a fair amount about what he’s talking about. And most of us who have looked into the whole sovereignty thing know about this. But I thought he presented elections in a very succinct light. So let’s start with this.
So we have to share the sound here, and hopefully you can see it. I’m going to keep it small just because I worry that I’ll lose it if I don’t. So I’m going to keep it small. And I think. Here’s his Telegram. Don’t slap snooze.net again, I don’t know this fella, but I thought this. I just saw it this morning from Mike Winner, and here’s Mike Winter’s subscribestar, if you want to check that out. And here’s what he has to say. Why would I vote for President of the United States when, According to Title 28 of the US Code, the United States is a corporation? And I don’t know about you, but personally, I don’t vote for president of any corporation.
I don’t vote for President of Dick’s Sporting Goods. I don’t vote for president of the Cheesecake Factory, and I don’t vote for president of the corporate United States, which is doing business as a government. To be specific, they’re doing business as a de facto government, a government that has assumed a character very closely resembling that of a lawful government. So it is not a lawful government. It just resembles one. It’s like the preeminent Journey cover band, almost Journey. They kind of look like Journey. They sort of sound like Journey. For all intents and Purposes, they are almost Journey.
However, at the end of the day, when it really comes down to it, these four creeps ain’t Journey. And this ain’t a lawful government. It’s not lawfully entitled to recognition. Yet nevertheless, it has supplanted and displaced the government du jour, which is the true and lawful government that has been cut off from power. In other words, a corporate United States whose only obligation is to make a profit for its stockholders, has established itself in place of the actual government. It’s as if the U2 cover band 2U, who provides a precise emulation of the actual band, became the actual band.
It’s like they just snuck backstage, beat Bono to death with a ball peen hammer, and poisoned the rest of the band with an expired can of sardines. Then they proceeded to walk on stage, perform, and finish the rest of the tour as you too. And they get away with it because most of you just keep supporting them. You keep buying tickets to their show. You keep casting your vote. This is how a phony, fraudulent, de facto government exercises power and control. They receive habitual obedience from the bulk of the community. And that’s what voting is. Every four years, out of habit, a bulk of you get together and consent to an illegitimate government.
With every vote, you recognize the authority of a business. Why? For what reason? You don’t recognize the authority of other businesses. You don’t let the Cheesecake Factory establish laws and fine you for failure to finish a full serving of jambalaya pasta. You don’t let them take you to cheesecake Court and say, hey, we notice you haven’t eaten avocado egg rolls in the last 90 days. And that’s illegal. So here are your options. You can either get sentenced to prison, or you can get sentenced to 7,000 slices of vanilla bean banana cream peanut butter fudge ripple. Would you put up with that? Or would you put your foot down and challenge the very idea that a corporation can have authority over your private life? You gotta ask yourself, do you really want to keep voting for president of a corporation? And if the answer is yes, then I say go all in campaign door to door for the president of Jiffy Lube.
Riot in the streets over the rigged election at Oshkosh Bagosh. Because it’s basically the same thing that you’re already doing. Okay, you gotta wake up. Don’t slap, snooze. Okay, I think that pretty much says it all. I made us partial list of the things that I’m not sure there is a legitimate government by the way. But anyways, the partial list of things you didn’t get to vote on because there was really no choice. So one would be the slaughter of people, including women and children, who did nothing to you and that you financed. Another one would be the confis confiscation under the threat of violence, that is to say, putting you in a cage of between 20 and 50% of your annual income, wages, things you earn in a year.
It’s otherwise known as taxes, which is the violent confiscation. And you didn’t get to vote on whether you agree with a monopolization of the control and creation of the currency to a single entity aligned with the government called the Federal Reserve. And of course, there was many more things that you didn’t get to vote on. And finally, just. And get off this subject because this wasn’t what I was meant to talk about. But if they actually do what they say and the winner says, there was some claims as to what they would do. Here’s some of them, not just a very small list, one of which is they would create tariffs which would have the effect of making pretty much all the goods that you would be subjected to.
The subject to these tariffs, poorer quality and more expensive. So that would degrade everybody’s standard of living. They would also allegedly make the vaccines safer for everyone. That’s a direct quote. They would make the regulatory agencies less corrupt. Good luck with that. And more powerful, more able to regulate the products that we can ingest or inject into us, which may seem like a good idea, but that’s like the fox guarding the hen house. And you wonder who they would get in there to, who would be less corrupt. And finally they would appoint the guy who’s the head of neural link, I think, who wants to wire our brains to computers to be in charge of efficiency for government.
And I think that’s a euphemism for making it more effective in tyrannizing us. So that’s what I think about the election. Not everybody probably agrees with me on that. It’s the whole thing, obviously, is very discouraging. And one has to wonder where we go from here. And we obviously have a lot of work ahead of us to rid ourselves of this tyranny that we’re all exposed to. Okay, so the subject of today, what happened at the Weston Price conference, and the main thing I want to focus on, because I only went to, besides the new biology and my own talks, I only went to one other person’s talks, and that’s Manell Ballister, a friend of mine, cardiologist from Spain.
And I would really encourage anybody who’s interested in a different and different view of the heart. You can get the tapes from the conference. I’m not sure where, but if you go to Wise Traditions Conference, maybe we can put that in the show notes. You can get the tapes and it’s well worth getting copies or listening to. Manel’s two talks on the heart. The first one, he went through the. The real anatomy of the heart, which is far different than the anatomy that we were taught in medical school, and essentially in another way proving that the heart can’t possibly be pumping the blood, that it’s a very amazingly designed vortexing system.
And second of all, the second talk was more about the heart as an energy device. And therefore healing of the heart has to be through energy means. So I’m not going to say much more about that, except I would encourage again, people to check those out. Manel was one of the speakers at our True Healing conference, probably almost four years ago. So I thought the most important thing is it was wonderful to meet so many people. And I don’t know, maybe somewhere between 50 and 100 people came up to me over the course of the two and a half, three days, introduced themselves and told me a little bit about their lives.
And a lot of people still had questions. And I thought I would go over these questions, not so much just to give an answer, but to give the. A way of thinking about these questions. So my goal is always to get you to know how to think about answering these questions, so you don’t need me to answer the questions. Once, you know, the thinking process, the rest just kind of falls into place. And so each one or most of them, some of them will have principles that I think are important here. So obviously, as you can imagine, and most of the people who came up to me have heard me speak, so they’re not new, but so this is reflective of the questions that are still out there, even though in some ways I’ve been over them millions of times, or at least it feels like that.
But the question is, you know, people say, what causes chicken pox? They tell me the story of their child went to a chicken pox party and then they got sick with chicken pox, similar symptoms as the person who had chickenpox at the event or the party. And then maybe some, not all of the other children in the house get a cold or chicken pox or it could be measles or it could be mumps or and sometimes it was, there was a herpes infection which I think I caught from my girlfriend, either on the lips or the genital.
So what do I think causes this? So there’s two principles that you should immediately go into when you hear this question. The first is the fundamental rule of scientific thinking is the person making the claim has to justify their claim and you are not responsible for giving an alternative hypothesis for the cause of the claim. Science is about determining through experimentation and rational thinking the causes of different phenomena in nature. But you are perfectly allowed to say you don’t necessarily know the cause. Then if you want, you can speculate and even say this is something that would need to have experimentation.
So I would encourage you, if you get asked this question or confronted with this question, or even if the question is only in your own mind, stick to the claim that’s out there. In other words, the claim with chickenpox is that there is a so called virus which has certain characteristics, size, shape, proteins, genetic material, which is the cause of this illness called chicken pox. That is a so called scientific claim. And that this virus spreads from one person to another resulting in the phenomena we call contagion. So that is the claim that you are trying to address.
And before you get into a different hypothesis as to the cause, it’s important to investigate and I would say even debunk that claim. So the next step in this process, and this is crucial and key, is to separate what you see from what you think happened. In other words, what is sometimes called observables, what did you actually observe versus what you assume to have happened or assume to be true. So in this case, let’s keep going with the chicken pox story. What you saw happen is one child, say at the house your child visited, who has a certain set of symptoms and then you observed your child going to that house and then having similar, usually not identical.
It’s like sometimes there’s a fever and sometimes there’s a quote, ear infection and sometimes there’s mucus and sometimes there’s a cough and sometimes it’s only a vesicular skin rash. And sometimes the skin rash is not even vesicular, meaning bubbles at all. So it’s not identical. But you could say you have similar symptoms and that’s all you see. You don’t see a virus, you don’t see it spread from one person to another. You don’t see anything passed from one person to another. You, you don’t see any of that. That’s not something that we can observe. Particularly the virus part.
So you see one person getting sick and then another person getting sick who was in physical proximity with similar symptoms, same time, same place, similar symptoms. So that’s what you observe. Then you generalize that phenomena and ask yourself and the person you’re talking to the question, is it true that if one or more animal or person has same symptoms, same time, same place, therefore A, it was caused by a virus or B, even more, more general, that something was passed from one animal or person to the next. And that’s obviously gets into the rat example. You have a rat, 100 rats in your basement, you put rat poison, next day 10 rats are dead, same time, same place, same symptoms and so on.
So that observation of similar, of similar symptoms, same time, same place does not lead to the conclusion that contagion was the cause, period. That’s just an observation which has many causes which therefore can only be figured out by doing proper scientific experiments. Meaning you have to have a dependent variable. Child gets sick with certain symptoms, an independent variable, is this caused by this exposure to this person? Now as we’ve said, this has been done in a scientific way for many, many so called viral infections, so called contagious illnesses, chicken pox, colds, flus, kennel cough, measles, et cetera.
And the conclusion of these hundreds of studies is basically always the same, which is there is no actual scientific evidence in controlled studies that contagion is an actual phenomenon. Therefore, according to scientific way of thinking, that hypothesis has been falsified. So that’s not what happened. Now the virus one is even worse because no virus has ever been shown to exist. And I don’t want to get into that whole thing, but there has never been a virus found in any lesion or fluid of anybody with chickenpox. So you can’t even have an independent variable that is a virus to test.
So at this point then you know that it’s not a contagious event and it’s not chickenpox, it’s not caused by a virus. Now when I say a contagious event, there could be common exposures, there could even be things that are omitted, emanating or something from one person which stimulate a reaction from another person. So there’s a lot of other possibilities, but the main phenomena of contagion and viral infection, those have been falsified. So then you can say, well what could be happening? And you can then make a guess or a hypothesis that when you see what are called acute symptoms like fever, rash, mucus, et cetera, then what Your you can understand or you can hypothesize, that’s a better word, that the child is eliminating something which is harmful to their organism.
You can test that theory in various ways and in particularly when you see a elimination through the skin. That’s your body’s way of discharging things in natural medicine historically that have not been able to be processed properly by the liver and through the bowels. So that is a hypothesis as to what the specific agent or exposure or energetic phenomena that the person was exposed to that we don’t really know. There’s lots of different theories on that. And I would say that at this point they remain theories and they’re good enough theories that can give you a guideline as to way to proceed with the treatment of that child, I.
E. Help them by not putting any more toxic stuff in them, which is usually food and toxic water, and then helping the elimination of whatever waste they’re trying to get rid of through helping their bowels move. And maybe bass for helping the elimination through the skin and maybe putting different sorts of charcoal paste or bentonite clay to help the elimination of whatever needs to come out through the skin. And you can start putting together a program based on the idea that even though you don’t know the specific cause in any individual situation, that’s generally what’s happening.
And having done that for 40 years and having every case of chicken pox and measles and rashes turn out well, I feel pretty confident that even though I may not know the actual individual cause in any situation, that the whole thing works out pretty well. And it’s a pretty reliable guide for how to proceed. And again, the most important thing is it seems like once you rid yourself of the contagion viral disproven hypothesis way of thinking in. In a funny sort of way, and we talked about this in our doctors group the other day, people seem to get sick far less often and the sickness is far less severe.
So it actually helps you to understand not necessarily what the problem is, but the problem is not a deadly virus that you caught from Aunt Bessie or from the child next door. That’s not the way it happened. You don’t need to be afraid of the world. You don’t need to be afraid of viruses that are going to kill you. You don’t need to be afraid of unseen things. That gets into the pumpkin story. Once you do go down that road, as they say, your goose is partly cooked. So it’s amazing how much better your health will be once you rid yourself of unnecessary make believe fears and only focus on that which is real and you can actually observe and hopefully experience and test for yourself.
And that was a, I think a big part of the theme in the new biology part of the Wise Traditions conference. What do we actually see what is real? And let’s get away from all these make believe concepts. Okay. The next thing that I kept getting asked and interestingly I was my grand children from Asher, my son were there and my, I think she’s nine, almost ten year old granddaughter Mia. And we would be walking around sometimes and sometimes we’d go for a walk and she’d say, grandpa, you can’t go 10 steps without ask somebody asking you a question.
And I’m not sure that we actually counted 10 steps, but it was pretty close, which is fine because that’s really one of the big reasons I’m there is to try to answer as many people’s questions as I can in those few days. But a lot of the questions had to do with I had a lab test and that told me I had either a history of a measles infection or I’d had chicken pox, or I have lupus, I have this autoimmune disease, or I was suffering from some other infection. And you’re saying these things don’t prove, don’t demonstrate that at all.
So what do these tests actually mean? Again, the strategy here or the way of going about this is let’s actually investigate the claim as to the foundational science of these tests. Now most of them, in fact, I would say pretty much all of them are antibody tests. In other words, I was given an antibody test that told me I have a herpes infection, or I had an antibody test that told me I have rheumatoid arthritis, or I had an antibody test that showed that I have hiv, therefore I’m going to die of aids. Now we’ve talked about this a lot as the problem of antibody specificity.
There’s even a deeper problem which is nobody has ever isolated an antibody intact and purified it from any biological fluid of any living human or animal. So to a large extent, even these molecules are theoretical concepts or constructs. And what that what you’re looking at. So again, what is the observable? You take biological fluid like secretions or blood, you mix it with a bunch of chemicals and you get a color or light reaction. That’s what you see. And then the claim is that it means that color reaction or that light reaction tells you there is a specific antibody.
That specific meaning the antibody reacts to a specific protein that is antigen. And that protein, antigen is specific to a certain virus which is specific to a certain disease. Let me say that again, so everybody gets it. The observable part of that is you take like your blood or your saliva or chickenpox lesion or a herpes lesion, you mix it with a bunch of chemicals and you either get a light or a chemical reaction. That’s what you see. You don’t see an antibody, you don’t see an antigen, you don’t see a virus, you don’t see the disease, you don’t see any of those.
You see chemicals with something from you creating a light or chemical reaction. Now in order for that to be specific to a certain antigen, you would have had to done a few tests to make sure that that’s true. And again, I’ve been over this, but one of the tests would be take those chemicals and mix it with some, the secretions or blood of somebody that you know doesn’t have that illness, doesn’t have that virus, doesn’t have that antigen and see if you get a reaction. That would be one sort of control. Now the next thing is you would do it with somebody who’s equally as sick.
Like they have the breakdown of their skin. And now not you claim from measles or chicken pox, but from allergic eczema. So there shouldn’t be any virus, there shouldn’t be any antigens. And then you mix the same antibody and see if you get a chemical reaction then you would take a different set of antibodies, maybe 10 different ones. This is not in an individual case, but this should be the background of the research. So you take 10 different antibodies and you mix those with the fluid of people who you think have the illness or not and see if only the one that’s so called specific actually has a chemical reaction or lights up.
And there are many other different controls that could be done to prove that. And again, and I would refer you to Mike Stone and the Baileys and many people have looked at this molecular detection scam. And the bottom line is, and you can also vary the conditions, vary the chemicals with the same so called antibody. The bottom line is this has never been proven that there is such a thing as antibody specificity. Therefore you cannot claim that there is a specific antigen, therefore you can’t claim it comes from a specific virus. Therefore you cannot claim that it means you have a certain illness.
So essentially the test is mostly meaningless in that it does not implicate or prove either specific Disease specific, virus specific, bacteria specific antigen reacting to a specific antibody that is across the board. So I told that to a lot of people and they still said, but it must mean something, or how come sometimes I have antibodies or antigen reactions and sometimes they don’t, and sometimes I have it and other people don’t. Sometimes they have it and I don’t. What are we, what are they testing there? Now? It could be that that’s just a random, meaningless result.
There is, however, another possibility that basically the more sick you are in any kind of way, meaning you have degenerating, dying, breaking down tissue, the more different proteins and different substances will come out in your secretions, and therefore the more likely you will have a positive reaction on a light or chemical reaction. And this we see with, say, the AIDS tests. So you see ant you see, when people are really sort of at dying and really horrible symptoms with aids, you often see high antibody levels, which means they have a lot of breakdown of their tissue.
Obviously you don’t need a test for that, and that that creates higher reactivity with the test, which shouldn’t be a surprise. Obviously, it’s testing for different proteins and different chemicals in your biological fluid, and you would expect more of those chemicals if you’re breaking down more. The issue that we’re claim we’re addressing here is the specificity. There is no specificity, but there is seem to be, at least tentatively, I would say, some correlation with the sicker you are, the more your tissue is breaking down. If you have horrible rheumatoid arthritis or lupus and your joints are breaking down, you will have more reactivity on standard antigen or antibody tests, just because that’s all they’re measuring is the amount of debris and proteins and probably other debris in your tissue.
More sick, more debris, more positive tests. There’s no more specificity than that. Okay, next question, which I get regularly and God, a number of times is, mind you, I don’t necessarily have answers to all these questions. What school should I go to if I want to learn about true healing or true medicine or you could even say new biology. This is a very hard question. A lot of young people ask me this. They feel a kind of calling to be a doctor or a healer or work in medicine in some ways. And having been exposed to me and a whole bunch of other people, they’re rightfully discouraged about going into a traditional educational setting for medicine, dentistry, veterinary naturopathy, chiropractic or whatever.
So the first thing I would say is for a number of reasons, I cannot see going into MD do standard medical school. Not only do many of the people get into 2 to $400,000 in debt, which means you will end up having to work for some group or some corporation or some hospital or some ER or something, which means they will absolutely tell you how to practice medicine. So that can become a nightmare. And you will have years before you get out from under that financial burden and you may make a fair living during that time and essentially be but you will realize that if you quit, you’re going to have a lot of problems because you cannot replace that income with a just a sort of normal office holistic medicine clinic like that I ran for years.
I did not make $400,000 a year or whatever that a lot of doctors who work for corporate entities or hospitals are making now and is required to pay off the debt. In addition, you learn nonsense, which is never a good thing. In addition, they will essentially harass you and make you do things, not only just stay up at night and essentially undermine your health, but you will be continually bombarded with testing and vaccines and all the other things that are the accoutrements of conventional medicine. And that also includes osteopathy, dental school and I think veterinary school.
So I cannot in good conscience recommend that. Now unfortunately, naturopath school, while may not cost quite as much, although I think it’s hugely expensive as well, what they’re teaching to me is not much better. It’s still the old disproven biology and you have far less flexibility and options for your work environment when you’re out. So you have to set up your own practice, which will be hard for you to recoup that financial outlay and pay off your debts. So that can become a bit of a nightmare as well. And bottom line is I don’t think you’ll learn what you’re hoping to learn.
So that option doesn’t seem great to me either. I don’t know much about chiropractic school or massage school, but the only thing I can say is I would use those avenues to simply get a license. If it seems like getting the license is important in your basically your health medicine practice, it’s seeming like it’s not as important now as it used to be. There’s many avenues of health coaching and nutritional counseling and doing private memberships where people can set up their own essentially their business and start working on helping people outside of that system. And so at the end of the day, even though I would admit this is self serving, I think your Best bet is the taking the new biology curriculum course and then hooking up with other new biology curriculum graduates and forming yourself into learning groups, which I will be helping with and I will make myself available to work with.
And I think in that setting you will be able to learn enough of what you need to learn to be able to along with your own self study. And essentially you learn by working with yourself. And you know, there’s other programs, Kelly Brogan’s Vital Mind Reset, which you do, then you do the program yourself. That’s the best way to learn that. So that’s another avenue so you can essentially piece together a program where you really learn the real biology, the new biology, the true biology and very specific practices and techniques and ways of working with people.
And as far as I can see, that’s the best way to go now. So people also of course asked me do I know any doctors that I can refer people to? And the answer to that, generally speaking is no. Although again we’re compiling a sort of directory, I think we’re sort of in the early stages of this, of the practitioners who finish the new biology curriculum. And hopefully once we get that together we can say at least these are the people who are familiar with the real way biology is meant to be studied and can be understood, at least understanded in the way that I’m talking about.
And we should be able to feel more a safe and secure and met by people who’ve done that, you know, two, three month program where they really learned the foundations of the new biology way of thinking. Of course again, it’s a little self serving maybe, but I can’t help but think that is exactly the reason why we set up our new biology clinic. And we have all but one of the new biology practitioners, wellness specialists were at the Wise Traditions conference. Some of you probably met them, you can hear about them. They were answering questions and doing small presentations in the group.
We had a lot of chance to really meet in person and get to know each other. And it’s really an amazing group of healers, people who have really put a lot of thought and effort and time and diligence into understanding what is true and what isn’t in biology and medicine and how to work with people. And we have regular meetings and go over not only the cases, the situations where we’ve had success, but the more difficult ones. And this is clearly and by far the most exciting medical endeavor that I’ve ever been part of. I’ve been part of other groups.
Nothing is like this. If you really have a health problem that you need to find somebody who can give you some solid feedback and advice and really listen to your story and not going to treat you. Based on make believe hypothesis and disproven hypothesis, the new biology clinic is the place to go. I was also asked a number of times, when is it appropriate to go see a doctor, especially a conventional doctor, a functional doctor. And in conjunction with that, it’s when is it, Is it important to get screened for disease? Is it important to get preventative health care? What do I think about that? Now I know that I’m recycling stories that I’ve told for sometimes 10 or 20 years and you’ve heard them all.
But my mother, who I actually was very close to, used to be on me for, you know, Tom, you have to get regular medical care, regular screening and regular checkups. She used to say, not that she didn’t know what I, how I felt about all this, but she’s worried about me. That’s what mothers, I guess, sometimes do. So I used to. My standard reply was, mom, I get regular health care, regular checkups. My last one was when I was required to do it to enter residency, 1984. I have an appointment in 2034 and again in 2084.
So that is very regular. I get regular checkups. Turns out it’s every 50 years. And by the way, I made sure the one in 2034 was with an old guy. So if he dies, then I guess I don’t have to go. And obviously that’s a silly answer to a serious question. But the real answer, of course is I haven’t had a blood test or an exam since 1984. I’ve had a few things that I’ve encountered the health profession, like my heart thing that I wrote about in the book. But otherwise I don’t get screened, I don’t get regular blood tests, I don’t do any checks or monitoring of the numerical parameters of how I’m doing.
I essentially made a decision that it’s, it’s a similar thing with the pumpkin story that I can see and experience and control or at least not necessarily control, but I have, if I practice and I, I wouldn’t say believe in it, but I start with the theory of what if I said nobody’s going to help me out, I’m just going to have to see how I feel and I’m going to adjust my life accordingly to based on how I feel. In other words, if I don’t feel good, if I’m getting weak or So I may do something different.
I may eat different, I may work out different, exercise different, sleep different hours, talk to people in different ways, take a different herb or sell salt or whatever it is. And then I give myself a certain time and I try to honestly and realistic, say, say to myself and assess what happened. And I’ve been doing this, you know, for almost 40 years. And I don’t rely on blood tests. I don’t rely on other people’s opinion. I rarely, if ever, go to any kind of massage or chiropractor. I mean, it’s been less than two or three times in my life, actually.
So I basically. Not that I’m against getting feedback from people. I think there is reason to do that. But I went into this with the. Again, I think it’s a hypothesis. Let’s see if I can get myself more and more tuned into how I’m doing and what I might have to do. So I will know. For instance, there’s certain days that I need to eat more vegetables. There’s certain days I need to eat more fruit. There’s other days I need to eat less fruit or vegetables and I need to eat more meat or more fat or take a certain thing that I don’t usually take.
And then I take that for two or three days or until it doesn’t feel right to take it anymore. And then I stop. Now, I’m not putting myself out here as the, you know, everybody should do what I do. And I’m the paragon of health. And I know that there’s people who have issues, and I know that there could be situations that I can’t figure out, can’t understand, can’t get a feedback. But I also think that the idea that I’m going to rely on this and practice this, and to me, that was the key. I’m going to practice doing this just about every day of my life.
How do I eat? How did I sleep? How do I interact with people? What do I think? What do I watch? How much am I out in the sun? What am I, you know, interacting with? And then I adjust and I trust that I will pick up something that will tell me what to do. And in fact, that is what has happened through the years. Again, I think it’s wonderful to get feedback and I probably maybe should have, although I can’t really think of any times that I should have over the years. I’m not saying that trusted people like our doctors at the new biology clinic and some of the graduates can’t say, well, what about this and there is something also magical about telling your story to a new person, particularly somebody who actually knows how to listen and ask questions and give you feedback about their store about what you’re saying.
I think that is a wonderful thing. And this can also happen in group settings. That’s also an amazing experience for many people. And I’ve had some of that with various group settings where I’ve learned things that I don’t think I could have otherwise. So I’m not against learning in any way you can and from other people including about how what your health is like. I don’t believe though that screening for cancer works. I don’t believe that any screening test has actually shown to result in people having better lives. I’ve never seen any research that has convinced me of that.
And so until that’s the case, I’m going to probably continue with my strategy and I’ll as I said, I laid it out so you can think about it for yourself. The next one was I showed at my presentation which you also you can probably get a copy of the presentation from the Wise Traditions podcast place. And again maybe we can put a link in the show notes. I showed some pictures of some buildings and asked the question who built these buildings? So maybe the best thing is to show these. So let me share. So let me go through these websites, sorry, the PowerPoint.
So these were the pictures and obviously this came at the end of the an hour and 15 minute lecture. But as you’ve heard me speak those many of you that all we can really prove that exists in our tissues is this basically this cellular structure which has a very thin, seemingly fat soluble capsule on it. And then it has a dome shaped nucleus in the middle. It’s got these little power plants called mitochondria. And the nucleus, which is the dome shape, which seems to have some sort of metallic antenna protruding from it, is embedded, we don’t know how, but probably through different proteins into a column of water.
And what’s so amazing if you start looking back into the old architecture is that that’s exactly the scheme that these old buildings were using. Don’t seem to have a cursor here. This obviously is the Taj Mahal. And we see the dome and we see the antenna and we see the columns that are shaped like capacitors. They’re like electromagnetic accentuation devices that bring this into a pool of water. And I asked the question. So we’re told, and this is the central part of this story, we’re told that the evolution of humanity as Far as technology has been a linear progression from, you know, monkeys to cavemen with no tools, to cavemen with hammers.
And then thousands or millions of years later, they get the wheel and then they eventually hook up to donkeys and then they make donkey carts. And that this building was built during the donkey cart era, where the highest technology, they had no power tools, no engines, no locomotion, except animal or human power with crudely cut wheels. And then you go up into the modern era and then the power tools were invented. I believe the first power tool was 1895. And so basically, besides showing how similar the architecture is to the architecture of life. So if we have the hypothesis that what a living system is, is a coherent water that collects electromagnetic influences through the antenna and downloads them through this dome into our water, and that the information about life is through this collection accentuation into water system, that seems to be exactly what was happening here.
And that’s an amazing quote, coincidence, which of course can’t possibly be a coincidence. So this structure seems to be there to harvest something from the electromagnetic field, the so called ether around it, and download that into the water to be used for something. And maybe we don’t know why, but the question that was asked was how did they make these things? And again, we’re always starting with the negative. I think you can clearly say, and this is another example of an amazing structure in Italy. Just if you just think about could we actually even make something like this today? Now, this geometry, you know, that we see in the National Mall with these pillars and this just amazing structure were all made clearly before anybody had the ability allegedly to see things from above, which would be an amazing feat to construct such a thing with.
So with the amazing geometry of this without actually being able to view from above what you were making, we see so many things like these just amazing structures, which would be really difficult, if not impossible to even make with all of the intricate artwork and just amazing detail of these massive structures. And these were allegedly built in the horse and donkey and square wheel, no power tool era, with very primitive transportation mechanisms. And again, you see something like this A. It’s really just mind blowing when you see this. There’s also, you know, and you see them in places like Nashville, Tennessee.
Why are they building these Greek temples, you know, Parthenons, with the look at the amazing artwork above and building this in the era where it was still supposedly in the American frontier. And then you get into. Here’s an old thing from like supposedly thousands of years ago and from places that were not hardly even settled when these buildings were allegedly constructed. And then you see even the anomalies of this is built shortly after the whole country of New Zealand was settled, supposedly as a mental hospital. And you have to wonder why it was such a desperate need to build a thousand to two thousand bed mental hospital in a place like New Zealand.
In that era, did they have that many mentally ill patients? And so you have to wonder about that. The people were apparently living like this and like this, and yet they were building structures like this. So that. And here’s another one in a place near where I used to live, there’s maybe 20,000 people living there now. And apparently they. Back in hundred, over a hundred years ago, there were so many psychiatric patients who needed to be institutionalized in a way out of the way place like Traverse City, Michigan, that they need to build this massive 2,000 bad mental institution.
Now the question was, who do I think built this? And the answer is I don’t really know. But I don’t believe the regular story. It cannot possibly be. There’s more to of that to this story. Even how you could lift these beams up and put things, make this kind of intricate architecture and this kind of how do you build this without power tools and transportation? And all I can conclude, and I will finish with this, is they were using a kind of technology that we have no idea about, which throws the whole historical timeline into question for sure.
And the thing that’s relevant to us is there is a possibility that these were all various forms of healing and energy harvesting devices. And so they had a way of healing through working with the actual biology, the way that living systems are actually constructed, which may have been much more powerful, safe, effective, useful than anything that we have now based on our crude and incorrect understanding of what life is. So those of us in the new biology world are not necessarily trying to recreate or to forge a totally new system on our own. We’re actually doing some of that, but also looking to the past with it.
Also it this happens in Chinese medicine and Ayurvedic medicine and shamanic healing, many other disciplines that actually had a realistic view of what living beings were made of and how and why they heal. And so we don’t actually need to reinvent the wheel. We just need to get out of our own way, ask the right questions, not believe what we’re told. And hopefully that is the path to finding where we really want to go. So with that, thanks everybody for listening and I always appreciate all your comments and feedback and I hope you have a great week and I will see you next week.
[tr:tra].
See more of DrTomCowan on their Public Channel and the MPN DrTomCowan channel.
Author
