➡ The text discusses the importance of well-conducted studies in evaluating the effectiveness of medicines. The author emphasizes that while a healthy lifestyle is crucial, some people may still need additional medical help. They also challenge the traditional understanding of the heart as a pump, suggesting it functions more like a vortex generator. The author concludes by introducing Strophanthus, a plant extract, as a potential treatment for heart disease.

➡ Dr. Berthold Kern, a German internist, found that the regular use of G Strophanthine, an extract from the Strophanthus gratis plant, can prevent heart attacks and related deaths. Kern’s research challenges the common belief that heart attacks are primarily caused by blocked arteries. Instead, he suggests that heart attacks are due to a buildup of acid in the heart, which G Strophanthine can prevent. His findings, based on real-world studies and autopsies, have led to the successful use of G Strophanthine by over 5,000 doctors in Germany.

➡ The text discusses the use of Strafanthus seed extract in treating heart conditions. Several case studies are presented where patients with severe heart issues, including heart failure and atrial fibrillation, experienced significant improvements after using the extract. The improvements included reduced symptoms, better heart function, and in some cases, a remarkable recovery. Despite the lack of extensive scientific studies, the consistent positive results suggest that Strafanthus seed extract could be a highly effective treatment for heart conditions.

➡ Patients with chest pain were given a special capsule and most felt better within two weeks, allowing them to stop taking other medicines. This treatment, derived from a plant called Strophanthus, has a long history of use by indigenous people in Africa. Studies suggest it’s a safe and effective way to treat chest pain and other heart-related conditions. The goal is to keep this natural treatment option alive for those who prefer it over traditional drugs and surgery.

So today is another Wednesday webinar. Wednesday, December 17, 2025. And I have a number of announcements I need to make. But first I wanted to say there was some big news in New York State that was announced today. I just saw it an hour ago or so, which was New York State now has a bill to legalize assisted suicide. I guess many other states do, but as of hope. Well, not hopefully, but New York State is going to put up a bill or they have a bill legalizing suicide. Now. That surprised me, of course, because I had actually thought that allopathic medicine was already legal in New York City state.

And so I don’t know why they would need a new bill, but apparently they think they do. So that was the news today. And again, thanks everybody for joining me. The first announcement is there will not be a Wednesday webinar next week, it’s Christmas Eve. And then the following week is New Year’s Eve. So no Wednesday webinar the following two weeks. And then I think we pick it up again January 7th. Yes, January 7th of the new Year. So hopefully everybody has a good break and a great holiday season and a happy New Year. And I will see you after today in three weeks, January 7, 2026.

The other announcements are similar to the last two weeks, but they’re so important for us and hopefully for you that I just wanted to reemphasize them, which is the new biology clinic will have a price increase starting the new year, January 1, 2026. But for those current members, there will be no price increase for two years. And this is the important part. If you sign up to become a member of the new biology Clinic before January 1st, you lock in that price for two years and essentially you’ll be the same as people who’ve been members. So if you’re thinking about it, now is the time because there will be a price increase January 1st.

And if you are a current member, that won’t apply to you. Or if you sign up before January 1st. That’s the first announcement. The second is I’ve spoken about we’re going to have a new biology get community gathering at Polyface Farm in Virginia. That’s June 4 to 6. And stay on the lookout for an early bird discount. We’re expecting that the event will fill up. There’s only a certain number of people that Polyface can accommodate. So we’re expecting that to fill up. And I think in the show notes there will be a place where the early bird discount sign up is is listed.

If not, just keep your eye open for it because A, you get a better price and B, you’ll be assured of your place. And I hope to see everybody, as many as possible, there. I can’t see everybody because there’s not enough room for the venue to accommodate everybody. And the third announcement is with the new biology clinic. We offer what are called connection sessions. We have a number of wonderful people who are our customer service representatives and they know a lot about what’s happening in the clinic and they are familiar with all the primary wellness specialists.

So free of charge, you can sign up and have a session with them which is not about your health. They’re not there to be acting like doctors or giving you medical advice, but they’re there to explain how the clinic works, how to sign up, which specialist might be most appropriate for you, and just what your experience might be like. And that, as I said, is free. So if you’re at all interested, that’s the place to go. And hopefully that also will be put in the show notes so you can easily sign up to do a connection session.

The people who do that really know a lot and. And I think you’ll get a lot out of that. And I think those are the main announcements. Let me just check that I was. Yes, that’s pretty much it. And so let’s get to what I was going to talk about today, which is a couple things. Strus, the history of Strus. And I think I’ll start with how I choose medicines or what I look for in a medicine, and that will lead into what I have to say about structure. So obviously I’ve been doing this for a while.

This meaning doing medicine or assessing healthcare products, medicines, diets, it’s. Etc, you know, for over 40 years. And as you can imagine, there’s been a lot of more than I can even remember. It may be even in the hundreds, certainly at least somewhere near a hundred or maybe more. Usually people contact me and say they’d like me to try out whatever their medicine is or their device and. And it cures everybody of everything and so I should use it on all my patients and endorse it, et cetera. And so what do I do when I hear that? Because I.

First of all, I take all of those seriously because as I’ve said many times, most of the positive interventions that I’ve done in my career have actually come from a suggestion of a patient or maybe not a suggestion, but a person had such and such. And they came in and I said, what’s up? And they said, well, I used to have lupus and then I drank horse urine and now I’m all better. And so what I would hear is that they would tell their rheumatologist or their primary doctor and they would dismiss it and didn’t want to hear anything about it.

But I always said, you know, where’d you get the horse and how much horse urine did you drink, etc. So I took these very seriously because they ended up being a lot of the medicines and a lot of the things that I used either in my personal life or with patients over the years, but of course not all of them. And so when I, what I would do is I had a sort of in my mind a criteria. So number one, I wanted something or I was more interested in things that were quote, natural. That’s a little complicated and tricky because not all the things that I ended up using like low dose naltrexone for instance, chlorine dioxide, or even ascorbic acid, otherwise known as vitamin C.

I wouldn’t call those natural medicines. Those are manufactured or highly processed or synthesized or extracted in modern unusual ways, let’s say. But at the same time I was more interested in things from nature, either salts or minerals or plants or you know, animal extracts, you know, thyroid extracts, heart extracts, so called glandulars. Those were more interesting to me and I checked those out a little bit more intensively. But I also didn’t rule out the fact that it’s possible that more manufactured things like ascorbic acid, which I ended up using a lot of as liposomal vitamin C actually might be effective medicines.

And then I would look at how they were processed and you know, we tend to think of processing as a dirty word. And of course I don’t want to eat anything or take any medicine that’s processed. But that’s actually not very realistic because after all, I mean, butter is processed and sauerkraut is processed. And if you cook a steak that’s processed or if you make bone broth that’s processed and even if you cut up lettuce for a salad, you could say that’s processing. And the oil that you extract from olives, that is a kind of process processing.

So it isn’t that processing rules things out. So I was looking for what you would say old fashioned processing techniques like fermentation, like cooking, like distillation, like taking herbs and extracting them in alcohol, like making ash or powder out of the herbs in so called spagyric tinctures and then making distillations or Steam and then recombining those with the liquid and the steam and the ash part. Also homeopathic potentization, where the original substance, usually a mineral or a metal or an animal part, like bee stings, bee venom, snake venom, lots of different animal parts are used, also different plants, and then they’re shaken and diluted in a very specific way called potentization.

And so that is a kind of processing too. And I was very interested in that as well. So I would hear about the processing, I would hear about the source of it, I would try to understand that at least the proposed mechanism. Even though as time went on I became more and more skeptical of any proposed mechanism. And now I would say I’m almost a complete disbeliever in, in any proposed mechanism, because I don’t really believe we actually know what happens when you take even food or Strafanthus or any medicine, vitamin C, and what actually happens inside your body.

I don’t think we really understand that. We have ideas and make stories and have conjectures and maybe they’re right and maybe they’re not. But that wasn’t the way that I typically evaluated, although I certainly took that into consideration. And then I would do, what I would do then is whenever somebody said, oh, you got to try this, it cures everybody of everything, I would ask them if they could send me a study that would document that that was a accurate and scientifically done and reliable study. And essentially nobody had those kind of studies, which isn’t surprising, partly because maybe the studies wouldn’t get published or they didn’t have the money.

And I know from trying to actually do studies with straight it’s a difficult task to do to organize a well done study. So just because there wasn’t a study I could look at didn’t rule it out. So then I asked them for three case studies or three histories of people where it appeared that the only thing different they did was take such and such a medicine. And then they had an outcome which I felt like I had enough experience with what happens to people to understand that this is something that just doesn’t usually happen. So for instance, if somebody has a cough and then you say I gave them this and they got better, that doesn’t help very much because people with coughs typically get better if you do nothing or if you stick your head in, you know, a warm room or you stick your head in a cold room or you take an herb or whatever, and maybe it’ll get better a little faster.

But that was a very difficult thing. To evaluate, because generally people got better. But typically people with, you know, I keep using lupus or bladder cancer or, you know, they had three mis and they’re having chest pain when they walk to the mailbox. Those are the kind of things that generally don’t get better if people don’t do anything. So that’s what I would look for. And I would say, send me three case studies with whatever tests were done and a testimonial, actual words from the person who did it, and then I would want a contact information so I could verify it, that this is actually accurate.

And interestingly, a little bit surprisingly, although not so much, I rarely got even one valid case study for most of the medicines that people proposed to me. Now, I just want to say another thing because some people might even say, well, what do you need medicines for? You know, shouldn’t I eat well and I go outside and get in the sun and I ground to the earth and I have good relations with my family and I express my feelings and I drink clean water and I move my body and I don’t need your stinking medicines. And I totally get that.

And those are the, the framework and the things that in our clinic and in my practice, those were the foundation that we did for everybody. But I would still contend, at least in what I was doing and what I saw, that there still are people who need something else. And maybe that’s not true, and maybe that’s all one ever needs to do. But I did see people who we seem to be maxed out on the sort of normal lifestyle. Their diet was as good as they could make it. They got out, they were getting outside, they were working on traumas and how they think in their relationships and their food and their water, and they still needed more help.

And I thought in that what I was there to do was to help their life be better. And if I could find a medicine that wouldn’t hurt them and would seemingly make their life better, I was all for it. And I felt like that was my job and my responsibility as a practitioner. And we all feel the same way at the new biology clinic, all the practitioners. And so I don’t really have much sympathy for we shouldn’t do any medicine. I think there’s a lot of different kinds of medicine. Homeopathy and cell salts and herbs and energy devices and biofield tuning and emotional clearing and coffee enemas and turpentine and lots of things that seem to help people do better and clear up things that wouldn’t clear up otherwise.

If they just did the foundational things. And again, I want to emphasize you always do the foundational things. Clean up the diet, clean up the water, move sunlight, earthing, work on your thoughts and your relationships, clear up traumas and then you go from there. And so that’s really what I’m talking about as the role of medicines and a little bit on how I chose the medicines. So with that, we can use that as a framework for looking at Strafanthus. And I’m going to be reading a lot just because I found some things that I think will put this in perspective probably better than I could have.

So I’m going to look at a few things here and I’m going to share here. And I’m going to start with an interesting thing I saw on the heart. And apparently this is written by a guy named Brian Clark, who I have no idea who that is. And it doesn’t matter because I don’t tend to look at whether this is a cardiologist or a homeless person or anywhere in between. I just want to know what they say and does the what they say make sense and actually enlighten us about something. So let me just read this because I think it’s actually probably one of the best descriptions of the heart that I’ve ever run across.

A little bit interesting wording here, but let’s give it a try. So they taught you the heart was just a glorified meat pump, that it squeezes and pushes blood like some crude mechanical device, a hydraulic engine made of flesh. That is what they want you to believe because if you buy into that primitive lie, you never ask deeper questions. But it is false. It has always been false. And the real science proves it. Dr. Francesco Torrent, WASP, a Spanish cardiac researcher, discovered what the textbooks refused to acknowledge, that the heart is not a pump. He dissected thousands of hearts and found that the heart is a single continuous muscle band folded into a spiral.

He proved that the heart works like a vortex generator, creating suction and torque, not pressure. He called it the helical ventricular myocardial band. And it changes everything. The real movement of the blood comes from pressure differentials, electromagnetic flow, slow and coherent resonance. The blood spirals naturally. It need not to be forced through miles of arteries and capillaries. That idea is beyond stupid. The so called pump is not strong enough to push thick fluid through 60,000 miles of tubing. That is basic physics. That lie was dead on arrival. Here is the truth. Blood moves before the heart forms in the embryo.

That is by the way, is a documented fact. It flows via frequency resonance and electric charge. The body is a field, not a factory. Your heart creates a toroidal electromagnetic field that radiates six meters from the body. This field syncs with the earth, the sun and every living being around you. It is a resonator, a tuner, a conductor. It aligns the rhythm of your cells. It feels, it remembers, it emits and it responds to emotion, thought, light, sound and breath. When you feel love, grief, fear or peace, your heart transmitted. It is the central frequency modulator of your biology, not a fucking pump.

And the institutions know this. The HeartMath Institute has measured these fields for decades. They know the heart has more neuronal cells than parts of the brain. They know it is a second brain. They know coherence in the heart transforms the entire nervous system. So why are they still teaching children? A 400 year old guess from William Harvey that has never been updated. Because if you knew the truth, you would never accept statins or beta blockers again. You would understand that trauma, emotion and disconnection break the heart field, not cholesterol. You would stop obeying the medical cartel and start tuning your body like the intelligent frequency field it is.

They do not want coherent humans. They want disrupted and inflamed, fragmented people who rely on drugs to survive. That is the business model and the fake heart pump lie is central to it. Your heart is not a pressure valve. It is a vortex, a field tuner, a resonating gateway between physical and energetic worlds. It is the instrument of your soul and it has been hijacked by science and that refuses to evolve. That, I would say is a brilliant short essay and I have almost nothing to add to that because I couldn’t agree more. He got it exactly right.

And it is one of the central lies that disconnects people from the reality of their experience and the reality of their life. So we don’t want statins and beta blockers and calcium channel blockers, but what about Strophanthus? So we’re talking strophanthus seed extracts and what can we say about them? So here’s another paper and I’m going to go through this. So today is paper and this is written by somebody else who I don’t know, Stephen Ross. G. Strophanten. G. Strophantine. A new approach for heart disease. That G. Strophanthine, is basically an extract. So I can show you right here comes from an extract of an African plant called Strophanthus gratis.

There’s Also Strophanthus combi, which is G or K strophanthine. And, and the G Strophanthine is from the Strophanthus gratis plant. And this was one of the historical founders of it. Dr. Berthold Kern was an internist in Germany. Says the regular clinical use of oral G Strophanthine prevents lethal myocardial tissue acidosis and substantially reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction. That’s heart attacks. And completely prevents infarction deaths. That means deaths from heart attacks. Now, he talks about a mechanism here and I would just reemphasize that. I have questions about all the different mechanisms. But what we really want to know is does it reduce the incidence of heart attacks? Does it prevent deaths from heart attacks? And then maybe we can speculate a little bit on how it might work.

So then he goes through a little bit of, you know, there’s over a million heart attacks in the United States. This was a number of years ago, 500,000 deaths. So it isn’t like we’ve solved this problem. The cornerstone of treatment and prevention is a theory that they the coronary arteries are blocked and this is thought to be the cause of the infarction. This adheres to the widely accepted coronary artery thrombosis theory of infarction. That is, the arteries become blocked with plaque damage from things like smoking, high cholesterol. The clot forms a fissure, the clot shuts off the blood flow and this causes a heart attack.

Simple, straightforward. The arteries are clogged, no blood can get through, the muscles stop because it is not supported by the blood flow. The heart metabolism stops and that leads to death. So Kern, and he wasn’t the first, but he came up with a different theory and he did this simply by doing autopsies. And he said the autopsies do not corroborate the finding that of the coronary obstruction hypothesis. He started looking into the literature and he found it was a different theory. And he says this led to a different therapy used by over 5,000 doctors in Germany with a lot of success.

And so he, he summarized this, the three ways to infarction that the obstruction theory doesn’t explain the observed facts. The underlying factor in heart attacks is a chemical destructive process unchecked by metabolic acidosis. In other words, the accumulation of acid in the left ventricle and is not related to blockages in the artery. And this regular use of G Strophanthine, that’s the extract of strafanthus A prevents this tissue acidosis and therefore reduces the incidence of infarction and death. He then looked through the peer reviewed journal or Science to see if there’s any corroboration of this. And this is interesting because there are some quotes here.

One from an article in Circulation 1980 and it says the data support the concept that an occlusive coronary thrombus has no primary role in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarct. In other words, that all this blocked artery theory, the blocked artery clots is not the primary cause of heart attacks. They went on to say these reports present clear refutation of the most common explanation used today to dismiss autopsy findings which detect no coronary thrombi. That the thrombi either existed or been lysed away or somehow washed away. In other words, what they’re saying is this has been known since this start of this theory that that many of the people, in fact anywhere between 80 and 20% and most of it most of the studies somewhere around 60%, up to 80% of the people who die of heart attacks and have an autopsy have no coronary artery thrombosis or clot to explain that another source of the inconsistency is the normal coronary angiograms.

In other words, people have a myocardial infarction, a heart attack, but their coronary arteries are normal. And here’s an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine and interestingly we forget about these. This was 20 years of coronary bypass surgery. So this was a therapy that was based on addressing this problem. Neither the VA nor cast that’s the National Institute of Health Surgery study has detected a significant difference in long term survival between the two assigned groups, medical and surgical, when all patients have been included. In other words, doing bypasses didn’t help at all. Same with angioplasty, putting stents in antithrombolytic or clot busting therapies.

No clear cut improvement in survival. Then he goes on with all these are things that I mentioned before, this guy named Beroldi who found that only 20% of people on autopsy had a significant blockage. And he was able to come up with a technique filling the arteries with artificial blood. And he was able to see the actual blood supply to the heart which is by thousands or so of these collateral arteries. And therefore heart bypass would be redundant because the main blood flow is not through these central arteries as we’ve been told, but through the small blood vessels.

And then Kern goes on to propose the metabolic conditions and the so called glycolytic shift and document with animal studies that pretty much in every cause of a heart attack there is a lowering of the ph. And so then he wanted to find a medicine that would restore the ph and that thereby preventing tissue damage. And he for some reason decided to look at the cardiac glycosides. And I talked about this, including Digitalis and Strafanthus. But he had a problem, which is the cardiac glycosides are known to have a positive inotropic effect, I.e. they increase the contraction of the heart and this makes the problem of the metabolic deficiency worse.

But then they came to an interesting realization and this was done using placebo controlled double blind studies. They found that intravenous Strafanthus did have this positive cardiac inotropy effect, meaning it increased the contraction of the heart, whereas oral doses did not exert this positive inotropic effect. They propose that it’s two different receptors. I doubt that that’s true. Again, we don’t have to agree with the mechanism to see that giving it intravenously made the heart contract harder. That’s something you could see and measure, whereas giving it orally did not do that. But they had the same effect on getting rid of the acidosis or mitigating the acidosis in the heart.

And so then we get to the real issue, which is I want to see so what happens when you give this oral strophanthus extract to people. And he had a clinical practice between 47 and 1968, 15,000 people, he treated them with oral strophanthus and he reported that he saw no fatal infarcts and only 20 non fatal infarcts in his patient. And his usual statistics would have said there should have been 120 fatal and 400 non fatal infarcts. So that doesn’t prove anything. I’m not saying this is a absolute proof of anything, but we’re looking for what happens when people in the real world setting take this medicine.

So then there goes on to say there’s now 5,000 doctors in Germany, this was a few years ago, who use some form of oral strophanthus extract. No one gave a negative response to this and something like 90 some percent said it was positive. Then they went on to report a in a real life setting, in a German coal mine, they looked at this period 72 to 74, that the miner suffered acute chest pain 229 times. And 11 minors died during this period. Then from this time to 75 to 80, all those who had experienced acute chest pain, 280 episodes were immediately given oral G Strophanthine, oral oral Strafanthus, xpac.

No minors died after the onset of the symptoms. No toxic effects were observed. Many variables were studied. The age, access, better working conditions are different to sure compatibility of the results. So again we have another interesting observation that people who take strophantis extracts in this setting and again, I’m not saying this proves anything, but it’s certainly things that the kind of things I was looking for. What happens in real world settings when you give a whole bunch of people strophanthus extract. So then we go to a claim of a rigorous double blind randomized trial of oral strophanthus extract in the treatment of angina, otherwise known as chest pain after 14 days, and the references are down below, 81% of the people in the treated group had a reduction in attacks.

In control group, 72% received placebo. And as far as they could say that the groups were otherwise identical, they had an increase in attacks. So 81% of the people treated with oral strophanthus had a reduction in episodes. 72% of the people who didn’t take it or took a placebo, they actually had an increase in the attacks, which is what you would expect because the disease tends to progress. So here’s another one. In a study of 150 seriously ill people, 254 had heart attacks. Oral strophanthus was successful 85% of the time. And the comment was a positive result was registered when the severe heart attack abated at least five minutes after the G strophanthine capsule was bitten through.

And after 10 minutes at the latest, they disappeared completely. There was no side effects, the cost was not very significant, et cetera. So these are the kind of things that got me to originally try it when I looked at. So there’s a mechanism which I don’t know if that’s accurate or not, but real world studies on what happened as best they could, sometimes even using double blind and placebo controls or observation of people in similar situations. And that was enough to get me to think this is something that I have to try with my patients and see what happens to see if I could generate these three case studies that I’m asking other people to do.

So that’s a little bit of the background. And so then I wanted to show you some of the studies. And interestingly, these I chose mostly for of people who were not my patients, people I used to run like every month. Or so I would do a little webinar with doctors on how to use Strafanthus and then they would go off and use them by themselves and then they would report. So this wasn’t me. Somehow Tom is somehow able to convince people in some sort of plus, you know, positive placebo effect to get better and nobody else can.

These are mostly reports from other people. Now you will see that very few of them are people who the only thing that happened was treatment with stran extract. There are a few, but that’s the real world situation that we live in. Again, you know, with everybody who took stranis, they had a. I suggested they do a better diet and ground and get out in the sun and move and clear up emotional things. All the things that we talked about that have relation to the heart. And so here is a physician from Kentucky who says a 60 year old man with atrial fib, severe heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiomyopathy.

That’s basically, it means a very sick heart, untreated, substantial, untreated high blood pressure. If his ejection fraction fell to less than 20%, so what that means an ejection fraction is basically a very good measurement that you get from an ultrasound of the efficiency of the heart. And it’s basically tells you how much of the blood goes out of the heart at each beat. And this does not mean the heart is pumping the blood, but the blood should go out. And you can get a pretty good reading on how someone’s heart is functioning by looking at their ejection fraction.

So somebody whose ejection fraction is 70%, that’s usually a very highly trained fit athlete. 60 to 70% is a person who has a very strong heart that ejects most of the blood or 60%. 50% is sort of normal and people are fine. 40% is still okay. And people sometimes have symptoms and sometimes don’t. 30%, you start to have symptoms less than 20% and that’s real problem. And the reason I chose this is rarely do those people get better on their own. At least from what I’ve seen less than 10% is pretty much incompatible with normal function or normal life.

And so he was already on things like L carnitine and ubiquinol and D ribose, cordyceps, hawthorn, other anabolic botanicals. And then they put them on Lasix to get rid of the fluid. He did improve, but his parameters, these are all measurements of heart failure, were still very low and very limited to in physical activity. Then he did one of my sessions and he exhausted. All options were exhausted. He tried to titrate IT up over three weeks, 10 drops twice a day. The BNP dropped, the CRP went up, ET cetera. He was told to continue to titrate until reaching 15 drops a day.

See if I have. But we didn’t hear from him for many months, but heard indirectly that he was doing better. And then he comes back and all the blood tests are normal, his blood pressure was normal. Know if we have the. He reports no side effects, he has blood drawn, he has his life back and he has paved his way. And this is somehow isn’t written here, but his ejection fraction went up to about 48%. And again, that was something that is basically unheard of. And so that started to give me more and more confidence that this is a very special medicine, sort of like the gift from paradise that the native people had said.

So here’s another one from. We don’t want to put the patient’s name at his first heart attack at 45, second one at 60 while undergoing bypass. He died on the table. So I’ve been very careful to watch my diet. And then I started having chest pain. And the doctor said I was having hard signs of a heart attack. I also didn’t want to go down the same path as my father. My naturopathic doctor suggested I take Stervantis. Two months using it, chest pain totally gone. A strong sense of peace in my body, not sure how to describe it.

And these are the kind of things that I heard over and over again and again. These are the kind of case studies that this, of course, this could have happened. And I’m sure it does happen sometimes, but not in the regularity that I was seeing. So here’s somebody who is having angina attacks, 35 to 45amonth. Even though he was taking regular nitroglycerin, he took Strafanthis seed, and now he’s down to five angina attacks per month. Again, this is not something that usually happens. And you don’t see this just from doing nothing. So something happened. And the only variable here, and it’s always difficult to say that I know, is taking Strafanthra seed.

So this is a person with atrial fibrillation. And he had all kinds of symptoms of tingling in the hand and feet and chest pain and pressure on a continuous basis. This is a person who was my patient. And now he took some vitamin E and beet juice. And so this is seven, eight months later, afib Symptoms are gone, he was in normal sinus rhythm, tingling is gone, chest pain is gone, blood pressure is gradually coming back to normal. So again, we’re looking at different case studies, the real world of what people actually say who take this.

So here’s another one. This was an interesting one because I routinely tell people that this doesn’t happen and I’m not sure even the significance, but somebody who, not because of me, because I would never order chest CT scans, had a calcium score of 40. And then the only thing he did was start Strafanthus. And approximately a year later his calcium score became 12, which according to normal cardiology means that the calcium deposition in his blood vessels was much better. Now I routinely say that as far as I know, Strafanthus has no effect on blockages or, you know, the calcium score or how much calcium is deposited in the blood vessels.

But I also say that it has, it may have something to, it definitely has something to do with improving the heart function and maybe improving the structure of the water. Anytime I hear something that affects the sodium potassium distribution, to me that’s something that I think is coming from the structure of the water. So if you improve the structure of the water, then you don’t need to deposit calcium in your blood vessels in order to shore them up. And so this is not a direct like chelation or you know, getting rid of clots, but it’s an improvement of the cardiac metabolism, less acidosis and therefore hopefully less need for putting calcium in your blood vessels.

And remarkably, in just a year it basically resolved. And this was another one, the final one, this was from a Chinese medicine doctor in Colorado. So a 68 year old had heart failure, left ventricular damage, a stent was put in. But even after the stent the ejection fraction was 18%, which as I said is pretty much incompatible with normal functional function. He put him on six week of Strafanthus, three drops bid, which is not very much, and then later increased it to six twice a day, which is still not very much. And then he did it, a follow up ejection fraction of 47%.

And the technician commented, 15 years he never saw this kind of recovery. And the patient said, I feel my heart moving differently. This happened after this trifantus and apparently that was in fact true. So you can see that when I looking for, are there studies that show it that are well done? There are some and there are of course always some issues with any study. It’s very difficult to get control groups and have everything the Same in any group of human beings. And to predict what happens. And even if we don’t believe in the mechanism, that the mechanism hasn’t been proved, we can obviously see that there is a effect on a huge percentage of the people from using Strafantha seed extracts.

Here’s another one that I got which is, you know, again this was questionnairing of the doctors. In Germany, 98% of the doctors say it has a high degree of effectiveness. The other 2% said it’s within limits, positive, none said everything negative. Here’s another report of a placebo controlled double blind study using oral Strophanthus extracts. Angina patient experience, improved EKG and well being and feeling of well being. This was most had a marked improvement in their overall feeling of well being. And this was a report of this doctor using oral strophanthus capsules for 12 years in a large Berlin hospital, 99% of the patients with chest pain took a stomach acid resistant capsule and the complaints were free after two weeks, 82% after one week previous remedies.

All the drugs were able to be stopped. So again, using my criteria is it a. And here’s just some other long term, long documented effects. These are similar and you can see more in detail about the effects of strip. I’ll just put that on for a minute in case anybody wants to read that. So again, using my criteria of so people tell me about a medicine, I want to know where does it come from? And also did traditional people use it? And here we find a rich history of indigenous people in Africa actually calling it the gift from paradise and using it with all kinds of situations.

And then you go look for some sort of study that’s at least observational and maybe also uses some, you know, more rigorous scientific methodology. And even though this is never perfect and it’s hard to say you can prove anything with these, you certainly get an idea that this seems to be a safe and potentially effective medicine for treating these difficult conditions of chest pain. Going on to having, preventing heart attacks, people who are actually having heart attacks, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, things which are pretty resistant to the other kind of therapies. Again, that isn’t the only thing that I did.

And there you find case studies where there was clear improvement and very few if any negative effects in my 20 some years of using it. And I would say that pretty much summarizes my history of how I got to where I now am, which is thinking that one of my contributions to the world of medicine is hopefully to keep the use of Strophanthus seed extracts alive so that the people who want to look into it and choose to use it and not go down the usual drug and surgery way have an option. And I think it’s working.

And that project is going full steam ahead. All the doctors at our clinic are well aware of how to use it and what the thinking is behind it. And I thought I would just lay that out one more time so everybody can get an idea of where this all came from. Okay. That’s a lot of that. Thank you very much. And again, I hope everybody has a wonderful holiday season and a good start to the new year. And I will see you in a few weeks. And everybody take care.
[tr:tra].

See more of DrTomCowan on their Public Channel and the MPN DrTomCowan channel.