➡ The text discusses various political and legal issues, including the use of the Justice Department, lawsuits against the Trump administration, and the pardoning of certain individuals. It also mentions the work of Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch, who have sued the government multiple times and are currently representing the family of Ashley Babbitt in a wrongful death lawsuit. The text ends with a discussion about Ed Martin, who was appointed by President Trump to be the U.S. attorney and has been focusing on restoring law and order in Washington D.C.

➡ The Senate needs to decide whether to confirm President Trump’s preferred U.S. attorney, Ed Martin, before his temporary appointment ends on May 20th. If not confirmed, Judge Boasberg could choose his replacement. Martin has been effective in reducing crime in his district, and there are concerns about potential increases in crime if he is not confirmed. Despite some opposition, many hope that the Senate will confirm Martin to continue his work in making the district safer.

➡ The discussion revolves around the suggestion of appointing a special prosecutor to investigate potential abuses of power and election rigging. The speaker believes that President Trump should consider this option, possibly appointing figures like Matt Gaetz, Jeff Clark, or Rudy Giuliani as deputies. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of holding those accountable who attempt to undermine elections and criminalize questioning of election integrity. The speaker praises the work of Judicial Watch, a group that wasn’t deterred by these attempts and continues to fight for justice.

Mtg. Because over the weekend, she was up about all this about the Capitol Hill guys not supporting President Trump and the base on what they want to see done. We didn’t get into the other part, which is the destruction, deconstruction, administrative state, take down the deep state, all these other aspects. And the reason is we have the great Tom Fenton, who was kind enough to say, hey, I can come by today and do this in person. So, Finn, here’s a question. This Article 2 or the are the unitary executive. He’s chief executive officer of the United States government.

He can cut money. He can fire personnel. Number two, he’s commander in chief of the armed forces. He can attack, send bad guys out of the country. He can call for military action. Number three, which is sometime lost, sometimes lost. He’s chief magistrate and chief law enforcement officer of the US Government, full stop. Am I correct? You are. And Presidents Washington, President Adams, President Jefferson, President Madison, President Roosevelt 1 and President Roosevelt 2. President Lincoln famously all initiated, stopped and directly managed federal prosecutions. Hold on, rewind on that. They did what? Initiated or stopped and directed federal prosecutions.

In fact, reviewing the material on this over the weekend, Chief Justice Marshall yelled at the Jefferson administration for not moving quickly enough on the Aaron Burr prosecution. And he specifically was targeting Jefferson because Jefferson was running the prosecution. I mean, to the point of being involved. Best I understand it in depth, treason trial, by the way, depositions and such. So, you know, so practically for treason, it was not a small case, and the president was referred to as the chief executive magistrate. So there’s no doubt under the Constitution, you know, the powers of the president require the laws be faithfully executed.

And how is Constitution and custom and tradition? Well, yes, on top of that. Well, the custom and tradition flows from the obvious nature of his job as chief executive. Yes. And so what does that mean in the modern era? Well, in theory, it means President Trump could run the trial in any prosecution. He’d be in there playing prosecutor if he so chose. Chris Hayes. I hope your producers picked up no Ari Melver. Give me that again, sir. Give me that again. For the Ari Melver show, the president could conduct the prosecutor, quite literally conduct the prosecution.

Now, there may be some rules related to court rules about, you know, lawyers being involved and such, but the point is, he can run the prosecution, request an investigation, demand a report back, and this is what I think he should do, and we talked about this before, he should set up a special prosecutor, separate in part from the FBI and the Justice Department. You know, use the Justice Department the reason is, is we got to. But they’re so overwhelmed with what they’ve got. Well, they’re overwhelmed and conflicted. Institutionally, they’re conflicted, yes. The FBI guys aren’t going to take out the FBI.

There aren’t enough doj, good people in doj. We don’t control those, we don’t control those buildings right now. So because you can’t, it’s going to take a while. So the president can, can set this up. He appoints a special prosecutor, and that special prosecutor does not report to the Attorney General. Reports to him. That’s right, an independent unit, an independent prosecutorial unit, investigative unit. He can have it staffed with individuals from other law enforcement agencies in the federal government or contract with private experts and, you know, private entities to do investigations and any criminal investigation or ultimately prosecution.

And he can sign off. He can be as detail oriented as he wants in terms of signing off on depositions, subpoenas, you know, leads, what is pursued, what isn’t. He can be quite involved and he can in the end, blast the prosecution one way or the other. Now, he may want to take the Attorney General’s advice as to the validity, the strength, the weakness of a prosecution, but in the end he makes the decision. And even short of that, he can go over, he can call Pam Bomdy over here today to his Oval Office and say, tell me what’s going on.

What prosecutions you considering? Have you looked at this? Why aren’t you looking at this? I want you to look at this and I want you to get back to me. Hang on. Ever since Watergate, that’s been verboten, right? That was the whole purpose of Watergate, is to hive off the Justice Department. So it could not, it would not have any association with the executive branch and particularly the office of the President. Well, no one’s suggesting a corrupt abuse of office here. Were suggesting a vigorous exercise of his constitutional responsibilities, duties and powers to ensure that the rule of law is vindicated.

And does it mean targeting someone specifically just because you don’t like them? You know, there, the rule. You still have the rule of law. You still have judges, you still have the constitutional protections, all the evident right, due process, and defendants get all the rights and witnesses or targets. No one’s suggesting all that be thrown out. But I’m suggesting is that the Justice Department, the FBI, are hopelessly conflicted. Really. I don’t even trust they’re competent enough to get it done, despite the new leadership. And it’s not, it’s no Smear on the leadership. We just know they’re crackpots that institutionally these things are still riven with, with, with deep staters.

Right? That’s right. And, you know, in terms of the appearance of justice, whether or not they are otherwise, you know, oh, they may have a whole bunch of perfect staff, but the American people have lost confidence in both agencies. And, you know, I was talking to Marjorie Taylor Greene on the way out. You know, she made the point her constituents are upset about this. And, you know, our friends in the administration want to blame me or Marjorie or others for highlighting these issues and getting people riled up. It’s like, are you kidding me? People instinctively know what’s going on.

They don’t need Tom Fitton or MTG or Steve Bannon to tell them what to think. Donald Trump doesn’t need any of us to tell him what to think. So this is, this is a grassroots concern about the lack of justice and accountability. And, you know, and frankly, our friends in the DOJ and FBI are giving us the equivalent of Q drops every week. Oh, don’t trust, trust us. There’s a plan. We’re going to roll them all up. There’s a plan. There’s no plan. There may be a prosecution or two. There have been significant firings which, which are necessary but woefully insufficient.

And the President should tell Cash, treat FBI like us and in the meantime, treat USA FBI like usaid. You’re talking shatter and scatter. Shatter. You, you, you believe because It’s May of 2025, we’re burning daylight. I tell people, if, if the deep state is not shattered on Trump’s watch and destroyed, it’s going to come back. It’s going to come back bigger than ever. It’s got to be done. It’s got to be done now. I mean, I was, I was talking about online the other day. You went to jail for contempt of Congress. Pete Navarro went to jail for contempt of Congress.

Garland wasn’t prosecuted by the Justice Department. Why? You know, he hid these, the video he hit, he hid the audio of the Biden interview because they covered up his mental incapacities by keeping that video, that audio quiet. He refused and went into contempt of Congress rather than turn it over. Why isn’t the bonding Justice Department prosecuted him? I mean, it’s right there, There’s a package right there from the prior administration. They can re evaluate and review and decide whether to prosecute or not. And as I was saying at the beginning of the show, it’s now time I would suggest respectfully to the president that if he wants this done, he should just do it, order it, get it done.

Because they’re going to. Even if the two departments could do it, which clearly they’re overwhelmed, the media is going to and the Democrats are going to make the same firestorm. So just go ahead and set it up yourself. It’s within the Constitution, is within your constitutional rights. Let’s get on with it. No, and it also feels checks in place. The. You know, it’s not like he’s going. We’re not going to have judges pretending to be the president. You know, we’re not going to have the equipment which we have now. We have now. You know, that’s, that’s the tyranny the founders were worried about.

Here. The president is acting as magistrate and prosecutor. And when you look at president and people should go and look this up, look at President Washington’s handling of the Whiskey Rebellion. I mean, Mike, you wouldn’t want to be. You didn’t want to be on the wrong end of George Washington. First off, people don’t know that Hamilton. Hamilton. Washington actually came back and they, they formed a standing army, made Hamilton a major general and is. Washington was going to come back and do the going to be commander in chief again. He talked about the vigorous prosecution Adams did and Jefferson, as I said, ran.

The Aliens Eminem act that we’re using came from that time in 1798. President Jackson, Roosevelt used Teddy conducted antitrust prosecutions or ran them. President Reagan shut down a prosecution over national security concerns. So this is, you know, and I remember talking to a senior person in the, in the prior White House, the Trump White House, someone who’s not seen as a friend of the president anymore, but a very former senior official. And he said to me, Tom, after all this is done, we need to bring the Justice Department back into our government. And what an insight that was.

And it’s. And it’s true. And it’s still true. And let’s stop. Let’s stop giving the left control of the Justice Department. And, and my theory, my working narrative is our working narrative should be we need to reassert political control of the administrative state or as the left likes to say, over the administration. Political control of the administration state or as the left likes to call it, democracy. Yes. What. What is your top. You’ve sued now the administration. I mean, I can’t believe I’m saying this. Fenton, who’s worked for years on this thing and was. We called the people’s Justice Department during Obama that if it hadn’t been for you, I don’t know where this country would have been.

You were the one group that was in Obama’s freedom of information request suing Holder, the whole thing force and Holder Olmson to a contempt charge over the gun running situation. It was all you. How many times have you actually sued the current Trump administration? Oh, it’s got to be 10 or 12 times. How could that possibly. I mean, this is what’s so mind boggling with Tom Fenton suing. What are we doing? Why? Well, in defense of the Trump administration, you know, fish swim, judicial watch. So we don’t get a response to our foia. We don’t wait around for some politicos to say, hey, you know, here are the documents.

Shouldn’t they be instantaneously say, hey, the people want this information released because President Trump has said, hey, I want all, you know, declassify the stuff, get all this stuff out here? Yeah, I mean, FOIA is a great way to get information out and I think they should focus on that. And I would see the lawsuits and FOIAs as opportunities for disclosure rather than legal headaches. What is your punch list for the special prosecutor? Since they gave pardons to Fauci, they gave pardons to. The pardons are invalid. Special prosecutors should proceed as if those pardons aren’t valid.

They don’t name. We’re making, we’re making some news. They don’t give me that again. They’re saying the pardons are a total joke in the first place. They’re null and void. Remember they taught us about the empty set when we were learning the null set. Yeah. This is the pardons are the empty set. There are no crimes in them. What is it? How is it you even manage that? And now, of course, there’s questions about how they were even, you know, granted. But this is another matter. Auto pen. But you can’t have a pardon for nothing. And you know, under that theory, the blanket preemptive pardons and Tom Fitton, a special prosecutor, step one, they’re gone.

Yeah, we’re going after the J6. We’re going to get them prosecuted. You see it as if they’re not there. Now, does it mean you target someone who otherwise wouldn’t have been? No, but you investigate the crimes associated with these individuals, bring them in, question them, and in theory, frankly, you can. Even if they’re valid, you can prosecute them and convict them and the pardon kicks in at sentencing. In other words, you go all the way through the trial show that they’re, show they’re guilty, and then it’s sentencing if this pardon is still valid. You debated at that point now, now, Steve, admittedly, this is going to be a tough sell to a lot of the Trump administration, but this is, the approach won’t be a tough sell to Trump.

Right. This is, this is, this is pure Trump. Maybe some folks, you know, that’s in and out of the room, but not to him. But this is, this is a sort of a kind of aggressive thinking, I think is appropriate. We’re in an emergency situation. These agencies and the people that we’re talking about here tried to destroy the republic, tried to kill and jail Trump. He, he’s, he’s called, I think, seven national emergencies. You’re saying the emergency against the deep state is every bit as a danger to the national security of this republic, and it’s an emergency and you have to do this.

Yeah, we lost, we almost lost our country, not because of the border invasion, but because of what they were doing to Trump. And that’s what separates us from Russia and China. You know, it doesn’t separate us from France because France doesn’t allow that type of abuse. Hang on for one second. Tom Fitton’s in the, in the House. Mike Lowell. We’re going to talk about the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, the great Ed Martin, next in the world. Fenton, Huge news over the weekend. And, folks, this is why Tom Fitton is a national treasure. You stepped into the breach when nobody else would to make sure we got justice, at least on the civil side, for Ashley Babbitt.

Huge announcement over the weekend. We don’t know the details. What can you tell us? You guys sued him for 30 million bucks? The Justice Department. Yeah, we sued the federal government for $30 million wrongful death. We’re representing her family, her husband Aaron, her estate, and, you know, long story short, we had this unusual court hearing on Friday in which we, the government and Judicial Watch on behalf of Ashley’s family, had to disclose that the settlement was, has been agreed to in principle. So the next step is there’ll be, essentially, it has to be finalized and something needs to be signed.

And so the details as to the amount and other details, yeah, that will come out. So. But we’ve agreed to it in principle and it’s a great victory for the family. Great victory against the fake January 6th narrative. It blows out of, out of the water. The big lie on January 6th. Ashley was the only official homicide victim that day. And they tried their best to cover it up and we blew it out of the water. In terms of exposing the protection of Byrd, he was put up in a hotel on Andrews Air Force Base. They literally had the Defense Department helping protect this officer.

He had a record that makes me think he shouldn’t have been nowhere near the Capitol, let alone not even allowed to have a gun. And he popped out and shot this guy. And the people around Ashley yelled, you murdered her. You murdered her. Cold blood. You guys stepped up. Tremendous victory. You’re also going after the IRS in defense of J6ers. Yeah, I mean, we haven’t released this yet, but the IRS was targeting, I don’t remember, I don’t remember the name of a group, a group that was providing support for the January 6th defendants and targets. So what does the IRS do? They do what, you know, left wing run IRS is always do they target the political opposition.

So we asked for records about the targeting. We got the proverbial hand to the face. So hopefully the Trump appointees and or the IRS bureaucrats running the agency think better of it now that we’ve sued and start releasing information about this, what looks to be political targeting. I’ve never mentioned this, but everything else. I also got an audit during those days. Never said it before, Fenton, but you can bring it out of it because you’re fighting. No, it was so corrupt. This is why Scott Betts in the new crew over there is fantastic. But these people are corrupt up to there.

They tried to break these people. Everything that possibly could happen to patriots, they tried to do the worst in the world. One gentleman that’s going to set that right. Tom, as you and I have talked about, it’s Ed Martin who’s up to be the U.S. attorney. And you know how bad Graves was here in the District. Mike Howell now joins us from over at Heritage. Mike, walk me through. And I don’t understand why this is even a controversy. Mike, what is going on here with Ed Martin as being the new U.S. attorney for the District? So Ed Martin was appointed by President Trump at the start of the administration to be the U.S.

attorney. He gets to be in that job for 120 days, which ends on May 20. He has done a bang up job on the central plank of Trump’s mandate to clean up Washington D.C. and restore law and order. He has gone after people carrying illegal guns. He’s gone after people going after the cops. He’s gone after a whole bunch of folks that his previous or predecessors successor Matthew Graves, used that office solely to focus on January 6, 1600 cases. So Ed’s turn it in to a law enforcement operation overnight. Now here’s the issue. If the Senate Judiciary Committee does not notice his hearing today for a Thursday hearing, then there is not enough time for him to get confirmed by the Senate by May 20.

So the Senate has a choice. Either they can reject President Trump’s law and order mandate man by letting him timeout, which then could lead to a fact pattern where Judge Boasberg gets to pick his replacement. And so we hope that does not happen. I do not think the Senate will take out President Trump’s favorite U.S. attorney who’s doing a bang up job, but we’ll know the answer to that question tonight. So the Senate Judiciary, which has Cornyn on it, Tillis on it, some other folks like that on it, they have to agree with Grassley just to set a hearing.

This is not voting in favor right now of Ed Martin. Just, just to notice that a hearing is going to take place or the, or that because it’s not a public hearing, a I guess the paperwork to go back and forth because on 20th of May he times out from his, his interim or temporary appointment. Is that, is this the problem we got? That’s absolutely right. The decision on whether to notice the hearing for Thursday is Grassley’s alone. But he has to do that three days before Thursday, which is tonight. So the question is whether he’ll do that over some objections that other Senate Republicans on the Judiciary Committee may have.

It’s important to note that none of them have said publicly they would not vote for Ed Martin. And so our hope is that Senator Grassley, the chairman, moves forward, puts us on the books for Thursday and does not allow a situation where others in the caucus can agree with Schumer, Durbin and Schiff and all of their lies, slanders and, and slurs to let Ed time out in the dark of night. USA Martin deserves a vote. He is Trump’s favorite U.S. attorney. He is doing a bang up job. Let’s keep him in it. Crime is, correct me if I’m wrong, crime is down 25% in the district since Ed Martin took over.

And I can tell you because the war room is on Capitol Hill right near the Supreme Court, you can feel it in the neighborhood that things are much quieter and you feel better just having ed Martin as U.S. attorney. Is that correct, Mike? How? Oh, it’s absolutely correct. And it’s projected to, you know, get even better what he’s doing to go after, you know, the juvenile crime, the gun crime, the carjacking not to mention the Hamas rioters that he’s already locked up the graffiti once. And we’re gearing up for a very hot summer. You see what’s happening with political violence picking up.

If we don’t have a lawman confirmed in this job in the nation’s capital for this summer, we’re in big trouble. And not to mention, the 250th anniversary of the United States of America is coming up. Pretty soon, all eyes will be on Washington, D.C. trump wants his city cleaned up. He wants Ed Martin to do it, and he is doing it. So hopefully the Senate does not, for an unprecedented manner, take out Trump’s U.S. attorney. They gave Matthew Graves a voice vote. No Republican objections. They gave Eric Holder, when he had the job, a voice vote.

Not to mention Republican senators voted for, you know, Merrick Garland, Mayorkas and other just terrible nominees. This is unprecedented. If they are not too advanced at Martin. That’s why I don’t think they’ll do it. Well, folks need to call the Senate to be clear. 202 to 25, 3121. Senator Tillis needs a special attention. He did a good job promoting Cash Patel. There are concerns he’s not as excited about Ed Martin. But let’s go. The left isn’t opposing Ed Martin because he wants less crime in D.C. in fact, they kind of want less crime in D.C. too, because they live here.

But the rest of you, they don’t care about. The left opposes Ed Martin because they’re afraid he will pursue the lawfare that was abused to target Trump. Chuck Schumer has been personally going after Ed Martin with senators. I’ve heard, remember Ed Martin asked Schumer tough questions about his threats to Supreme Court Justices. Adam Schiff has personally got involved in targeting Ed Martin as well. That tells you everything you need to know about why they fear Ed Morgan. Some of the worst of the worst in the Senate. I mean, Adam Schiff is the worst member of Congress currently serving in terms of ethics and maliciousness.

Oh, terrible. Mike out your recommendation. We got the Article 3 project under Mike Davis. We got the Bill Blaster under Grace. We’ve got everybody ready to talk to Senate Judiciary today. What is your recommendation, sir? Let your senators on the Judiciary Committee particularly know that Ed Martin is the right man to make D.C. safe and deliver Trump’s mandate. And if we don’t advance this by tonight, we effectively turn over the Senate to Schumer, Schiff and Durbin’s hands. At a time where reconciliation and everything else is on the table. It is not the time to divide. It is the time to unite and advance.

U.S. attorney Martin and make D.C. safe and beautiful again. How where do people get you? What’s your social media where they go at? It’s your gov is the oversight project Sandal and that’s because it is your government. And that’s what we why we fight for you so hard. And I’m at MHOW tweets. We’ll be giving out updates and encouraging everyone to stand up and stand behind USA Martin and to push President Trump’s mandate. Man in Washington D.C. thank you, brother. Appreciate you. Your plan is amazing. Where do people go to find out more about it? Are we and we’re we’re now officially pushing this, right? Oh, I’ve been talking about it.

I mean I talked about it with you a few weeks ago. I’m not, I’m not like a secret guy. It’s like this is what needs to be done. Special prosecutor needs to be announced by President Trump. Reports directly to the president at the White House. Maybe he can appoint himself special prosecutor. I say half jokingly, you would actually he can hang on. Can you hang through the break? Holman’s doing a gaggle. We’re going to figure this all out. We’re going to have a shirt. Izzy, can we. Let’s go to Tom Holman at the sticks or have a US Citizen child.

If you have one petition for you in the future, leave yourself open to the opportunity of legal entry. Do things the right way. There’s millions of people standing in line right now. The doing things the right way, taking the test, doing the background investigations, paying their fees. They’re sitting in the back seat. While millions of people are allowed into this country under Biden administration that simply don’t qualify for asylum. Most of them will lose that asylum claim. So while they clocking up the whole system, in addition to those who want to come in legally, while the fraudulent millions of fraudulent asylum claims under Biden administration, there are people in this world world who really are escaping fear and persecution from their homeland.

But they’re sitting in the back seat too because millions of people cheated the system. Come across the border, releasing the United States. That caused a significant backlog in immigration court. And that wasn’t by accident. It’s by design. Let’s just overwhelm the system. So it takes five, seven, nine years to go through the whole process. If they take advantage of the appeals process process, they know exactly what they’re doing. That’s why they weren’t in ICE detention, because in ICE detention they get a hearing within 35 days. But for at least millions of the country overwhelm the system so they don’t get a hearing in five, seven, nine years, then maybe there’s a Democrat administration in power now.

We can have an amnesty. They know exactly what they’re doing. They’re playing the long game. But we’re going to beat them out. We’re going to ramp up interior enforcement operations and removals. We’re going to enforce the law. We’re not going to ignore the law like the prior administration did. The president says he doesn’t know what his responsibilities are under Article 5 of the Constitution. Who would it be would educate him about that? Would it be you? I think the president is one of the, if not the most knowledgeable president that we’ve ever had. Look, people can beat on President Trump all you want.

President Trump’s a game changer. I worked for six presidents, starting with Rich Ronald Reagan. I’m a border guy. Even President Clinton. Obama took steps to secure the border because they understood you can’t have national security if you don’t have border security. No one didn’t warn President Trump during his first administration. We handed the Biden administration the most secure border in my lifetime and he purposely unsecured it. First president in the history of the nation to do that. Look at what President Trump achieved in eight weeks. He did in eight weeks with Joe Biden. Biden couldn’t and wouldn’t do in four years.

We have the most secure border in the history of this nation right now because of President Trump. Greatest president of my lifetime. You can quote me on that. That’s Holman right there. What did Homan just say? Remember, the langford bill was 2 million a year until anything kicked in. Trump shut it all down in 60 days. Tom Ho. Now they’re talking about a new incentive program to get deported. I mean, they got to get out like 5,000 people a day just to reverse the invasion. I’m telling you, the 10 million. This is why they’re trying to make it so difficult now.

Thank you for coming by. This is one of the busiest guys in D.C. i just want to reiterate the Fenton recommendation to the President of the United. To our chief magistrate and chief law enforcement officer, which be the guy that occupies the Oval Office. You’re recommending a appointment of a special prosecutor, special counsel. You’re saying if you go back and look at the Constitution and by custom and tradition, that you believe that President Trump should Keep open the possibility of appointing himself maybe with a Matt Gaetz as a deputy. Is that what I’m hearing? Or Jeff Clark or Rudy.

He could bring Rudy back in as a deputy. He’s, he’s as sharp as attack and has more experience. I love this so much. I just got to, I want to make sure you and I are. Because we go back a long way. We’re not trolling here. This is serious. Because when he said Trump is special prosecutor Gates, Clark, Rudy, they’re literally going to explode. They’re going to lose. The point is I’m highlighting, you know, there’s, there’s kind of like, oh, that would be the perfect response. Right. But their response is short of that. And I’m highlighting for the, for your listeners and the American people, educating them on the powers of the presidency.

And Attorney General Bondi can get support from the president to get this done. He can like short of this, just direct the attorney general to engage in the criminal investigations and any resulting prosecutions and manage it as closely as he wants. This fake news, this fake constitutional construct that the left is stuff down our post, post war to justify their attacks on Nixon, a total lie is, is, is not only a lie, but it’s a dangerous lie because it gives that awesome power of prosecution to unelected bureaucrats or people who aren’t subjected to the checks the founders intended to have in place.

Meaning that the president running the show, very powerful Tom Finn and once again a big focus that should be on the administrative and the deep state to focus this because we’ve got a one time shot that’s got, that is one of the, you believe the most significant threat to this republic. Well, we had a collusion and abuse of power to undo a presidential election. An attempt to undo a presidential election or rig it in 2024. And part of that was not only the actual rigging by putting the candidate in jail and constraining him during the campaign, but also to curtail any questions or election integrity activity by the opposition by suggesting anyone who does that will go to jail.

And that’s why they criminalized the First Amendment and executive power related under the Constitution. As far as the president was concerned, activities questioning the 2020 election, it was about making sure those people wouldn’t show up on 2024 at 2024 and raise questions. And it didn’t work. It didn’t work because groups like Judicial Watch, we weren’t cowed. Trump wasn’t cowed. The American people rejected it outright. And you know, they tried but they failed. And it doesn’t mean they won’t try again. And they will try again unless there are consequences. And certainly not. Doing an investigation is not what the American people expected out of this Justice Department and FBI.

And I’m. Now they say maybe there’s something going on secretly we don’t know about. And that just sounds very cute, like, to me. And I don’t buy it. It’s also too. I mean, because those buildings haven’t changed, it’ll take you a while to change them. You got to get on with this. Your point is exactly. Pam and Cash are. They got so much going on and those buildings aren’t with them. So best that just be some marginal thing. This is where he said it’s the reason for being. The spirit special prosecutor is solely to do this and to report to the President directly.

It lifts the burden from the FBI and Justice Department so Cash can spend his time decimating the FBI, shuttering it so that the only people left are him and a skeleton crew. I think you and I totally agree on this. FBI has got to be broken apart, right? There’s shattered. There’s nothing the FBI does that can’t be done by another federal agency. Better. And with more focus. Tom Fenton, where do you go for social media? Amazing. Well, we’re@judical watch.org and I’m all over social media. Where did they get all your social media? Is it your account or social? It’s both.

It’s Judicial. Judicial Watch on X, at TomFitton. Similarly on Rumble, YouTube, Facebook. You know, we’re everywhere. And. And this is what drives the left crazy. It’s because we know what we’re talking about. We’ve got some of the best lawyers in the country working on our cases, whether it be on election integrity. I mean, the work we did on the Ashley Babbitt case is unbelievable. You know, I was thinking about all these crazy law firms out there that Trump, you know, highlighted their anti American approaches. We’ve been doing this work for 30 years. Not once have we received pro bono legal help from any of these giant law firms.

Not once. Incredible. And the left gets it all the time. Yeah. But we do it anyway. Thank you for Ashley Babbitt and that incredible victory after victory. Tom, the great Tom Fenton. Do I have Jillian up? Do I have poso? Okay, Jack’s getting ready. We’re going to get to Jack Bosovic in a second. The great Tom Fitton was here, joined us this morning. They announced and announced the details later on the Ashley Babbitt the Ashley Babbitt settlement which Dishes Watch worked so hard for.
[tr:tra].

See more of Judicial Watch on their Public Channel and the MPN Judicial Watch channel.