And it was nuts. I was like, wow, this is crazy because I’d never literally lived in the mountains where I am in California. It’s about. I think we’re about 2900ft, but we don’t get that much snow here. I think we’ve had one or two really severe snows in my lifetime. But when I was actually. I lived a little bit of time in Virginia and then that time in Arizona and I still actually still maintain Arizona residency.

But when I was in Prescott, that was nuts because I think the elevation is about five. It’s about a mile. It’s about a mile up. So we get some lot of snow up there. But anyway, enough about snow. We’re going to kind of deviate a little bit and veer into the new book that you just released. You want to tell us about it? Yes. It’s a little bit more contemporary history than what we normally talk about, which is good.

Everybody remembers this? Yes. The course 911 inside job. It’s available on Amazon now. And that’s a great cover. Great looking cover. That’s a beautiful looking cover. Yeah. Inside joke. Ron did the COVID for me. He whipped it up for me. But there it is. Crash course 911 inside job. And I modeled this similar to my previous work that came out three or four months ago. Crash course nwo.

So I’m moving away from the really larger books and going to the 60 to 80 page sweet spot. One because they take a lot out of me, but also because. Got a really good response to the crash course nwo. It seems people, there’s a real need and a demand to be able to get as much information as possible in a short, concise amount of time. It’s a go world we live in.

So this one’s about 70 pages, but again, it’s surprisingly comprehensive for the relatively small amount of pages and lots of pictures. I know a lot of people in our community are already familiar with the fact that 911 was an inside job and they know the basics of it. But for newbies. But even if people who are well versed in the 911 truth or movement are going to learn something here, I tried to pull out the best elements.

It really makes the case anybody who reads this book and then still doesn’t question the official story, those are the people who are like gone. There’s no help for them. Those are the people Q talked about. What did he say? It’ll be like 20% we can’t help. Something like that. Something like that, yeah, for everybody. Or something along those lines. Speaking of, I think I shared it with you.

Did you see the tweet that Biden did or. Yeah. With the eyes or whatever. That was a little crazy. That was. Because that’s something that Trump often uses. Yeah. And that’s the same one. So maybe he’s channeling through him. That was a verified account, right? That’s actually. That was. Yeah. Yeah. Which means they’ve commandeered it, of course. And so now you have to ask, why are the whiteouts putting out that kind of.

So that’s, that’s know the comms keep coming. Putin the other day taking off his watch, placing it on the table, just like one of the Q posts, stuff like that. That’s right. Yeah. He did that exactly 17 seconds into the interview with Tucker Carlson. 17, meaning Q. He just paused and it was just weird. You know what? I didn’t catch that. Yeah. That’s interesting. Yeah, it is. It’s clearly a deliberate gesture.

I mean, who removes their watch while they’re talking to you? Yeah. At 17 seconds in. Yeah, I’m waiting for the action. I mean, these communications, after a while, they’re cute, but it’s like, all right, let’s get to the show. But it will come. The fireworks will come. Somebody asked, what does the watch signify? I believe in the cue post, the watch was placed on a desk next to a pen.

And I think the significance lies in the numbers. One hand is on the ten. I’m not sure. I think it was ten and two. Yeah. So it’s going to be one of those things where future proves past. Maybe one day something will happen and we’ll see. Okay, there it is. But up until now, I don’t think anyone’s really decoded that. Right. Everybody was talking about. Well, it was follow the pen as you kept putting the watch next to the pen.

And it was follow the pen. And anyway, there’s so much there. There’s so much there. But anyway, that’s for another time. Not to derail too much, we’re going to talk tonight about the new book that Mike wrote. So you want to go ahead? And the floor is yours, my friend. Okay. Again, that’s crash course 911, inside job, available at Amazon. And then all my other stuff is at the website realnewsandhistory.

com. But everything is relevant in history that we talk about, whether it’s World War I, World War II, Kennedy. But the more far removed you get, the less relevant it seems. 911 is still directly relevant and most of us were alive and remember it clearly. And it’s such a fraud. And it’s such an easily refutable, debunkable hoax that it’s still an effective weapon to wake people up. Agreed.

That’s what this is. It’s really a weapon. I just don’t see how someone can look at this and not say, oh, my God, deep state blew up the twin towers. There’s no question about it. But right off the bat, instead of making it like a mystery, I just say right off the bat, first section, who really did 911 and why? And I talk about the globalist. This was something to advance their one world order.

They wanted to subdue Central Asia, and it worked hand in hand perfectly with the zionist agenda. They wanted to expand Israel. So it’s wars in the Middle east, wars in Central Asia, and as always, the american people don’t want to go to war. You have to give them a phony pretext and a boogeyman, and that’s what this was. So I state that right off the bat. Who did 911? And why is my opening paragraph, it says, let’s get this question out of the way right from the beginning.

Okay, so who did it? Answer the usual suspects. Specifically, that global mafia we refer to as the cabal or the nwo, new world order. At the core of this effort is an immense and intricate network of bankers, media moguls, political operatives, academics, and intelligence agencies. What’s different now, Ron, than, say, 20 years ago, 15 years ago, even ten years ago, is today. When you start talking about globalists and the one world in Cabal, a lot more people have heard these terms now.

Yes. Okay. Whether they agree with it or not. And this kind of begins to make sense, especially, like, within, say, the Trump MAGA community, who are not conspiracy students, okay? Correct. For them to come across something like this, you would not have been able to present this ten years ago, even five years ago. Now you start saying globalists did it because we’ve seen so much dirt and nefarious, dirty activities carried out by the deep state aimed at taking down Trump.

So now when the MAGA folks will read something like this, it’s going to make a lot more sense to be a lot more open to it. And actually, I opened the book with a quote right off the bat. Nobody has ever gotten to the bottom of 911, unfortunately, and they should have. As to the maniacs who did that horrible thing to our city, to our country and the world, President Donald Trump, July 2023.

Trump said that. So this is your first icebreaker. We’ve got to fully inform the MAGA normies, okay? These are people that, with us, they’re hardcore. They’re excited about Trump. They know something’s wrong, but they haven’t quite gone too far down the rabbit hole. So that’s really my target audience with this. Right. What would you attribute the mass awakening to? If you had to give just a brief, quick answer, what would you attribute the mass awakening know to be open to the conspiracy thing, what would you attribute that to? A combination of things, primarily Trump’s own words.

He’s always talking about the deep states and how they’re plotting against them. And then there’s the things that people just observe. All these hoaxes, the Russia hoax, and all of these attempt, the impeachment and all the big names and the people in Hollywood, no one’s ever seen anything like this unless they were alive when Joe McCarthy was pursuing communists. But even him, he got it 100th of what Trump got.

I don’t think there’s anything like this in american history, quite frankly, or this protracted. I mean, there have been spurts. I remember when they went after know even in the early days when they threw all their filth at Reagan, but nothing like this, not in american history, that I can certainly remember in my lifetime. But even, like, reading about history, I don’t know of any other case of a political figure having so much filth, dishonest filth, thrown at them.

And yes, there’s an element of population that bought it hook, line, and sinker, but there’s about half the country who are just bewildered by it. They never see anything like it before. So that has stoked their suspicions now, because they see it. They see the dirt and all the plots against them. Open plots. Agree? Yeah, I would actually inject that. If you ask my opinion on there, I would say that while I do believe that what you’re saying is right, at least from a Normie standpoint, that’s a lot more slow burn.

I would say that the queue operation did a lot more to get people to be open to the conspiracy stuff than anything up to that point. Because I’ve been awake for a long time, and I have never seen a geometrically increase, a geometric increase of awake people until Q started posting in October or November of 2017. 2018 and 2019, I saw just, it was an exponential increase in people who were open to the idea of conspiracy stuff, and there was a lot of people who still didn’t buy into it.

And then that was when the normies that had to get the slow burn, that was when they saw it with the Covid operation, with all this other stuff with the election, so many people woke up a little bit slower. But I would say that Q had a significant impact in opening people’s minds. Just my, in its, in its heyday before Facebook and Twitter and so on, we moved everything.

YouTube. Right. There were Q influencers, had hundreds of thousands of followers. That was not uncommon. Correct. It was big and that’s exponential. And then they influence people and then it seeps into the broader Maga community. Yes. There’s a lot of normies on our side. They’re not like liptard normies, but they’re still, in a sense, they’ve got to know this stuff. And once you get, let’s say you get all the Trump people understanding this, you’re going to eventually reach a point of critical mass.

And I hope that at the end of the line, this gets exposed. And I quote in here from Trump, he’s given us numerous hints and so is Q, that 911 truth will be brought forward. Yes, he has something like this. This is like probably second only to the so called holocaust in terms of collapsing the whole house of cards if you expose it, but even more so because it’s still recent and still fresh, something like this gets exposed.

Now the minds of everybody are completely wide open to expose every other lie we’ve been told for the last hundred, 200 years, even. Well, and I think the COVID hoax is going to be, I think that may even lead to a lot more as well, because that’s big, that’s even more recent. Right? And not only that, but it’s going to be impactful because people have lost loved ones.

People lost loved ones that they couldn’t go see in the hospital. And then when they find out that all that stuff was a fraud, then thing with the vaccines and all that stuff, and that the protocols murdered the people in the hospital, that has to come out. Otherwise, what are we doing? Right? What are we doing? Just exposing, like, corruption. I mean, that’s great. Everything’s got to come out.

We don’t know that it is 100% until it does. And all the indicators point that way, but we’ll have to see. But this is a big one. Yeah, this is a very big one. But that was just a little bit of a rabid trail. But bringing it back to the 911, to the book here. So you’ve got the first one, you’ve got the usual suspects. And then I’ve got, I always like to incorporate mainstream news headlines into my work.

Here’s Harett’s Israel headline report, Netanyahu says 911 terror attacks were good for Israel. This is several years after the fact, right? Indeed they were. There was immediate sympathy for Israel and it was, what, a year to year and a half later, there we were in Iraq fighting Yahoo’s war. I mean, that was the plan. Iraq, Lebanon, Syria. It failed. It ultimately failed. But it’s clear that was the israeli agenda.

And then, as with all my other works, when I write about historical event, I like to go into historical precedents. Because if you don’t understand precedents, you don’t understand the present day. Because greedy. Once something has happened, somebody has done something, then you know what they’re capable of, both morally and logistically. So my next caption is. July 22, 1946. Zionist terrorists bombed the King David hotel. So what happened? Well, now, this is after World War II.

The British are still controlling the area. They had allowed jewish immigration there after they stole it from the turkish empire and made Palestine the british mandate. Right. And now the ungrateful jewish settlers, their position was, okay, thanks, but now you got to get out. So they wanted to chase the British out and they committed terror attacks. The British. And if you look at the pictures of the collapse of King David hotel, it’s controlled demolition of a wing of the hotel.

So they rigged it and it was all ready to blow. And then someone got suspicious and they spotted them. And there was an actual shootout between british officers in the hotel because that’s where the british headquarters was. And some people dressed in arab outfits. They were Israelis. So that’s your other precedent. So now you have a partial control demolition terror attack, and the perpetrators are dressed up as Arabs.

But they’re not Arabs, they’re Israelis. Right? Kind of like the ISIS fighter who’s wearing the Star of David around his neck. There you go. Yeah. So that’s very important precedent. And a bunch of British were killed. And this was one of the main factors contributing to the british decision to finally say, let’s just get the hell out of here. Okay. They washed their hands and now it belonged to the Israelis.

And the state of Israel was declared. So the moral of the story, they like to blow up buildings with control demo. And they like to blame it on Arabs. They didn’t get away with blaming it on the Arabs because they got caught in the process. But they detonated right after the shootout. So they did detonate. But that was the intention was to do it and leave the Arabs taking the blame.

Key precedent. Yeah. And I’m looking at the book. The british arrest score of Jews as terrorists, hotels bomb. And this is actually a. I’m going to share the screen just so that people can see this temporarily here. Let me see here. Here we go. That’s the Fitchburg Sentinel. Yeah. That’s the british arrest score of Jews as terrorists, hotel bombers dressed as Arabs. Eyewitness states 48 known dead. A very interesting indeed.

Yeah. And then next on the list is you’ve got the liberty. Israel murders 34 us sailors on the USS Liberty. Again, very important precedent to establish what they’re capable of and what they can cover up. So they attacked the USS Liberty at the very beginning of the 1967 six day War, and their intent, as you know, was to sink the liberty, kill all the american sailors, and then leave Egypt to take the blame.

So now their boy LBJ would have had the pretext to take us to war on Israel’s behalf for this false flag operation. They were not able to sink the ship and kill all the survivors, which was their intent, because there were ships in the area that got wind of it. I think the closest one was a russian ship. So at some point they called off the attack, and they later said, oh, we’re sorry, we thought it was an egyptian vessel.

Total nonsense. I think even recently there are some tapes declassified. The israeli pilot reported, said, no, it’s an american ship. He was reluctant to follow the orders, but he had to. It was broad daylight, the american flag was flying. That guy, if I’m not mistaken, that guy actually was. He was in an american prison. And then something happened and he got released and he was actually afraid for his life.

If it’s the same guy I’m thinking of, that he was, somebody was in an american prison, into Springfield, Illinois, or, I’m sorry, Springfield, Missouri. And anyway, he got released, but he was like, terrified. He didn’t want to get released. He wanted protection. And, yeah, he got released and was never seen again. Well, that’s not surprising. But the even bigger lesson, more so than the attack, was the fact that the following day, I have access to old archives in New York Times, so I could go back to any date I want and read the whole paper.

And you go back. The attack took place on June eigth, 1967. You could check the New York Times, the paper of record, June 9, June 10, June 11. Nothing. Not even buried in the back pages. They didn’t even put a little like one liner in the middle of the paper. Really absolute zero coverage. 34 us sales murdered. Okay. You would think this would be on the front page.

Okay. Nothing. Same for the Washington Post. Total blackout that continues to this day. So the other precedent, then, is we know what they’re capable of in terms of mass murder and cruelty, also in terms of framing their opponents. Okay, that’s two precedents. But most importantly, this shows the kind of power they have to bury a story, because most normies, their mentality is such. They reason. I never heard that.

It wasn’t in the news. How can that be true? I didn’t hear it on the news. That’s how they think. But this shows that they can erase what I call the memory hole from Georgia Orwell’s 1984. Yes, they can take a huge story like this and make it disappear. 34 us sailors murdered in broad daylight by an israeli attack. Jet fighters and torpedo boats, and I don’t know how many wounded, and just nothing.

There’s one to show the anti conspiracy theorists when they say, oh, you could never cover something like that up. Nothing on the New York Times. There’s a question in the chat, and I think it’s a good question for this discussion. This is how long have the Kazarians owned all of the media in the United States? And you go back to when was Reuters sold? When did they take over Reuters? Because Reuters.

That was Paul Reuters, and that’s not even his real name. Dutch jew. That was 18. It was like 1870 or something like that. 1860s, I think. Yeah, that was big. And then there were several other big agencies in France, Holland. It was really systematic in the United States. I cover this in my book, the Bad War, because on the eve of World War II, the big four that constituted the mainstream media at that time were the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC radio, NBC radio, rather, and CBS radio.

There’s no tv, obviously. And all four were run by a single jewish gangster and started 1896. Adolf Oaks bought the New York Times, bought it on the cheap because there was a financial crash in 1893, which the usual suspects engineered advertising revenue to floor. They were able to buy the New York Times, which was founded by Henry Jarvis Raymond. They were able to buy it on a cheap 1896.

So they got the New York Times. And that’s so important. It’s not just the people that read the New York Times in the northeast, okay? It’s the fact that so many small, medium sized cities across the country feed off the New York Times stories on the wire. That’s why they call it the paper of record. That’s correct. And still to this day, it carries such undeserved esteem to it.

I mean, it did deserve it once. It was once a great paper before Oaks took it over and even in the early decades, they still published a lot of truth because they had to tread carefully. They couldn’t just go radical all at once. But it was a solid newspaper, but papers all. So it would spread. Who was it? I forget. Somebody said that the New York Times is the typhoid Mary of american journalism and it truly is.

That’s where the virus starts. So that was huge. 1896, jewish family and Oaks passed it on to his son in law, Solzberger, who married his daughter. And then it’s gone from that. Solzberger to his son, to his son to his son to the current. And it’s still closing years, one family. So that’s the New York Times, 1933. The chairman of the Federal Reserve, Eugene Meyer, steps down as chairman of the Fed and buys the Washington Post.

Again. This is the depression. Buys it on the cheap. He’s losing money on it, but you don’t care. He bought it for influence, you understand? And Washington Post is huge because it targets the political class in DC and to a lesser extent than the times. It also spreads the poison across the country. Yes. So now you got Solzberger at the Times, Eugene Meyer, whose daughter, Catherine Meyer, we know her as Catherine Graham, ran it up until 1980, and then Donald Graham, her son, ran it up until about ten years ago, before it was before Bezos.

Yeah. So there you go, Sealsberger and the Times, Meyer and the Washington Post. Now, radio became a very important medium in the big. Every family eventually had one and they would listen to the news on the radio. Well, the king, the owner of NBC radio was Robert Sarnoff. 50 years, 50 year reign. I like the subtle coughing there. There you go, Sarnoff, russian born jew. Okay. And then there’s CBS radio, William Palof or William Paley as another 50 year run.

And then when they passed, it went to CBS, went to some near Redstone, NBC, went to his heirs, and then it went to another jewish mogul. So there’s your big four right there. And then later on came ABC, which was owned by Leonard Goldenson. Okay, then you have the new house chain, which owns papers in more medium sized cities all across the country. Newark, New Jersey, Trenton, New Jersey, the Portland Oregonian, the New Orleans Times.

Pick a yoon. So this was the new house family specialty. They would go into the country and then all of a sudden a paper like a Louisiana newspaper starts taking a leftist slant. All right? Something you would not expect to see in Louisiana. But that’s what happened. The Cleveland plane dealer, Conde Nas magazine, they’re huge today. They own cable companies. The new house family. So there it is.

From the first 30 years of the 20th century, you had the big four, the times to post ABC, CBS, and then later on it expanded. I have never really done a deep dive into their logos, but I mean, if you look at their logos now, very iconic and deliberate with the eyes, the CBS is the. But anyway, somebody wants to know if they can have your address to send you some coffee, some lozenges or something.

But anyway, but I hope that answered your question there. Yarn. That was a good question, and I thought it was apropos for what we’re dealing with, but moving on, now we’ve got, after the liberty, now we’ve got the advanced clues that put it right on our faces. Yeah, I believe 911 was like, such a big deal, playing long in advance. That’s the way they are. I mean, we know the COVID hoax dates back at least 15 years prior to when they launched it.

Okay, maybe that’ll be my next crash course. But all indicators are, it’s the same way with 911. And, you know, these are real creepy, sick people. They love it. It’s a certain sense of Duper’s delight. They’re telling you, well, they’re telling their fellow conspirators what’s going on, and they’re laughing about it like little evil children. And they’re also throwing it in our face as a form of a mockery.

And there’s so many of them. I just go into a few comic books, which is very heavily jewish. Kazarian run. It’s like Hollywood. Here’s one. X Men. It’s got the Twin Towers being blown up. 1985. Same year, Marvel Comics revenge of the living monolith. It’s a giant egyptian pharaoh knocking down the north tower. And that’s interesting because the so called ringleader of the so called hijackers, remember Mohammed Ata.

He was the know. So they had this script well in advance. Mario Brothers. I’ve got the pictures. You’ve got to get the book. Mario Brothers, the Simpsons album covers. So in your, you know, even if you could dismiss a few of them as well, it was just know the Twin towers are iconic, and that’s fine, but it’s so many, and it’s images of holes and fire that perfectly match the actual event.

There’s no question. There’s no doubt about it. They were telegraphing it. If any anti conspiracy terrorist wants to take the six examples that I provide and say, oh, that doesn’t mean anything, I can assure you. I could dig up 50. They’re all over the Internet. If somebody wants to Google Advanced signs or advanced clues of 911, like I said, even if you dismiss a few of them, you can’t dismiss all of them.

It’s impossible. They say, how many coincidences before it becomes mathematically, mathematically impossible. Here’s my favorite, if you can pull it up. New York magazine, real Estate 2001. This is in 2001, March. Is this in the book? It’s in the book. Page 13. Okay. Here, let’s. Yeah, top right. Top right. You see a woman. She’s covering her face. She’s terrified, but she’s showing the one eye. There’s your illuminati.

One eyeball. Okay. And then you look at the magazine. You can’t really see it. It’s a little hard because it’s small. I should have enlarged it, but the COVID says, real estate 2001. Is there life after the boom? Right in front of the twin towers. Okay. Is there life right after the boom? I mean, there it is. And the woman has just got this look of horror on her face with the one eyeball, and it’s just four or five months later, the building is blown up.

That’s crazy. Yeah. My next session, I go on to talk about the 1993 World Trade center bombing, which is very important to understand. And I’ve got reproduced an article here from the New York Times. This is how these little truth gems slip in. Sometimes tapes depict a proposal to thwart the bomb used in the trade center blast. There was an undercover arab fella working with the FBI, and he believes that he’s helping to set up, like, a sting operation of these terrorists who are to blow up the building.

And he tells know, he claims that the FBI didn’t switch out the bomb making materials. It was the plan. Here’s the quote. He says. I said, guys, now that you saw this bomb went off, and you both know that we could have avoided that. You guys get paid to prevent problems like this from happening. He went public, saying how he was working with the FBI and they set up the explosion.

It’s really astonishing that this leaked to the New York Times. First paragraph. Law enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade center. And they had planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives. An informer said after the blast, his name is Imad Salem, and he says he helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder.

But the plan was called off. So he was supposed to help them give the fake powder and then they called it off and they let them have the real power powder. And this was never followed up on again, but it’s in the New York Times. So in other words, 1993 was a false flag dress rehearsal orchestrated by the deep state, blew a massive hole in the foundation, but the tower withstood it.

And I don’t know if that was planned to withstand or not. So again, you talk about a big precedent there. Yeah, man. That’s one thing that I’ve never really delved too deeply into, was the 93 attack. But obviously, it’s important and probably something that nobody really, even myself included, really focuses on too much. But it’s a big deal. It’s a very big deal. And I think, obviously, for a foreshadowing of events to come, because when they do something, they never stop, they will always come back and continue to attack it.

They may have done 93 in order to psychologically prep us for 2001. Right? So then when it happens, it’s like, oh, they came back and they tried again. Because I have to believe if they really wanted to take the tower down, they would have known, they would have done the necessary calculations to provide enough force with the blast. But, yeah, that’s a big. 1993 was an inside job.

Yeah, well, anything of that large essence significance, and especially if it’s involving Middle Eastern terrorists. In my humble opinion, everything that is involving Middle Eastern terrorists is done on the inside. Because the Middle Eastern terrorist was the new boogeyman, Gladio B, that was all what Zignu Brzinski was all kind of setting the stage for. Back in the 70s. They were preparing for the inevitable collapse of the Soviet Union.

And the new boogeyman was going to be the Arabs or radical Islam. That was all radical Islam. It was all funded, know the intelligence agencies, just no different than what we’re dealing with now, because you don’t really hear too much about radical Islam anymore. It’s all about. It disappeared after Trump took their money. Right? And now it’s interesting, I got another New York Times headline I could show you.

It was six months into his presidency, five months into his presidency, he cut all the funding for the moderate rebels of Syria. That was ISIS. And then of course, there’s that executive order which enables him to seize assets of anyone involved in extreme corruption, et cetera. So he took their money. When’s the last time we heard of a so called islamic terror attack? They don’t happen anymore. Why is that? That just proves all along that it was fake.

It was the intelligence agencies. I don’t think there’s ever been a single terrorist attack that was truly islamic terrorists. Yeah, they may recruit patsies, yes, of course. But in terms of executing it, financing it, planning it, deep state, CIA, Mossad. Every time. Every time, the new terrorists are going to be the cartels. And once again, all funded. Know, I was going through a lot of the George Bush stuff the past couple of weeks.

And Bush’s fingerprints are all over cartel. The formation of the cartels. All over it. But anyway, I digress. Moving right along 1995 to 2001. The advanced insider warnings of 911. So in addition to all the symbolic stuff. That they teased us with or mocked us with. There were actual warnings. And what these warnings are about is really a way of alerting their fellow muckety Mucks within the conspiracy, okay? That’s how they talk to each other.

When they say there’s a threat of a Pearl harbor type attack. It’s like a wink wink to the inside crowd that this is what we’re planning. The other stuff is done to mock us, okay? It’s their satanic stuff of telegraphing. This is a way to communicate with each other. To a lesser extent, the general public. Because so many of us. These warnings appear in elite periodicals. Council on Foreign Relations, foreign affairs.

Nobody reads that stuff. Common people don’t read that stuff. The only people who read that are the high level muckety mucks. And there are so many of them. 1995, Netanyahu’s prophetic World Trade center terror warning. He wrote a book called Fighting Terrorism. Quote, what road should the United States and other democracies pursue. If they are to overcome the insidious international terror. Which produced the 1993 World Trade center bombing.

And which may very well produce another such tragedy? On another page, he writes, in the worst of such scenarios. The consequences could be not a car bomb, but a nuclear bomb in the basement of the World Trade center. Yeah. Indeed it was. I am of the opinion that that’s how they took the foundation out with nukes. I think they used a collection of explosives. There was the thermite has been proven and discovered.

And I also find the directed energy weapon theory very compelling as well. I think they just hit that thing from so many levels. But there you go, a nuke in the basement. And what do they call the site of the destruction? Ground zero. That is terminology from the detonation of atomic bomb. Ground zero. That’s mockery. Right in your face. Okay? The next book you mention is big Neo Brzinski.

Here he is, 1998, the grand chessboard. He goes on at length about how important it is that before Russia and China can get off their feet, we got to take control of Central Asia. It’s so critical to the geopolitical scheme. All those ex republics of the, you know, Kazakhstan, Kurzakhstan, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, he lays it all out. And then he says, comprehensive, integrated eurasian geostrategy is the purpose of this book.

How America manages Eurasia is critical. But then he’s lamenste the fact that it’s so hard to get the american public interested in this stuff. He says the public supported engagement in World War II because of the shock effect of the japanese attack on Pearl harbor. So he mentions Pearl harbor, he mentions a massive external prepping. And this is the same year where the character Osama bin Laden is introduced to the public.

He’s falsely accused of bombing two embassies in Africa. So there it is. Right on cue. They introduced the boogeyman. That was only a little dress rehearsal. These bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, but already they’re pounding the drums. Osama bin Laden, Osama bin Laden, sama bin Laden. So there. That’s a big one. Brzenski telling his fellow academics and politicians, elites telling them what’s coming. So there’s no doubt about that one, right? And I think.

What year was the coal bombing? Coal is in October of 2000, if I remember correctly. And I think. Didn’t they lay that? I think they tried to pin that on him, too. Yeah. So that was like a smaller one as well. These were intended just to plant seeds in the mind. It’s not the big show yet. Right. So by the time 911 rolls along, everybody has heard the name Osama bin Laden.

And that’s right, while the buildings before they’ve even collapsed, you already hear these. Well, this seems like the handiwork. Osama bin Laden and all the normies start in the neck. That’s all you heard. This is quite an operation. Yeah. Here’s another telegraphing council on Foreign Relations. They have their own magazine. It’s called foreign affairs. Article written by Ashton Carter, who was Obongo’s secretary of defense, Jan Deutsch, who’s later head of the FBI, and Philip Zelekal.

Yeah. The name of the article is imagining the transformative event, catastrophic terrorism. That’s actually the subtitle, catastrophic terrorism. Imagining the transformative event, an act of catastrophic terrorism, would be a watershed event in american history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s fundamental sense of security. Like Pearl harbor, this event would divide our past and future into before and after, the US might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force.

1998, okay, right about the same time as Brzezinski’s prophetic warning. What a shock. Move ahead to 2000, Peanac. This is one that more people know about. The neocons Project for the American Century. 90 page report, rebuilding America’s defenses. Saying that this process of rebuilding our defenses and establishing ourself overseas is going to be a long process, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl harbor. And that was this organization’s co founded by William Crystal and Robert Kagan.

Right? Husband of Victoria Newland. Yeah, exactly. Who started all that business in Ukraine. Here they are, the usual suspects. And here, actually, I’m going to share this here. This will be very apropos for what we’re talking about here. This is the COVID of that document. And you see the towers and the crosshairs. How about that? You know what? I’m sorry. This is not that. This is the emergency response to terrorism.

Self study from August of 1997. The US Department of Justice FEMA document with the towers and the crosshairs. I missed that one. I would have added it to this section. Yeah, but there you go. There’s another one. Anyway. But now here’s one for the general public, for the normies. All that stuff is for their fellow elites. The summer blockbuster movie hit of 2001 was Pearl harbor, starring Ben Affleck.

And that was hyped. That was hyped big time. And it was in the theaters July. I remember Pearl harbor. And then whoever didn’t see the movie, certainly you saw the previews. They were always on tv. They’re pounding us. Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor. Pearl harbor. The know, once you understand how interconnected Hollywood has always been with the deep state, this is going back to the days of the OSS, forerunner of the CIA in World War II.

I mean, they actually brought Hollywood people out to make films and make little lampshades with, they said were made out of the flesh of Jews. And they were at Nuremberg. They were manufacturing evidence. Hollywood. They were working with Eisenhower. So this is that far back to do fake news. So this was Hollywood’s contribution. So here we are. Now it’s almost time for the big day, and the public has been prepped.

Years and years of propaganda about this boogeyman, Osama bin Laden, plus all the other fake islamic terrorism events going back 2030 years. Okay, then you’ve got a movie like Pearl harbor. So as soon as it happens, people are, right away they’re thinking, oh, it’s the Muslims. Before even the talking heads. I’m talking as soon as the building is hit, maybe the first tower, I remember when it happened, I thought maybe it was an accident.

Of course, then when the second tower is hit, allegedly hit, everybody knew it was terrorism. I knew right away it was the usual suspects. Okay? And a lot of people don’t know this, but in World War II, there was a B 25. B 25 Mitchell, that straight off course, and it was in the fog, and it hit the Empire State Building. It’s not uncharacteristic of an aircraft hitting a building like that, because at the time, I think during World War II, wasn’t the Empire State Building the tallest building in the world? Yes, of course.

They actually discussed that in, it was a history channel documentary on the towers. And they actually talked about how this is before 911, and they talked about how that factored into the creation of the buildings, how they did the structure. And they said that it was so strong that it could withstand multiple strikes of 707, which was the largest aircraft of the day and still stand. Absolutely. An airplane.

It’s a hollow aluminum can. It’s gigantic, but it’s a hollow aluminum can, and you’re hitting solid steel. Okay, so you’re telling me if you take an empty coke can and you launch it at 300 miles an hour, it’s going to go through a manhole cover? I don’t think so. And Donald Trump was quick to point that out the very next day. There’s video of this on the Internet.

It was just dumbfounded. He said there had to have been explosives in that building. I mean, how could a plane, even the 747, penetrate that steel? Because the World Trade center had an exoskeleton. The steel was on the outside. And, I mean, the beams were as thick as redwood trees. You can’t penetrate that. The way that they constructed those buildings, it was unique. Up until that time, they wanted to make those buildings in such a way that there wouldn’t be.

If you look at buildings, most of the time there’s big beams all throughout the building. But with the World Trade center, you didn’t have that. All you had was you had beams on the outside and beams on the inside. And the center of the building was open space. And that was what made those buildings so unique, because you didn’t have all these columns at specific intervals that you’d have to almost like a slalom, if you will, that you didn’t have that.

And that was what made the building. So unique. But that was another reason why when you looked at the people that were looking out of the building, a lot of people jumped to their desk to their death. It was just tiny little slivers between all these massive columns, all these massive things of columns of steel, beams of steel. It was a very unique method of construction that they used, and it had never been done before.

And they said it was way stronger than almost any building in New York at the mean. And to your point, Trump has built skyscrapers in. He knows. He knows about the construction of a skyscraper. He knows about that. And it’s very complicated and complex. So he knew that something was off that that couldn’t have. Yeah, he knew right away. And personally, I think a combination of what they did to his friend JFK Jr.

In 99 and 911 probably pushed him over the edge or put him at the point where he was willing to do something if the military would back him up after 99. He actually ran for president in 2000. I remember that. Yeah. Reform party. I don’t think he had the military behind him at the time. Maybe he did, but this kind of infrastructure wasn’t in a way. And I think they realized back then, we’ve got to do this through the so called two party system.

But I think that really upset him. And he knew, and it was multiple interviews. He said this, and he was kind of adamant. He wasn’t saying government was involved or anything, but he was saying, this can’t be. He was just in disbelief over what had just happened. And he explained it. He’s knowledgeable in this area. He explained that this is built with an exoskeleton. He says, like a giant can of soup.

He says, how can an aluminum plane penetrate a steel can of soup like that? And he’s right. He’s absolutely correct. And he’s made these comments for the last 20 something years, as recently as last year. He keeps going back to that. So it’s in his head. And Q did make a post we will never forget. It was on 911 2018. And he put a picture of that light memorial that they put up every year.

The two beams go in the sky, and it says, we will never forget. We will never forgive. Hmm. Never forgive who? Not the mythical islamic terrorists. So that’s a good sign. Let’s see what happens. Yeah, actually, I’m going to look that up real quick. Should come up. If you put we will never forgive, that should suffice. Never forgive. Okay, so two. Yeah, you’re right. September 11 of 2018.

Let’s see all right, there it is. We will never forgive. I’ll make this bigger. We will never forget, and we will never forgive. Patriot Day Q and that’s from September 11 of 2018. Very interesting indeed. Nor should they never forgive. Yeah, I think they’ve all been taken care of, frankly. But we will see. We will see what comes out in the public. I include Netanyahu in that number.

I don’t think that’s him either. Well, I don’t know if some of those people, because we might slightly disagree on that, but it doesn’t really matter because at the end of the day, whether it’s them or not, we are going to see public trials. Whether these people have already been taken care of and the people that they have, the public trials, are actors or not, I don’t know.

But at the end of the day, we are going to see public trials with these people. It’s not that much of a difference or a distinction. Right. Whether we get to see the game live or whether we get to get it on video delay, as long as we get to see the game. Yeah. Who knows if we get to see public executions? I don’t know. I sure hope the hell we do, but I would pay money for that.

Absolutely, 1000% agree with you on that. We always like to leave the audience with a little bit of hope, and I do not believe that we are going to see, we’re going to have some difficult times ahead. Guys, I’m not sure if a lot of you have seen the press conference that the sheriff from Ohio did, but I’m going to be doing something on that potentially with ghost, but if not him, with somebody else, but we’re going to be talking about some of that stuff in terms of timelines, potential timelines, obviously, nobody can predict, but we are going to be having some difficult times.

But what we’re going to have on the other side, I firmly believe is going to be much better than anybody can possibly even imagine. Trump, if you listen to a lot of the things that Trump is talking about right now, he’s planting good seeds of things, of what’s going to happen. On the flip side, I believe it’s going to be very good. So what say you there, Mr.

King? Well, I just hope we get to see it all and that these characters aren’t just killed off, like due to natural causes or old age, just to spare the public. And I’m not sure I know justice will be done. I’m very confident of that. It’s not like I have a bloodlust or anything. But it’s very important, very important to teach people a lesson and just as a sense of justice to see it, because we have been their victims.

Back in the days when we did used to execute people, the family would come and witness. It wasn’t the purpose of a party. It’s that sense, the proverbial closure. So I think that’s very important that we get closure, but I think we will because there’s hints in that direction. You see the mainstream media now, they’re saying he might execute people. I’ve heard that in several areas he has.

Absolutely. Yeah. It’s very nice to hear. It’s very nice to hear. Like you, I don’t have a bloodlust either. The interesting thing is that the older I get, the less likely I am to watch war movies. I don’t really even like to watch war movies anymore because I look at what war movies are, and to me, it’s like, I’m not a fan of that anymore. No, it’s to glorify the war and prepare you for the next one.

Right. That’s always been the case down throughout the ages, throughout the millennium, people get fired up, and war is so romanticized. When the bullets start flying and your buddies are getting. Their guts are getting blown off all around you, you realize, like, this is not fun. The perfect example of that is what happened in August of 1914, when everybody was all excited to go to war. All of Europe was all, hey, patriotic.

And you see these crowds of everybody, hey, we’re going to war. We’re going to war. And shoot. It didn’t take very long. I tell you what, when you study history, it’s so frustrating because I’m in the moment when I go back and learn about all this stuff. So then when a new war breaks out and you see people acting stupid all over again, it’s like, oh, my God.

Two proverbs come to mind. One, those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them. And then there’s another one. It goes something like, we learn from history that we don’t learn from history. That is tragic. People always get fired up for war, and then when it drags on, they realize what a horror show it is. But we’ll pick up on the next few chapters next week.

Again, that’s crash course 911, inside job. You’ll find it at Amazon. It’s only $14. Get a bunch of these, because I tell you, these are good weapons, just like the other one, crash course NWL. But this is even more effective because this is like pride of mind open. Before you get to the other one. I will find the link to that and put it in the comment or in the description.

It’s not there right now, but I will find it and you can find Mike’s work@realnewsandhistory. com. And then if you do the Ron with lowercase, lowercase, lowercase r lowercase, then I’ll put the link to that in the description as well. And you get a little bit of something special. You can get the pdfs there, too. Of all the books. Some people like the pdfs. This one too. So that’s real.

Newsandhistory. com R-O-N smallr and then if you want the 911 book, that’s on Amazon. And last night I started reading the Putin book. Oh, did you? Yeah, I started down the road of the Putin book because I want to do something on the interview of Tucker, but I want to be able to go through that book first because I feel like that will arm me with more information to be able to better.

Yeah, it’s. A lot of stuff was said in that interview. Themes were visited that I wrote about in 2014. That was the first book I got on Amazon, actually. War against Putin. Just a thought. Maybe next week we take a hiatus and talk about that after I’ve done with the book. Sure. That would actually be very. I think that’d be a good exercise to take a break from this and talk about that.

Just to talk about the interview, because you were the one that wrote that book and I think you have quite a bit of insight. Just a thought we can just spitball. That’s always one of my favorite subjects as well. It’s grossly misunderstood going back even before the whole Cold War, all the lies concerning the Cold War. Yeah, that’s an amazing story. Have you ever read any of the Anthony Sutton books talking about the greatest enemy money can buy? Any of that stuff? Many years ago, I think I read Wall street and the Bolsheviks many years ago.

He talks about how more caterpillar and international trucks were built in the Soviet Union than were built in the, you know, without the US manufacturing mean, the Soviet Union, they just had limitless manpower. Yes, but they needed the stuff. And not just weaponry, of course, but even things like parts for things that break down and cans of food, everything. It was just incredible what we sent to the.

They were, they were the labor force. They were the labor force. They were building the tractors and the parts and all that stuff in. It’s. But that’s no different. Than what we were doing in World War II when we sent so many things over there. And american ingenuity and technology essentially funded the Soviet Union, really, almost from the get go. But, yeah, that’s a topic for another day.

Okay. We’ll do Putin next week. Sure. Yeah. Stick around there, Mr. King. And you guys will change a plan for tomorrow morning. Linda is not going to be available tomorrow morning, so we are going to have to push back one more week for the health podcast. So that will not be happening tomorrow morning, but I will see you tomorrow night. I’m going to be going through the next chapter of the war against Putin.

So look forward to seeing everybody tomorrow, and we’ll see you guys again next week. Mike. Take care, everybody. Good night. .

See more of Untold History Channel on their Public Channel and the MPN Untold History Channel channel.