Summary
➡ The text discusses accusations of corruption and political manipulation against the Biden family, highlighting alleged quid pro quo deals, utilization of fake names, and stonewalling investigation efforts. Criticisms are also made towards the media for failing to hold the government accountable and for perpetuating what is identified as misinformation.
➡ Revolution Radio, a platform for free speech, thanks its listeners and hosts for their support and encourages further support to maintain the fight against tyranny and oppression. The Cosmic Oracle, a radio show on the same network, offers to answer personal and cosmic questions. The station also strives to keep its community informed about the truth and differing perspectives on global events, such as the notion of directed energy weapons being used in Maui, and the theories surrounding the 9/11 attacks.
➡ The speaker questions Occam’s razor’s applicability to conspiracy theories, citing events like 9/11 and JFK’s assassination. They also discuss their electrical engineering background and the inadequacy of the teachings in college, specifically in relation to Maxwell’s equations and quaternion math. The speaker describes theories related to the destruction of the Twin Towers, involving high voltage fields created through a sequence of methods involving fission devices, voltage from the ionosphere, HARP vibrations and a transmitter from the 7th building, suggesting the use of Tesla-like methods.
➡ The speaker discusses a theory about high-frequency energy manipulation and molecular dissociation being used in the destruction of the Twin Towers. This process, attributed to advanced technology, supposedly caused matter to disassemble into its basic components and revert to a lower energy state. Additionally, they propose various unique phenomena such as toasted cars and anomalous lightning patterns that occurred during the event as supporting evidence. There is also speculation about manipulation of media narratives and government information on events like the 9/11 attack and potential underlying agendas.
➡ The text covers various conspiracy theories about historical events like JFK’s assassination, 9/11, and Sandy Hook and delves into discussions about their plausibility based on existing evidence. It also involves a theoretical conversation about the potential use of electromagnetic energy, nuclear devices, and molecular dissociation during these events.
➡ The text discusses the potential usage and effects of Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) weapons, which can create disturbances in electronics across a wide range of frequencies and are not limited to nuclear deployment. It also highlights the potential threat of an EMP weapon being used to destabilize a country’s infrastructure, such as an electrical grid. Additionally, the topic of directed energy weapons (like lasers, masers, or microwaves) potentially being used for destructive purposes like setting fire to large areas is discussed.
➡ The discussion revolves around the concepts of directed energy weapons, space and air-based weapons, nanothermite versus thermite, and potential use of mini nukes. It questions the validity of commonly accepted historical and scientific knowledge, and highlights the existence of secret technology and classified weaponry, including advanced nanothermite weapons with properties beyond current comprehension.
➡ The text covers a lengthy argument about the validity of nanothermite as a means for the demolition of the Twin Towers. The speaker stands confident that nanothermite could not have been responsible based on substantial research and published articles. Though accepting that further evidence could alter this hypothesis, he mentions that credible counter-arguments have not been presented by proponents of the nanothermite theory and urges the audience to present any contradictory evidence.
➡ Spend a quality weekend with loved ones and engage in thought-provoking debates, amidst concerns over potential political issues like a nuclear conflict with Russia. Utilize available information to revisit and understand past events like 911 while appreciating contributions from callers and commentators.
Transcript
Clintons and the Obamas. But never in memory has an entire extended presidential family been involved in selling influence for millions of dollars in quid pro quo lucra. The vast majority of such ill gotten gains, likely untaxed by being channeled through sham companies, foreign deposits, fake names and alias, email accounts. Never has a corrupt presidential family itself offered so much proof of its own guilt.
Paragraph 2:
Do the democrats have any idea of the smelly Biden albatross hanging around their collective neck? How much longer can they continue to dismiss the communications of the Hunter Pine laptop? Or the testimony of IRS whistleblowers? Or the assertions of Biden family business associates? Or the statement of relevant Ukrainian oligarchs? Or the latest assertion to Viktor Shokin? Or the extraordinary efforts of the Bidens to stonewall subpoenaed documents, use fake names and shadow email accounts, compromise federal prosecutors, appoint sham special counsels, use media toadies to a point of embarrassment to hide the ugly truth in some.
Paragraph 3:
What were the Bidens so afraid of that prompted them to corrupt the DOJ and FBI to stonewall any discussion of the huge caste infusions that came from abroad into their family coffers? Americans have impeached or nearly impeached presidents before for abuse of power, lying under oath, or supposedly using government to pursue their own personal agenda or harass their enemies. But never has a president been so clearly compromised by bribery from shady foreign government related grandees in expectation of favorable treatment.
Paragraph 4:
In other words, there is growing evidence that Jim and Hunter Biden, and likely Jim Biden as well, Joe and Hunter Biden and likely Jim Biden as well made millions of dollars in the hope that then Vice President Biden and perhaps one day a future President Biden would alter a compromise U.S. Foreign policy on the expectation of getting rich. The state department’s Ukraine team deemed Victor Shokin making progress in rooting out corruption. So why did Joe Biden, without consultation, fire him? Did Biden put his own financial interest above the countries in a fashion the founding fathers worried was impeachable treason? If the current investigation are not halted or compromised, we may soon learn why the constitution explicitly specified bribery and treason as ironclad causes for impeachment.
Paragraph 5:
Can Americans even comprehend that they’ve elected a dishonest man to the presidency who’s protected by his own senility, his decades long every man construction of old Joe Biden from Scranton, his usefulness as a prop to the radical left wing agenda, and the defensive and offensive weaponization of the criminal justice system, can Americans digest? And instead of campaigning against Donald Trump, out debating him, outspending him, and out foxing him. The government must unleash kindred prosecutors that destroy by blowing up the entire tradition of blind American jurisprudence.
Paragraph 6:
Are the median left claiming that to save the rule of law from Trump, they must first destroy it. Mitchell. I think David Hansen. Victor Hansen got it exactly right. I think this is a wonderful piece. I want to invite first your and then Alan’s comments. Mitchell, your thoughts?
Paragraph 7:
Well, Jim, we live in a time, it’s often said, a universal deceit, particularly coming from government. But it’s not an accident. It’s a calculated plan, and it’s a step by step brainwashing of all humanity. If we could get Obama, Biden and the rest of his know, they should be indicted for what they did to mean there is no know. It’s still the continuing pattern that all of the crimes that have been committed by Democrats against Trump and the United States are now being foisted at Trump in kind of this bastardization of justice. It truly is political perversion of it all. Yeah, it’s just unbelievable to the degree of corruption involved.
Paragraph 8:
Alan, Alan, I’d like to invite you to offer your thoughts about this state of affairs sorted unbelievably lawless. United States is not just a banana republic. It’s far below that. It’s a criminal enterprise. Your thoughts?
Paragraph 9:
Alan well, my thoughts are know, you got to think about, well, who are the bad guys and why are they bad and why are they doing this? And got to realize that it’s really a battle against spiritual things in high places. And I think a lot of people are corrupted, coerced, blackmailed. They get into things. I believe in the living God who can make it rain and made the earth and people who can we can do things in the material world, but I think there’s a whole supernatural world and these demonic entities, they can’t really do things in the physical, but they can plant information. They can corrupt people’s thoughts, just like Garden of Eden.
Paragraph 10:
So I think that that’s really and the satanic force has been around for many years and we don’t have a chance. And I think a lot of these people who do such bad things are kind of victims of Satanic influences and they can all be redeemed, but most of them probably won’t. Yes, well, one of the ironies, of course, is that the more they indict, the greater the support has especially been illustrated in Georgia where the black community is overwhelmingly supporting Trump now because they see him as subjected to the same kinds of abuse of the law to which they themselves have historically been.
Paragraph 11:
You know, when they try to make out by bringing Rico charges against Trump that he is actually the dawn of a crime family, when the evidence is so abundant and compelling that it’s Biden who’s ahead of a crime family, you just see the PR stunt. This is just a propaganda ploy, a psyop to make it look like Trump is the one who’s running the crime family when it’s overwhelmingly obvious it’s Biden. In my lifetime of 82 years, I’ve never seen anything remotely comparable to this. And of course, the media has completely abdicated its responsibility to hold the government accountable in a fashion never before seen.
Paragraph 12:
And I do believe it has a whole lot to do with Israel having our control of our Congress and control of our media so that none of this is really intended to publish a truth. I mean, just look at how many cases. Financial violations, hillary Clinton encouraging mass unrest, kamala Harris illegal moving and possessing classified docs biden. The financial irregularities in Frost. Sharpton claimed Trump was sabotaging the duty of state electors. Whole lot of Hollywood actors in 2016. I mean, it just goes on and on. The monsters who are in control are not prosecuting those who are actually committing the real offenses, but rather using fabricated charges against Trump to achieve their own political agenda, which they manifestly cannot do if this were on the up and up.
Paragraph 13:
Mitchell, further thoughts? Well, Jen, I have been terming it. The only way I can describe it is full spectrum dominance. Okay? There was once this intelligence program where they really wanted to know everything everywhere, all the time, and, well, they have it now. They can literally propagandize and affect in real time, but not just get the information out, but they can censor information in real time. So not only that can they have gotten to where they propagandize at will on queue, anytime. They will also censor anything, anytime, anywhere, to achieve their yes, yes.
Paragraph 14:
Alan, any further thoughts of yours? I’m just so sick of it, but it’s frightening. I’m kind of concerned about what we’re going to talk about for the rest of the hour here. I don’t want to get snuffed, so it’s kind of scary to not be able to tell the truth in this world without facing repercussions. Of course, the truth about JFK 911, even the moon landing. I mean, the government has perpetrated so many frauds on the American people. It’s truly disgusting and outrageous. And the media, sad to say, has been complicit in perpetrating these frauds. If Trump had done no more than to call out the fake news media, in my opinion, he would have deserved the admiration and respect of every American.
Paragraph 15:
Because we’ve reached a point where too many were simply taking for. Granted, they were playing the role of Gullible SAPS in relation to what they were hearing from the government when it was remote from truth. It was pure propaganda. And as I endlessly explained, that has something to do with the fact that 100 execs of CNN are dual US citizens. 100 execs from NBC are dual US Israeli citizens. 100 execs from the New York Times are dual US Israeli citizens. Remember, the New York Times is the nation’s newspaper of record. What appears in The New York Times is supposed to be get this the official history of the United States. That’s what it means to be the nation’s newspaper of record, and they’re doing a miserable job of it. I had friends, for example, a woman to whom I was actually even engaged when I was an assistant professor at Kentucky, lived and breathed The New York Times. She had a habit. First thing in the morning, last thing at night, she read every word and she believed it. Today, anyone who held that stance would be viewed as having lost it, having no conception of what really is going on out there in the world, because almost 90% of what they publish is fake news. We’ll be right back after this message.I’d like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship. Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free. We need the support of the people. It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression. Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth. With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolutionradiofreedomslips.com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet. Revolution radio. Radio. Radio. Radio.
Hey, everyone, it’s Barbara. Jean Lindsay, the cosmic oracle. If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolutionradio@freedomslips.com on Saint Revolution Radio. Every Wednesday, 08:00 P.M. Eastern time on Studio B for momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia@freedomships.com, the People Station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them. They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolutionradio and Freedomslips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You’re listening to Revolutionradio Freedomslips.com 100% listener supported radio. And now we return you to your host.
Well, as of course, regular listeners are well aware, it appears directed energy weapons were used in Maui, whether they were lasers, masers, microwaves, maybe still open for discussion, but that this was not a naturally occurring wildfire provable on multiple grounds. The official narrative was that Hawaiian electric had left their power on and that high winds had caused some of them to fall, their electric towers, causing the fires to ignite. But it turns out that Hawaiian electric shut off the power 6 hours before there was no juice in the lines. So that’s not a possible explanation. We also know from isolated cars, not to mention the boats out in the water that were destroyed, parts of which melted, such as aluminum wheels and their glass windshields, that since wildfires don’t burn at temperatures above 400 degrees Fahrenheit, but aluminum would not melt below 1300 and the windshields closer to 4000 were being played. I mean, these are laws of nature that cannot be violated and cannot be changed.
Now, in New York, I invited Steve Jones to be my co-chair when I founded Scholars for 911 Truth. Steve, even though, and this is significant, he has a background in nuclear energy advocated the nanothermite theory whereby June of 2006 I was convinced thermite couldn’t cut it, meaning that literally and figuratively. I would subsequently publish three articles with a chemical engineer, T. Mark Hightower in 2011, demonstrating the impossibility of nanothermite having blown apart the towers, including the fact that for cement to be destroyed, an explosive must have a detonation velocity of 3200 meters/second for steel to be pulverized. 6100 meters/second? And at the highest, attributed detonation velocity for nanothermite in the scientific literature is only 895 meters/second, meaning you can’t get there from there. To compound the absurdity, Neil Sarrett, who is a retired associate professor of chemistry at University of Copenhagen, estimate how much nanothermide it would take to destroy twin towers up with a figure 26,000 metric tons. 26,000 metric tons. I mean, that’s just staggering and reflects the fact that nanothermide is a feeble explosive. Feeble only has one 13th explosive power at TNT.
Therefore, toward the end of 2006, I began an interviewing Judy Wood and what would turn out to be 15 interviews where I was pioneering interaction between radio and the Internet, because in each of those 15 shows, we go to Judy’s website, have our listeners go to Judy’s website and talk about contents, videos, photographs. She has a stupendous accumulation. During the Vancouver hearings, which I organized in 2012, however, I discovered a vast amount of evidence that it had actually been done using nuclear devices, mini nukes in the sub basement. And because it appears that all of the phenomena, all the data points, are explicable by the mini nuke hypothesis, but some are not. By the directed energy hypothesis, I have advocated the mini nuke. But looking at what happened in Lahena. I’m now more open to the possibility that directed energy weapons were also used in New York on 911, even if it wasn’t a pilot project, as a supplement. And I’m delighted to say that in conversation I’ve had with Alan, he’s gravitated in the same direction. He has very sophisticated insights about how all of this was done, and I’m therefore ecstatic to have him here with me today. Alan, take the floor.
Okay. Well, first let me give you just a little background. I don’t want to say too much because I don’t want to say too much, but I spent 30 years in the intelligence military community working on advanced weapons technologies and programs. I’ve got a degree in electrical engineering with a focus on electromagnetic fields and waves. So I think about waves going around me all the time and what are the frequencies doing? Stuff like that. Okay, so let’s talk primarily about 911 here. I believe that the primary target on 911 was the Pentagon, in that the twin Towers were kind of let’s get two birds with 1 st because they needed to come down anyway and maybe to refocus attention. But on the Pentagon, I really think that was the primary target. I think it was because they had just finished a hardened skiff with all the financial records for all the black world things that go on. And in the intelligence community, the DoD people tend to be more honest or upfront than the things that go on in CIA and NSA and places like that. Even though we have secrets, I think DoD seems to be more of an honest broker, primarily because the people get rotated. They don’t sit in one place long enough to be corrupted and coerced and become part of the guru boy network because they go to different jobs and things. Some of the worst people, I believe, or the big element of this deep state is the senior executive service, the Ses. Civilians are just not to be trusted. From my so I think that the primary target was taking out that database, those computers in the Pentagon that held all the black world financial information, and I think it was Donald Rumsfeld, is that right? Who announced the day before 911 that what we were missing, like $2.2 trillion. Like that 3 trillion, yeah. So sometimes this is one of my favorite analogies. We kind of know about million, billion, trillion. We know one’s bigger than the other, but just an object lesson here. We can wrap our heads around a million dollar house, things like that. So if I borrow $100 from you and say, I will pay you back in a million seconds, you’ll get your money back in about twelve days. If I say I’ll pay you back in a billion seconds, you’re going to get your money back in 32 years. If I tell you I’ll pay you back in a trillion seconds, you’re going to get your money back in 32,000 years. Can you imagine that? That’s 32,000 years of seconds is how much a trillion dollars is. It’s a lot. Anyway, so I think that really was the primary target, and there are some things that would indicate I mean, it doesn’t seem like it was a plane for sure. We saw stuff on the grounds afterward that weren’t there during the early footage of what happened, because I’m focused on electromagnetic fields and waves. There were some reports that and I think there are some clocks that stopped, electrically powered clocks that stopped just shortly before the missile hit the Pentagon, and there were reports that they heard there were, like, small explosions that went off in that vault right before the drone hood or whatever it was. Anyway, it would appear to me that somebody did put small EMP devices, explosively driven to make sure that all the hard drives and equipment was definitely wiped out. So I think that really was the primary thing that happened there.
What, Shanksville? The plane that crashed Pennsylvania, they never excavated that and got all the way out. I mean, if somebody dies in the landslide or miners, we always dig down and get them out. I mean, that’s highly unlike the United States to not totally have excavated where that plane went down. So I don’t think that was real. I don’t think there was anybody on that plane.
Now let’s talk about the Twin Towers. Judy Wood did a great thing at capturing information. She gets some unhappiness expressed because she doesn’t call out a mechanism or how she thinks it was done, but she reports on what was done. I think that’s very respectable of her to not propose a hypothesis. Actually, it’s kind of like there’s an analogy of a clock. You can imagine. You’ve seen the
(Note: The text continues, but this is where the last paragraph ends.)Works of a grandfather clock. I see one. It seems like it’s probably got the same gears and things that maybe we’ve seen before. But you don’t know if the clockworks are locked up and you can’t see might be battery powered, could be nuclear powered. You never know. You can design things that look like other things. So I think it’s good of her, even though she collected all this information, to not propose a theory that could be wrong. But her book is great, and the things in there are great. So without further ado, let me tell you what I think happened on 911.
There’s a thing. What is it? Occam is a razor. I don’t know if I’m saying that right. That indicates if you got different options to consider, you should always take the simplest one. I think in all of this conspiracy theory stuff, that should be just totally disregarded. That’s a bad idea. In the JFK assassination, it’s way easier to believe that Lee Harvey Oswald just did it and they had all this stuff against him. Even with the weird bullet trajectory thing, it’s way easier to believe that than what really know gulf of know. It’s easier to believe that they opened fire on us versus what really happened. Sandy Hook. It’s easier to think that some kind of troubled young guy did this thing instead of what really happened, which is kind of big and ugly.
So I’ve had some people say, hey, as long as we got evidence that there were nuclear devices involved in the Twin Towers, you need to look no further, because that explains it all. I don’t think that does explain it all. So I’m throwing out Occam’s razor on this one. The other thing. That I want to put in here from introduction know, tesla came up with things that were totally different than different way of thinking about electromagnetic fields and waves and electricity and stuff. And so in the Tesla things that he did, they often know high voltage, lots of available electrons and some kind of oscillation vibration kind of thing. So those are three keys high voltage, enough electrons to use that voltage and manipulating the frequencies.
There’s a guy who passed away not too long ago that I was associated with, a guy named Tom Bearden that I would think people would really like to hear about. He thought of all of this stuff in a different way also very much like Tesla. He got in trouble a little bit in afraid for his life, because a lot of the things, a lot of the technology that we’re talking about leads to free energy and antigravity and other things some forces don’t want us to talk about. But I told you I had a degree in electrical engineering with mostly electromagnetic fields and waves and such like that. I will tell you that in college, we were pretty much lied to about the math, and we were lied to about electricity, basic stuff. Maxwell’s equations are the things that we base all of our electromagnetic fields and waves and all of that kind of stuff on. Well, Maxwell’s equations were really originally written in quaternion math, and quaternion math is kind of hard, kind of different. And Maxwell’s equations were dumbed down by a guy named Heavyside so we could use it in the way we think of the way we do our math for electricity and stuff. Well quaternion math, it turns out, and I could get in trouble with this, but the Star Wars program, we’re spending billions of dollars on it, and then suddenly it just kind of disappeared. It didn’t disappear share we’re still spending trillions of dollars. But one of the things that goes on in the solution they found is quaternion math is a big part of that. Quaternion math is a little different. The only other place they use it that I know of is in the advanced gaming systems.
Well even like some of the auto driving kinds of things. What’s different about queturian math is like if you start at a scene like you’re going to drive a car down a road, you can run that car right into a fire hydrant, and things will explode and burning and stuff like that. You can do the same thing, exactly the same, and the flames will be different. The explosion will be different. You can be at a level where you’re trying to get through a door and you know there’s a guy to the right because you’ve been there before that you got to shoot. You can shoot him the very same way, and the blood will be different. It’s not any canned video at all. It learns, it develops, itself and the way just electricity goes through a flashlight with the voltage and the electrons and the resistance and stuff like that, it’s a quite useful way to make things work, but it’s not how it really works.
And so in the scuterian math, I don’t want to belabor it too much, but we use this thing, pi in normal fields and waves, a lot of pi, two pi, r, that kind of thing. And pi is what, some irrational number that keeps going on forever? Well, in quaternion math, pi is like one. In quaternion math, there are no imaginary numbers. So it’s very interesting, the things that we’ve been told that aren’t really true. So here I go. Am I belaboring this too much? Jim, you’re ready to go on Twin Towers? You’re doing fine, Alan. Just go ahead and lay it out. I mean, I differ on a couple of points, but that’s insignificant. I want you to just lay out your expertise, especially in relation to how the Twin Towers appear to have been destroyed.
Okay, well, first of all, I believe that what was created was we kind of made them a big lightning rod, and I believe that mini nukes were definitely part of making them into a big lightning rod. I think there was small fission devices in the basement, but I’m not sure that they were designed to cause damage necessary or the damage we saw. When you have a fission reaction, one of the main things you get is a bunch of caesium isotopes. And different caesium isotopes decay at different rates, nanoseconds to thousands of years. In the intelligence community, if they want to find out if a country set off a nuclear device, they look for caesium 131 because it has a half life of about ten days, and then you can tell, did this reaction happen soon? You got to get to it fast, but you can kind of link something that might have been an earthquake to maybe an underground nuclear test by detecting the caesium 131.
Well, the thing about caesium, which is one of the main products from a fission reaction, is it’s one of the most electronegative substances there are, most electromagnetic elements there are. So what that effectively does, if you create that caesium, it acts like a lightning rod. It pulls down the energy, the voltage, essentially, from the ionosphere. And we’ve got millions of volts constantly from the ionosphere between the ionosphere and the Earth. And when the insulation breaks down, we get lightning kind of thing. That’s why we get thunderstorms, stuff like that. All the electron volts interact with the Earth because of the voltage difference. So that’s there all the time. So I believe the first step was they set off these small nuclear devices to make those towers into a channel with the ionosphere. That is almost think of it as controlled lightning. Not enough to really cause lightning, but the voltage all wanting to come down.
And then I believe what they did was they used harp. I’m not going to go into what harp is to vibrate the ionosphere to create wavefronts vibrations in that channel, electromagnetic wavefronts in that channel. Okay, so you’ve got the controlled lightning voltage thing. Now you’ve got like Tesla was all about. You’ve got the vibration coming down that channel. And then I believe the key part of it was building seven.
I think they had another transmitter in building seven. There were some reports that large amounts of coolant and things might have been delivered to that building before 911. I think they had another transmitter in building seven, and it was aimed at an angle to the column of energy that was available from the nuclear devices. And they used interferometry. If you’re familiar with interferometry and you can look it up, it’s how you can use certain frequencies coming at different angles to see things that’s smaller than the wavelength of those frequencies or to create frequencies. An example kind of in the real world is if you’ve got two ski boats out on a lake, you see their waves, but when those waves hit, you get all kinds of weird things. You can make things in water that look like squares if you just create the wave patterns right in the water. So by doing that from two different angles, you didn’t have to have all the energy in building the building seven transmitter, but you could create the interference patterns that you wanted at different frequencies. So if you think of a laser, the early ruby lasers, what do they do? They shined
(blank line)Light at a certain frequency, certain frequency that would excite the outer level electron. Then when that light stops, the electron falls back to a lower energy state and gives off energy in a specific wavelength. Okay. I believe they manipulated with harp coming down the channel and providing the high voltage and the manipulation of the frequencies and waves. And they probably scanned through and did things for different purposes. From building seven, they created essentially energy that and this was what I believe is the key mechanism, and this was mentioned in one of your first things, is molecular dissociation.
If you add energy at just the right frequencies, you don’t have to have a lot of heat. You can break the molecules apart. And you should look up, you can Google it. It’s one of the hottest things going forward, is this thing of molecular dissociation. You add energy through frequencies and things, and you actually break apart the molecules into component neutrons, protons, electrons, those kinds of things. So when you let that go back, when you take the energy away, it goes back to the lowest, easiest state. It’s kind of like if you think about steel or aluminum. We’ve had to add energy and processes to purify those things and give those things order, and even trees or plants, something takes place that gives that material order. When it goes back to its raw elements, it’ll automatically go back to a lower state. Like things want to come to lead, things want to rust, things come back.
So I think that is what happened is they essentially added energy from the ionosphere to the molecules to dissociate them. And when it was done, everything turned into dust, turned into a lower energy unorganized state. Another thing to think about with that is there was a pop up hurricane that blew up kind of an area and went away. What would have happened there is hurricanes cause ice crystals in the upper atmosphere. Ice crystals in the upper atmosphere create static electricity, which is just really free electrons. So that gave them the extra electrons they needed. You had the voltage already from the ionosphere between the atmosphere and the Earth with the twin towers acting like a lightning rod in this controlled thing. Now they added through weather manipulation. Hold that thought right back. We’ll be right back after this message.
Was it a conspiracy? Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting? This is a drill. This is a drill on bullhorns during the marathon that the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities. And that one would be set off in 1 minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced. Peering through the smoke you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood. The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube. They used amputee actors and a studio quality smoke machine. Don’t let yourself be played. Check out. And nobody died in Boston either. Available@moonrockbooks.com that’s moonrockbooks.com. If you think for 1 second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourselves. Because we know who they are and what they do. This is what they do. And we must fight back. It you can torture us and bomb us. Fire is catching. And if we burn, you burn with us. Pretty. Are you awake yet? I hope. We’ve tried and we’ve tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change. That time is over. Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites. The war is coming and it’s your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim. Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolutionradiofreedomslips.com the number one listener supported radio station on the planet. Not giving up. Revolution. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda. Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half truths. And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised. Join Dr. OT every Friday night on Studio B at 10:00 p.m.. Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing Unparalleled Broadcasting Excellence in 1997. That is, if you really care about learning the truth. The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them. They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolutionradio and Freedomslips.com, its staff or affiliates. You’re listening to Revolutionradio Freedomslips.com 100% listeners supported radio. And now we return you to your host, my featured guest today, Alan, is giving us a rather thoroughgoing explanation of how he believes twin towers were destroyed. Alan, please do continue.
Excellent. Okay, well, I think I left off talking about the pop up hurricane that would have created the extra free electrons to do this. Another thing that is in Judy Woods’ book, where did the towers go? Is towards the back. She talks about magnetic sensors that are around the world that detect lightning. We have lightning strikes. It affects the magnetic fields in the earth, things like that, so they can see lightning strikes around the world. Apparently there were the same kind of thing that looked like lightning ongoing at the very time and place that the twin towers were brought down. So I think that adds some credence to the idea that this was kind of like controlled lightning with a little stuff put on. The other thing I also am very interested in what we call the toasted cars around that area.
The if you if you look at what happens with a microwave oven, you know, there’s some things you don’t want to put in a microwave oven because weird stuff happens if you put metal in a microwave oven. But the frequencies of a microwave affect water. You got to have something wet. If it’s dry, the cup doesn’t get hot, but the water does for your coffee. But it affects oil even more than at those frequency, even more than water. So there were things with the toasted cars where engines were blown out, but the other thing was the door handles were blown out, and I think I know why that happened. Why would the door handles blow out? Well, I think the engines and transmissions were blown out because some of the frequencies generated by the whole deal were in those resonant frequencies, like a microwave, and the oil and gas and stuff was affected by it. But the door handles are interesting because the door handles, if you remember, we used to make things, toys and stuff all out of white metal. Car door handles are made out of special kind of white metal so that in the winter time, when you get static electricity shocks, you don’t get a shock from your door handle. So it’s kind of a substance that conducts electricity, but not very well. Maybe kind of like an insulator kind of thing. So I think that the frequencies they used, like putting something you shouldn’t in a microwave, interacted with those door handles and blew them out. And I don’t see any other explanation for why that would have been the case with the cars. So that’s what I got for you on 9/11. That’s my theory, yeah, about the Pentagon.
I certainly agree that they had to attack the Pentagon in order to have a justification for war. I mean, if it had just been an attack on the World Trade Center, for example, then there would not have been a military demand. So they had to fabricate the attack on the Pentagon. And based upon my research, yes, it was a missile fired by an unmanned aerial vehicle. It appears to have been a global hawk. We even had Jamie McIntyre, who is best reporter for CNN on the scene, explain to the anchor, Judy Woodbrough, I think that when she spoke of a plane having hit the Pentagon, he replied that you might think that, but from his close up inspection, there was no sign of any plane having hit anywhere near the Pentagon. He’s got that absolutely right. He did fly a plane toward the building that then swooped over it. I even have a friend with trucker Buddy who witnessed it and told him how he watched his plane approach a Pentagon and then fly over it at the same time explosives were set off in the front of the building. There’s so much going on here, Alan, with regard to Occam, what’s essential to understand regarding the principle is that you should prefer the simplest or the most economical or the most elegant explanation, provided that it can account for all the data. So you’re right. Naively thinking about say, Sandy Hook or 9/11 or JFK on its face, it’s simpler to suppose, yeah, one guy shot Jack from the 6th floor of the Book Depository, or 19 Islamic terrorists attacked the world on 9/11, or a kid shot up and killed 20 children.
[Blank line]not availableOf thing. So the perfect impulse is what we call a dirac function that has, like, infinite magnitude and no time. It just goes blip. So impulse things, spark plugs in your car, things like that, you can create impulses in lots of different ways, not just nuclear weapons, okay?So we have devices as big as a briefcase that would take out all the electronics in a building as big as the Capitol building, maybe something like that, that are explosively driven. Doesn’t have to be nuclear. Okay? And technology is a lot like rail guns. You dump a lot of energy and you get a very discount, very impulsive thing, causes a CMP.
So the reason you want to do that is because you might not know what your target is susceptible to. Like one frequency might screw up a computer monitor. A different frequency might screw up a phone. And so if you know what frequency messes something up, you’re better off just using your energy in that frequency. In Afghanistan, we knew what frequencies the artillery was susceptible to and could point like a jammer that was tuned and they would blow up prematurely in flight kind of thing.
Okay, so in college, electromagnetics in college, they would tell you that it’s all about energy, spectral density. It’s how much energy, but not the total energy. It’s how wide is your antenna and how broad is the frequency. So if you’re what turns out microwave ovens and your 2.4 GHz WiFi kind of use the same frequency, but it’s all about energy, spectral density. The microwave oven is giving you a lot more energy in that frequency. The WiFi is spreading it out and stuff like that. That’s kind of scary though. They use the same frequencies.
So anyway, ideally you’d put your energy to screw something up in a narrow band, but you don’t know what it is. EMP creates energy across the band, so it can sneak in a crack or a sensor or get to it one way or the other because it’s creating all the frequencies from low to high. So EMP doesn’t have to be from a satellite in space. In fact, there is no EMP in space. It turns out if we have an EMP weapon, it’s essentially the nuclear detonation breaks the it uses what we call bremstrolung radiation. It’s a German word that means breaking radiation. It’s when electrons move real fast.
So what happens is a nuclear device with nitrogen around breaks the electrons loose from the atom and then they join real fast. And so you get this real fast impulse from the electrons being broke loose from the atoms and coming back rejoining. So that really happens best where you’ve got a lot of nitrogen, which is at low altitudes. As you go up in the atmosphere, you get less nitrogen concentration. So an EMP weapon, nuclear driven EMP weapon, actually would work best at ground level.
But then you lose your field of view, you don’t see very far. So if you go higher, then you can see a long ways or it can manifest itself in a larger area. So there’s a trade off, but you don’t want to be up, but space doesn’t do it. You got to be around nitrogen to make the nuclear EMP really happen.
So I am thinking there’s a good possibility that this thing with the Chinese balloons that were allowed to fly overhead, it may have been a Brinksmanship thing where the Chinese were saying we’ve. Got an EMP on this. We’re going to come map this out and if you try to stop us, we’re going to set off EMP and cause this catastrophic damage on different treaties we’ve had in the past. Start treaty, salt tree, those kind of things. We were allowed to put inspectors and we traded inspectors and let people inspect stuff.
So it might have been a brinksmanship thing where those balloons were probably at the optimal altitude to create an EMP effect as far as the range and the range and the nitrogen being around there. And of course, an EMP over America would take out our electrical grid and bring America to a I mean, it seems to me that’s one of the simplest way our enemies could take us out, an EMP device on a balloon would really screw us up bad.
Yep. Listen, we’re hitting the break here. We’re going to take your calls after calling to talk with Alan and Mia Mitchell too about any of these subjects. We’ll be right back after this message management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made revolution radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever growing dark world of censorship. Unfortunately, this platform’s, free speech has never been free. We need the support of the people. It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression. Please help support revolution radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going death to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world. Revolutionradio freedomslips.com. The number one listener supporter radio station on the planet. Revolution radio. You lain revolution radio.
Every Wednesday, 08:00 p.m. Eastern time on studio B for momentary zen with host Zen Garcia@freedomstrich.com, the people stationary.
Even the government admits that 911 was a conspiracy. But did you know that it was an inside job? That Osama had nothing to do with it? That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micronukes? That building seven collapsed 7 hours later because of explosives planted in the building? Barry Jennings was there. He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The US geological survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event. Ironically, that means the government’s own evidence contradicts the government’s official position. 911 was brought to us.
Complements of the CIA, the neocons of the department of defense and the Mossad. Don’t let yourself be played. Read America nuked on 911 available@moonrockbooks.com that’s moonrockbooks.com the opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs and its website by the hosts, guests and call in listeners or chatters are solely of the opinions of the original source who expressed them. They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolutionradio and Freedomslips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You’re listening to Revolutionradio Freedomslips.com, 100% listeners supported radio. And now we return you to your host.
Well, everyone, you’re welcome to call 540-352-4452 Mitchell staying by to bring you on with Alan and me. We’re welcome to talk about any of the subjects and of course, that introduction, that early piece by David Victor Hansen is just fantastic in its breadth and scope and it’s available to you now on my blog@jameshfetser.org, as well as another by Edward Hendry about kind of fire. This isn’t going to go away. Believe it or not, they put up a huge curtain. I mean, it kind of resembles a border wall to block seeing the evidence, but it’s already out there. There’s always so much evidence out there. In fact, Alan, let me invite your consideration of what the hell happened in this.
I am personally convinced Maui and paradise were both classic examples of directed energy weapons. And with your expertise, perhaps you could elaborate on the difference that would have occurred had it been lasers versus masers versus microwaves. Your thoughts?
Well, I’ve been kind of interested for a couple of years now on why we never heard about mazers. We ought to be hearing more about masers lasers. It’s all about the coherence of the electromagnetic radiation. And that’s why laser light is not just about the frequency, the color, the red or the green or the blue or what color you make the laser invisible. It’s about the coherent wavefront, lets it stay in a beam. So a mazer is really like a laser at a different frequency and the beam is going to be bigger and stuff. But a lot depends with the frequency you use in a device like that as to what it interacts with.
And so, you know, when you see a blue car, that blue car is absorbing all of the light frequencies except the blue it’s reflecting. We make some communications, covert communications devices that are right in what we call the moisture absorption band. Because if we have a communications beam going, we don’t want it to go further than we want it to go, so somebody can’t pick up our communication past it.
So you actually will build a device that is absorbed more by the water in the atmosphere and those things can change. I think there’s a good chance that these things were mazers and tuned to the frequencies that would heat up plants and stuff like that, which would essentially be just like a microwave oven, but in a beam form. And we have nuclear power devices that are like the size of a suitcase, not that heavy.
So I think it’s totally possible that you can have a spaceBased on the text provided, here is the reformatted version:
Based, satellite-based maser system that would penetrate the stuff and you could tune it to the different frequencies you wanted. So that would be my guess, is what this is. I think it’s different than Dew. There’s lots of different kinds of directed energy weapons. Yes.
Besides what we’ve talked about, I think a space-based or airborne MESR is a real good suspicion. We got a caller from the five seven five area code. Caller, please give us your first name and your state and join the conversation.
Greg from New Mexico. I just heard that last excuse me, go ahead. I just heard that last little bit about space. I’ve heard a number of people speak to the implausibility of any sort of space-based weapon making it through the atmosphere. But the point I wanted to mention and something that I’ve wanted to say many times because I’ve heard you talking about thermite more times than not.
You say thermite rather than nanothermite. And then I heard just this morning you said that it’s one 13th the power of TNT or something like that. That is ridiculous. The main thing is you do not know what the properties of nano thermite are. There are a number of classified weapons that the United States military has made. Nano, thermite weapons, it’s all highly secret. There’s a good deal of variability as far as the properties of these weapons. And you have no idea about the properties of these weapons. When you say that nanothermite couldn’t have done this, couldn’t have done that, they are absolutely wrong.
I have been of the opinion that go ahead. I have been of the opinion that nanothermite, because I’ve been on top of this since day one, nanothermite pretty much accounted, as far as I’m concerned, for what we saw happen, except for the cars outside, I don’t know what the word for it is not burned, but that was some kind of microwave. So I’m open to the idea. And then there’s the bowl, I think they call it what do they call it in the basement, the big bowl. I’ve seen photos of that, and that I can believe. Maybe there was a mini nuke that was exploded because what happened to that bathtub? But everything else.
So I think it’s beyond any of us who don’t have any inside knowledge to really put the pieces together, because I think that there’s a number of pieces, but the idea that nanothermite is the way you describe it, that is absolutely wrong. Well, have you read the three articles that I published in 2011 with T. Mark Hightower as a chemical engineer? No.
Well, maybe oughta, because I think it would inform you that it is not I who am mistaken about this point. And if I’ve sometimes well, maybe you got it from someone else when it was nanothermite. That’s okay. Yeah, I’m talking about but there’s no comparison. There’s no comparison between thermite and nanothermite. No comparison at all. They’re so totally different. Don’t get your pants in a bunch. I meant nanothermite, not just thermite we know thermite is used to disable artillery weapons to fuse railroad cars together, gets up around 4000 degrees.
That’s ordinary thermite. That’s just ordinary. Listen to me, this guy Mark Hightower and I did a rather thorough search of the scientific literature. And yeah, you can always appeal to unspecified, unknown sources. It’s like those who say we actually did go to the moon, but we went to the moon using a secret technology. Well, how the hell are we supposed to be able to can I interject? The fact is that it was impossible to go to the moon. We didn’t have the propulsion power, the computing power, or the ability to withstand the Van Allen radiation belt.
But the fact is, and I’ll invite Alan to address this, you ought to take a look. I think the articles well, I don’t think you’re listening to me. Is 911 truth based upon a false theory. Is one of the three articles we published, is 911 Truth based upon a False Theory? Go ahead.
I think your caller is right, Jim. Go ahead, Alan. I think there’s a lot of stuff that we just don’t know. Lots and lots of know. In the stuff I worked in, they would always tell us, I’d get these very high-level clearances and sign your life away if you ever told, and all those kind of things. And I was always told the really secret stuff is called company confidential. It’s not even in the government. I think that there’s a chance that maybe multiple mechanisms or backup mechanisms were used on 911. And I don’t know, like I said, I don’t know enough about the effects of mini nukes and I don’t know that much about what might be done with nanothermite, so I’d be inclined to withhold judgment at this point. And let’s hear more. 575.
Stick around. Paul, come on in, join the conversation. Yeah, fascinating show. I really enjoyed it. For the most part, every now and then you do really good shows with interesting guests here. It just kind of made me think about, I mean, this is what exactly I was going to say is, okay, how do we know what we know and how do we know what we don’t know? I mean, it just reminds me of the combination of like Tesla, Flash Gordon and The Outer Limits sometimes. I really want to know. I think we all mean, I really would just love to know what the heck they’re doing.
We bump into people throughout our lives as we go about our daily travels. And I still remember some people just make an impression upon you and there’s a lot of people are full of crap and other people, you know, are probably telling the truth. And I remember this guy, I think it was probably in the late 70s or early 80s. And I met this guy and he was telling me, and I have no reason to doubt him because I think he was working for some defense contractor, I forget which one. And he said that back in the early 70s they were disintegrating objects the size of glass ashtrays with these devices, these laser-directed energy weapons. This is supposedly, according to him, they were able to disassociate disintegrate whatever small objects back in the…
I’ll remind people, if you don’t know the work of T. Townsend Brown, a British physicist, he was levitating around tethered around the pole, sandwiched metal alloys using electric current. Back then the science was known as electrogravitics and all the way up to the early to mid-50s it was kind of mainstream. I believe General Electric and General Dynamics were involved in the research with electrogravitics. And then all of a sudden it just all went dark. It all disappeared. So who knows what the heck they have. But it’s like I said, interesting discussion. Especially early on. They talk about Maxwell’s Equations and a different sort of just also quickly.
I’ll be done after this. It reminds me of my conversations with a friend of mine who has a degree in physics. He’s got a master’s degree in physics. We’ve talked many times and he told me he’s convinced now, based upon his own research, what he’s been interested in over the years, that a lot of what he was taught is not true. A lot of what he learned is just not yeah. Yeah. Paul, that’s very you know, my input on know, I gotta tell you, the thing that bothers me the most in this world is how history has been changed. We’re taught this stuff, and it just bothers me so much that we really don’t how do you know how do you even know what history that’s the that’s the perfect Alan is know we know that history is well, as Napoleon said is a set of lies agreed upon. But so if history can be lied about, why wouldn’t they lie to us about science? Exactly.
I want to invite the 575 caller to send me some links to what you got about nanothermide that you think Mark Hightower and I should consider and I’ll be glad to reach out to Mark and we’ll take a look at whatever you got. It just comes from following over the years and I can tell you the problem with what you said about the moon landing versus what I’m saying is there have been multiple reports about people who have said that nanothermidic weapons have been developed. They’re highly classified. There is an astounding variety in terms of the different kinds of properties they have. I don’t have any links or references to this but I have read this multiple times over the years. It’s very hush-hush. You’re not going to get them to say anything more than that but that much I have heard and believe.
And so when you said something about how many thousands of pounds of TNT or something or like 13% that has nothing to do with these nanothermite advanced weapons. These things are beyond your current comprehension in terms of their capabilities. I am quite sure of that. And I would point out the fact that the molten steel dripping from the tower was most likely because a thermitic charge, aNanothermite charge went off prematurely out of sequence or something that you can’t explain that with nukes. I don’t believe that was a do either. I think that was nanothermite.
Well, look, I’m delighted to hear you have this sincere belief. And if I have differing sincere beliefs, let’s see if we can arbitrate based on some evidence you’re telling me you’ve heard this, you’ve heard that? That’s not evidence. That’s not proof.
No, I understand, and I don’t have a reference to give you, but can I say something here? I can tell you definitively that what you said about nanothermide being a weak explosive, being one 13th, that is so absolutely wrong. That is easily confirmable. That is just flat out bunk.
Well, I think you’re mistaken about this, but I’m saying Mark High taranite published three articles in 2011. You can get a summary overview if you go to my blog, Jameshfetser.org, and look at on C Span. Richard Gage leaves 911. Truth in a time warp. Now, let me tell you that we published those in 2011. There’s never been a refutation coming from architects and engineers, steve Jones, Kevin Ryan, the whole bunch. They have never disputed our claims about nanothermite, which were based on a rather thorough search of the scientific literature.
So on that basis, I think is prime apascia to me, evident that your case is weak. Your case is weak. Common sense would tell you that my case is strong. You need to look, I’m telling you, I’m open minded. If I got something wrong, if Mark itauer, and I need to reconsider. But we’ve never had a reputation coming from the nanothermite crowd, which would have the keenest motive to defend and debunk us, they have never done it. You’ve never even read our articles. So I say, unless you can put up something here to substantiate your view, which I’m willing to take into account and share with Mark Hightower, you got nothing. You got impressions. You got a sincere belief. That is not knowledge. We did the research.
Turns out nanothermide only has a 13th explosive force at TNT. It’s a feeble explosive. My God. It was Niels Herod, who’s a professor of chemistry emeritus from the University of Copenhagen, who gave that estimate of how much nanothermide it would take to take down a twin tower of the, what, 29,000 metric tons. So these are the guys who are the foremost proponents of nanothermite, which you are not. I mean, I’m glad that you believe it. I’m asking you to share with me some evidence and let me take it into account.
Paul.
Paul, your thoughts? I had to unmute. Yeah, that’s all interesting. I haven’t done this research. I’ve heard you talk about the research that you’ve done. So again, I’ve not looked at any data regarding thermite or nanothermite. I don’t have a side to pick in that fight. But I think we can all conclude, based upon what we all already believe, that they’ve got multiple, they have an array, they have an arsenal of various toys. That’s what I like to call it. And they play around with it. If you’ve seen the work of some of these people online exposing these fires and the various things, I mean, there’s a guy saying they’re using some sort of plasma weapon to start fires in the ground, that they got trees burning from the inside out. I mean, that has to be just again, it’s a little bit frightening to think of the fact that we don’t know, but somebody does, and yeah, I’ll leave it at that.
Let me go back to Alan. Alan, you’ve been just wonderful and covered such a breadth. Give us your further thoughts. I mean, we all agree the military has technology. It’s not sharing with a public. The problem is to sort things out based upon the evidence available, the resources available to us. And I respect those who even vigorously believe it was done with Nanothermide. I can only explain to the best of my knowledge, based on the research I’ve done with a chemical engineer where we published three articles that have stood unrebotted. It doesn’t appear that Nanothermite could possibly have been responsible for the demolition of the Twin Towers. Now that it was used in cleanup or even thermite in cleanup. There’s no doubt about that. I agree that completely. Your caller did have some evidence, Jim. Your caller does have some evidence, which was, he knows a guy who told him and he was credible and said, and I can’t tell you more. And to me, that’s credible. It’s not even verifiable. I mean, that’s just that’s that’s just wrong. Sometimes trusted sources make a difference. I would be surprised if Alan was not being facetious. That’s like, official know you read those old newspapers. Official. I’m not being facetious.
I wanted to weigh in on what you just said, Jim, about these articles remain unrebutted. Okay. So in speaking with this friend of mine that I mentioned before, he’s got the degree in physics and a couple other people here and there over the course of time. So these articles that get published in scientific journals and everybody talks about peer review, they have to oh, it’s a peer reviewed well, guess what? These peers that they’re referring to don’t really review. They’re not going to duplicate the experiment, and in many cases, they’re not really going to look into it that much. So the idea that an article is rebutted or unreboarded, it doesn’t really mean a lot. I’m not saying that the work that you did, I’m not in any way disparaging it. Oh, my gosh, I got a train going by here. I don’t know if you can hear that, but anyway, yeah, like I said, the idea that people are going to take the time and do the contrary research, whatever, to indeed rebut it, it doesn’t really mean anything. That’s all.
I think you missed the context. This is exchanges with Kevin Ryan, Steve Jones, the parties who are promoting the nanothermite. If they could refute it, they would refute it. They haven’t refuted it. That is the point. It’s not that it went into scientific journals. These are publications that T mark Hightower and I made three of them in 2011 that for the best of my knowledge, have not been rebutted by those in the position who have the greatest stake and have the research ability to rebut it if they could do it. I mean, that’s the deal.
No, but again, I just want you to understand I’m not taking issue with what you’ve said and the claims you’re making. I don’t know, but what I am saying is what you just said right now is a presumption. In other words, if they could rebut it, they would. That’s a presumption, just so you know.
Wow. Yeah, we’re engaged in debate and they’re not offering even an argument. But of course, technically you’re correct. Alan, go ahead, add a few words. We’re about to conclude our conversation, but very, very pleased with everything you had to say today. Please.
I just want to say I was not being facetious. Sometimes if there’s a credible source and he can’t tell you more than they told you, I think that’s, it’d make a difference to like Jim and I have mocked before on the show, but I know a guy who knows a guy who knows a know. It’s like all these victim fake shootings where somebody always claims, oh, I know somebody that got shot or whatever and it just always turns out to be BS. But I don’t dismiss it just because the people who aren’t in the know haven’t. Well, it’s a heuristic, it’s suggestive, it invites further research. But we don’t even know who the source is supposed to be. I mean, how can we even verify that the report is accurate? Maybe there was a misunderstanding in the process. Not intentional, but a misunderstanding. But maybe that’s the point, is maybe not to be so firm at the conviction that it couldn’t have been nanothermite because there may be things we haven’t discovered or don’t know.
Well, look, all scientific reasoning is tentative and fallible, and if you get more evidence, you may have to reject hypotheses you previously accepted, accept hypotheses you previously rejected. What I’m telling you is, based upon the research I’ve done with a chemical engineer, it was fairly thorough going. The best supported hypothesis is nanothermite can’t possibly have done it. And there’s lots of substantiation from proponents of nanothermite, such as Niels Herrit, suggesting it would have required this absolutely staggering quantity of nanothermite to have destroyed a twin tower. That’s confirmation of our conclusion. It’s not a refutation. That’s a point I’m making.
Go right ahead.
Well, I don’t have anything else to add. I was going to say I sprinkHave a great weekend. Spend as much time as you can with your friends, your loved ones and people you care about.
The west is so eager to get into a nuclear exchange with Russia, we cannot discount it could happen almost any time, sad to say.
So, have a great weekend. I’m glad you were here at Revolution radio. And a special thanks to Alan to our caller from five seven five, and to you, Paul, for the comments and questions.
You’ve certainly contributed to an interesting debate. And we can all go back and take another look at 911 and how it was done with this additional information available.
Thanks to Alan. Welcome all. Thank you, one and all.
Author
