➡ The text discusses doubts about the case of Tyler Robinson, who is allegedly linked to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The speaker questions the lack of physical evidence and the strange circumstances surrounding the case, including the disappearance of a supposed accomplice, the suspect’s calm demeanor, and the confession via text. They also express skepticism about the crime scene being tampered with and the prosecutor’s office’s lack of knowledge about it. The speaker concludes by stating that the case remains unsolved and raises more questions than answers.
➡ The article discusses a crime scene that was not properly secured, allowing tourists and contractors to tamper with potential evidence. The author criticizes the FBI and local law enforcement for their lack of presence and security, questioning the procedures followed during the investigation. The author also raises concerns about the lack of cooperation between campus police and private security teams, and the potential implications this could have on the investigation. The author suggests that these oversights could have serious consequences for the investigation and the rights of the accused.
➡ The text discusses a crime scene where evidence was tampered with and the possible reasons behind it. It questions the official narrative of the crime, suggesting that the accused, Tyler Robinson, might be a scapegoat. The text also criticizes the lack of clarity about who is leading the investigation and the behavior of the victim’s wife. It ends by suggesting that certain individuals should take a polygraph test to clarify their involvement.
➡ The speaker discusses a case involving a man named Tyler Robinson, expressing concerns about the legal process and suggesting that the defense and prosecution are working together. He also talks about his plans to interview a prosecutor and his work on another case from his past as a detective. The speaker then shifts to discussing the role of sheriffs, arguing that they should be independent and answer directly to the people who elected them. He mentions an upcoming event in Washington State aimed at educating public officials about the Constitution.
➡ The speaker discusses the importance of local law enforcement taking responsibility for investigating and arresting criminals, rather than relying on the federal government. They also mention a potential visit to a person named Tyler Robinson in jail. Additionally, they promote Ezra Healing, a health service focusing on holistic care and treatment for various conditions, including vaccine injuries and cancer. Lastly, they advertise a financial service offering guaranteed returns on investments, particularly for those under 65 years old.

You know, I gotta say, if I were a prosecutor, this would be the last case that I would want. Erica Kirk actually told Candace Owens during this four and a half hour sit down. She said that Turning Point attorneys disclosed to her that they have nothing, they have nothing tying Tyler Robinson to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. There is no physical evidence that ties Tyler Robinson to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, other than what we have been told about DNA being on his grandfather’s 30 06, that he apparently was able to assess, assemble and disassemble and break down and put back together and wrap up in a towel and lovingly in bubble paper and place it ever so carefully so that investigators would stumble across it.

And he had enough time to do all of that. And I guess there’s rumors of wardrobe changes involved here somewhere along the timeline as well. And he was able to do all of that while simultaneously texting with his transgender furry boyfriend, girlfriend, who we don’t know if this person exists because now this person has just vanished, just disappeared. And the texts that were coming through to this transferry boyfriend, girlfriend were written in long paragraph form with law enforcement vernacular as if they were written by a cop. And while he’s doing all of this, he’s just really cool, calm and collected as somebody who his own grandmother has said has never been pictured or seen with a firearm.

And that this person had just pulled off the shot of a lifetime under stress, in a crisis, elevated heart rate in broad daylight, where 3,000 people are gathered in live attendance and there are CCTV surveillance cameras all over uvu and there’s cops everywhere on the roof, by the way, with a direct view of where we’re told that Tyler Robinson took this shot from. And all the while, while he’s texting, he’s so cool and calm that he needs a hot eat and a cool treat, stops in a Dairy Queen and confessed the entire crime via text, and then goes on to confess to his own father and to an unknown minister and to a U.S.

marshal, and then walked himself in or was turned in by his dad at the sheriff’s office, who cannot provide surveillance video footage of that, in my opinion, because that didn’t happen. I don’t even know if Tyler Robinson actually exists, to be honest with you. We’ve heard nothing from classmates or schoolmates. But anyways, as a prosecutor looking at this, I’m thinking to myself, well, that sounds like an unbelievable fairy tale. And that’s because it is. It’s because none of that is true. It’s because all of that is A lie. And it’s why there have been Green Berets and Special Forces operators who have had nothing but time.

How much time has passed now since September 10? They have had nothing but time to get on the range with 30.06loads, anywhere from 55 grain all the way up to 220 grain. And they can go to 143 yards at the same trajectory. And they have access to the firearms, and they have access to the ammunition. And they can age it if they want to. That’s what these people are telling us that they’re doing. Well, we can’t replicate or recreate the wound because we haven’t aged the ammunition. What are we going to do? Solve this assassination in 2060? Give me a break.

That’s B.S. that’s somebody who has been paid to push this narrative. That’s somebody who claims to have special weapons and tactics knowledge, who is looking at the wound that was created, the trajectory, the range, and the alleged firearm. Caliber. 3006 Mauser that was used and is telling you that’s ironclad. That’s B.S. that’s fake. And so these people, we have come to learn, are being directly paid by Turning Point. Why? Why are you creating sketch and sauce alibis? Why are you lying about details about being, you know, acting heroically and being covered in blood? Why are we running around removing SD cards from cameras and tampering with a crime scene? And as a prosecutor, I’m looking at the saying, we’re going to have nothing but problems.

And I don’t know why Tyler Robinson’s attorneys haven’t moved for a full dismissal based on all of these things, including that just two days after this assassination takes place, the crime scene is scraped up by skid loaders. And we’re not just talking about some kind of a light renovation of the scene. We’re talking about a foot and a half of earth. A foot and a half of earth is dug up. And of course, you know, I was thinking, well, if they pave over a foot and a half of earth that no longer exists, there is no way that at any time in the future, whether it be the defense team or the prosecution, could go back to the scene of the crime and do a blood forensics analysis or spatter pattern analysis or anything.

And now after everything that we have learned, they wouldn’t be able to find shards of glass either. Shards of glass that small, like the ones that were in the photographs of the SUV that took Charlie Kirk to the hospital rather than an ambulance, because an ambulance didn’t exist. And then, of course, before an autopsy could be completed, you’ve got the vice president flying in on Air Force Two as vice president, body snatcher flying around the country, presumably with Charlie’s dead body. None of this makes sense. And as a prosecutor, I’m looking at this going, I’m going to have a problem here.

I’m going to have a big problem on my hands. And this crime scene thing presents a real problem for me. I’m going to have to figure out a way around this. But it turns out that prosecutor’s not thinking about that because according to Sheriff Mack, who joins us again, you’ve had a conversation with the prosecutor that’s responsible for charging Tyler Robinson, and he says he has no idea that the crime scene was scraped up and paved over. Is that right? Yeah, a little bit mistake there. He’s not the prosecutor. He works for the prosecutor’s office. Okay.

The office that’s responsible. The guy assigned to the case to go to trial has not been assigned yet, so it could be him. I doubt. I think the head guy will probably take the case because, one, it’ll give him a lot of positive publicity. Would you agree, in your experience and in your professional opinion in dealing with prosecutors for your entire career as a law enforcement agent, would you agree that that entire office’s job right now is to comb over every detail of Tyler Robinson and the Charlie Kirk assassination? Of course, yeah. They’re not working on anything else right now.

Yeah, it’s. It’s possible that he still had another job. But I asked him personally, are you aware of this case? Of course he is. You know, the whole office is, as you’re alluding to. But I said, so I asked him flat out, I said, do you know that the crime scene has been completely compromised and that they’ve dug it up and paved over it? The word, the newspaper, the Salt Lake Tribune actually did a picture. Everybody can look it up. My daughter actually sent me the picture from the Salt Lake Tribune. And it’s in color and it shows kind of a brick formation of some sort.

So it could have been tiles that look like brick or had the same geomet geometrics of a. Of a brick. And they looked real nice. It looked real nice. And if I recall correctly, it was either the second or third day after the assassination. And a lot of people. This made a lot of news, and I’ve talked about it on several talk shows and podcasts that that would have been absolutely criminal for anyone to have done that. And the thing that really made me Shock was this attorney who works for the prosecution office did not even know that that had happened.

And he goes, oh, I doubt that very seriously. And so I had to tell him, you need to look at the Salt Lake Tribune because this. Doubt that very seriously. This is publicly available information that people are on the Internet complaining about, raising alarms about screaming and yelling about. They’re covering the crime scene. Yeah. Of the most prolific assassination of our lifetime. Yeah. And it wasn’t as. That remains completely unsolved, by the way. It does not. This. This thing remains completely unsolved. There are absolutely a lot more questions about this than there have been answers. And the prosecutor’s office, a representative, an attorney inside of the county attorney’s office that’s charging this guy doesn’t know that or says that they don’t know that.

Let me ask you this. You said that that would be absolutely criminal if this were your jurisdiction, Sheriff Mack, while you were the sheriff, and this had taken place inside of your jurisdiction. And we’re going to go back, too, because I got a lot of questions for you. Do you got the time? Yeah. Let’s go. Okay. Would these contractors have been allowed on that crime scene? No, of course not. Absolutely not. It would have. The crime scene would have been protected. Even if I had to put a deputy there 24 7, that. That crime scene would have been extremely protected.

But the FBI didn’t protect the crime scene in Butler, Pennsylvania, either. In fact, tourists were walking all over it and even up on the roof where the FBI was actually washing the roof off of the blood of the suspect. So I even made a joke. I said, why doesn’t the FBI just sell tickets for everybody to come trampling through? But that was a week later. This assassination, the most amazing assassination, as you pointed out, in our lifetime, except maybe for. In my lifetime. Jfk. Probably not your lifetime, because you’re not that old. Probably the same suspects, folks, this would have never absolutely happened.

And if it had, I would have been conducting another investigation to find out who authorized it, who did it, and who’s going to get fired for doing this. And now we’re going to have to undo that somehow. But to allow that to happen is absolutely unbelievable. And I don’t know if people recall this or not, but I’m going to remind everybody that here on the network we have the Stu Peters network has an exclusive source who provided us details about that. And this source knows about this because this source was a contractor that worked primarily with roofing at UVU and knows the entire process of how these renovations get approved, they go before budgeting committees.

You know, they have layouts of all of this stuff. It gets presented. Then they have to go and get bids from multiple companies. And let’s face it, I mean, obviously every institution has its favorite contractor, and it’s probably already sewed up who it is that they’re going to select. But for, as a formality, they have to, like, you know, go in and get this, get it bid. That’s how these things work. None of that was done. This was absolutely an emergency situation. We got to get you in here. We got to get this ground scraped up and paved over.

Yeah. And so that would have been criminal. You would have had that secured. Have you seen a lot of footage of the crime scene? Have you. Have you viewed the footage of when Charlie was killed that day? Have you really looked at it from your law enforcement mind? Did you see the police response or I should note the lack thereof around that crime scene? Well, see, but that bothers me a great deal. Look, I was a cop in Utah county. I spent 12 years there. School resource officer, undercover narcotics officer, detective. I worked murders. I worked bicycle theft.

Anything between shoplifting and murder. Rapes. I did quite a few rapes. I did crimes. I specialized as a detective. Crimes against children. And so doing a. Protecting a crime scene is absolutely vital. And, and, and I want to know, as a detective, I would want to know, okay, who authorized this and when did it get authorized? And was it just some ignorant employee that said, well, it’s scheduled to be paved over today, so I’m going to go do it? And, and he wouldn’t know that that was the crime scene. And go ask somebody if we should still go do this.

Let’s go back to the actual day of the murder investigation right there. I agree. What about the day of the murder? Okay, now, that one wouldn’t be. With that. Yes. The day of the murder, why was there absolutely no security? Thank you. None. Now, where was the police presence? We’re talking about an assassination, a public assassination where shots have allegedly been fired. There’s thousands of people. How many cops would be there? How many cops would you expect to see? How many cops would you. But there were no security points. There were no security points. You could have brought an Uzi.

Every single person in there could have. Could have had an Uzi in their backpack and the police wouldn’t have known whether they did or didn’t. How many cops would you expect to see? How many cops would you expect to see at a scene like that? 20, 25. And we just didn’t see that there were maybe five or six. And it was only the campus police. There were Orem pd, wasn’t there. Utah County Sheriff’s Office? Not there. State police? Not there. Until there’s. Of course, until there was a. A press conference to announce that they got the suspect.

And, boy, did the governor love that. You want to talk about one of the most corrupt governors in the entire country? I do, but not right now. Spencer Cox is the most corrupt. And we could talk all about Spencer Cox, but I want to cover this. Would you have. You’re a very important person in this whole equation. You’ve got decades of experience doing this, and you were the sheriff of your county, and you’ve been a detective. You would be what I would consider to be an expert witness that has the qualifications and the resume to weigh in on these types of things.

And so I take what you’re saying very seriously. If you knew, or if you later saw a video of what I described with people connected to Turning Point going and walking and trampling all over that crime scene and using the chair and taking down cameras and disassembling them and removing SD cards and taking them away from the scene of the crime, would you want to talk to these people? Would they be charged? Would they be detained? Would they be interrogated? What the hell were you doing? That would be normal investigative procedures. Normal, absolutely routine in all of this.

And it should have been done and could have been done. And one other point I was going to make about the lack of security. There was no cooperation or planning between campus police and Charlie Kirk’s own security team. There was no plan. There was. There was no cooperation. Nothing. That would absolutely never happen. We had a presidential candidate, Pat Buchanan, come when I was sheriff to Safford, Arizona, Graham County, Arizona. We were working with Secret Service. We were working with all the police departments. I mean, Charlie wasn’t the president, you know, I mean, he wasn’t the president, however.

I mean, I’ve been to places. Yeah, well, I’m talking about Charlie Kirk. Yeah. Okay. This guy was a candidate. Yeah. He. In fact, he was in the same boat as Pat Buchanan. He was a nationally renowned public figure. A political. Public figure. A controversial one, apparently. I don’t know why, because some of the things. Yeah. Anyways, I digress. So would it be a crime for me if I were on video that day going and saying, ooh, well, this is a very memorable experience. I want to make sure that I have the SD card so that I can Review this anytime I’d like.

Would I be in custody in your county if I had done that? Would I be charged with tampering with or removing evidence or contaminating a crime scene? That’s illegal. Those are crimes. Would I be charged with that? That would. That would be a legitimate investigation. And where it went during the investigation, I couldn’t say. Absolutely, he would be. But. Okay, so maybe I wouldn’t be criminally charged if I had a reasonable explanation. However, you have to keep an open mind, though. As a detective, you can’t make. You can’t make rash judgments. You can’t jump to conclusions.

That’s why we have investigations. And where that investigation would go, I cannot say. But I’ll tell you what. It looks extremely suspicious and very likely that it could have ended up that way. But you never know what people will tell you afterwards. Just like I’m saying about the janitor or the maintenance crew. They went and did it, maybe very ignorantly and innocently covered it up. But then I still want to know when. What, like you were talking about. I want to know how it was improved. How is it. How was it authorized and approved in the very.

In the first place? And how did that person do that? And why? This is a criminal investigation, and the question is fired. Yeah. Well, first of all, it wasn’t the janitor, and it was not an employee of UVU that did this. It was a contractor who should have been canceled and should have been stopped by law enforcement from stepping anywhere near that crime scene. So that, to me, that part of it doesn’t matter if it was the failure of UVU or they’re gonna say, well, this was an oversight, and this was a project that had been planned for a long time.

Bullshit. What about law enforcement that intentionally dropped the ball on this? It then becomes. If UVU is gonna drop the ball, it becomes the responsibility of law enforcement, of the sheriff and the police there to stop anybody from going on that scene. It’s an active homicide investigation, assassination investigation, public murder investigation of a prolific figure. See, that investigation is still this. Did. Did the investigation already cover the area? And they already got everything they needed? But even then, what about the defense lawyer? What about Robinson’s rights to have all of that examined? And now it’s just all disappeared.

And I would be moving for dismissal. Yeah, his attorney should be asking for a dismissal because of the destruction of evidence. There’s a lot of reasons why they should be asking about that, but that one, on its face, is. Is incredibly simple. Can you tell Me, what justification would there be or under what set of circumstances would I not be detained and interrogated? Or what would be an acceptable reason or justification or excuse, I guess you would say to you as a detective or as a sheriff, what reason could I give you that I was. That I was stepping on the chair where this person was sitting in before they were assassinated and I was trampling through the blood and I was removing cameras and SD cards and taking them away from the scene of the crime.

What would be a justifiable reason or something reasonable, an explanation that could explain that away exactly? Panic. An officer told me I could go there. Okay, let’s go. Hold on. Let’s go with your first one stop. There was no security stopping me. I was just curious. I was wanting to do my own story. Yeah, I, I don’t. Let’s just go through these ones. You said panic, but this person wasn’t panicked. And you can see them on video moving methodically from camera to camera to camera and taking the SD cards out. Nobody can. People act in panic.

I’ve seen people totally panic that were that you wouldn’t be able to tell what they were or were not doing. It’s not reasonable, it’s not normal. And so I would have to determine that through interviews with the individual. Again, I cannot draw those conclusions because I’ve seen crazier things. After an investigation, sometimes you get even crazier things than what it looks like. Sometimes I think that the craziest thing is that we’re being told that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk with a.30 06 and that there aren’t law enforcement people, that there aren’t special weapons and tactics operators, that there aren’t military people that are coming out by the thousands and saying, yeah, that’s not, no, that’s not what happened here.

I’ve seen an animal shot with a.30 06 before it disintegrates. Where the, the impact of the bullet is or the. And we’re hearing from some of these people that are paid to say these things. Well, it depends on the age of the ammo. No, it doesn’t. No, it doesn’t. It does not. I’ve never heard that before. I know. And, and what about this? It depends on the load. Whether it’s 55 grain all the way up to 220 grain. Sure, power behind the load makes, it does make a difference. But the delivery system is still a high powered rifle, a.30 out six Mauser, and the neck, which is basically comprised of some cartilage and Some muscle and some fatty tissue and the skin and then the spine doesn’t provide a whole lot of resistance.

If you touch your throat right now, it doesn’t provide a whole lot of resistance. I’m sorry. I don’t care if it’s 55 grain. Why haven’t these people been able to replicate or recreate the wound, in your opinion? I don’t have information that they haven’t tried to. I don’t know that they have information that they have tried to. That they have sent thousands of rounds downrange attempting to do it, and they have not yet been able to do it. Yeah. Look, none of it makes sense. At the crime scene that one bullet was fired from 150 yards away and it was an exact hit.

There’s no way. I mean, do you have concerns? Really unlikely. If you were the detective investigating this and, you know, you’re, you’re, it’s, it’s fresh for you. You’re trying to, you know, like there’s a lot to unpack here and you’re going through things and then, so obviously you’re watching the people that were closest. Charlie, and the people who had immediate proximity to him both that day and in life in general. Would it be concerning for you if somebody was saying that they acted heroically and that they were covered with blood, when in fact you have them on video just standing there texting and walking away, not acting heroically, and that there was never a drop of blood on them? Would you say, why are you lying? What if somebody’s lying? That would.

The term heroically wouldn’t come into it at all. I don’t care if they are or not, how they’re acting or if somebody thinks they’re a hero or not. I don’t give a damn. What I care about is the evidence. Would you be concerned if somebody that was right there started lying and saying that they were covered in blood when in fact they were not covered in blood? Well, it, you know, all that needs to be investigated. Absolutely. You would certainly ask a question, wouldn’t you? Of course. Why would you. Look, why would you say this? Why are you telling lies? Sometimes investigations get 10 different avenues and you have to pursue every single one of them.

That would have been one of the first ones to cover. When somebody’s telling. Yeah, when somebody’s telling a confirmed. There’s another problem here. Sure. Do we even know who, who’s in charge of the investigation? Well, we have been told that you talk. Did you ask, did you ask that to the prosecutor? I. I asked who was in charge. Nobody knows. Is it the FBI? The prosecutor doesn’t know. The prosecutors, the attorney in the prosecutor’s office. Okay, I understand that you said that we don’t know if this is the person that’s going to be assigned, and it’ll probably be the county attorney himself.

Okay, fine. But as I said, the entire office is working on this case. And you’re telling me that an attorney that works inside of the prosecutor’s office responsible for charging Tyler Robinson has no idea who’s investigating this case? And maybe he. And maybe he didn’t want to tell me because I was getting too snoopy or something. I don’t know. I think that you and I should go interview Tyler Robinson. How about the. Oh, absolutely. But, you know, how about this one? No one knows. Do you know. Do you know who’s in charge of the investigation? I know we’ve been told by the FBI, by Cash Patel, who also is a confirmed liar.

We have been told by Cash Patel that it is Utah officials. And then I think I’ve heard from Utah officials or somebody else that the FBI is investigating this. So they just keep passing the buck. The fact is, nobody is investigating this. They’re railroading Tyler Robinson as a patsy and they’re going to say that he did it and then they’re going to kill him. And then anybody whoever questions this will be coined a conspiracy theorist. Just as after the JFK assassination when they invented the term conspiracy theorist. Yeah. Can you imagine Jackie oh, running around saying, please don’t investigate my husband’s death.

And anybody who’s doing that obviously has some sort of a demonic agenda and they’re just trying to sabotage my life. Can you imagine Jackie O. Saying, please, please stop looking into my husband’s death? No, because she never would have done that. And here you have the wife and the. Now the CEO of Turning Point USA and the front facing woman who just loves fireworks and pyrotechnics and sparklers and glittery pantsuits and leather chaps and caressing, you know, everybody that she comes into contact with. Like she’s got the Jezebel spirit. Like she’s just some kind of a promiscuous whore.

That’s what this person is saying. The person who just lost their husband in an unsolved crime where her own attorneys are saying, there’s nothing physically linking this guy to the assassination of your husband, ma’. Am. And she’s not using her platform to come out and say, I want answers. I want to know what the hell happened on September 10th. My husband is dead. You know, I want to know what happened. And she’s not doing that. Instead she’s saying, stop, stop. That’s insane. I actually said on another show, I can’t wait for a week to two weeks when she comes out publicly.

She came out the very next day. You know what? I would like to see her publicly take a polygraph. Mitch Snow, the guy who told Candace Owens and told me on this show something that I believe because I know it’s true, he saw erica Kirk at Fort Huachuca on September 8, two days before Charlie Kirk was murdered, and saw her there with Cabot Phillips, her ex boyfriend, who she probably never broke up with. I would like to see her take a polygraph because Mitch Snow, who says that he saw her there, said that he would be more than happy to take a polygraph.

Do you have access to one of those? Are you talking about Fort Huachuca, Arizona? Yeah. Okay. Yeah. That’s not too far from me right here. You know, again, I’m not going to jump to any conclusions about why they were there. That’s kind of an unusual thing at first glimpse. Yeah, it is. Yeah. But there’s so many very unusual about this that really, really have some serious implications. Yeah. And, and how he pulled this off with that gun. And like you said, well, he assembled the gun on, assembled the gun. Never lined the scope. You know, and I will say this ammunition can lose its potency after a while, but it’s a long while and they can still fire.

And that’s old time ammunition, today’s ammunition, hardly ever. And so. Okay, tell me how old the ammunition was. Does anybody know? And obviously whatever he used in that gun really took off. But was it really a 30 odd six? Because that doesn’t look like 30 odd six wound to me. But again, I’m willing to look at it and I’m going to be, I’m going to be a complete detective saying I want to see all things and then we’ll draw the conclusions. I’m not going to make conclusions until I see the evidence and they’re not going to let me or you ever see it.

And that’s what bothers me even the most. And I, and I’m going to have an interview with this prosecutor. I guarantee you that. You’re going to have an interview with this guy? Yes. Like on tape, on video? No, I know it won’t be on video unless I get his permission to do that, which I’m sure he won’t. Why is it that these people. Why is it that these people who are servants of the public, won’t talk to the public? Oh, it’s none of your business. This is, you know, this is an ongoing investigation. It’s none of your business.

Yeah, an ongoing investigation. True. And even worse for him, it’s an ongoing prosecution, and I’m not going to be videotaped on that. And he’s probably right in that regard. I wonder if we could get an arranged sit down with Tyler Robinson. We need to somehow get our information to Tyler Robinson and have his defense team put us on the approved visitors list to go in there and sit down with him. Because I got a lot of questions for Tyler Robinson. But did you see the. Did you see his, like, his first arraignment, his first appearance in court? Yeah.

Did you see what he looked like? Yeah, that guy was on drugs. He never made. Now, when he was taken before the judge, what, about a week ago, he’s smiling, he’s interactive, he’s all doing fine. But when he had that first arraignment, just like two days after his arrest, he looked. He looked like the guy on television. They had him all hopped up on something, and I would imagine they got him pumped full of all sorts of different psychedelics and SSRIs. And I mean, they’ve got this guy just loaded up on drugs. He’s the patsy. I’ve seen people loaded up on drugs.

They had him there in. Yeah, they had him there in his transgender colored tie. I mean, they are doing everything in the world to dress this guy the part. And for the defense team to allow that to happen as well, it just tells me the defense team, the prosecution, is just like the right and the left in this country. It doesn’t matter. They are just, you know, two heads of the same bird, two heads of the same snake. They’re working in cahoots with each other. And I know that from smaller cases, public defenders and prosecutors work together all the time to settle these cases.

Well, on this one, I’ll let you get the full slammer. And on this one, if you could just cut me a little bit of a break and we’ll let you. I mean, they literally are doing this. They’re friends. They go out for whiskey after they get done with a day at court, probably with the judge. And, you know, they all just. Just like government. It’s all fake and gay. I’ll keep you posted about how my interview goes, though. But I. Look, I’m working another case with the. The. The prosecution’s office from when I was a detective 35 years ago.

And so I’m going to. I’m going to bring this subject up and I’m just going to say, what about all this other stuff? But I’ll let you know how that goes. But before I leave, I want to talk to you about what I’m doing in Washington. Yes, please do. Go ahead. Okay. So Mr. Mack goes to Washington, and I’m not talking about Washington, D.C. and I’m not talking about James Stewart. I’m talking about Sheriff Mack going to Washington State because it’s the worst state in the Union. And they’re attacking the office of sheriff and they’re trying to get rid of sheriffs.

And the attorney general there is suing Sheriff Wagner from Adams county because he was helping with deportation. And I don’t care if a sheriff helps with deportation or not. I actually think most sheriffs should be. However, that’s up to them. It’s not my call and it’s not the AG’s call. And the state legislature is now trying to pass legislation, make it a law that they can decide who can and who cannot run for sheriff, and that if they want to remove the sheriff for, quote, just cause, the legislature can just kick him out and get somebody else.

You’re a constitutional sheriff. And, I mean, you started an entire organization based on the Constitution as it pertains to the office of the sheriff. So when you say that you don’t know that every sheriff should be helping with deportations. I mean, if they’re upholding the Constitution, then automatically they have to be working on deportations. These people are criminals. They’re here illegally. Well, not necessarily. They can tell the federal government, that’s your job. And you know, some sheriffs have. And some sheriffs are staunch Democrat leftists and they’re not going to help anything to do with Trump or Homan or any of that.

And so they don’t. But the people to decide that is the sheriff and his constituents. That’s their call. It’s not the ag, it’s not the governor. It’s not the president. It’s not. Well, that I agree with. Yeah. Yeah. It’s up to them. The sheriff is independent and he works directly and answers directly to the people who elected him. Yeah. So don’t the people actually have the say? Really? Not even the sheriff? It’s the people. It’s the constituents who, if they overwhelmingly support something and they direct their employee, the sheriff, to do it, then they have to do it.

Yes. Whether they like it or not. Or they claim to be a fake Democrat or Republican, conservative, liberal blue, red. It’s all the same, right. If the constituents demand it. If his citizen, if his citizens want this, then that’s what he should be doing. And also, I don’t really know. I would argue with you too on the little details for you to say. Well, he could point back to the federal government and say it’s your responsibility. No, it’s not. It’s actually not. Because these people are criminals inside of his county. So it is his responsibility to get them out.

And if he’s a constitutional sheriff, he would. Right, Yeah, I agree with you there. Yeah. Article four says, Section four of the Constitution says the United States government shall protect our borders from invasion. But after the criminals get into my community because they didn’t or they helped them get there, then yes, it’s my responsibility to go after him. I agree. Okay, so details on the event. Do it, do it again. Run this all down. Well, we’re having an event this Friday. Everybody in Washington, you got to get there. If you’re from Oregon, Northern California, Idaho, a lot of people are coming from Idaho.

We’re having an event. Look at our website. The flyer is there, all about it. But it’s at the Experience Church in Puyallup, Washington. And it starts with a press conference at 1 o’ clock at the Experience Church. Then at 6 o’, clock, we’re having a Save Our Sheriff’s rally. We have a lot of great speakers. General Flynn will be the keynote speaker. And then the following day, we’re doing training for all public officials. That means former public officials, candidates for public office, sheriffs and former sheriffs, cops, deputies, police chiefs of police, we want them all there.

If you’re a chairman of the Republican Party or chairman of Democrat Party, whatever you’ve ever been involved in, that you’re all welcome. Because we want people to know and understand the Constitution for public officials, the Constitution for public servants. And we’re going to go over my Supreme Court case and the Bill of Rights and then we’re going to do a question answer period. And the media on this one is not invited. But if you wanted to come. I’ll get you in. Stu. Yeah, you know, I think I really appreciate the invitation. We’ll see if I can make that work.

The 9th of this month. That’s two days from now. Two days from now. I leave tomorrow. My wife and I leave tomorrow. Okay. Yeah, I don’t think that I can make it work. I’m honored to be invited of course, by you. I’d love to sit down and pick your brain more on this stuff. You got an extra day. All right. General Flynn’s gonna be there. I haven’t heard out of him much lately. Is he developing a backbone these days? He is asking if the federal government’s gonna develop a backbone and go after the people that need to be investigated and arrested regarding.

I’ll have to give him a call or shoot him a text. I’d like to know the corruption. Yeah. You know, since Trump was elected, there hasn’t been one arrest. There hasn’t been one arrest for Covid. There hasn’t been one arrest for child sex trafficking or for election interference. There’s been one arrest. Who have investigated and made arrests for those. Well, that’s great. That’s excellent. But you agree just to get your final on this, because I just want to make sure that there’s no question about this. If you are a constitutional sheriff and you are upholding the Constitution, that it is not the federal government’s responsibility that inside of your county, it’s your responsibility to go after these criminals.

Right. I mean, if you really are a constitutional sheriff. Absolutely. Absolutely correct. Okay. And that you shouldn’t rely on or wait on the federal government and whether or not the federal government chooses to operate in your city is what I’m saying. Right. Yeah. And they should not be allowed to. Yeah. Their feet should be held to the fire on this. All right, Sheriff Mack, thank you for clearing all of that up today. We really appreciate you joining us. And I will keep you posted on whether or not I get with the defense team for Tyler Robinson.

I want to get in there and talk to him. If he puts me on his authorized list, there should be no reason why I wouldn’t be able to get into the jail to speak to him, is there? Of course, of course. And I have family that lives in St. George, and I’m going to see if they know where his parents live. Fantastic. You know, I might just come out that way anyway. All right. I’ll get a hold of you if I do. Anyway, Sheriff Mack, thank you so much. I got a lot of questions that I would love to ask.

Of course. That I would love to ask Tyler Robinson. I got a lot of questions that I would love to ask this prosecutor as well. He’s going to sit down with Sheriff Mack. He’ll report back to us. Now, after this appearance, the prosecutor will probably be put on notice. Don’t say anything to Sheriff Mack about Tyler Robinson. Don’t say anything to Sheriff Mack about anything related because he’s talking to Stu Peters. Stress, anxiety, feeling out of alignment. You don’t have to live this way. At Ezra Healing, we guide you back into balance with our new health paradigm, personalized options and soul centered practices.

It’s not about quick fixes, it’s about true transformation. Our philosophy is do no harm model of care and we are really focusing on people with vaccine injuries. Our mission is to to help people understand what cancers are and bring solutions and relieve pain and suffering. No waiting rooms, no gaslighting. The Ivermectin is a moment in time in your life to get rid of parasites. And if you’re struggling with cancer, we get rid of cancer. If we have a vaccine injury, we’re going to alleviate that. But the goal is to, you know, eliminate, you know, anything, you know, foreign in your body.

So we use these supplements, these medications for a point in time in our life, eliminating anything that lowers your vibe. If you currently have money in the bank, a 401k or even precious metals in an IRA, you may want to listen up. You’re going to want to have a place where you have a guarantee on your funds. As we go into a lower interest rate environment, bank will be stressed out when the commercial real estate crisis happens. Right now you can get a guarantee, yes, a guarantee on your principal and get a 29% bonus if you’re younger than 65 years of age.

We can utilize an insurance based contract that has been around for over 100 years. And guess what, you get a guarantee on your funds. You get a guarantee on your principal. We want to help you find a guarantee on your funds that are actually outside of banking laws, outside of securities laws. Right now as interest rates are getting lowered. We only have this Special running to November 1st. Go to greenmoney solutions.com Fill out your information and let’s just see if you qualify.
[tr:tra].

See more of Stew Peters Network on their Public Channel and the MPN Stew Peters Network channel.