➡ In this webinar, the speaker discusses a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The study found that vaccinated children had more health issues like asthma, allergies, and chronic diseases. However, the study was not published in any medical literature, which the speaker believes is skewing the field and hiding the truth about vaccines. The speaker also discusses the difficulty in differentiating between various childhood illnesses, such as measles and German measles, without molecular diagnostic tests.
➡ The article discusses a study in Japan that used molecular diagnostic tests to identify viruses in cases of measles and other rash diseases. The results showed that complex spots, a symptom often associated with measles, were not a reliable indicator of the disease. The article also criticizes the efficacy of vaccines and the understanding of infectious diseases, suggesting that the current approach is flawed. It then transitions into a philosophical discussion about the nature of life, disease, and trust in oneself and nature, using the allegory of the Wizard of Oz to illustrate its points.
➡ The text discusses the concept of healing from within, using the example of Crohn’s disease. It explains that Crohn’s disease, an autoimmune condition causing inflammation in the intestines, is often treated with drugs that suppress the immune system. However, the author suggests that a change in diet, specifically to a low-carbohydrate diet known as the GAPS diet, can help heal the condition. The text also questions the traditional understanding of evolution and genetics, suggesting that the current models may not be entirely accurate.
➡ The text discusses various topics including the importance of observing nature for scientific learning, the author’s personal practices with water, and a detailed discussion on allergies. The author suggests that allergies are often the body’s appropriate response to toxic substances, not a genetic issue. They also emphasize the importance of quality in everything, from food to interactions, and criticize modern science’s lack of focus on quality. Lastly, they reflect on their decision to go to medical school and the desire to understand how living beings work.
➡ The speaker believes that modern education, including medical school and college, is overly complicated and expensive, and may not be the best path for everyone. They suggest that practical experience and self-learning can be more beneficial and cost-effective. They also express a desire for a more direct, person-to-person approach in offering and receiving help, without interference from institutions. Lastly, they discuss the possibility of shilajit, a supplement, causing migraines due to the release of stored toxins, and suggest remedies like coffee enemas or castor oil packs to alleviate discomfort.

Okay, welcome back everybody. Today is another Wednesday web webinar. Today is Wednesday, September 10, 2025. And thanks for joining me. And as you probably heard, a series from a small booklet that I’m writing about the main principles and ideas behind New biology. So I’m going to read chapter three, I’m going to switch over to the YouTube from whatever and I will be reading live questions that people put in the chat. So it would be great if you have a question, if you could write in this, there’s like a little box or something you could write questions.

So I know it’s not just something you’re wanting, you’re talking with somebody else about, but actually have a question if it could be. I’d love to hear questions about what I what I’m presenting. But if you have other questions, typically not something like I have my foot hurts, what do you think I should do? Because obviously one of the main principles of the whole New Biology clinic and the New Biology way of thinking is every situation is a story and we need to hear the whole story. So it’s really not possible to comment on individual situations, but more on sort of general principles of medicine and biology and life in general.

Okay, before I do that, get to the chapter. I must say I heard something today which I thought would be worthwhile commenting on and it looks like my sound is good, so that’s good. And that was, I’m not sure when the testimony was. I maybe yesterday or maybe a couple days ago. I don’t think it was today. And somebody who probably if you know Aaron Sear, who’s where I know he’s a for icann, which is Big Trees organization, which is essentially doing vaccine advocacy, more like anti vaccine advocacy or at least they would say advocating that real studies be done looking at the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

Anyways, Aaron Siri has been an instrumental lawyer and player in that whole movement. And what I saw today was a five to six minute clip and it was pretty easy to find. I just put in a search engine Aaron Siri, Siri testimony before the Senate. And that’s what came up. So it’d be very easy for you to find this. And it was very interesting for a couple reasons that I wanted to comment on. First, he talked about that he and Bigtree had communicated with somebody at Henry Ford Hospital, I think in Detroit about who was an infectious disease specialist and researcher and epidemiologist.

And they were well versed in doing vaccine studies and they interested him, I was going to use the word convinced him but maybe it’s just interested him in doing a genuine vax versus unvaxed epidemiological study. Just to say as a note, this isn’t actually science, we’re talking statistics here. So understanding this study has nothing to do with understanding science which is really the looking at the causes of natural phenomena. But this is a study using statistics. And I don’t mean that to say that statistical studies aren’t useful or valid or even might not point you to something that’s true.

I don’t mean that at all, I just mean it’s not science. But anyway, so they did this, they convinced them or interested them in doing this study and it was, they all said well designed and they looked at the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, which may be really one of the few if not the first time this was done. And you can see the results of the study that Siri presented and it’s no surprise to anyone here, the vaccinated had far worse outcomes as far as asthma and allergies and neurodevelopmental issues. Add overall chronic disease and on and on in something like 57%, don’t quote me on the numbers here of the fully vaccinated or even one or more vaccine children had a chronic, one or more chronic diseases, whereas in the completely unvaccinated it was down to 17%.

So this was a very significant statistics study. And Siri presented the results of this and what was then probably his main point is he communicated with this, the two lead researchers of this study who are very apparently reputable researchers in the field and they, I wouldn’t say they chose or they decided somehow it was decided not to publish this study in the peer reviewed medical literature. And I guess the, the direction for that came from on high. And Siri’s point was that’s exactly why doctors and researchers don’t know about the actual studies or the truth about the difference in the outcomes because if they get such a result then they refuse to publish it.

Whereas clearly if they got the result that the vaccinated were more, less likely to have chronic disease or less likely to be sick or take drugs or whatever, they would obviously publish that. But the opposite they wouldn’t publish. And that has skewed the whole field and made it very anti scientific. Although again it’s not science. And then, and one of the reasons I’m bringing this up, because that all sounds good and courageous and appropriate of him to bring this up and, and in a, in a fair and just world. And this may or may not happen.

These researchers would be subpoenaed and they would find, they would actually vouch for whether what Siri was saying is accurate or not. They would have to produce the data and the data would have to be made public and then people can decide for themselves. Interestingly, I’m all about people not believing just because Aaron Siri or because I, or Big Tree or Kennedy or anybody says anything but that those that information, that data is out there and that should be easy to find. So that’s the step that should happen. But again, one of the reasons I wanted to bring this up is this final statement by Siri.

And I don’t know if this is an exact quote, but it’s close. He said it is necessary and imperative for us that we combat the scourges of infectious disease and vaccine injury. So again, I don’t know if that’s an exact quote and I’m not sure if he used the word scourge, but something like that. In other words, we have two enemies and it is a we can and must combat infectious disease and the scourge of vaccine injuries. And to me, that’s where the whole thing kind of falls apart because I would ask if I was them, the other side, the infectious disease community.

So how are you going to do that? And I don’t think there would be any answer to that because as far as I know, there is no other strategy that he or anybody has, except maybe taking the dye out of the Fruit Loops that will do that. And I don’t think even they would argue that taking dye out of Fruit Loops will stop measles from being a significant illness. Now the maddening part for me of course is the argument that the whole anti infectious disease argument is so incredibly simple and straightforward. So let me give you a what I mean by that.

According to the cdc, there is no way to clinically differentiate a case of measles from German measles or you know, scarlet fever or fifth disease or many other so called viral or infectious disease childhood illnesses that come with rash. There’s no history that, that reliably differentiates them. There’s no, there’s no sign, there’s nothing a doctor can see that says for sure that this rash is measles and this is German measles and this is scarlet fever. So there’s no history, there’s no symptoms and there’s no physical exam signs that differentiate them. That’s what the CDC says. Therefore you have to do molecular diagnostic tests which have only been in widespread use and I’m not sure when, but let’s say in the 90s, therefore before 1990, we had no idea really who had measles and who had some other childhood rash provoking illness.

And this has been epidemiologically shown over and over again. And it is the official position of the CDC. Now the only thing they say to say, well, how do we get these numbers of who had measles and what happened with the vaccine in 1930, before we had any of these tests, how could we possibly have known whether children died from measles or something else? Because we’re just admitted that we can’t differentiate the two. But then they say, but there is one pathognomonic, which means unique characteristic of measles. That was how clinicians, doctors and parents of old differentiated measles from all the other childhood illnesses with rash.

And that is the presence of complex spots in the mouth. So that was the only thing in symptom wise or sign wise, physical exam wise that allowed people to differentiate between measles and any other so called childhood illness. And so that’s what they’re, we’re banking on. Even though then they say only 40 to 60% of children who they say have measles based on now molecular diagnostic tests actually have complex spots, which means 40 to 60% don’t. But then just the other day I was looking around and I found this, which throws some interesting light on the whole thing.

And so hopefully you can see this. And this is the association between documentation of complex spots and laboratory diagnosis of measles and other rash diseases in a national measles surveillance program in Japan published in frontiers of Microbiology 2019. So this is fairly recent and you can go down into the abstract and you can see that they used PCR and RT PCR and probably antibody tests, the kind of molecular diagnostic test they say differentiates one virus from the other. And they say complic spots were observed in 23.7% of the cases. So not that many cases, but in these cases only 28.2% could they find the measles virus.

Whereas the German measles, the rubella virus, was detected in 17.4%. Other viruses were detected in 51 cases having the spots 7.1%. In some of these cases, two or more viruses, two or three viruses, such as Parvo, Human Herpes Virus type 6 also were detected, which means, and I will get out of this, that complex spots clearly cannot be used for a diagnosis of measles and this is using their own bogus way of using PCR and RT PCR tests to diagnose or to determine which virus was present. So, using their own way of doing business, they clearly come to the conclusion that nobody had any idea whether anybody had measles or not based on signs, symptoms, or the presence or absence of complex spots could have been any other virus or any other childhood disease.

So all information about the efficacy of the vaccine and how many people it presented prevented from having this or that or how many stopped having measles, all that before these tests is obviously completely bogus. Completely. We have no idea. As admitted by their own science, they have no idea who has it and who doesn’t. Therefore, no information about the efficacy historically of the vaccine is valid with measles. And the same is for all the other diseases. Which means the whole thing is based on a house of cards. Which means until these people who are fighting against vaccines learn to understand the new biology principles and.

And there is never going to be a way to fight infectious disease because it doesn’t exist. And if you admit that it does, you’re going to have to figure out which one is which, which is going to get you into a quagmire. And then you’re going to always come back to vaccines based on bogus research, and you will be in a forever on a hamster wheel to nowhere because you will never win that argument based on saying that we need to stop the scourge of infectious disease and the scourge of vaccine injury, because you can’t do both.

Okay, so that was the little rant about that. Just so nobody is confused about that. So now we’re on chapter three. And the title of chapter three is the Steps. And as I have done before, I’m not going to make any comments. I’m just going to read this just as it’s written, and then I will switch over to YouTube and look at the chat and see if there’s any questions. Okay? Chapter three, the Steps. Okay, let’s recap a bit. It seems that in former times, and maybe not that long ago, our world was a very different place.

Trees grew as tall as mountains. The most beautiful buildings and structures imaginable were created all over our world. Canals were built and pyramids, megaliths, and enormous stones were moved in ways we can’t even fathom today. Underneath all this was a very different conception of biology. And living beings. Seemingly everyone knew, not just believed, but knew deep in their bones, that they lived in a created, purposeful, magnificent, living Universe. They knew this in their bones because in fact, their bones themselves, being frozen music were created from the same sound frequencies as was the entire world. They sensed the pentatonic scale in the formation of the four sets of five baby teeth.

And the octave in the subsequent four sets of eight adult teeth. They knew that the spirals underlying the formation of all life, all life from the spiral vortex on the top of our heads to the spiral patterns of the echinacea or sunflowers, were no accident. They were the visible imprint of the creative spiral force that made our world. They knew that man and woman, being formed in the image of God, had a special role to play in all of creation. This meant our lives are an act of creation, of purpose, replete with meaning. And it is this meaning which underlies all illness.

Somehow the individual, the family, or the community had lost its purpose. The connection to the wholeness of nature had become fractured or severed. Healing the root word meaning, the restoration of wholeness, was simply and clearly a process of re establishing meaning, purpose and connection. Life wasn’t perfect, but it was real. Then came the catastrophe. Instead of creation, there was only chance, random encounters. Instead of purpose and meaning, there was only emptiness and insignificance. Instead of beauty, our world started to be filled with ugly, even grotesque landscapes. This conceptual framework directly led to our modern ideas such as quantum physics, atomic theory, evolution, genetics, germ theory, immune theory, viruses, and so on.

Disease, instead of being about meaning and connection, became random events based on chance mutations or happenstance encounters with germs. Humanity was and is at a real risk of being lost, maybe for good. But then some, few people, very scattered at first, said what to me are the real magic words. These words are simply, hey, wait a minute. I learned to say these words early in my life. I was taught to hate certain people because of where they were born or their religion. Eventually, I met some of these other people. And they seemed to be perfectly kind and friendly people.

I said, hey, wait a minute. Why do I need to hate them? I was told that my government was fair and just. But hey, wait a minute. Why are we dropping bombs and killing people who barely even know where the US Is located? I saw that when I got sick and let the fever run its course. That sickness is not the evil we were told. That may be the first step. It’s the hey, wait a minute step. Each time you hear or see something and a feeling wells up from somewhere inside you that this whatever doesn’t seem right, some of us, probably most of those listening or reading this Booklet have a strong and well developed.

Hey, wait a minute. Voice inside you. For others, it is weak, a kind of dim remnant of past memories and authority figures, admonishing you to put your trust in them. This first step, in essence, is putting your trust in the only place it ever belongs or belonged in the first place that is in your heart. Interestingly, in the genius of language, heart is an anagram of the word earth. The earth that is nature is the other place to put your trust in the created world, not the man made manufactured world. This placement of our trust is the foundation for all future steps.

For once we confidently can walk in the trust of ourselves and in the natural world around us, a kind of joy, peace and calmness can enter our lives. In modern terminology, this means the relaxation of the sympathetic nervous system and the activation of the parasympathetic nervous system. And as all traditional medical systems know, this is the prerequisite, the first step in all healing journeys. Rest, digest. Let your mind and heart be calm. Everything will be all right. Last night, as I lay in bed, another way of understanding this came to me. I was lying down with one arm covering my right eye.

It was mostly dark in the room. I put my other hand over the uncovered eye. I looked with my uncovered eye and all I could see was the hand covering my eye. Then I uncovered the other eye and could see the darkened room. I moved back and forth between the eyes with one eye only my hand, the other no hand, and the whole room. This change in perspective was. Was of course, immediate. In the one scenario, all that existed is my hand. In the other scenario, I am in my warm, inviting bedroom. Furthermore, clearly it is I who controlled which perspective to see this scenario immediately reminded me of Plato’s allegory of the cave and the allegorical tale we call the wizard of Oz.

In that beautiful and profound story, Dorothy, the heroine, starts out in her beautiful, idyllic home, surrounded by her loving family. Then the catastrophe hits. She is thrown into a world filled with evil, deception and lies. She goes on a journey to find her way home, encountering and overcoming many of these deceivers and evils along the way. Finally, she arrives at the source of the deception, the authority known as the wizard of Oz. Dorothy and in particular, her little dog. Animals, being far less susceptible to lies and deception, quickly reveal the true nature of this external authority, the one who dictates and rules over others.

As she and we then learn the lesson that the power to go home, to heal, was always yours. The whole time. All you have to do is click your heels or uncover your eyes and repeat the words. There is no place like home. Home is peace, safety, and the sheer joy of being alive. As if by magic. Once the key is discovered, the gate is easily unlocked. New biology. Medicine, at its core is simply a way of naming the deceptions, then reminding the people that the power and the agency, as with Dorothy, is always within us.

All we have to do is uncover our eyes, click our heels, know that we will soon be back home. In the next chapter, we begin to look at some of the ways we can use to help us uncover our eyes. Okay, thank you for listening and going to see if I can go now to the chat. And here we are. A lot of people. So the first question here is, what about Crohn’s disease? And there wasn’t a whole lot of other stories, but so the, you know, so let me just talk about Crohn’s disease in general.

You know, as with many other situations in conventional medicine, the etiology, the cause of Crohn’s disease is unknown. We say it’s an autoimmune disease, meaning that there are antibodies. The definition of an autoimmune disease is there are antibodies that are for some reason confused and have decided to target your intestinal lining. And so that creates an inflammatory response in the lining of your intestine and that causes a profuse diarrhea and even bloody diarrhea. And that’s what you see as the sort of pathological hallmark of ulcerative colitis. Sorry, Crohn’s disease. Crohn’s disease typically is higher up in the intestines, more like the small intestine or the first part of the large intestine, as opposed to ulcerative colitis, which is a very similar inflammatory response.

And that’s more in the lower parts of the large intestine. So what causes this? They don’t know. They don’t know why there’s antibodies. And so they basically, the treatment is various drugs to disarm, disable your so called immune system. And basically what they’re doing is, with the drugs is stopping your body from making an inflammatory response. And so that will result in the symptoms appearing to get better. Because without inflammation of the lining of the gut, there’s no diarrhea and there’s no blood and there’s no mucus. And take it from me, who have seen many, many, many people, is anytime somebody is taking Remicade or Humira or all the other so called biologics, steroids to stop the Inflammatory response.

As soon as they stop that inflammatory response, stop those drugs, the symptoms will come back worse than they ever were, in which case you need to be on the drugs, they say, for life. Because if you ever stop, you will be worse than you’ve ever been before. And that’s exactly what you would predict if, from a new biology standpoint, the inflammation is there to have an effect, to get rid of something that isn’t right in the lining of your gut. Now, what’s interesting about that is both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease have been known for, let me guess, 30, 40 years to respond to a diet called the specific carbohydrate diet, which was essentially the forerunner of the GAPS diet.

In other words, there is a situation, because of the inflammation of the lining of the gut that makes it so that you can’t digest certain kinds of carbohydrates or most any carbohydrate. So when you keep eating the carbohydrates, that causes you not to be able to digest. You can’t digest it because you don’t have the enzymes and the digestive components that are found in the lining to digest it. And so the carbohydrates themselves act like a toxin, and then they create more of an inflammatory response. And then you get this vicious cycle. And. And so I think there was even a book written about this called Breaking the Vicious Cycle.

So essentially, they put people on what we now know as the GAPS diet, or just more like a broth, kind of almost like a carnivore, paleo type diet with almost no carbohydrates. And usually between two and six months, the situation would be a lot better and people would start to heal and you would also start to repopulate the gut with. With the microbes. But that also happens on its own. And then in time, you restore the person, the people, back to wholeness. So the only good thing about ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease is it’s one of those situations that has horrible symptoms, very difficult to live with, very painful, but is eminently and almost, I would say, easily.

I mean, the program isn’t easy, but it’s clearly able to be healed. And certainly anybody at the new biology clinic can help you with this. It is an eminently treatable condition because it has all to do with changing the diet and also sort of understanding why there is this situation of why you would attack your own intestines. And that becomes the sort of quest to find the meaning in this. So. And the diet and even fasting and the broth and the probiotic food will all help with that. And that journey should be very doable and successful.

Okay, so, yeah, there’s some other questions here that have to do with ulcerative colitis, but. Or Crohn’s disease, and you do get fistulas and all kinds of nasty things happen. But again, this is something that basically it’s a diet, and starting with this very strict GAPS diet, and there’s some other natural medicines that should help along the way, and this should be eminently healable. So here’s a question based on what I was saying. I agree with you that random mutations in natural selection can’t build animals. But do you think evolution could have happened not via that supposed mechanism, but by an intelligent process? I mean, the interesting and great part of that question is the idea of how you go from a creative universe that has intention and purpose, and out of that you create what we think of as physical living beings and the physical created Earth, as far as I can see, I know I certainly have no idea the mechanism of how that happened.

So the question gets it, could it have happened through the process we call evolution? It’s just that it was somehow guided so that the. The reason why this mutation was selected as opposed to that mutation was because there was some intelligent guide directing the process. The problem with that is that assumes that the whole DNA genetics mutation model is correct. And as I’ve gone over many times, there are many reasons to understand that that whole DNA is the code for life, because, for instance, we have different DNA in all the different tissues of our body. So how could it be just the code for the entire organism? So that’s not possible.

Second of all, mutations, almost always, according to them, and even if we don’t really think that mutations have anything to do with anything, but according to standard science, only result in negative outcomes. So how could you build something as genius and beautiful and perfect as a cat or a person or an elephant or a rosemary plant or anything based on a system that, as far as we can see and test, only ends up with worse outcomes? We don’t ever see in the laboratory a mutation which has a beneficial effect. We see adaptations that have beneficial effect.

And certainly organisms adapt to their environment. And in a sense, the environment that an animal or a plant lives in, or even a person to a certain extent, even forms the organism, forms their teeth, forms their anatomy, forms their physiology, but not through the genetic mutation, random natural selection process. And I don’t think that it’s even possible that that would be. It would be. It’s just not the correct model. You know, some of the reasons I’ve got into this is so that whole DNA makes MRNA in the nucleus and then it goes to the ribosomes in the cytoplasm.

But as I’ve said over and over again, there’s no ribosomes and translation can’t happen there. There’s too many proteins, which are the sort of building blocks they tell us of life compared to these gene codes. Nobody can even tell you what the definition of a gene is. They say that the DNA makes the MRNA in the nucleus, but there’s no holes in the nucleus membrane that are big enough to let the MRNA out. So how does it get out? And there’s no answer to any of these questions. And I think that the bottom line is we have to get rid of the whole model because it’s just materialistic, reductionistic, incorrect way of looking at the world.

So somebody, people love to ask about Strafanthus, which is great. If I’ve been using the spagyric Strafanthus extract for mild heart palpitations, and it helps. I also have the regular extract. Is it also safe to use for mild palpitations? Again, as far as I know, after decades of using Strafanthus, I’ve seen essentially no negative repercussions and used basically as directed, which is anywhere between three and 30 drops two or three times a day, depending on your reaction to it. And assuming you don’t have any major imbalances in your electrolytes, in particular potassium, and you’re not bradycardic, meaning a heart rate under, say 50.

Otherwise there’s no contraindications and it should be just fine. Okay, I homeschooled my boys and we’re going over scientific methods. It’s so interesting what is taught versus what is practiced. I don’t see a question in there, but it certainly is. And people have asked me, is there anything written to help children understand this? And that’s partly why I’m writing these, although they’re not written for children. And I’m not sure that I know of any good new biology books written for children. But I think it’s really a question of going out and interacting with, looking at nature, interacting and caring for plants and animals and just trying to ask, understand how, particularly animals, how they choose what to eat, what they do when they’re sick or not doing well, and how they just go about doing their lives and the nature Itself will teach you a lot about science.

Somebody asked whether, because I say you should gather fresh water and structure it with the analemma one, isn’t this redundant with the spring water being naturally structured? The answer is yes. And I do it anyways. Either use the analemma wand or put it through a mea water vortex thing. Why do I do it? I don’t know. I think it’s fun and I can’t really tell any difference, but I don’t think you really have to do it. But I like fiddling and manipulating and working with water, so that’s why I do it. Trying to get down to see if there’s any questions.

Here’s an interesting question, I think do allergies exist? Can people have gluten intolerance? And the question above that is, if Alpha Gal syndrome is not caused by a tick bite, what are the some possible causes of an adult suddenly developing an allergy to red meat? Interestingly, the Baileys maybe a year or so ago did a whole program on the nonsense called Alpha Gal syndrome. And so I would go to their website and check that out because they, they went through all the papers claiming this was a real entity and claiming it may have something to do with a tick bite.

And obviously they came to the conclusion that there is not a real allergy or a real syndrome called Alpha Gal syndrome. And so it can’t possibly be caused by a tick bite. But what do we mean by allergies and can people have gluten intolerance? So an allergy we mean that you have an excessive reaction to often something to which by all rights one shouldn’t react to like pollen or a cat or good food like fermented wheat products, actually fermented Einkorn, which by the way is the only wheat that I’m currently eating because I think so I make my own sourdough, 100% einkorn bread and it’s really delicious and if you fiddle with it, you can make it into a good enough texture.

Takes a little work, but you can fiddle with it. And it seems that even people who are very so called gluten intolerance can deal with Einkorn, have no symptoms from Einkorn. So I think that’s going to be something that will help out a lot of people. But the key here with allergies is you have an excessive reaction to something that you shouldn’t react to. And the important point about this is you shouldn’t react to. Because if I said, well, if you eat something that’s poison. So if you eat like McDonald’s hamburger that’s full of all kinds of things which are probably not even from a cow, and then you get a stomachache, is that a allergy or is that just an appropriate reaction to being poisoned? And I would say that most of the allergies that are excessive reaction are actually the person’s having been exposed to something that’s actually toxic, like wheat that is poorly grown and is hybridized and grown in poor soil and then often sprayed with glyphosate.

And so they blame that on so called gluten intolerance or gluten allergy. And it’s not any of those things really. It’s just the reaction appropriate of your body trying to get rid of using diarrhea and vomiting and often then rashes if it actually gets absorbed, or mucus or sneezing to get rid of that which you never should have ingested in the first place. I’ve even had an interesting. I’ve read that even cats and there’s a lot of people allergic to cats. And as everybody knows, I have lots of cats here and we’ve had many people who’ve come who are supposedly severely allergic to cats who have little if any reaction around our cats.

And I’ve actually heard, and I’ve never seen any real study on this, that if you feed cats a raw meat diet and let them forage outside and you don’t vaccinate them, that the people are far less likely to be allergic to them. And that has absolutely been borne out by our experience. And it’s only when you put a, some sort of a emotional thing like don’t you think you should be allergic to cats? And, or if there’s a conflict in the conversation and then the sort of allergy to the cats comes back. But otherwise, if everything is harmonious in the conversation and in the environment, there seems to be very little reaction to the cats.

So my take on allergies is that most of the time it’s from. It’s not in what we think of as some sort of genetic allergy, but is the appropriate reaction to different forms of toxic influences in our environment, even maybe it’s not. I know that I’ve had reactions to cherries, but not cherries that have never been sprayed. And I’ve seen lots of people in my practice who don’t react to apples that have never been sprayed, but react to apples that have been sprayed and they call those apple allergies or cherry allergies or pollen allergies or cat allergies or gluten allergies, when in reality it’s just.

In reality, it’s just your body’s attempt to protect itself by creating a thicker mucus barrier and then vomiting and diarrhea to get rid of it, something that they didn’t want to tolerate in the first place. It also seems to be true that when you inject people with certain parts of certain foods or products, maybe even like pollen, but in particular peanuts. So if you inject children, very young children, with parts of peanuts, like peanut oil or peanut proteins as part of the vaccines, then they will forevermore, or at least until they come to understand what happened to them, associate that food, that peanut product with, I have been insulted and abused somehow.

And so the reaction, their natural inclination is whenever they encounter that same plant again, that same substance, they will have a reaction against it. It’s like a. Almost what we used to call a hysterical emotional reaction. But this time it has a physiological basis based in the memory, which is probably the memory residing in the water that I remember being injected, being stabbed with peanuts. And so anytime I’m. Anytime I encounter peanuts again, I’m going to protect myself because I don’t want to be stabbed again. And that is unfortunately, what we call allergies. As far as I can see, there’s no genetic allergies.

And I’ve seen so many people, and one of the reasons this is important in myself and many people who had more or less severe allergies, hay fever, whatever, all those people can be absolutely healed to the point where they have no symptoms of allergies at all. They can. They can ingest and encounter just about everything, but the caveat is just about everything that’s actually good quality. And so, again, this is the fundamental principle of new biology way of thinking. It’s all about quality. It’s the quality of the meat, the quality of the trees. Do you spray the trees? The quality of the secretions or the hair on your cat? Everything is about quality.

And modern science has no concept of quality. It’s all reductionistic, measurable, quantitative assessment. And the quality of something, which is how we base our lives, what is the quality of our encounter? The quality of this person that has been eliminated from the scientific discourse, which means we’ve eliminated everything that has meaning, which is hopefully what that chapter was about. Okay, if you. If I had to choose again whether to go to medical school or not to become a doctor, how would I approach this decision in our time? You know, it’s interesting, there’s so many things. And I really feel for young parents and young people who are faced with this decision who have an inclination to heal.

And that is a wonderful thing. Again, I’m not sure that that was exactly my motivation. I had more of an inclination to understand how a human being, a living being, actually works. And I thought I was going to medical school to find out. And unfortunately that was not the case, so I had to go looking somewhere else. But a lot of people do have the inclination to heal, and it’s a wonderful thing as I learned to actually interact with somebody and then have them say that their life has been improved because of that interaction. It is an indescribably wonderful thing to experience that and see that.

And I hope that just about everybody has that experience. But like so many things to do with going to medical school, going to school, going modern parenting, which seems to be very, very difficult these days compared to even when I was a parent of young children or certainly when I was a young child myself, we didn’t have cell phones and screens and all the fear based narratives and 30 vaccines or whatever it is. So it was much simpler time. And then you throw in the hundreds of thousand dollars in debt and I would say I would not have gone to medical school if I had to do it again right today.

In fact, I cannot see any reason to go to college. And I would also encourage people. Kelly Brogan Kelly Brogan did a recent interview with a woman who’s done a deep dive into college, university and what that means and how you can get all of the information and more and real life practical experience far easier, far better and far cheaper than going to college. So if you never go to college, you can’t go to medical school. So I cannot in good conscience anymore recommend anybody going to any school for that matter, but certainly not university or medical school.

I don’t particularly like most of the other schools these days either. Like osteopathy school or chiropractic or naturopath. They’re not much better. And I’m only, I guess, hoping for the day when there will be no nothing between a man or a woman saying, I would like to ask you how you can help me. And the person saying, I think I can help you. And there is nothing standing in between that interaction that anybody who wants to help can offer their services. Anybody who wants that particular help from that particular person can do it freely with no interference from any government or industry or business or insurance company, just person to person, which is the only way that the magic really happens.

Maybe the final question can shilajit trigger a migraine and are there contraindications? I mean, I’ve never heard of that. I didn’t use shilajit much in my practice, but I’ve certainly seen a lot of people do that. My guess is that if you take something and it provokes a headache, it’s probably liberating some of the toxins that are stored in your tissues, in particular your fat. And when that happens, you’ll often experience something, which is why many of the people we’re talking Gerson Diet and Gonzalez program and fasting will often use some way of stimulating the bowel movements, usually through coffee enemas or colonics or something like that, to avoid many of these reactions that you get when you start liberating stuff.

And shilajit certainly has the possibility of liberating things that are stored in your fat and in your tissue, and that might make you uncomfortable. And my guess is if you did a coffee enema or castor oil pack or something like that, that that would take care of the problem. Okay, as always, thanks everybody for listening, and I always look forward to hearing your comments. And I hope everybody has a great week, and I will see you next week.
[tr:tra].

See more of DrTomCowan on their Public Channel and the MPN DrTomCowan channel.