➡ Nino’s Corner TV hosted a podcast with Naim Vandreas, a remote viewer who uses his intuition to gather information about various subjects. Vandreas explained that anyone can learn remote viewing, which involves following certain methods to enhance intuition. He also mentioned working with a group on future forecasting projects, where they independently gather data and then compare their findings. The podcast also touched on Vandreas’ past projects, which included exploring historical events and mysteries.
➡ The speaker discusses their experiences with remote viewing, a method of perceiving information about distant or unseen targets. They mention their predictions about significant events, such as the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and assassination attempts on Trump. They also discuss their research on ancient structures like the pyramids and Gobekli Tepe. The speaker expresses concern about a potential future event involving a president, possibly an American one, based on their remote viewing experiences.
➡ The discussion revolves around the future of wearable technology, specifically health trackers. The speakers express concern about the potential for mass surveillance and misuse of personal health data. They also discuss the benefits of such technology, like tracking health and aiding in contact tracing. However, they worry about the balance between these benefits and the potential for privacy invasion.
➡ The text discusses the process of remote viewing, a method of using intuition to gather information about a distant or unseen target. The speaker explains how they enter a meditative state to focus on the task, and how this method differs from traditional psychic practices. They also mention how remote viewing can be used to predict outcomes, such as the winner of a sports game. The speaker also discusses their teaching methods and how they guide students through the process of remote viewing.
➡ The speaker discusses their experiences with remote viewing, a method of predicting future events. They mention a prediction of civil unrest in America and strange findings related to a comet, which they saw as a warning of negative events to come. Despite these predictions, the speaker remains skeptical and believes that the future can be changed. They maintain a positive outlook and don’t take their remote viewing results as absolute truth.
➡ The speaker discusses remote viewing, a natural communication skill that allows people to perceive things beyond their immediate physical environment. He clarifies that it’s not about channeling spirits or being 100% accurate, but more like having a gut feeling or a dream. He also mentions that while most remote viewers he knows are men, women can be good at it too. Lastly, he shares that he teaches remote viewing through a 10-week course on his website, Future Forecasting Network.

All right, folks, welcome to Nino’s Corner tv. I am with Naim Vandreas, a remote viewer who’s done some incredible work and I’m very excited to do this today. Name? Thank you so much for joining me. This is gonna be a stellar podcast because I am so curious in the world of remote viewing. Now, let’s just start with this first. Well, first of all, thank you for joining me. Yeah, thanks for having me on. It’s a pleasure. Name? What. How does someone get started in this? Does it take a special psychic ability? Can anybody do this? Yeah, generally speaking, anyone can do remote viewing.

It’s. Everyone has a. Some innate like intuition ability. And really remote viewing is just harnessing that, you know, learning certain skills and following certain steps to focus that and amplify it. So everyone already has the base ability of doing remote viewing. The idea of a remote viewer is just someone that follows certain methods or certain protocols in order to amplify what we would call the good data. So you’ve worked with Dick Allgire? I’ve had him on my show before. An amazing individual. And he’s kind of explained to my audience. It’s been a while since I’ve had him on, but he’s kind of explained to my audience how this works.

But in case my audience has forgotten, I’ve definitely forgotten quite a bit of it. Can you go through the techniques and ways to do this? And you actually hold classes for people to learn how to do this, correct? Yeah, yeah. Well, there’s, there’s really, there’s a bunch of different, like schools of thought or methods, you know, that remote viewing can be done. The one that I learned from Dick Allgar, he was my, my teacher comes out of Hawaii, the Hawaii Remote Viewers Guild. And basically it involves following a certain structure of techniques that occupy your conscious mind.

So, you know, your, your conscious thinking mind is laying out the format in a certain way, answering certain questions, and then there’s moments where you listen into your intuition and record the answer. We use a technique called blackboard, which is where you close your eyes. And we’ve trained our subconscious to put images in a certain spot when we close our eyes. So it’s opening a communication path with your subconscious mind and creating like on demand moments of what, what people would call like a non local perception or, you know, psychic experience. The way they use this, do they give symbols or coordinates or something like that for you guys to focus on, and then you meditate on that and then you come up with what you see and write it Down.

Yeah, we, we work blind, so there’s a target ID is what it’s called. So like a random, a randomly generated, you know, AFC 2 dash 14. You know, it’ll just be something random. And then we don’t really sit there and meditate. It’s more like a lot of paperwork. It’s like, you know, a session might be 15, 20 pages of doing different techniques. The first thing we do is we close our eyes and look for one and a half seconds for an image. So it’ll be like a quick visual flash and we record that. Then we move on to collecting, like, sounds, smells, temperatures, taste, textures.

So it starts with getting like low level type data. Like, oh, I hear the sound. Oh, there’s a smell. There’s this texture there. And that kind of builds up through the session to the point where you can kind of like have a little, like a little daydream where you close your eyes and like experience something at the target for a short moment. And then you can like interrogate it, you know, like, what was that? Why, why were they doing this? What was happening? And that’s how you collect more information about, you know, a person, a place, a thing, an event.

So let’s get into some of the things you’ve targeted, some of the things you’ve, you’ve seen. I guess you do this in groups or is it better one on one? Or is it, I mean, how do you, how do you like, say, okay, this is the target. This is what, this is the consensus on what’s going to happen. Does it, does it have to do with more than one individual agreeing and saying, yeah, we all saw the same thing? Or is it, can it just be one person? You could work alone. Like, well, you have to have someone who, like, manages the project or sets up the target.

So. But as a viewer, you could work alone with future forecasting group. I work with like three other guys. So it’ll be like Dick Allgire, myself, Daz Smith, Edward Reardon. And so we, we all work independently, so we don’t communicate with each other. We all will get like an email that says, you know, this week’s target is abcd efg. And then we all do our own work independently. And then we come on a call in the week and we all present our data and an analyst will look at all the work and like, you know, compare and say, okay, yeah, yeah, like, oh, could you all just come up with extremely different stuff? And then, and then some things are similar and that’s what you take to create the image.

Sometimes there’s really, really close cooperation. Like there’s stuff that’s exactly the same sometimes. Wow. So when there’s high cooperation, that’s usually a good sign that that might be some really strong, you know, strong data about something that’s going to happen or something that happened at an event or with a person. All right, let’s get into this. I want to get into the targets, things that you’ve seen. What kind of events can we expect? But first, folks, get your Noble Gold. Folks. When you’re distracted by headlines, the insiders are getting ready. Billionaires, big banks, even foreign governments and are hoarding gold.

They know the dollar is being devalued. They know the next crash is coming. So why don’t you own what they’re doing, what they’re buying? Noble Gold Investments makes it simple to protect yourself. With the same investment grade gold and silver, the elites are stockpiling real assets you can hold in your hand and keep safe in your, in your safe or even in your account, in your retirement account. Don’t want, don’t wait till it’s too late. Visit Noble gold investments today. Noblegold.com folks, I know Colin, Colin Plume, well, great company. I worked strictly with him. This is the place to go.

Noblegold investments.com. get on it now. Gold and silver are going to spike. All right. Wow. So there’s so much to talk about here. I don’t even know where to get started. Let’s start with what things have you guys seen that have transpired, that have already happened? And then let’s work our way from there. Okay, so like we work a couple different kinds of projects. So we’ll do like historical things, like past events that people are curious about. Like we looked at Golbekli Tepe, which is out in Turkey. It’s like a ruins of standing stones. We looked at the Oracle, Adelphi in Greece, da Vinci, you know, Ark of the Covenant.

Like, we’ll look at mystery, like ancient mystery stuff and gather some really, I mean, compelling data. Because a remote viewer says something doesn’t mean it’s true. But when, when it’s obvious that there’s good data, like, like for example, Gobekli Tepe, we know it’s like there’s verifiable stuff about it. Like, we know it’s a ruins, we know there’s stones. If a remote viewer is describing the stones, the things are buried there, this and that, and then they go on to maybe describe something that we don’t know, something that’s unconfirmed. The verifiable part kind of helps, you know, give some insight to at least say, okay, they were on target.

Like, they were. They were onto something. And then when you have like three or four viewers all coming back with very similar data, it makes for a really compelling session with, with that one with Gobekli Tepe, we saw a lot of stuff that was like Genesis, biblical type stuff, you know, like creation of. Of a being, you know, creation, really like a humanoid type. So, so like Garden of Eden stuff, like. Or like, would you say maybe genetic modification from aliens? Like, what, what do you. What, what. Really? When you say that, what do you. You zero in on what it is? I would say similar to like, Garden of Eden type things.

Like, I was getting biblical type terms like fallen ones and, you know, wow. That kind of. That kind of stuff. So hold on. Would you say Adam and Eve or the fallen were struck down and the fallen fell there? My, like my. From my data, I would say that that was a place where the fallen, you know, the fallen ones, which to me seems like maybe some kind of giants or something not exactly what we would call human. We’re doing some kind of experiments, you know. Wow. So you saw an impact or you just saw beings flourishing.

Like, what do you see exactly? I saw a per life lying down on a kind of like a bed with something, you know, kind of like an operation going on. I saw literally of a winged humanoid, like a. Like an angel coming, like falling down to Earth. So, I mean, it’s hard to put that kind of stuff into context, but it kind of ties in with what a lot of researchers are saying about Gobekli Tepe. Like, if you read books that guys who go there and look at the stones and research the lore, I mean, they’re.

They’re talking about a lot of the very similar things. And go. Beckley, Tappy is where that’s, that’s in, I think, Turkey. Turkey. So that would line up to maybe the. The cradle of civilization or. Yeah, it’s in that. It’s in that zone. Yeah. So, you know, my mind goes to like the pyramids of Giza. You know, now they’ve done some like, they have the technology to look like what’s under the pyramids, and now they’re seeing another whole structure that goes below the pyramids. Have you guys, have you remote viewers looked at things like that and figured out what they are? Yeah, we’ve done.

There’s been a couple times we looked at the pyramids about the construction, about you know what, what its use case could possibly be. Some of it’s. Actually there’s some things on YouTube that we posted. Some of that stuff is on YouTube. Some of the data has like stones being kind of like lifted or you know, floated for, for lack of a better term, you know, rituals, chambers, hidden chambers, energetic. Well, I just pulled up some pictures while you’re doing this because all these. Does anything kind of line up with what you saw? We actually should do a new one about the thing underneath.

But we did have a lot of our viewers had chambers underneath, you know, subterranean chambers. You can see that one on YouTube. I’m pretty sure if you search like remote viewing the, the Great Pyramids. There’s Daz Smith and Dick Allgire put, put some video out on that one. Wow. So, you know, we’re coming into some pretty critical times on this planet. I just want to. So there it’s, it’s 1, 2, 3. It’s like four images across and three down down here. One more down down here. That one right there. Yeah, that’s, that’s, that’s Dick and Daz Vid did a video talking about some of the data that we got with.

There’s Dick. Yeah, yeah, great guy. Great guy. So, you know, so this stuff, I mean, is it hit or miss? I mean, you guys, are you guys able to. I mean, you can’t really give a timeline, right? You can’t really say we see an event happening. Can you tell when it’s. If it’s past or future or is it something that. You can’t really dictate that. So if you see like, let’s say, you know, I’ve, I’ve, I’ve heard Ed Dames talk about. I don’t know if you’re familiar with Ed Dames, but he talked about remote viewing some kind of CME coronal mass ejection by this, by the sun.

Excuse me. And that. And they don’t see civilization making it. Right. They see civilization collapsing and millions dying and this and that. And I’ve always wondered about that, you know, but they say that they believe they saw this big orb in the sky and big explosions, whatever, and they always thought it was a coronal mass ejection. Have you seen anything like that with your students or, or colleagues? I haven’t seen specifically that. But the, the approach that we take with at, at FFG is every month we try and look forward to what’s going to happen like the next month like within 60 days.

So we don’t really Try and go too far out and say, oh, you know, what’s this thing that’s going to happen far off in the future? We try and see what’s coming up right over the horizon, which seems to be a little bit more accurate in terms of, you know, you know, latching on to what’s going to happen. So we try and target like the major news events coming up in the, in the, in the months, you know, in a few months ahead. And doing that, we’ve, we’ve had a lot of, you know, really stunning hits.

For example, these are ones that I, I had over the last few years, like the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Yeah. She was a Supreme Court justice. We did the next president of the USA in March and I had Trump. We published that online. You could see videos of that. Elon Musk, future plans. Like what, what’s the future plans for Elon Musk? I saw him closely associated with the president. And that was like before he was, before he was even talking, before anybody had any inclination on that. Yeah, yeah. The assassination attempts on Trump. You saw that? Yeah, we had that published online before it happened.

Let me ask you, let me just stop you right there. You saw the two that happened or did you see many more? Well, first I saw the Crooks event, the Thomas Crooks one, you know, politician talking to a crowd, gunman elevated on the left side mid speech. When we published that in I think March. And then it happened in July or July, I can’t remember. Yeah, July. And then there was the Ryan Ruth, the guy who was in the bushes. I drew his face and said, get out of here. Yeah. And I said, this guy is going to be a would be assassin.

He’s going to run away. They’re going to shut off the area and, and you know, look, there’s going to be a manhunt for this guy essentially. And then that happened the following month. Jordan Neely, Daniel Peny, choke hold on Jordan Neely in the subway. I drew that, I drew that the month before it happened. I said, next month someone’s going to get strangled from behind and it’s going to be a big news story for, you know, for whatever reason. And it was absolutely coming up. So there’s certain events that remote viewers can kind of like catch on to.

They, they, they, they resonate in consciousness for whatever reason. Those, because, because you’re kind of time and space is one. Right. You’re just kind of, it’s not linear. You’re just already seeing what has already happened. Yeah. The Idea is that in, in, you know, this, in the subconscious mind or, you know, however you want to conceptualize it. Time isn’t linear the way that we experience it. So certain events can be foreseen, you know, they can be seen before we experience them. And I think a lot of people are at least open to that idea because of, like, dreams.

Like, a lot of people have had a dream or it’s like they saw something and it ended up happening, or they had a really bad feeling about something and then it happened. So remote viewing is just taking that feeling that, you know, that sense that we have and putting it to use. Yeah, honing in on it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So what else have you seen? I mean, you saw Trump was going to win, you saw the assassination attempts. Is there anything else that, that concerns you or warnings you can give my audience? We, we had some data and of course, this is just, you know, this is speculative, right? Absolutely.

We’re not saying you’re predicting anything. I got you. Yeah. This is just, this is just stuff that we’ve collected. We put it on the record. If it happens, it happens. If it doesn’t, we miss, you know, remotely. It’s not perfect. Oh, yeah. It doesn’t mean it can’t happen later. Exactly. Yeah. That’s why we keep it on the record. Right. Okay. We did have some data that there could be a poisoning event associated with the, with the President. Oh, wow. I’ve heard that. Actually, I did certain possibility. I saw the, you know, a president, you know, I’m assuming it’s Trump, but let’s just say a president in a backseat of a car with another person sitting beside them and a death event happening associated with that? I hope not.

You know, I hope. Could it been maybe. Could it have been a past event like jfk? Well, my intention was to see a future event when I did that. So, you know, my assumption is it may be a future event, but, you know, hopefully that doesn’t happen. But could it. What could, Would it have been an American president? Would it could be any president? I, I think, I think it was, you know, just my personal opinion is I think it was the American President. You know, it could be, it could be someone else, but as a remote viewer, it’s not.

Some of the things are so brief, you know what I mean? It’s not exactly a clear as day movie most of the time. Sometimes it’s just like see a flash of something and you’re kind of pulling at strings to get, try and get some more data about It, I heard, I heard like, Mr. President, like someone say, you know, Mr. President, and, and I see someone slumped over in the back seat of a car. So, but so that you would assume that means the president, not the person next to them. Yeah, I’m assuming it was the, the president that got hurt.

That was my assumption. You know, when I had that, when I did that session. Um, that hasn’t happened yet though. So I mean, let’s just hope that that was, we hope it does not happen. Yeah, that, that doesn’t happen. Looking at, you know, we look at, we just recently looked at wearable technology. There was RFK Jr said like he wants all Americans to have some kind of wearable health tech, health track. That just sounds like they’re getting ready for the chip, but whatever. Yeah. So, so they targeted us on the future of wearable tech. Like, where is this going down in the next couple of years? And our data was very, you know, cooperating between all viewers that it was very much like a mass surveillance system.

You know, being able to pick someone out of a crowd and be able to know like, okay, this is their, you know, this is what they do. This is their health status. This is their heart rate. This is, you know, know, real time, like kind of real time tracking of, of, of a population. Isn’t that, I mean, if you think about it, the iPhone already kind of does that. I mean, it logs your steps. I mean, to say it’s not. You’re all, it’s always on you. I bet it reads your vitals. I mean, dude. Yeah, I, I, I agree with you.

I mean, we don’t wear it on us, but it’s always on us. It’s in our pocket. It’s, it’s in our, it’s in our. So I think the wearable tech is going to be the next kind of the next step before probably the implants. But one of the main things I got out of it was that it will probably be used in, and this is a throwback to contact tracing, what they would have called contact tracing during COVID Right. So it would, it’ll be a lot easier to do that kind of scenario if everyone’s wearing a, a health tracker.

You know what I mean? Yeah. So it’d be a lot easier to do what they call contact tracing. And if you think about it, that sounds like common sense. Like, of course that’s coming. Yeah. And, and that’s what I mean. Like, that never occurred to me just thinking about it. But after doing the session and then seeing the seeing the feedback, they said, hey, what you guys were looking at was health trackers, you know, the future of wearable attack. And I said, oh, man. Contact tracing, that’s what I was getting. Like, they’re able to pinpoint who’s near who and, you know, who’s been in what different place and what their health status are.

So that was kind of sounds like a nightmare to me. I mean, I, I understand, like, getting, you know, your vitals, wanting to know your health if you’re gonna get sick or something like that, but then they take it to another whole level. You know, you give them an inch, they take a mile. Yeah, yeah. I think there are positive aspects to it. Right? Like, yeah, you know, tracking your health, tracking your sleep. Some people got their life saved by having the, you know, I watch or Apple Watch or whatever, tell them their heart rate is irregular, but there’s always more, you know, there’s always that other side of it where it’s like, yeah, what are they doing with the data? How is it being abused? Which is the scary part.

Yeah. What else have you seen? So have you seen, you know, do you always just do a few months or do you do years? Do you do a decade? I mean, so. Because that’s kind of like. Because I’ve always heard that remote viewing, you’re not able to see. You’re not able to understand when the event’s going to come. Like a certain day or month. You just. I didn’t know. I thought you couldn’t decipher if it was the past or the present. But you’re saying you can decipher that? Well, there’s different techniques to try and, like, pinpoint a time, like when it happens.

The. The. I. I guess the most reliable way to, to try and find out something about a future thing is to have the task, like, when the task is set up, when the target is set up, have the time frame built into that. So, like, when we looked at the health trackers, it was a part of the tasking that we’re looking out a couple years. If I was just working on my own and just saying, oh, let me try and see what’s going to happen in the future. It might be a little harder to determine, okay, when is this happening? But when we get a tasking, we can look at it and then.

And we can read it after and say, okay, this is. This should happen in between, you know, 2025 and 2030, or, you know, whatever the year, whatever the years are laid out. I’d say that at least for me, trying to pinpoint an exact time that something happens is difficult. You know what I mean? So that’s why working alone as a remote viewer is a little more challenging. Like if you’re working with a group and you have like a project manager, people who set up the task and you know, make a good, make good choices on what the viewers are looking at it greatly, you know, increases the, the chances of good data and usable information.

Yeah. So like Ed Dames, I mean, I’ve heard that this is very much used as it used within our three letter agencies. Our government uses these techniques. Yeah. Remote viewing was developed by the, by, by, you know, with the CIA and in collaboration with the United States military. So they were using it as for psychic spies. Essentially, you know, they wanted to look into a base or you know, find out the status of a hostage or you know, different scenarios like that. So it, it was used in collaboration with other intelligence faculties. So they wouldn’t just like get a remote viewer’s data and run out there and do something.

They would like cross reference it. They would say, okay, well this unit is saying this and these guys say that and our remote viewers are saying this and they would put it together and make decisions that way. So they definitely found it useful. They, I mean publicly, they stopped using remote viewing, but in my personal opinion, I think they’re still using remote viewing in a secret capacity. I mean, why would you ever not use it? Why did you discard it? Right. So I had Stuart Swordlow on whose, you know, great uncle was the first Russian president and he was taken into, he says, Project Montauk to work in the underground projects and they were using children for these, these projects.

Now I have no way to validate that, but do you find in your remote viewing groups that maybe do children do better at this? Is it. If. Can you tell if someone’s more psychic than another person? I mean, how do you know if someone’s talented at this or not? And, and what classifies as someone being talented is it. And what type of people are the most talented? I would say children are probably more likely to be good at it just because they haven’t had all the societal training. Like, yeah, they haven’t been told, like that’s impossible and that’s stupid.

And don’t. So they don’t have barriers. They don’t have these barriers of. They don’t look at themselves. They just freely children. They’re able, yeah, they’re able to treat it like a game and just have fun and see what happens. Whereas an adult, you tell an adult like, hey, I have a, I have a photo in this envelope and I want you to describe it for me immediately. They’re thinking, okay, this is impossible. How can I do this? You know, So I haven’t taught that many children, but I know someone who does teach children about intuition and psychic type things.

And I mean, they say they have, they see great results in children doing those kinds of activities. When it comes to who would be good at it, people who are, are able to have like, sustain a focused intention. Like if someone’s like scatterbrain and they, you know, they can’t focus on something for, for more than five minutes, they’re probably not going to. So someone with ADD is not going to be able to do this too well. I mean, probably not. I won’t say no, but probably not. Like the, the methods we use are derived from the military.

Like they’re from the military method. So it is a very structured and rigorous type thing. You know what I mean? It’s not exactly all just like sit here and, and, and it comes to me, it is like. But don’t you kind of meditate? So, so it’s like, so it’s like their commands basically? Or do you kind of just meditate and see what comes first? Like how it, it starts in a, in a, in an awake and aware state. So at the beginning of a session it would just be like, I am right now, you know, I start doing my paperwork and then by, by, you know, 30, 40 minutes in, then I’m in more of like what we would call alpha brainwave state, which is kind of like a, a bit of a meditative state, a daydream type state.

So you’re still awake, you’re still conscious, I’m still writing, but I’m engulfed in the, in what’s happening. You know what I mean? Like when you read a good book, you know, 20 minutes in, you’re not aware of what’s around you in your room anymore. You’re like, you’re just in the story. Yeah, right, you’re in the story. So once you get into that state of mind, you’re the, the type of information that you can get, you know, increases like the, the experiential nature of it, you know, the visuals, the, the things you hear, the things you know, increase and then you, from there you can go into a, what we call erv, extended remote viewing, where you lie down, close your eyes and basically go to sleep for a moment and have an experience.

So there’s A spectrum of, of how it goes, you know, from wide awake to asleep. Yeah, it’s really interesting. And what about, but what about like psychics, man? I mean, like, why, why aren’t. I mean, do you guys converse with psychics? Do you work with psychics on this stuff together? I’m sure I would imagine the military does, you know, like, I mean, is there. Can that mess up the process? The military did have like trad. Well, traditional psychics that they did work with at ffg, we just have remote viewers that use military, use the military derived methodologies.

To me, it doesn’t matter. However, you know, if you, if you can get good data, you can get good data. To me, it doesn’t matter. I don’t care how you do it. I guess the, the idea of it being remote viewing makes it, in my opinion, a little more intellectually honest because I can say I was blind, you know, I didn’t know what the target was. Right. So you can’t tell me. You can’t come back and tell me like you’re, you were saying that just because you wanted to scare people, or you were saying that just because you wanted, you know, you have a bias because you wanted to go this or that way.

It’s like I, I really didn’t know what the target was when I was working it. So I’m just relying solely on my intuition, you know, I’m relying on what comes to me. Um, and it’s. I guess it’s a little more, it’s like a science experiment. The remote viewing method is more like a science experiment in that you can repeat it. You have more control over, over the different variables. Whereas a traditional psychic may work with the person right in front of them or may work with the question being asked up front. You know, things like that.

Well, I know there’s, there’s been psychics out there that have solved crimes for the FBI. I mean, obviously this stuff works. I’ve never heard of one winning the lottery. At least say they won’t admit it. Yeah, actually there’s, there’s some remote viewers who have won lotteries. Really? Yeah, there’s John Knowles. He’s a, he’s a remote viewer, but he’s a. Has a book on remote viewing, the lottery and, and you know, games of chance and stuff like that. So it’s not impossible. It’s definitely more challenging because numbers, you know, numbers and things like that are a little more like on the logical side of how our brain processes things.

So getting numbers is a little more, I Wouldn’t say it’s impossible, but it’s, it’s more challenging to get numbers because that kind of like flips you into a right and you’re just off by one digit, you know? Yeah. So there’s a bunch of different techniques of remote viewing. Like there’s something called associative remote viewing where you, for example, it would be like, who’s going to win the, the Super Bowl? Let’s say, for example, you got one team, Team A and team B. Instead of trying to like directly remote view the score or something like that, you would say, here’s a target of a dolphin in the water and here’s the target of the pyramids.

If this team wins, the remote viewer will see the dolphin. If this team wins, the remote viewer will see the pyramids. If. So it’s kind of like a got you. Yeah, it’s like a way around to try and determine something that makes sense to me. That makes a lot of sense. So can you kind of walk us through like an elementary, like for, for myself in the audience, like, what is a target practice look? Like, what is it? How does it work? Like what, what do they open an envelope? Does everyone get an envelope? They open it, there’s a target.

Like, how does this work? Back in the day it would have been, yeah, an envelope. Now it’s the more. Now it’s just all digital for the most part. You know, you would get, like when I, with my students, I would, I’ll send them target id. So I’ll say, hey, here’s the homework. The target is. But you know what the target ID is? Yeah, I know what the target ID is. When I’m teaching. Yeah, I’ll know what the target ID is. I’ll send them a target id and I’ll say, here’s the target id, abcd, dash, efg, whatever it is.

So they now, without communicating with me, sit down with their paper and they go through, you know, step one, which is like I told you, close their eyes, look for one and a half seconds, draw, you know, draw whatever shape, form, whatever it is that comes to them. Then they go into collecting low level data. So what do you, you know, what do you see? What do you smell? What do you hear? Do you taste? What’s the temperature? So they’ll do that a bunch of times. Then they’ll try and put all the data that they got onto one page.

We call that a sight sketch. So out of all the little things they drew and all the sounds and things they got, they have to try and intuitively put it together. Like, say, okay, this thing I drew feels like it goes here, and the sound of the voices and the people go over here. And then the last step is try and look at those individual aspects. So it’s like, okay, look at the people. You. You heard. You heard voices. You said there was people there. I want you to close your eyes for 12 seconds and try and see what the people are doing.

And tell me, you know, tell me about. I won’t be saying this to them. They’ll be doing this on their own. Like, this is a part of the process. They’ll try and look and see what the people are doing. If there was a structure, look at the structure, describe it, look at the land. And then they would send that into me. I would review it, and then I would give them the. I would send them the feedback and say, okay, here’s the actual photo, and here’s what you. What you should have, what you were supposed to be viewing.

Yeah. And then if it adds up, you document that and put it out there on record. For my students, it’s just for their. For their practice. Right. So they can get on track. But the same process for when we work with ffg, it’s the same thing. We all go on our own. We all get an email saying, here’s your target. We work the target, we send it in. Except for us, we got to come on a video and say, you know, describe it all, and then they show us the. Then they show us what the. The target was.

So, like, you know, obviously it’s a pretty big event that you saw where, like, the Trump has been. There’s three assassinations on him. Correct. That you saw two. The two. Yeah, the two. Because there’s the third one. You know, we don’t know if that. But you don’t know. But you did know the other two were him or you didn’t. That was my assumption. You know, my assumption is that it’s him. We’re not really supposed to go out and say, oh, it’s this guy. Right. But that was my assumption. But what’s your assumption saying on this third one here? Yeah, that is.

That is my assumption that it’s him. I’m willing to be wrong, you know. Right. And we’re not in 100. I agree with you. I get. I’m not putting that on you at all. But I’m saying that your assumption is it’s him again. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. That’s a pretty big event. Okay. But we’ll just Put that, we’ll just put that aside for a second. Is there anything else that you see coming in the next few months in fall or do you see, did you target any kind of arrests or fall of certain individuals or a black swan event to the economy or you know, some kind of natural disaster, anything like that? We’ve done a couple ones on, you know, upcoming financial turmoils.

We did one on civil war, if there will be a civil war in America. I think that one’s on YouTube. And we did our, you know, our results was more on the positive side saying that there would be something akin to a civil war. Did it look pretty extreme or did it look like civil unrest lead or did it look like an all out civil war? Are you able to. That one was, we kind of did like a little bit like that ARV thing that I was telling you for that one. So we didn’t look at the event directly but we looked at, we used remote viewing to try to determine the outcome of like if it would happen or not.

And our, and our, our results were leaning on the yes it would happen side. Wow. We looked at, we looked at that comment thing that. Oh, the three I atlas. Yeah, we just looked at that the other day, the atlas thing. And I mean, but you all didn’t know you were looking at it. You were looking at it. Yeah, we didn’t know. We were, we were completely blind. We didn’t know what it was. Yeah, I’m not into the, I’m not really into the UFO stuff and you know, I’m not deep into that. But a lot of our data was leaning onto the something strange.

I mean our data wasn’t exactly just a rock in space. Like we were getting a lot of stuff that was more on the woo woo side. So did you say what it was? I mean I had literally had saw a ufo. I mean that’s, I saw that at one point in my session. So yeah, I mean it is what it is. Beings inside of it. Was it. Would you. I saw a being too. Yeah, I saw something like a robotic, strange robotic type being. But I mean, so not a biological entity. It was more of a robotic like an Android type thing.

That’s what I saw. But the thing is with, you know, with the more unverifiable types of targets like that, I mean it’s hard to say if it was any good. Right? I can’t say with full confidence like, oh yeah, I’m, I’m 100 behind that. It’s kind of just like, hey, that’s What? That’s what I got. We’ll see what, we’ll see what comes of it. What did other people see? They all see the same type of thing. Yeah, we all had like, what would the word be? Paranormal type, data, energetic stuff, spirit, you know, spiritual type stuff.

Definitely not what I would expect for if it was just a comment. You know what I mean? If it was just a, just a comment. So, um, that’s a strange one. And I know there’s some reports of PE scientists or researchers saying that it’s weird, like it’s moving at a fast speed, it’s exhibiting some kind of things that aren’t exactly normal to a comet. It’s intelligent is what they’re saying. And then they’re also, there’s Chilean scientists deciphering code from it saying that we are arriving, something like that. You know, people could say that’s woo, woo, whatever.

But it’s definitely making the headlines right now. So to me, I think there could be something there. It could be nothing, right? Could just fly by. A comment. But do you see contact or anything like that? I mean I had, I had something coming down to the surface in my session. So yeah, I’m not, like I said I’m not, I don’t like to. Because the, the thing is like someone will say, remote viewer will say something and people run, run with it and they, and they go crazy with it. I’m skeptical, I’m skeptical of myself. Especially when it’s like a target like that.

We’ll just say it was data that was unexpected for an. If it was a natural phenomenon, if it was just a comet, I’d say our data was very out of the norm for that across all viewers for that kind of, for that kind of target. Do you see humanity moving forward? Do you see a big shift? Did you, with that three eye Atlas Comet or whatever you want to call it, spaceship, whatever. Do you see, you know, a jump in evolution for humanity? Was it like that or did you see like an obstruction for humanity of kind of like an entrapment for humanity? Like what do you see? Like, could you say, could you go any further? My takeaway at the, at the very end, like I was trying to suss out like what does it mean? And I kept getting like an omen, a warning of things to come, like negative things to come.

So and that was kind of interesting because I know like historically comets and things in the sky were seen like to ancients as like a sign or omen. Like oh, this, this thing happened. We know that Something bad is going to happen. So that kind of was an interesting tie in. That was my sense of it by the end of it that this was like a forewarning of something bad to come with all this stuff that’s transpiring right now. Do you do see some big events to help, Is it going to help push humanity forward or do you see us? Because this comment kind of seems to me like this is a deep state manufactured event or an alien car they’re pulling out, completely manufactured.

Because I’ve been told that this is coming. Do you see it as that? Do you see it as being engineered or do you see it as natural outside of remote viewing? Aside from what I had in my session. To me, I just, I just think it’s kind of silly. I mean, to me, I mean, I’m not taking it away from anyone else. I just. That’s how you see the whole event. They’re kind of silly. No one’s gonna take it serious. I mean, I, I don’t really take it that serious. I know some people are very much looking at this and, and, and hooked on it.

I just. My interest in space stuff is just not that deep. So when I see like that they’re looking at a comet or something, I, to me I’m just like, okay, that’s kind of interesting, we’ll see what happens. But I know a lot of people are saying Project Bluebeam, you know, things along that line. The Werner von Braun, his warning about the fake alien invasion. I know a lot of people are talking about that. I’m very neutral, so I don’t like to jump to any conclusions on what it might be. But yeah, there’s a lot of interesting, different lines of thought around that.

I mean so many, I mean things are cyclical on this planet. You know, could it be, you know, what the Hopies talked about, you know, the Blue Star. There’s so many things that come to my mind and there’s been so many comments, comments that have come and gone. You got all the people that drink the Kool Aid and the Heaven’s Gate. I mean there’s so much with these things. I mean there’s no real way to tell in my opinion until it happens. But I was just trying to get like a, a reading from you. So there’s really nothing that’s concerning you with the remote viewing that you’ve done so far? Correct.

That’s for humanity. I, I mean, I’ve seen concerning things, but I think that we have the ability to change. You know, we have the ability to maneuver. And I don’t take what I get in remote viewing as the concrete 100% going to happen. A truth, you know what I mean? It’s. It could happen. Things that we’ve seen have happened. So I don’t discount it completely, But I try not to let it weigh me down, you know what I mean? I try not to say, okay, it’s over, like it’s gonna happen like this. I have a positive outlook overall.

Even with. Even with all the things that we’ve. We’ve gotten into. Do you think that, you know, when you put this out there into the quantum field and we just even talk about it, that we can change the direction, like even us talking about it right now changes everything? I think so, yeah. I think so. Because I think the idea of someone getting information from the future and disseminating it in the now, I think by default, right. Would have to change what happens in the future. I guess maybe There’s Lynn Buchanan. He’s a. He was a military remote viewer.

He has this thing on his website where he talks about future events and why some happen and some don’t and how they affect the present. And I think there’s just some events that do happen. Like some events are going to happen. You can’t change them. Whereas other ones are transient. Like, they may happen, they may not happen, depending on how the probabilities, you know, the direction of how things go. Whereas certain ones are like. They’re like a rock in the river. Like, they’re not. Right. They’re constant. You’re gonna bump up against them. Yeah. You’re gonna have to go around them.

So. Yeah, I try not to. And the Heaven’s Gate thing, I mean, that was, that was related to remote viewing. There were remote viewers that said, that’s a. A craft. So that’s why I say I’m, I’m, you know, I. I’m trying to be easy with the, with the comet thing. You know what I mean? It’s like, it’s just a remote viewing experiment. Interesting stuff. Don’t. Don’t base your life on it. What do you have to say to people? Like, I have a pretty big Christian audience. What do you have to say to people that they say stuff like, this is New Agey.

It’s. They’re channeling familiar spirits. This is all demonic. What do you have to say to those people? I mean, I guess I understand their point of view. Things we don’t understand are. Can be scary and, you know, causes to. To come up with different ways to explain it. But I’ve never channeled an entity. I’ve never done spirit communication. I’m not into any of that kind of stuff, really. Remote viewing is just the same thing that is like, oh, I have a bad feeling about something, or I had a dream. And it’s like. Some people might say that was God that gave them a vision.

Right. To see what was coming. So the way we interpret it, the way people interpret it is always different. To me, it’s a human. A natural communication skill that I’m using. I’m not communicating with any entity. I’m not. Anything I say, I’ll take full credibility for and say it was me who said it, and I’m willing to be wrong. I’m not saying I’m 100% right all the time. No remote viewer is 100. Right. We’re not omniscient or anything like that. It’s similar to, like a sports player. Right. Sometimes you go up, you hit a home run, sometimes you strike out.

That’s how. The same thing with remote viewing. Yeah. You could have a great moment. You could have great moments and. And see some things really clearly. Sometimes it’s vague. Sometimes it’s. It’s almost. It’s almost like roulette. I’d say it’s better chances than roulette. Like, you know, I’m very confident. Like, if you give me some targets, like I’m gonna hit, I’m gonna hit. Right. You know what I mean? But when it comes to the future, I’d say it gets more dicey when you’re trying to remove the future. You know, it’s the future. We don’t. There’s so many variables.

It’s more experimental, I’d say when. When we’re looking into the future, which is kind of exciting to me. Yeah. Do you think that maybe psychedelics could help or hinder this process? Have you guys experimented with that? I mean, I’ve always been curious about that. There’s a. A book and a documentary called the Sacred Mushroom that talks about a certain type of mushroom that enhances ESP or, you know, extrasensory perception. I’ve never done remote viewing on shrooms. Right. You know, I’ve never done it like that. I’ve done shrooms. I’ve done stuff like that. That might be a study worth looking into.

I don’t know. I mean, yeah, people are open to experiment. I think, personally, I think that remote viewing is probably best done. You got to be sharp. Like, you have to be sharp. You have to be able to catch things that are just below the surface of your awareness. You really don’t think you could be in an altered state of mind? You are, you’re in a, you’re in a subtle altered state of mind when you do remote viewing. Like, you know, like the daydream, you’re, you’re in a slightly meditative state. I don’t think you want to be hot, you know, completely high or completely trans doubt or anything like that.

It could, it’s like, it’s a very, it’s like a, it’s like a tight balance that you’re, that you’re walking when you, when you do remote viewing. That’s just my personal opinion on it. Yeah, I think you got to be sharp, you got to be attentive, you got to be able to catch things that most people would say, you know, I don’t know what you’re talking about. I, I didn’t, I didn’t hear anything. I didn’t see anything. I didn’t feel anything. The remote viewer has to be sensitive enough to pick up on, on that stuff. Yeah. You find that men or women are better at this, or does it not matter in gender? Well, most of the remote viewers I know are men, but there are women who do remote viewing and they’re, I mean, from what I’ve read, apparently women are more likely to be good at it.

I mean, I’ve taught. That’s kind of where my instinct goes with that. I would imagine they are. I’ve had women students that have done really amazing work right from the get go. Like, right from the beginning. They just have, you know, really, really good results. It all comes down like, for me, I was never, I would never consider myself a psychic or, or anything like that. So I, I just started practicing this stuff because I read about it. You know, I read about it, I said, is that real? Like, what, the government’s got guys psychic spying or something? Like, I, I imagine how would that be? Like, how does that work? And I read the, in the manual, it’s like what, these guys are sitting at a desk doing paperwork.

That’s how they do it. So I said, okay, let me see how this works. Let me try this. And when I tried it, after a short while I realized, like, okay, this is, there’s something to this. Like, I could see in my own work. Like, there’s no way I could have drawn that or could have known this. So from there I just started practicing and doing it on my own. And you teach people now on your Website or what is. It’s Future Forecasting Network. Right. So it’s. We, we just have a new website now. It’s ffgrrv.com.

yeah, ffgrv.com but yeah, that’s the Future Forecasting group. And yeah, I teach people now remote viewing, how to, you know, how to remote view. Do they just sign up for your classes or, or like you do like a zoom with them and you all do the targets right there or what? Yeah, we do. It’s a 10 week course and there’s six classes and we do them over zoom. So I’ll teach them a section, I’ll give them the homework. They, during the time in between the next class, they do the sessions, they send them to me, I tell them, you know, I give them guidance.

I say, okay, you know, here’s where you can do this, do that. And then by the end of it, they usually end up having some really, you know, undeniable experiences. A lot of them, you know, see like, okay, this thing works. Like, I saw this, I drew this, I knew this about something. And that was by all means impossible by what they know what, what should be possible. So it’s definitely something anyone can do. I really think it is something that anyone can do. Just depends on how much, you know, how much time and effort, how much time you want to put into it.

Like, like anything else? Just like anything else. Yeah. Yeah. Wow, man. Naim, I appreciate you coming on, folks. It’s FFGRV.com. i’ll put a link down there below for you and hopefully you get some students, man, this is pretty awesome. I, I’m compelled, so I’m intrigued. I’m intrigued and I might be compelled to even join. So I’ve always been curious about this stuff, man. We do like, we do the mystery stuff, we do the historical stuff, we do the future stuff. We also look at financial stuff, right? Gold, silver, cryptos. So, you know, we do a whole bunch of different things to try and give our subscribers, you know, as much information as possible so that they can make the right decisions.

Yeah, well, folks, get on it. Naim Vendreas, right? That’s how I said, I said, right, yeah. Awesome Butcher. Everyone’s last name, man. I appreciate you coming on aim folks. Get over there. Ffgrv.com folks. Ffgrv.com Naim, thank you so much for joining me. God bless you. Thanks for having me on.
[tr:tra].

See more of David Nino Rodriguez on their Public Channel and the MPN David Nino Rodriguez channel.