➡ Gallbladder attacks, often caused by eating fatty foods like fried chicken, can be managed by fasting and a no-fat diet, but this doesn’t dissolve the gallstones. A surgeon suggested that fasting and a no-fat diet can reduce attacks but won’t get rid of the stones. The author hypothesized that the body forms gallstones, which are made of cholesterol, as a way to store fat if not enough is consumed or if the wrong type is consumed. To test this, the author had patients with gallstones eat as much raw animal fat as they could tolerate, which surprisingly stopped the gallbladder attacks and dissolved the stones in some cases.

➡ The speaker discusses their skepticism towards the use of the drug Ozempic for managing rising glucose levels, suggesting it may cause more harm than good. They advocate for a more natural approach to health, including diet, exercise, and reducing exposure to harmful elements. They also question the existence and impact of Epstein Barr virus and herpes, arguing that there’s no concrete evidence linking these viruses to chronic conditions like fatigue syndrome. They emphasize that while symptoms are real, attributing them to a specific disease or virus is often unfounded.

➡ The text discusses the idea that chronic fatigue and other symptoms are not caused by specific viruses, but rather by a variety of factors that can affect a person’s energy levels. It suggests that these factors can range from physical to emotional, and that each person’s experience is unique. The text also challenges the concept of sexually transmitted diseases, proposing that symptoms may be the body’s way of eliminating toxins. Lastly, it touches on the topic of appendicitis, suggesting that it may not always require surgical intervention.

➡ The text discusses the role of the appendix in our bodies, suggesting it might act as a reservoir for beneficial gut bacteria. However, the author also questions the current understanding of the microbiome, suggesting it’s not fully understood and might change frequently. They also propose that the appendix might house primordial life forms that can transform into necessary bacteria or fungi, depending on the body’s needs. If the appendix is removed, this could potentially cause issues, although a diet rich in good animal fats and fermented foods might help.

Okay, welcome everybody. Today is another Wednesday webinar. Hopefully you can hear me okay. If not, I’m sure I will hear about it. And today is January 28, 2026. And again, thanks everybody for joining me. The only announcement I have is we still have spots available in the new biology experience at polyface in June. The link to how to sign up for that, it will be in the show notes and I think the. I’m pretty sure, in fact I’m positive that the early bird pricing is still available and we’re still planning on selling out. So if you want to come, it would be great to do it as soon as possible so you get the best price possible.

I, I thought another thing to say about this is for the past, you know, almost 25 years, maybe even 26, not sure anymore, I pretty much geared up my in person talk to the Weston Price foundation annual meeting, which usually happens in October or sometime in November. So I would use that opportunity to give a basically public talk and then there was often time for questions and that would be a sort of summary and a recounting of what I had learned in the previous year, what was new and what I was thinking about. And I would use that opportunity to sort of coalesce the important points that I had come to or thought about or learned or questions that I had from the previous year.

And I would essentially present that live to the public. Some of you may know this, but I actually am no longer affiliated with the Weston Price Foundation. I not the vice president anymore. And in fact I will not be going to at least this conference and probably not future conferences. Instead of that, I’m planning on using this yearly new biology experience gathering as the time that I do my in person public recap. So this, this one will be at polyface in Virginia. And like usually at the Weston Price conferences, I have some at least new or different things that I’m working on and I never know exactly what I’m going to present until we used to be the hour before or the day before, but now it’s, I have to do it maybe the week before.

So I make sure that my PowerPoint is be able to be prepared. Not that I do them, but that they, they get made. So, so I’m still working on it, collecting ideas, thinking what’s most important, what am I thinking about? What are the people who listen to me, what are they most interested in? And you know, we’re all in this process sort of together of unlearning and then trying to figure out what’s real, but mostly I would say unlearning. And so my question to myself is, what is the next thing we all need to unlearn? And maybe not all, but what’s the next thing I need to unlearn? And then I, I guess I trust, or maybe you could use the word hope that some of the other people would be interested in the same thing.

So again, that’s a long, roundabout way of saying this will be my yearly, hopefully public talk where I recap what I’ve been thinking about, what I’ve come to when, what I think the questions that we need to deal with or have dealt with the previous year. Where do we need to go with this? And instead of presenting them in October at the Weston Price conference, I will be presenting them in June. And I’m not sure if all the conferences will be at June, but at least this year at part of the new biology experience. So hopefully that gives people maybe another incentive or reason to come.

There are lots of other reasons besides that, meeting lots of friends and having good food and good time and learning, hopefully a lot, and getting to interact with all of your favorite new biology clinic practitioners. So there’s a whole lot of reasons to join us, and I hope everybody considers it okay with that. Let’s get to more of the questions. And you know, I, I will occasionally have things to present, things I hear about in the week that are not the big yearly questions, but things that come up during the week or during the month. So maybe I’ll do a short presentation.

But this way of doing questions and answers gets me to hear what it is that you’re interested in. And my hope is it isn’t just the person who asked the question, but that I can maybe generalize these so that they’re of interest to other people besides just the particular person who answered the question. So that’s my goal with these question and answers. And hopefully that’s meeting your needs. So the first one was how do you get rid of gallstones? And it’s interesting because I wrote a article on this for the Wise Traditions Journal, and there were talking probably 35, maybe even 40 years ago.

And the reason I wrote probably wasn’t 35, let’s say 25 to 30 years ago, because the Weston Price foundation has only been about 26 years, so maybe 25 years ago. And you might even be able to find that article somewhere. And the reason I wrote it is I had a string of three or four consecutive patients who had come to me with documented gallstones. And then I told them what to do, or I told them what I thought they should do. And then I think it was three or four in a row. All I was able to document that they no longer had stones.

And of course, they also no longer had the symptoms that they had. When they first came to me, the symptoms were usually pain with eating and sometimes nausea and a feeling of fullness. And so after telling them what to do and then rechecking in about six months, I think it was again, three or four consecutive people, no evidence of stones and no symptoms. So I thought I was really onto something. And so I wrote an article about. Turns out that that was not 100% effective. But I kept doing that pretty much most of my career. And I would say it was somewhere between 60 and 80% effective.

At least half, probably more of the people who had documented stones and symptoms ended up after doing what I’m about to tell you, no stones and no symptoms. Now, I’m not saying that’s the only way to do it, but this was the way that I did it. And I think it was true that it was the only people that I ever saw where I was 100% convinced that they had gallstones. And then after doing what I said they didn’t. And I didn’t see that with any of their other cleanses or gallbladder flushes or anything else that people were doing.

I’m not saying they never worked, but I never was able to document it. So, first of all, what are the symptoms? Usually people have some nausea and bloating, and particularly they have right upper quadrant of their abdomen. That’s the. If you just divide your abdomen into four quadrants, right upper quadrant, where you put your hand, your right hand over your liver. The gallbladder is under the liver. And the function of the gallbladder, the liver makes the bile, and it’s stored and concentrated in the gallbladder, a little pouch. And what we’re told is that when you eat fatty food, the gallbladder contracts and the bile flows out of the gallbladder into the small intestines and helps with the emulsification and digestion of the fats.

So that’s what we’re told. And I would say I have no particular reason to doubt that that’s actually what happens. There’s some more esoteric meaning behind the gallbladder, but I don’t think that’s relevant here, so I won’t get into that. So the. And what happens is that for. In conventional medicine, for unknown reasons, people start developing Stones in their gallbladder. In other words, instead of no stones, no little hard balls, your bile in your gallbladder, even though it’s concentrated, should be free flowing in a more or less liquid form. There shouldn’t be any little balls or little stones or little concretions in your gallbladder.

And the thinking is when the gallbladder contracts, if you push out a stone, then it gets stuck in the common bile duct, which is the duct leading out of the gallbladder into the intestines. And that causes spasm, pain, nausea, vomiting and bloating. So it’s a pretty straightforward sort of pathophysiological condition. And what was so important about it, from my thinking point of view, was this was one of the first cases or situations where I was able to successfully implement the thinking of why would the gallbladder do this? Or why would your body form stones in the gallbladder? Now I had the history of again, having been an ER doctor and I that’s where people who have, are having so called gallbladder attacks, which is they get a stone stuck and then they have horrible pain.

And sometimes you even get sort of, you know, buildup and a so called infection, which just means a blockage in the, in the butt, in the duct. And then sometimes they even allegedly needed emergency surgery. And so they would often come to the er. So I saw literally hundreds, maybe thousands of people having gallbladder attacks through the years. And I would send them to the surgeon because that’s who they took care of. The gallbladder attacks. We put them in the hospital, put them on pain medicine, and often that relaxed the duct, allowed the stone to flow and that would relieve the pain.

And then they would take their gallbladder out. And I remember running into a surgeon and, and interest. Before I say that one of the clues was a, and it was a little bit even of a joke in the er. One of the things that we all saw and knew in the ER is the number one food that provoked a gallbladder attack was fried chicken. So anytime you ate fried chicken and had stones, it would cause a huge contraction of the gallbladder, push the stones out into the duct, and then you would have a gallbladder attack. I remember asking this one surgeon about this, and I don’t know how it came up, but he said something interesting, which is 100% of gallbladder attacks can be managed by complete water fasting the patient.

In other words, Gallerson has a gallbladder attack caused allegedly by eating fatty food and then you tell them stop eating and only drink water. And that’s essentially what they did in the er. We put them on npo, nothing by mouth, and gave them an IV fluid and then the gallbladder attack would subside. And also we gave them pain medicines, but even without the pain medicines. And then I asked him and how many of the people who you put on a water fast for, he did it for 24 hours and then he would put them on a no fat diet so they wouldn’t provoke any attacks.

How many of them dissolve their stones and ended up not needing to have surgery. And he said 0%, that he had never seen anybody dissolve a stone and nor had he ever heard of that and he didn’t think that was possible. And so I ended up checking around and that was basically what I heard from all the other surgeons and doctors, that there is no documented evidence of a gallstones or a bunch of gallstones hanging out in your gallbladder. And then you do whatever, whatever it is that you’re doing, either fasting or anything and then documenting that you dissolve the stones.

So basically that told me that fasting in a no fat diet, while it certainly helped reduce the amount of attacks, it did not solve the problem, which is get rid of the stones. So I asked myself the question then and which is the same question I’m still asking myself now, why would the body form stones? And if it was because you’re eating say unhealthy fats or the wrong kind of fats, then I would think if you stopped eating any fats, which I saw literally hundreds of people do, then your body should stop making the stones, the stones should dissolve and you solve the problem.

And that never once happened. So, so I concluded that it wasn’t just eating, you know, like processed, toxic, you know, denatured, so called set, you know, like hydrogenated fats. Not to say those things are good, but that wasn’t the only reason for the problem. And then somehow it hit me that maybe, and this is the essence of the new biology thinking maybe, because another fact here is gallstones are cholesterol stones. In other words, if you take them out, take out somebody’s gallbladder and send the stones to a pathologist, they will tell you that the stones are made of fat, cholesterol.

So I thought as a hypothesis, may maybe the body is storing fat in the gallbladder because you’re either not eating enough fat or eating the wrong kind of fat. And so the body says, well I’m going to store fat because you’re not eating enough. And so at least I’ll have some fat, which is necessary for my health. And so at least I’ll have a sort of reservoir of fat. And that may sound goofy, but that was my thinking. Then I had to try it out. So I said, okay, all these people with documented stone, now how do I document it? With an ultrasound, which is a very simple test.

I wouldn’t say there’s no toxicity, but it’s not very toxic. It’s not like an X ray. And while I’m not saying that sound waves are completely harmless, that’s what we did. And you could clearly see the stones. And I wouldn’t say it’s 100% proof that you had stones, but pretty close. So we knew these people had stones, many stones. And I told them to eat as much fat as they could tolerate, because if the problem was they weren’t getting enough fat, they obviously had to eat more. But the caveat was the fat had to be animal fat and it had to be raw.

So no cooked animal fat, no plant oils, no plant fat, not even coconut oil, olive oil, canola oil, any other kind of oil for or fat from a plant. They could eat plant food, but not any added fat and as much raw animal fat as they could tolerate. Now, that was one of the most inconvenient diet strategies I know, because you couldn’t even eat meat, because then you would eating cooked animal fat. But so what you could eat is raw milk or raw kefir if you want to ferment it, which I think is better. You could eat raw cream.

You could eat sushi, which is like raw fish. And you could eat like steak tartare and just trim off the fat from, you know, steaks and any. Any other animal fat that you wanted, chickens, whatever, anything that you would eat raw. And if you were worried about it, you could freeze it first and then thaw it. And that made it a little bit easier to digest. You could put a little salt and pepper on it to make it taste better. And again, it was sort of the opposite of the fried chicken diet. And that’s what I told them to do.

And I warned them that it’s not easy to do this. So they could eat whatever good, organic, healthy, soaked, sprouted, you know, animal food, vegetables, fruit that they wanted. They could eat honey. And added to that was as much animal fat that was raw as they could tolerate. The first thing I saw with that was people totally ended up stopping their gallbladder attacks, which was weird because supposedly, if you eat any fat that will provoke an attack. But you could eat a bowl of cream and maybe you had to work up to a whole bowl with blueberries and raw honey and stuff like that in it, and you wouldn’t get an attack.

And you could eat raw meat and you could eat sushi and it wouldn’t get an attack. So that was the first benefit, is the attack stopped. And then I told them they had to do this for six months, which was not an easy diet. And in fact, that’s an understatement because it was one of the hardest diets I can imagine. And then, like I said, their ultrasound showed that the stones had dissolved. Now, in fairness, I did use three supplemental things during that six months. And these were all from standard process, and they’re called cola call, which is basically like bile salts and AF beta food, which is basically beet juice and beet powder, similar to what we carry on dcg.

And a third one was called disodium phosphate, which is basically like a detergent. So I had them basically, no, no other supplements, no vitamins, no gallbladder flushes, no cleansing, no nothing like that. Just strictly this diet. Plant food is okay, but not added fat from. From plants. Raw animal fat as much as they could tolerate, but only raw. So it’s the opposite of the fried chicken diet. Do these three supplements? Call me in six months, do an ultrasound. The first three people I did that, they all dissolved their stones, which I had never seen. And then like I said, 60 or so percent of the people after that, they almost all got symptomatic relief.

So in other words, they didn’t have gallbladder attacks, but not everybody dissolved their stone. Now, somebody asked me about it, this Andreas Moritz’s gallbladder cleanse and liver detox. And so I’ve never seen that. I’ve never used that. I took a quick look and there’s a lot of that that I don’t like and a lot of sort of pseudo scientific jargon. And I can appreciate doing the apple juice and olive oil and sort of flushing the gallbladder out. But my thought on that, because I saw a lot of people do it and they even came to me showing me their stones, but every single one of them that I saw still had stones in their gallbladder.

And so I even wonder whether these things that they were calling stones, which were sort of green little pellets, were actually congealed olive oil. And I’m not sure about that, but that was possible. I know Kelly on the Kelly diet Used to use a liver gallbladder flush. So I’m not saying I’m against it, but this was the thing that worked for me. And I literally never was able to see with my own eyes with an ultrasound documenting that stones would go away any other way but this. And even though it wasn’t 100%, this is what I continue to use throughout my whole career.

And I liked it. Okay, I think that’s pretty much all about that. Next question was, I think about somebody in their family. The doctor put this person on Ozempic for elevating rising glucose and they were wondering if this is a good idea. And I don’t remember the whole question. I think there was some parts of it that had sort of a bad outcome. And I think the answer should be pretty obvious that I actually don’t think that’s a good idea for a couple reasons. Even though I’m no expert on Ozempic or that category of drugs, and I’m such a, such a non expert on it that I don’t even know that I could come up with the category of drug that it think that supposedly is.

There’s supposedly some enzyme inhibitor or some gene that it inhibits. So basically all of that is pseudoscience. I think what they’re doing is basically poisoning people’s digestive function with some sort of poison they came up with which makes you feel like not eating. And then you can lose weight and then you can, your sugar may lower as a result of that. And then you will go on to have more problems than you ever could imagine as a result of having your GI tract and probably your liver and gallbladder poisoned. And you will not escape from that scot free.

So personally, I would never take that drug. I would never have prescribed it. Just like I never prescribed any psychiatric drugs in my entire career. Not one. I never prescribed a statin drug, not one. I pretty much never prescribed any diabetes drugs because diabetes is incredibly simple to fix. In almost all cases. It is a true disease of civilization, meaning people who eat bad food, processed food, unnatural food, food that’s not grown in their environment, not grown in a good way, mixed with all sorts of things. They don’t move like humans supposed to move. They don’t get out in the sun, they don’t ground to the earth, they’re exposed to toxic electromagnetic fields, they have stressful, toxic lives.

They get vaccines, they take pharmaceutical drugs. And of course not every single person with elevated blood sugar. But, but there’s always some mixture of emotional, psychological, metabolic, nutritional movement component in there. And so you go about fixing those and throw a little bit of some sort of fasting, either 24 hour fasting or intermittent fasting, sometimes mixed in with a few days or even a week of just plain water fasting. You limit the carbohydrate intake, but not to zero, or you don’t need to do a ketogenic diet. It’s basically good animal fats, good animal foods, you know, fermented vegetables, a little bit of fruit, raw honey and movement and sun and earthing and working on the psychological emotional blocks in your life or where things haven’t gone right, and working on the EMF exposure.

And that is enough to help people regain their normal weight and stop almost all the diabetics from being diabetics. And it often happens in a really quick time, like six to 12 weeks. Anybody at the new biology clinic can help you with this. There’s no reason anybody should even think about taking any of that category of medicine like Ozempic for so called rising blood sugar or obesity. All of this is very fixable with much safer approaches. Okay, what about Epstein Barr virus? The person asks. So again, you know, I keep going over this, but the, the question that you want to ask yourself with this is in the same question I keep going over.

And it’s all. It’s hard for all of us to really sort of wrap our thinking around this is what did you see? Not what did you think in your mind or what you were told, or what your doctor said, or what the newspaper said, or what studies say. What is it that you’re seeing and what is it that you’re trying to get better? So I think what this person meant, there’s, you know, or you could also put this in the category of herpes and Epstein Barr virus. So they’re talking about Epstein Barr virus as the cause of so called chronic fatigue syndrome.

Now the Epstein Barr virus has also been implicated in things like Ms. And some, also some cancerous situations. And I remember a guy used to know named Jesse Stoff, who was at that time an anthroposophical doctor who was one of the pioneers in claiming that Epstein Barr virus was the cause of what was then called chronic fatigue syndrome, which has gone through a lot of metamorphoses. And then it was called fibromyalgia, and then it was more recently called long Covid. And it’s basically the situation of a person who starts out with an acute illness, like what we call the flu, and then goes on to be weak and tired.

And sick a lot of the time, meaning mucus and cough and run down and not feeling well. And then it can progress to more profound fatigue and difficulty concentrating and a pretty significant disability in their life. So the first thing is, nobody is saying that those experiences that people have, meaning an acute symptoms like flu or going on to be chronically or long term fatigued and disabled and not able to work and getting sick a lot and not being able to think properly, nobody is arguing that those things don’t occur. The same with a related so called virus, herpes.

Nobody is saying that people don’t have blisters on their genitals. Right there, there are things you can see and things you can experience and things that people say to you, which is their experience of life. Like 37 days of the year I had a cold, like symptoms and mucus and cough, etc. And then the rest of the days I was tired and really didn’t feel like going to work. And if I walked too much, my muscles ached and if you press me right here, then it really hurt. So there was these trigger spots. So I got fibromyalgia, et cetera.

Nobody is saying that those are not real experiences that people have. Of course there is room for people not making them up. I would sort of never claim that, but maybe exaggerating or misconceiving what their experience, we all have that possibility in our life. But more or less, I would say those are facts, those are felt experiences as are the blisters on your genitals. Now then we get into, so it’s not that there isn’t symptoms. So no, the, the claim should not be, well, that those things aren’t real. That the, the problem is, first of all they’re not a specific disease.

Nobody can define what that disease is. There’s no defining blood tests, there’s no pathognomonic hallmark symptom, there’s no sign, there’s nothing anybody examining you can look at and say, yes, you’ve got chronic fatigue or fibromyalgia or long Covid or anything. There’s no blood test, there’s no symptoms. There’s no physical exam signs. There’s nothing they, they hide behind the moniker of, well, it’s your clinical judgment, whatever that means. It means you can make it up. And so if your judgment is poor or good based on nothing, you make it up a lot of the time or a little of the time or whatever.

Again, I didn’t say you don’t have those symptoms. I said that’s Not a specific disease. So that’s the first problem. The second is the claim that these particular symptoms, which is not a syndrome, a not a specific entity, are caused by a virus that is called Epstein Barr virus. Now, I’m not going to go into the whole virus story yet again, but I can assure you, having looked in the medical literature, nobody has ever found an Epstein Barr virus in any biological fluid of any person who is allegedly chronically fatigued. And nobody has found a herpes virus in any biological fluid of anybody who’s having genital lesions or eruptions on their genitals.

And if you disagree with that, you’re going to have to show me the study. And the NIH and the CDC have already said over and over again, there is no paper that demonstrates that that is simply a fact. And then the way that they demonstrate that this is caused by an Epstein Barr virus, in other words, isolation and then of the virus is basically a scientific joke. And we’ve been over that again a million times. That’s an exaggeration. But we’ve gone over it a number of times. And there is no isolation of the virus. There is no evidence that any of these viruses exist.

There’s no evidence that any so called sexually transmitted disease is contagious. And I’ll say more about that in a minute. There’s no evidence that anybody gets chronic fatigue from somebody with mono, which is supposedly the acute phase of chronic fatigue caused also by an Epstein Barr virus. A mono spot is an antibody test using a nonspecific antibody that has never been validated to react only to a virus which has never been found. So there is no Epstein Barr virus. So there is no possibility of an Epstein Barr virus causing a disease which doesn’t even exist itself.

So we’re back to the person has symptoms. Why do they have symptoms? The person has chronic fatigue and all the other things I said, or genital lesions and maybe pain, et cetera. Why do they have that? And all I can say is there is always a individual story. And there’s literally no possibility of saying the cause for everybody’s problem who’s chronic fatigued, chronically fatigued is X. All you can say is there’s some problem with their ability to generate energy. And since we know that we’re some sort of a battery and the battery has to do with water, and the water is charged and has minerals in it and charged in the sun, etc.

So we already have some clues as to how a living being generates energy. But then there are, you know, a Huge number of possible ways that this, this energy deficit has occurred. And that could be poisons, it could be starvation, could be vaccines, pharmaceutical, emotional, psychological trauma, you name it. And that’s where the whole new biology approach is. What happened to you? Throw out all these disproven theories about chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia and long Covid and Epstein Barr and herpes virus, et cetera, all that scientific nonsense. What happened to you? What’s the story? Stick with what you can see, with what happened to you in your life, what you’re thinking about, and let the person, the person knows what happened to them.

It’s just that it’s our job as practitioners to somehow draw that story out. And that’s usually simply done by conveying that you’ll listen. And we’re here to hear your intuition speak, and it usually does. And that will lead to a usually quick and resolution of the symptoms. Now, I just want to say one other thing about this whole thing with sexually transmitted disease, partly because we had questions about this and it came up in our new biology clinic meeting. The first thing I’ll say is for those of you who want to look into the, quote, science of our.

Is there such a thing as a sexually transmitted disease that’s contagious through microbial contact? Well, the contact is a sexual contact. And what’s transmitted between one partner and the next is a microorganism, which is the cause of the disease. And I would say the best place to look at that is the virus viroligy website. Mike Stone, who’s done a number of pieces on particularly syphilis and the fact that that is not a contagious disease. And the Baileys have also done things on herpes and et cetera. So we do know there’s no virus. Bacteria don’t cause disease.

This is not a microbial sexually transmitted disease. But there, interestingly are people, and probably a fair number of them, who will say, I never had lesions on my genitals and then I had sexual contact with somebody who had lesions on their genitals and tested positive for herpes, and then I got them afterwards. And how do we explain that? So, first of all, some of those probably aren’t true, but let’s just say for the sake of this discussion that that is true. So what do we know about this? And again, we use our principle. What did you actually see? As opposed to theories about viruses and certain specific diseases and antibodies, et cetera, what you saw was a person with a painful elimination of toxic material on Their genitals.

That’s what you see with a person with syphilis, gonorrhea or herpes. They have a discharge from their generals genital organs or a discharge on their genitals. It’s usually painful and it’s usually sort of somewhat putrid material, meaning it smells and it’s irritating. And so you can make the tentative conclusion that the person with those with that experience is somehow eliminating something through their genital organs. Now, a hallmark of that is pain. And interestingly you could say, so why does the body do that? And one possible answer is, well, they’re trying to sort of cleanse the genital organs and telling you through this pain, this is not the time to have sexual activity.

In other words, first clean your sexual organ area and then once things are all better, then hopefully you can be in a stable relationship and then resume sexual activity and maybe even go on to have a child. But if you override that, and interestingly, if the person you’re going to have sexual contact with over, you know, sees that and has the experience, which is inevitable, that this is probably not the time to have a sexual contact with this person because they have an oozing sore which is painful. And so I’m going to be have to protect myself even though I’m going into this very intimate act.

So there’s already a conflict built into this experience. And so then you have contact with the toxins that are being eliminated. And in syphilis, interestingly, sometimes it was even historically the mercury that the person was treated with. And so that itself can cause lesions on the partner’s genitals who’s in contact with. And then you have this energetic exchange in a conflicted situation because there’s often some emotional or aspects of this or some parts of this experience that are not in your say, normal usual sexual encounters or sexual relationship. So there’s all kinds of conflicts, emotionally, psychologically toxic physically around this event.

And so it shouldn’t be surprising if the next person has a similar eruption. And that certainly makes sense to me. And when you talk to the people who’ve had this experience, in my experience, pretty much everybody had some reservations, misgivings, conflict around whether this was the right thing to do. And for the person who had a sexual encounter with a painful genital lesion, it definitely did not feel like the right thing to do. And that also changes the whole dynamics. So we have a sexual dynamic that’s clearly not optimal, and that’s an understatement. So all those things I think are Reasonable ways of looking at it, hypotheses to think about when you’re encountering this situation.

And you know, I had a story about this which I think encapsulates this whole picture because in the early part of the COVID years and I was went to do a in person sort of live talk in Q and A in a neighboring town and there was 60 or so people and I gave the talk that there was no such thing as a virus or what’s accurate to say, nobody has ever demonstrated the existence of a virus. And I included HIV and therefore said like all the other so called syndromes, there is no evidence that AIDS is a specific disease and there’s no evidence for the existence of hiv.

And so there’s no way HIV could be the cause of this illness, which isn’t even a specific illness. And interestingly, one of the questions I got from that, which I think demonstrates what I’m saying is somebody from the audience asked me, well, you can say this, but are you. Would you be willing to have anal sex with a 90 pound guy with kaposi sarcoma, black lesions all over them, who’s basically dying in end stage of aids? And I thought of that and, and I had to admit he had a point because I must admit I would not be interested in having anal sex with that particular person, nor as far as I could see with anal sex with anybody.

In fact, being happily married, I’m not interested in having sex with anybody else but my wife. And so you can see that there are so many other reasons besides that you can come to besides that there was a viral reason, there’s no virus. And still I came to the same conclusion that this is not something I want to do. And so you can come to that same conclusion with herpes or any other encounter with anybody with syphilis and gonorrhea, etc. This is not what my deepest yearning wants to do. And this is an experience that really comes out of that.

It’s the most intimate thing that we do. And so you can easily come to the conclusion no, whether you know anything about viruses or not, this is not where I’m going with this. Okay, that’s enough of that. What do you do after an appendectomy? So the first thing I’ll say about that is we just had yet another case and I’m not sure how many we’re up to now in the new biology clinic and the people that we work with of a pretty well documented case of, of what they would call appendicitis and again, there is no firm documentation.

It was one of those clinical judgment. And so the excuse that I probably would hear is right, but the person probably didn’t have appendicitis. But I can tell you that in all these four or five cases that we now have, they absolutely would have taken this person’s. Some of them were children, some of them were adults, they diagnosed with appendicitis, they would have taken their appendix out. They had all the hallmark signs and symptoms, blood tests, everything that showed that they had what they call appendicitis. Any surgeon in the United States that I know of absolutely would have taken their appendix out.

And yet none of them had their appendix out. And they’re not only alive and well, but thriving and actually are better off, they say, having gone through this than they were before. So that’s the first thing I would say about that. Now, the second thing is, so if you didn’t get that message and went ahead and had your appendix out, and I’m not exactly saying that nobody needs an appendix appendectomy, which means take your appendix out. I have a suspicion that’s probably the case. But I can’t say that for sure because we don’t have enough cases in history to say that, but that would be my guess.

But again, I don’t know that. So everybody’s going to have to use their own judgment and maybe get our help with sorting this out. So the problem then, so you take the appendix out and now you have a problem of the drugs and the anesthesia, and then they wash it out with antibiotics, otherwise known as anti life drugs, and then they give you IV antibiotics and they usually give you some oral ones after. And then you have this big scar, or at least some scar usually. Now they do it through a smaller scar and a scope instead of an open incision.

And so now you’ve got a lot of problems. But also one of the problems seems to be the current theory of what an appendix does. It’s a bit like a reservoir for all the normal microbes that live in your gut. Now, interestingly, just yesterday we had a conversation and one of our doctors pointed out that there’s a lot of misconceptions and fallacies with this whole concept of microbiome. So in other words, let’s go back. The appendix is like, it’s like Noah’s Ark in a way. So your intestine has elephants and zebras and giraffes, et cetera. And so the appendix is like Noah’s Ark.

So there’s two zebras and two giraffes, and. And so all the different organisms that are meant to live in your gut, they keep like a seed bank or a Noah’s ark in your appendix, so that when you run out of the beneficial E. Coli, then you recruit them from the appendix and you can reseed the area. So that’s what we were told, if anything, about what an appendix does. Otherwise, we were told it’s a vestigial, useless organism which has no function, which I doubt. What I heard yesterday was that if you actually do samples of somebody’s intestines and different sites of the intestine, you get a totally different type of microbiome.

So in other words, all this testing and people who go banging on about your microbiome is such and such, and you should have this, or this is a normal one. All that is basically pseudoscience. We have no idea what a normal microbiome is. We have no idea what’s supposed to be living in your intestine or whether it’s different in all the different areas and whether it changes from minute to minute or hour to hour or day to day or week to week or month to month, or how often and why, et cetera. All that is a simply a mystery.

And. And the best I can figure is we have these primordial precursor like bions, they’re called by William Wilhelm Reich and microzyma by Baychamp, which are the precursors of all life, including bacteria and fungus and probably including us, and depending on the situation, which means the environment that they’re found in, which means the nutritional and probably emotional and probably electromagnetic environment and probably other things which I don’t even know about. They will form into whatever species of bacteria or species of fungus or species of parasites or species of you. There’s only one you. But whatever is needed, these precursors will form into that because that’s the basic primordial function of these symbiotes, these bions, these microzyma.

And that’s really how life comes about, not by anything else. So my suspicion is all that stuff about the appendix, what it really boils down to is maybe it’s a reservoir or a safe haven for these microzyma, and that if you take it out, you lose this somewhat of these primordial. Cells, so to speak, or units is probably a better word. They’re like what we think of as sort of like stem cells, except they’re not cells, their primordial life forms. And so you lose some of that, and that will make you less able to form what you need, maybe even for the rest of your life, or at least for a while.

And so that’s why there are problems that happen to people after appendicitis. Sorry, after. After appendectomy. And what would I do about that? You know, I’m not so sure except eat, you know, good nourishing traditions diet and lots of good animal fats and good foods and fermented stuff. There’s some interesting work that Christopher Gardner has done that been able to show that in biochar that you can. You get high concentrations of these microzymates. So they seem to live all over the place in nature and they’re sort of ubiquitous in nature. And so there may be certain foods.

Maybe shilajit is a high concentration of microzyma. There may be other forms. I’m not sure that I would eat biochar, but maybe some sort of charcoal or there may be certain foods. I would certainly try the raw fat thing, especially raw butter and raw cream and see how that goes. But most people do fine enough with a little bit of. I’m not quite the same as I was before the appendectomy. I think that’s pretty much all I have time for today. So I think I’m going to stop there and keep sending me the questions so I get to know what you’re interested in.

And again, check out the new biology experience. And again, that will be the, hopefully the yearly venue that I tell people in person what I’ve been thinking about in this previous year and you’ll get to ask me questions directly. Okay. I hope everybody has a great week and I will see you next week. It.
[tr:tra].

See more of DrTomCowan on their Public Channel and the MPN DrTomCowan channel.