Tom Fitton, because on top of everything else going to this weekend, I just don’t even understand the timing of this. Although I think we can make, we can speculate, but I want to go to you for facts. You are really, I never thought I’d say this, Tom, but you were our Justice Department during the Obama years. You were on Breitbart radio with me all the time, almost every day. We put lead stories up of what you guys were doing. I made a film about you guys. I made a film that actually starred you and your team, a district of corruption that I’m very proud of that really went to the heart of what you guys do.

And now, and people are so close to Pam and, you know, Cash was a co-host here, right? And I made the film about Cash. I made the film about Tom Fitton, district of corruption. I made government gangsters off of the book, Government Gangsters. Why did I make it off Government Gangsters? Because just like Tom Fitton, who was like Eliot Ness, Cash Patel was like Eliot Ness and he named names and he had facts and he backed it up. And guess what? Nobody sued us, right? Because it was all facts. And of course, Dan Bongino is one of the greats in our movement.

So Fenton, please explain to our audience what in the hell happened. What is this thing that came out last night, sir? I don’t know. I read the memo three or four times again this morning. And it’s really, I don’t think even the Biden administration would have written anything like this. I just don’t think they could have thought they could get away with it. And I got to wonder what is going on at the leadership of the Justice Department and the FBI to allow them to think that statements like as follows.

This is a classic. Of course, we’re suing for this stuff, right? And so they say the systematic review revealed no incriminating client list. So there’s a client list, but it’s not incriminating, so therefore you can’t see it. There is also no credible evidence that found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. Well, give us the incredible evidence. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. So they uncovered evidence, but it wasn’t enough to predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. So you can go line by line and go through this analysis that I’m going through.

It may be unfair or overly critical, but in my view, unless you have the records that back up the conclusions you’ve drawn in a case such as this, this isn’t worth much. And it’s disturbing. It was leaked to Axios. Second time there’s been a leak to Axios, by the way, by this Justice Department and FBI. Remember, we sued for the Biden videotapes of his interview with her. We were in court, literally in federal court. They’re stonewalling us. And then what did they do? They give it to Axios. Here they give it to Axios.

And this memo, by the way, it kind of drips with contempt for people like you, Bannon, for judicial watch. For anyone asking a question, give us the document. Judicial what? No, listen, I’d love Mark Caputo. We’ve had him on the show. We’re going to have him on the show again because they leaked to him the Kennedy, the massive CIA leak, and John Solomon the best. So you got, you got Fitton, you got Bannon, you got Solomon. They got, so hang on. So I have no problem with Mike Allen in Axios. It is the consensus thinking of the apparatus, okay? Also, some people at the White House are quite close to these people.

So this was a well-thought-through leak to a super prominent, particularly late at night, more than drudge. Everybody will read Axios on a Sunday night before you go. This is exclusive. But I just want for the audience to be very specific. Judicial Watch and Tom Fitton are suing DOJ. I think the FBI, what are you suing about? Why is your suit so important to this? And this is kind of a response to your suit, brother. Well, we saw the kind of this cluster with the release of the documents to the social media people, right? Many of whom are friends of ours, which is fine.

But then they said, well, there were materials that were withheld by the FBI. So give us all the Epstein records. We want the death records. We want the stuff about what the FBI withheld. Talk to us about how that happened and give us the records quite broadly. And instead, it’s been radio silence. It’s been three months of no records. We haven’t even gotten the file they leaked to the social media influencers. And in court the other day, I think I tweeted it out. I think they used the phrase exceptional circumstances. I guess the exceptional circumstances was they were writing a memo for Axios.

So the court hasn’t been told any of this. They’ve made the conclusion that we’ll get no more documents, it looks like, or a good number of documents will be withheld. And what’s good about the lawsuit is that everything that they’re saying here, they’re going to have to justify in court in no small measure. What records are you withholding? Oh, they’re under seal? Let’s talk about that. Let’s describe what type of records are under seal, what records can’t be disclosed because they’re under seal, et cetera. Whose privacy would be violated if records were released? All the excuses they’re making here, they’re going to have to bolster in court.

And memo or no memo, our lawsuit’s continuing. But why have they not just very similar? By the way, Pam Bondi, we’ve covered wall to wall. I’ve known her for years. I consider her a friend. We’re a huge supporter when Gates dropped out. She was kind of next man. President Trump honored her. Fine. Cash goes without saying a co-host, almost like a brother to us. Dan Bondi, one of the heroes of our movement. So this is not personal. But why has, just because this is not my line of country also, why has DOJ not just done one basic thing and gone to the courts and say, and say, we want to unseal all the records associated with Epstein.

So the American people can see it and then release those. This is supposed to be about the most transparent administration ever. Why has that not been, why has that not even happened? Why are they fighting that? Because they’re not going to be perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein. And no further disclosure will be appropriate or warranted. That’s what they’re telling the American people. All of the concerns you have about Epstein, they’re all unfounded. And how are they, why are they unfounded? Because we reviewed the evidence we’re not going to give to you and concluded that there’s no there there.

And there may be no there there, but show us the records. And this just, again, shows contempt for the people’s right to know. I’ve said it once, I’ve said it before, the Justice Department and the FBI are irredeemably compromised and corrupted. The leadership needs to understand that and act accordingly. I mean, the FBI moving to another building, that’s nice. I tell you what, we’ve got three extra offices, maybe two extra offices at Judicial Watch. We can lend them. That’s all they should need. That’s all they should have. That’s all they know. That’s all they need.

He shuts down the agency and he’s the only one there with a guy there to check his email. Amen. Okay. Hang on one second. We’re gonna break, come right back. Philip Patrick and Rio, but I gotta keep fitting. Tom Fitton, you’re gonna fight the goods. What is your action plan on this one? Because you’ve been on this like a dog on a bone and Fitton does not let the bone go. What is your action plan? Are you gonna tell this audience? Well, the lawsuit’s gonna continue for the Epstein records. It’s simple.

There’s a federal FOIA lawsuit. They’ve got to start producing records to Judicial Watch or explaining to the court what records, specifically their withholding and why. You know, what was really incredible was we asked for records that Pam Bondi had about the Epstein matter and they came back and said that she had nothing. She talked about having all these records on her desk and then they come back and tell us they had nothing. So this has got to proceed and it kind of goes back to our earlier idea. The president should recognize that Justice Department is an agency that thinks it’s above the law and outside the constraints of the Constitution in terms of checks and balances.

Does it mean that Pam Bondi thinks that? No, but that’s the culture of the Justice Department. It’s a culture in many ways of the FBI. They don’t even think they are run by the Justice Department. It’s just, I mean, it’s independent agency on top of independent agency, which is an abomination under our republic. And I think the president should just set up his own investigative unit, his own prosecutorial unit, his own special counsel as the chief magistrate and investigate everything that he thinks needs to be investigated. And he needs to start calling the Justice Department in the meantime.

Why haven’t you prosecuted Garland? I’m directing you to prosecute Garland. I’m directing you to prosecute Comey for trying to get me killed. I am ordering you to do so. If you don’t, I will find someone who will prosecute him or I’ll do it myself. The special prosecutor has to be appointed on his article to powers, has to be appointed by the president and has to report to the office of the president, not to Pam Bondi. That’s what we’re demanding on the 2020 election. But there’s a whole raft of stuff that the Justice Department FBI can’t go because you have a couple of people over there hanging on by their fingertips and we have to take these apparatuses down.

Where do people get you on social media? I mean, Epstein was under the watch of the Justice Department when he died. Why are they investigating it? Or if they said they – and by the way, if they came out and said there’s no – the evidence things of a suicide, put the evidence out. Let’s see what Bill Barr and those guys did. Let’s show the receipts. The Warren Posse wants the receipts. They want receipts. The evidence is the family had an alternative autopsy done that indicated murder and homicide, not suicide. Did they analyze that autopsy? Or was it Dr.

Baden? We want the records. And there’s a process for releasing them, and they’re not above the law, and they need to follow for you. Tom, where do they go on social media and where do they go on Judicial Watch to find you, all your material information? JudicialWatch.org, Twitter, Rumble, YouTube, Get Truth, you name it, we’re all over. We are the biggest movement in the conservative side of the aisle for transparency and accountability. We’re not the sleeping giant. You’re an action center. You’re a giant. You’re a beast. You’re a beast, but you’re taking action.

There’s no theoretical – he ain’t doing white papers. He’s not having conferences to talk about things. Fitton and that team are on it. They’ve been, since the time I met him, 10, 12 years ago during Obama’s regime. He was all over him, every day filing something. He was the people we call it, the People’s Justice Department. I guess you’re back to that, bro. I guess we’re the people. You never stop. You’re MAGA’s Justice Department. Unbelievable. And President Trump, I think – and President Trump needs to hear this. I hope you have a direct phone call with him today, Tom, because I know he really thinks so highly of you and your actions.

We got to bounce, brother. I’ll talk to you after the show. We’ll figure this out. This got to be like Article 3. We do with Davis. We got to do a War Room Judicial Watch partnership here to drive this. Tom Fitton, what a good man. [tr:trw].

See more of Judicial Watch on their Public Channel and the MPN Judicial Watch channel.