📰 Stay Informed with My Patriots Network!
💥 Subscribe to the Newsletter Today: MyPatriotsNetwork.com/Newsletter
🌟 Join Our Patriot Movements!
🤝 Connect with Patriots for FREE: PatriotsClub.com
🚔 Support Constitutional Sheriffs: Learn More at CSPOA.org
❤️ Support My Patriots Network by Supporting Our Sponsors
🚀 Reclaim Your Health: Visit iWantMyHealthBack.com
🛡️ Protect Against 5G & EMF Radiation: Learn More at BodyAlign.com
🔒 Secure Your Assets with Precious Metals: Get Your Free Kit at BestSilverGold.com
💡 Boost Your Business with AI: Start Now at MastermindWebinars.com
🔔 Follow My Patriots Network Everywhere
🎙️ Sovereign Radio: SovereignRadio.com/MPN
🎥 Rumble: Rumble.com/c/MyPatriotsNetwork
▶️ YouTube: Youtube.com/@MyPatriotsNetwork
📘 Facebook: Facebook.com/MyPatriotsNetwork
📸 Instagram: Instagram.com/My.Patriots.Network
✖️ X (formerly Twitter): X.com/MyPatriots1776
📩 Telegram: t.me/MyPatriotsNetwork
🗣️ Truth Social: TruthSocial.com/@MyPatriotsNetwork
Summary
Transcript
Hey friends, Peggy Hall back with you from the HealthyAmerican.org. You’re looking here at Marty McCarrie. He’s being interviewed on CBS News, where he very clearly stated that he wants to see an increase in vaccination rates. In fact, that’s why he wants to have other options to the mRNA because people apparently are afraid of taking the mRNA vaccine. I wonder why. But the reason why he wants other options is not to reduce the amount of jabs that people get, but to actually increase that. Let’s take a listen. What role did your special assistant, Tracy Beth Holm, play in that process? Well, first of all, Major, good to be with you.
And yes, you’re right. I have been enthusiastic about non mRNA COVID vaccines. To help with people who have a tough time with taking mRNA vaccines, I felt that it could increase vaccination rates. Did you hear that everybody? The last study that we have showing that it has a clinical benefit was from 2020 and 2021, and it excluded people with prior COVID infection. Now, essentially, everyone has natural immunity. Why didn’t we have natural immunity previously? Now, I don’t know about you, but I’m not a human pincushion. And I’ve never had so much as a sniffle, just saying.
So it’s my general feeling, not with this particular product, which I can’t discuss in depth, but with drugs in general, that we need to know if they work today in order to be able to recommend them. So we are asking some companies in general to do clinical studies, a basic clinical study, so we can educate the population and have information to work with. Should a 12 year old healthy girl. Wait a minute, a 12 year old thin, healthy girl. I don’t understand why the age and the size of the child matters.
So you’re telling me that overweight, sick children should get this. That’s what he’s saying. Get a seventh COVID shot this year. I don’t know the answer to that because we don’t have good clinical data. We can get that data. So what do you think, friends, they’re going to get the data and tell us, guess what, we have the data. And now the 12 year old thin girl should go ahead and get her seventh or eighth booster. There are some other concerning comments that it seems like people are missing. Let’s take a look over here at this interview with Charlie Kirk.
And I, I’m not going to play it for you, but I will read you this transcript here. And I actually made a larger screen here. Charlie says, will the COVID shot, shots remain on the child vaccination schedule? And Marty McCarrie says, I’d love to see the evidence to show that giving young, healthy children another cootie shot would help them. But that evidence does not exist. So we’re not going to rubber stamp things at the FDA. Friends, we need to break this down very carefully. First of all, he’s saying he would love to see more children becoming human pin cushions.
He just said that I would love to see the evidence to show. Now this also troubles me that giving young, healthy children. So older, unhealthy children should get it. Why are you giving these qualifiers? And how do you define young? And how do you define healthy? And why should just the young, healthy children wait for it, not get another shot. So he was fine with the initial shot. It’s the other shots. It’s the boosters that now he is talking about. So that’s very strange to me. So when you look at the entire statement, I’d love to see the evidence to show that giving young, healthy children another cootie shot would help them.
But that evidence does not exist. So we’re not going to rubber stamp things at the FDA. I don’t think you’re going to see a push at the CDC to be pushing cooties, cocktails in young, healthy children. So that means there will be a push for the not young, unhealthy children. Otherwise leave out the qualifiers and just say children or children between the ages of birth and 18 years old, because then they have a choice after that. Well, we all have a choice, but they are putting this on the schedule that many states are following in order for those children to go to school, which I’m not in favor of government schools anyway.
He goes on to say that’s something that’s being discussed right now. I think you’re going to see some announcement on that in the coming weeks. But I know they are trying to review all the scientific data. Friends, they are using AI to review the scientific data. I probably will do a second video for you on that tomorrow, where there is an interview with two of the top researchers in the FDA. And they’re talking about how awesome it is that AI is going to be reviewing the data for these drugs. Let me know what you think about them apples.
He goes on to say, and guess what, there’s no data. There’s no good randomized control data that the current version, the latest formulation of the cooties cocktail is necessary for young, healthy children. I don’t care for this phrase. Why do we keep hearing it? He’s not the only one that uses it. All of those use that Bob and the other guy big tree and the others. Why are they talking about young, healthy children? Why not just children or why not just people? Then he says other countries have already recommended against it.
Other leading countries in Europe have recommended against this for young, healthy children. Okay, that’s really troubling me. Now, he stated, as you heard that he wants to increase these vaccination rates, and he also wants to restore trust in the system. Let’s take a look at exactly who this fellow is. So he was from Johns Hopkins. That was his background. And of course, Johns Hopkins was the one that did all of the flu mongering, the fear mongering Johns Hopkins is the one that came out with this nonstop 24 seven dashboard to show all of the cases.
And of course, you and I know how they came up with those cases. Sounds like a bunch of hogwash to me the way they did that. And we know that that had absolutely nothing to do with the deaths. We know that many of those had to do with what happened at the hospitals. Here is Johns Hopkins. And this was a couple of years ago, they were talking again, about all of the test positivity. Yes, that means really nothing. Case rates are likely higher. I don’t even want to expose you to this because it’s really traumatizing.
But they’re talking again about getting your flu and cooties jabs. And of course, wear your suffocation device, wash your hands, and basically live in fear. This is where Makari came from. Now, here from Wikipedia, it says that during the hogwash, Makari has been a proponent of treating the hogwash as a public health threat, saying that masking and the cocktails and the early jab strategies, blah, blah, he has been a proponent of that. He has also been an outspoken opponent, luckily, of required jabs. However, he said, in February of 2020, that the United States needed to take the threat of this seriously, people should stop all non-essential travel.
He called for a national lockdown to help slow the spread of the hogwash and to enable the healthcare system to respond. So he was in favor of all of that. That is who is at the head of the FDA. He’s the FDA commissioner. And Bob says, I’m excited to work with Marty Makari, not Malarkey, Marty Makari, to restore the FDA’s proud tradition of gold standard evidence-based science and corporate end corporate capture and make America healthy again. I never knew of any gold standard evidence-based science coming out of the FDA. And I’ve told you before that this is very worrisome to me because they’ll come out with these now AI studies that are going to say, good news, we fixed the problem.
These products were rushed to market, but now we know what the problem is. And hey, if you don’t want the YMCA version of that jab, just get the traditional one. Makari himself says that he wants these pharmaceutical companies to come out with the traditional versions so that they can increase vaccination rates. How do you like them apples? For all y’all, not you smart, healthy Americans, but all y’all writing sub stacks, talking about how excited you are that Makari is saying that they’re going to study the YMCA jabs. Well, you need to do a little deeper digging.
So you’re going to tell me that all the other ones are okay. That would be a big N.O. All right, friends, let me know what you think about them apples. Them are pretty rotten apples. This fellow wants to increase the vaccination rates, and he wants to have an alternative to the YMCA jab so that people will have more confidence in becoming a human pin cushion. I’m standing up hashtag never have never will. And I have a feeling that you are as well. Thank you everybody for being on board. I’ll be back with you tomorrow.
That is 9pm Eastern 6pm Pacific. Thank you to the moderators and all the healthy Americans that are standing for freedom, defending truth, and living by your convictions. See you soon, everybody. [tr:trw].
See more of The Healthy American Peggy Hall on their Public Channel and the MPN The Healthy American Peggy Hall channel.