➡ The text discusses a conversation between Raf from the Endgame investor and Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance magazine. They discuss the concept of race, with Taylor arguing that race is a biological reality, not a social construct. He believes that acknowledging racial differences is important, but it doesn’t mean one race is superior to another. They also discuss the idea of human rights, agreeing that all humans, regardless of race, share the same basic rights.
➡ The text discusses the concept of race and nationality in the context of the United States. It argues that the U.S. was initially founded as a white country, with citizenship reserved for white individuals. The text also explores the idea of a melting pot, where immigrants from different European countries assimilated into American society over generations. However, it points out that this assimilation did not extend to American Indians and blacks, who remain distinct groups within the country.
➡ The text discusses the racial and immigration issues in America, focusing on the policies of Donald Trump. It suggests that while Trump’s policies aren’t explicitly aimed at making America predominantly white, their effects seem to lean in that direction. The text also criticizes the idea that America can maintain its identity while replacing its founding population with people from all over the world. It concludes by suggesting that America needs to acknowledge and reverse its immigration mistakes to preserve its original identity.
➡ The text discusses the speaker’s belief that white culture and civilization in the United States are under threat due to increasing diversity and immigration. The speaker suggests that the only way for white culture to survive is to give up on the United States as a whole and create separate, consciously white territories. The speaker also discusses the potential role of the monetary system in these issues, suggesting that the fiat monetary system and inflationary process may contribute to immigration and societal issues. Lastly, the speaker compares the situation to the history of Hanukkah, which they interpret as a civil war within the Jewish community over cultural assimilation.
➡ The text discusses the negative impact of welfare and inflation on work incentives, suggesting that if money couldn’t be printed freely, wages wouldn’t differ much between countries, encouraging more people to work. It criticizes forced charity through government, arguing it goes against human nature. The speaker admires how Jews established their own nation, suggesting it as a model for racially conscious white people. The conversation ends on a hopeful note, despite fears of future conflict, with faith that people will overcome obstacles and return to their roots.

Judaism again. The holidays that Jews celebrate are holidays of their own people. I think that’s a healthy and wonderful thing. Israel is based on the idea that this is a nation for the Jewish people. No matter what part of Europe the immigrants came from, they became indistinguishable from each other in terms of how likely they were to go to college, what their income was going to be, and most importantly, how likely they were to marry outside of their original European ethnicity. The only exception to this rule was Jews. Hey, guys, Raf here from the Endgame investor.

And I got a very special and important guest today that is Jared Taylor. Mr. Jared Taylor, the editor of American Renaissance magazine. And I don’t really know much about this man, but he was referred to me by Phil. And if you watch the channel, you will know who Phil is. And the only thing I know about Mr. Taylor is what I see online. And I know a lot of that is not accurate, but it intrigued me because it gave me the impression that Mr. Taylor is probably the worst person in the world on the planet, and not even this planet, but any conceivable planet in all quantum universe options.

So I want to hear what he has to say, and I’m just going to open up the discussion with. With what I think, what I. What I believe your beliefs are. And I really don’t know anything. I’m very ignorant on this. And I want. I want to. I want to know, because when. When people say that somebody is the worst person in the world, they’re probably very interesting. And I. And I mean that seriously. So from what I understand, you believe that white people are a race and that they are in trouble and that they need to be helped and their culture has to be fixed.

But that I. I know you believe that some cultures are better than others, are superior to others. And I think that’s an obvious statement because let’s say a culture that champions the slaughter of children to BAAL or Molech is inferior to a culture that nurtures children. Right? And unfortunately, in America, we’ve gone back to the culture of mutilating children again. For they call it. What do they call it? Gender affirmation, surgery, whatever they want to say. So there, there’s obviously superior and inferior cultures. Now, I’m not, I’m not sure if there are, according to you, superior and inferior races.

I’m not even sure what a race is. Exactly. I hope that you could fill me in on that. And what makes the white people erase. And I know, like, for example, I’m white, but I’M not of the white race because I’m a Jew. I think you might disagree with that. I don’t know. So what, what is your mission? What makes a race a race? And at the end, we’re going to get back to the money issue because this is a money channel where my contention is that all these problems in cultures, they stem from money printing, which is at the bottom, theft.

And the theft spreads throughout the culture and it creates intense corruption all the way up to the murder of children, which is the stage that we’re at now, unfortunately. So, Jared, what did I get wrong? Sorry, Mr. Taylor, what did I get wrong? What did I get right? And well, well, let’s, let’s start, let’s start with what is a race? Most people have an instinctive understanding of race that’s generally correct. If you look at an Eskimo, he doesn’t look like a Somali. Now there are people who will tell you that there are many, many different races.

We could call these lumpers, as opposed to splitters. And they’re people who generally say maybe they’re five races. The fact that people disagree on where one race ends and when another race begins does not negate the fact that race is a biological phenomenon and it can be defined in the animal kingdom as being part of a subspecies. There are subspecies of tigers, for example. There are subspecies of wildebeests. And people generally say that a subspecies is something that a untrained observer can distinguish accurately at least 9/10 of the time. So if you’re looking at different kinds of wildebeests in the African savannah, you or I, as an untrained observer, can probably distinguish between, I think there are six or eight different subspecies.

When it comes to human beings. A baby can tell the difference. Even a six month old infant who cannot talk, it’s clear from his eye movements, if he’s looking at photographs of different people, that he’s distinguishing between blacks and whites or Asians and Africans, all of this stuff is really rather intuitive. And the idea that race is somehow a sociological optical illusion or a social construct as we’re supposed to believe, that’s just laughably absurd. As a matter of fact, you may not be aware of this, but even from the colonies of bacteria that can be found in, in people’s mouths, you can distinguish between people of different races very, very accurately.

Okay, Mr. Taylor, can, can I react to this? Okay, so now you’re saying, you’re saying that there are, there are races. Obviously there’s races in animals and obviously there’s subspecies Animals, Nobody would dispute you on that fact. Now, I agree factually with what you’re saying. I do believe that there are subspecies of humans, but yes, that. Now let’s, let’s talk about human at least current social, emotional reactions to that kind of a statement. I think that that statement makes a lot of people uncomfortable, even though it’s correct, because too bad. Okay, okay, so, so let’s, let’s address why and maybe we can, maybe we can calm down the emotions here and make people realize that you are right despite the uncomfortability they might feel.

I think the reason that people feel uncomfortable when you say that there are subspecies of humans or humans are divided into different subspecies is because they imagine that once you start admitting that, then eventually one of the subspecies could evolve out of humanity and then lose their human rights. I think you would agree with me that no matter what subspecies of human you might belong to, that you have the same basic human rights as loosely defined by the non aggression principle. The right to life, liberty and property. And let’s forget about the details, but you know, I have, I have no right, you have no right to go up to another human who is not aggressing against you and just murder them because you think there are different subspecies.

Everyone has the same human rights. Everyone, all human subspecies have the same basic human rights. Because as I believe, I’m not sure if you believe, but all humans, all subspecies of humans are created in the image of God and therefore they have certain divine rights. And whether you believe in God or not, that’s not the point. But would you agree with me on that? That it doesn’t matter what subspecies you’re in, Everyone is a human and therefore everyone has the basic rights as defined by the non aggression principle? Yes, we are all the same species, and to that extent we all share equivalent rights.

I think far fewer people are uncomfortable with the idea of race than you seem to suggest. Most people in their daily lives, if you were to say, well, you can you tell an Asian from an African American, they can say, well, of course, easily, anyone can. And the idea that somehow we’re supposed to consider this a racialization, some kind of intellectual overlay on something that is not a biological reality, is in my view so wrong and so stupid that only very smart people could possibly persuade themselves that it’s true. Most people, as they go about their daily lives, they distinguish between races with no trouble at all.

And it’s a kind of intellectual pretense to pretend that there’s some difficult difficulty in doing so. But as far as human rights are concerned, yes, there are basic human rights shared by all human beings. But then I’m rather surprised that you now start saying, okay, if you talk about races, then that might lead to the idea of one race wanting to exterminate another race. I mean, why would one pick race as opposed to nationality or language or religion? A good point. Yes. People have. People have many, many kinds of dividing lines. There’s nothing magical about race.

But of course, the fact that it is biological, that is an important factor. And in all multiracial societies, race is the most significant and difficult fault line because it is a biological fact. You can become a different religion, you can learn to speak a different language, but you can’t change your race. So, yes, it is a phenomenon that divides society, but it is one that will not go away. The divisions that come from race will not disappear by pretending that race somehow does not exist. Okay, so you’re saying we have to acknowledge that race exists. Yeah.

Is. Is. Is interracial, Interracial interaction, Is that inherently a bad thing, or is it something that just has to be managed? Because I’m sure you appreciate your country, America. I don’t know exactly what you appreciate and what you don’t appre about it, but it seems to me that the concept of the west that let’s. Let’s put race to the side for a little bit and not to deny that it exists, but regardless of what sub race or race of humanity we’re in, we can all work together economically and we all have the same basic human rights.

And that’s what American society should be based on. Would you agree with that? Well, if you go back to the founding of the United States, it was founded by people who were explicitly white. They consider themselves white. And if you look at the first naturalization law passed in 1790, this is the first Congress of the United States, a brand new country, first met in 1989. I’m sorry, 1789. Yeah. And it had to figure out a lot of basic things. What kind of country is this? Who is going to become an American? And the very first law passed to that effect reserved citizenship to free white persons of good character.

So the United States was founded explicitly as a white country. And until 1965, it had an immigration policy that was deliberately designed to keep the country majority white. So the idea that somehow from the beginning, the United States was this kind of anyone goes, we welcome all that is a complete myth. And if you go, maybe it’s a myth in terms of citizen. Right. It might be a myth in terms of citizen rights, but I don’t think it’s a myth regarding human rights. No, but citizenship is an important distinction. Who are you going to let into your country and let them become a citizen? That is an essential question.

Every nation have to, has to make that decision. Israel makes that decision. Yes, very explicitly on the basis of religion or if you prefer, race. And I think people say, oh, well, it’s a religion matter, not a race matter. Well, was Albert Einstein a Jew? Well, he was an atheist. You know, he still. We’re a mix. What we are is a little bit different. We’re a mix. We have, we are a nation. I mean, if you take the biblical account that has a constitution called the Torah and some of us follow it and some of us don’t.

Like, imagine, imagine America gets exiled and you have this group of Americans that are really into judicial Supreme Court precedents or something. And they, they follow American law, even in exile, but it’s kind of watered down, but it’s not really. But they really, they remember their grandparents were American and they try to preserve whatever American traditions they had. They eat turkey on Thanksgiving, even if they’re in like, like Swaziland or something, just to preserve it. And then they, that’s sort of what we are, they’re converts. So we’re not exactly a race. Well, except that you can be a Jew and you can be a citizen of Israel and welcomed and recognized as such without giving a hoot about the Torah.

Yes, it’s true. It is, it is both aspects. There is clearly a biological aspect. A Jew is someone who is the child of a Jewish woman. It’s hard to be any more specifically biological than that. Yes, it is possible to convert to Judaism, but Israel is based on the idea that this is a nation for the Jewish people. Most nations that we see today were founded. Well, it was taken for granted. France was to be for French people, Germany was to be for German people. And most non white countries definitely preserve that distinction. Japan is for the Japanese.

If you were to go to Japan and say, oh, you know, not a bad country you have here, but the problem with Japan, you know, too many Japanese, you need diversity, you need to import. So, oh, Indians are great, Pakistanis are wonderful, you know, and ginger the place up with, I don’t know, Indonesians, they, they would call for the men in the white coats. They recognize Japan as being a nation for Japanese. It is only in European countries or the European diaspora, so to speak. Canadians, Americans, Australians in New Zealanders, only The people founded by Europeans who are somehow considered to be evil.

If they say country was built by my ancestors, a specific group for us, and it’s only white people who are unable to say to newcomers who want to come to our very successful societies, it’s very difficult for whites to say, no, this is for us. You, Indonesian or Turk or Vietnamese or whoever you are, you must flourish where you were planted. Because we wish to have a nation that is based on our traditions and will preserve our people and our traditions forever. That is something every other nation can do. But white people have been denatured to the point where it has become very, very difficult to say that.

Right. Okay. So there’s a. There’s a problem here when you say problem at all. Okay. So in my head, I am trying to figure it out and hopefully you can help me. So let’s say we go back to 1790. Even at that point, America was filled with a lot people that would have been considered separate races in their home countries. France, England, Spain, Scotland. I mean, these are all different. These would all be different races in their home countries. And then they end up in America in the. In the early 1700s until through the Revolution. And now they’re all considered white.

I mean, that’s. To me, that just sounds like a more general term for someone who came from Europe who has white skin. But that wouldn’t have been considered a race back in Europe. So there’s not much cultural identity, there’s not much racial identity in whiteness, because before they came to America, before they crossed the ocean, they would have just been considered French or German or Italian or wherever they came from, Irish, whatever, and they all end up in America. Now, what are they going to be called? Well, if you are in a society that is all one race or on a continent which has practically no one from Asia or Africa, you’re going to then find distinctions that are not racial, obviously.

And clearly. And so an Irishman considers himself Irish, he doesn’t consider himself white because he’s probably never met a non white person ever. If he has traveled around in Europe, he’s met Frenchmen and he sees differences between Frenchmen and Irishmen, Frenchmen and Italians. All of those things are true. However, once they came to the United States, the unifying factor for those people is that they were European. And there was definitely a melting pot. So long as the ingredients of that melting pot were European. And this is essentially a biological phenomenon. If you look at the genetics of northern Europeans and even southern Europeans, there is a distinct similarity in that sense, the race that you belong to is your extended family taken in the largest sense.

And it is natural to have a kind of fellow feeling for these people. And once they come to the United States, they no longer speak their original language. They all do try to become Americans. And after about three generations, no matter what part of Europe the immigrants came from, they became indistinguishable from each other in terms of how likely they were to go to college, what their income was going to be, and most importantly, how likely they were to. To marry outside of their original European ethnicity. The only exception to this rule was Jews. Jews were much more likely to remain endogamous.

And so that is a slightly separate aspect of the melting pot. But as far as gentile Europeans are concerned, the melting pot really did work in a successful way. To then say, well, okay, the melting pot is going to work for everybody from everywhere. That is obviously folly. When you said that in 1790, when you said that in 1790 the country was composed of different races, I thought you were not going to be talking about different so called races of Europe. I thought you were going to talk about American Indians and blacks. Oh, well, we could talk about that.

I missed that. Yeah, that’s true. Yes. And when you talk about American Indians and blacks and you say, well, okay, the Europeans who showed up, the ethnics, the Hungarians, the Italians, the Irish, Irish, they were swallowed with a certain amount of complexity. There were Anglos who wanted no Irish. There were Anglos who didn’t want anybody whose name ended in a vowel. Yes, there were such people. But Europeans more or less managed to assimilate. And as I said, in about three generations, they became sociologically indistinguishable from the founding stock. That was never the case with American Indians and blacks.

They were always a distinct people, despite having been on the continent for in many cases even up to a century or more longer than the European ethnics who showed up. Why were they not assimilated? Some people say, well, because they were discriminated against. This, that and the other. Well, those discrimination, as all of that discrimination, certainly in an official way, has ended. And yet they are still distinct, unassimilated groups. Because assimilation is so much more difficult if you’re trying to cross a racial boundary. Okay, I understand that point. Now, this is going to be a big question.

You know, what, what are the pro. What are the problems you see in America? Where do they come from and how is it solvable? Now? Are these immigration problems, what should be done with these races that are not of the white race? Should they be expelled? Should they just be left alone? Should we take away the right to vote from them so they stop polluting the Congress? I mean, what, what are we supposed to do? Yes, that is a big and a very, very difficult question. What’s happening in the United States now under Donald Trump is not an explicit effort to make America white again.

But some of the effects of those policies are doing this. As you may know, Donald Trump immediately dropped, drew, the immigration, I’m sorry, the refugee quota from 150,000 under Biden down to zero initially. And then he has decided, okay, we’re going to let in 7,500 refugees and we’re going to prioritize Afrikaners, white South Africans who are fleeing their country, and also Europeans who have been persecuted for complaining about massive immigration into Europe. This is a remarkable change from the let anybody in America’s up for grabs attitude of the Biden administration. Again, he’s not saying we’re going to make America white again, but this is the kind of policy one would have if that was the intention.

Also, this concerted effort to deport all illegal immigrants. Well, what’s the majority of illegal immigrants? Overwhelmingly non white. This too has the effect of making the United States whiter. Now, can Donald Trump, or let us imagine JD Vance for two successful terms as president after Donald Trump. Can this magical continuation of a Trumpian view of the United States or these policies, could it make America white again? No, I think that’s just not possible. Even if you got J.D. vance himself is, is an interracial marriage. She’s married to an Indian woman. She’s married to an Indian. Yes.

Now and again, this is assuming that that is the plan. Now, Donald Trump has never said that he has talked about the United States reaching a kind of tipping point for which the only solution is reverse immigration. Well, what’s he talking about? What does he mean by tipping point? I suspect what he means is the projections that by 2040, 2045, whites will be a minority. And the idea that somehow you can swap out the white population and replace it with people from everywhere and the United States will continue as it always has been is, for me, frankly, absurd.

I agree with you 100% because. Continue on your thought. I just wanted to react for a second like, you know, I’m in Israel and we obviously have a racial divide with the Arabs and we’re in a demographic war and a lot of them. That’s right, not all. Most of them want to kill all of us. We think so we’re in a serious problem here and it’s racial. And I’m not going to sit here and deny what you’re saying is true. It’s absolutely true. It’s, it’s your, it’s your parallel of the same problems we have here. Yes, 100 correct.

And I’m glad you see it that way. There are many Jews of the United States who will say, well, yes, Israel is a nation for Jews, but America has to be a nation for everyone. If you see the people who are pushing immigration the hardest, traditionally they have been Jews. Some of the most fierce critics of Donald Trump and his immigration policy have been Jews. Now, I’m not saying that all Jews are in that camp, but I, I apologize on behalf of my people for the behavior of those people. They are very dangerous and my mission is to go up against them specifically.

Well, good, good. I’m glad we have an ally. I have never been among those who say, and some do that, well, because of this kind of behavior, all Jews are our enemies and they’re the main problem. No, there are some Jews, I know quite a few myself, who are very loyal men of the west and they want America to be European. They want it to be white, unabashedly so, and white forever. But if you look at the aggregate effect of Jewish intellectuals and Jewish politicians in the United States, it has been to undercut any kind of moral justification for a white oriented America or a return to a more coherent racial and cultural view or image of the United States.

Be that as it may, the point that I’m, I’m very glad you recognize is that the United States is not some place that has suspended the laws of human nature. Just yesterday there was an editorial in the New York Times written by Vivek Ramaswamy. He is a man of Indian origin, married to another Indian. He ran for in the Republican primary to be president and he’s now running to be governor of Ohio. And he came down very hard on the idea America is just, is just a concept nation. Anyone can be an American now. Very interesting that he is formulating a reason to say, okay, that means I’m just as American as somebody who came over on the Mayflower.

Well, that’s a very handy position to take for people who are, in effect, newcomers, who are racial aliens, frankly, to the ideas of the founding Fathers. But this is based on the idea of what Vivek Ramaswamy calls American exceptionalism. The idea that, as I just said, you could replace the founding stock with people from anywhere and everywhere and it would still be American. This preposterous nonsense, utter nonsense, is something that he would apply only to the United States. He says, this is American exceptionalism. Well, the United States has not suspended the laws of human nature. And to pretend that it has ultimately leads to the suicide of the United States as it was founded.

And I would wish it to be so. What can the United States do now to preserve whatever good it has left? What, what do they need to do? To me, the idea of the United States as a political entity, it is something that my ancestors have been part of even before it was a country. The first Taylor came in 1635. He was part of that move of Europeans who intended to build a European nation. Now, ever since 1965, when the immigration changed and we were letting in people from all around the world, we have set in motion this dispossession of whites, reducing whites to a minority.

This was never advertised as either the intent or the consequence of the Heart Seller act, as it’s called, which changed American immigration policy. That was never the intent. In fact, it was sold to Congress with the idea this is just a kind of a. This is a cosmetic measure. It’s not going to change the racial balance of the United States. So you can vote for this and America is going to be remain unchanged. I think that if you had told the congressman at that time, well, in 80 years, America is going to be majority non white.

The answer to that bill would not have been no. The answer would have been hell, no. Whites do not want to become a minority. But these days, if you say no, no, we would like to remain the majority because our ancestors built this. We conquered it, in effect, from the Indians. Yes, we did a number of things that don’t look very good in retrospect. We blocked, we bought black slaves. But this country was founded to be a European nation of European people, certainly as the overwhelming majority. If you say that, well, then you’re a Nazi and you’re a white supremacist and you’re a moral inferior and you need to be driven out of polite society.

And yet that was the idea of America. So what do we do now? In effect, the United States, like so many European countries such as Europe or Germany, that have let in so many non whites. And the transformation has been much more recent in European countries than in the United States. In effect, we have to say, we made a mistake. We made a terrible mistake. And for our survival as a people, as a nation, we have to reverse the consequences of this mistake. Yes, we let you in. But you took advantage of a terrible mistake. You people who came from Mexico or from India or from China, you took advantage of a people who were inflicting upon themselves a destiny that you would never accept from your homeland.

You know very well, Mr. Korean, that if people were pouring into Korea and threatening to reduce Koreans to a minority, you wouldn’t stand for that. But you have taken part in this process that defeats the United States, as I conceive it. So what do we do? Certainly, we get rid of every single illegal immigrant who is here. And Donald Trump is doing that. Of course, he’s facing a tremendous amount of opposition, not just from foreigners, but for many white people who think that virtue requires that they take these positions that will ultimately lead to their own oblivion.

This is a disease unique to white people. You could never persuade non whites that it’s somehow virtuous to march off the stage of history and to turn your country over to people who are not like you, who don’t want to be like you and can’t be like you. Only white people are susceptible to this kind of manipulation. So I think on the one hand, we can say we made a mistake and you should not be here and try to create incentives, incentives for them to go back home. Some may, but many will not. So what do we do? I think that the only way in which my people and my civilization can survive in the United States is in effect, to give up on this entity known as the United States of America.

Break it up. I don’t think it has to be broken up. Obviously, that is a fiendishly difficult undertaking. Even it’s. It’s a difficult undertaking, but like. Yes, but it’s. It’s inevitable because if you don’t do it in a controlled demolition, it’s going to explode into something much worse than that. Maybe not. It is possible that white people will disappear with a whimper rather than a bang. In Europe, people are talking about possible civil war in France between whites and the immigrants. People are talking about the same thing in Great Britain. I think that that is perhaps, it’s perhaps more likely in Europe because, as I said, the racial transformation in those countries has been more rapid.

There are more people who remember what it was like, what it was like when the country was all French or all German or all British. And they know that was better. Those people may fight here in the United States, we have had so many generations of brainwashing of diversity is our greatest strength. It is not inconceivable that the United States white people will just Shrug their shoulders and say, okay, it’s futile. There’s no hope. We will just go down and become minorities, even if that means our children and grandchildren are not just minorities, but despised and exploited minorities.

I hope that doesn’t happen now. The alternate alternative is perhaps violence. I think that can be avoided. I think these things can be worked out. If enough white people finally realize what is at stake, that their culture and their destiny and their descendants are threatened with the worst kind of exploitation and dispossession, they will start saying, look, we’ve got to work something out. And I believe that will result in a kind of territorial division. My suspicion is that it will start small. You’re never going to get a Congress elected with an increasingly non white electorate working out some kind of plan to say, okay, we can draw the lines here, we can draw the lines there.

No, I think it’s going to happen locally and it will result in perhaps counties becoming consciously white and encouraging non whites to move out. All of this can be done legally. But if we do nothing, and that’s the title of one of my collections of essays, by the way, if we Do Nothing, the fate of whites is ultimately either to be shoved aside or genetically overwhelmed through miscegenation, in effect one way or another to go extinct. And I think no people should be condemned to that kind of fate. I, I agree completely with what you’re saying.

I just wanted to point out that this being a money channel and I said we would get this at the end, I want to say something about money and then something about Hanukkah, because Hanukkah is very relevant to what you’re saying, if you know the history of it at all. So one thing, and I’m not saying this is going to solve everything, but one thing that could bring America a giant step forward to preserving the white race, whatever that might be, and calming down the racial tensions between the races that are already there, is you got to collapse the dollar and you got to stop the fiat monetary system.

And that will come to an end by itself. Because you can trace all these problems back ultimately to money being printed. Why? Because then it becomes profitable. If you can print money off of the gold supply, right? There’s also things that pure fiat currency, it’s all, it all goes back to gold ultimately, even now. But if you can, if you can suck value from the existing currency and, and use it to spend on what you want, because you’re the government and you have the central bank to print the money first, and therefore you get all the purchasing power.

Then you can import people who will, then you can give them welfare and then they’ll, that’s basically buying a vote. And then there are people will infiltrate the government and then make them the flow of those immigrants even stronger. It’s a self reinforcing feedback loop that destroys the productive people. Because if you have a money that is honest and you can’t just print it, then you have to, then you have to preserve resources, right? You can’t just afford to give people welfare if you can’t print the money to do it. Because then you have to tax people directly and they don’t want that.

So they will say no immigrants because then we see taxes being raised on me and I have to give them more of my paycheck and I don’t want that. But they can’t see inflation immediately. So if you stop the inflationary process, you will stop the flow of immigration and then you can start to rehabilitate the society. The second thing that I wanted to say is that Hanukkah is exactly what you’re talking about. Because people have this, this, this misinterpretation of what actually happened. It was not a war of the Jews against the Greeks. It’s not that the Greeks invaded the assimilationist Jews, the miscegenationist Jews as you, you’re talking about miscegenation.

So the Hellenized Jews who wanted to import the Greek culture into Judea, they, they basically said, you know, we’re gonna, they want to do this for hundreds of years. They got really forceful about it. They invited Antiochus in to make these laws to force Hellenism on the Jewish culture. And then they took over the temple and they took up arms. They were supplied by Antiochus and it was Jews versus Jews. It was a Jewish civil war. And ultimately the traditionalists won and we got back the temple and we killed a lot of our brothers and sisters.

That’s what happened. It’s a very racist holiday. And, and, and it’s the one Dafka specifically that most Jews celebrate in some kind of weird twist. They don’t even realize what they’re doing. Well, and it is a civil war that probably was not caused by phony money either. This, these things can happen. You can import people who are objectively your enemy even if you don’t have a central bank that is printing money now. They did, they did. There was coin clipping, there was the dilution of it. They didn’t have the technology to print it, but they did dilute it.

And and through that process, it did make it worse. Yeah. Well, that is one of the great strengths of Judaism is that its holidays are a celebration of the ancestral Jewish people. And that means a great deal, I believe, for people who are faithful to their tradition that means they’re faithful to their people. Christianity, of course, is supposed to be a universal religion. And there are passages in it that sound as though any kind of distinction, not just of wealth or nationality or language, but certainly race as well. All of these distinctions are somehow illegitimate in the Christian faith.

Whereas Judaism, again, the holidays that Jews celebrate are holidays of their own people. I think that’s a healthy and wonderful thing. Well, then the white race will need white holidays. We used to have white holidays. We used to have George Washington’s birthday, right? We have Thanksgiving, which was a white holiday. We used to have Lincoln’s birthday in the south. We had Robert E. Lee’s birthday. These were all white holidays. Now we have to celebrate Martin Luther King. Now we have to celebrate something called Juneteenth, which. Juneteenth. As if anyone cared about that. Two national holidays for blacks.

As I like to point out, there are only two individuals whose birthdays are celebrated as national holidays in the United States. One is Jesus Christ and one is Martin Luther King. What kind of suicidal folly is that? But this is the kind of society that Americans have fashioned for themselves. As I said, we have made colossal mistakes and undoing the consequences of these mistakes will be very, very difficult. If changing the monetary system helps. And I’m not necessarily convinced that that’s the case. I think all of the things could have happened. Cheap labor, for example. You can want cheap labor even if you have sound money.

I feel sure that although I don’t entirely understand all of your arguments, I don’t see why you might not want to import Mexican prune pickers if you can pay them cents on the dollar compared to native born white Americans. But in any case, we need to solve this problem or we go extinct. I know that sounds like a harsh set of alternatives, But I believe 100% that that is what is in store for us if we do nothing. Well, just to answer a technical point, what you were saying, and then let’s say we’ll, we’ll end on that.

And I’ll give you the closing. The closing words, why you wouldn’t necessarily import cheap Mexican labor if you’re on an honest money standard is that that if you’re, if you’re in the country that’s printing money and handing out welfare based on inflation, Right. And then you, you give people a base salary based on welfare because you can print money, and that’s going to raise the rate that they would want to give up that money to work. Right, because they have to give up their welfare if they’re going to get a job, usually. So if you can’t print the money, then the, then the, the wages of a, of, of an American versus a Mexican wouldn’t be that different.

And then an American would go to work because he can’t get welfare because he’s on an honest money standard. And you can’t just print it. Well, I think welfare is a terrible thing. I believe that charity should be voluntary. If I’m concerned about my fellow man, I should reach into my own pocket voluntarily and fund organizations that I think efficiently help people who are in need. Once you get the government in that business, this is charity at the point of a gun. The government pulls out a gun, in effect, and says, taylor, pay up. And we’re going to take X amount of what you pay up, and we’re going to give it to people you don’t even know.

And you probably might dislike them if you knew them. This to me, is crazy, obligatory. Charity runs against human nature in a profound sense. And it is this kind of government operation multiplied in so many different directions that has certainly been part of the problem. But I think that you could have that without sound money. But again, I’m not an expert on this, and I’m in no position to, to debate you, but if we are to end on a. On a note that I might be permitted to express, it is a profound admiration for what Jews have done.

Jews who did not have a nation of their own. They said, look, we need one, we deserve one. And this is one that we believe was given to our ancestors by God. Jews went there, they established a nation, and they have a nation. In some respects, that is a model for racially conscious white people. How do we establish a nation when the one we’re living in is no longer our nation? And I think all models of people who have succeeded in that respect can be useful for those of us who do not want to disappear. Well, this was certainly a fascinating conversation.

I expected it to be so. We do have to be race conscious. I myself am certainly race conscious. So I don’t know if Jews are a race or sort of one. But, you know, whatever the definition is, I, I really wish America the best, and I want to see them succeed. I want to see the white race succeed. I left America because I belong here. And frankly, I’m very scared that very soon the Jews are going to be slaughtered again. I see all the patterns already and I’m waiting for it. And it makes me cry inside.

But I knew it was going to happen. That’s why I’m here. Gosh. Well, after that, it’s a little bit difficult for me to wish you a happy Hanukkah. No, no, I’m positive. Like, no, I’m not. Like, I’m not dooming or anything like that. I know we’ll be okay. Good. And. And a certain part of America will also live on, no matter what happens. I believe so too. I am optimistic. More and more people are waking up all the the time. More and more people are waking up. But they become conscious of the immense obstacles and difficulties that lie in their path.

But with sufficient will, we can succeed. Yes. And so can you. God willing. And may. May God be with you, Mr. Taylor. And may God be with us all. And we’ll all go back to our roots, however far back we can get to them. Thank you very much. Appreciate your inviting me to be on your program. I appreciate you coming. Thank you.
[tr:tra].

See more of Rafi Farber on their Public Channel and the MPN Rafi Farber channel.