➡ The text discusses the complex political strategies of Trump, particularly in relation to the Middle East. It suggests that his seemingly aggressive actions and statements may be part of a larger plan to create confusion and achieve certain goals. The text also raises questions about the distribution of military aid and equipment, suggesting that it may not always end up where it is intended. The author encourages the audience to watch how these situations unfold before making judgments.

➡ The discussion revolves around a new peace deal, its potential impact, and the introduction of tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. The speaker suggests that while these changes may initially cause strain, they could ultimately lead to a more balanced and fair economic landscape. They also discuss the potential for companies to return to the U.S. for production, and the importance of a gradual transition to avoid economic shock. Lastly, they hint at future discussions on topics like the IRS becoming the ERS, Mexican cartels, and the whereabouts of military equipment from Afghanistan.

What’s up, folks? Welcome to Nino’s Corner.tv. I’m joined with S.G. Annan. We’re going to take this to the back channel on Nino’s Corner.tv to talk about this in depth, in detail. But first and foremost, S.G., I’m going to go ahead and bring this up and share the first of all, thank you for joining me. Number one. Thank you for having me, Nino. It’s good to be back. And here we go. I’m going to start off by reading this. A lot of people are confused by this. Shalom. This almost sounds like, you know, Trump has been up there on the joint session speech talking about peace.

We want peace. You know, I’m a guy at peace. And then it’s like something possesses him. And he writes this. Shalom Hamas means hello and goodbye. You can choose. Release all of the hostages now, not later, and immediately return all of the dead bodies of the people you murdered, or it is over for you. Only sick and twisted people keep bodies and you are sick and twisted. I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job. Not a single Hamas member will be safe if you don’t do as I say. I have just met with your former hostages whose lives you’ve destroyed.

This is your last warning for the leadership. Now is the time to leave Gaza while you still have a chance. Also, the people of Gaza, a beautiful future awaits, but not if you hold hostages. If you do, you are dead. Make a smart decision, release the hostages now, or they will be held to pay later. This is like a different guy. I don’t know. I’m sorry. I’m not following SG, so you want to just go ahead and clarify on this. What’s your thoughts? I’d be happy to. And I knew when this came out from the president’s truth social that this would be one of the main sticking points that a lot of people would instantaneously have.

And I can understand and empathize with that particular conclusion on the surface when we look at the dynamics in the world, the geopolitical movements and power plays and counter moves that are actually happening. But we also have to consider something that’s extremely important, especially with the Western world. And that pertains to optics. When we talk about Hamas, we’re not talking about an Islamic terrorist organization. We’re talking about an extension of the Western intelligence community. That intelligence community has had control of all terrorist factions and organizations and fragmented groups over the last 35 to 50 years, depending on how you want to slice that particular pie, but at least as far back as Iran Contra.

But when we look at what’s happening here, playing out on the ground in Gaza, it is an absolute human travesty and an unbelievably catastrophic event that has occurred there. And I don’t want to minimize or diminish that in any form whatsoever. But what is the bigger angle on this? What is the bigger component to play here? What is the long term implication? The long term implication is to eventually arrive at a multi-state or multi-representative multicultural group solution. The Palestinians will have to take lead on that because clearly if you have if you’re laying an ancestral claim to a land, there will never be cultural peace between any particular group of demographics.

If you don’t allow them to lead or at least be at the table and have a decisive vote and how that process moves forward. And none of that can occur, you know, while we have ISIS, Mossad, Hamas, which are all of the same entities. We’re not talking about separate factions. And that’s something that’s so difficult for patriots to sort of wrap their brain around. We’re talking about different tentacles off of this exact same job of the hut that have been waging the globalist domestic landscape and international landscape warfare campaigns on behalf of the financiers, the occultic masters, the puppeteers at the very top for a very long time.

This is a clear invitation to do two things, in my opinion, to remove the Western intelligence community infestation masquerading as Hamas in that area of the world, which opens up a new pathway for different geopolitical dynamics, not just from Israel, not just from Palestine, but from Jordan, Turkey, Egypt, in some ways Algeria with respect to this, in some ways South Africa. There’s going to be a different angle that’s going to come to the table as a result of removing Hamas, but it also emboldens the shadow state structure, the same intelligence community infestation on the other side of that coin to make increasingly more overt counter moves, perhaps moves that lead to a walking back of Western optics.

And I’m being a little bit speculative on that. And I’m referring specifically to the other side of that coin concentrated primarily in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, that is also not representative of what the people in that particular nation state and what that culture and group of individuals really, truly want for the region long term as well. So when I see things like this from President Trump, what I see is a movement not only of the optics at the surface level in the world, a daring, if you will, of the remaining deep state, shadow state components in that area to make themselves more overtly known and more fully exposed.

But it is also a backhanded way of chopping at that same Hydra by forcing another side of that coin into the light where the public begins to understand that it has to be either this way or that way. It cannot be both. Well, here’s how I see this. This is obviously a declaration of war, and this is just more funding to Israel. It’s kind of like he’s shifting from Ukraine to Israel. Just shifting. That’s all it seems like to me. So I’m going to be honest with you. I don’t see any good in this at all.

At all. And what I’m seeing here on the southern border is military, and I’m seeing armored striker vehicles show up. You know, this is getting a little I’m getting uneasy because this to me is no, no, no, we’re not just stopping immigration. We’re getting ready for a pretty mid to full scale war here here on the border. So there’s a lot of things happening that I’m watching here and ground zero SG. But first, folks, get your noble gold. Yep. How’d you like that segue? Gold is up 46% in a year, doubling NASDAQ and S&P 500 gains.

But this isn’t just another rally. Global reserves are shifting and investors rush to secure physical gold creating a massive supply gap. Gold is vanishing from the market, but you still have a chance, folks. This is noblegoldinvestions.com today and turn your panic into profit. Make a qualified investment and noble gold will add a free 10th. Not 10, but 10th and ounce gold point to your order noblegoldinvestments.com noblegoldinvestments.com get in it now, folks. It’s getting crazy out there. All right, SG. So I know we’re going to take a lot of this to the back channel, but I just wanted you to give a good message to my to my fluff crowd here that this is really you look at this as optics for me.

I just I kind of see this as a pivot as a shift because we all and we’re going to talk about what Hamas really was that that invaded Israel. I’m going to tell you right now who I really believe that was and I’ll talk to you and we’ll talk about it on the back channel. I know you know you think the same thing as me, but you’re saying this is optics. I mean, it seems to me I’ve said March is going to be a really big month. Do you agree with me on that? SG, do you think March, April, two really big months? March is the month of war.

And what I’m seeing here in the southern border kind of shows me that’s what we’re preparing for. I’m hearing a lot of chatter about the cartels joining forces, building more tunnels and bug outs and hideouts in Mexico. This is this is getting ridiculous. And here we are with this post from Trump, basically a declaration of war, SG. Indeed. And when we look at it from, again, that surface level perspective, we have to be very, very careful and understand that when we have the demographic here in the United States of America is overwhelmingly pro Israel is overwhelmingly pro Jerusalem and is overwhelmingly faith based in that support.

And there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that. But there is a disparity in understanding, I think, you know, in the current day and time that there’s a difference between what we would call the nation state of Tel Aviv in the modern era and what the actual people of Israel constituted of the days of old. And we sort of conflate our ideals there and looking at what is going on here with President Trump. And again, with this post to me, it strikes me as clearly an ode to that larger majority, that very massive demographic that holds political clout here in the United States.

That can stonewall other objectives at the state level and at the bureaucratic level and at the judicial level, for example, in the federal judiciary. And we would have to keep in mind that this is one cog on a multi cog wheel. And so for your audience out there, I would just encourage them to be slow to react, to understand that Trump has a history of saying very bombastic things with another purpose in mind. In December, for example, he went out and basically dared the BRICS nations to de-dollarize. And so that poured a great deal of gasoline on a fire that ostensibly you would think this individual would not want to fuel.

And yet when we consider certain perspectives that have been offered with respect to things like counterintelligence or other high level domain-based interpretations of things, I think we have to keep in mind that there is a certain benefit from creating a disparity or a confusion in that public optic that allows other things to move forward. You know, I really do believe like when I first saw Trump in a meeting with Netanyahu and he said that he was going to build, you know, build out Gaza and make it like what did he say he was going to make it like a Riviera? Riviera.

There you go Riviera. Yeah, that’s what I was looking for. You know, I was thinking to myself, is he calling Netanyahu’s bluff here? I mean, it didn’t look like Netanyahu wanted to hear that. And he was going to relocate all these refugees all over the Middle East. I was like, okay, this I can see the tactic here. I can see the tactic. But this to me now is like, ah, forget it. I’m going to go ahead and arm Israel and we’re going to bomb the hell out of you. What is going on? You’re saying this is optics.

I don’t see it that way. I see it as a blatant declaration of war. Well, and that is the other side of the coin that has to be considered here. And again, you know, I would stress, you know, for yourself and for the audience to, you know, maybe watch how this plays out. It is relatively new. And like you said, there have been categorical moves made by the DJT crowd and the and both himself and the crowd around him that do not seem to benefit or serve the overarching unilateral aims of Netanyahu and the Likud party on the ground in that area of the world.

The complete dismantling of certain components of the central banking group that we talk about oftentimes on this particular program is a major factor in that. When we look at the financing and the locus of control that exists behind worldwide media and a great deal of worldwide technology, right? When we start to talk about other agendas that YouTube would immediately down us for, we can see how that particular nation state would come into play with a lot of that. And there’s, you know, the advice, of course, that comes out from, you know, the days of old.

But the sunsew art of war appear one way when you are in fact another. And so that is something that I try to fall back on and just allow it to flesh itself out in the days. And, you know, perhaps the week or two or three that follows after that and try to get a taste of flavor of what the purpose of things may actually be. And if I, you know, whenever I come to those conclusions where I fundamentally disagree with certain things that the man is doing, I say so. But I try to give it just a little bit of leeway based on the altitude.

You know, I’ve said that. And I’ve had enough guests on my show where I feel like I’ve gotten some bits and pieces here and there and to the puzzle and I can put it together myself pretty well. But this kind of threw me off. This post really threw me off. And it makes me think there might be another agenda here, SG. I’m just saying it just it doesn’t add up to me at all. The part where he said, you know, we’re going to relocate them and move them around. I was like, OK, I can see the tactic there, but I can’t see a tactic in this because, you know, they’re going to go full force on this.

And so what is he doing? All he’s doing is moving the or shifting aid from Ukraine to now Israel to go to war with Hamas. You know, and we all know what Hamas is. You just basically said what it is. We’ll go into more detail on that. I mean, I was going to TV, but I’m sorry, man. I can’t I can’t help me see what you see. I. Well, let’s approach it from another angle. When we look at what’s happening in the Middle East and what’s going on in that broader area of the world, we have a couple of other maneuvers between those nation states that simply have to occur.

One of those maneuvers is a is a particular RV that’s heavily heavily underway on the ground inside Baghdad and in other areas of that particular country. One of those maneuvers also includes the dragging out on the purging of the IRGC community out of Tehran, who is no different, essentially, than the central intelligence community on this side of the border. Right. We have a different flavor, a different faction of the same Hydra operating in all of these different pulpits. In that mix, we have to consider that one party or another is not going to maneuver themselves or out themselves or be willing to test certain waters unless they feel so emboldened or unless they feel like those waters are going to give them something in return that’s viable and valuable.

So when we look at what’s happening here with respect to this discussion about I’m sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job in, well, reading straight from the message here, one of the things that I consider is that that particular nation state has already been the recipient of several billion dollars worth of U.S. military aid just in the last six to 12 months alone. That particular nation state does not require a great deal of extra munitions and armament and indeed could finish the job much more quickly if the White House simply gave them a nod of approval.

Instead of sending them a manifest of cargo of some kind and forcing them to wait even longer to move in, insinuating here that Israel is not equipped to do that job. So what happens, just as a hypothetical, you know, if that particular equipment, that so-called military aid purposed for this particular purpose, ends up flying into Iranian borders and into the Iranian capital. What happens if it ends up flying into Iraq, into Baghdad, into other areas of the Middle East? Where is it going to be traced to and what does that locus of control and chain of custody actually look like? It’s very damning if we were to speculate a smoking gun situation here where the gun was pulled from Tel Aviv, but the ammunition, which was originally purposed to go south, is now going eastward with the United States sort of having a little bit of egg on its face.

And I think that plays into the personality behind who Donald Trump really is. When we look at the inclination to not be ever told what to do, to sort of run roughshod over everyone else’s idea, which is how he’s been painted in many regards. But we also have to appreciate the art of the dealmaker, the pragmatism, the desire to be right, the desire to be confident and capable. I think you’re playing right into a situation that ends up being a diplomatic catastrophe for that particular nation state on the ground there bordering the Mediterranean, which we all know has been involved in levels of criminality that would make the Central Intelligence Agency blush.

SG, what about the military weaponry that when we pulled out of Afghanistan, where did all that go? Where is that right now? All that weaponry, all that machinery, where is it right now? Well, a great deal of it has been sold through back channels and through arms dealing trades and through various networks across the Middle East and Africa. And that’s another reason I think that you’re seeing moves like this made at the surface level. And if I’m not mistaken, we’re also into direct rhetoric now with respect to the group on the ground in Afghanistan returning a component amount of that military aid and equipment.

But from what I’ve seen, the request has been around $7 billion when the actual leaving behind was claimed to be $85 billion all through the campaign trail. So in other words, $78 billion of it would be completely unaccounted for. And I think that you’re going to see a lot of that begin to emerge in processes like the ones that I’m hypothesizing here with your audience could occur in the coming weeks and months as a result of essentially what amounts to a gigantic dare that was issued by the sitting president. And I’m going to say that I’ve heard some of it, it made its way to Mexico for the cartels, allegedly.

And I want to get into that on the back channel. And I want to talk to you about the Zelensky peace deal, which I think is going to go bump in my opinion. And I want to talk to you about that. I want to war game that with you, SG on Nino’s corner TV. So what you’re telling my audience here is that this is this is optics, and there’s a method to the madness. That’s what you’re saying there. What I’m saying is that that is a worthy consideration that we should entertain for the moment, because this is so very brand new.

We should watch the landscape how it plays out in the coming days and weeks, because this individual ran categorically orally and very loudly on de escalation of military conflict and all arenas and all theaters and putting this particular nation first. And this is also an individual who I think understands based again on pragmatism and a history in business and very high level negotiations that when you ruin your word, when you break your promise, when you ruin what you’ve said, and it stays that way long term, you are forever more hampered and shunned by the crowd and by the community.

And I just don’t think a scenario exists, Nino, where that particular individual is going to allow that scenario to become the long term historic implication. So I’m looking at this, and I’m acknowledging that because it is relatively brand new, we should slow our emotions just a tad, and I’m not against criticizing it just for the record. If we go on into a pattern of events in the coming weeks that is categorically detrimental to what I believe and what you believe and all of us Patriots believe to be, you know, the point of America first and putting that particular group, you know, forward into the forefront of the world.

And I think we owe it to the peoples of the world to stand up and say so and to speak some truth to power, but I would just admonish that we should give that power a little bit of leniency at this point. SG, I want to get one last opinion of yours, or educated opinion of yours on here, and that is the tariffs. Now it’s what, 25% to Canada, 25% to Mexico, 20%, is it 20%, 25% to China? I can’t remember the exact numbers, but this is obviously going to cause a huge economic shift in Canada, Mexico, China.

It’s going to be a tariff war now. What’s your thoughts? Good or bad? What’s your outlook on this? Well, my outlook on this is that in the present system, there is a little bit of strain that occurs whenever you undergo basically what amounts to a rootkit reset, right? We’re looking at completely redesigning how nation-state e-commerce and economic activity actually happens across international boundaries. But when we look historically at the concept of tariffs, they are always beneficial when they are balanced and fair, and when there is not a co-optive globalist interest or a co-optive infrastructure that exists inside of those nation-states hampering their industries, and that is the regulatory bureaucracy.

So the process of excising the poison from the wound to talk about our economic situation here in the United States of America, the process of doing that is not exactly completely clean, but has a very good prognosis because of our industrial base, because of our ability to field manufacturing, grain, the resources of life. We now have directives from the administration to develop rare earth minerals and critical national security minerals. We’re moving into broadening of the financial landscape, which will help keep that engine all going. It all feeds into the same retail and financial and broad economic landscape that we’re creating, and that’s now going to translate itself or be translated, perhaps as a better way to say it, into fairness at the nation-state level.

Every nation-state brings something of value to the table, and they bring something different and unique. You may have certain types of a resource, say gold, for example, from one country or several countries, but there is always a specific country that has an extremely pure amount. Same with diamonds, same with emeralds, same with other precious and significant rare earth minerals and industrial minerals like thorium and silver and other things of that nature. So looking at what President Trump is now starting and has talked about doing for a long time with respect to tariffs, I’m looking at it as a reorientation from essentially an overly interconnected system at that sovereign nation-state level that essentially absolved and removed sovereignty and a return to a form of sovereignty while giving excuse to destroy that bureaucracy inside Western world nations, specifically inside Washington DC and London.

And this is how he’s going to absorb back those companies that have left the United States to have them come back here and start building specifically automotive companies, but so many different other types of companies are going to be coming back to the United States and starting to build their products here, correct? That is correct. And he’s also encouraging emerging industries and very large power players inside new ecosystems to base their operations and do the bulk of their production here in the USA. And that sort of feeds into exactly what we were talking about a moment ago, Nino.

If we’re going to transition basically from one support structure, from one supportive mechanism, for lack of a better term, for one lifeblood system to another lifeblood system, you cannot simply drain all of the blood out and then put the blood back in. It has to be a symbiotic movement gradually where a removal and an addition, essentially for lack of a better metaphor, has to occur simultaneously so that the organism does not know the difference. All right, SG, let’s go to Nino’s Corner.TV. I’ll see you over there, folks. Get over there right now. We’re going to be talking about the IRS becoming the ERS, how that’s happening now.

We’re going to be talking about the cartels in Mexico. Where did the military equipment from Afghanistan go? And we’re going to talk about Zelensky, the peace deal. Is it really a peace deal? Is something going to happen? We’re going to talk about all of that and more on Nino’s Corner.TV. I’ll see you over there. Is that right, SG? Sounds good, sir. God bless. [tr:trw].

See more of David Nino Rodriguez on their Public Channel and the MPN David Nino Rodriguez channel.