Now, in this image, you can see the impact a bird can have on a plane. It’s devastating, to say the least. And yet we’ve been led to believe that a plane is more powerful than structural steel, that a plane, meant to be lighter than air, can cut through steel like a hot knife through butter. Now, in this video, you can see that a bus cannot drive through a concrete wall.

So what makes people think that a plane can fly through structural steel? The US government wanted to test what would happen if a plane crashed into the concrete walls of a nuclear power station. The jet sets off, bolted to a track to prevent takeoff. It’s doing 500 miles an hour. The plane atomized. With the impact, it just disappears into dust. Only the tips of the wings escape total destruction.

But the wall, designed to move and absorb energy, did its job well when dealing with nuclear material. No test can ever be too drastic. As you can see in this footage, the fighter jet did even worse than the bus. It was vaporized into dust. The World Trade center wasn’t made of concrete, ladies and gentlemen. It was a building made with grade a structural steel. The engineers that built the World Trade center said it could have resisted multiple impacts from multiple planes.

Now, we’re going to play this FOIA nist footage from September 11. Watch what happens. Did you notice the cutscene? That’s how the footage was released, with a cutscene. In other words, they cut out the approach of the plane that hit the second tower. Let’s watch this again. Now, just before the cutscene, we can actually see the time this footage was taken. Nine four. If we look at the timeline for September 11, we can see that the second plane impacted at nine three.

So we’re supposed to believe that the person filming this video stopped recording just a few seconds before the impact and then started recording again. Unfortunately, we see this same tactic play out on multiple FOIA NIST videos from that very same day. In this video, they did it again. Bottom elevators exploded out the front of. Rotate them. The reason they’re cutting out the planes, ladies and gentlemen, is because it’s easier to cut out the plane than to put one in via CGI.

In this footage, we can see the wingtip disappear behind the corner of the building. And in this video, the entire wing disappears. Would it surprise you to know that the person that recorded this footage is the head of the MIT media lab? MIT level CGI, ladies and gentlemen. It’s either that or a mega bunker busting cruise missile with wings. Notice how quickly explosives can transform this 100 story column resembling the World Trade center, into dust.

This is exactly what happened on 911. High velocity explosives triggered to cascade in a visual way that makes it look like the building collapsed at freefall speeds. This is what happened on 911. Pay attention to these horizontal ejections. They’re a classic sign of a controlled demolition. In this footage, you can see the same types of ejections occurring right around the zone of the collapse. There are multiple examples of this.

It gets so sneaky that they let off a few charges as the second plane, flight 175, hits the south tower. It’s bait and switch, ladies and gentlemen. And as people were looking at the explosion rocking the south tower, other explosions were occurring in the other tower. Now, you can deny the evidence if you want to, but one thing is clear. Absolutely everything that has been broadcast since 911 has been fake news.

Fake news to keep people distracted from what really happened on that day. If you’re listening to this, you are the resistance close. .

See more of SettingBrushFires on their Public Channel and the MPN SettingBrushFires channel.