➡ Canadian Prepper talks about how NATO is preparing to discuss how to respond to Russia’s missile launch and a fire in Rostov von Don, a city crucial to Russia’s operations in Ukraine. Meanwhile, the US has given Ukraine permission to use certain weapon systems in the Kursk region. There are also talks of NATO planning preemptive strikes against Russia, and the possibility of France and Britain sending troops to Ukraine. Amidst these tensions, there are concerns about the potential for a nuclear war.

This is your day X World War 3 update. So, while NATO gets ready to convene its emergency meeting tomorrow to figure out what the plan is going to be to deal with Russia’s launch of an intermediate range ballistic missile, the Orezhnik, right now, Rostov von Don is on fire. Something in the city that is home to Russia’s Southern Command that oversees all of the Ukrainian operations in Rostov on Don is on fire. We don’t know if it’s a factory, is it an airport. Whatever it is, it seems to be burning brightly. And of course, Russia has become incredibly restrictive, just like Ukraine, with respect to the video footage that we can get of these events.

But it’s still far more generous than what we can get out of Ukraine. But presumably this was the consequence of an attack by Ukraine, possibly using NATO weapons and a combination of drones. Now, we do have another confirmed use of ATACMS cluster munitions inside the Kursk region on an airport in Kursk. This is at an airport near Kursk military airports. The Russians are saying that it was no longer in use. The Ukrainians are, I guess, saying otherwise. Time will tell. Regardless, John Kirby today has confirmed that in fact, the US has given green light to Ukraine to utilize these weapon systems inside the Kursk region.

And I think that there’s probably a bit of leeway for them to use it in the periphery in the Bryansk and possibly the Rostov on Don region as well. That’s what currently constitutes a deep strike. Now, lots of news today that has the Internet quite rattled. We’re going to try to shed some light on this information. We’re going to show you why it’s really nothing new. And this has been a part of a longstanding plan that is only now being put into practice. You see, as preppers, we are way ahead of this curve. Okay? And so a lot of this stuff that people are freaking out today about NATO talking about preemptive strikes against Russia, this is something I’ve been talking about day in, day out for a long time.

I haven’t made the dedicated video on it. But remember all of this from the Russian point of view. This is a probing operation. These are people who, in the worst case, upper estimates, lost 25 million people in World War II. They are currently surrounded by countries that they deem adversarial to them. And for good reason. With the history of the Cold War, they are seeing this encroachment onto their territory. Whether we want to say that the Russian invasion was good or not, from the Russian point of view, everything that NATO says it’s doing for defensive purposes, it’s doing for offensive purposes.

And that could easily be misread. So when NATO says we’re discussing the possibility of preemptive strikes against Russia for defensive purposes in that we won’t respond until they do first, well, they’re essentially saying that the plan is to do a decapitation strike against Russia’s nuclear forces. That’s what this is all about. Now we’re going to break that down in a little bit more detail if you don’t know what I’m talking about. Rob Bauer, the admiral of the chief of NATO basically said today that they are planning on potentially drawing up a plan. They already have the plan to do a retaliatory strike on Russia’s strategic assets using conventional weapons, meaning that if Russia were to attack some target inside NATO in response to Ukraine using NATO weapons to attack inside Russia, then this is what they’ll do.

They will proceed to potentially attacking Russia’s strategic sites. Now, they’ve already been doing this. They’ve been attacking the radars. They’ve been chipping away at Russia’s nuclear triad capability because of course, as all of Russia’s assets have been in range of these drones and now the atacms and the Storm Shadow and the Sculpt missiles, while Russia’s planes have been in range of those, they’ve had to pull them back, which creates a bit of a blind spot, especially considering they’ve had some of their radars destroyed or in some way compromised. That means that they cannot be on a optimal state of strategic readiness, which increases their hair trigger readiness in terms of, you know, their nuclear forces misinterpreting something that NATO is doing as potentially being offensive.

So we’ll talk a little bit about more of that in depth. We of course have France and Britain mulling sending troops to Ukraine. I mean, they were talking about this early last year. Everything that they’re talking about or that they hint at as being a hypothetical, it’s already been factored in. It’s just a matter of when they’re going to roll it out. We have the Department of Defense confirming indeed that the nuclear force posture has changed and that nuclear submarines are currently on a higher state of alert. Former retired General David Petraeus has reiterated his comments that if Russia attacks Ukraine with a nuclear weapon, that the United States will certainly respond by targeting all of Russia’s assets within Ukraine and possibly inside Russia as well.

I’m not sure where he gets his information from. I’m sure it’s at least partly credible. But yeah, I mean, it might be that crazy to start a nuclear war over Ukraine at this point. I would not put anything past him. We’re going to talk about Sebastian Gorka’s comments about the proposition that Trump is going to make that in fact could make the problem much worse. This is Trump’s counterterrorism pick. He essentially says something to the extent of Trump is going to say we’re going to arm Ukraine to the teeth, nuclear weapons, F35s in all, unless you come to some sort of agreement.

And that is going to be their strategy. Germany is building all kinds of bunkers and retrofitting and refurbishing bunkers of the Cold War era to meet the demands of their, what is it, 65, 80 million strong population. Lindsey Graham says the quiet part out loud once again, unabashedly talks about how they’re going to leverage Ukraine’s $7 trillion in resource wealth. The United States is going to be able to capitalize on this once Russia gets pushed out. Russians are talking about the possibility of striking the Aegis ashore site in I totally butchered that. I apologize to my Polish viewers, one in particular, who always rightly corrects me on my mispronunciation of Polish words.

Nonetheless, they are talking about the potential of striking this facility, which was initially claimed to have been designed to detect and shoot down Iranian missiles, as insane as that might be. Why would Iran ever want to go to war with all of Europe? It just makes no sense. Clearly cover for using those systems against Russia. But possibly, and this is where it gets incredibly concerning from a Russian point of view, is that this could just be an offensive system masquerading as a defensive one. Instead of using these launchers, of course, the missiles are concealed in these, these containers.

Instead of using them for defensive missiles, they could contain Tomahawk missiles, which could of course be nuclear tipped and used in a combination of F35 strikes buried in the deep Norwegian bunkers and the Finnish bunkers in combination doing some sort of decapitation strike on Russia, which is what all this Rob Bauer stuff is ultimately about. Pardon the brevity of the presentation here, guys. I’m trying to get all the information that you need, a total aggregate of World War three data in the shortest period of time without droning on about any particular topic in too much depth.

We have the Iranian Ayatollah today saying that the ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu is not enough. In fact, they are calling for the death of Netanyahu. We’re going to break down the prospect of a ceasefire today. We’re going to talk about why it’s highly unlikely to happen. And apparently because the ice caps are melting in Greenland. A new, not a new, an old Cold War era project which sought to build 2500 miles of subterranean city. 2500 miles. This was supposed to be one of NATO’s, you know, central command structures during the Cold War where I guess they would rebuild society or ride out the apocalypse.

Apparently because the ice is melting now, this place is now being revealed once again. And I’m hoping that I can encourage people to go and check out our recent video on drones. Show it some love. Because as per usual, anything of a practical nature that’s actually going to help people survive. STF people don’t care about. We just want to be entertained, right? We want to be mesmerized by our own demise. And that prompted me to write this on another social media platform. I’ve said, when you’ve been warning people about the inevitability of World War three for three years and they’re finally realizing it, while charlatans claim they knew all along, but you know, they won’t actually prepare and will lose interest at the first sign of reproach.

Maw. See, there’ll be a sigh of relief. Ah, it’s all right. Back to normalization, normalcy, Norman mode. Even though that rapprochement will only postpone the inevitable and they’ll be right back to losing their shit in a few weeks and, and this will repeat until the shit actually hits the fad. It’ll be this oscillating cycle of highs and lows and I’m really interested and I’m panicked and I’m out there panic buying too. Nothing is ever going to happen. That’s the panic prepper duality. The panic prepper cycle. You don’t want to be the panic prepper cycle. See, I’m calm and cool as a cucumber.

You wouldn’t believe it. Watching these word salad like videos where I’m trying to get all the information to you in the shortest period of time. But trust me, for me, I knew we were going to be here a year ago. So it’s just a matter of basically looking at my watch and saying, okay, yeah, we’re pretty much on schedule, so. Yeah, remember that movie Civil War? There’s a scene in Civil War where she’s sitting in the stadium with her protege photographer and they’re looking down this old abandoned stadium and the, you know, shtf Civil War world.

And there’s a tent city in the stadium. And they’re looking down almost as if to be entertained by the destruction of American society. And this is it. Okay. Understand that this is the last great Hollywood production. It’s reality. You’re watching it right now. This channel, in some ways, is a part of that, telling that story of our own demise. This is the ultimate form of final entertainment for mankind. And it’s watching the decay of our society, watching the deterioration and the destruction of our society in slow motion that is the final form of entertainment. The only way we can appease our quest for endless amounts of titillating dopamine is to get off on our own demise.

Isn’t that the most masochistic shit you ever heard in your life? Holy shit. We are so close, man. We are so close, baby. Wow. Take a look at this. All right. Mr. Rob Bauer. Mr. Rob Bauer, member? Flashlight on batteries. You need your flashlight on batteries. Make sure you have your flashlight with batteries. Never mind food or a place to squat in. Just your flashlight on batteries and radio. NATO military Committee Chairman Admiral Rob Barrow revealed that NATO is considering preemptive strikes on Russia with precision weapons in case of direct conflict. Now, people are misconstruing this, that NATO is preparing to do a preemptive strike.

And they’re right. That is what NATO is preparing to do. However, they’re talking about this in future tense. I don’t think it’s as future tense as Rob Bauer is making out here. The only thing tense, by the looks of things, is Rob Bauer because he knows the reality of the situation. He is saying that we must strike first. Targeting Russian missile launchers in disabling systems that could be used against us. Thus, this is a preemptive strike. This violates every possible red line of Russia’s nuclear doctrine. This would trigger all out nuclear war. This is exactly what you don’t want to do.

If you want to avoid Mutually Assured destruction and you want to escalate this thing gradually, you don’t seek to wipe out all of Russia’s offensive capability, okay? That would be an instantaneous end of the world scenario. So I really hope that they’re just bluffing. In fact, I think they are, because I think they know that. That the escalation ladder is far more nuanced than this all or none bullshit. What’s likely going to happen is that my theory is that Russia will eventually use some sort of tactical nuclear weapon in the capacity of trying to destroy underground facilities inside Ukraine, where most of the shit is happening.

That is going to likely trigger a response from NATO in some capacity, maybe enabling Ukraine to utilize more weapons. We talked yesterday about how the Jason’s missiles are en route. That’s only going to be a matter of time. They are a longer range platform, they’re more capable than the, than the ATACMS missiles. We could be even talking about Tomahawk missiles here. For, for all we know they’re even talking about giving Ukraine nuclear weapons now. That’s just talking at this point. So you know, it’s not like they’re going to give Ukraine nuclear weapons tomorrow. But again if they’re talking about any of this stuff it means that at some point they plan on rolling it out.

So Bauer explained NATO shift in strategy saying it would be wiser not to wait but to target the launch systems in Russia in case Russia attacks us. So the thinking is, is that maybe instead of using a nuclear weapon inside Ukraine, which is what I think they’ll do, NATO will be attacked by Russia. Quite possibly. The place where they may attack might be this Aegis Offshore or Aegis ashore site I should say in Redzikowa, Poland. And of course this could potentially be construed as an offensive weapon system which is why they might take it out. Putin is talking about mirroring.

So if we attack Russia with attack them Storm Shadow or Scalp missiles, attack one of their military bases, maybe they put some ordinance on Ramstein or on. What’s that place with the F35s in England. I think it’s. Look, I can’t remember what it is. It’s something, it starts with an L anyways. It could be any one of those places that they put down ordinance. However if they do this then it’s going to be an immediate Article 5 situation which would bring NATO into a conflict with the Russians. So for that reason I don’t think they’ll do that.

I think they’re going to keep it contained to Ukraine despite what General Petraeus has to say. The NATO Ukraine Council is currently meeting urgently tomorrow to address Russia’s use of the Orezhnik missile in Ukraine. We don’t know if NATO anticipated this use of, I guess you could say strategic weaponry in a non nuclear fashion before. We don’t know if they anticipated this step, this rung of the escalation ladder or not. I don’t think it’s the game changer that a lot of Russia bros think it is. It’s definitely a sophisticated move by Vladimir Putin because of course these things cannot be intercepted.

But they also don’t Come cheap, okay? This is going to cost immense amounts of money if you start using this conventionally. Mind you, if you’re already wasting millions of dollars and a lot of these missiles are just getting shot down trying to take out some of these facilities that, you know are the central nexus of Ukrainian industrial military operations, then if you can just throw down a couple of these things and guarantee that the place is going to be wiped out, even if it does cost you $50 million or whatever a crazy amount it’s going to cost, then it might be worth it.

Right? But I would be very skeptical of the idea that the Russians have an unlimited supply of these things. They’re going to be cannibalizing some other part of their military industry in order to be able to produce these things. And of course, it’s going to come at the expense of their strategic nuclear forces, which arguably is still more than sufficient to act as a valid nuclear deterrent. Bauer also talks about replenishing operational stocks of weapons. So, you know, the European war economy is in tow. Earlier on Monday, Bauer said NATO was changing its attitude toward the idea that the alliance is purely a defensive alliance whose members will sit and wait to be attacked.

He argued that in the event of a conflict with Russia, the bloc’s country should be the first to launch a combination of high precision strikes on its territory. Now, US And European officials are reportedly discussing the possibility of providing Ukraine with nuclear weapons. Now, considering Ukraine has F16s, and Lavrov about a year ago warned that this F16 platform was potentially a carry for nuclear weapons. We must surmise then that the nuclear weapons that they would likely have ever provide Ukraine with would have to be of the B61, a tactical nuke variant that would be compatible with Ukraine’s current fleet of F16s, one which will be growing in the near future.

Or we can presume maybe they’re going to be some sort of Tomahawk missile variant. Now, before anything like that were to happen, I think we’ll see massive escalation. And it appears as though NATO is doing and saying every possible thing they can in order to provoke the Russians before January 20th. Trump’s team has remained completely silent. They’re already making excuses for why he’s not saying anything. Oh, they’re working on a peace deal behind the scenes. And maybe it’s the case that they’re trying to maintain some strategic ambiguity by not having Trump say anything. Because quite frankly, when I show you what Sebastian Gorka says about what Trump’s policy may be, you’re probably going to get an understanding as to why Trump is saying nothing because it likely would be very escalatory.

Okay, so potential European troop deployment in Ukraine, France and UK have resumed conversations about deploying troops or private military contractors to Ukraine. Of course, they say, or there’s already tons of NATO troops. There’s tons of evidence of NATO troops fighting in the Kursk region. Never mind Ukraine. I mean, there’s been NATO troops there all throughout this thing. They’ve been getting murked left and right by Kinzhal missiles. We know that for a fact. So this is really nothing new. These are just sheep dip troops, which is basically a term to denote when you basically give early discharge to a troop and you say, hey, how would you like a job as a mercenary? And that’s how the story goes.

This is largely driven by concerns that U.S. support for Ukraine may decrease after the inauguration of Donald Trump. Well, I don’t think so. I think it’s actually going to ramp up more than people realize. But you’re not going to hear about it because I do believe Trump is going to make good on a lot of his domestic promises, which will likely assuage a lot of people who have a problem with his foreign policy. At the end of the day, people aren’t going to be questioning 50 billion, another 50 billion to Ukraine if everything is more or less being addressed on the home front.

Whether it’s actually addressed and the results or what people expect is another question. But understand that I think the domestic issues, especially the civil unrest that could arise from the dragnet of trying to deport all the immigrants, and then you got the transgenders that are being banned from the military. There’s going to be all kinds of protests, okay? Civil unrest that’s going to be preoccupying all of the mainstream media networks. So a lot of this stuff is just going to fade into the background, with the exception of the hardcores who are paying attention to it on a daily basis because we understand that the stakes are very high.

This cooperation comes in light of fears that the US May begin to scale back its involvement in Ukraine, which I don’t know. I don’t think they will. Following British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s visit to France on November 11, talks between the UK and France have picked up once again. According to Vladimir Putin, he’s confirmed that mass production of the Oreshnik missile system is underway following its successful first combat use against Ukraine’s Yuzhmask defense facility. Now, again, something that people are not giving enough attention to with this strike number one, Putin is calling it a test, which you’re not doing a test on a weapon system like this that has a great possibility for error in terms of it missing its target in a densely population related region like Dnieper Petrovsk.

You would not use it if you were not 110% sure that it wasn’t going to rain down on a civilian area. Could you imagine if this thing was off by a few hundred meters and just happened to fall dead in the center of Dnieper Petrovsk and hit rain down on a bunch of, you know, civilians? It could have been a completely different story. So I think what’s not getting enough attention with yes, there’s a devastating capability, there’s a potential nuclear capability, it cannot be intercepted, but the precision, the accuracy of the strike, I think that is what is so terrifying to NATO and which is why they’re calling an emergency meeting.

According to Putin, the missile, a hypersonic medium range weapon, is designed for high precision strikes and is part of Russia’s modern defense initiatives. Again, they’re saying it’s a new weapon system. It seems to be derived from multiple different concepts from various ICBM type platforms. But the Russians are saying it’s a brand new. There’s plenty of breakdowns and exposes on the actual missile itself. Going to try to bring on an expert to talk about that in the not so distant future. In addition to Bauer’s threats to Russia, he’s also saying that NATO countries need to prepare for wartime scenarios, stressing the importance of diversifying supply chains and reducing dependency on countries like Russia and China.

And this is where our adversaries excel because they are already sanctioned to hell, so they have been forced to be self sufficient. Right. You know, it’s almost like a metaphor for preppers in the relationship with the government and how the government sanctions us when we don’t partake in society. It actually makes us stronger. It forces us to create our own power grid, grow our own food, you know, pump our own water out of the ground. And that’s exactly what just getting a call here. And that’s exactly the disadvantage that’s come from enjoying all the spoils of globalization.

While your adversaries have essentially been ostracized by the developed world, they’ve now had their industrial processes, largely all inclusive, developed in their society, reliant maybe only on a few other countries for various parts and different components that they can get from countries by circumventing the sanctions. But he is basically saying that they need to sever their military dependency on countries like China and understand that commercial decisions of the sort can have strategic consequences for national security. He further warned, while it may be the military who wins battles, it’s the economy that wins wars. He urged businesses to adjust their production and distribution lines to ensure critical services and goods remain unaffected by geopolitical tensions.

I don’t know if there’s going to be some sort of mandate handed down by these governments to ensure that something tangible comes from that advice. It’s very likely that because of the decentralized nature of Western societies and alliances in general, the NATO alliance, well, it’s a lot of rich countries that come together. It’s not centralized in the sense that all countries have to be completely in sync and interoperable. And this is where a smaller country like Russia that is homogenized, that is, you know, omnibus, all working towards one common goal. This is where even having a small population and a much smaller gdp, if you have a homogenous society with, you know, homogeneous ideology and religion and just culture, you can achieve a lot more than a mishmash of various different countries doing their own thing, prioritizing their own interests, and only kind of kicking in whatever.

You know, the leftovers are for the collective good. It’s not really a utilitarian enterprise. Germany is expanding its shelter building. Okay, so in response to heightened security concerns, Germany plans to expand civilian shelters, converting basements, car parks, and subway stations into protective spaces. The aim is to increase shelter capacity from 480,000 to up to 5,000 in key locations. So I believe they had. From 480. Yeah, I believe they had something like. Their capacity is greatly diminished since the Cold War, put it that way. So now they’re scrambling to go underground, which seems insane that you would start these kind of wars and only now be preparing for this.

You know, this is why Europe really needs the Russian boogeyman in order to rekindle its dwindling military infrastructure. You need Russia to attack you, which is why I think they’re doing everything they possibly can. They just want Russia to attack them a little bit, you know, to get the population scared enough to justify trillions in military industrially complex spending over the next decade or so. That. That’s pretty much what’s going on. Okay. Okay, here’s what Rob Bauer had to say. Let’s see here. Did I already talk about this guy? Did he already. I can’t remember if I even showed you guys this.

Either way, we’ll talk about it again. It’s smarter not only to do that, but also to attack the archer that is in Russia if Russia attacks us. The old saying, attack the archer, not the arrows. So you need to have a combination of deep precision strike with which you can take out the weapon systems that are used to attack us. And of course, because we’re a defensive alliance, we will have to take the first blow. Sure you will. So sure you’re a defensive alliance, Rob. Sure, Russia will start the conflict. Think of it. You’re the Russians, right? You’re surrounded by NATO countries who have F35s parked in bunkers.

Finland, the most bunker dense country in Northern Europe, okay, Right along your borders, you share a massive border. You have the Baltic States, Germany, getting ready to mobilize divisions of soldiers to go into the Baltics. You have what’s going on in Poland with the early warning radar system that you don’t know if that’s just masquerading for Tomahawk missiles, offensive weapons. You have what’s going on in Ukraine. They’re talking about putting NATO troops, nuclear weapons, and you just lost 25 million people in World War II. Worst case, upper estimate. Okay, now imagine your Russians for a second.

I know we think we’re the good guys, we think we’re the West. We can do nothing wrong. Democracy, rah, rah. We’ve been inculcated with this idea that we’re the good guys from the get go. But understand that the other side of the world doesn’t view us that way and they are paranoid as all hell that we’re going to do a decapitation strike on them. And why would Vladimir Putin think otherwise at this point in time? I mean, he’d be stupid not to. You’d be, you’d be questioning their intellectual capacity if he wasn’t worried about being attacked constantly by this coalition of 32 countries that continuously got closer to their border, okay, and have sanctioned them and blah, blah, blah, because we are not going to attack Russia out of nothing.

So, yeah, we will need more air defense. That’s one of the lessons. So the things he’s talking about, you know, on the positive side, he’s talking about things that are going to take years to do. But I wonder if they don’t have some plan up their sleeve or, you know, if they aren’t just trying to prime the population to accept what’s coming, what could be coming in short order if things spiral out of control really fast. I don’t believe in the mutually assured destruction hypothesis. I don’t believe that this thing is going to escalate immediately. What I fear the most as a prepper is the shock is the panic after the first nuke is used and the ripple effects throughout society.

Now, fortunately, we live in such a fickle world where people are just going from one thing to the next, that I actually think you could tell people that aliens, there’s proof that aliens, you can put the alien on the tv and within a week, you know, people would just be back to stuff in their face with junk food and playing video games. Like, you know, we get bored of shit so easily nowadays that you could tell people a tactical nuke went off immediately. People would be flooding the Internet buying survival food, buying gas masks. Within a week nowadays, it would fizzle out.

And that’s when we enter the real dangerous territory. Because once you’ve normalized the use of tactical nuclear weapons. And it’s coming. Okay? It is, absolutely. We are in an irrevocable situation that there’s no way out of this situation unless somebody wins. And it’s a much different environment than the Cold War. There’s so many other variables, you know, AI and autonomous weaponry and this new type of, you know, borderline unconventional weaponry that can be utilized, that changes the whole equation as to how this thing might play out. So I actually do believe that we could see the normalization of low yield tactical nuclear weapons.

And people are going to acquiesce to that reality with relative ease. It’s going to be a shock at the beginning. And that’s the panic that I’m concerned about. Because in that panicked haste, that could be when mistakes get made. I think the only way we go to mutually assured destruction is by accident. But once you cross that Rubicon into the use of tactical nuclear weapons, the possibility for accidents, you know, exponentially increases. David Petraeus thinks that the US Is going to destroy all because the US is, you know, omnipotent. They can. They can do whatever they want.

We don’t know that yet. I mean, we don’t know what the F30, what F35s, F22s. I mean, if Israel can’t show us any evidence that they’ve destroyed Iranian air defense with all of their capability, then I’m not holding my hopes out for this F35 business. All right? I’m just saying we’ve never seen these things tested against a peer adversary. Let’s see what Sebastian Gorka has to say about the sitch. This is the counterterrorism cabinet. Pick from Trump. I’ll give one tip away that the President has mentioned he will say to that murderous former KGB colonel, that thug who runs the Russian Federation, you will negotiate now or the aid that we have given to Ukraine thus far will look like peanuts.

That’s how he will force those gentlemen to come to an arrangement that stops the bloodshed. So now it makes sense why they’re talking about sending troops and why they’re talking about providing nuclear weapons. Ukraine already has the delivery platform for the tactical nuclear weapons. And if they have a license now to use a weapon system that can still defeat. Not always. Russia can shoot down all of the missiles, scalp Storm Shadow ATACMs, but it’s harder for them to shoot down than the Ukrainian drones. So there’s a greater possibility that Ukraine can use these assets against Russia’s strategic targets, even like nuclear power plants, like the Kursk nuclear power plant they could potentially use.

And ATACMS against, although I’m sure they would be still in big trouble. Let’s see what Lindsey Graham has to say. He has a great idea to revitalize the American economy only at the expense of an entire generation of Ukrainians. Let’s see what he has to say about money. People don’t talk much about it, but you know, the richest country in all of Europe for rare earth minerals is Ukraine. Two to seven trillion dollars worth of minerals that are rare earth minerals. Very relevant that they’re 21st. He thinks about that all night. In between thoughts of the paper boy, you know, he’s thinking about the paper boy at night.

Century Ukraine’s ready to do a deal with us, not the Russians. So it’s in our interest to make sure that Russia doesn’t take over the place. It’s the breadbasket of really the developing world. 50% of all the food, I don’t know who want to be eaten. Ukraine wheat when it’s contaminated with all the frickin depleted uranium and whatever else is going to be in there at this point in time. That cannot be a healthy bread basket. But let’s carry on going to Africa comes out of Ukraine. We can make money and have an economic relationship with Ukraine to be very beneficial to us with peace.

So Donald Trump’s going to do a deal to get our money back to enrich ourselves with air, rare earth minerals. A good deal for Ukraine and us. And he’s going to bring peace. And Biden’s been a disaster when it comes to. At least he’s being honest, you know what I’m saying? You gotta hand something to lg. He’s being honest, man, you know he’s telling us it’s about money. That’s what all wars. All wars are, resource wars. So this. Yeah, I already talked about this enough, I think. So this is the system. This is the vertical launch system that is used in conjunction with this Aegis Ashore site.

But the Russians don’t know, and I can’t remember whose presentation I lifted this from. It was one that I watched over the weekend. So, no, I did not make this slide. I can’t take credit. In fact, I’m going to try to get the guy on the channel who made these slides. He seems to know his stuff. He also predicts that the Ukrainians may attack the Kursk nuclear power plant, although he’s not the first one to have that idea. He goes into a bit of depth about what that might actually entail. So the vertical launch system, this.

I guess the missiles are deposited into the system with this container thing. And so they don’t know what kinds of missiles are in there. So in theory, they could be putting an offensive missile with a nuclear warhead on there. And this is what the Russians don’t know. This is why this might be one of the prime targets that goes first if there was, you know, Russian retaliation. Although I don’t. I don’t understand. Like, the Russians would only do this if. Because this is a strategic target through and through. I’m sure it’s possibly assisting Ukraine in some capacity.

But I think the Russians would. I don’t think they would go this far immediately. They would nuke Ukraine, I think, before they took out this location. Because this would be, you know, a major breach of Article 5. Right. But on the flip side, this is the equivalent of us striking their radars or leveraging our proxy Ukraine to strike their radars. Now, here’s what’s going on in the Middle east. Okay? So Iran is expanding its uranium enrichment program in response to the International Atomic Energy Agency resolution. They plan to operate a substantial number of advanced uranium centrifuges.

And they immediately started this right after the IAEA Board of Governors passed a resolution that was critical of its nuclear program. They call the resolution confrontational and politically motivated, but reiterated its commitment to cooperate with the IAEA within the framework of international agreements. They emphasize the right to expand its nuclear program while maintaining cooperation with the iaea. So this is bad. This is bad because in addition to that, in this speech by the Ayatollah, they are essentially chanting, death to Netanyahu. Now, if you know what’s happened in Netanyahu in the last few days, there was a leak that alleges to disclose all the names of various Mossad agents, as well as a variety of different Mossad secrets.

Some leaked audio and video footage of Netanyahu that I’ll show you in a moment. In addition to that, there is concern that if there is a ceasefire, that essentially he is going to be held to account. You’re going to see the resurrection of this civil unrest inside Israel. And that essentially, I don’t think that there’s both sides. There’s so much intransigence there that it’s impossible for a ceasefire to hold for a significant period of time when, for a variety of reasons, that if I have time, I’ll get into it. Just. It’s very unlikely for any ceasefire to stick when you have the Ayatollah, like he is in this video calling for Netanyahu’s assassination, you know, and you have a cabinet full of Israeli hawks en route on January 20th.

I mean, forget about it. And you have true promise. Three, which, according to some Iranian sources, could literally happen any day now. Here’s what they’re chanting. This is all of the Iranian top brass in one room, okay? So the fact that they’re congregating like this at all shows that they’re not or they have confidence in their defense systems. But some people are speculating that there could be a attempt to do a decapitation strike in the same way it was done with Hezbollah, but on Iran. So I guess we’ll have to see when it comes to ceasefires, this is a great contrast of videos here.

So on the one side, on the left side, you have Gaddafi, okay? And now this is what Gaddafi said. We all know what happened to him. He said the following. They want to establish a Zionist empire on Arab lands. Don’t believe their talk about peace. He says it’s deception and lying to the masses. They want to establish a Zionist empire on Arab lands. Now, on the other side, we have a leaked video. Netanyahu. And here’s what he has to say, okay? Talking about the subterfuge, the deception, the skullduggery leveraged by the Israeli leadership in order to deceive its enemies.

Here’s what he has to say. And this is why I have serious doubts that Hezbollah is taking this ceasefire seriously at all. He says, we have neighbors here, sworn enemies. I’m constantly passing them messages. I confuse them, mislead them, lie to them, and then hit them over their heads. So essentially saying, we cannot be trusted at all. This is confidential and can’t be leaked. Okay. Okay. Well, I guess it got leaked. Wow. Did you guys know that in the Arctic there was a project called Project Ice Worm? NASA discovers Camp Century a NASA Gulfstream 3 aircraft during a 2024 survey of Greenland’s ice sheet revealed images of the abandoned Camp Century military base, which was built during the Cold War.

Underneath this, they had planned on doing something called Project Ice Worm. The base was the site of a secret US plan to build 2500 miles of tunnels to launch nuclear missiles at The Soviet Union. 2500 miles of tunnels. Now, if they didn’t do it here in full, imagine what they have that we don’t know about. Just really, we’re not talking Raven Rock. I think Raven Rock, Cheyenne Mountain, I think that’s all, you know, that’s all old news. The real, especially with the drilling technology they have today and with Elon Musk’s boring company as a convenient front, I think that they probably have some very extensive and sophisticated underground complexes that we can’t even imagine.

I would not doubt. I’m not really going to get into this because this, you know, you could do a whole presentation on just this very thing and there’s probably, you know, way better. There’s documentaries on this particular site as well if you want to go and check them out. I said that I might, if I had time, go into more depth about the ceasefire thing. So here’s my rationale as to why the ceasefire is just okay. And even if it starts, it’s not going to last long. As soon as Hezbollah’s rocket stop protests will erupt at the Knesset and Bibby’s house.

He needs people hiding in bunkers, not resisting in the streets. Meanwhile, hawks to the other side are pushing him to escalate the conflict. So, well, you have a lot of people who I’d say the majority of the Israeli population does want peace, but you have these hawks, these hardline right wingers within the Knesset who want Netanyahu to go all the way, you know, eradicate Hamas, eradicate Hezbollah. On the flip side, you have a bunch of people who don’t like Bibis. And as soon as the shelling stops, they’re going to come out from the bunkers and they’re going to start to rally in protests and it’s going to be civil war in Israel all over again.

Thus, the incentive is to escalate and not have a ceasefire. Okay, number two, we have the Israelis consistently use this tactic, as I recently indicated, inciting temporary calm to try to floss out their adversaries out of hiding. If Hezbollah falls for this trick again, then I guess Darwin do them. Part number three. An entire cabinet of pro Israeli war hawks is just weeks away from entering the White House. So maybe this is trying to forestall an escalation in the conflict, to do Biden a favor. Maybe for all of the support, the secret support that he’s given the Israelis over the last year and a half, it could be that it could just be waiting for Trump to get back into office to really, you know, put the pedal to the metal and play pretend for a while.

So to give their soldiers some rest. Because right now, inside Lebanon, contrary to what you’re hearing in the mainstream media, Israel is getting its ass handed to it on the ground whenever it has to go mono Armano with a near peer adversary that has advanced weapon systems and they’re trying to do this ground invasion, they just get their ass kicked, okay? The only thing they can really do is bomb, you know, bomb with impunity. And even when they have overwhelming technological superiority on the ground, and this is nothing that is unique to the Israelis, we see this in the Russian Ukraine conflict, okay? So even though Russia has overwhelming force and technology, they still can’t push the Ukrainians back.

So the same thing is just true in Hezbollah. While it’s true that Hezbollah is incurring more casualties, on the whole, generally speaking, Israel is experiencing a traditional rate that it’s not accustomed to and it doesn’t have the will to fight that. A lot of these, you know, especially when you’re, you know, there’s few people who are as radically ideologically driven to fight on the side of the Israelis, not nearly as many as there are on the opposing side, in which martyrdom for them is, you know, seen as a gift. Okay? It’s, it’s seen as the highest, you know, most sought after way to die is to go out as a martyr fighting for your country, which can’t be said for the Israeli side, okay? Iran has just wrapped up in uranium enrichment.

It’s called for BB’s death. And they’re in the process of hyping up Operation True Promise three, which could happen any day now. Now, the conditions of the ceasefire itself seem absurd. I haven’t even talked about those because they’re so absurd. But one thing in particular is that Hezbollah is going to leave south of the Litany river and they’re going to demilitarize south of the Litany river, and that the Lebanese military and the UN are going to come in in place of Hezbollah. Okay? So this is Something. This is a non starter, it seems. So I think Hezbollah is just playing along with this.

They know long term there’s not going to be a ceasefire, but they’re going to play pretend. They’re going to play along, see what happens, because they know what happened last time they played into this idea of a ceasefire. They got decapitated. Right. I would encourage you guys go check out my recent video about drones. We do a lot of blue strip videos here. If you think that all I talk about is, you know, day X and World War Three, day in and day out, it’s probably because either you’re not getting notified to those other blue strip style videos or you’re seeing them and you’re just not clicking on them because secretly you really just want to be amused and mesmerized by our own demise as opposed to actually taking the practical steps that you need in order to get prepared.

I would say that the DJI Neo drone is a good starter drone. It’s one of the most cost effective. It will work. Contrary to popular belief, without the Internet, you don’t need the Internet for it to work. Yes, any electronics. Spare me, the EMP is going to fry all the electronics. If I had a dollar for every time anytime I reviewed an electronics device, someone came on and the first thing they wrote was, that’s not going to work. If electromagnetic pulse fries it, I’d be rich, man. I really would be rich. You know, most people, they make a joke, they say, well, I’d have enough money to, you know, take an Uber across town.

I actually would be rich if I had a dollar for every time somebody said that. Put it in a Farrier cage, forget about it. Are the Chinese probably recording everything about you? Sure. But, you know, we’ll cross that bridge when we get there. All right? The fact is, they make the best drones in the world. There are other drones, like the Autel Line that we’re going to show you in a bit that are a bit more jailbroke and don’t require signing your life away. But at the end of the day, I mean, you know, the capability that it affords you for the minimal investment relative to what it used to cost is negligible in terms of what it allows you.

Like, imagine you’re. You’re stuck in the woods and you’re lost. If you can put a bird up in the air, get your bearings that way, not have to waste time hiking up to the nearest mountain with the limited calories you have, you know, that’s a potential lifesaver in a variety of different situations in terms of security and surveillance. I use a drone. I’m not lying. At least once every two days on my property to surveil and just to see what’s going on, to see where the animals are at. It’s so incredibly useful. Don’t be a dinosaur.

They’re super easy to use. I don’t get sponsored by dji. Okay? I do these videos because I like sharing the information with you guys. Even though these videos don’t get a lot of views, they cost me a lot of money to make, but I do it for the love of just doing it and, you know, hopefully bringing you products that are going to help you out. Genuinely help out people who are serious about prepping and not just here for amusement. All right, guys, I got to get going. Thanks.
[tr:tra].

See more of Canadian Prepper on their Public Channel and the MPN Canadian Prepper channel.