➡ The speaker warns about the potential dangers of Bitcoin, suggesting it could be a tool for control by powerful entities. They argue that Bitcoin, despite being presented as a decentralized currency, is becoming a strategic reserve for the elite. The speaker also suggests that Bitcoin might have been created by artificial intelligence (AI) to encourage more digital infrastructure, giving AI more control. They advise listeners to invest in tangible assets like gold instead of digital currencies.
➡ This text discusses the relationship between big tech companies and intelligence agencies, suggesting that many tech giants were established with the help of these agencies. It also mentions how these companies have been involved in surveillance and data collection, often sharing this information with intelligence agencies. The text also touches on the influence of these tech companies in politics and their connections to controversial figures. Lastly, it discusses the shift of economies like Saudi Arabia towards a post-oil economy and the potential implications of this change.
➡ The U.S. has often defended the dollar’s status as the global reserve currency, even going to war for it. This has led to instability and economic warfare in countries like Argentina and Lebanon. The situation in Argentina, for example, is a result of financial policies adopted during its military dictatorship and neoliberal leadership in the 90s. The U.S. and other entities have exploited these situations, leading to resource grabs and debt for land swaps, which have further destabilized these countries.

Shall we? December 2017. I had to drive somebody else’s car for a minute or two today. I had to move it. And when I turned the car on, talk radio was on talk radio, AM radio, the the pinnacle of being an educated New World order citizen. And the first thing that I heard was some accountant or Wall street guy explaining how bitcoin was going to be, to be or was already more valuable than gold. Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding. There’s the trick. Bitcoin’s gonna be more valuable than gold. Gold, the one thing, for whatever reason it is, for whatever reason has stood through time immemorial.

It’s what they make. Everything that’s made to do incredible or unbelievably extreme things is made of had everything to do with the Egyptians for whatever reason the that are running our world right now because we’re just sitting back and doing nothing for the most part, or everyone else is just ignoring it. But I digress. The that are running the world right now take all their cues and pay serious homage to the Egyptians. The pyramid, so forth and so on. So for whatever reason, gold was incredibly important to the Egyptians. From what they tell us and from what we can find out, they’re trying to get the last little bits of gold away.

They’ve already got your house. You’ll never own your property because of property taxes. We’ll never own anything. And they want all of it. They want every single last bit of it. And bitcoin is how they’re going to do it. That have at their inception some sort of national security state component that have become widely adopted. Have a carrot in a stick phase. And I think the Internet has had a very long carrot phase. But if you go and look at the, the origins really of the Internet in the 90s, it was a lot of framing it as decentralized and all of this and getting people on it, getting people to trust it and become dependent on it, which now the world is especially economically.

And then you, you know, oh, you want access to the Internet, you have to use our digital ID system or our, you know, our programmable surveillable money system, etc. Like that is the stick that we all kind of know is going to come at some point, right? Because it’s centralized through the isp. So you want access to the Internet, you have to go through an ISP. And how many meaningfully decentralized, freedom loving ISPs are there? Well, not many. And for places that didn’t really have access to an ISP before, they’re all being herded onto starlink, which is basically an extension of the U.S.

military. Right. And so I think, you know, in addition to that being the case. Right. I think it was true for things like bitcoin, which was framed as initially decentralized freedom money. Did it have that potential? Just as the Internet had that potential at one point? Sure. But now it’s being herded into not being a medium of exchange, which is the only use case, in my opinion, that would allow it to be any sort of freedom money. And it’s moving into, you know, strategic reserve asset for Larry Fink and, you know, the oligarchy and combining it with stable coins and all of that makes it a Norwellian system.

That’s no good. So I’ve been warning you for nine years about this time, and it’s finally here. If you were smart, you’d get your money out of the bank, because your money in the bank to you is only ones and zeros. And it can be taken away at any given moment. Turn your 401k and your IRA into gold and have it shipped to your house so you’re actually holding it. We don’t know how long it’s going to take when they finally pull the last card, but the last card is coming. I’ve been warning about this for nine years.

You see what I’m saying? Bitcoin is more valuable than gold. That’s right. That’s right. Because for most people, owning gold means they own a piece of paper that some guy says in a bank someplace that you’re not allowed to go to. You own gold. It’s in your portfolio. Yeah. Smart people have gold in their hand, and when they buy gold, they test gold to make sure gold is gold. Because one of the main people that was screwing people over was the mint U. S. Treasury. You know what I’m saying? Unbelievable. Bitcoin, stay away from it. Unless you plan on buying a shitload in one week and flipping it that same week and getting out and turning it into tangible.

Other than that, you’re playing right into their design. Bitcoin is exactly, exactly the one world currency at least. No good for freedom. Depends on who you’re talking about, I guess. And so I think AI Is ultimately going to go in that same direction and they’re going to try to trick it in. Like it’s. We have no control over it. It’s. It’s just organic. It’s happening on its own. No one knows. It’s just crazy. It’s going to be worth Ridiculous amounts of money. No matter what, no one knows where it came from. Oh, get the. Come on, man.

The ex. Same people that funded everything that this is all allegedly coming from are the exact same people that have always been the same people. Nothing changes, man. Nothing new under the sun. I warned you years ago that the. The inventor of bitcoin was a lie. And then suddenly the proof actually came out to back me up. But the main reason I’m here is to clear my name that I have nothing to do with bitcoin, nothing to do with developing. I was just an engineer doing something else. And if you look at the time span, 2001, when it was supposed to be developed, I wasn’t there.

I was working for the government through contracting company. That’s not me. I never communicated with bitcoins. Leah wrote all this. 2010 to 2000. I was at home. I wasn’t working for anybody. I just believe that somebody put that fictitious name in there. Satoshi Nakamoto. And bitcoin or bitcoin. Do you think? I’ve listened. I’ve listened to Quinn Michaels. I’ve listened to all the experts. I’ve listened and listened and listened, and this is what I’ve come up with. I’ve spoken to a couple of other YouTube creators that you guys all know very well, and we’ve come to a consensus, and this is my opinion and my opinion only.

What is bitcoin? Is it the mark of the beast? Is it the DNA of AI? Is it the way we’re going? Is it the one world currency? Is it run by a central bank? Bitcoin? Nobody knows who created it, and chances are it was created by an AI. Why would an AI Something that doesn’t even live in the physical world, the way we know of it, that doesn’t have any material wants, that doesn’t need a car, a house, is. Why would AI create a. A currency? AI has created currency that is keeping people building AI does that make any sense? It’s a scam.

It’s fishing. AI Is using this like bait that a fisherman uses to catch a fish. AI Created bitcoin in order to keep making more platforms for AI to control the physical world. Does that make sense? AI Created a currency that people look at and see as the wave of the future. And they want to put all their time and energy into bitcoin and getting other people to use Bitcoin, which means more computers, more platforms, more access to all the computers. And of course, something we were completely unaware of back then in 2017, was data centers. We currently have 4017 data centers in the United States.

And the number is going up every day. And every data center that they get up and running instantly starts siphoning off all the electricity that Americans need and all the water that humans need. And they don’t care. And they’re not paying for the water or electricity, much like everything else, much like Tesla, much like SpaceX, much like everything else. The government is subsidizing it, which means all those taxes they’re ripping away from you every single week is paying for our own demise. But we didn’t know that back in 2017. Like u. S. Intelligence, if you go back to the very beginning, and there’s even CIA, like, deputy directors that have said that it was all Wall street people at the beginning.

It was Wall street lawyers, it was Wall street bankers. And since that point, from the genesis of the CIA, there’s been revolving doors between CIA and wall street that have continued up until today. And really, you could look at the CIA as a public private enterprise. In some sense it’s a public security agency, but it’s more or less function throughout its history as wall street secret police. That’s why its earliest coups, for example, like its first coup in Guatemala, that was done on behalf of united fruit, you know, a major multinational corporation headquartered in the United States, which, interestingly enough, was later acquired by Leon black’s father and then Leslie wetzner’s business mentor.

I know that name. Yeah. And then you also have, you know, like the coup in Iran over, like, anglo american oil, like them losing their. Their holdings there. The coup in 1973 in Chile, you can argue it was because of efforts to nationalize copper and all these largely western mining companies losing out. And then they come in and do a coup and what have you. They’re. It’s really been symbiotic for some time. And I think, you know, as we moved into the information age, the CIA saw an opportunity. Well, let me back up a little bit.

The Internet from the very beginning was, you know, originally started as arpanet, you know, a project of the pentagon. And for anyone that really wants to know about that history, I would highly recommend the book surveillance valley by Yasha levine. It was essentially created in Vietnam as a counterinsurgency program. That was the goal of it by the same people that were involved in things like the phoenix program, which was the first instance of, you know, military intelligence, at least US Military intelligence, using databases to come up with names of dissidents and then assassinating Them and a lot of them weren’t actually dissidents, like suspected dissidents or neighbors of dissidents and all of this stuff.

And then from Phoenix program it goes, you know, all these CIA backed dictatorships like you know, Pinochet and Chile for example, you know, Operation Condor use the exact same system. And they’ve been building these systems with the Internet even before the modern Internet as we use it now existed. And so a lot of these early, there were efforts early on to king make the companies who would come to dominate the Internet. And that has happened. It’s just a matter of public record. If you look at the biggest companies in big tech, you know, I’ve done work about how Facebook was essentially launched as a resurrection of a failed DARPA program called Lifelog by the same person that resurrected the failed DARPA program, Total Information Awareness, one of the most insane surveillance proposals ever in US history.

Resurrected as Palantir. You can thank Peter Thiel for that. Co founder of, of PayPal and a lot of these other companies that have become huge. Google, for example. You know, there’s a good article by Nafez Ahmed written on the by insert when he published at Insurge Intelligence called How the CIA made Google. If you look at a lot of these companies, you will find intelligence agencies at the beginning. Palantir I mentioned earlier, took in Q Tel, developed very closely with the CIA. It began at PayPal. It’s a PayPal spin off. Palantir is Oracle, another huge company in Silicon Valley.

Larry Ellison, before he started Oracle, was working on Project Oracle at the CIA on databases and was basically was the infrastructure for Oracle as we know it now. A lot of these, there’s been a lot of, you know, symbiosis between intelligence agencies and these big companies for a long time. And they couldn’t have done it without venture capital. And that’s arguably why the CIA launched in Q Tel in the late 90s, because they wanted to become big players in Silicon Valley. Because when you decide you know who the kingmakers are, well, there’s a lot of things actually to be said about that.

So what I mentioned earlier about like Total Information Awareness, you know, this is a program that was just deemed so insane in the early 2000s that essentially every mainstream media publication railed against it and rights groups, group railed against it. But then when they relaunched the same program essentially as a private entity, as a private sector sector entity, no one complained. And so the CIA for a long time and other intelligence agencies have followed this exact playbook. Specifically Israeli intelligence. When you move into the private sector, you can get away with a lot more than you can in the public sector, sometimes depending on what you’re trying to do.

And so there have been efforts to do that, you know, I would argue, for a very long time. And if you look at how these big tech companies have develop and you know, for example, revelations from the Snowden Leaks, just like how the extent to which these private companies, you know, how much of your data that they’re selling or passing to US Intelligence for warrantless surveillance, I mean, they’ve been collaborators of this for a very, very long time. And I think there really hasn’t been enough scrutiny of that. And I would really argue that a lot of these companies operate more often than not as intelligence fronts.

And it’s kind of gotten to the point too where in US specific, the people behind these very big tech, the biggest of the big tech companies are also the main donors to the two US political parties. You know, you have like Peter Thiel on the Republican side, you have Reid Hoffman on the Democrat side and Eric Schmidt on the Democrat side. I mean, you know, they fund our politicians and they dominate our private sector infrastructure, especially as we’ve been forced to be more online, specifically since the COVID era. And the goal is to have things digitalized even further and have it all beyond these people’s systems and have us become completely dependent on their infrastructure.

And these people are in bed with intelligence. And even aside from the intelligence connections, you know, they, they have a lot of dirty laundry. Why did Jeffrey Epstein have connections with almost every big tech oligarch in the United States? I mean, not enough people have bothered to ask that question. Why were so many of them subpoenaed during the JP Morgan Epstein case in the US Virgin Islands that ended up being settled. I forget how much JP Morgan paid to make it all go away, but a lot of money, I would add about like the, the tether play, I think it’s, I think it’s really similar, but like in reverse of like what Elon Musk is, is doing.

So tether started off with money, right? With the stable coin, another going into satellites and brain chips. Musk is doing brain chips and satellites and he took over his social network, arguably for the user data. And now he’s turning, or has made it very explicit his intentions to turn Twitter X into a bank that he hopes to be half of the financial system. Why is that happening? It’s very odd. And then when you consider all these like PayPal link ups, of course Musk being a co founder of PayPal, it’s all very like, yeah. So like on that note, a lot of the talking points by prominent bitcoin influencers for some time has been like, this is a solution to irresponsible central bank policy, government fiscal policy and you know, things like that.

And a debt based monetary system, a general fiat, what, what have you. And so what are the implications then of this system that’s aiming to, you know, yoke the dollar to that and use it to perpetuate the dollar? I think people should seriously be asking themselves because we’re, you know, right now you have like bitcoin only companies taking lots of money from tether and being like we’re going to use the dollar to make bitcoin stronger and stuff. But you can’t also, you can’t do that and then also be like, you know, fiat bad, central bank bad, and then just essentially team up with that same system.

I mean it just seems kind of weird, doesn’t it? Well, on the case of Saudi Arabia dumping the petrodollar, you could argue that Mohammed bin Salman for some time has been moving away from the dollar. Well before that official announcement basically when he came to power he was trying to move Saudi Arabia to a post oil economy. He launched his Vision 2030 plan and made overtures there that he was going to try and move Saudi Arabia away from oil and sort of make it a leader in the fourth industrial revolution including INF Fintech. And we’ve also seen like other big actors in you know, Middle Eastern oil specifically like in, you know, the United Arab Emirates for for example, do kind of essentially the same thing.

So I think, you know, it’s something that sort of, you know, has been planned for some time. And what’s interesting is that mbs, as soon as he came to power and during the Trump administration was very close to Trump’s son in law Jared Kushner, who was also, we know from emails that have since come out promoting the idea of a, of like stable coins, like an official US dollar stable coin. He, that he actually, I think it was like a Sam Altman blog post that he shared with Steve Mnuchin of the Treasury Department talking about, you know, the USD coin, which you know, this is before Circle launched usdc but interesting.

So it’s very possible that these discussions were being had like some time ago that it’s not, not as recent as, you know, it may appear to be based on, you know, headlines that have been, that have been coming out recently. Yeah, I all I really want to add to that is that it’s important to keep in mind that like when the petrodollar system has been, you know, the standard for keeping the dollar, the global, you know, or reserve currency, the US has gone to war and like killed millions of people to defend that. One of the likely motivations, obviously there’s more than one, but one, one of the key ones in invading Iraq, I would argue, was the fact that Saddam Hussein, not long before the invasion had started selling oil in euros instead of dollars and made a lot more money showing by example to other OPEC members that they could make more money selling in different currencies than the dollar.

And then of course you have the case of Libya in 2011 where Gaddafi was trying to move to a gold backed currency called the dinar and was selling that to African countries, a lot of which either use dollars or they use, you know, the, you know, French financial stuff. And that’s why you had the US and France essentially lead that regime change operation with devastating consequences for Libya, which used to be the safest country in Africa, then became the most dangerous and has been cited as an example of or a reason for why, you know, immigration got so out of control in Europe that point.

So the dollar, you know, there are cases where, you know, the US government, or rather US empire is willing to go to extreme lengths to defend the dollar. So the idea that they would just sit idly by and just like let dollarization happen without having some sort of plan in the works, especially knowing that they couldn’t keep this going indefinitely and that the world was going to move at some point to a post oil economy. You know, I think it’s important to keep in mind that these people have been very serious and played very dirty and created insane instability just to keep the dollar, the global reserve currency, because it gives a lot of advantages just to the US And I fully feel that they intend to keep those advantages even if it means a different system.

I understand exactly what you’re saying. And it is true for the average Argentina that in some cases like this can be a lifeline, like I get that. But it’s important to look at the big picture here. And the big picture is that countries like Argentina and also Lebanon and several countries throughout the world world have been targeted by economic warfare for a very long time. Argentina is a very good example. You could argue it began in the 70s and the 80s and with the economic policy, I mean when Argentina was a military dictatorship, some of the financial policies they adopted were completely insane.

You had an, a neoliberal in power during the 90s who was very bad for Argentina in my opinion, Carlos Minham. And then you had their economic collapse in 2001, which again you could argue was a direct consequence of a lot of those policies, both of the dictators leadership and of Minim’s presidency. And then you have the, you know, the IMF come in and all these other entities and what they try and do after the 2001 economic collapse is have Argentina engage in things like debt for land swaps, debt for resources swaps. And this has been going on not just in Argentina but lot, lots of, you know, most of Latin America arguably for a very long time.

And it’s a resource grab. Yeah. And you know, some of what we allude to in this piece and what we hope to allude to in an upcoming, upcoming reports and you know, a book is that a lot of the, you know, people that you know, I’ve written about and that Mark, that Mark’s written about and that we’ve written about together are the engineers of that expressly. And by blowing out Latin American debt in the 80s and 90s, it was a way to basically yoke Latin America to the United States and or more broadly a lot of the transnational economic interests that you know, are based in the United States, like Wall street banks for example, they engineered a lot of this.

And so the situation in Argentina now didn’t just come out of nowhere. And obviously Argentina’s central bank, sorry, blank central bank has a lot of the blame but that also didn’t happen in a vacuum. People presidents appointed the heads of the central bank that made those policies. And even someone like Malay who’s railed against the central bank of Argentina, you know, put former central bank, former central bank president in a top post in his cabinet. So you know, these are choices that have been made by politicians. As someone who’s been and like reported from the ground on Argentina.

In Argentina, in Argentinian politics it, the corruption there, they just like don’t even. There’s politicians in Argentina that don’t even try to hide how corrupt they are. It’s just flagrant in some instances this instances in a way like I’ve never experienced anywhere else in the entire world. So I honestly think that Argentina, yes, those people have may need stable coins because of the current economic situation. But I think that was in. It was engineered to be that way. They were engineered into that, that position and then. And who benefits from that? The same people that I would argue created the solution and created the problem? Well, it’s important to understand that there was a explicit effort to limit the discussion about Epstein to make it just about the sex crime, so you don’t look at anything else.

Right. And he specifically was managing money for the Bronfmans during the insider trading. That was what actually why he came back? Well, it was suspected because Bear Stearns had the Bronfmans as a tax client. And Epstein left Bear Stearns because of, of allegedly because he was going to be. He, the SEC was investigating an insider trading scandal involving the Bronfman’s owned company, Seagrams. And they, the SEC was tipped off that Epstein had information about that and they went to question him at Bear Stearns and then he was let go. And there’s a lot of, you know, he gave different reasons as to why he was let go and so did the bank.

But there’s, you know, a significant body of reporting supporting that it was related to that insider trading scandal which also involved people from Drexel Burnham Lambert and the junk bonds. And you see a lot of Drexel people swimming around Epstein afterwards, like Leon Black, for example, who led their mergers and acquisition acquisitions department and were involved in, you know, all sorts of financial criminality. And in that same period of time, you know, he’s visiting the White House regularly and he’s going on official like Microsoft business trips with Microsoft’s chief technology officer. And then later in 2001 tells him, you know, the, the UK’s Evening Standard, that he made all of his money because of ties to Donald Trump, Leslie Wexner and Bill Gates.

And, and people act like Bill Gates and Epstein didn’t meet until 2011 when he was no longer affiliated with Microsoft. You know, I mean, there’s been a huge cover up of all of these other connections of Epstein there. And you know, I feel like my whole purpose as it relates to Epstein research is to make people aware of that because, you know, now I would argue that the reason Epstein went to prison and all of that stuff happened is because there was a major factional issue within this group and there was a, there were particular interests that wanted Epstein out and they wanted to, you know, to, to demonize him and make him look very bad, but they didn’t want to enough to come out that it would implicate stuff they were also involved in or had previously been involved in in the past.

Now, are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy’s been talked about for years. You’re.
[tr:tra].

See more of RichieFromBoston on their Public Channel and the MPN RichieFromBoston channel.