➡ The speaker apologizes for a mix-up with their YouTube channel and expresses gratitude for the overwhelming response to their new biology clinic. They mention an upcoming event at Polyface in June and encourage early sign-ups due to limited space. The speaker also discusses a study from Duke University that tracked a virus infecting human intestinal cells, questioning the methods used to identify the virus.
➡ The text discusses the questionable validity of certain scientific research methods, particularly those related to virus detection in cell cultures. It criticizes the lack of proper controls and the potential for misinterpretation of results. The text also mentions a study suggesting that small amounts of hydrogen sulfide, a gas produced by the human body, could help protect against neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s. Lastly, it explores the idea of kidneys as self-cleaning filters and the potential role of vortex mechanisms in this process.
➡ The text discusses various topics, including the speaker’s skepticism about the existence of vitamins as they are traditionally understood, suggesting that they might be markers for energetic functions rather than actual chemicals. The speaker also talks about the benefits of raw goat’s milk for babies and adults, and the importance of consuming it in its natural, unpasteurized form. Lastly, the speaker touches on the topic of the dorsal vagal complex and its role in the body’s response to trauma, suggesting that it might be responsible for the body’s shutdown response to traumatic experiences.
➡ The nervous system has two parts: the sympathetic, which prepares us for danger, and the parasympathetic, which helps us relax. Some believe that traumatic experiences can cause the parasympathetic system to shut down, leading to disease. However, it’s possible to reset this system through various methods, such as homeopathic remedies or certain activities. The text also discusses the potential harmful effects of electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) on our bodies, the possibility of reviving thyroid function after treatment, and doubts about the reality of cloning in animals.
➡ The speaker discusses three main topics: plant reproduction, staph infections, and the SARS-CoV2 genome. They explain that some plants can reproduce from leaf cuttings. They question the common belief that staph bacteria cause skin infections, suggesting instead that the body might be trying to eliminate toxins through the skin. Lastly, they describe the process of identifying the SARS-CoV2 genome, expressing skepticism about its validity due to the large number of possible combinations of RNA sequences.

Okay, welcome everybody and Happy New Year. And I apologize for the YouTube confusion. I guess we didn’t know that we weren’t going to be able to stream on the alternative channel. So we’re back to the usual channel and probably not everybody got that notice and so it may be difficult to find out where we are and unfortunately that was not what we expected. So sorry that that happened and I hope you’re able to find find the live stream as soon as you can. So with that said, I want to just wish everybody a happy New Year and hope you had a great holiday and that things are getting started off in a good way in the new year.

And I particularly want to mention that we had a incredible response to our new biology clinic signup last this past December. I think we had something like 176 new members, which is more than double what any previous month’s new membership. And that’s an extremely gratifying response. We’re just so I and the whole team is so appreciative of everybody’s support and you know, it may take a little bit for us to sort this out and get you with the right wellness specialist and the right enrichment services, but we will work on it and we will straighten it out and we hope that everybody gets their needs met and I’d love to hear from anybody about how it’s going to.

And again, thank you everybody for joining us and participating in our clinic. You know, without you, we’d be just talking to ourselves on the zoom calls. So that’s the first and most important thing. Second important thing is the signups for the new biology experience at Polyface this coming June where I will be there and hopefully a lot of the new biology team will be there. And it’s meant to be a 2, 3 day experience with lots of fun and music and probably some dancing and some talks and some workshops and some learning and some good food.

And probably as important as anything is actually getting to meet some like minded people. So we’re starting to form a whole new community of people who you can feel comfortable talking to, feel comfortable meeting. And hopefully after that experience you take those new friends back to wherever you live and make new friends. And so we’re hoping everybody joins us. We’re a little bit wondering or worried that there will tickets will sell out because there is a, I think a fairly hard cap based on the poly face requirements, just the amount of availability they have and the space that they have.

So you might want to sign up as soon as possible if you’re Thinking of going and I look forward to seeing everybody at Polyface next June. And I don’t know that I have any other announcements. Let me just check. Yeah, the new biology experience and everybody who’s been supporting and being customers on our Dr. Tom Cowan website and Dr. Cowan’s Garden. Again, thank you. We had a good year and thanks to you and hopefully everything will continue with more and more of the wonderful products that we’re able to source in the coming year. So with that the agenda today was I had some stuff, some studies that people sent me that I thought I would start with to just to reintroduce ourselves to some subject and maybe make a few comments.

And so there’ll be two and then I’ll get to the some pretty interesting amazing questions that people sent in in response to the question what are you thinking about for the new year? So let me share and I think I’m going to share the sound with this first one and see if I can find the video. And here’s the video. Hopefully you can see it. And this was an interesting one. It was done in the so called wire lab at Duke University. So you know, as people know I went to Duke, so that means it must be true.

And this was a published study that I don’t know was the first time where they actually were able to find a virus and track it as it infected the surface of human intestinal cells. So this was a landmark study in the real time. Documentation, let’s say of a virus infecting human intestinal cells. So let’s take a. Sam. Okay, so there you saw it. Now some of you the of a more skeptical bent might actually wonder how did they know that that purple squiggly line was actually a virus? So I decided that even though of course if it was from Duke, it must be true, I was going to go look at that study and go and find it and see how they knew it was a virus.

So let me take a look at that. This one we don’t need to share the sound, but we’re going to share this, share the screen. And here’s the study. And as usual it comes in this wonky format which it actually this study itself had a lot of pictures but the pictures don’t come out in the way that I do it. But anyways you can find the study if you want. It was from a journal called Natural Methods, I guess 2022, November 10th. There’s the pages capturing the start point of the virus cell interaction with high speed three dimensional single virus Tracking.

So they’re claiming that this purple squiggly line was a virus that they watched infect and attack the cells. So they say in the abstract the early stages of virus cell interaction have evaded observation due to the rapid diffusion of virions in the extracellular space and the large three dimensional cellular structures involved. Here we present an active feedback single particle tracking method with simultaneous volumetric imaging of live cell environment to address this knowledge gap, to present unprecedented detail to the extracellular phase of the infectious cycle. So then you go to the, and it goes on obviously and all of the this stuff is basically explaining how they get these images.

So I’m not going to go through that because frankly I didn’t read it all but it was all about this 3D smart image and the 3D faster imaging system collects sequential volumes etc etc and they get all these pictures and the first thing I noticed was there was no method section in the body of the paper, which is weird. So they go right from the introduction to the results and then they talk about how they essentially it’s the same getting into how they got these images and they, how they labeled the virus and we the different kinds of viruses that they did and the microscope and the pixel dwell time of the raster scan, whatever that means preventing the blur motion or the motion blur and all this stuff which is mostly about how they got the images.

So then they tell you that these were the surfaces and, and again those of you of a more skeptical note will say yeah but how did they know that was a virus? Where did they, where did they prove that that was a virus? So again it goes on and it’s pages and pages and then discussion internalized viral tracking. And then finally in the sort of after part of the paper we get to the methods and again it was all about this 3D smart thing in the instrument and how they got the optics and the overview of the faster thing and excitation optics, imaging, variable focus detection, all this is basically optics shared emission pathway.

And you say I just want to know where they got the virus from. So then they track imaging integration, trim data, acquisition flow work, automated acquisition, trim data. What you know, let’s plasmid construction, production of this. And finally almost at the end we finally get to viral vectors. That means the viruses were produced by the Duke Viral Vector Core facility described previously. So briefly they took these HEK293 T cells grown in 10 centimeter plates were transfected with this calcium phosphate based protocol and they grew the viruses in the Cell culture. And then they took some of the materials of the cell culture and quantified how much of this there was.

Then the viral solution was stored in aliquots at minus 80 degrees. And then they give you the details of the cell culture grown in these immortalized HeLa cells at the Duke Cell culture facility and et cetera, and you know, supplemented the same old thing grown using the restricted media, supplemented with fetal bovine serum using penicillin and streptomycin and maintained at 37 degrees. And then you got something that they say was the growth of the virus and then they stained it and then they took, they dumped that in and did all the optics and got the pictures.

So as I keep saying, and hopefully everybody has heard this, so they’re sick of it by now. Virology is all about the so called viral culture, otherwise known as the cell culture. If the cell culture is bogus, then they’re not dealing with a virus, they’re dealing with a broken down cell culture. And I think all of you know that the cell culture, starting with the 1954 paper from Enders and many, many times in the medical literature has been shown that you get the same results. Whether you put a sample of anybody in a cell culture or whether there’s no sample at all, you still get the cytopathic effect, proving without a shadow of a doubt that there is no virus.

The virus is never the independent variable in a cell culture. They never do proper controls. We have proven over and over again that there is no possibility of showing the existence of a virus with the way they do cell cultures. So essentially, once again, all they were doing was dumping the cellular debris, breakdown products, staining, whatever stains, dumping that in somebody’s intestinal cells culture, taking these fancy images and claiming that somehow shows viruses entering the cell or the intestines without ever once showing that they actually were working with the virus. So as they say, it’s the same old story everywhere you go.

You get scammed and libeled and you hear words you never heard in the Bible because it doesn’t say anything about this kind of nonsense there. So that’s the story with that. So unfortunately, we have to put Duke, which I already knew, in the same boat with everybody else as doing pseudo scientific fraudulent research. Okay, now I just wanted to point out, you know, I, I often criticize different research projects and different papers, but every once in a while, and this was actually sent to, in a group I was with this morning of a paper that actually described something that I thought was very interesting.

And actually is a doable thing that people could do, particularly if you’re worried about neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s. And so this was a paper that I will show you in a minute that described a very simple technique that they claim has been shown with this careful research to prevent the development of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s. So again, I’m going to show you a little graphic from the study first. You don’t need the sound here. So here’s basically a summary of the study. I’ll make it a little bigger. New study indicates sniffing your own farts increases brain power.

There you go. Let’s then take a quick summary of this story. So here is the summary of the story. Instead of stoop stopping to smell the flowers, scientists suggest stopping to smell your farts. While the thought may be enough to make your stomach turn, scientists at Johns Hopkins Medicine say the gas behind the foul rotten egg smelling stench known as hydrogen sulfide can help protect aging brains from Alzheimer’s disease. While the smelly gas is highly toxic in large quantity quantities, sorry, smaller doses may provide some serious health benefits. Johns Hopkins researchers noted in a study published in an issue of of the Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences Science.

So this is the most prestigious scientific journal probably in the United States. And the quote is our new data firmly link aging, neurodegeneration and cell signaling using hydrogen sulfide and other gaseous molecules within the cell, said the study’s lead scientists, Dr. Bindu Paul. The human body naturally creates small amounts of hydrogen sulfide which help regulate functions throughout the body. The gases can facilitate cellular messaging within the brain. So there you go, research you can use published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. That is why we need the government funded National Academy of Science to publish important works of scientific discourse like this one.

All right, yuch. It’s a good thing we have government funding for science. Okay, let’s get to some questions. Unfortunately my printer is broken so I don’t have all the whole question that people wrote, but I have like little summaries of it and hopefully that’s fairly cons, it’s fairly consistent with what people were trying to, to get at. So the first question, and there’s some really good ones here, Are kidneys really filters? If so, how do they clean themselves? And does this have anything to do with vortexing? So as everybody knows, I’m certainly one who’s up for questioning.

The basic things of what we learn, the basic truths of what we learn, and, and of course, we all learned in medical school and science class and third grade. The kilt. The kidneys filter the blood and then they give you these diagrams, these cartoons, because obviously we all know you can’t have scientific articles without cartoons or animations. You can have animations, cartoons, like the virus entering the cell. I didn’t see the farting study. I don’t know if it had any cartoons in it, but I suspect it did because they probably wouldn’t publish it without cartoons. You see the cartoon drawing of the glomeruli and the.

I’m getting out of my league here. The filtration mechanism in the microscopic glomeruli in the kidneys. But nobody ever asks, like, how does it actually do this? They talk about osmotic balances and concentration gradients and all that. And it’s an interesting question because if it’s a filter, how does the filter clean itself? And could this have anything to do with a vortex mechanism? So as far as I know, nobody has demonstrated that the fluid that comes out as urine is somehow being vortexed in the kidney. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen because nobody’s ever looked, as far as I know, or said anything about it.

So it’s possible it does. And then that the best I can answer for this question is it reminds me of something that I’ve talked about a lot in regard to the Analemma water WAND and the meawater.com vortexing magnetic device. And again, I can’t remember the guy’s name who’s the owner or director or science guy of the meawater.com website. But he, in a, in a lecture to a group that I’m with, made the very provocative statement of not to use water filters that just the process of magnet putting water through an electromagnetic vortex and what he calls charging the water, which he says you can actually measure and document, is enough to convert whatever harmful chemical is in the water into a harmless byproducts which don’t need to be filtered out.

And again, that is a very, I would say provocative and controversial and I would say probably not proven statement, but he does have some interesting evidence. And I’m going to get out of my league here with the chemical terms. But if you take something that is supposedly toxic, like chloramines in water and you put it through this magnetic vortex, or I would think if you stir it with Analemma wand, you convert this chloramine into relatively, if not completely harmless chemical byproducts of chloramine. And so Then it’s not like they outgas and go somewhere else. The breakdown products of these chemicals are still in the water, but they’re no longer in the form that is toxic, poisonous to living beings.

Now I certainly would wonder whether this has been proven and whether it’s been documented. And then you could even ask the question, how would the water know that chloramine is bad and that it should needs to be broken down into whatever that’s broken down to chlorine and some other salt that’s not harmful. And it could be that there’s some mechanism of life which is life being the creative process of the vortex and the electromagnetism, that’s that the water is put through. And that may be what guides this process from poisonous into harmless. Which of course still begs the question of how does it know which is which? But maybe that’s built into the chemistry.

And so that would be the self cleaning process of the water in a vortex electromagnetic stirring device. And it would presumably be the same cleansing process as you would find in a kidney. So if there is a electromagnetic impulse because of the body of the kidney, which is something that I would actually think is at least possible and maybe likely because the kidney is one of the sort of chakra centers, is a, you know, all the organs create their own electromagnetic field. And so you get, you have the electromagnetic field and. And then if there’s actually a vortex created in the kidney, you might be able to have a self cleansing mechanism.

Sorry. I always wonder whether they’re telling me the sound isn’t good, but I think it is. And that might be the self cleansing mechanism of the kidneys. So it’s a very intriguing question and unfortunately I don’t know those answers, but I would love to know whether anybody has any information on is there a vortex created in the kidney and is it possible to document a difference in things coming into the kidney in the blood versus coming out of the kidney in the urine, that they’re somehow rendered less toxic because of going through this electromagnetic field and vortex.

That would be the self cleansing mechanism. That would be something that is very much part of a life process. So it seems to be quite possible. Okay, next question is, I don’t think this was the exact question, but my interpretation. Is the government always wrong is the question or is everything that the scientists tell us, is it wrong? And you know, I used to say this with, I think the guy’s name was Anderson Cooper, used to make the claim that everything he said was basically a lie. And then one day I was listening, which I don’t usually do, but he said Today is Wednesday, January 7, whatever year it was.

And I looked in the calendar and sure enough that was the correct date. And so I had to take that back, that I was exaggerating. So not everything was a lie because that was clearly not a lie. He got the date right and maybe everything else was. So yeah, is everything a lie? I think one should certainly assume that or it’s certainly a manipulated story that has some other deeper meaning, deeper significance behind it. You know the story they tell us about why they did this action in Venezuela, we all know that’s not the right story.

All the war stories, we know that’s not the right story. The government is in the business of tyranny and protecting itself and increasing its own power. And as far as I can see, they’ll do whatever it takes in order to further that. And everything we do should be towards a voluntarist government free society because that’s the only way we can reclaim our real birthright as sovereign free men and women. That’s my opinion about that. Next question. Do is raw goat’s milk safe for a five month old otherwise breastfed baby as a kind of transition? And the answer to that is yes, it is safe.

I have counseled people to do exactly that with seemingly no issues. I am a avid consumer of goat milk, kefir. I, I’m a big fan of, of raw milk but I, I have come to I think believe it’s the right word that most adults do better souring the milk in some ways culturing fermenting rather than just drinking plain milk. Children, and particularly young children and babies seem to do fine with plain milk and they don’t need it cultured into kefir, yogurt, kumas or something like that. And I originally got this when I lived in Swaziland when I noticed that the no Swazi would drink fresh milk.

They would drink milk and there’s many milk drinking African tribes and they would always do the same thing. They’d get the milk and they did the same thing with the blood I think and they would put it on the shelf and put us some sort of starter thing in it and, and they let it sit for a day or so and then they would drink it and they said fresh milk isn’t good for you. But they did give it to the young children so you can give it to young children. I think you might want to look in the nourishing traditions baby formula because I think there’s Some other things, you might want to add a little bit of cod liver oil and some other things to the milk if you’re, especially if you’re going to use that as the only food, which is what I would not recommend.

If 6 months they can start eating food and they, I would certainly continue with breastfeeding but it is safe to use fresh goat’s milk. And if it’s, it’s just a supplemental food, you probably don’t even need to add some the other things in the nourishing traditions baby formula. But so let me be clear, there is a nourishing traditions baby formula made from raw milk either probably mostly cows, but it works with goats. I particularly like goat’s milk and make a lot of. I make raw milk kefir. If I can get fresh raw goat’s milk, I do it with that.

If I can’t, I get know grass fed cow’s milk. I make it into kefir. I fermented for 24 hours and then I make that into smoothies and I put some of our homegrown berries like aronia berries and currants and yasta berries, raspberries, blueberries, maybe some other ones that I’m forgetting. Honeyberries, elderberries. I put a little bit of raw honey in there, I put a few drops of cardamom extract and I put a little bit, about a quarter of a teaspoon of turpentine in that, blend it up into a smoothie and basically drink that every day. So I have no, in fact not only do I have no problem with drinking raw milk, including for a five month old baby, I would not drink pasteurized milk for any reason.

I basically don’t eat pasteurized milk products except some occasional pasteurized cheese and sometimes pasteurized cow’s milk yogurt just for some diversion. But most of the fermented stuff is raw milk kefir. You can buy kefir granules. And the reason I do kefir is because you don’t need to pasteurize the milk before you make the kefir. Okay, next one. Do vitamins exist? And I’ve certainly talked about this a lot and I don’t want to pull up the studies, but the most important part of this question is answering for me anyways. How do I know? How do I answer that question for myself? So how do I know if there’s vitamin A or a B vitamin in a living being like a person, like one of us? And how do I know that there is vitamin A in animal fat? Because that’s what they say.

Vitamin A is fat soluble vitamin found in the fat of animals. Whereas beta carotene is found in the plants and the animals converted in break apart the bonds allegedly and make the beta carotene into vitamin A. So how do I know those things exist? So I went to the original papers and said okay, how did they prove that, how did they isolate, purify, prove that vitamin A exists in our blood or in the fat of an animal or in our belly fat or some of the, some other places. And what I saw was they take a sample like animal fat or cod liver oil or some, some source of fat and they start adding chemicals to it and then they start washing it with different fat soluble stuff like acetone.

And at the end of that they get a relatively pure chemical and then they analyze it in a. However they analyze chemicals, electrophoresis or something and they come out with a pure chemical formula of this vitamin. So of course I have asked a number of analytical chemists over the years, how do you know that adding this base and this acid and washing it with acetone six times didn’t make something appear or precipitate something or make some chemical formulation that wasn’t actually there in the original sample? And every time I get the same answer, which is I have no idea.

And so I think all you can say at this point is we actually have no idea whether these purified chemicals exist at all in living beings. My suspicion is they don’t, that there’s some sort of, you know, they’re a sort of marker for a energetic function. And I’m not saying you don’t need to eat fat from animals. I’m not saying that eating cod liver oil or lard or butter is good or bad. I happen to think they’re all good for you. But it’s not because of the vitamin A or vitamin K or any other so called chemical in there.

It’s just for a lot of reasons, energetically. And from the story of the cow and the story of the cod and the way they’re processed, hopefully, and the way they’re raised and hopefully lovingly cared for, etc. You end up with a food which is highly nourishing to people and you don’t need to go down this tactic, this track of what does it contain in it. In fact, this is my sort of end of last year’s commitment is basically to as little as possible for my own self. Say the reason I’m eating something or doing something is because of some chemical that’s found in it.

So I don’t eat oysters because they have zinc. I either eat oysters or don’t. And it turns out I like to eat oysters because I think they’re a good food. I appreciate how they’re grown. I think historically they’ve been a very valuable food. And maybe mostly I like the taste and I like how I feel and I like the digestive processes that happen after I eat oysters. And I do not need to go down that reductionist, materialistic, hypothetical route of what chemicals it has in it. Because I agree with Carey Mullis when he says chemicals are hypothetical.

These bonds and these structures that we’re told make up living things, these are constructions of the mind. They are hypothetical stuff which we somehow have come to believe make up living beings. And I think living beings are made of. Of energy and earth, water, air and fire and not these hypothetical chemicals. Next question. This is about the dorsal vagal complex. And is it true that when you have a traumatic experience, particularly like medical interventions or some emotionally traumatic experience or something that’s, you know, that’s a trauma that you shut down? And the reason for this shutting down is because of a deactivation of the dorsal vagal complex.

So the vagus nerve is, we’re told, is the nerve that controls or maybe activates or is associated with or et cetera, connected with the parasympathetic nervous system. So we’re told we have two nervous systems, the autonomic nervous system and central nervous system. And the autonomic nervous system is divided into two branches, the sympathetic and the parasympathetic. And the sympathetic is all about fight or flight. And a bear is chasing you, so you run, and so your pupils get dilated, and you shunt blood to your muscles so you can run faster and your heart rate increases. And the parasympathetic is the opposite.

It’s rest and digest. Life is good. You’re well fed. You have warmth and shelter and emotional support and love and all the rest of it. And so you can relax into life and feel the joy and the happiness of just being alive. And when you’re confronted with a particularly emotionally or even physically traumatic experience, there’s been some books written about this, like waking the tiger. Animals after an experience like that, they tend to shake. And they’ve said the reason for that is it basically resets the parasympathetic nervous system so they go into a. What this person is talking about, a parasympathetic shutdown.

And then the reactivation of it is this shaking response and that clears the parasympathetic nervous system and then they can go on their way. And you can certainly see that sequence of events with animals in the wild, and I’ve seen it with, with cats when they get scared and then they do some sort of shaking tremor kind of activity and they stretch and then they go on about their way as if nothing happens. The point I think of this is there’s a lot of people, including a lot of us at the new biology clinic, who think a lot of disease happens because you get stuck in this parasympathetic shutdown reaction.

In other words, you get a trauma and it essentially paralyzes your parasympathetic nervous system, otherwise known as your vagal complex. And then you can live the rest of your life with a partly partially shut down vagal parasympathetic response. Now, all I can say is I’m not sure that I know or that anybody knows that the harmful effects of a traumatic experience, which I do think is something we can observe with people and you can sometimes observe when they, they come out of it. And we actually, in our clinic, Maureen is helping us understand there actually are homeopathic remedies, aconite and ledum and a bunch of others that actually reset this shock response and help people come out of it.

And they actually sometimes relive or at least partially relive this traumatic experience. I think this is certainly part of the philosophy of German new medicine, but I don’t think we’re victims of these traumatic experience. I think it has to do with how we process it and what we make of it and what we tell ourselves. And that determines whether the, the so called trauma will become something that’s disease forming for us or something that we can actually shake off like an animal and then go on about our way. And some things are probably way more difficult to shake off.

And we may need some help either with activation of the parasympathetic nervous system, maybe through working with the vagus nerve or some homeopathic remedy or some anthropos, some, sorry, some energy type of work that actually re stimulates the parasympathetic nervous system. I’ve talked about this before and again, I don’t know if it’s a parasympathetic nervous system activation. I tend not to think like that. I think about just what is it that I can experience and what’s the effect on me. Then people are often or continually trying to make up a story about the mechanism of how it works.

And I think we should be very careful about these mechanisms and just stick with the experience. But one thing that I’ve done, which I’ve heard people say is a activation of the parasympathetic nervous system, which I’ve probably done for five years or so, pretty much every single morning is one of the first things I do. After I warm up the cat’s food and I restart the water kefir, which is something that I drink. Then I splash ice cold water on my face five times. And there’s something about that that has a activation, activating, awakening experience. I can’t say that I like it, but I do it every day.

And maybe that’s why it helps reset my vagal tone. Next question. How do EMFs make us sick and how do they mimic viruses? So it’s, I think, actually fairly simple. Interesting. There was a conversation I was part of this week whether EMFs, as some people suggest, work on voltage gated calcium channels. And I think, as everybody knows, I don’t think there are pumps or channels or gates or any of those purported structures in our cell membranes. Hillman was adamant that that was a unproven, basically nonsense, that when you take even an electron microscope image of a cell membrane, you never see any pumps, you never see anything sticking out.

All they can say is calcium has an effect. And then they make up a story the mechanism of how it works with this alleged gate. And all I can say is I know a gate when I see one. And my goats come in and out of the gate all the time. And that’s what I mean by gate. And there ain’t no gate of calcium in our cell membranes. That’s not to say that calcium doesn’t have an effect, but I think the effect of changing the electromagnetic frequency is it gives different and probably erroneous information to the water.

So the water structures itself in an abnormal way. And we already know that the sodium potassium distribution is a function of the water structure inside the tissue. And my guess is so is the calcium and so are all the other ions. They’re a result of the unique and particular structure of the water in A, that organ and B in U. And if you shoot a beam of electromagnetic frequencies into the person, at the person on the person, you will change the structure of water and that will change the charge of the person. Their battery becomes, quote, dead or run down and they don’t distribute the sodium, potassium or calcium or other ions.

People then make up pumps to account for this. There’s no pumps. It’s just a disordering of the structure of the water. And that then tells your body, we got a bad structure here. Let’s dissolve it and make mucus and have a whole bunch of cell debris and cellular breakdown products. And there’s probably some things which are interpreted as nucleic acids. And those become the alleged viruses, which are nothing more than just pieces of the tissues breaking down and all the different chemicals that are associated with that. And those are what people for the last hundred or so years have called viruses.

They’re no such thing. They all come from you. They’re just cellular tissue debris breakdown products. Can we restart the thyroid after radioactive iodine treatment? That probably depends on how much damage there is and how much thyroid function was lost. I certainly think it’s worth a try. I probably wouldn’t go cold turkey with getting off whatever thyroid you’re taking, but I would probably switch to a. The first step would be switch, if you’re on Synthroid or some chemical thyroid to one of the desiccated thyroids, and also add the glandular from either US or allergy research that has thyroid in it.

So you’re getting the benefit of essentially eating the whole gland. And then I would start to try to rehabilitate whatever is wrong, whatever symptoms you have, and probably use a lot of sea vegetables. You could even use our sea vegetable powder. Eat that every day. And see, the other important food would be eating bone broth every day, because the thyroid needs the bone broth in order to make its products. So bone broth and seaweed and a glandular thyroid. Switch to desiccated. Probably do some detoxification and see if you can rehabilitate your thyroid. Okay, next question, which is interesting.

Is cloning real? And this is something that I have not looked into very much. I know that Stefan Lenke did, and he at least claimed, particularly with, like, Dolly the sheep and all these other cloning experiments, that basically what they were doing was highly inbreeding these different animals and claiming that they were using clones. And the difference is inbreeding is still, you know, sexual reproduction, whereas cloning is taking a piece. And so you’re essentially bypassing the sexual reproduction in the production of a new organism. So if you take a mammal, you just take a part of the mammal and allegedly grow the whole new mammal from that part without having to go through sexual reproduction.

And my strong suspicion is that doesn’t work and that they’re not actually doing cloning, that they’ve never been able to produce a. Certainly not a mammal or any other living animal through that method that you have to go through this sexual reproduction cycle in order to create a new living animal for sure. And probably a plant. Not that you can’t. I mean, some plant. Let me take that back. Some plants, you can take a piece of it and grow a new plant. So it seems to be. That’s a sort of a cloning. It’s not with DNA, but you can take a certain part of a plant like Briophyllum.

You can take the, the end, the rootlets that grow at the end of the leaves is called mother of thousands. You can take that and root lid and just put that in the soil and it’ll grow a new plant. And you can do that with a lot of plants. So with plants you can. So we’re talking about the sexual reproduction of animals. And as far as I know, although I could absolutely be wrong about this because I’ve never looked into it and I’ve never in particular read the method section of how they cloned the animal. And it would be interesting to see whether they actually tell the truth and have a complete method section where you could actually see what they did.

I doubt it. But if it, if they did, you would be able to see whether they really only took the DNA. Because we don’t actually have the g. The full genome of humans or any other animals. So I don’t see how that’s possible even on their own terms that the genome is the determining factor for the animal. That story is already not true. And since we don’t have the whole genome of any animal, I don’t see how they could say they can clone a whole animal from a whole genome which they don’t even have. That’s my guess.

I could be certainly shown that I’m wrong, but that’s what I think. Two more. What is a staph infection? So that’s already a loaded question. So there. What you mean is, what does it mean if you have staph growing, for instance, in a lesion on your skin? Because if you say what is a staph infection? Then you’re already making the assumption, which a lot of people do. And I understand saying, asking the question in this way, but you’re already assuming that the staff, which is a type of bacteria, is the causative organism in this disease process.

But that’s the question. Is this an infection or is there something else going on? And the only way to sort this out is to take a pure culture of staph, which is easy to come by and nothing else. So staph and saline or distilled water, spray it on people and see if they get a illness, see if it makes them sick, see if they get lesions on their skin. And as far as I know, that study has never been successfully done. Therefore, at this point, all you can say is the theory that staph or staph aureus or methyl methicillin resistant staph aureus, MRSA or any of these organisms is never been proven to be the causative agent.

So what could be happening? Certainly there are lesions. And because people then say so, you’re saying, I don’t have lesions on my skin. No, you absolutely have lesions on your skin. You can see them and you may even be really sick. And it’s possible people could even die, but it’s not because of an infection with this organism. That is something you would have to prove. As far as I know, it hasn’t been proven, so don’t say that. But there is some sort of toxic condition and the body is probably trying to eliminate these toxins through the skin because it’s in a sense overloaded and it’s building up in the blood and maybe in some of the other organs, which is why you’re really sick.

And so the body is trying to eliminate some of it through the skin. And the staph organisms, like those conditions, they may even be pleomorphically organized to sort of help break down the skin and digest some of the toxins that are coming out so that they’re there actually to support the process. If you kill the staff, you may get rid of the lesions, but the person is still sick and still is in a toxic condition, which is why the success rate of the therapy is not so good. And what you really need to do is understand how the body got poisoned.

Is it thoughts, emotions, glyphosate, bad food, bad water, arsenic? You know, could be a lot of things. What happened? Is it vaccines? That’s the usual one. Pharmaceutical products, that’s number two. Surgeries, that’s probably number three. Those are the thing that’s the reason why people get these in hospitals, because they’re given all these drugs and sometimes vaccines, done all this surgery with toxic anesthetic products, and then they start trying to eliminate it through the skin and they get lesions and the staff try to help you out and detoxify to process these poisons and they claim that those are the causative agent.

They get rid of the staph and often doesn’t work and the patient succumbs because of the problem hasn’t been addressed and in fact because they made the problem worse by giving you toxic antibiotics to treat a non existent infection. I’m not saying the staph isn’t there and I’m not saying you’re not sick and I’m not saying this could even be a bad situation. But to say that it’s an infection, you’d have to prove that. And as far as I know, it’s never been proven. And the final question, what is the SARS CoV2 genome composed of? That’s a very simple question.

The original genome was they took the sputum sample, the balf fluid from a person that they said had pneumonia, probably did have pneumonia. They said it was a new kind of pneumonia because they couldn’t find the usual organisms. They took their, their fluid and they chopped it up into little pieces and they got 56 million different pieces of the RNA which they said must be part from the genome of the virus, and they put those into the computer and they got 1.2 million different possible combinations for arranging those little pieces into a long string. That was with one program and with the other they got about 450,000 different possible combinations.

They arbitrarily chose the longest because it was around 90% similar to previous coronaviruses. And through that ridiculous pseudo scientific fraudulent process, that’s how they claimed they had the genome, they published the genome, and that is the SARS COV2 genome. Okay, thanks everybody for joining me. Sorry about the YouTube confusion. Check out the new biology experience. And again, thanks everybody for supporting the clinic and all our other ventures and happy New Year and see you next week.
[tr:tra].

See more of DrTomCowan on their Public Channel and the MPN DrTomCowan channel.