So these people in 2016 acknowledged that our election systems are susceptible to being hacked. And if we said the same thing in 2020 or even asked the question or expressed concern about it, they tried to jail and destroy you. Just before I came out, Tulsi Gabbard, who is the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, runs that office, released and declassified information about the Russiagate smears of Trump. And the documents show that the Obama gang and Comey’s FBI and CIA and the deep state intelligence agencies basically rushed through a process to create the fake news that the Russians wanted Trump to win.

And what Tulsi’s report or information shows is that what had happened was the initial report was the Russians didn’t and couldn’t interfere with our elections. They may have wanted to, but they wouldn’t have had much impact. Certainly they couldn’t access our systems in a way to change the elections. But that wasn’t what the Obama gang wanted. They wanted to smear Trump. And the documents show that they threw out, essentially, the document that was relatively straightforward because it didn’t help their seditious, treacherous agenda. And they concocted another one, which was Russia, Russia, Russia.

And we talked about this last week, where they wandered the Steele dossier through this subsequent analysis. The Steele dossier was the fake garbage created by the Clinton campaign paid for in partnership with the FBI to smear Trump and to use it to undermine his administration and try to get him thrown in jail. And so the details of this document are really incredible. So Tulsi posted a series of tweets that are very effective in describing what the issues are about. So let’s go through it one by one, because it’s worth the time, because the media is not going to tell you about this, but I will.

The creation of the Russia hoax, as I described, real intel assessment. Russia and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting cyber, tax, and infrastructure. As I noted, that was the initial conclusion. And that happened shortly before Trump won. This was around September of 2016. Trump wins. They have an Obama gang meeting with Obama in the White House on December 9th, and they literally meet the plan, the Russia hoax. So Obama ordered a new investigation or new summary of the fake information there on the right. IC begins outlining new assessment to claim election was hacked.

And the day before, and you know how we know something happened, the day before on December 8th, the IC pulled the product about how the Russians didn’t do anything at the request of the FBI. So they create this intelligence assessment that’s fake. They immediately start oniging it and essentially weaponize it in order to undermine and destroy the Trump administration. So this was the initial consensus. We are working with CIA on a presidential daily brief submission on the threat. The thrust of the analysis is that there is no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count.

Later on, September 9th, we agree with Russia probably, and this is the line they agree with that was going to be in the presidential daily brief, Russia probably is not and will not trying to influence the election by using cyber means to manipulate computer-enabled election infrastructure. And then clapper talking points. We assess, just before that infamous meeting with Obama, we assess that foreign adversaries did not use cyber attacks on election infrastructure to alter the US presidential election outcome this year. We have no evidence of cyber manipulation or election infrastructure intended to alter results.

So they go down, let’s go down in the next one. They pulled the brief. This is what it was to say before it was pulled. Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure. Okay, and there you have the, this is the smoking gun. Based on some new guidance, we are going to push back publication of the presidential daily brief. It will not run tomorrow and is not likely to run until next week. And the next day, as Tulsi highlights, Brennan, clapper, all the rest met at the secret meeting.

So look at the gang that’s there. The participants include Susan Rice. Biden was asleep, I guess he wasn’t there. John Kerry, Victoria Newland, Adam Shusman from Treasury, Loretta Lynch, Justice Department, Mary McCord, Justice Department, Jay Johnson, top DHS official, the chief of staff at the time, Dennis McDonough, Neil Eggerson, who was type one house counsel, top lawyer, Andrew McCabe for the FBI, the corrupt Andrew McCabe, the corrupt John Brennan for the CIA, et cetera, Ben Rhodes. The IC is prepared to produce an assessment per the president’s request. So Obama got the operation going to get Trump.

Let’s go down to the next tweet. And this was the fake news reports. Well, Russia has long conducted cyber spying on US agencies, companies, and organizations. This presidential campaign marks the first time Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere and if not actively influence the outcome of the election, completely opposite to what they said before. It was all made up. It all began leaking immediately after the meeting and contemporaneous with it. Let’s go to the next one. And of course, they used the Steele dossier. And someone said, why did we use the Steele dossier? That’s essentially what that email says.

The Steele dossier was a factor in the Obama intelligence assessment. So they used this fake dossier to try to destroy President Trump. I mean, this is important. And there’s enough here, given the various testimonies and the conspiracy that I think continues to this day, to warrant a fulsome criminal investigation. And I’m pleased the agencies are releasing this info, but this can’t be the end of it. We got to go to the punishment phase, the accountability phase for the warfare against Trump. And I found something very interesting in the documents that we uncovered here, or that were produced.

Of course, we had asked for records like this many, many times. So you can be sure our pressure helped get some of these records out. This is from a FBI analyst. Listen to this paragraph. See, it’s from the blacked out name intelligence analyst technology cyber intelligence unit, cyber intelligence section. So let’s look at number two there. We believe it is worth noting that in an extremely close race, it is certainly possible that a very targeted cyber attack aimed at manipulating votes could lead to a change in the legitimate results and affect the outcome of the election.

As an example, the votes in a swing county in a swing state could potentially be slightly altered, thus resulting in the electoral college votes of a particular state to go toward one particular individual, thus tipping the entire election in their favor. I.e. in the 2000 election, the results in Florida essentially were decided by one or two counties. Although this is unlikely, it certainly remains a possibility and one that can’t be discounted due to the high impact, even with the disjointed nature of U.S. electing technology. So here we have, just before the 2016 election, an FBI intelligence analyst sharing with other top officials in the United States government that yes, our election systems are subject to potential hacking by foreign actors in a way that can affect the outcome of the election.

And it seemingly is easy to do. You don’t need to do it nationally. All you need to do is go into a select county or select state and you can get it done. Now if you made that allegation, as you recall, around 2020, you were sued, you were disbarred, you were targeted for censorship, you were threatened with jail. In fact, you probably were, you could go to jail already if it weren’t for the election changing the leadership of the Justice Department. So these people in 2016 acknowledged that our election systems are susceptible to being hacked.

And if we said the same thing in 2020 or even asked the question or expressed concern about it, they tried to jail and destroy you. Yeah, so I’m ticked off about this Russia stuff, but we already knew that they had been doing this in large measure. This is more proof beyond a shadow of a doubt. I have no doubt. But this is really outrageous here. It shows you how dishonest our whole system is, isn’t it? I mean, not only the Justice Department was trying to jail you for thinking like this, even though that was standard analysis.

You had the big tech platforms censoring you. Heck, we still get throttled and censored over this garbage, raising questions about 2020. We still get censored online. Judicial Watch does. I’ve been censored repeatedly over the issue. So everyone involved in this should be criminally investigated. And I’ve observed before, Obama knew, Biden knew, Hillary knew, Clapper knew, Schiff knew. Comey knew, McCabe knew. And of course, Obama did it. And no, it’s not too late to impeach Obama. They impeached Trump, proceeded with impeachment proceedings against Trump after he was president. They should do the same for Obama in the least.

Like our video down below. [tr:trw].

See more of Judicial Watch on their Public Channel and the MPN Judicial Watch channel.