Possible mechanisms involved developing dysuria, that means painful urination and purulent discharge, that means pus symptoms 24 to 48 hours after sexual intercourse relieved with IM penicillin. So this is a question that suggests that the cause of painful urination and the pus discharge from the penis was a bacterial infection, which is what we’re told. And again, this goes to what I was talking about in the very beginning. What I want to try to communicate is not an alternative theory about what might have happened here, but let’s go through the thinking once again of how you would know whether this is caused by a bacterial infection.

And again, you can make a lot of assumptions and say, well, if you have a symptom and it’s cleared up with a antibiotic, that proves it’s a bacterial infection. And obviously that isn’t true because the bacteria could be part of the restoration process or the antibiotics could be doing something else, which we know they do. So that is not proof because it’s not exclusive evidence that the only possible mechanism could be the killing of bacteria. Now, just to say, I’m not questioning whether this person had painful urination or pus coming from their penis.

The question is why. And at the end of the day, and if somebody wants to say that I’m wrong about this, they’re gonna have to show me how and why, the only way to prove this would be to take an isolated bacteria. So in this case, could be syphilis bacteria, the spirochete, could be the gonococcus bacteria, could be chlamydia, but here it was probably either syphilis or gonococcus. So you take the isolated bacteria, which you can grow, and you can isolate, meaning separate from everything else, and then you have the person’s penis be exposed to just this bacteria, and then you show that it causes these symptoms in a whole bunch of people, and then you do it with a control.

So instead of putting the pure culture of the bacteria, you put something else inert that maybe looks and smells like it, and you dip your penis in that and see if you get the same symptoms. That study, as far as I know, has never been done with any kind of sexually transmitted bacterial infection. If you think I’m wrong, you have to send me the study or put it in the comments to this video, and as far as I know, it hasn’t been done with any bacterial so-called infection ever. Therefore, the mechanism, the way that we would prove this to be the case, has never been done.

So at best, this is a unproven hypothesis, and I would go so far as to say every time that study has been attempted, they get nothing. In other words, it doesn’t cause disease more than placebo, which means I would actually put it in the category of a disproven hypothesis until somebody can come up with a study that proves that this is how things work. [tr:trw].

See more of DrTomCowan on their Public Channel and the MPN DrTomCowan channel.