➡ The speaker believes that if Democrats were in office and Israel attacked Iran, Trump would claim such an event wouldn’t have happened under his leadership. The speaker admires Trump’s presidency and thinks he would have prevented wars. However, the speaker also questions this belief, suggesting the need to view the situation more broadly. The speaker values honesty and independence in expressing their views, regardless of political alignment.

Preem leader over in Iran. Now, I have to be honest with you guys. I have to be honest and we gonna get it both from the Democrats perspective. We gonna cover this extensively today. We gonna get it both from the Democrats perspective. Um and we’re gonna get it from the conservative perspective. Alright? Cuz I heard Bernie Sanders did a whole video on it and so I wanna I wanna evaluate that. Now, I haven’t seen the video yet. But based off of the title of that video, I’m afraid. I’m afraid that I might agree with Bernie Sanders on this issue.

That’s bothersome. That is bothersome. Support and resistance with no profile picture said. Know your platform is going to freeze. Nah, we’ll just switch over to something else and we’ll continue on to the show. But the Supreme Leader is saying that they will not surrender and the US is going to pay as a result of it. So, let’s get into it y’all. Make sure I hit a like for the algorithm. Subscribe to the channel when sending a notifications. Those who are familiar with the politics of the region, they know that the Americans involvement in this matter will 100% be at their loss.

The loss they receive will probably be much more than the damage Iran will bear. If America have a military presence, on the ground without a doubt, it will be an irreparable loss. They are threatening us and they are also clearly asking us to surrender with an unacceptable language. They asked the nation to surrender and they ask us to come and surrender, which surprises us. First of all, they should threaten someone who is scared of their threat. The nation of Iran has shown that they does not feel intimidated by the threat of those doing the threatening moments ago.

Iran Supreme Leader addressed his nation saying Iran will not surrender. He also directly responded to President Trump. Ayatollah Ali Khomeini made this threat. Let the Americans know that the Iranian nation is not one to surrender and any military invention on their part will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage. His remarks coming this day after President Trump called on Tehran to surrender unconditionally. CNN’s Nick Paton Walsh is in London. What more can you tell us about what the Iranian Supreme Leader is saying this morning to his nation, but clearly sending a message to the world and specifically the United States? His second public comment since this conflict, this phase of the conflict began on Friday.

And I should say, yes, while the rhetoric is fiery, it’s not the most combustible language we’ve heard coming out of Tehran. And indeed, irreparable damage, he says, that will be done. He doesn’t necessarily say it will be done to the United States bases, for example, in the region. He doesn’t, as far as we know at this point, appear to even mention President Trump by name. And also to the version we’re seeing is a statement that’s been read by a female anchor on state news broadcasting. So an interesting set of nuances here. But the words themselves are that the Americans know that the Iranian nation is not one to surrender and any military intervention on their part will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage.

Those who are wise and familiar with Iran, its people and its history will never speak to this nation in the land. It’s a language of threats. And this, of course, comes after Trump himself suggested that Khamenei was an easy target and suggested they would hold off killing him for now and demanded unconditional surrender. Now, I think many long term observers of Iran would say to you, it is highly unlikely at any stage you would hear the Ayatollah or anyone in his security circle accept the notion of unconditional surrender. And how, of course, will that even practically occur with Israeli jets in the sky? But this statement, I think, is it’s clearly putting Iran in a position where it’s not about to suddenly cut out to any specific American demand.

It is clearly not looking publicly here or beseeching America for some kind of diplomatic off-ramp. But you’ve got to bear in mind, too, Sarah, the position and condition Iran is currently in. A significant part of its military and, indeed, nuclear scientists haven’t been killed. That hierarchy gone disrupted. Even the replacement chief of staff of the military killed in just the last 24 hours. Or 48 hours. Khamenei himself clearly dealing with the most existential crisis, indeed, of his career with the Natanz and Richmond plant heavily damaged, according to UN inspectors speaking in the last 48 hours by these Israeli strikes.

And so they’re now looking, I think, at their military arsenal. What, indeed, do they have left? Some experts we’ve been speaking to have suggested they have between 1,000 to 2,000 missiles that could hit Israel. They’ve possibly burned through 500, maybe 700 of those so far. So really doubts as to how much they have left that could be used deterrent against Israel, period. And I think that will be dictating a lot of their choices going forward. They can’t publicly give in, but there’s not an awful lot, potentially, as far as we know, they can do to deter the U.S.

and Israel in the days and weeks ahead. Iran Supreme Leader ratcheting up its war of words with the U.S. this morning, the U.S. military now surging its troops in the region. And two sources of CNN says President Trump is increasingly warming to the idea of the U.S. using its military to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities. Iran, ramping up. Tough talk, as we mentioned just a short time ago. Iran Supreme Leader warned that if the U.S. gets involved in the conflict, it will cause irreparable damage. That comes after President Trump said the ayatollah would be an easy target and demanded Iran’s unconditional surrender.

Already, the U.S. is mobilizing forces, sending another aircraft carrier to the Middle East. And sources telling CNN the U.S. is deploying more than 30 aerial refueling tankers to the region as well. This is not based off of anything that anybody told me. This is just me looking at all of the news reports over time, asking a lot of questions on why we continue to be in alliance with Iran. Everybody keeps telling me, oh, no, it’s because, you know, the Holy Land. Thank you. Get the hell out of here, bro. You’re never never going to sell me on an idea that we’re supporting Iran.

I mean, supporting Israel or that we’re holding them down because it’s God’s people or something like that. I don’t believe it. I don’t believe it. I believe that the reason why. Why we support different people and different countries is because either it financially benefits us or it puts us in a position to use them as crash dummies so that we can then shut down whoever our real adversaries or who we really have issues with. That’s what I believe. I could sit here and talk about what the news talk about. I could sit here and say, yeah, you know, there are allies because of what’s going on against their neighbors and Iraq and all of that.

I could sit here and play that game. If I’m giving my personal opinion, I believe that the reason why we’re doing it is because we don’t like the fact that they are trying to develop nuclear weapons. We don’t like the fact that they’ve continued to support our adversaries and their allies. And more importantly, it’s an opportunity for us to be able to take them out and have a proxy war. And this is one of the reasons why we continue to support them with military equipment refueling all of this stuff. And so we may be benefiting financially as far as Israel may be sending money so that they can buy some of the stuff that they’re using in order to have this war.

But I believe that we are absolutely in a proxy war with Iran. I don’t care what’s preached in white churches. I’m telling you what I believe. I don’t care what’s preached in white churches. I don’t know. Have y’all been to white churches? Do y’all know what they’re saying inside of the pulpit? I believe this is our opportunity to once and for all put a stop to this and get them up out of the way. Now, I could be off. I could be off. And this is the reason why I have y’all inside of the chat to say some of the things that y’all say, because we do not move.

And they are. We are not an echo chamber. We say what we want. We say what we really mean. And we get it popping. Now, let’s look at this from the other side, right? Let’s look at it from the other lens because I don’t agree with everything that Trump does. And this is one of the main things that I have a disagreement. And I’m not saying that he’s wrong. I’m a wait and see and see how it plays out. Let’s say that Kamala Harris’s disaster was in office, right? Let’s say that we had Kamala Harris in office right now.

Let’s say that we had Kamala Harris in office right now. And I think that that would be an absolute the worst possibility. Let’s say that we had Kamala Harris in office. And we had this same situation. It’s a positive, strong possibility that you would see Israel strike Iran, right? What do you guys think that Trump would have said if we’d have had Democrats in office, Biden, Kamala Harris, whomever. If we’d had Democrats in office and Israel then struck Iran in the same way that they did right now, what do y’all think that Trump would say? What’s up to my girl Mika? I’ve seen what Senator Ted Cruz said to Tucker Carlson.

What do y’all think that Trump would have said? A proxy war is a war that we’re indirectly having or waging against whoever our enemy is. So, for example, if you’re using Israel or Israel is saying, man, I got beef with this person and you say, yeah, you know, I don’t necessarily got beef with him. But if you want to strike him, I’m not going to do nothing about it. And I know you’re my ally, so I’m going to hold you down. We don’t want to do it ourselves, so we’re going to leverage other countries to do it for us.

That’s what a proxy war is. Trump would say no wars on my watch. Oh, Jerry, if you hit the nail on the head, he would say we would never have been in that war had I been in office. Correct, brothers, keeper. He would say Iran would have never did this. They would have been crippled when I was in office. We had sanctions on them and they had no money. They had no power. And now look at where they are and so on and so forth. That is exactly what he would say. And I’m just being honest.

And I love Trump. I love Trump. I love what it is that he’s done in office so far. We had a Democrat in office and this had happened under their watch. Trump would say that we would never have had this happen had I been president of the United States of America. And we’re just going to be real. Y’all, can we keep it 100? Can we have an uncomfortable conversation right now? Can we have an uncomfortable conversation right now? Or do we have to be politically correct? And we all, most of us is conservative in here.

I’m not uncomfortable to have uncomfortable conversations because nobody owns me. Nobody has ever given me a paycheck, no news organization, no news agency, anybody that has ever offered me anything. No pack, no advertisement, no nothing. Anybody that has ever offered me anything, I’ve always turned them down because I believe in maintaining the integrity of my platform to be able to say what I really want to say. Nobody can say that I’m paid. Nobody can say that I’ve ever got a check. Nobody can say that anybody has ever hired me. I want to say what I want to say.

And so as a result of saying what I want to say, even though I 100% agree with the job that he has done thus far inside of being president since he’s been inaugurated back in January, what he would have said had a Democrat been in office is this would have never happened under my watch. And we would have all been in agreement and we would have been saying, yeah, I would have been in agreement based off of no new wars on his first term, I would have said that is 100% true. Man, I can’t stand these Democrats, they are warmongers and all of this stuff.

So now I have to look at this a little bit more holistically and say, well, does this really make sense? I would have 100% been on board. 100% been on board. That’s true because the track record says so. That’s true. And you know what, this never would have happened to Ukraine, this never would have happened. We would never be in this war. I can’t stand these Democrats. I would have 100% on board. 100% been on that train. Not even questioning it. I thought about this. I thought about this this morning as I was taking a shower.

I looked at the news and I said, yep, we’re going to continue to cover Iran and Israel and all of this stuff today, right? I knew it. And then I thought to myself, because I had looked at a video that was on TikTok from some crazy liberal and somebody that was gay. And he was like, if Kamala Harris would have been in office, we would have had these deportations. He was talking with a bunch of THs in his speech. And then I started to combine it, right? I said, well, if Kamala Harris would have been in office, what would we have said? Because I think that she would have been a disaster, 100%.

But what would we have said as Republicans that supported Trump? We would have said, well, if Trump was in office, we wouldn’t even have these wars anymore. How am I a loser? You know, you know, you know, the thing about liberals, you know, the thing about Democrats is I’ve always kept it 100. I’ve always been 100% honest with my thoughts and how I see things, right? 100%, which is one of the reasons why we have in this conversation right now. I’ve always been 100% real with my thoughts. And so even when it seems as though I’m aligning with their sentiment a little bit, right? They still can’t take they still can’t take it.

I can’t take it. I don’t like you, Anton. Okay. I know that charges some angry motherfuckers. I had a nickname. I had a nickname for a guy that I used to work with. And it was back when I was working in right before I started working at the steel mill and I was working at this. I was working at this auto supplier. And every time you would go in the lunch room, it didn’t matter if you agree with this one guy or you disagree with this one guy, his nickname for us. And he didn’t know what his nickname to us was was me motherfucker.

That’s the honest to God truth. And you know what? I’m about to start doing stand up because I don’t want y’all taking my content and taking my original content and then seeing it somewhere else. And somebody taking myself. It was a guy that I used to work with. And we used to it didn’t matter what happened. We didn’t know if he had a bad marriage. We didn’t know if his kids was gay. We didn’t know if he just didn’t like the job that he was doing. He had been there for a long time since the opening of that auto supplier.

And every time you go in the lunch room, he was angry. This is evil. And we used to call a mean motherfucker. That’s a mean motherfucker over there. And that’s how I look at Democrats. You can go over and kick it with him. Hey, listen, what do you think about this? You could disagree with him. You can agree with him. It don’t really matter what the issue is. There’s some mean motherfuckers. Gay and mean. 100 percent. Calvin Thomas says, damn, how many jobs you didn’t have? Man, I’m 40. I’ve been working since I was 16.

I’m 43. How many jobs haven’t you had? Ain’t you supposed to have a lot of jobs? Ain’t you supposed to job hop and figure it out when you’re younger before you get that good job?
[tr:trw].

See more of The Millionaire Morning Show w/ Anton Daniels on their Public Channel and the MPN The Millionaire Morning Show w/ Anton Daniels channel.