Donald Trump still made it a point of emphasis. Take a look. Every one of those cases was started by them against their political opponent and I’m winning most of them and I will win the rest on appeal and you saw that with the decision that came down just recently from the Supreme Court. I’m winning most of them but those are cases it’s called weaponization. Never happened in this country. They weaponized the Justice Department. Every one of those cases was involved with the DOJ from Atlanta and Fawny Willis to the Attorney General of New York and the DA in New York.

Every one of those cases and then they say oh he was he’s a criminal. They’re the ones that made them go after me. It’s weaponization and they used it and it’s never happened in this country. They used it to try and win an election. They’re fake cases. All right joining us now someone who knows firsthand about the weaponization of justice live from the spin room Robert F Kennedy Jr. Great to see you. How are you? Good to see you Sean. You left your party. A party that that was near and dear to your father to your uncle.

I think it has no resemblance to the Democratic Party today and this is the frustrating part about tonight the radicalization the views stated by Kamala. You know they weren’t asked by the by the moderators. To me it was it was a failed opportunity. I think the American people were failed tonight. Yeah I was disappointed by that. The evident bias of the moderators who were fact checking constantly kind of trivialities by President Trump. But didn’t as far as I saw that in fact check Vice President Harris single time. But you’re right Sean.

The party that I grew up in doesn’t exist anymore. The party of Robert Kennedy and John Kennedy was a party of peace. It was the party of resisting the corporate subversion of American democracy. It was the party of civil rights and constitutional rights particularly censorship area opposed to censorship and surveillance. It was the party of protecting the most vulnerable people in our society including particularly children. Today the Democratic Party is the party of war. It’s the party of censorship. It’s the party of surveillance. We saw Dick Cheney and John Bolton endorse along with 255 neocons endorse President Vice President Harris this week.

They came out of exile where they were sent after the Patriot Act. They were sent after the war in Iraq the biggest foreign policy debacle in American history. And they’re not endorsing President Vice President Harris because they’ve changed their minds. They’re endorsing her because she represents their world view more censorship more war more surveillance and less liberty and constitutional rights a lot in the course of your campaign. They talk about democracy and peril but everything the entire force of the Democratic establishment if you will they just they just went in for the political you know death of of your campaign.

They did not want you to get they didn’t want you to get a first base you know that’s the other ballot. That’s the other thing is that they’ve abandoned democracy. At the Democratic Party is now about centralized control. It’s about losing faith in the demos the people and about abolishing elections abolishing our ability to hear different points of view to hear dissent. I’m in my case of course they got rid of the primaries. They literally abolished many of the primaries so that President Biden wouldn’t have to debate me wouldn’t have to run against me.

Let me let me dip in I guess Kamala is that one of her watch parties or something. I don’t know what she’s saying. Let’s just dip in for a second. And let me just say that I think we all know that tonight was a night that highlights something that you all have been working so hard on. We have folks here who have been knocking on doors. Well you know we but we have a lot of work to do. OK. And tonight I think highlighted for the American people what’s at stake. I started the debate by talking about it and it became a parent I think throughout those dead about an hour and a half.

So obviously she’s going to go out there and her team. The thing that I learned about her tonight is you know being hidden away for days and days and days on end. You can learn your rehearsed lines. And it doesn’t matter if you tell the truth because she wasn’t back checked. She told a lot of lies about Trump in 2025 lies about mandatory gun buybacks which she did. Lies about it. Lying about fracking lying about a national abortion ban that Donald Trump doesn’t support. And you know it’s hard when when you’ve got three on one like that.

But that’s what I expect. We’re now she’s been in this campaign 50 days. We only have 56 days to election day but early voting for example I’ve been pointing out tonight starts right here one week from tonight. There’s a lot of information about her stated views in her own words that people don’t know about. What would you advise the people to get the most and most telling part of the debate to me which she didn’t get fact checked on the first question. Are Americans better off than they were four years ago. There’s no metric you can use to make that case.

And she was allowed to then go and give this kind of biographical sketch of herself without ever asking that question. And they never demanded that she ask it today. Hey Sean Hannity here and he’s 100 percent right. They never demanded that that she ever answer the question. She was never fact checked. And again I think that the biggest travesty of this whole debate because it took it took the highlight off of the actual candidates and it started to place visibility on the actual moderators. Let me say that again. The debate wasn’t even about the candidates.

It was about the moderators. That’s unfortunate. A debate should never be about the people that host a debate. It should never be about the people that ask the questions. You’re supposed to be there in order to get the most out of the people that are saying whatever it is that they’re saying on the stage. And again sorority sister, beta male. The very first question set the precedent and I realized that he was basically and shout out to Trump. Let me give a round of applause to Trump and JD Vance. And the reason that I want to give a shout out to Trump and JD Vance is because they have regularly throughout this entire campaign.

You know what? Let me take something back. They have regularly throughout this this entire campaign went in the enemy territory. They did the debate on CNN. They did debate on ABC. They go and take all the questions from NBC, ABC, CNN. They appear on any platforms. No scripts stand in front of the reporters and take all questions. Trump even appeared at the National Association of Black Journalists which Kamala declined to go to. But here’s the thing. At first I was thinking to myself, first I was thinking to myself, man this is a loss for ABC.

They absolutely ruined it. Their moderators was trash. They put somebody up there to ask questions that is a sorority sister and it absolutely went left for them. But then I started to thinking it just popped in my hair right now. Maybe this was a win for ABC. Not a win because it actually did a good job, but a win because they accomplished what they looked to accomplish which was to paint this a certain way, not to be down the middle, not to be objective, but to push a narrative and to absolutely lead y’all down this pathway of destruction that’s not in your best interest.

Maybe ABC’s goal the whole time was to either A, get back at Trump, or B, to lean more into the left and so it was impossible for them to not be biased. It was impossible for them to be objective. It was impossible for them to not to be slanted or go one way. How could they? Why would they? Every future debate I believe needs to be in somewhere of a neutral territory. Maybe PBS could do it. Maybe Reuters can do it. Maybe the Associated Press can host it. Maybe just YouTube can host it or something like that.

But my point is is that we got to change the way that this stuff happens because if you can’t just let the stuff lay where it may and let the people say what they, you know, the candidates say what they want to say and then just leave it out there for the people to determine and make their own decision. If everything is slanted one way and you’re unable to be objective in your questioning, now I’m not talking about your assessment. I’m not talking about in the after hours. I’m not talking about in your commentary afterwards or whatever.

I’m talking about when you have the people there to ask the question and let them answer it objectively, then you compromise. So maybe ABC did win it. [tr:trw].

See more of The Millionaire Morning Show w/ Anton Daniels on their Public Channel and the MPN The Millionaire Morning Show w/ Anton Daniels channel.