➡ Ron Partain, host of the untold History Channel, narrates a Friday night watch party on a documentary related to a book he purchased recently about controversial theories discussing JFK’s and RFK’s assassinations. Topics include connections with Mossad, the assassination of Dallas police officer Officer Tippit and the likelihood of Robert Kennedy succeeding his brother as President had they not both been assassinated.
➡ The text narrates the close bond between John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert Kennedy, highlighting their shared political vision and Robert’s influential role in supporting the civil rights movement. After John’s assassination, Robert, feeling a sense of destiny, ran for President in 1968, hoping to carry on his brother’s legacy. However, his sudden assassination has raised questions about similarities and intrigues in both Kennedy brothers’ deaths, with speculations about a shared conspiratorial force behind them.
➡ The speaker watched a lengthy video that included revelations about the Liberty and Nixon, sparking excitement and intrigue in them. They express gratitude for a large online gathering during a Friday Night Watch party. Despite being unsure about the following day’s plans due to a possible Thanksgiving dinner with a friend and an eye issue, they assure listeners of a return to complete an unspecified book, and wish everyone a good night and safe travels.
➡ Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, the alleged assassin of Robert Kennedy, was a 24-year-old Jordanian who harbored a hatred for Israel, motivated by Kennedy’s support for the country. However, contradictions in the forensic evidence indicate that Sirhan may not have been the actual shooter or may have been in a trance-like state during the assassination; thus questioning the main narrative that presents Sirhan as a lone assassin whose act was a precursor of Islamic terrorism.
➡ Siran has been diagnosed with genuine amnesia and was documented to be under the influence of hypnotic programming at the time of Robert F. Kennedy’s assassination. Professor Daniel Brown at Harvard University confirmed after extensive interviews that Siran acted involuntarily, responding to hypnotic cues and was coerced into shooting through hypnotic conditioning. This has raised theories around the possibility of third-party involvement, citing parallels with contemporary military attempts at mental control.
➡ Oswald has long been viewed as a mere instrument used by conspirators to assassinate JFK, with the plot often attributed to the CIA and an extremist faction within the Pentagon. This theory, propelled by mainstream media and Hollywood, potentially overshadows the possibility of Israeli involvement and fails to account for the lack of action taken against Cuba post-assassination, indicating other motivations behind Kennedy’s murder.
➡ Jack Ruby, who assassinated Lee Harvey Oswald, was linked to Jewish connections that suggest a larger conspiracy. JFK’s 1967 Dallas assassination appears interwoven with Israeli interests, as seen in power business group Dallas Citizens Council, influenced by Jewish businessmen. Evidence proposes JFK was opposing Israel’s development of nuclear weapons, pressuring them to cease the program. After JFK’s assassination, American foreign policy pivoted towards increasing support for Israel. This information suggests a potential Israeli involvement in JFK’s assassination, yet this theory is rarely discussed or recognized.
➡ This summary discusses the theories linking Lyndon Johnson and his connections with Israel to the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Evidence suggests Johnson, benefiting from the murder, utilized high-ranked accomplices in Dallas and in the Navy where he had influence, to prepare for and conceal the assassination. Jack Ruby, who supposedly killed JFK’s assassin, had implied he knew of Johnson’s involvement. Johnson’s loyalty to Israel, potentially rooted in his Jewish ancestry, also ties into the narrative, as he provided Israel with continuous support and allowed them to acquire the atomic bomb between 1965 and 1967.
➡ The text recounts the controversy surrounding the USS Liberty incident during the Six Day War in 1967 where Israel, surprisingly, attacked this American vessel resulting in 34 deaths and multiple casualties. The act, initially reported as a mistake, was allegedly covered up by then President Johnson and has since been referred to as a false flag operation, with claims that Israel intended to blame Egypt to draw American involvement in the war.
➡ The text discusses the bombing of a ship by Israelis which resulted in numerous American deaths. The incident was covered up by the U.S. and Israeli governments, which further strengthened their relationship. It also suggests that subsequent American leaders were influenced by pro-Israeli advisors, impacting U.S. foreign policy. Additionally, it explores the speculated involvement of the Israeli deep state in the assassinations of John and Robert Kennedy. The text ends by praising John F. Kennedy’s resistance to Israeli influence, outlining the importance of investigating these issues to expose the truth behind U.S.-Israeli relations.
not available

Welcome to the untold History Channel. My name is Ron Partain and welcome back. It is time. It is time for the Friday night watch party. Friday night watch party. And we are going to be treated to something very special. So apparently in in fact, let me find something here. Let’s see here. Lauren. I want to look for the guy’s name Laurent Gaynol. I don’t know if I’m pronouncing that correctly, but there’s a book that he has written.

I want to find it on Amazon. I just want to find it. Okay, I’m going to bring it over and share it here. My computer didn’t like that too much, did it? Okay, so let me share the screen here. It’s called the unspoken truth. And I actually purchased this book yesterday. You purchased this edition November 23. That was yesterday because I watched the documentary, and apparently the book it talks about the content is RFK’s false Flag Assassination JFK and the Samsung Option LBJ Israel’s Best Friend jack Ruby gangster for Zion jim Engleton mossad CIA Agent joe the Cursed Peacemaker JFK Jr.

The slain Prince Forrestal Kennedy’s foreshadow and the coup that enslaved America. So anyway, I ordered that book yesterday, so I’m hoping that I get it here pretty soon. It was written June 1 of 2021, and apparently the same guy who wrote the book is the guy who put together the video here. Now, I went and searched for the video yesterday and I was trying to find the highest resolution copy that I could find because that’s typically what I do.

A lot of you guys probably don’t know that literally when I find videos, I download hard copies of the videos, whether they’re YouTube, whether they’re butchered, whether they’re whatever. I have an enormous amount of storage capacity on my computer and I do that on purpose because I want to be able to have a hard copy of the video if anything were ever to happen. So if the video gets pulled down for some OD reason, whatever, I have a hard copy of it and I do that a lot.

So I have a very large collection of videos that I have downloaded because I want to make sure that I have a copy of it and it doesn’t get like memory holed into perpetuity. So you know what, Manny, I don’t know if it’s true that Kennedy had a know, I think it’s probably true that many politicians have doubles. You know what? Since you’re going to say that, since you’re going to say a double, let’s do this here.

Let’s see here. Speaking of doubles, it okay. Here we go. So this is a picture of John F. Kennedy doesn’t want to load. This is a picture of John F. Kennedy. And this picture on the right is Officer Paul Tibbets, and he was a police officer in Dallas and he was killed, shockingly, on November 22, 1963. And if you put them side by side that’s what they look like.

This is Officer Tippett. And this is John F. Kennedy. So a lot of you didn’t see have never seen that before. Just a little interesting ted bed of information on that. So a lot of you guys I’m talking about talking about Officer Tippett, the gentleman on the here, let me pull this back up here, guys, because so this right here is John F. Kennedy’s picture. And this is Officer Tippett.

Now. Officer Tippett was hello? Meg. Mom. I am very happy to have you. It is well, we’re not going to watch a movie. I do watch movies, but generally I do something to where if the movie it’s relative to history or relative to how things operate in the government and whatnot. But tonight is going to be an interesting one. But somebody asked me about a double. And this is a picture of Kennedy on the left, and this is a picture of a Dallas police officer by the name of Officer Tippett Tippit.

And he was murdered the exact same day in Dallas just before Kennedy was. And if you put their faces together, that’s what they look like. Anyway, that said, let’s do the Watch party and watch a documentary about a Mossad and Zionist connection with the assassination of John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy. Okay, where’s the OD reason it closed? All right, here we go, guys. Ask not what your country can do for you.

Ask what you can do for your country. President Kennedy died at 01:00 P. m. . Vice actually, I’m going to start it again here real quick because there was something that I wanted to say beforehand. I searched for a lot of copies of this, and the one that I found, everything that I found was like an hour and 26 minutes. And this one was an hour and 36 minutes.

And I tried to find the differences and I think I found the differences on this one because this one actually incorporated about ten minutes of extra footage in relation to the USS Liberty, which I think was a very good call. So the one that I’m showing you, if you go and you just do a search for this documentary, you’re going to find it out there, but they’re all going to be an hour and 26 minutes.

This one has, like, ten minutes of extra footage. So I found one that was just a little bit better, or at least I thought it was a little bit better. So just wanted to make that quick notation. All right, I’m going to start it brand new. Here we go. Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country. President Kennedy died at 01:00 p.

m vice. President Johnson has become the 36th president of the United States. I didn’t shoot anybody, sir. I haven’t been told what I’m here for. I’m just a patsy. Supporters of Israel’s nuclear weapons program were in fact involved in the JFK assassination. There’s only one person in the world John Kennedy trusted unequivocally, and that was Robert Kennedy. Obviously I was there, but I don’t remember any of that.

Just after midnight on the 6 June 1968, senator Robert Kennedy, candidate to the presidency of the United States, was shot in a back room of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. He had just been celebrating his victory at the California primaries, which made him the most likely Democratic nominee for the presidential election, in which a lot of people and this is a feeling you had for the film robert would probably have won against the Republican candidate, Richard Nixon, at the age of 43.

He would have become the youngest American president ever after being the youngest Attorney General. His death opened the way for Richard Nixon, who could finally become president eight years after being beaten by John F. Kennedy. John had been assassinated four years and a half before Robert. Had he survived, he would probably have been president until 1968 and his brother might have succeeded him. Instead of that, John’s, vice President Lyndon Johnson took over the White House in 1963.

He became so unpopular that he retired in 1968. Interestingly, Johnson became President the very day of John’s death and ended his term a few months after Robert’s death. He was in power at the time of both investigations. Both investigations are widely regarded as cover ups. In each case, the official conclusion is rife with contradictions. We are going to sum them up in this film, but we will do more.

We will show that the key to solving both cases resides in the link between them, and we will solve them beyond a reasonable doubt. Strangely, we rarely hear about the Kennedy assassinations as a plural. John’s death in 1963 and Roberts in 1968 are generally treated as two unconnected tragedies rather than as serial murders. When both killings are connected, it is by the nonsensical notion of a curse on the Kennedy family rather than by the hypothesis of a common commissioner.

This theme of the Kennedy curse, in which is included the plane accident that caused the life to John Kennedy, Jr. Is often associated to the alleged sins of John and Robert’s father, Joseph Kennedy. A more rational explanation must take into account that John and Robert were more than just brothers. They were connected by an unshakable loyalty. All Kennedy biographers stress the absolute dedication of Robert to his elder brother.

Robert had successfully managed John’s campaign for the Senate in 1952, then his presidential campaign in 1960. John was deeply grateful for his support. Great appreciation to my brother Bobby, who has directed all our primary campaigns and the organization in all of them, as he did in my campaign for the Senate in 1952. And of course, he has been the most essential figure at the White House. John made Bobby not only his Attorney General but also his most trusted advisor, even on matters of foreign or military affairs.

He insisted, for example, on having him nearby during the whole Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. Traditionally, Attorneys General have nothing to do with foreign policy. But after the Bay of Pigs, john Kennedy really wanted Bobby by his side, helping him to make the decisions on everything. Because there was only one person in the world that John Kennedy trusted unequivocally, and that was Robert Kennedy. Robert and John’s communion of spirit struck their collaborators.

No sooner one of them began a sentence than the other knew what he was saying. They understood each other so well that they talked in a kind of shorthand. Yet Robert was very different from John. He was a sincerely religious man, devoted to his family. He had got married at the age of 24, long before his elder brother with his wife Ethel, also a devout Catholic, he fathered eleven children.

My mother and my father shared a belief that we are on earth for a short period of time and that we are actually children of God. We prayed every night that John Kennedy would be the best president ever and that my father would be the best Attorney General ever. What John most appreciated in Robert was his sense of justice and the integrity of his moral judgment. It is Robert, for example, who encouraged John to fully endorse the cause of the black civil rights movement.

We are confronted primarily with a moral issue. It is as old as the scriptures and is as clear as the American Constitution. The heart of the question is whether all Americans are to be afforded equal rights and equal opportunities. Whether we are going to treat our fellow Americans as we want to be treated was proper. The first time in the history of our country that an American president would say that they questioned the civil rights to question a race.

It was a moral issue, and he had the encouragement of Robert Kennedy to push him in this direction. Robert Kennedy was learning. He was growing. He said to me, John, I now understand the young people have educated me and you can see it, you can feel it. And Robert Kennedy, during that period, became so convinced, not just as a politician, not just as the Attorney General, but as a human being, there was time for that to be some major steps to end racial discrimination in America.

Robert neither possessed John’s charisma nor his ambition after John’s death. He felt that his brother’s coat, which he had literally worn during his first month of mourning, was too big for him. When he finally decided to run for President in 1968, it was out of a sense of destiny to take up the torch of his brother’s legacy. Robert knew that he was, in the eyes of millions of Americans, the legitimate heir to the murdered king as well as his avenger.

His public appearances led to displays of enthusiasm never seen before for a presidential candidate, and his total lack of concern for his own security only increased his prestige. What sounded like shots turned out to be Chinese firecrackers. Bobby flinched, then went right on campaigning. Given the exceptional bond between the Kennedy brothers and the unity between their presidential destinies, what are the odds that their assassinations were unrelated? Common sense suggests that they were killed by the same force and for the same motives, and that Robert was eliminated from the presidential race because he had to be prevented from reaching a position where he could reopen.

The case of his brother’s death. Was there in 1968. Any objective reason to believe that he intended to do that? That is the first question we must answer. Did Robert Kennedy plan to reopen the investigation on drug vaccination? That question has been positively answered by David Talbot in his book brothers the hidden history of the Kennedy years, published in 2007 by Simon and Chester. Talbot shows that Robert had never believed, in the conclusion of the Warren Commission report, that Lerve Oswald was the sole assassin of his brother.

His son, Robert Kennedy Jr. Recently confirmed it. Knowing what to expect from Johnson, Robert had refused to testify before the Warren Commission, but he was compelled to write a statement saying that he knew of, quote, no credible evidence to support the allegations that the assassination of President Kennedy was caused by a domestic or foreign conspiracy, end of quote. To his close friends, who asked him why he wouldn’t voice his doubt publicly, he said, There is nothing I can do about it.

Not now. Robert was alienated and closely monitored by the new president, Lyndon Johnson, and his friend, FBI Director Edgar Hoover. Although still officially Attorney General, he knew he was powerless against the forces that had killed his brother. Yet Robert lost no time to start his own investigation. A mere week after JFK’s death, November 29, bill Walton, a friend of the Kennedys, traveled to Moscow and passed to Nikita Khruchev, via a trusted agent, a message from Robert and Jacqueline Kennedy.

According to the memo found in the Soviet archives in the 1990s by Alexander Furosenko and Timothy Naftali, robert and Jackie wanted to inform the Soviet leader that they believed John Kennedy had been, quote, the victim of a right wing conspiracy, that only RFK could implement John Kennedy’s vision and that the cooling that might occur in US. Soviet relations because of John’s son would not last forever. At the same time, Robert started his own investigations.

He first asked CIA Director John Macon, a Kennedy friend, to find out if rogue agents within the agency had anything to do with the plot. Then, in March 1964, suspecting a vengeance from organized crime, he contacted Mobster Jimmy Ofa, his sworn enemy, whom he had battled for ten years and whom he suspected of having taken revenge on his brother. A face to face encounter was organized between the two men on an airport runway and Robert came out convinced of OPHA’s innocence.

Robert also asked his friend Daniel Moynihan to search for any complicity in the Secret Service responsible for the President’s security. With the publication of the Warren Commission report, robert had the confirmation that he could not expect anything from his government as long as Johnson was in power. He also knew that his own investigations were under surveillance. He contacted a former Mi Six officer that he knew from the time his father had been ambassador in London.

This British officer, in turn, contacted some trusted friends in France. With the tacit support of Charles de Gaulle, arrangements were made for two French intelligence operatives to conduct, over a three year period a quiet investigation that involved hundreds of interviews in the United States. Their report, replete with innuendo about Lyndon Johnson and right wing Texas oil barons was delivered to Bobby Kennedy only a month before his own assassination in June of 1968.

After Bobby’s death, the last surviving brother, Senator Ted Kennedy, showed no interest in the material. The investigators then hired a French writer to edit the material into a book under the pen name of James Hebber. The book was first published in French under the title La Merid Brulee then in English under the title Farewell America. Robert Kennedy had planned to run for the American presidency in 1972. But the escalation of the Vietnam War precipitated his decision to run in 1968.

I am announcing today my candidate for the presidency of the United States. Another factor may have been the opening of the investigation by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison in 1967. Garrison was allowed to view Abram Zaprul’s eight millimeter film confiscated by the FBI on the day of the assassination. This film, despite evident tempering, shows that the fatal shot came from the front of the president and therefore not from the schoolbook depository located behind him where Oswald was supposed to be shooting from.

I looked at the wound again. I wanted to know and remember this the rest of my life. And the rest of my life I will always know. He was shot from the front. The Warren Commission investigation concluded the shots came only from behind. Dr. Crenshaw says they’re wrong. The bullet struck about where and passed about where? From here. Right through. Although the official report suppressed their testimonies many witnesses said that shots were fired from behind a fence on what is known as the gracinol, which was on the right front of the limousine at the moment of the shooting.

Shot came from behind the wooden fence. There’s no doubt whatsoever in my mind. Garrison would later claim that Robert gave him a discreet message of support through a common friend, letting him know that he was going to, quote, blow the whole thing wide open when he is president. Robert also confided to his friend William Atwood, then editor of Luke magazine that he, like Gary Sun, suspected a conspiracy, but that he couldn’t do anything until he gets control of the White House.

In conclusion, there can be little doubt that had he been elected President, robert Kennedy would have done everything possible to reopen the case of his brother’s assassination in one way or another. This certainly did not escape John’s murderers. They had no other option but to stop him. This first conclusion is a sufficient reason to conduct a comparative analysis of both Kennedy assassinations in search of some converging clues that might lead us on the track of a common mastermind.

Let us begin with Robert’s assassination, and let us first focus on the very special profile of his alleged killer. Just hours after Robert’s assassination, the press was able to inform the American people not only of the identity of the assassin, but also of his motive and even of his detailed biography. 24 year old Siran Bishara Siran was born in Jordania and had moved to the United States when his family had been expelled from West Jerusalem in 1948.

After the shooting, a newspaper clipping was found in Siran’s pocket, quoting a favorable statement made by Robert Kennedy regarding the selling of military aircraft to Israel. Handwritten notes by Siran, found in a notebook at his home confirmed that his act had been premeditated and motivated by his hatred of Israel. That became the storyline of the mainstream media from day one. Jerry Cohen of the Los Angeles Times wrote a front page article saying that Siran is, quote, and a young man with a supreme hatred for the State of Israel.

Cohen infers that Senator Kennedy became a personification of that hatred because of his recent proisraeli statements. Cohen further claimed to have learned from Los Angeles Mayor Samuel Yorti that about three weeks before shooting Robert Kennedy, Siran wrote a memo to himself saying Kennedy must be assassinated before June 568. That is the first anniversary of the Six Day War, in which Israel humiliated three Arab neighbors egypt, Syria and Jordan.

After September 11, 2001, Americans were reminded of Syran as a precursor of Islamic terrorism on the American soil, and his act was installed into the war on terror. Mythology and propaganda. In a book entitled The Forgotten Terrorist, Male Ayton, who specializes in debunking conspiracy theories, claims to present, quote, a wealth of evidence about syran’s fanatical Palestinian nationalism and to demonstrate that Iran was a lone assassin whose politically motivated act was a forerunner of present day terrorism.

End of quote. In 2008, on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of Bobby’s murder, the Jewish Daily Forward wrote robert Kennedy was the first American victim of modern Arab terrorism. One cannot help but note the parallel between Kennedy’s assassination and the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In both tragic cases, Arab fanaticism reared its ugly head on American soil, irrevocably changing the course of events in this country.

End of quote. Writing for the Boston Globe, Sasha isenberg recalled that the death of Robert Kennedy was, quote, a first taste of the political violence in the Middle East. He quotes Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz as saying it was perceived as an act of violence motivated by hatred of Israel and of anybody who supported Israel. It was in some ways the beginning of Islamic terrorism in America. It was the first shot, end of quote.

The fact that Syran was from a Christian family was lost on Dershevitz. The Jewish forward took care to mention it, only to add that Islamic fanaticism ran in his veins anyway, quote but what he shared with his Muslim cousins, the perpetrators of September 11, was a visceral irrational hatred of Israel. There is something suspicious in this insistence on making the assassination of Robert Kennedy a crime against Israel.

But let us, for the moment, take these declarations seriously and let us try to understand what kind of anti Zionist Palestinian terrorist was Iran Siran. While studying his case more closely, perhaps we can learn something about the very nature of the Arab terrorism that has now become a familiar light motive of the mainstream narrative in our post 911 world. The first question is did Cyran really kill Robert Kennedy? And forensic evidence show that in fact, none of Cyran’s bullets hit Kennedy.

According to the autopsy report of Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Thomas Noguchi, who confirms it in his memoirs, robert Kennedy was hit by three bullets, while a fourth went through his coat. All these bullets were shot from behind Kennedy, two of them under his right armpit following an upward angle, and the third, the fatal bullet behind his right ear at point blank range. One gunshot wound was found behind right ear and there were abundance of a powder deposit on the edge of the right ear.

And after test firing the similar weapon, we came to conclusion that the muzzle distance would be yet. The sworn testimonies of twelve witnesses established that Robert had never turned his back on Siran, and that Siran was five to 6ft away from his target when he fired. Moreover, Siran was physically overpowered by Carl Uker after his second shot, and although he continued pressing the trigger mechanically, his revolver was then not directed towards Kennedy.

By tallying all the bullet impacts in the pantry and those that wounded five people around Kennedy, it can be established that at least twelve bullets were fired while Siran’s gun carried only eight. Finally, a computer analysis of audio recordings during the shooting made by engineer Philip Van Prague in 2008 confirms that two guns are heard. 13 shot sounds over a little bit over a five second interval of time.

There are two shots and then a pause of about one and a third seconds and then a flurry of succeeding shots. The primary point that people need to recall is that the capacity of Sirhan’s gun was eight shots. He did not have time to reload. And so anything more than eight shots proves there had to be a second gun firing within that kitchen pantry, period. We have strong evidence, based upon this audiotape, of 13 shots, two double shots, the make and the model of the gun, and the directionality of those shots into the back of Robert Kennedy.

All this evidence has been gathered by attorney William Pepper in a 58 page file submitted in 2011 to the court of California with a request that Siran’s case be reopened. Bob was hit with four bullets were fired at him from the rear. From the rear. Now two went through, one through the shoulder pad and one through the chest cavity that lodged in a ceiling tile that was actually behind Sirhan where Serhan was standing.

So the shots from the Senator were from behind, and the tracing of the bullets was slightly upward. So that’s where the assassin was firing, and that’s where he was standing behind the Senator. And we have a view as to who that person was, but a good deal more probing and evidentiary work has to be done. If siran did not kill Robert Kennedy, then who did? The presence of a second shooter was indicated by several witnesses and reported on the same day by a few news outlets.

There are strong suspicions that the second shooter was Thane Eugene Caesar, a security guard hired for the evening by the hotel ambassador owned by Maya Shine. Caesar was stuck behind Kennedy at the time of shooting. Several witnesses saw him draw his pistol, and one of them, Don Schulman, positively saw him fire. As we were slowly pushed forward, another man stepped out and he shot. Just then, the guard who was standing behind Kennedy took out his gun and he fired also.

The next thing I knew is that Kennedy was shot three times. Now how far was Sir Han from Senator Kennedy at the time? I would say approximately from three to 6ft. Where was this guard who was firing his gun? He was standing directly to the side and back of Kennedy. On what side? He was standing on the right hand side. Contract killer could not find a more efficient and concealed position to do his deed.

First, a clear opening to shoot at the heart with little chance to be seen by witnesses situated either in front of or behind the victim. Then another opportunity for a concealed coup de cross in the back of the head as the victim slumps to the floor. Incredibly, Caesar’s weapon was never examined and he was never interrogated, even though he did not conceal his hatred for the Kennedys. He told police he had sold his.

22 three months before the assassination. A receipt proves that it was sold after the assassination. The person who made out this receipt confirmed Caesar told him at the time of the sale, be careful of this weapon. It was involved in a police shooting. He was the obvious first suspect. The police brushed him off and never investigated him further. Even if we assume that Siran was the assassin of Robert Kennedy, another aspect of the case raises question.

According to several witnesses, siran seemed to be in a state of trance during the shooting and in a state of disorientation just after. More importantly, Siran has always claimed that he has never had any recollection of his act, even though, on the suggestion of his attorney, he admitted to have done it. For this, he was sentenced to death penalty. But a death penalty was abolished in California soon after, and his sentence was turned into life imprisonment 50 years after.

The facts Siran continues to claim. However, I not only have never been able to remember what happened in that place at that time, but I have not been able to remember many things and incidents which took place in the weeks leading up to the shooting. What do you remember about the shooting, if you’re willing to talk about that? Obviously I was there, but I don’t remember the exact moment.

Don’t remember pulling my gun out of my body or whatever it was located, and I don’t remember aiming it at any human being. I don’t remember any of that. Since 1968, several psychiatric analyses, including lie detector tests, have confirmed that Siran’s amnesia is not faked. Therefore, experts in hypnosis and mental manipulation believe that Siran has been submitted to hypnotic programming. It was obvious that he had been programmed to kill Robert Kennedy and programmed to forget that he been programmed.

This hypothesis is consistent with some repetitive lines written in a notebook found in siren’s room, which are reminiscent of automatic writing. In 2008, Harvard University professor Daniel Brown, a noted expert in hypnosis and trauma memory loss, interviewed Siran for a total of 60 hours and concluded that Siran, who belongs to the category of high hypnotizables, acted involuntarily under the effect of hypnotic suggestion. His action of firing the gun was neither under his voluntary control nor done with conscious knowledge, but is likely a product of automatic hypnotic behavior and coercive control.

During his sessions with Dr. Brown, siran could remember having been accompanied by an attractive woman before suddenly finding himself in a shooting range with a weapon he did not know. According to Brown’s report, quote siran responded to a specific hypnotic cue given to him by that woman to enter range mode, during which Ciran automatically and involuntarily responded with a flashback that he was shooting at a firing range at circle targets, end of quote.

Month after Ciran recalled these details, attorney William Pepper was able to prove that just days before the assassination, Ciran had visited a firing range accompanied by an unknown instructor and had signed the register. With the help of Professor Brown, siran was also able to remember that his instructor had a falling mustache, which fits the description of famous hypnotist William Joseph Bryan, Jr. Whom other evidence also incriminates. Brian makes no.

Secret of having worked for the Air Force in the brainwashing section. His biggest claim to fame was to have exposed by hypnosis the Boston strangler Albert di Salvo, who thereafter confessed to the crime. Brian often bragged about it. This is significant because in the notebook found at Siren’s home, that Siren recognized to be in his own handwriting, but that he cannot remember having written. We find this god help me, please help me.

Salvo di Salvo di Salvo. It is surmise that he heard the name while under hypnosis. You have to have the person locked up physically to have control over them. You have to use a certain amount of physical torture involved. And there is also the use of long term hypnotic suggestion, probably drugs, whatever and so on. Under these situations where you have all this going for you, like the prison camp and so on, yes, you can brainwash a person to do just about anything.

What I’m speaking about are the innumerable instances that we ran into when I was running the country’s brainwashing and anti brainwashing programs. We know that in the 1960s american military agencies were experimenting on mental control. Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, son of Hungarian Jews, directed the infamous CIA MKUltra project, which, among other things, was trying to answer questions like can a person under hypnosis be forced to commit murder? According to a declassified document dated May 1951.

We also know that Cyran was attending meetings of occultist circles practicing mental experiments and this may have created opportunities to submit him to hypnotic programming. Israeli journalist Ronan Bergman has recently revealed that in May 1968, the month preceding Robert Kennedy’s assassination, the Aman, the Israeli military intelligence, was planning to assassinate Yasser Arafat by hypnotically programming a Palestinian. The idea was proposed by a Navy psychologist named Binyamin Shalit, who claimed that, quote if he was given a Palestinian prisoner, one of the thousands in Israeli jails with the right characteristics, he could brainwash and hypnotize him into becoming a programmed killer.

He would then be sent across the Jordan, join the Fatah there and when the opportunity arose, do away with Arafat, end of quote. The proposal was approved. Shalid selected a 28 year old Palestinian from Bethlehem whom he judged easily suggestionable the operation failed. But it proved that in 1968 precisely, israel was experimenting methods of assassination identical to the one used against Robert Kennedy in the hypothesis that siran, has been manipulated.

The question is why him who had an interest in having people believe that Robert was killed by a fanatic Palestinian motivated by hatred of Israel? Israel, of course. But then we are faced with a dilemma. For? Why would Israel kill Robert Kennedy? If Robert Kennedy was supportive of Israel, that would logically exclude Israel from the lease of suspect. The dilemma rests on a misleading assumption which is part of the deception.

In reality, Robert Kennedy was not pro Israel. He was simply in an electoral campaign as everyone knows a few good wishes and empty promises to Israel are an inescapable ritual. In such circumstances, Robert’s statements did not exceed the minimal requirements. It is claimed that Siran had in his pocket a newspaper clipping from the May 27 issue of Pasadena’s Independent Star News mentioning that Robert Kennedy had declared in an Oregon synagogue, quote the United States should without delay sell Israel the 50 phantom jets she has so long been promised.

End of quote. But the author of this article, David Lawrence, underlined how little credit should be given to Robert’s electoral promises. His article, entitled Paradoxical Bob, began like this presidential candidates are out to get votes and some of them do not realize their own inconsistencies. All things considered, there is no ground for believing that Robert Kennedy would have been, as President of the United States, particularly friendly to Israel.

The Kennedy family, proudly Irish and Catholic, was not known to be very appreciative of Jews. Joe Kennedy had been notoriously critical of Jewish influence during the Second World War. While ambassador in London from 1938 to 1940, he had supported the appeasement policy of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain toward Hitler. When Roosevelt was about to enter the war, he had resigned and declared that he intended, quote to devote my effort to what seems to me the greatest cause in the world today to help the President keep the US out of the war.

During John’s presidential campaign, Menaheim Begins Party erot wondered publicly if the father, Joe Kennedy, quote, did not inject some poisonous drops of antisemitism in the mind of his children. End of quote. In his pulp, surprise winning book Profiles in Courage, published in 1956, kennedy had declared his admiration for Senator Robert Taft, who, by calling the Nuremberg military trials of 1946 a shameful parody of justice, had sacrificed his political future.

We will talk later about John Kennedy’s tense relationship with the State of Israel. As for his brother, he had not been in his brother’s government. A particularly proisrael Attorney General, he had infuriated Zionist leaders by supporting an investigation led by Senator William Fulbright of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations aimed at registering the American Zionist Council as a foreign agent, subject to the obligations defined by the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, which would have considerably hindered its efficiency.

After the assassination of John Kennedy, the American Zionist Council escaped this procedure and its lobbying division, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, APAC, became the most powerful lobby in the United States and an indispensable instrument for the corruption and intimidation of American elected officials and for the control of American foreign policy. It was Nicholas Katzenbach whom Johnson put at the head of the Department of justice to replace Robert Kennedy, who buried the case against the American Zionist Council.

Katzenbach is also known as having strongly recommended to the new President, Lyndon Johnson, a Commission of inquiry to establish as soon as possible that Oswald was the only assassin of Kennedy. In conclusion, it is only by an outrageous hypocrisy that the Jewish Daily Forward could write on June 6, 2008 quote in remembering Bobby Kennedy, let us remember not just what he lived for, but also what he died for, namely, the precious nature of the American Israeli relationship.

End of quote. Robert Kennedy’s death had not been a bad thing for the American Israeli relationship. As a us. President, would Robert have saved Israel from disaster in 1973, like Nixon and Kissinger, by providing her with unlimited military support against Egypt? It is unlikely. Rather, Robert Kennedy was a great loss for the Arab world, as had his brother John before him. Of course, the fact that the Zionist media lied when granting Robert Kennedy some kind of posthumous certificate of goodwill towards Israel, and thereby provided Israel with a kind of fake alibi, is not a sufficient reason for accusing Israel of having murdered Robert.

Even the fact that the masterminds of the plot chose as their programmed instrument an anti Zionist Palestinian and thereby stirred a strong anti Palestinian feeling among Americans at the same time as getting rid of Robert, does not prove that Israel was involved. What is lacking for a serious presumption is a plausible motive. And the motive of Robert’s assassination, as we said before, must be found not in what Robert was declaring publicly during his campaign, but rather in what he confided only to his close friends his intention to reopen the investigation on his brother’s death.

What would an unbiased investigation conducted under the supervision of Robert in the White House have revealed? This is what we must now determine. It is obvious for any person, even vaguely informed, that a genuine investigation would prove that Oswald was only the unwilling instrument of the plotters, a scapegoat prepared in advance to be blamed for the crime and then be slaughtered without a trial. We will not here review the evidence which contradicts the official thesis of The Lone Gunner.

They can be found in numerous other books and films. Just as notorious is the theory according to which the plot to kill Kennedy originated from the CIA, or rather from a secret network within the CIA, in collusion with extremist elements in the Pentagon. That thesis looms the largest among conspiracy theories found in books, articles and films that have been produced for 50 years since the Kennedy assassination. Rather than examining one by one all the arguments of this theory, we shall here trace back its origin.

If the trail of the CIA is such a well trodden path among Kennedy researchers, it is because it has been cut and marked by the mainstream media themselves, as well as by Hollywood. And that began even before the assassination, on October 2, 1963, with an article in the Washington Daily News picked up by the New York Times chief Washington correspondent, Arthur Croc. The article denounced the CIA’s unrestrained thirst for power and quoted an unnamed very high official who claimed that, quote, even the White House could not control it any longer and that if the United States ever experiences an attempt at a coup to overthrow the government, it will come from the CIA and not from the Pentagon.

Without saying so, Croc was letting his readers believe that the very high official whom he quoted was none other than the President himself, who was sending a message to the public via the press in such a way. The New York Times was planting a sign a month and a half before the Dallas killing pointing to the CIA as the most likely instigator of the upcoming coup. The sign said the President is going to fall victim of a coup and this will come from the CIA.

In the 1970s, the mainstream media and publishing houses again played a major role in steering conspiracy theorists toward the CIA trail while avoiding any hint of Israeli involvement. One major contributor to that effort was the Israeli American Alan Weberman, a close associate to Jewish Defense Organization. With his 1975 book, Coup d’ETA in America the CIA and the Assassination of John F. Kennedy, coauthored by Michael Canfield. Weberman acknowledged Richard Pearl’s assistance in his investigation.

This book contributed to the momentum that led the House Select Committee on Assassinations to reinvestigate in 1976 the murders of JFK and Dr. Martin Luther King with a special focus on the CIA and organized crime. It is also in this context that Newsweek journalist Edward J. Epstein published an interview of George de Morinchild, a Russian geologist and consultant for Texan Oilman who had befriended Oswald and his Russian wife in Dallas in 1962.

De Morinchild admitted that Oswald was introduced to him at the instigation of a CIA agent. The problem is that de Morinchild was in no position to confirm or deny the words that Epstein ascribed to him. He was found dead a few hours after giving the interview. De Morinchild’s death was ruled a suicide. The sheriff’s report mentions that in his last month he complained that, quote the Jews and the Jewish mafia were out to get him.

Needless to say, Epistein didn’t mention anything about this. We should also mention author Mark Lane Levin by his real name. He was the first to incriminate the FBI and the CIA directly in his articles and then in a 1966 book, Rush to Judgment, which received considerable media coverage. Lane was adamant that the CIA was a culprit. In his last book, published in 2011, Last Word my indictment of the CIA in the murder of JFK that Israeli agents have been instrumental in spreading conspiracy theories targeting the CIA has become evident with Oliver Stone’s film JFK, released in 1991, starring Kevin Costner in the role of District Attorney Jim Garrison.

This film, which shook public opinion to the point of motivating the president. John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 was produced by Arnon Milchan, described in a 2011 biography as being from a youth quote, one of the most important current agents that Israeli intelligence has ever fielded. Milchan was working in particular to boost Israel’s nuclear program. In 2013, Milchan publicly revealed his extended activity as a secret agent of Israel.

It is therefore no wonder that Stone’s film gives no hint of the Mossad connection that Garrison had stumbled upon. All these examples demonstrate that the charges against the CIA have been the subject of considerable investment by authors who are predominantly Jewish and benefited from an effective eco chamber in the mainstream press. The mainstream news and entertainment industry engaged in double dealing while ostensibly defending the official theory of the lone gunner on the front page that channeled the skeptic scrutiny towards the CIA.

This is a typical strategy of Israel occupying the ground of protest and creating a rigged debate, excluding any reference to Israel. The contradiction of the official thesis is maintained focus on the CIA, the military industrial complex, or any other 100% American organization by an elite of militants whose primary motivation is the preservation of the interest of the Jewish community. In fact, the CIA conspiracy theory suffers from a crippling contradiction.

According to it, the purpose of killing Kennedy was to create a pretext for invading Cuba, something that Kennedy had always refused to do. With Oswald groomed as a pro Castro communist, the Dalai shooting was staged as a false flag attack to be blamed on Cuba, according to the CIA theory. But then why did no invasion of Cuba follow Kennedy’s assassination? It is because Johnson, we are told, thwarted the plot’s ultimate aim to start World War II.

This is to ignore the tremendous amount of evidence accumulated against Johnson. In fact, I believe the CIA thesis was originally pushed forward to counter the more natural and more popular thesis of a conspiracy headed by Johnson with uber’s complicity. Another weakness in the CIA theory is the fact that researchers following this lead seem unable to come to any agreement about the mastermind of the plot. In fact, one of the names that come up most often is James Chillus Engleton, the head of counterintelligence within the CIA.

Professor John Newman writes about him in Oswald and the CIA quote no one else in the agency had the access, the authority and the diabolically ingenious mind to manage this sophisticated plot. But as a matter of fact, Engleton was also the Mossad liaison for the CIA as head of the CIA’s Israel office and is widely recognized as having been an Israeli moor. One of his biographers, Tom Mangold, states Angleton’s closest professional friends overseas came from the Mossad and he was held in immense esteem by his Israeli colleagues and by the State of Israel, which was to award him profound honors after his death.

Moreover, it has been revealed by reporter George Trento of the Sunday News Journal that it was Angleton himself who in the 70s, played a key role in keeping the CIA under scrutiny by leaking to the press a secret memo he had written himself about the embarrassing presence of CIA agent Owed Hunt in Dallas on November 22, 1963. By a strange paradox the authors who stand for the conventional thesis of a CIA conspiracy build their case on the biography of Oswald while at the same time claiming that Oswald had almost nothing to do with the killing.

It is about as useful as scrutinizing Osama bin Laden’s biography to solve 911. If Oswald was just a patsy, as he claimed the quest for the real culprits must logically begin by investigating the man who shot Oswald two days after his arrest in the Dallas police station thus preventing a judgment that would have revealed the weakness of the accusation against Oswald. Oswald’s assassin is known as Jack Ruby but few people know that his real name was Jacob Leon Rubenstein that he was the son of Jewish Polish immigrants and that to the Warren Commission he had explained his presence in the police station as a Yiddish translator for Israeli reporters.

Originally from Chicago Ruby was a member of the Jewish underworld known as the Yiddish Connection. His mentor was Los Angeles gangster Mickey Cohen whom he had known and admired since 1946. Cohen was the successor of the famed Benyamin Siegelbaum known as Buxy. One of the bosses of Murder Incorporated the most brutal crime syndicate in the US. Mikke Cohen was in contact with Menayem Begin, the former Ilgun chief.

A specialist of false flag terrorism Cohen was infatuated with the Zionist cause as he explained in his memoir quote now I got so engrossed with Israel that I actually pushed aside a lot of my activities and done nothing but what was involved with this Ilgun war. End quote. We also know that Ruby phoned Al Gruber a Mikke Cohen associate, just after Oswald’s arrest. Most probably, that is when he received an offer that he couldn’t refuse.

For reasons possibly linked to his heavy debt. Ruby died from a rapidly spreading cancer in 1967 so he wouldn’t have been around for a new trial under Robert Kennedy’s presidency. Yet his ergon connections and some of his recorded statements were highly disturbing. Ruby’s defense lawyer, William Kunsler wrote in his memoir that Ruby told him he had killed Oswald. Quote for the Jews. And Ruby’s rabbi, Ile Silverman received the same confession when visiting Ruby in jail.

Later, he became convinced that he was part had been unwittingly moved into a conspiracy to further barrass the Jewish people by killing Oswald. In an interview with reporters after his interrogation Ruby delivers a cryptic message the world will never know the true facts of what occurred. My motives, I’m the only person in the background that knows the truth pertaining to everything relating to my circumstances. The people that had so much to gain and had such a material motive for putting me in a position I’m in will never let the true facts come about.

Before he died, Jack Ruby told friends and family his role in Dallas had been part of a much larger plot. Ruby is only an intermediary link in a conspiracy that begins with the ambush of Dallas, extends to the COVID up of the Warren Commission and involves a pact of silence with the directions of the major media. At every level of the conspiracy, we find the fingerprints of the Israeli deep state.

Let’s begin with the Dallas ambush. JFK’s trip to Dallas had no official character and was sponsored by a powerful business group known as the Dallas Citizens Council. Kennedy was on his way to the reception organized in his honor when he was shot. The Dallas Citizens Council was a powerful group dominated by Jewish businessmen like the wealthy Julius Sheps, described by Brian Edward Stone in The Chosen Folks Jews on the Frontiers of Texas as, quote, a member of every synagogue in the city and de facto leader of the Jewish community, end of quote.

Abram Zakruder, the man who filmed the assassination of John Kennedy and sold his film from $150,000 to Life magazine, was also a member of the Dallas Citizens Council. He was a clothing manufacturer whose headquarter happened to be located in the Dallas Textile Building, or Daltex, where one of the sniper’s nest was located. According to JFK researchers who have studied the firing trajectories interviewed the same day on television.

Zapruda could not hide his satisfaction. The host committee inviting Kennedy was chaired by another influential figure of the wealthy Jewish community in Dallas, advertising executive and PR man Sam Bloom. According to former British intelligence officer Colonel John U. Wilson, it was Bloom who, quote, suggested that the police make Oswald accessible to the press. He also suggested, against the explicit advice of the local FBI, that they move the alleged assassin from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County Jail in order to give the newsman a good story and pictures, end of quote.

It was during this transfer that Oswald was shot by Ruby. Hugh Wilson also writes when the police later searched Ruby’s home, they found a sleep of paper with Bloom’s name, address and telephone number on it. After the Dallas tragedy, Israel’s sayonim, were also busy fabricating the official lie. Apart from the chairman Earl Warren, chosen for his figurative role as chief justice, all key people in the investigative commission were either personal enemies of Kennedy, like Alan Dulles, the CIA director fired by Kennedy in 1961, or ardent zionist like Arden Spector, who, at his death in 2012, was mourned by the Israeli government as, quote, an unswerving defenser of the Jewish state.

End of quote. Alan Spector was the inventor of what came to be called the magic bullet theory a single bullet supposed to have caused seven wounds to John Kennedy and John Connolly sitting before him in the limousine and later found in pristine condition on a gurney in Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas. In conclusion, at every step of the plot we find a Zionist cabal, including businessmen, politicians and gangsters, not forgetting media executives, all devoted to Israel.

The most plausible motive for Israel to kill Kennedy has been revealed by two books in the 1990s the Samsung Option by Seymour Ursch, then Israel and The Bomb by Avner Cohen. And the lead has been followed up in 2007 by Michael Carpin in The Bomb in the Basement. What these investigators reveal is that John Kennedy, informed by the CIA 1960 that Israel was developing its own nuclear weapons in the demona complex in the Negev Desert, was firmly determined to force Israel to renounce it and engaged in a showdown with David Bengurian, who was both Israel’s Prime minister and defense minister.

Bengurian was convinced that by trying to prevent Israel from acquiring the bomb, kennedy was endangering the very survival of the Jewish state to which he had devoted his entire life. Ben Gurion wrote in one of his last letter to JFK mr. President, my people has the right to exist and this existence is in danger. Kennedy, however, remained unyielding. In a letter dated June 15, 1963, he demanded an immediate first visit, followed by regular visits every 6th month.

Otherwise, he wrote, this government’s commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously geopolitized. The result was unexpected. Ben Gurion avoided receiving the letter by announcing his resignation on June 16. As soon as a new prime minister, Levy Eschol, took office, kennedy sent him a similar letter dated June 563, but never got an answer. Did Bengurian resign in order to deal with Kennedy from a deeper level, this is not implausible, because eleven days after resigning, bengurian was more committed than ever to provide Israel with the nuclear weapon.

He said in a speech I do not know of any other nation whose neighbors declare that they wish to terminate it, and not only declare, but prepare for it by all means available to them. Our numbers are small and there is no chance that we could compare ourselves with America’s 180,000,000 or with any Arab neighboring state. There is one thing, however, in which we are not inferior to any other people in the world.

This is the Jewish brain. And the Jewish brain does not disappoint. Jewish science does not disappoint. I am confident that science is able to provide us with the weapons that will serve the peace and deter our enemies, end of quote. Five months later, Kennedy’s death relieved Israel of all pressure to stop its nuclear program and of all risk of publicity on this program. John Macon, the CIA director named by Kennedy to inform him about Israel’s demon project, resigned in 1965, complaining about Johnson’s complete lack of interest.

According to historian Stephen Green, perhaps the most significant development of 1963 for the Israeli nuclear weapons program occurred on November 22 on a plane flying from Dallas to Washington, DC. Indonesian son was sworn in as the 36th President of the United States following the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Lindon Johnson’s White House saw no demona, heard no demona, and spoke no demona when the reactor went critical in early 1964.

End of quote. Kennedy’s determination to make Israel’s demona project abort was only part of the Kennedy problem. Kennedy had committed himself to Arab heads of state to support UN resolution 1994 for the right of return. Of the 800,000 Palestinian refugees expelled in 19 47 48 for the last time, on November 20, 1963, the United States delegation to the United Nations put this issue back on the agenda, causing a strong protest in Israeli circles.

On top of that, since the first month of his presidency, kennedy behaved very warmly toward Nasser, Israel’s worst enemy. Historian Philip Mullenbeck writes while the Eisenhower administration had sought to isolate Nasser and reduce his influence through building up Saudi Arabia’s King Saud as a conservative rival to the Egyptian president, the Kennedy administration pursued the exact opposite strategy. The Israeli leadership wanted nuclear weapons desperately as far back as the 1950s.

They viewed this as indispensable to their survival and expansion. And the great global financial powers behind Israel were, of course, quite friendly to this, because they’re using Israel as, as I said, their organized crime base. In the 1960s, there was a tremendous battle between President John F. Kennedy and the Israeli government, headed by Ben Gurion over this program. Ben Gurion was determined to achieve nuclear weapons. Kennedy was equally determined to stop him.

The result was that Kennedy died, and he was replaced by Lyndon Johnson, a Zionist puppet who was completely controlled by the Zionist lobby on all Middle East issues. And Johnson turned around and essentially handed the Israelis their nuclear weapons. After Kinectic’s death, American foreign policy was reversed again, without the American public being aware of it. Johnson cut the economic aid to Egypt and increased the military aid to Israel, which, according to Stephen Green, reached $92 million in 1966, more than the total of all previous years combined.

For 50 years, the Israeli trail in the Kennedy assassination has been smothered, and anyone who dares mention it is immediately ostracized. American Congressman Paul Findley nevertheless wrote in March 1992 in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs it is interesting to note that in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad, has never been mentioned, end of quote. One single author has seriously investigated that trail michael Collins Piper.

In his 1995 book Final Judgment the Missing Link in the JFK assassination Conspiracy. Piper was largely ignored by the mainstream of the Kennedy truth movement, but his work has made a strong impact. In 2013, in his foreword to a collection of letters by Kennedy, including those addressed to Ben Gurion about demona, martin Sandler writes about Piper’s work of all the conspiracy theories, it remains one of the most intriguing, end of quote.

It is, in fact, a theory widespread in Arab countries. Libyan leader Muhammad Galafi believed it unit Wafar alafica the Riyawala wafadan Israel yoon Wahiran afar who are the fish hatelayo kennedy muna Kennedy on September 23, 2009, Kadafi had the guts to demand a new investigation in front of the General Assembly of the United Nations. Several investigators have identified Lyndon Johnson as the mastermind of the Kennedy assassination. It is beyond doubt that the plotters acted with the foreknowledge that Johnson, who immediately stepped in as head of state after Kennedy’s death, would cover them.

The context of national crisis enabled Johnson to bully both justice and the press while achieving his life’s ambition. Johnson not just benefited from the plot, he participated in its elaboration. As a former senator from Texas, he could mobilize high ranked accomplices in Dallas to prepare the ambush. Johnson also exerted a tight control on the Navy where he had obtained the privilege to name his Texan partners as Navy Secretary.

First John Connelly 1961, then Fred Court one year later. Johnson’s connection to the Navy is an important aspect of the case because it is under the control of Navy officers that Kennedy’s counterfeit autopsy was performed in Washington after his body had been literally robbed at gunpoint from Parkland Hospital in Dallas. The autopsy report from the Navy hospital stated that the fatal bullet had entered the back of Kennedy’s skull in contradiction to the unanimous testimonies of the Dallas hospital staff.

Contrary to a widespread but erroneous belief, lee Arvey Oswald had been recruited not by the CIA, but by the Navy. He was a Marine and as a Marine he had worked for the Office of Naval Intelligence. Oni Johnson had actually taken advantage of his connections in the Navy to participate in the greatest corruption ever recorded at that time. His accomplice Fred Korth was forced to resign as Navy Secretary in November 1963, only weeks before the Dallas coup, after the Justice Department headed by Robert Kennedy had implicated him in a fraud involving a $7 billion contract for the construction of 1700 TFX military aircraft by General Dynamics, a Texas company.

Johnson’s personal secretary, Bobby Baker, was charged in the same case and the scandal was about to blow up on Johnson’s face. Because of this mounting scandal and other suspicions of corruption, kennedy was determined to change Vice President for his upcoming re election campaign. While in Dallas the day before the President’s visit, Richard Nixon’s publicized the rumor of Johnson’s removal, as the Dallas Morning News reported on the morning of November 22.

Instead, Johnson became president that very day. Many Americans immediately suspected Johnson’s involvement in the Dallas coup and all the more after the publication in 1964 of a book by James Evex Halle, a Texan, Luca Clinden, which portrayed Johnson as a man of unlimited ambition and corruption. According to his biographer Robert Carroll, Johnson had, quote a hunger for power so fierce and consuming that no consideration of morality or ethics, no cost.

To himself or to anyone else could stand before it. Robert Kennedy himself suspected Johnson, whom he had always despised and mistrusted. He is reported as saying, Johnson lies all the time. I’m just telling you. He just lies continuously about everything in every conversation I have with him. He lies. As I’ve said, he lies even when he doesn’t have to, end quote. Through the years, a great amount of evidence and testimonies have been gathered against Johnson in the killing of John Kennedy.

The evidence incriminating Johnson does not conflict with the evidence against Israel. Both trails converge in the person of Jack Ruby. The hypothesis that Ruby acted with knowledge of Johnson’s involvement is a likely explanation for some of his OD statements to the Warren Commission. He insisted on being brought to Washington to speak directly to Johnson and added, there will be a certain tragic occurrence happening if you don’t take my testimony and somehow vindicate me so my people don’t suffer because of what I had done, end of quote.

He said that he feared that his act would be used, quote, to create some falsehood about some of the Jewish faith, end of quote. But added that, quote, maybe something can be saved if our president, Lyndon Johnson, knew the truth from me, end of quote. Ruby seemed to have attempted to send a message to Johnson through the Commission, or rather, a warning that he might spill the beans about Israel’s.

Implication if Johnson did not intervene in his favor. We get the impression that Ruby expected Johnson to get him out of prison, just as in 1952, Johnson had managed to avoid prison for his killer, Malcolm Wallace, although found guilty of first degree murder on Johnson’s sister’s lover, who had tried to blackmail Johnson. Yet Johnson did nothing to get Ruby out of jail, and Ruby was sentenced for life.

Ruby’s sense of betrayal explains why, in 1965, after giving a brief press conference, ruby implicitly accused Johnson of Kennedy’s murder. I want to correct what I stated before he was vice president. Yes, I did. When I mentioned about Adelaide Stevens, if he was vice president, there had never been no fascination of that beloved President Kennedy. Well, the answer is the man in office now. Ruby’s full statement to the Warren Commission was leaked to journalist Dorothy Kilkelen and published in the New York journal American in August 1964.

Kilgalen also interviewed Jack Ruby and boasted afterwards of being about to break the real story and publish the biggest scoop in the century. But Kilkellen was found dead by an overdose of barbiturates and alcohol of November 8, 1965. As for Ruby, he was put into solitary confinement and he died in 1967 officially from a rapidly spreading cancer is not the only element connecting Johnson to Israel. Far from it.

In truth, Johnson had always been Israel’s man. His electoral campaigns had been funded since 1948 by Zionist financier Abraham Feinberg, president of the fundraising organization Americans for Haggadah Incorporated and a key financier in The Demona Project. It is the same Abraham Feinberg who, after the Democratic primaries in 1960, made the following proposal to Kennedy as Kennedy himself reported to his friend Charles Bartlett we know your campaign is in trouble.

We are willing to pay your bills if you let us have control of your Middle East policy. It was also two strong supporters of Israel, washington Post publisher Philip Graham and his main columnist, Joseph Alzop, who finally convinced Kennedy to take Johnson as his running mate. Most probably they blackmailed Kennedy with proofs of his adulterous adventures, of which Edgar Hoover, a close friend of Johnson, was well informed, according to Evelyn Lincoln, Kennedy’s personal secretary for twelve years, quote Jack knew that Hoover and LBJ would just fill the air with womanizing, end of quote.

Whatever the real nature of the blackmail, kennedy once apologized to his assistant, Hyman. Raskin, saying, you know, we had never considered Linden, but I was left with no choice. Those bastards were trying to frame me. They threatened me with problems, and I don’t need more problems. And so it is that John was forced to choose Johnson as vice President by the Zionist network, despite the fierce opposition of his brother Robert.

In 2013, Associated Press reported about newly released tapes from Johnson’s White House office showing LBJ’s personal and often emotional connection to Israel. An article from the Five Towns Jewish Times running under the title our first Jewish President, Lyndon Johnson elaborates on that end and after recalling Johnson’s continuous support of Jews and Israel in the then his role in the crafting of the proisrael UN resolution 242 in November 67 concludes President Johnson firmly pointed American policy in a proisrael direction.

In a historical context, the American emergency airlift to Israel in 1973, the constant diplomatic support, the economic and military assistance, and the strategic bonds between the two countries can all be credited to the seeds planted by LBJ, end of quote. The article also mentions that research into Johnson’s personal history indicates that he inherited his concern for the Jewish people from his family. His Aunt. Jesse Johnson Hatcher a Major Influence On LBJ.

Was A Member Of The Zionist Organization Of America. In an additional note, the article said the facts indicate that both of Lyndon Johnson’s great grandparents on the maternal side were Jewish. The line of Jewish mothers can be traced back three generations. In Lyndon Johnson’s family tree, there is little doubt that he was Jewish, end of quote. The Jewish and the Israeli press occasionally refer to Johnson’s secret Jewishness and often remember with gratitude his Israel friendly policy.

Whatever was the reason of Johnson’s loyalty to Israel, it is a fact that thanks to Johnson, israel could acquire its first atomic bomb somewhere between 1965 and 67 and carry out its plan to annex Palestinian territories beyond the boundaries of the United Nations partition plan by leaning on the Pentagon and CIA Oaks, who had previously been brittled by Kennedy. Johnson intensified the Cold War and created the climate of tension which Israel needed in order to demonize Egyptian President Nasser and reinforce Israel’s own stature as an indispensable US ally in the Middle East.

During the Six Day War of 1967, Israel managed to triple its territory while creating the illusion of acting in legitimate defense to the oppose of the American press. The lie could not deceive American intelligence agencies, but Johnson had given the green light to Israel’s attack and even authorized James Angleton of the CIA to give Israel the precise positions of the Egyptian air bases which enabled Israel to destroy them in just a few hours.

Four days after the start of the Israeli attack, nasser accepted the ceasefire request from the UN Security Council. It was too early for Israel, who had not yet achieved all our objectives in terms of conquest. That is when, on June 8, Israel attacked the USS Liberty, an unarmed NSA spy ship stationed in international waters of Sinai. In June 1967, Johnson covered up the brutal Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, an attack that resulted in the murder of 34 American sailors as well as 171 casualties.

While the attack was taking place, Johnson personally recalled air defenses for the Liberty with the following explanation quote we are not going to embarrass an ally, end of quote. The Liberty incident was a classic false flag to be blamed on Egypt. Israel’s intention was to suck American sons and daughters into an extremely dangerous war for Israel, this time against Egypt, a Soviet ally. This false flag nearly resulted in World War II by virtue of the fact that nuclear armed phantom jets were launched towards Cairo and were only recalled when it became clear that the Liberty was not going to sink and witnesses would live to tell the tale.

That’s what the world really doesn’t know today, and I think that’s why we were sworn to secrecy, is how close we really came to a potential nuclear holocaust. You know how much press the nuclear warheads got when they landed in Cuba? The standard word world thermonuclear war. Well, this was a thousand times worse. But nobody knows about it. The story of the Liberty is not a who done it, it’s the why did it.

The casualties were high 34 American dead and 75 wounded. There were arguments later about how the error happened. The reality of what happened is it was not a mistake and they wanted to sink us. And what does that mean to this country? Case closed. Mistaken identity. We’re very sorry. Is there anything else I can help you with? Well, there’s no question it was a big cover up from the top on down.

You just couldn’t talk about it. It was such a secret with our lives threatened and who knows if they were monitoring us or doing whatever. You ever repeat one word about the USS Liberty and who did it to you. I guarantee I’ll see you in Leavenworth. Or worse. You know what worse means? When you’re told by the President of the United States Secretary of Defense to keep your mouth shut.

Don’t say anything. That’s the direct order. Israel had America by the scuff of the neck. Such was the need to cover up what America got up to during the Six Day War. His girlfriend from the Mossad told him that he could raise all kinds of money to continue the Vietnam War. The Liberty is a microcosm of this much bigger problem in the Middle East, and Americans need to know what happened.

This story has to be told. Most Americans remember their war dead on Memorial Day, but there’s a small group of veterans fighting for special recognition. Every June eigth, that’s the day in 1967 that the US. Has liberty was attacked, surprisingly, by the State of Israel. During Israel’s Six Day War with Egypt, 34 crew members died. The survivors say new information coming to light proves it wasn’t all a big mistake.

June 8, 1967. The day Israel fired rockets, burning napalm and torpedoes at an ally ship, the USS Liberty. It was day four of Israel’s own six day war with Egypt. Officially, America was not involved in a war. We had not taken sides and we were in a neutral position, we thought. And it didn’t end up being that way. Rick it was a total surprise of what they did and how they did it and how relenting they were trying to destroy and murder American citizens on the high seas.

Let’s talk about it. What happened? Well, the jet aircraft suddenly around 02:00, unmarked jet aircraft, unmarked. We had no idea who was attacking it. We thought it was the Arabs. I mean, our best buddies in the whole world wouldn’t do it. The Israelis, we thought it was the Arabs. And we figured Tech, in 15 minutes, ten minutes we’re going to have help there, take care of us. What interesting, what was the nature of the attack at that moment? Well, it was rockets, cannons, machine guns.

This is a hole right here. Israeli jets and motor torpedo boats launch an unprovoked attack on the ship. They drop napalm and strape its decks with rockets, cannon fire and armored piercing rounds before trying to sink it with torpedoes. I saw the Israeli flag and I thought, oh God, thank God, our friends are here to save us. Little did I know they come to murder the rest of us and massacre us and destroy us.

You had no idea that it was Israel attacking the ship? None. So you saw the boats approaching, the Israeli flag is flying and you’re thinking, our allies are coming to save us. But instead they torpedoed the boat. They torpedoed it and then they went around our ship and circled it and circled it and shooting with their machine guns, 50 calibers. There’s over 5000 armor piercing bullets in that ship.

5000. Now counting the 850 holes. Just like this. Napalm burning us up. They shoot a torpedo at us, five of them. And one of them hits the starboard side. How many of these were there that you count? 850 of them. They told us to quit counting at 800. And 5850 of those were in the ship. Over 5000 armored piercing bullets. Napalm was dropped on our ship. Napalm. Napalm.

Five torpedoes were fired at our ship. Five out of three torpedo boats, four missed and one hit on the starboard side. Just about two frames or one frame from the engine room. If it hits the engine room, we’re all gone. We wouldn’t be here. Another victim was the United States naval vessel Liberty. She was mistaken for an Egyptian vessel and Israeli ships and planes torpedoed and strayed her.

The official story is the incident was a case of mistaken identity. That the Israelis didn’t know that it was an American ship. But it was a mistake. It was a mistake. You didn’t know it was an American ship. We didn’t know it was an American ship. People thought at the beginning that this was an Egyptian ship, an Arab ship. But Liberty’s crew has long maintained israeli air forces were flying low enough to clearly see the American flag.

Well, I, for one, know that our flag was flying. And I know for a fact they know who we were. Throughout the attack. The ship flies the Stars and Stripes, the flag of Israel’s closest ally, the United States of America. Its name, the USS liberty, is freshly painted on its stern and the bow carries the distinctive numbers of an American naval vessel. They know exactly who we were.

We were identified already. They said that we got it on tape that they knew we were an American ship. This audio tape, which has never been broadcast before, was recorded in real time by the Israeli military during the assault. The woman’s voice in the background is counting down the seconds. It proves that Israeli commanders knew all along that they were attacking an American ship. Hasan type. Thereby, for the first time.

This and other evidence allows us to reveal the true story of what happened that day and what came after when a deadly assault by one ally on another was covered up and an American president was manipulated by the secret agents of a foreign power. Events that have shaped us. Israeli relations ever since. The communications were taken out on almost the first pass. They took out every antenna off that ship.

There was a bunch of them. I don’t even know how many, but there was a lot of them. We had 450 caliber machine guns on that ship. And that was for repel borders anyway. Like we were importers. Somebody tried to border a ship. We’d have that for defense. That’s all we had. But they were gone. So how did they know to hit every antenna, every gun tub. They knew everything.

And where they got all the information from, God only knows, but they knew everything. They jammed it. Crew members say Israel even fired at lifeboats after one of its five torpedoes had already smashed a 40 foot hole in the ship’s side, a section where 25 intercept operators were working and killed. And they shot up the life rafts that were put into the water, and they shot the ones that were still on board the ship.

Bullet holes, shell holes everywhere. Blood the folks sold. The front part of this ship was just red with blood. I can’t tell you how severe and how bad it was to witness and to see and to hear and to feel. The carnage that these Zionist murders put on America and our own government covered it up for them, the US court of Inquiry reported in just 20 days. It was a rush job, full of spelling mistakes, much key evidence ignored, no Israelis interviewed, and it exonerated them from blame.

I read the court of inquiry and realized that my statements had been stricken from the record and never recorded. So I knew then for certain that the COVID up was massive. The Israelis then rushed out their own report, which concluded that the whole affair was a series of mistakes and that no one was to blame. The only dissenting voice was that of the Israeli ambassador in Washington. He sent a secret telegram back home arguing that Israel was clearly guilty.

He cited the audiotape of the attack, the existence of which was known to top Israeli officials, and mentioned the crucial 20 minutes gap that followed the Liberty’s identification and the launch of the torpedoes against her. He said they should own up to what they had done and put the guilty on trial. His advice was ignored. The focus now was to repair the damage to American Israeli relations. Since the attack on the Liberty, the USA and Israel have grown ever closer.

At the time, George Ball, the US undersecretary of State, noted that it seemed clear to the Israelis that as American leaders did not have the courage to punish them for the blatant murder of American citizens, they would let them get away with anything. The ship was bombed, strapped and torpedoed during 75 minutes by Israeli mirrored jets and three torpedo boats, while Johnson from the White House intervened to prohibit the nearby Six fleet from rescuing it.

Even the live boats were machine gunned. The attack would have been blamed on Egypt if it had succeeded that is, if the ship had sunk and its crew had been exterminated. The operation would then have given Johnson a pretext for intervening on the side of Israel against Egypt. But it failed. The US’s liberty affair was suppressed by a commission of inquiry headed by Admiral John Sidlem McCain, two father of John McCain three who recently supported ISIS terrorists against Syria.

Everyone in the national security team recommended arming ISIS. Johnson accepted Israel’s furious targeting error explanation. What’s more, Johnson rewarded Israel by lifting the embargo on offensive military equipment. US made tanks and aircraft immediately flowed to Tel Aviv. This failed false flag attack is evidence of Johnson’s secret complicity with Israel, implying high treason against his own country. It is hard to overestimate just how profound America changed when the patriot John F.

Kennedy was replaced by one of the supreme American traders in Lyndon Baines Johnson. Not only did Johnson bolster Israel’s nuclear weapons program, he did not compel the American Zionist Council to register as a foreign agent. The end result of this is an American political system that is so corrupt that it would make a bana republic blush. Many of Johnson’s closest friends and advisors were pro Israeli, and they reported back to Tel Aviv on his every move.

The Israeli story constantly shifted to counter whatever new intelligence the White House received. So sensitive were these communications that the Israelis used code names to protect the identity of their White House agents. But for the first time, the members of the ring can be named. Hamlet was a million dollar fundraiser for the Democrats. When he rang, Johnson took his calls. He was Abe Feinberg. Menace was Arthur Goldberg, the US.

Ambassador to the United Nations. Harare was David Ginsburg, a high profile Washington lawyer who also represented the Israeli embassy. Elan was Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas. Lyndon Johnson had dinner with him on the eve of the Six Day War. The strategy worked. The US. Israeli relationship proved to be stronger than the killing and injuring of more than 200 Americans. Besides the fact that John and Robert were brothers, their assassinations have at least two things in common johnson and Israel.

First, their deaths are precisely framed by Johnson’s presidency, which was also marked by other political assassinations, such as Martin Luther King’s. Johnson was in control of the two investigations on John and Robert’s murders. Secondly, in both cases, the central element that contradicts the official story strongly suggests the implication of the Israeli deep state. In the case of Robert, it is the choice of the manipulated patsy, which was obviously meant to disguise Robert’s assassination as an act of hatred against Israel.

In the case of John, it is the identity of the man tasked with killing the patsy, a Jewish gangster linked to the Ergun. These two common elements in the Kennedy assassinations, johnson and Israel, are themselves closely linked because Johnson was a man acting for Israel, just like Ruby, although at a higher level. The evidence for Johnson’s secret loyalty to Israel includes his high treason in the USS Liberty affair.

The causal link between the two assassinations then becomes clear. Even if Robert had been pro Israel, which he was not, israel and John’s son would have had a compelling reason to eliminate him before he got to the White House and reopened the investigation on his brother’s death. In order to solve the mystery of John Kennedy’s assassination, we simply have to look into the two other assassinations that are connected to it.

On the one hand, the assassination of Oswald, the man whose trial could have exposed the real plotters, and on the other hand, the assassination of Robert Kennedy, the man who would have reopened the case if he had reached the White House. And both of these assassinations bear the signature of the Israeli deep state. The Kennedy assassinations are obsessing the American psyche and corrupting its character. The sense of a terrible truth hidden by the government is making America deeply neurotic, like a repressed family secret affecting the whole personality.

This lie, buried into the deep state has rendered Americans vulnerable to other lies, just like any lie creates a predisposition for new lies and even the need for more lies to cover it up. Having fallen deeper and deeper under the control of Israel, america is now morally corrupt and haunted by its own lies. Conversely, exposing one lie will make other lies fall one by one. That explains why there is still today, more than 50 years later, a determination from the corrupt American Zionist control leadership to keep the truth hidden.

This is also why unveiling the truth about the Kennedy assassinations is so crucial and will lead inevitably to unveiling the truth about 911 and to a new awareness about the other lies by which the United States and the world have been drawn into wars against the enemies of Israel. Carl Jung, the psychologist of the collective unconscious, said that the mythical character of a life expresses that it has a historical significance.

The life and death of the Kennedys have such a mythical dimension. The Kennedy dynasty embodied the Irish Catholic root and branches of the American people with all that it represents in terms of antagonism to English puritanism, the most judaized branch of Christianity. This antagonism goes back to the martyr of Ireland and the British oppression during the Second World War. The Republic of Ireland remained neutral, refusing to ally itself to the British.

Joseph Kennedy was then a leading figure of the isolationist. Like Charles Lindbergh, he believed that wealthy Jews were pushing the Roosevelt administration into total war against Germany. After the war, an increase in Jewish cultural influence and a decline of the Irish Catholic voice could be observed. In that context, the presidency of John Kennedy was in the collective psyche and the destiny of the United States of great spiritual significance.

This metahistorical significance of the Kennedys did not escape the Zionist Jews inhabited by the supremacist geopolitical project of their ancient scriptures and placing all their hopes in their ability to influence US foreign policy in favor of Israel. There is in the Kennedy tragedy a providential meaning. This is why the light on this affair will mark the beginning of the end of the mental control exercised by the Zionist movement on America and the west in general.

One day, hopefully, the Kennedy brothers will receive in the United States the national recognition they deserve as heroes and martyrs in the fight against Israel’s global crime. I am absolutely convinced that John F. Kennedy is the last President of the United States to have honor, integrity, and courage. Not only was JFK fighting to halt the Israeli nuclear weapons program, he was insisting that Israel’s nuclear power plant be inspected, something that has not been done to this day.

He was also demanding that the American Zionist Council, since renamed APAC, be registered as a foreign agent. We see today the magnitude of his failure to achieve this goal by virtue of the fact that APAC virtually owns America’s long since prostituted politicians. When Americans finally learn their true history, they will understand the sublime beauty of John F. Kennedy’s actions in his final months of life. Not only were his actions a thing of beauty, his words will likewise be seen among the greatest acts of patriotism in the history of the United States.

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means, for expanding its sphere of influence, on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. His attack I want to look at any sensitive areas around where Jews are involved. See, the Jews are all through the government, and we have got to get in those areas.

We’ve got to get commanding charge who is not Jewish to control the Jewish people of Jews? I sure do. Second, most Jews are just mean. You have a garment and a kissing. But, Bob, generally speaking, you can’t trust the Vatican. They turn up. Are you correct? Am I wrong? And their whole orientation is against this administration anyway. They have this American attitude, too, and they’re smart. They have the ability to do what they want to do, which is to hurt us, which is probably some people that are interesting enough, he got this one, his AIDS.

None of his aides have ever been to the young guys that he’s always had. I read the Jews chairman throughout the administration. He’s got a Jewish set, and they’re all see what we can do about them. It’s okay. So I told you all that. I told you all that it was going to be interesting tonight. I have. I found that version again. I looked at, like, multiple versions of that documentary, and they all were an hour and 26 minutes.

But this one happened to be an hour and 36 minutes. So I saw the parts about the liberty, and I saw, okay, they actually expanded the things on the liberty, and that was awesome. I did not see that last part about Nixon in the White House. I was stunned at that. Now, literally, this is going to be funny because I was literally looking for the JFK Secret Society speech to play, and I was trying to do it because I’m doing it on the computer, and I was trying to do it to make sure that the sound didn’t, like, on YouTube and looking for it.

And I found it, and literally, it came up, and as it came up, I heard it, and I’m like, I’m trying to stop it. What’s going on? And it wasn’t me. It was the actual video. That was the JFK Secret Society speech that was going on in the video. You guys don’t know this because you only see me, but I literally have 427 inch screens. I’ve got one here, I’ve got one here.

I’ve got one here, and I’ve got one here. I have four screens that I look at when I’m doing this, though. So I’m literally, like, looking all over the place. So if you guys are wondering why I’m looking all over now, you know. But I found that speech, and I found the long version of the speech, and literally, I was trying to stop it, but it was playing on there.

So I was like the timing was like I was like, wow, I guess that was pretty good timing on my part. But I man hold on a second here, because this is just this is just too rich. Ask not what you mean freely. Just this is just too rich not to replay. This is just too rich not to replay. I have to do know nixon what was Kennedy the occasion of his I don’t know.

And then kissinger banai breath. Nixon the speech he gave the kissinger the it wasn’t in. It wasn’t an all out attack. It was a fairly I don’t know. But in fact, here is the JFK speech, the long version. I’m going to see if there is the transcript, show transcript, and I want to see if the four we okay. All right, I’m going to play this I’m going to play this right now world by I’m going to play this right now because this is a big deal by every businessman or labor leader and by every newspaper.

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a wartime discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match. Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary. Restraints. So that’s enough. You get the point. I still want to go back, and I want to play this.

I want to play this again, because this right here was jaw dropping for me. And the reason this is jaw dropping, because I have for a long time believed that Nixon was in on the JFK assassination. Okay? I’ve long time believed that. But I heard not too long ago that Nixon actually was one of Trump’s mentors, and that potentially, Nixon was part of the plan going back a long time.

So with that said, I want to play this again, and I want you guys to pay very close attention to the screen. If you’re not watching and you’re only listening, stop what you’re doing and watch the watch the subtitles, because there’s subtitles here. This blew my mind. I’ve never seen this before, ever. Not one time. Holy crap. I want to look at any sensitive areas around where Jews are involved.

See, the Jews are all through the government, and we have got to get in those areas. We’ve got to get a man in charge who is not Jewish to control the Jewish judge. Most Jews are disloyal. You have a garment and a kissinger and frankly, sad barb, generally speaking, you can have trust the basket they turn up. Are you correct? Am I wrong? And their whole orientation is against this administration anyway, and they’re smart.

They have the ability to do what they want to do, which is to hurt us, which is a problem. They have the ability some people would have he got this one, his aides. None of his aides have ever been to the young guys that he’s always had. I read. So anyway, that blew my mind. Blew my mind. Now, if that is true, if that’s the way that Nixon felt, then that completely changes my opinion of Nixon.

180 degrees. 180 degrees. Excuse me, but unfucking believable. I do not believe my ears right now. I am in a state of shock. Literally, I didn’t see this. I watched that documentary the hour and 26 minutes one I watched it four times between yesterday and today. Actually, somebody sent it to me on Wednesday night. I watched it Wednesday night. I watched it three more times yesterday. I watched it three more okay, explain what? Explain what am I looking at? What are you asking me to explain? Nixon did ask the CIA to bring him information about JFK’s assassination.

I believe that that’s why they did him dirty on Watergate. I’m not sure that Nixon is a patriot. Yeah, well, I think that okay. Yeah, maybe for Bella. Maybe that is maybe. Oh, explain what I was feeling about Nixon that I like. Okay. I had heard that there were four presidents that were involved with the COVID up of the JFK assassination or that were involved in the JFK assassination in some form or fashion, and as a result of their involvement, they were rewarded with the presidency, and those four people were LBJ.

Nixon, Gerald Ford and George H. W. Bush. Okay? So that’s what I had heard, and that’s what I had believed for quite some time. So somebody a while back told me that Nixon actually was kind of like a mentor to Trump and that Trump followed or it’s possibly going back. The Patriots, if you want to say the plan, when to strike and all this other stuff, it is quite possible that that plan has been there has been a plan that has been going on for a long time, not just something that just popped up eight years ago.

Anyway, that’s kind of what I was saying. I don’t know if it was a Reagan sting. I don’t know about that. But at the end of the day, I watched this with you guys, and I’m thinking, okay, cool. I was really excited, because it really went into a much deeper this was a butchered copy of the original documentary. This was not the original documentary. The original documentary left out about ten minutes.

This had about ten extra minutes in it that somebody actually inserted the information about the Liberty they inserted all of the Liberty clips. I hadn’t seen some of those. And they inserted the stuff about Nixon. And that really I have to tell you, right now, I’m excited seeing this is exciting to me. This is very exciting to me. I’m, like, over the moon with joy right now, because if that’s the case and some of the stuff that I’ve heard about Trump and some of the stuff, it’s like, okay, you know what? Maybe there is anyway, I don’t know.

I still don’t know what to think. Time will tell. Time will be the judge. Time will be the judge. Anyway, this is a fun evening. I’m a little giddy right now. My jaw dropped. Pick it up and put it back into place. It’s a little sore. Hit the desk pretty hard. Anyway, all right, guys, well, I hope you enjoyed this edition of the Friday Night Watch party, because this was good.

This was good. All right, guys, that’s it. I’m done. I’m speechless. I am out of words. So I just want to say thank you, everybody, for thank you, everybody, for showing up. And I think at one point, we had almost 300 people watching, so it’s quite good on a black Friday night. And welcome all the new people. It’s nice to see here. And we do this every Friday night.

Sometimes the movies and the documentaries are good. Sometimes they’re kind of dull. Last week was I think last week was a little bit I think it was underwhelming. This week was quite the opposite, if I may say so myself, at least for me. Anyway, guys, I do not know if I’m going to be here tomorrow. I didn’t do anything for Thanksgiving, but I did have a friend who has invited me over to their place to do something to do with a split family type thing.

And so they all had Thanksgiving dinner with their mom on Thanksgiving Day. And tomorrow they’re going to do it with their dad. And their dad is one of my good friends. So I’m probably going to go out and have dinner tomorrow. So tomorrow will be my kind of, quote unquote, Thanksgiving Day, so to speak. So I probably won’t be here tomorrow, but I’m very eager to get back into finish the book.

So I might do one tomorrow morning or I might do one tomorrow midday, so maybe we’ll see. Just this depends on how I’m feeling. So how my eye is doing, because my is bugging me tonight right now. But anyway, well, you all have a wonderful evening, and if you’re traveling, heading home or whatever, be safe on the road and I’ll see you when I see you. So if I don’t see you tomorrow, then I’ll probably be back Sunday.

So have a really great night, everybody. Thanks again for the support, appreciate it. Bye. .