Why haven’t we seen more lawsuits and improvements to our election system?
Well, Jovan Hutton Pulitzer posted this on Telegram.
There are literally 0 lawyers in Arizona that will take the case!
He shared this PDF that shares many of the issues with the 2020 election in Arizona.
You can also see his presentation here, which covers many additional points.
The PDF states (emphasis is my own):
“This is an overview of additional supporting evidence reporting in excess of 140k ballots could have possibly been manufactured (digitally inserted and printed after the fact) in the 2020 General Election in Maricopa County Arizona. This document is to present additional supporting evidence these anomalous ballots were “inserted” into the election to “manufacture a pre-determined outcome” for the election. In short, the ballots in question have no way of being proven to have actually been cast and authentically tallied during the time of the election”
The PDF then goes on to say, “these ballots differ completely in rhythm when compared to all other ballots tallied for the 2020 election.”
HOW ARE THE 140K DIFFERENT?
For these 140k ballots we have a supposed PHYSICAL ARTIFACT of the paper ballot, but we do NOT have a PRE-IMAGE, however, DO HAVE A POST IMAGE and a TEXT FILE but the TEXT FILE is devoid of any date and time stamp confirmation.
What should be noted is to create a POST IMAGE of a ballot, requires a PHYSICAL BALLOT TO BE SCANNED AND A PRE-IMAGE TO BE CREATED.
Thus, the question is: Why is it we have a POST IMAGE and a physical ballot but NO PRE-IMAGE of the ballot?
You can read more details in the PDF here.
So are you pointing out that we can find and show legitimate proof of corruption and – basically- we are powerless to do anything about it – that we have zero voice – that there are no other options to get the truth out – that our legal system can and will keep us slaves and there isn’t a DAMM thing any of us “sheeple” can do about !?
(1) With only paper ballots marked with a No. 2 graphite pencil, winners of elections were announced within two hours of the closing of voting polls across the United States. ONLY PEOPLE WHO PRODUCE A CURRENT AND VALID PICTURE I.D. WITH THEIR CURRENT AND VALID ADDRESS AT THE VOTING POLL ON ELECTION DAY HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE.
(2) Electronic voting machines permit fraudulent counting, recording of votes, and tallying votes that could not possibly occur with paper ballots MARKED ON ELECTION DAY AT THE VOTING POLL.
(3) The wolf in sheep’s clothing that was used to entice voters into using electric voting machines was “ease and accuracy and speed of counting votes”. Yet, electronic voting machines seem to take days — even weeks — to tally votes.
(4) If a person cannot get to a voting poll on election day, then that person is not qualified to vote. There ought be NO early voting, NO absentee voting, NO VOTING ALLOWED EXCEPT IN PERSON ON ELECTION DAY AT A POLLING SITE. The convenience of voters is no reason to give up the integrity of the counting of votes. This simple expedient eliminates dead people voting, voting by former residents of the precinct, and “stuffing ballots”.