Global Great Awakenings with Scott Bennett and Susan Lindauer
Summary
➡ The text details allegations of misconduct and corruption within the US government, suggesting that politicians such as Rand Paul and Joe Biden have ignored serious instances of financial malfeasance and potentially manipulated national policy for personal gain. It suggests consistent targeting and indictment of President Trump to distract from political scandals involving Joe Biden and that this is not a coincidence, but rather, comes across as political tactics. The speaker strongly criticizes the handling of the 2020 election procedures and court’s refusal to hear cases related to alleged election fraud.
➡ The text discusses two major allegations of election fraud involving ballots purportedly printed in Guangdong, China and being specific to the Georgia election, and a claim that the South Philadelphia mob had been paid to fill out ballots for Biden. These charges, allegedly backed by multiple pieces of evidence and potential key witnesses, are presented as a defense against claims that former President Trump knowingly deceived his supporters. The sender claims that the proof was given to Trump’s legal team, thereby asserting his innocence in these cases. The text also suggests a strategy for Trump’s attorneys, including filing motions for dismissal and summary judgment, and escalating the case to the Supreme Court if necessary, while also suggesting civil suits against those they see as prosecutorial misconduct. The potential hurdles they could face from potentially partisan judges obstructing the introduction of exculpatory evidence are also considered.
➡ The narrative discusses interactions with various legal and political figures observed in discussions involving election fraud, terrorist financing, and suspicious dealings involving Covington and Burling, Union Bank of Switzerland, and the Chinese Communist Party. Evidence of election fraud, money laundering, racketeering, and misinformation is claimed to have been presented to President Trump and others, suggesting a fraudulent scheme allegedly coordinated by the Democrats supported by foreign entities.
➡ The text discusses alleged hacking and cyberattacks from China during the U.S. elections, targeting specific voting precincts in Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Georgia. It also illustrates disputes within the U.S. courts in handling alleged election fraud cases. The text suggests further investigations by special personnel into potentially manipulated voting machines and servers in key counties and states. It criticizes Mike Pence for his role in upholding the election results, claiming that he committed treason. It also underscores discrepancies in voter turnout in select states and blames Chinese printing presses for producing fraudulent ballots.
➡ The speaker alleges election fraud, arguing that the 2020 election was overthrown, and calls for evidence to be presented to authorities to correct perceived injustices. They believe the unfolding events will swing public sentiment towards President Trump and are urging for the impeachment of Joe Biden. They criticize specific figures, groups, and initiatives, while also expressing concern about misinformation and censorship, particularly in social media, and conclude by promoting the use of their website and products.
➡ The text involves a speaker expressing their views on various groups, predicting turmoil, and signing off from a discussion with Susan Lindauer, indicating they will reconvene on Monday, with repeated blessings for a good night.
Transcript
Good luck down there as far as so we are going to be exploring what is all happening right now with President Trump. And indeed, this truth shall set him free, because there are a lot of people who have dealt with the deep state. There are a lot of people that have been falsely imprisoned because of the deep state. There are a lot of whistleblowers that have worked in the State Department and the CIA and the US.
Military and various agencies that have been persecuted, imprisoned, some even killed for their loyalty to the Constitution, for their protection and defense and their fulfillment of their oath against these domestic traitors, these domestic enemies that we sworn oath to defend against joe Biden, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Lanny Brewer, Loretta Lynch, to name a few pond scum parasites. So we’re going to be seeing a lot of parallel whistleblowers and revelations, amicus briefs and other things that are going to be coming alongside and being fired at.
The deep state presented to Congress again, numerous times in the past, they’ve already been presented, but this is a time of existential threat to our country. Douglas McGregor, colonel Douglas McGregor had said something wise that I’d heard before and it was refreshing to hear. As George Orwell said, sometimes the duty of a responsible man is to restate the obvious. Doug McGregor said, patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
And indeed, Susan, that fits exactly what we’ve been saying before. Patriotism is going to be the grenade, the smoke canister that they pull to try and escape their accountability in. They’re going to trigger a conflict with Russia, maybe a conflict with China, maybe a conflict with Iran, Russia and China all at the same time. Just try and say, oh, we’re Americans, we’ve got to stand together or else we’re going to be defeated by our interviewed interfered with the election before and now we have to stand against them.
I can feel it in my bones, I can sense it in my spirit that they’re going to pull that. But before we jump into our conversation, let me play a couple videos and then we’ll jump into Susan’s very powerful presentation on what is going to be coming up very soon. Let me bring it up right now. Here we go. And let’s see. Make sure our sound is shared.
This is always tricky. All right, here we go. Let me bring it up again. You can tell I’m not a techie. All right. This is a speech I gave about what I perceived was going to be coming and some of the political shenanigans that people are playing. So I want to have this as part of our conversation. Well, I have a lot of stuff I agree with Rand Paul about, but on this particular issue, I disagree with him completely when he’s advocating for a non impeachment of Joe Biden.
I believe that’s a betrayal to the oath that you take as a member of government and as Congress and as a military member. You swear an oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and any acts of abuse and corruption, fraud, waste, treason, things like that. You have a duty to stand up and expose and stop, not expose and stop when it’s convenient, not do I want to? Is it more advantageous to engage in political theater and drama, blah, blah, blah? What are they going to do? What would we do then? What would we do in response? And what would they do in response? Suddenly, it takes on a circus manifestation.
And with regards to Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, if I was laying out the impeachment case, which I think absolutely has to happen, it would be very all encompassing, and it would essentially say, ladies and gentlemen of the United States of America, and this is open to every American. Joe Biden has committed treason. He’s committed corruption. He’s committed extortion. He’s committed bribery from the following cases. He’s been in cahoots in contact with the Chinese communist party, with his son to filter and launder money to him directly as the big guy from Chinese parties when he was vice president.
I personally know that Joe Biden and Barack Obama were part of a shell game to finance terrorism through 19,000 Swiss bank accounts that Eric Holder, taking orders from Barack Obama and Joe Biden, threw whistleblowers who were Swiss bankers into jail to cover this up. And through a military officer myself, when I was filing the shell game report, exposing this as was my duty, I didn’t report it because I wanted drama.
I reported it and filed because of my duty and oath as an officer. And I hold Rand Paul and every member of Congress to that echelon, too. Now, Joe Biden and Hunter Biden you could even say have been involved with sex crimes, with underage girls, and I’m sure we’ll see civil suits against them for that. But this has to happen. The impeachment has to happen, or laws mean nothing and the Constitution means nothing.
We’re in a big puppet show of political gamesmanship if we don’t expose every element of these crimes. That’s what the American people want to know. What’s been happening? Who did it? When? What did they do? Where are the records? Where are the receipts? We want it all thrown in front, not a bunch of testimony from Ukrainian embassy deep state puppets like Ambassador Taylor and Bindeman and all the rest of them know talking about Trump.
But we want to know the real crimes that have endangered the national security of the United States. Because look at what he’s doing. Joe Biden or the people behind him have sent America to this war with Russia. You got Rhinos doing it too. But all of the crimes of Biden we have a constitutional duty to stop and expose. And Rand Paul seems to have forgotten that in the rhetoric of flatulent conversation that his father conveniently bumbles around with as well.
Now I’m going to read you a letter I got from Rand Paul when I was an army officer, a military whistleblowing report. And I filed to Rand Paul’s office, to the Judiciary Committee, the shell game report as a military officer exposing Joe Biden, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation’s shell game of Swiss banks being used and a specific cover up of $104,000,000 payoff by the CIA to Swiss bank whistleblower Brad Birkenfeld on September 11, 2012.
And this is the report that I got. I don’t know if you can see it. This is from the shell game book. Okay, there you go. There’s rand paul’s signature. And this is the letter that he wrote me on April 8, 2013, after I wrote to him as a military officer illegally imprisoned for reporting the shell game of terrorist financing that occurred in Libya and elsewhere. Mr. Scott Bennett.
Dear Mr. Bennett, thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding the recent attacks on the US embassy in Egypt and the US. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Like you, I am appalled at these attacks. Following the overthrow of Marmar Gaddafi and Hasnimbubarik as the respective leaders of Libya and Egypt, the United States looked forward to an era of peace and cooperation with each nation. On the evening of September 11, 2012, attacks occurred at both the US embassy in Egypt and the US.
Consulate in Libya. The attack in Libya left Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other members dead. Other attacks and protests occurred in other countries in the region in the following days. These despicable acts were unprovoked by the United States government and an attack on our embassies and consulates is considered an attack on American soil. I believe there was negligence by the Obama administration to protect our diplomatic staff in Libya.
While testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, of which I am a member, secretary of State Hillary Clinton admitted to not reading State Department cables from the consulate in Benghazi asking for increased security. Neglecting these messages is a failure of leadership of not only Secretary Clinton, but also reflects on the failures of the Obama administration. As I continue to serve as a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I will continue to exercise my oversight abilities on issues surrounding the United States foreign policy.
Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is an honor and a privilege to represent the Commonwealth of Kentucky in the United States. Please continue to inform me of any thoughts you have on federal legislative issues. Sincerely. Rand paul. Well, you know what, Rand? I wasn’t writing you as a constituent. I was writing you as a military officer who did this for a living, who had a top secret Sci clearance and was reporting you terrorist financing documents, terrorist financing bank accounts, and you did nothing.
So rand Paul and his weak, effeminate cowardice did absolutely nothing when I brought to him the fact that on September 11, 2012, CIA made $104,000,000 payoff to a Swiss banker that had 19,000 bank accounts. That Hillary Clinton. Barack obama. Joe Biden took 4000 and investigated and 15,000 went mysteriously missing. Probably to fund a whole bunch of operations that we see in Libya and Syria and Ukraine. That’s what I gave him.
That’s what he failed to do. And I don’t like seeing him with this game of let’s just take the easy way. You serve government, you take the hard way or you get the hell out. Jim well, Scott, listening to that, I mean, that’s pretty much boilerplate that went out to a whole lot of constituents. I was disturbed by him implying that the death of Gaddafi was a good thing.
I mean, he ought to have been outraged by course, of course. Brian, your thoughts? So there we go. I’ll stop there. And, Susan, before we jump into that other video, I want to get your feedback on I. There’s a lot coming out, but that was a particular thing because Rand Paul and others are trying to stop the impeachment of Biden. I think that’s a tragic mistake. I think constitutionally we are bound to stop some.
We are obligated to impeach Biden. Biden is guilty of receiving money from China. Biden is throwing US foreign policy and US security and our allies with regards to trade, military, all facets of technology, and we are throwing the US economy under the bus. And it is a disaster for our economy. We have a serious crisis that is escalating now. And what we’ve seen today was President Trump was indicted again for the third time.
And his attorney made a brilliant point that every time Hunter Biden or Joe Biden get in trouble, the very next day, something happens to President Trump. There’s a raid at Mar a Lago. There’s a first indictment. There’s a second indictment now there is Devin Archer. And we’re going to play that tape in a minute. If you could do that right? Sure, sure. Let me queue it up here.
Yeah, if you could queue that up and play that. That’s very important. I am going to be one of the witnesses in this case. This is actually very significant. And the damage I believe that Jack Kelly and the Democrats, by attacking President Trump the way that they are, are actually empowering President Trump to bring forth all of the evidence on election fraud that the courts wrongfully refused to hear back in 2020.
This entire episode would have been avoided entirely if the courts had done their jobs when 21 Republican state attorney generals brought lawsuits challenging the electoral count and asking for the courts to hear the cases of fraud and to make a weighty decision that would have forestalled all of this trauma for the country. It is a disaster that they refused to do it, as we knew it was a heartbreaking mistake.
But it is because the courts failed to act before that. We are now here today, and I am going to be a witness in this case. So please play what the attorney is saying. Alina Haba coming up for a couple of questions here. How you doing? Hi. How are you? Good. The fact that I am standing here for the third time in five months is not a coincidence.
This is the Biden political law fair that we have seen time and time again. It is a deflection from everything that they have done. And if you don’t believe me, look at the facts. On March 17, Hunter accidentally admits that it was his laptop from hell. The next day, DA. Alvin Bragg indicts President Trump. June eigth. An FBI document is released showing that the Ukrainians paid the Biden crime family millions and millions of dollars.
The next day, the Mar a Lago raid and the Mar a Lago indictment. Last week’s, Hunter Biden’s sweetheart plea deal fell through when the judge realized it had blanket immunity. The following day, a superseding indictment against Donald Trump. July 31, devin Archer goes to testify in front of the House. That was only after they failed to put him in jail prior to the fact. What happens the next day? The January 6 indictment that we’re here for today, this is not a coincidence.
This is election interference at its finest against the leading candidate right now for president, for either party. President Trump is under siege in a way that we have never seen before. President Trump and his legal team and everyone on his team will continue to fight, not for him, but for the American people. I’ll take some questions. Thank you. I know the president has called this a witch hunt.
You just laid out several examples of that. Any other thoughts that the president has communicated to you in terms of why this is going on and why he calls it a witch hunt? I think a witch hunt is really the way that anybody should describe this, because it’s not something we’ve seen in our time. This is not even political. This is beyond that. A witch hunt is when you relentlessly attack your opponent, when you relentlessly attack the thing that you are most afraid of.
People are afraid of somebody that cannot be bought by washington. People are afraid of somebody who is independently wealthy and who has given up his good life to fight for this country. And that frightens a lot of politicians who are career politicians, unfortunately, because he’ll get back there, and I know he’ll be fighting for every one of us so that this doesn’t happen to us. Trump could have disagreed with the results and talked about it.
No crime there. The difference is what he did to try and switch the vote. So what is it that he did to try and switch the votes that you referred to? By bringing cases, by using the law in an appropriate manner, unlike what we’re sitting here today seeing, this is not appropriate. What President Trump did is he said, go patriotically and peacefully and protest. That is an American right.
That is why we are America, and we are not a third world country. Although I will say that today, I don’t feel very much like we are in America. This case should go forward before or after the 2024 presidential election. I think that every court needs to look at this as a whole, right? It’s not about the January 6 case. It’s about the fact that in the matter of a couple of months, we have seen them try and tie up, and me as an attorney, I’ve never seen this tie up one individual who’s running a campaign, in a campaign running for office, for president so that he is in court, in depositions and distracted, so that he won’t properly run for 2024.
And frankly, it’s not going to work. Is the legal team going to argue that the election was stolen? I don’t think that that’s the argument that needs to be made. I think that anybody that believes that is misreading this. The truth is, as an American, there were questions that he had regarding the election integrity. We’ve seen documents come out, we’ve seen documentaries come out showing that there were issues with the election.
And frankly, bringing this I don’t think Jack Smith really thought it through. There only has to be proof that, number one, president Trump believed that this election was not completely honest. And number two, Jack Smith has opened himself up to a can of worms that we can now look at and really examine. You believe that he’s innocent and that this is all a setup? Why not bring you to trial as soon as possible before the election so that you can clear his name? Yeah, I would love to do that, but there’s something called discovery.
And when somebody wants to say that a 2020 election was perfect and that President Trump has no right to object to it, we’ve got to go show them all the facts. And there’s a lot of facts to show. So everybody has their time. And to say that Donald Trump should then be rushed and not be given the same fair proceeding that anybody else is, is just, frankly, unamerican.
It’s not fair. It’s not the way our system works. A lot of the lawyers who helped him try to overturn the election are unnamed co conspirators in the indictment. Jenna Ellis isn’t there anybody else? I represent President Trump. Cut it there. Okay? This is very important, and this is why I am already on the list as a potential witness. Whose list let me just tell you what’s going on.
The question is, did Trump knowingly deceive his voters, his magabase, by claiming that there had been election fraud? That when he had no knowledge, that he did not possess any factual evidence that would have supported this? You and I did something together. I had contacted you, and you had given me Sydney Powell’s contact information. And I ended up speaking with her staff and Jenna Ellis and Rudy Giuliani’s staff regarding two major cases that I had become aware of.
I had received intelligence from a Chinese whistleblower, including video of Georgia ballots being printed in Guangdong Province. I received that. I forwarded that. You personally gave me Sydney Powell’s contact information, and I forwarded it, spoke with the people there, spoke with the investigator Able. And with regards to the Georgia case, trump only needed to win Georgia or Pennsylvania in order to take the victory. And if he had either of those two states, he would have been able to declare straight out victory.
In fact, there is evidence that I was able to supply of both of them. And so we have a situation where, in the case of Georgia, there is the whistleblower with the video, and it’s devastating. It is boxes of ballots piled up, stacked up, and you can see the printing press. He gets a close up of what it is printing out, and those are explicitly Georgia ballots, georgia Senate race, Georgia presidential elections.
It’s very clear. It’s not a generic. You don’t know which state it is because it has the Georgia Senate race right underneath the presidency. So you can see that it’s very clearly a Georgia ballot that is being printed in China. They were selling these ballots in Canada. They were selling them online out of a bricks and mortar warehouse in Canada. And this information was then sent to Sidney Powell and was then forwarded to the investigator.
This is devastating if there is any prosecution in Georgia. But what Jack Kelly has done with his superseding indictment, he is trying to absorb all these cases of election fraud into one Washington, DC. Case where he expects to have a devastating jury that will be pro Democrat, deeply hateful of Trump. And that is going to is that is inevitable at this point. But the point is that he has now opened up the opportunity for Trump to show the evidence of his fraud and to prove that this is so important.
Because Jack Kelly’s burden of proof is that he must show that Trump knowingly deceived his voters, knowingly proselytized, propagandized something that he was completely aware that he was fully informed was totally false. And that’s how you push in the evidence of the fraud. And the reason that I would be that obviously the Chinese whistleblower is the primary witness. But what matters is that we can prove that Trump’s legal team was fully apprised of these very specific things.
And that’s where I get to testify, because I’m the one who took it to them. Not only was the evidence out there, but it was delivered directly to Jenna Ellis, Sidney Powell, and Rudy Giuliani. The other thing that matters, which you did not know about before, was the Pennsylvania case. I have an NYPD, a brilliant source in NYPD Organized Crime Division. And the NYPD Organized Crime Division has contacts up and down the East Coast with regards to drugs, prostitution, online gambling, all of those things.
And so the NYPD task force is multi jurisdictional. And he has a source. My NYPD detective source has a confidential informant in the South Philadelphia mob. And the South Philadelphia mob had been bragging. And he was one of the people who got the information directly from the mob and stating that they had been paid $3 million to fill out 300,000 ballots for biden specifically, only they were not filling in anything below the biden.
It was just a vote for president, not a vote for Senate, not a vote for Congress, not a vote for governor. Anything else? Only the presidency. And they filled out 300,000 ballots. They were paid 3 million. My NYPD source was told by his confidential informant that the two locations, the safe houses used by the mob, where these ballots were filled out, and he wanted to deliver that information to Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani.
Now, this exonerates Trump and his co defendants not only in this case, but in any future case, because Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City, would have every reason in the world to have confidence and trust in his own NYPD detectives. And this NYPD detective is willing to testify for Trump. He’s a huge believer in honesty and integrity in the legal system. He’s appalled by the weaponization of this.
And his former partner is now part of the Attorney General Criminal Investigation Division. So now is now part of that Alvin Bragg team. So there’s all kinds he’s not part of the Alvin Bragg team. That’s not true. That’s not the right way to put it. But he works for the division that Alvin Bragg draws. So my NYPD detective is hyper aware of the politicization, can testify to that politicization in New York as well.
He has direct knowledge of that as well. He’s a brilliant witness. He’s taken the stand many times in testimony against the mob. He knows how to present his evidence in court. He knows that it is absolutely relevant, and he will be. I can assure you. He is willing, capable, and devastating testimony. Where I would come in is the fact that not only did this evidence exist, but I made sure that they had it.
So I can say that it’s hard to know if it’s an affidavit that I will give an affidavit, but whether I would be actually called as or not, it is the linchpin to be able to prove that not. Only was the evidence out there, but that Jenna Ellis, Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani were receiving it and acting upon it. And their investigator was making calls about these things. And we were having a lot of feedback and a lot of interactions on this.
And that goes to the critical point of the problem with Jack Smith’s indictment, that he has to prove that Trump would knowingly deceived his voters, that he was not honest. Well, and that’s where he loses that. Trump knew that he was not know. I’ve heard it. Okay, enough. Put on our legal hats for a moment. And what you’ve said is important. It needs to be compartmentalized. All of us have played a part in this, and the only thing that matters are facts, evidence, substance.
Yes. So you have to produce irrefutable, airtight, absolutely solid facts, and materials and documents and videos or audio recordings or whatever it is in order to introduce it. Now, I’m going to put my lawyer hat on for a minute. First of all, if I was Trump’s attorney, I would be going into this indictment and the other indictments and filing a motion, first of all, a motion for dismissal, a motion for summary judgment, and say, Your Honor, this is politically motivated.
It’s prosecutorial a misconduct. It’s an actuality fraud upon the court. This is being done purely for political, calculating reasons, and here’s why. And that attorney, Alina Abba, or Abba, whatever her name was that we just saw, she’s very well spoken. She puts it out there on this state this happened. And immediately following, the Democrats in the deep state did this. Then this came out, and they did this.
And the sequence and the immediate follow up is very obvious that this warrants a Sue Esponte investigation by the court. To say, prosecutor, similar to what you and I have talked about before with the prosecutors, recklessly and in fact, irresponsibly and in violation of the Constitution, went after certain politicians. I think it was like in Alaska. The Weiss guy went after that Alaskan politician, and then Senator Stevens.
Thank you. And the court eventually found them to have violated all sorts of rules and sanctioned them, got them in trouble. So Trump’s attorneys need to immediately come in and say, your Honor, we want this thrown out. This is complete. Let me finish, please. This is all fraudulent. This is all politically motivated. We’re asking for the court to take this action after the court says no. And this is where things get real dicey.
I know the courts. I know the judges. I know what they can do, you do, too. Yes, what they can do. If they fail to administer a summary judgment, at least that is preserved for immediate filing to the Supreme Court for an appeal, immediately appeal to the Supreme Court. And then also they need to be filing civil suits for prosecutorial misconduct besides civil suits against Hunter Biden. I want to see all the little girls that he raped and sexually prostituted filing a civil suit against Hunter Biden like they did Epstein.
Why isn’t that happening? Oh, that would be brilliant. I want to see all sorts of stuff. Now, here’s the danger. These judges, Susan. They can. I saw it with Jim Fetzer’s case where the judge refused to allow into evidence certain materials that defy common sense, that would have completely exonerated Jim Fetzer, but the judge said no, and it went up to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court wouldn’t hear it, and all sorts of stuff happened.
There is a chance that the judges, if they’re absolutely corrupt, will not allow Trump’s attorneys to introduce certain materials, introduce certain exonerating exculpatory materials, as bizarre as that sounds. The judge can say, nope, I’m not administering that into evidence. So there is a problem that’s where you and other whistleblowers and other people can come in and testify, because, for example, there’s a lot there. I was there. I go back to 2018 when I met General Flynn’s brother, Joe Flyn, and I said, you got to get your brother to fire Covington and Burling, the law firm that represented Union Bank of Switzerland and the Clinton Foundation, and did this shell game of terrorist financing using Union Bank of Switzerland.
And Joe Flyn and I met Sidney Powell, and she wasn’t his attorney at the time. Joe Flyn took it to his brother and Sidney Powell met him and he said, Fire Covington. And Burling hired Sidney Powell. Sidney Powell called me and said, scott, can you give me information on Covington and Burling? I did. She filed a motion in court. The court dropped all charges against General Flyn. That’s where I came with Sidney Powell.
Now union bank of Switzerland I studied in the army as doing terrorist financing with the Clinton found that whole shell game which can be brought in because not only does it impugn and establish a character of Biden and obama and what they were doing with money laundering and racketeering in Ukraine and all that, but Union Bank of Switzerland that I presented in shell game that Sidney Powell and all these people knew about came up again in november of 2020 when I went back to Washington and worked with Sidney Powell and Joe Flynn and General Flyn and Patrick Byrne and a whole bunch of other Giuliani and kerik and an ambassador from South America and all sorts of colorful people.
And there are a lot of people that were back there working on this election fraud. Lots of people. This wasn’t just. Some pie in the sky fantasy. There were solid Republican people that were working because we were deadly serious. This was a threat to our country. They were actively stealing the election. And Union Bank of Switzerland entered again. This is why Trump believed that the election was stolen.
Among many other things, the Union Bank of Switzerland was working with the Chinese Communist Party since 2009 and from 2009 to 2020, the Chinese Communist Party union bank of Switzerland under Robert Wolf, Chairman of the Americas worked with Staple Street Capital to purchase Premier ESNs and Dominion voting machines. And we gave that to Paul Gosar. His staff contacted me. You put me in charge of contact with Gosar.
That went and I also gave that when I was back in Washington, I gave a briefing on it. I said, the Chinese Communist Party and Union Bank of Switzerland are at it again. Here’s the document. And the AFL CIO and Ses were planning on disruption. They had a whole plan from September to January of what they were going to do. I presented that to Pat Byrne, Joe Flyn, General Flyn, Sidney Powell, all sorts of people saying, here’s what they’re going to do.
And what do you think that was? November 2023. Months later january 6 they did exactly what I presented. All of this was getting to Trump. All of this was getting to Trump. And he knew all this stuff. Hell, I gave Trump a memo back in 2017. He’s known about all this. Sidney Powell, Patrick Byrne, and Joe Flyn go into the White House and say, mr. President, here’s all the evidence of election fraud.
And he’s yep, yep. And here’s your, uh this is fraud. This is a theft of our election. This is a coup d’ETA. This is the Chinese Communist Party working with the Democrats to steal the election. You can do this. You can declare this. You can go into these states. They have a whole bunch of options for him. And what happened rudy Giuliani shoots down that idea after when Sidney Powell, Pat Byrne, and General Flynn left the meeting with Trump, which he was going to do.
Everything they said when they left, rudy Giuliani comes in and no, no, we’re not going to do that, and scuttle the whole thing. Now, I don’t have too much of a faith or trust in Rudy Giuliani. He was a son of a bitch that allowed the 911 events to go on, and his chief commissioner, Police Commissioner Kerik, was also part of that. Kerik was back in Washington working on this Trump analytical thing.
So I don’t trust these people yet. They were working allegedly on Trump’s behalf or to help him. I don’t know. I don’t know that. Plus, there’s all sorts of talk about Giuliani over drinking and all sorts of stuff. So there’s a lot of fishiness here. There’s a lot of parasites involved here. I want to stick to just the facts and the substance. What you know and what I know and what others know need to be in amicus briefs, need to be in testimony for the President to say all of these people were presenting clear and convincing evidence of election fraud.
Hell Dinesh D’Souza could come in and say, hey, based on the 2000 mules and the calculations we had, all this fraud occurred. And that turned the election, that turned it against Trump. And that is exactly the brilliant part of it, because Jack Kelly has opened the door for Trump to prove why he believed all of this factual evidence supported his claims that he had been robbed of the election and nothing was dishonest about it.
The Democrats like to say that 17 courts or whatever, how many, dismissed Trump’s lawsuits because they had no merit, no evidence and support. That is not factually how it works. The courts have to decide to receive the case, to accept the case. And until that happens, none of the evidence, unless the case is accepted, none of the evidence is heard at all is revealed, and none of it is ever.
And that’s why the courts failed us so badly. By trying to shut down, they thought they were saving the United States from a traumatic aftermath of this hellacious election mess up, cock up. And in fact, they triggered a domino effect. Not only were people angry, but there really was fraud. That has now become a politicized weapon as Democrats try to silence all voices that make these claims. But when it comes down to hard evidence and credibility of witnesses, you have an NYPD detective who can testify 300,000 fake ballots in Pennsylvania.
You have a whistleblower in China who has video, by God, it is devastating. Video from Guangdong province of printing presses, churning out thousands of Georgia ballots. And he said there were also ballots from Wisconsin and Michigan and Arizona. But we don’t see that on the video. We only see the Georgia ballots. But that is enough right there to say that if Trump had won Georgia, he would have won the election.
And in this case, there are witnesses from Georgia and Pennsylvania. And this exonerates the legal team because Rudy Giuliani, whether you like him or not, doesn’t matter to me. Doesn’t matter at all. Rudy Giuliani, as the former mayor of New York City, can say, look, NYPD Organized Crime Division comes to me and says, we’ve got evidence. Our confidential informants are telling us of this. I trust my NYPD detectives.
They’ve never let us down before. This guy has used this confidential informant in five other cases, major racketeering cases put these people away for decades. And I trust NYPD case is over. The case is over. Trump is going to win this case. But the best part of it is that in the course of winning, all of us can talk about the real fraud. Like, you remember coming back and doing the analytics and I think it’s important because I know what those analytics were.
But I would like you to step back and detail what when you say we were running analytics, tell them what you mean. What does that mean? Well, when I went back I know what it is, but you tell us. When I was back in November of 2020, working with army intel people. Army cyber people, navy intelligence people. Pat Byrne had financed our operation. General Flyn. Joe Flyn was there.
Sydney Powell special, shall I say? Agents were brought in to take our depositions. And I gave a deposition about shell game, about terrorist financing. About Union Bank of Switzerland and the Chinese Communist Party working. What was the analytics? Well, the analytics was the banking evidence of the relationship between Union Bank of Switzerland chinese Communist Party staple street capital their purchase of the voting machines, purchase of the voting machines purchase of the Dominion Voting all the bank records all of the records all of the documents that showed the financial relationship that showed from 2009 to 2020, the evolution of the relationship with Union Bank of Switzerland, the Chinese Communist Party.
In China they made buying Dominion Voting Machines. And there was one other thing that you did. We looked at the lack of certification for the voting machine processing. One of the naval intelligence people had brought this up saying the accreditation had not been reaffirmed since 2018. That was another issue, was the voting machine accreditation hadn’t been updated. So there was funny stuff there. Okay. And I remember, I’m going to cut you off because this is so important.
You also were tracking election night hacking from China, targeting individual precincts. What you discovered, what your team discovered, which was the most devastating of all. What you’ve said is very important, but it was the most devastating of all. They were able to track coming out of China, hacking raids, cyber attacks on individual voting precincts in Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, Georgia, counties in specific counties, in specific counties that were kind of mixed.
And you were seeing the votes go up and down, and you guys were tracking how the votes were high, and then all of a sudden, they flip around, and you were showing that there was hacking attacks from China into the individual precincts in Georgia, for example. Arizona. Wisconsin was another Michigan. Those four states, I remember, and that they were targeting very just small, little precincts. But the votes were then flipping around and the analytics was showing that the votes were going like crazy in the middle of the night, and it was all at 03:00 in the morning.
So when Trump was talking about 03:00 in the morning, there’s all kinds of crazy stuff going on. He’s actually referring to the United States Defense Intelligence Agency, US. Army that had monitored China cyber attacks on US. Elections. And that is an act of war. That is an act of war when China is using cyber threats, and the military is watching it, and they’re like, Holy. Well, there were also explorations into servers that were in Germany that were similarly having material stored and being hacked and all sorts of electronic signatures which were very dubious.
And it required. And that was part of the whole push to President Trump to say, there is so much here. There are so many bells and whistles and sirens going off, and this is November before Thanksgiving. So before Thanksgiving, like on November 20, we’re saying, there is so much here. Ses, the AFL CIO, the Chinese Communist Party, Union Bank of Switzerland, the servers in Germany, the electronic voting machines that are in these key counties and key states besides the fake ballots and the videos of the ballots and not even getting into the 2000 mules and stuff there is so much here that it demands the President issue a stop, a halt to all of this and to put special personnel into these areas, into these counties to get the machines to do the counting to treat it like a foreign threat operation.
The Democrats love to tell the lie about Russian interference. This was actually Chinese interference with their partners in the Democrat Party. The president was given all this material by Pat Byrne, Sidney Powell, and Joe Flyn going into him saying, here is all the stuff that we have. You need to initiate certain presidential actions and decrees that will stop all of this. You don’t have to rush ahead with the election.
This can go on till February. The Constitution of the United States has all these procedures and it can be pushed back till February. And this is why it has to because we’ve had electronic manipulation of the election. We’ve got the proof of that by an enemy. By an enemy, and it even involved. And the whole January 6 was a cover up operation. It was a psyop. And again, that was also presented in November 2020.
Here are their plans. The AFL CIO, the Senior Executive Service, other parties, they’re going to do some disruption operations. And here on January 6, they infiltrated Trump MAGA groups and they started going into the Capitol, breaking windows, making a lot of noise, all sorts of mobbing activity, pretending they were Republicans and they weren’t. But it was used as theater, as a Psyop to rush through the electoral votes of Joe Biden.
That’s in violation. Also, the Lloyd Brunson case that said Gosar and others said there’s a national security threat. All of this needs to stop until we determine if we have a foreign enemy interfering with the election. And every member of Congress should have stopped and said, we can’t proceed until we examine is there a national security threat. That’s where Pence committed treason, and so many others did. But Pence in particular, he should have stopped everything.
He should have said, no, we’re going to reject this, give it back to the states, and the states would have voted. But Pence is the traitor he was who took the bump from Nancy Pelosi and the coin. He allowed this overthrow of Donald Trump. He alone allowed all of this. Well, now, let me just say that each of the states, there were six of them, I believe, that presented alternate calling.
The media is calling them fake electors. But what these states did was they were required under their own state laws in obedience to the state laws. There are procedures where if you are going to challenge an election, then you have to have the alternate electors present, briefed, approved, so that they are ready to act on that day in the event that that individual state’s elections are overturned. So it’s not just enough in procedurally, like in Pennsylvania.
It is not enough just to say there was election fraud. We’ve got a problem. You also have to be ready with the alternate electors in case the courts accept it and they’re not fake electors at all. They’re saying, okay, we have a second set of electors. In the event that the court accepts our case, we have to be ready if the court rules in our favor, we must be ready with the alternate electors to cast our ballots on January 6.
And that’s where the courts really failed us, because this was a weighty matter. And Judge Roberts was heard in Washington. The story was that he was screaming at his fellow court, supreme Court Justices, and that they were screaming at each other. They could hear them out down the hallway and they were like he was like, You’ve got to get in line. Amy comey. Barrett, neil Gorsuch, Bret, Kavanaugh.
Those three were new. And Comey Barrett was just what was brand new, and they were can’t. You have to do what we say. You have to do what I say. I’m the Chief Justice and I don’t want to have this case in our courtroom. But the state of since when did Roberts have that kind of authority? Absolutely. But they were new and they didn’t understand their own powers.
They should have told him to screw off. We are obeying the Constitution and this is a threat to the national security. Absolutely failed our nation. This was a case that desperately deserved to be heard by the courts. This is what happens when the courts abdicate their responsibility, when the people say, we have a serious crisis and we need the judges to weigh in and bring the solemnity and the gravitas, hearing the different positions and arguments.
The best judges were in Michigan. There was a judge in Michigan who allowed the presentation of evidence and who made careful decisions and carried an investigation that actually confirmed that there was some voter fraud and that the machines, the Dominion machines, were not functioning in subcounties. Now, he did determine but he heard the case, but he did determine that based on what they were able to show not enough counties would have been affected to switch the election from Biden to Trump.
But he heard the case, he stepped up, and he evaluated the evidence, and he said, you know what? There is a problem here, and we’re recognizing there’s a problem. Now, the second part of it is, does this because in Michigan, I believe it was 150,000 votes that would have had to switch from one to the other, whereas Wisconsin, it was 20,000 votes. And in Arizona and Georgia, it was 11,000 votes.
So in Michigan, the one place where they did it right there was just not enough. The judge said, look, you’re correct that there were problems at the county level, but not enough votes would switch from one to the other to actually overturn this. But he was the one judge in the entire country. The other judge was in Wisconsin, where a retired state Supreme Court chief justice took the case.
And he was digging into all sorts of problems. Wisconsin had more votes than voters, literally. They had 105% voter turnout in Milwaukee and Madison. And Trump lost the election by 20,000 votes. And the Supreme Court justice, the retired Supreme Court justice who was taken on to investigate this matter, the bureaucracy was like, It’s not our fault. Don’t blame us. Don’t blame us. And they were like, we’re good people.
If you say that we have failed in our obligations to run good elections, then you’re saying that we’re bad people. It’s like, no, we’re not saying you’re bad people. They tried to make this a personal attack. Like, I’m a devoted bureaucrat. How can you say that I would deliberately do this? But the problem was that you had these Chinese printing presses that are producing ballots. We’re going to have to come back next week and explore this because it is so important.
And I think this is a common theme that you and I alone can really develop, because we’ve been there. We provided material. We’ve been we provided you and I both contributed to this, and I am ready to testify, and my NYPD detective is ready to testify. And let me just say, whistleblower in China is going to testify. Well, that’s Georgia and Pennsylvania right there. This is not about President Trump.
This is about our country. This is about our Constitution. So I don’t want people to get this notion of, well, are you just doing all this to help President Trump? No, I’m not. I’m doing this because what they do to President Trump, they do to all of us. What they did during the election was a profound betrayal and act of treason that I swore an oath to stop, to defend against, and I am continuing that.
I know you are, too, Susan. This is something we have to rise up and with a righteous indignation and might present what we know, what we’ve done and present the evidence before the authority to say, here it is and in our opinion it makes all the difference and it’s why Trump is not guilty of any of these crimes. But more importantly, the country and the election, by looking at this evidence, was obviously overthrown.
The election was overthrown and these criminal scoundrel traitors need to be prosecuted in prison and given the death penalty. In my opinion, after due process of law. This is due process law. I want to finish. Let’s stop with that. No, I’m not. No I’m not. I swore an oath and wore the uniform and I’ll be damned if these bastards are going to be doing what they’re doing and escape the death penalty.
I’m not saying about just taking them out and hanging them like a lynch mob. I’m saying let due process of law take its course and give them the death penalty after due process of law, after the facts, all of the evidence is put forth. But listen, we’re out of time. I want to end on this. What do you think all of this is going to do to the American people, the American hearts and minds, after they finish their summer vacation? How is this going to begin to affect psychologically, emotionally, physically, the American people? What are they going to be thinking and doing? Susan, psychologically this opens the door for President Trump to prove election fraud.
It was a devastating mistake by Joe Biden. Joe Biden is going to be impeached. He will be impeached by the House. They will run an inquiry. It will play all over the conservative media, all over Twitter, all over social media, and people will see the evidence. They will hear of the election fraud again. Remember that Twitter has now been acquired by Elon Musk and that means that it is now open, that it is open to free, accurate dialogue evidence that was being controlled, the controlled opposition is now gone.
It’s been removed. Now people can actually speak. There can be a discussion of what you and I actually know and we will not be repressed anymore. This is a very powerful moment for our country to take back our nation and it’s going to be a painful twelve months, I think, before the November elections. Well, let me just say this. I think, number one, to answer my own question, I think this is going to arouse and clearly begin to put everybody who is a conservative or Republican, a moderate, a conservative Reagan Democrat, independence.
I think that is moving all of those people onto Trump’s side because they’re doing it to Trump. They’re not doing to the Republican Party or DeSantis or anybody else. They’re doing it to him. And everybody’s watching and they’re going, wait a minute. And it’s such a contrast. You’ve let Hunter Biden and the laptop and the raping of little girls and getting money from China, getting money from Ukraine and Barisma and all this and the Ukraine war and all this jazz and the russia hoax and the weaponization of the FBI and all this, and then Hillary Clinton.
People have accumulated a big bladder of all this stuff for the last ten years, and now they’re seeing all of this. And I think they’re at their pop moment where they’re going to go, wait a minute. We have to stand with President Trump. Not because we like him or agree with him or may even vote with him, but we have to vote for him and side with him here because what they’re doing is so out of the American Constitution and the American tradition, the American identity.
If they do this with Trump, if they get away with this to Trump, we are all going to be turned into serfs and slaves of a Democrat police state that has rainbow faggot flags, life change eating bugs and every form of unnatural evil and perversion. I think that’s in people’s hearts, it is a police state. The problem, and I think that this will force everyone who’s been on the fence, they will force them to confront the real evil that is coming out of Washington.
And I think that a lot of people that you can no longer turn away from it. You can no longer pretend that it’s not there. But also, I think you’ve got to realize social media has suppressed so much fact. People claim they didn’t know about the Hunter Biden laptop. How could you not know about the Hunter Biden laptop? But people didn’t. People say they had no idea. The media covered it up.
The mainstream media, ABC, NBC, CBS, and social media did it, too. They all covered it up. Half the people who watch the blogs, who watch the podcasts are well informed and they know events that we’re talking about right now, but the other half are completely well, it’s not Lahal. Susan, the alternative media people that watch our show and others and Rumble and Alex Jones. That’s 25% of the country, maybe 30, 70% dumb as a bag of rocks, dopey as the seven dwarves and addicted to nothing but leisure and pleasure and all sorts of crap and have bad diets and are on medication.
And then, of course, you have this. But fortunately, half of those people don’t vote. Yeah, well, we’re going to pick this up. We’ll pick it up. We’ll pick it up next week. I think it’s a very important conversation that no one else can have but you and I. I like that we are in a position to help the President, but more importantly, I think we are in a position, among few others, to help the country and the Constitution.
My witnesses will testify, and I will make sure that they’re already ready to testify. They’re already committed, and I am making sure that I am the link that shows that the evidence is there proving that the attorneys were informed of the evidence and therefore Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, et cetera, lynn wood. All those guys, they were doing the right thing. They were acting on a motivation. All of these people need to be brought in as witnesses for the President in this particular case, where they’re trying to charge him with deprivation of rights under color of law, which is quite ironic and hypocritical, but everybody that played a part in this needs to appear and be a witness for the defense.
Hell, let the prosecutor ask me questions. Ask you questions. We’ll tell them what we know and what we did. And the honest we have direct, immediate contact with the made. You and I personally made sure that Sidney Powell was aware of it and therefore Trump did nothing wrong. He relied on people, and everybody around him failed him. Evidence, quality evidence and very disturbing. 300,000 votes in Pennsylvania filled out by the Mafia for the South Philly mob for $3 million and a promise that Joe Biden’s, Department of justice, would not prosecute drug crimes in the promise that there would be no prosecutions of drug crimes in Pennsylvania.
I want to see my NYPD detective who’s testified in multiple other cases for 30 years, go in and tell that to a judge. And I want the American people to hear an NYPD detective say that they promised not to prosecute drug crimes in Pennsylvania. And look at Kensington Avenue. Yeah. Disgraceful. We will be back on next week and continue the conversation. Thank you so much for joining us, Susan Lindauer, and thank you for joining us on Global Freedom TV, Great Awakenings.
We encourage you to get involved. We encourage you to go to the website Globalfreedomtv. com and contact us there and get the Indian sav. If you have any cancers, melanomas, brain tumors, leukemia, things of that nature, or your cats or dogs. A lot of people are using it for their animals. Go get the Indian black sav before it is too late, before the FDI shuts it down. We have a limited number.
There’s a lot of customers. But go to destroycancer. com or destroy cancer. It’s on the website Global Freedom TV. Very important, very good supplement as well as some mushrooms that we have. This is the time to really start getting yourself prepared for food, supplements, anything, because we’re entering a phase and we’ll get into it next week, too, where the Democrats are going to get so stark raving mad as this starts to shut down.
I could see them doing false flags and doing all sorts of maniacal, self destructive things because that’s what Democrats, rhinos, transgender, climate change, buggy strap in because the roller coaster ride is starting. We will see you next week. God bless you. Thank you for joining us, Susan Lindauer, and we will see you Monday. Good night. God bless. Good night. .
