The Push for Use of DNA as Biometric ID

➡ This text criticizes the use of biometric identification solutions, like DNA-based processes, due to concerns about data protection and individual privacy. It links these identifications to accessing state benefits and further warns against potential misuse by manipulative powers.

This industry report will show you how excited they are about this technology. But don’t fall for the hype. There are not any, there are no beneficial outcomes from this. It’s all bad. And so here’s what the trade publication says. This is the way they couch it. Biometric identification solutions have become firmly established in our everyday lives. Yeah, that’s a problem. Should never have let that happen. Whether it’s security checks at the airports, which is where they run this stuff through, or facial recognition on smartphones, the next generation is already waiting.

DNA based processes not only ensure precise identification of individuals, but they also raise data protection to a completely new level. For citizens, proof of their own identity is key. Why is it key? Well, for state benefits. You see, that’s how they hook you in. They hook you in with a welfare state and that’s what Gates did in India with the, well, you know, go the poor people and we’ll tell them that you’re not going to get any state benefits, not going to get any welfare payments, not going to get any health care if you don’t take the number of the beast, the government.

So your identity is key to state benefits, identification and mobility. Well, we got them beat there because you don’t have to do that. If you’re an illegal in the United States, you come in and you get all those benefits without having to show any ID. You’re completely undocumented and unidentified and you can still get all this stuff anyway. Many people around the world still do not have a legal identity that can be verified by a birth certificate or a passport, for example.

And this is where the potential of unalterable and unique DNA comes into play, which can unambiguously identify people in cases of doubt. So this is their case that they’re making for their product. They have some technology they call rapid DNA. Technology solutions can generate DNA profiles anywhere within a short period of time using mobile devices and fully automated processes. These processes do not require any special technical or scientific knowledge and they ensure lossless data generation.

A DNA ID card created this way offers numerous advantages over conventional biometric ID methods, such as fingerprints or facial recognition, or even Iris recognition, because they said the DNA based solution ensures lifelong immutability and rules out tampering. And again, I don’t know, it seems to me like they’re tampering with DNA and planning to tamper with DNA. So still we know that people can alter their fingerprints. I don’t know how you alter your Iris scan, though.

I can see where you could change your facial shape they said this kind of stuff. Maybe the iris scans change over the course of a person’s lifetime, like their facial shape, or can be manipulated through surgery, but not the DNA that can only be manipulated by Pfizer. ModerNa enlightenment is a prerequisite, they said. And so this trade publication says. The problem is the general public continues to associate the collection of DNA samples predominantly with their use in the field of criminal law.

No, I think more and more, we’re starting to understand that the use of biometrics is being used against us by a criminal class who seek to imprison us. I think that’s a problem people are starting to see with all this. Say, well, you know, use your biometrics to unlock your phone. No, I don’t. You don’t have to. Well, you get your biometric information scanned by the TSA whenever you travel.

Well, I’m not traveling, but they keep shutting down parts of our life. But it’s better to cut that off than it is to go into the hell that they have designed for us. An important argument here is that DNA identification is far more anonymous. Oh, is it? And precise than any other biometric methods. They say this. What an amazing lie and an amazing spin. The whole point of all these IDs is to end any anonymity.

And, of course, you got Nikki Haley now jumping on that bandwagon as well, pushing war, pushing the end of anonymity on the Internet and everything elSe, and she’s richly rewarded for that. She has Jamie diamond or Demon meeting with her, talking about giving her money, because she’s pushing everything that they want. The ID technology of tomorrow. They said a DNA ID heralds the coming evolutionary step in personal ID and verification.

In the future, citizens and governments will benefit equally from reliable DNA based personal identification. Yeah, this is their marketing plan. It’s kind of like the video I showed a long time ago of Ukraine. Yeah. By 2030, the war in Ukraine will be over. And, look, we’ll have government IDs, and everything will be so simple. The government. You won’t wait in line for anything. The government will give you your every desire.

This benevolent genie that comes along with your smartphone and your digital ID. The world will be at your fingertips, and your interaction with government will be so easy. And as they’re showing you all these things start to realize just how pervasive they see the government being. In other words, it is omnipresent in every aspect of your life. Oh, well, look, in this aspect of your life, here’s the government, and you’ve got to prove to the government who you are, so that they will give you permission and privileges to do whatever it is that you want.

Oh, well, that’s great. Gee, let’s make that a lot easier. Grant seven. Seven seven. Thank you very much for the tip, I appreciate it. It says Rah, rah. David, my son says we want to make a DNA based identification. But don’t worry, it’ll be anonymous. We’ll know everything about you and we’ll follow you everywhere that you go and grant you privileges for anything you want to do. If we agree with you and if we like you.

But if not, don’t worry about it. Yeah, it’ll be anonymous. One of the biggest lies you’ve ever seen. That’s right up there. Along with the fact that the untested vaccine novel way of doing it will be safe and effective. The David Knight show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you’ve been exposed to logic by listening to the David Knight show, please do your part and try not to spread it.

Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread favour. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask, take your vaccine, don’t ask questions. Using free speech to free minds. It’s the David Knight Show. Healthy. .