Summary
➡ An individual held for over a year without bail, believed to be because he had knowledge implicating Hillary Clinton, highlights concerns about governmental overreach and potential suppression of dissenting voices. Alleged political bias and corruption within the Justice Department, as well as concerning allegations of treason against Mike Pence, escalate fears about political and legal processes being manipulated for ulterior motives. Also, commentators, who call out perceived criminal activities by influential individuals, face accusations of inciting domestic terrorism, stoking concerns about restriction of freedom of speech.
➡ The text discusses a potential threat to the President, which involved online threats that were found to be serious and resulted in an arrest. The suspect showed intent and had weapon capability posing a significant challenge for law enforcement in distinguishing serious online threats that could translate into physical attempts. The incident raises discussions over how to handle such threats, the complications in decision making, and the heightened threat level in a changing political landscape. The text also presents a conspiracy theory revolving around democrats, accusing them of staging the threat to target Republicans and Trump supporters, and plotting potential high-profile political assassinations as part of a larger plan to seize control and demonize opposition.
➡ The speakers discuss concerns about potential fractious behavior in the US, stressing the importance of constitutionality and criticizing perceived mismanagement of power. They discuss theories of staged events to influence public opinion and worry about imminent negative changes in the economy due to international changes in currency and banking, which they believe could lead to an implosion of US power.
➡ The text discusses the dire economic conditions, loss of global influence and impending threats to free speech in the United States. The speaker also touches on geopolitical crises like Ukraine, the rise of the BRICS nations and the ensuing conflicts in the world due to U.S. actions. There’s an anticipation of worsening conditions and possible violence, potentially leading to a break up of the U.S. and various conflicts worldwide.
➡ The text discusses differing views about Trump’s potential reelection in 2024, debates on how political dynamics might be impacted by factors like climate change beliefs and how Democrats and Republicans behave, and questions about potential outcomes in a theoretical court case involving Trump. The international impact of U.S politics, with reference to Europe’s stance, is also explored. Ultimately, the consensus is uncertain, although it leans towards expecting a Republican victory in the next election cycle, though not necessarily for Trump.
➡ The speaker expresses their apprehensions about the approaching political turmoil and how the current political landscape may catalyze a shift of power in the world. They discuss the potential dissolution of the European Union and future possible civil unrest while advocating for preparedness and advising against violence except as a last resort for self-defense.
Transcript
We want to encourage you to get it@destroycancer. com. It is an immune building supplement. It healed me of the skin cancer that I had, and it’s done some miraculous things for a lot of people with breast cancers, all sorts of so, very, very good news. And we want to encourage people to get that. Go to the website. Destroy cancer. And you can see the video and the photographic evidence of what it does.
And we also have our stories up@globalfreedomtv. com. Susan, it’s great to be with you again. I think you’re one of the few that really understands the matrix of law, of courts, of the Patriot Act, of violating Americans rights, of so many abuses that are happening right now. Let me play this video before we jump in with your opening statement, because I think it is necessary to set the tone.
And this is a video that will explain why we’re seeing so much of this stuff happening against Donald Trump involving Joe Biden and others. Let me play this very short. Let me get the volume up, number one. Number two, I don’t make money from China. You do. I don’t make money from Ukraine. You do. I don’t make money from Russia. You made three and a half million dollars Joe, and your son gave you.
They even have a statement that we have to give 10% to the big man. You’re the big man, I think I don’t know, maybe you’re not, but you’re the big man. I think your son said we have to give 10% to the big man, Joe. What’s that all about? It’s terrible. All right, gentlemen, let’s see that one more time. Dead on the mark. Prescient. Absolutely. You listen to those.
And it could be a debate from last night, given that it’s being ripped straight out of here. It’s being ripped straight out of the headlines, and yet it was four years ago. Very scary. Trump is a brilliant president and okay, are you ready to play it? Yeah, yeah. I just want to play it one more time. Play it one more time. Listen carefully, everybody. Number one number two, I don’t make money from China.
You do. I don’t make money from Ukraine. You do. I don’t make money from Russia. You made three and a half million dollars Joe and your son gave you. They even have a statement that we have to give 10% to the big man. You’re the big man. I think I don’t know. Maybe you’re not, but you’re the big man. I think your son said we have to give 10% to the big man.
Joe, what’s that all about? It’s terrible. All right, gentlemen. So, Susan, very powerful statement, because what we’re seeing is a two tiered justice system where the law is weaponized by those who have control of the levers, and they are using the law only for the application to attack their enemies and their political opponents. But the corruption, the deep rot of corruption that has taken over Washington, you would have to cut so deep and amputate so much that you have to wonder what would be left even if you could get rid of all of you know, we have leaders.
Hillary Clinton was guilty of the same thing. Selling foreign policy decisions to our Justice Department, FBI thugs against our enemies for the most obscure, perverse, tiny, little looking for, like, show me the man, and I will find a crime that is straight out of the Nazis from the Nuremberg trials. The Germans said, was it Goring who said, Show me the man, and I will show you a crime? In the Southern District of New York.
They used to have a game that they would play on their lunch hour where they would pick an individual, even like Mother Teresa, and they would find a crime to prosecute her. And they would map out how they would go about doing it for this, picking any celebrity, and then finding something that they could attack them with and then detailing how they would build a case against that individual.
That’s what they used to do on their lunch hour in the Southern District of New York. We are in very serious trouble right now. And the real criminals like Joe Biden received $20 million from China. Joe Biden received three and a half million dollars from the wife of the mayor of Moscow. Joe Biden received untold tens of millions from Ukraine. And it was Joe Biden who threatened to withhold one to cancel, not even withhold, but cancel $1 billion in aid to Ukraine unless Ukraine first fired the prosecutor, who was the Attorney General prosecutor, who was hunting into criminal investigations of corruption by Barisma, which was Hunter Biden’s company.
And it was Joe Biden, not Donald Trump, who threatened to withhold their aid. By contrast, President Donald Trump and no one has ever talked about impeaching Joe Biden over this. It was Donald Trump who said, we need to make sure that the aid money, the billions of dollars of aid that we are giving to Ukraine, will actually reach the causes that we’re targeting with our aid rather than getting siphoned off by these crooks and crooked officials.
Well, now, today we have discovered that Zelensky has Swiss bank accounts and offshore bank accounts exceeding $500 million plus. He’s got houses all over Europe. He’s got a house in florida. He’s got a house in Switzerland. He’s got a house in, you know, all over London. He’s got a mansion in is it he has a house in Paris. I mean, my goodness, this man is the president of a nation that us.
All the taxpayers of Europe and the United States are bleeding ourselves dry to pay for aid to Ukraine. The United States is running out of munitions for our own military, and we do not have the capability to sustain this much longer. And yet we see that the power elite like Joe Biden, specifically the Biden crime family, defended by the Justice Department, are pillaging the treasury. Well, let me jump in there, because one of the things that has just happened with and I’m glad you mentioned the mayor of Moscow, the wife of the mayor of Moscow.
What needs to happen in full transparency is that mayor of Moscow’s wife, who gave Hunter Biden or Joe Biden the $3 million, needs to come to Washington, DC. And give a testimony before the Congress to say, yeah, we gave him money. We gave him money for this. Let the Russians come over and say, yeah, we gave Hillary Clinton money for uranium. But more importantly, let the Moscow mayor come and say, here’s the bank accounts.
Here’s the receipts. Here’s what we gave him. Here’s why we gave it to him. Because we wanted influence. We wanted this, we wanted that. This is what he told us. This is what he did. This is what he didn’t do. We’ve got no shame. This is international politics. But this guy is now waging war against Russia irregularly, asymmetrically through a pond, through Ukraine. He’s taking your money and your sons and daughters and throwing them into a meat grinder and trying to trigger World War II to escape scrutiny.
So the faster this guy can be exposed as the traitor and the criminal that he is, the better for the whole world, really. So Russia’s mayor and anyone else that has been given or has any kind of deal with Biden, the Russians need to come over. It’s similar to what Putin said to Trump. Bring all of your Department of justice people over to Russia, and you will see we had nothing to do with any election meddling in 2016.
And Newt ganggrich and the rest of them went apoplectic because they didn’t want Putin and Trump and Russia having a scrutiny over this election meddling, or they were trying to split the American Russian relationship. But this is a very significant factor that the American come over. Now, the other thing I would like to interject regarding Hillary Clinton’s sale of US. National lands to Russia for uranium production. There was an independent journalist just like us named Pete Santilli, who’s a friend of mine, and he was actually arrested by the Justice Department under Obama prior to the 2016 elections.
He published the story, a deep investigative story into Hillary Clinton’s ties to this uranium trade and kickbacks to the Clinton Foundation. She received millions of dollars in exchange for signing off on this deal. Within 12 hours of Pete Santilli publishing this, he’s actually a radio host. He was on air doing a show about this, and he broadcast about this within 12 hours. Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed off on an arrest warrant, and he was taken into custody.
By the end of the day, people and he was held without bail for 14, 1516 months. No bail. And then when they finally got him a trial, and for a lot of the time, he was held in solitary confinement because they were afraid that he would disclose to the whole world about what Hillary Clinton had done. And this is how they’re behaving. And it’s not just Donald Trump that’s suffering when they come at you with these Justice Department thugs making arrests of citizens.
They’re coming for us. They really are coming for all of us. And it’s know, we have the capability. Scott and I both have the capability to testify for Trump. But somebody said in his case, the Jack Smith case, on the superseding indictment, and somebody said to me, Aren’t you afraid? Aren’t you afraid they’re now going to come back and arrest you to try to silence you? And that is a big part, the desire to silence voices and threaten you, because we have no power.
I mean, we have passion and we have drive and knowledge, and we have power through our knowledge and our passion. But we are outside the power elite. And so by going after Donald Trump, what they’re showing is that if they can do that to him, can you even imagine what they’re going to do to us? And as someone who both Scott and I have been on the receiving end of Justice Department criminal investigations when the government decided they desperately did not want to disclose what we had done, and this is an issue we are in a very deep, troubled age at this very moment.
Well, one thing that’s very interesting, going back to that original debate between Joe Biden and Trump was trump was giving that at the debate, which was like a month before Election Day, if I’m not mistaken, maybe more than a month. And, Susan, every word that, you know, I don’t make money in Russia, you do. I don’t make money in Ukraine, you do. I don’t make money in China, you do.
You’ve got the bribes. You’ve got the Chinese Communist Party in your pocket. You’ve got the mayor of Moscow. You’ve got your son Hunter Biden, and all sorts of other things that the president was briefed on. Susan, he was told about this. He had this from CIA, NSA, all sorts of intelligence sources, I’m sure, were giving him material. Here’s the clincher. Mike Pence had all of that information, too.
Mike Pence as Vice president and participant in his own debate, mike Pence knew everything that Donald Trump knew and was talking about. So when Mike Pence ascended to the Congress, to the Capitol, when the election votes were being tallied and he allowed the election to go through, he essentially was aiding and abetting all of the crimes that he knew happened. He knew the Biden connection to China. To Ukraine.
To Russia. He was in the room when Trump was given that briefing. He knew all of it, and yet he denied it. He said, oh, it doesn’t exist. There’s no election fraud. There’s no Chinese connection to the votes for Biden. That right there establishes Pence as in my mind, is a traitor who should be prosecuted and after due process of law, executed for his actions, covering up what Trump knew.
Now, I am going to say this. I’m going to play this other video. Look, this is a time you’re right. They are trying to make any commentator myself, yourself, Pete Santelli, Alex Jones, they’re trying to make people sound like, oh, they’re domestic terrorists and all that. No, here’s the distinction, here’s the difference. When we comment on the crimes, on the activities that seem like crimes, on the evidence, on the materials, on the testimony, on the documents, when we analyze and assess, as we’ve done in our roles in various government capacities, we are exercising a professionalism and determining these actions.
These documents, these phone calls, these bribes, these money laundering accounts, all of them are unconstitutional criminal activities. And as a result of committing these criminal activities, due process of law requires certain punishments that is not going around making threats or any kind, any sort of threats or insinuations or actions of violence or statements of violence. We are not doing that. We’ve never done that and we never will do that because we understand that is the trap they want to lure people in.
Now, let me play this video to set that. And we’ll come back to you, Susan, to comment on this because this shows you exactly what they’re now trying to do. They’re trying to set the stage for anyone that criticizes Biden or Hunter or demands exposure of the fraud or the bank accounts or the money laundering that somehow this is leading to a domestic terrorist uprising. So here is the video and this all circles around the most latest false flag Psyop, which is pretending some 75 year old guy was going to shoot Biden and the prosecutor and letitia James and all sorts of other people let me play this.
A series of alarming developments over the past 24 hours that all tie back to the fact that a former president with a history of violent rhetoric linked to a domestic violent extremist threat is currently facing serious federal and state did you hear that? A former president with violent rhetoric. They’re trying to say Trump and his violent rhetoric, which is simply exposing I don’t make money in Ukraine, Joe.
You do. But they’re trying to say Trump’s violent rhetoric, which is calling out crimes, is now causing domestic threats further watch. I just wanted to point that out. Listen carefully. A violent rhetoric linked to a domestic violence. A series of alarming developments over the past 24 hours that all tie back to the fact that a former president with a history of violent rhetoric linked to a domestic violent extremist threat is currently facing serious federal and state criminal charges and could be on the verge of a fourth indictment.
We’re learning more about the man who was shot and killed by the FBI as they were serving an arrest warrant over threats he made to President Biden and others. The New York Times reports craig D. Robertson, 75, was charged with threatening to shoot other elected officials, including Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan District attorney, as well as making threats against law enforcement officials, according to court documents filed a day earlier in U.
S. District Court in Salt Lake City. Mr. Robertson owned numerous firearms, including a sniper rifle. The complaint also laid out his history of threats on social media. Other subjects of Mr. Robertson’s threats attorney General Merrick Garland, governor Gavin Newsom of California, and Letitia James, the New York Attorney General. The incident comes at a time when Donald Trump is directly going after prosecutors who have either indicted him, like Jack Smith or Manhattan DA.
Alvin Bragg, or maybe on the verge of doing so, like Fulton County DA. Fawnie Willis. NBC News reports Donald Trump is airing a television ad in Atlanta and other TV markets that attacks the Fulton County district attorney, who could soon charge the former president with his fourth criminal indictment. The new ad, released by the campaign on Sunday, accuses Willis of previous wrongdoing. It also names attorneys who’ve already brought charges against Trump, including Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Now, we’re not going to show it to you. It is filled with conspiracies and falsehoods, and it comes at an exceptionally tense moment in this country. Bonie Willis is addressing the ad, though in a letter to her staff, she says it contains derogatory and false information. She urges her team to stay above the fray. The letter was obtained by NBC News. It reads, in part, we have no personal feelings against those we investigate or prosecute, and we should not express any.
This is business. It will never be personal. We have a job to do in this office. We prosecute based on the facts and the law. The law is nonpartisan. You should feel no need to defend me. I shared with this office at last Friday’s meeting one 1000th of the negative or derogatory comments I receive. I invited you into an hour of my typical day. I am not concerned with the calls, emails or ads, and you should not concern yourself with them.
Your instruction from me is to ignore all the noise and keep doing your job with excellence. Joining our conversation, former assistant director for counterintelligence at the FBI, Frank Segluzzi, also Charlie Sykes, editor at large for the Bulwark. And here at the table with me, former acting assistant Attorney general for national security at the US. Department of Justice, Maryam McCord. Mary, I want to start with you. Talk to us about what we watched out of Utah and the timing the President landing in Salt Lake City.
Well, it’s clear from the court documents that were filed and also from the reporting that this is a man who’s been making threats for some time. It wasn’t like a new, suddenly the President’s coming, I’m going to make a threat. He’s been making threats for months and months now. But here he had opportunity because he lives in Provo, he’s not far from Salt Lake City, and we have the President actually going there.
So I think that really heightens the level of danger here because a lot of times I think there’s confusion about whether a threat made online is serious, whether it’s just somebody sort of talking big and using threatening language but with no intent to carry it out. Well, now we see that there was an intent at least to try to carry it out. We see because of the arrest and the cash of weapons that have been seized, that he had the means to carry it out.
And certainly he was in approximately. Now, I’m not going to suggest you would have ever been successful in actually getting close enough to the President to get off a shot, but he was preparing to make an effort to go do this. So when we talk about what we can take seriously as a threat and what is just talk, we don’t always here, you know, for good reason. The FBI had been tracking this, paying attention to this, and knew it was time to take action, but we don’t always know that.
And part of the problem with the rhetoric that you talked about in your opening is you can’t watch everybody, you can’t know what everyone’s planning, and there will be individual actors who do seek to take action. And this isn’t the first time we’ve seen this. As you know, after the search at Mar a Lago, there was an attack, an attempted attack on the FBI in So, and there’s others like that.
So it’s very hard for law enforcement to know which threats online are going to materialize into actual physical attempts. Perfect. Luzi, you have been in the room where those conversations happen, where those threats are assessed. Talk to us about how those decisions are made ordinarily and the complications of making those choices in this moment. Yeah, the in this moment part is something worthy of lots of discussion. But let’s address how these decisions are made.
First of all, they’re done in concert with the US. Attorney’s office, of course, who’s going to have to prosecute a case if they agree to charge in this case. There were three distinct federal charges that were applied here in the arrest warrant, and a big factor here is specificity as to target time, method, and location of where the threat will be enacted. And we see this throughout his multiple threats.
Not only multiple threats against the same person, but multiple threats against various people. Really graphic specificity, really too much to go into here in this hour in terms of disturbing content, but it was all there and enough for A-U-S. Attorney, and ultimately, a judge would accept this easily as valid charging. And then you start looking at, well, we approached him. We approached him early on in the spring.
We asked him, what’s up with the threats? And he essentially blew the FBI off, saying, hey, we’re done. Come back with a warrant. And immediately thereafter, the subject starts posting threats against the. So, you know, he’s doubling down on the threats. So now, with regard to this environment yeah, look, a lot of hand wringing here about, hey, if we do this, the guy’s elderly, he’s known in the community, the guy goes to church.
This isn’t going to go over well. How do we do it? Well, let’s do it safely. Let’s bring a SWAT team. It turns out to be a barricade, not surprising. And there’s a back and forth. You can even see some of it in a video by a neighbor that’s been released. Hey, get the hands up. But I’m told repeated commands were given and repeatedly refused. This guy refused to comply, even.
I’ve heard some reports that a drone was sent in to scout out what’s going on with this guy, and then some negotiation, all of it failing, ultimately untold. And we’re going to hopefully hear more from the salt lake city FBI office this afternoon. Ultimately, there was a threat posed to an agent. An agent fired back at this guy because there was a weapon, I’m told, that was involved.
So the bigger picture here, Alicia, moving forward, is, look, this is not the last one we’re going to see. Quite the opposite. This is stochastic terrorism. This is the idea that people can be incited to violence by a leadership figure who is painting another group or individual as less than human. Dehumanizing them. They’re evil, they’re bad, and therefore, it makes it much easier for people to carry out violent acts on behalf of someone else’s ideology that they’ve adopted.
And I’m telling you, every democrat in Washington kind of made fun of the color coded threat level we had for a while today’s. Orange, it’s yellow, it’s red. If we had that in place, we would be changing the color and escalating the threat level as trump continues to face charges in trial. Sorry, I’m sorry, I can’t listen to that any longer. Carefully. Sorry, I cannot listen to that any longer.
Let me comment. First of all, when I look at this as a psychological Operations Officer, and I did this for a living. This is a setup. These people on this news broadcast, the FBI guy, McCord, they’ve all been involved in the actions against Trump, from Russiagate to the whole Clinton scam to everything after Trump was elected. All of these people have played a role. So they’re coming on MSNBC now.
What have they done? They have carefully positioned language that establishes this guy went to church and he was well known in the community, and he made posts on social media. All of that is a lie. He does not exist. He was an actor. He was not known in the community. He did not go to church. The social media posts most likely were coordinated between Obama FBI agents and their FBI agents now working at Facebook to create the posts and then share the posts.
So Laurel and Hardy laurel and Facebook shares it with Hardy over in the FBI office, and suddenly they can put a whoa. Scott, his neighbors have said that they knew neighbor? No, I’m sure the same crisis actors can be developed that they witnessed the attack. The neighbors watched the SWAT team go in. Yeah, but you don’t know who these neighbors are. You don’t know any of this. This whole thing stinks of a setup.
So I don’t accept anything. I may be wrong, but I’m not accepting neighbors as even existing. I’m looking at the whole thing because here’s what it looks like. You are hearing them set up a patsy or a false flag or they’ve done this intentionally to create, as he called it, sarcastic terrorism. Did you hear that? Yes. So he has used the word sarcastic terrorism. So when you are sarcastic against Hunter Biden or Joe Biden or any of the criminal activities, when you’re sarcastic, you’re a terrorist.
Because you are now an incendiary amplification. You’re an amplifier of rhetoric that crazy people are going to take and act and use to commit a presidential assassination. That’s their game, is to put out this rhetoric to begin to demonize Trump supporters. And here’s why, and I’ll stop and I’ll hand it to you, because they are going to assassinate to first, or they’re going to kill assassinate Kamala Harris first and then position Gavin Newsom into the vice presidency or someone else, but I think it’ll be Gavin.
So they’re going to assassinate her first, then they’re probably going to assassinate Biden. So Gavin Newsom, whoever they put, is automatically ascended into the presidency, and they’re going to blame it on a Trump supporter. Or maybe they’ll get Zelensky to come over and stand next to Biden and they’ll blow them all up together and say it was Russia and a Trump supporter. Don’t think anything is off the table with these Democrats because they know they are being scrutinized every day.
Every day, a new bank account is open. Every day, a new whistleblower comes forth. Every day, a new document comes first. They are creating volcano. They’re creating the scenario of an assassination to demonize Republicans, demonize Trump, and say, when we indict Trump a fourth time in Georgia, when the judge puts a gag order on Trump, and that judge says, he violated the gag order and I’m going to throw him in jail.
When they do this to Trump, they’re going to try and say the reaction, which they may also provoke is domestic war by the Trump supporting fanatics that were the responsible parties at January 6. It’s all a lie. It’s all a Psyop, it’s all a theater. But the inevitability, Susan, is they’re so gone, they’re so deranged that what they’re doing is actually going to tear the country apart into a civil war because and I’ll end it here.
Stephen Pigeon made a very good comment. He said, when the Ukrainians overthrew Yanukovych, when you could say, when the Democrats overthrew Trump, when they overthrew Yanukovych and declared they’re in charge, the eastern part of Ukraine said, we’re not part of your coup. We’re not following you. You do not have authority over us, you’re CIA puppets. And that was the split between eastern Ukraine and western Ukraine. If they do this to Trump, if they throw him in jail and even kill him in there and start to really go draconian, they will cause a split in the country, and you will see a civil war.
You’ll see parts of the country saying, no, we’re done. You’re completely off the reservation. This is not the American Republic. It’s not the American Constitution. You have become a tyranny. You have become a hilarious fascistic. I mean, right out of 1939 all over again. Susan, I’ll hand it to you. I got to speak. There’s so many points that you have discussed. Here something I totally agree with you.
This is a false flag. I do believe this was a real assassination of a 75 year old American male, american conservative male, who they would love to paint as an enemy of the people. I don’t buy this thing that Jim Fetzer puts out, that these are just crisis actors. Well, I haven’t got that from Jim. I don’t know what he’s put out. I’m saying that, okay. I do not believe that he’s a crisis actor.
He’s a real man, a real assassination and real false flag. They are desperately trying to paint the MAGA movement, just ordinary conservatives, as violent aggressors, destroying our community, destroying the peace of mind of our community, the peaceful enjoyment of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the American nation. And the false flag is everything. I want to stress that I have a different opinion. Believe scott and I both believe that treason is being committed all around us.
I would caution every one of you to pull back. Scott, you two, from rhetoric about executing don’t say that. Please don’t say that. I am afraid I am involved in projects at this moment where I am. Literally afraid that the FBI and I’m the good guy. I am not breaking the law. I am in daily consultation with an attorney who is giving me feedback saying, okay, you take this this.
But it is to the point where I must consult an attorney to make sure that I do everything the proper way so that I am not attacked in the future as I go forward. So I am making every good faith effort not I have to be because I’m the one out there as a potential witness in one of I am. If there is a case in Georgia, as it looks like there will be, it is very possible that I will also be a witness in that case.
What is happening now is that everyone who stands up for truth, all the truth seekers, all the whistleblowers, the witnesses in these cases, we are all going to be scrutinized like crazy and torn apart, and we cannot afford a single misstep. That’s right, Scott. That includes calling for the execution of these people. Well, let me qualify that statement. No, let me qualify that statement. Let me qualify my statement.
Don’t go on. Let me just say for the record, I have never nor will I ever call for the unlawful, unconstitutional execution of anyone. I do as a military officer. Look at the intelligence materials, the data, the documents. And as an American citizen, I am prosecuting the culprits in my own mind as if presenting the evidence as Tucker Carlson did, to a jury, to the American public. So when I present material, in my opinion, that has been assessed and analyzed, I’m presenting it saying based on my professional expertise and experience and knowledge based on my assessment I am saying that my assessment is concluding that these individuals specifically, joe Biden is president because he’s been entrusted he has sworn an oath as every American politician and military member has as well every government worker.
He has taken an oath to support and defend the constitution of the United States and to enforce the laws. When you violate that and when you violate it out of a sense of betrayal, conscious betrayal, I’m going to take $30 million from the Chinese and consciously betray my country. My experience tells me that can be interpreted as treason. Now, based on treason, the punishment for treason, according to the laws in the Constitution can be execution.
Now, I’m not the executioner. No american citizen is. That is something for the jury of American citizen. It’s very dangerous for me when you say that, and I’m a guest on your show. No, I understand, but let me finish. Let me finish my point. Please don’t interrupt me. So I’m concluding by saying when I am presenting that based on my experience, these actions may warrant treason, that a jury of American citizens convened by the courts at the appropriate time in the future may conclude that these actions warrant execution for treason.
I’m not advocating it or doing it. But to hide and shy away from that is beneath me, and I consider it cowardice, and I will never do it. Now, I’m not reckless in my life. Said that about me when I was under arrest. I don’t know anything about your arrest. I know about mine, and I know more. I don’t care. I’m talking about now. And I’m wiser now to their games and tactics than I ever was before.
But when I speak, it’s with authority and it’s with conviction, you are smarter now than you were before. So you’re not going to fall into the traps. You’re not going to be labeled domestic terrorists. You’re not going to go crazy things. But this is important, because either no, you never did. You never did. Nor are you and nor will you ever, because we are constitutionalists. We are American patriots.
We are citizens in support of our Constitution. But what we’re witnessing, I think, is a grotesque betrayal of the Constitution and the weaponization of government. And the media is a complicit part. Now, this right here should be opened up in a congressional hearing. Let a congressional hearing analyze this man. Who is he? Where is he? Where is his posts? Who collected the posts? Who reported it to the FBI? Who are all the people in the chain of custody of the situation? But that won’t happen, because if they did, your prognosis would be proven right.
It is a false flag. It is a setup for another theatrical event, which may include their assassination of Joe Biden, which they will then blame on a Trump supporter. They did it in Nazi Germany, for Christ’s sake. With the Krellnak Kristalnacht. Right. They blamed the fires of Germany on the Jews and all sorts of other stuff. This is classic propaganda. But anyway, I’ll stop there. I’ll hand it back to you, Susan.
Let’s finish up with the Biden assassination thing and where it goes, and then move into well, I think that we are all moving to a very dangerous point of the US government. We are run by a cabal of punch drunk, power drunk fools who are making very bad decisions on the economy, on energy, the US dollar. There’s going to be a big event on August 22 23rd. China and the BRICS nations will be holding a summit in South Africa.
They are prepared at that time to announce that more than 30 or 40 nations are forever abandoning the US petrodollar as a currency of exchange. And China is getting ready to announce a gold backed currency. And we are going to hear a progress report on China’s efforts to build a parallel banking system that shall be closed. People think of a banking system, and they think of east west, east west, and they think the money goes round and round.
This banking system will be a closed banking system. The money and gold here will not cross over to London, New York. The Swift. It won’t cross into the Swift. It’s an alternative to the Swift system. It’s an alternative to the Swift system. And I will be debriefing all of you more on that as we go forward, because I’m also involved in that issue at a very close level.
We are about to see drastic changes, and it’s not going to be just inflation and gas prices. As these countries move away from the US. Dollar, the price of product imports will go up dramatically. The United States will be forced to pay the full price. Right now, our purchases are subsidized to the tune of $1 trillion a year for our commodities that we’re importing that will now be gone.
And so the real cost of manufacture, the raw materials for production have to be factored in. The manufacturing, the labor has to be factored in. Transportation from Asia into the United States has to be factored in. And all of these goods will become infinitely more expensive to the point where we are looking at a major economic crash, turning point, like a flipping over. We’re going to capsize the system.
It’s going to be a very scary transition. And the United States is not in a leadership role. We are in a very bad place right now. And so when you have the Vatican economy, the economic factors that are converging fast and the implosion of the United States as a superpower with irrevocable consequences, this is an implosion that’s just like pulling it’s like a pulling down a vacuum, sucking out the power of the United States.
And when it’s gone, it’s lost forever. So you had the higher prices, the poor economic conditions. You have the loss of influence in the world. And now we’re going to see what happens with freedom of speech and the threats that I ask everyone to be very respectful of your neighbors and please do not let’s try to all of us try to avoid violence as much as we can.
Well, of course we do, but we’re heading into a time of where violence will become a trigger response, trigger response on all sorts of issues. And we’re all looking at a situation where in five years it’s going to happen so fast. In five years, the United States is likely to break apart. Well, it will. I’ve been saying that elections to be the last. Well, we won’t even get there.
We won’t get there. Doug McGregor has said that as well. We’re not even going to get to the 2024. What you’re describing is that we’ll get to it and we’ll get through it. But no, we won’t. We won’t get to 2028. No, we won’t. I don’t agree with that assessment at all. I think the tires are coming off the car right now, and in the wintertime, things are really going to get bleak.
I mean, we have to play this out in the timeline. Now, 2024. No, I don’t think it’s going to last long. What you’re describing, remember, these are interesting things, because what you’re describing in the economic implosion and the rise of the BRICS nations, the rise of the multipolar world, which has not occurred in a vacuum. It’s because of the weaponization of the dollar and the tyrannical behavior of the United States since George Bush and Dick Cheney and an endless military juggernaut which traveled around the world, burned the world to the ground, pissed off every Arab and Muslim person you could imagine, and now the we’ve, we’ve destroyed our reputation, but we’ve never learned.
And Trump, even when he came know, did some dances and Dallys and tried to pull us out, but then he did some real stupid things by keeping us in Syria. Oh, I love the oil. Well, that’s what pirates say. Are you a freaking pirate? That’s a stupid thing to say. Oh, I love the oil. And you’re giving weapons to poroshenko in Ukraine to wage genocide against the eastern Ukrainians, that’s a dumb thing to do.
And to piss off the Russians in Ukraine that see the weapons and the missiles and the biolabs and the NATO army there as a threat to Russian people and culture and motherland who’ve already went through this under World War II and Nazi Germany and Napoleon Bonaparte. You think they’re going to put up with shit like this, Mr. Trump? No, they’re not. And they didn’t. They came into Ukraine and have done a clean you know what’s going to pop over here, Susan? They’re going to do false flags over here.
We’re going to have multiple pops. One thing’s going to hit, and then they’re going to do something else. It’s like Trump’s attorney trump’s attorney had said, very nice. Cute girl, by the way, alina Ababa or whatever her name is. But she said every time there’s a hunter, Biden, Joe Biden, revelation and document and whistleblower, they have another charge against Trump. They have another indictment, they have another mainstream media, and now they’ve got the old 75 year old guy that they’re claiming was going to assassinate shoot Joe Biden and all.
A 75 year old guy, okay, please. I could see something else. But they’re pulling that rabbit out of the hat and they’re setting the stage. Well, everybody who says mean things about Biden is a domestic terrorist. That is amplifying the rhetoric. You’re a racist, you’re an ageist, you’re discriminatory. They’re going to engage repeatedly in this. But here’s the thing, Susan, from a macro level. Let’s look at Ukraine, for example.
Ukraine is on its last legs. Zelensky is a dead man walking. I think they’re going to blow him up and claim it was done by Russia, but they’re going to blow him up. Russia is going to push all the way to Poland. But they could take Zelensky. Remember, they did this in the 50s. They took the Ukrainian government and put it in exile in, I think britain, Germany, they were running a Ukrainian exiled small group, claiming it was like the Iraqis.
Remember when they took the Iraqi government of the guy who was in Britain? They did the same thing with Ukraine in the think they’re going to take Zelensky out or kill him and take his entourage out and say, you’re the real Ukrainian government in Britain or Germany and try and wage this. Yes, yes. And in fact, that accounts for all the real estate that they’ve, zelensky has acquired.
Massive real estate in London in all the capitals. London, Paris, Bonn and Florida, of all places. Florida, yes. But the Russians are going to get in a government in exile. I like that’s. What they’re going to do. That is a very clever now, if they put Zelensky next to Biden and they blow them both up and say it was Russia, well, now suddenly you have you have now we need a draft, now we need to do one for the Gipper.
Now Joe Biden is the real martyr, says Gavin Newsom, the new vice president who becomes the President. Now, all sorts of things may kick in. Oh, Russia in collusion with the Trump supporters, right. They were doing this in Russiagate and they’re doing it now, even though it’s all lies. The democrats live and breathe on lies. So I anticipate them doing some of these things. They’re going to try and turn the country into a police state.
Now, I have a question for you, Susan. If the economic collapse of the American dollar happens, what happens to all of the other pesos and things like that in Mexico and elsewhere? Do their economies absolutely collapse, which would explain a massive rush up into the border? Or do they get stronger? They get stronger because they turn to BRICS. BRICS will invest heavily in all of these countries and Mexico is going to join the BRICS nation.
Well, actually, let me say this. Mexico’s president said most recently, like a day or two ago, they are not going with BRICS. They’re not going to. Why? Because they don’t want to be Imran Khan. The United States got rid of Imran Khan, the Prime Minister of Pakistan, when he was sidling up to Russia. The Mexicans have said, we don’t want a similar situation, we don’t want a coup d’etat, we don’t want America overthrowing.
I did not know that. I did not know that. Just said that. He said, we’re not going to go. But he was encouraging other countries. Now, I could see him shift his story real quick and go, finally, after second thought and the collapse of America, considering that their citizens are invading, pouring into our borders. Yes, biden is allowing this to happen at any time in the future. India and Mexico can both turn around and do 180 degree turn and come out in bricks.
But I predict that all those countries, it is only the United States that’s going to fall the city of London will fall. Europe will fall. Well, look at France. Let me ask you on France. France has all of these African migrants burning down Paris, which they haven’t really got too crazy about yet, but now France is going to go into Niger and create a Vietnam guerrilla war, potentially.
Do you see them doing that? And causing a major fight back with Niger, which Russia would help and other nations would help. Remember Iran, russia and China would step in and help Niger. Just like the west has gone into Ukraine, they could go into Niger and all those blacks that are in Paris, suddenly they start burning Paris. From within. I could see Macron and France completely collapsing if they do an intervention in Niger.
What are your thoughts? I think you’re absolutely Arabs. I think this is a very dangerous, a turning point, tipping point, when Arabs in European countries and they are rising as a minority, they have one in five Europeans are now Arab and Islamic. So they are anti Christian, they are anti Western, they are pro Islam, they are pro Eastern, and they do not share the values or the civilizational, education or aspirations that the Europeans have.
They have an entirely different history, cultural experience, expectation for what they want to achieve with their lives. And that does not include education and high yield, ambitious performance. They want welfare, they want government subsidies because that’s what they’re coming out of in the Middle East, and they want obedience of women. They are not interested in enslavement of women. The Sunni Wahabi Madrasa mindset is not the alawite Syrian or the Shia Iranian.
The Sunni madrasa Wahabist ideology is enslavement of women and killing of women if they go, and the castration of women that we’ve seen that before, and their infection into Europe is going to cause, I think, the complete breakup of Europe. I see Europe going into a complete civil war with the collapse of the energy as winter comes, I could see Europe going into a tumultuous. Now, the thing that I feel I agree with you on every point except for the timing, I think we have a little bit more time, and I think that what’s going to happen.
I feel very strongly about this, that the Western leaders, because Europe is pro climate action, they share a value system on that point alone with President Biden. And I think that they will be afraid to see Trump come into power. Yes, november 2024 I think that Europe will do that. European leaders will do everything possible to delay the climax of violence, the explosion of violence, until after the November 24 election.
So I think that it’s going to be very close. But everyone, all the world leaders together are going to group together and try to push this over the line so that they can get past the election, get Biden reelected, and then have Biden die off somehow. And Gavin newsom come in. However they do it, they just have to get past one more year. Well, the whole thing about climate change religion in Europe, which is total delusion and Europeans are complete idiots when it comes to this, of course.
But their worship of the climate and gradivan Thunberg as their high priestess and eating bugs and all the rest of that jazz all of that vanishes out the window when they can’t heat their homes. They start starving. They have to eat sawdust bread. And the physical realities and malnutrition and the suffering that we’ve not seen in Europe, I don’t think, since the Black Plague. Susan when a black plague sort of desperation and hunger and freezing and suffering comes mean like we’ve never seen before, I think they’re going to jettison their high convoluted, high brow, arrogant, super educated, climate change ideology brainwashing.
I think they’re going to put that under the pillow in preference for a crust of bread that Russia may throw their way. Since Russia has the climate religion, I think that they can’t well, they only have two choices eat or die. I mean, climate change doesn’t quite happy for other people to die. That’s the thing about the liberals and the Democrats. Liberals and Democrats always feel that it’s acceptable for somebody else to suffer so long as it’s not a liberal Democrat who’s suffering, only the conservatives or the Republicans.
So I think they’re quite capable of shifting the suffering onto other shoulders and the responsibility for holding together the society will be stripped away. But I really deeply believe that they will try to help Biden get over the line in November 24. Let me ask you what you think is going to happen with Trump’s judge? What is your experience in the legal system and what is your instincts about Trump’s judge and what’s going to happen in the courts? The theatrics of the drama of the next six months to a year? How is this court event going to unfold? Do you see this judge who was the one who imprisoned Marina Buttina? She’s worked at a law firm with Hunter Biden.
She demanded that the Office of Refugee Resettlement give abortions to girls and all sorts of other stuff appointed by Obama. Do you see them really imprisoning Trump and even killing him? Do you see them going this far using this? Here’s what I see happening. I do not know if Trump will win the election. I am less of the mind that he’s going to win that election. I think he will be acquitted in Georgia, I think he will be acquitted in Florida.
And I think that the people of the United States will see, they know that something terrible is happening right now. I do not think that they’re going to want to elect Trump as president because even if he wins, he is so old, he is 77 right now and Americans, they’re afraid of a retribution. See, honestly, I see someone like Vivek Ramaswamy winning, or DeSantis, though DeSantis probably declared his presidential aspirations too soon.
He should have. Probably if DeSantis had waited until now, when Trump is facing his fourth indictment, and if he had waited until now to get to the race, I think he would have had a very good shot. But I think he’s come in too soon. But I don’t think that he’s down and out yet. I think it’s between Trump, DeSantis, and Vivek Ramaswamy, possibly Tim Scott, though one of those could also end up as vice president.
I like to see Vivix Was Swami is the vice president. But here’s the thing. I think that Trump is not going to win the election, but I do not think that the Democrats will win the election. I am totally convinced Gavin Newsom will not be president. I don’t believe that. I think that the American people will turn against the Democrats in Toto, plus they will be against Trump, but they will accept a different Republican, and that different Republican will get into office and immediately sign a blanket pardon of Donald Trump for any and all cases.
So I believe that Donald Trump will be spared prison because the next Republican president will immediately sign on his first day of office an order what do you call it? A pardon. A pardon on his first day of office. He will sign a pardon, and Trump will not do prison time. But I do believe that Trump will not win. Well, let me just say, I was speaking with Stephen Pidgeon, who’s a constitutional attorney yesterday, and he said everything that Trump has done was covered under presidential authority.
He has not he’s not done anything that can be prosecuted in charge. However, that being said, we know the theatrics and the drama and the total corruption of these George Soros type prosecutors and the Obama appointed judges. They have no allegiance to justice or the Constitution, no integrity. They are political fanatics, bigoted, racist fanatics. This black judge, Tanya Chirkin, racist, bigoted fanatic. And I’ve seen them up close and personal.
They’re the most vile people you can imagine. Nasty, self hating people. So they’re going to go kamikaze against Trump. I would disagree with the assessment that Trump is not going to be a denominator in the president precisely because and in proportion to the entire drama of the political rhetoric of the Republicans is building up like a snowball rolling down the cliff. And that is every day, every whistleblower, every indictment shows massive corruption from Obama’s regime until now.
Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden. I know that from the shell game experience and reports. So the corruption and the corruption that weaponized James Comey and the FBI and Peter Strzok and Lisa Page and the Russia Gate hoax weaponized, all of that against Trump. An outsider who was elected by the American people because he was an outsider. He was not Mitch McConnell. He was not Paul Ryan. He was an outsider, and the American people were wanting that, desperate for that, he gets in.
I believe because of the betrayal and all of the material that’s being exfoliated by the Republicans, jim Jordan, Gates, Monica Taylor, Green, they are bringing out all of this stuff. I think that is going to be the speech that never ends to say, if you don’t vote for me, you’re voting for a government tyranny that will transgenderize your children, take them away from your home, castrate them, force you to wear the rainbow flag, force you to engage in climate change, force you to give this up, to give that up.
Take away this, turn you into slaves, open your borders and turn America into a third world where these elites in Washington can pretend that they’re the puppet masters. You may not like Donald Trump, but if you hate slavery and tyranny more, you have no choice or not to vote for Biden. I would just say that’s the political rhetoric is becoming the election issue. Only Trump can speak that.
Okay, I don’t think that’s true. That’s where we disagree. You don’t think Trump can speak that? Hold on, but let me speak. I do not believe Trump is the only candidate for the Republican Party. I think he is. The more Trump talks about retribution and he gets angry and he shows signs of post traumatic stress disorder, and he’s been showing PTSD before he ever got these indictments, he was already showing signs of PTSD.
And I think that he cannot handle it. And when I see him become violently enraged like he does, and splat off, he tells me that I need to look for a different Republican presidential candidate because I as a woman for all the reasons that we’ve talked, about all the issues that you’ve said. We must have a strong, competent presidency. Strong, conservative, values oriented, American, pro constitution presidency. And we need a government that can be functional and rapidly turn this thing around.
And if we have a president who’s getting revenge you didn’t support me on that day. I didn’t like that statement you made. I’m going to get you, then we’re done. And I’m not going to vote for vote for Scott. I am not going to vote for Trump. Well, that’s very telling. It’s very informal. I voted for I know. No, it’s a valid point, Susan. Look, this is the delicacy and the calculations of political arithmetic that need to be absolved and brought in and really looked at.
You’re right about the post traumatic stress disorder. That’s why they’ve been doing it, to I’ve suffered post traumatic we all have. I know what it is. It’s a very painful thing to say that you cannot support someone because that you think that they’re not going to be capable of handling it. Our nation is at a turning point. We always say those words. Every election is the most important election.
Election is going to turn our country around or we’re going to lose it. Well, this one really is, I agree, really is a point where if the Republicans lose this presidency, in this election, our nation is finished. We will be breaking apart the country. And I disagree with you on we’re going to get through 2024 because the Europeans will push us over that line. But we will not make it to 2028.
We may not even make it to 2026. Trust me, I know. Look, we’re witnessing a complete polar shift of the world. It’s like the north. I remember there were climatologist discussions and I know we’re coming out of time, but there’s always these climatologist discussions where every 10,000 years the Poles flip, right? The north pole and South Pole flips. We are going to witness the flipping of the poles with the multipolar world and the disintegration of the unipolar world, with all of the things that are in motion, all of these train wrecks that are coming.
Ukraine. Zelensky the Russian victory in Ukraine. Europe having all sorts of chaos because of the immigration that they put in since 2014, 2015. We’ve talked about it ad nauseam. All of these Muslims that have come up from Africa and elsewhere into Europe like a powder keg. Africa now turning to Russia, Central and South America and Mexico flooding up the southern borders. All of these things are going to start popping like firecrackers.
And you’re right, in many ways the question is, is Europe even going to be a sustainable? Is the European Union? And I would say no. The European Union itself is going to dissolve like NATO and you’re going to go back to what it was when I was born and grew up, which was a hodgepodge of different countries, different cultures, different languages that got along but didn’t love each other.
You got the French, you got the Germans, you got the Italians, you got Luxembourg, you got the Danes, you got the Swedes, you got the Finns, you got the Scottish, you got the Irish, you got the English. We’re all different in Europe. We’re not the European freaking Union. And I think we’re going to go back to that where European nations are going to return to, and that’s where you’re going to see certain European nations like Hungary go.
There won’t be one black African or one Middle Eastern refugee coming into our country or they’re going to be dragged out of our well, sweden has already distributed itself, already has no go zones, and they’ve prepared themselves for civil unrest and potential civil war. They have training. What do you do if a civil war breaks out? Great question. You either win it or you lose. No. Sweden has actually passed out pamphlets.
In the event of rioting and civil strife in your neighborhood, in your immediate ten block range, here are the things you need to do to protect yourself while the riots are underway. What do they. Say, this is what you have to do. It’s been a long time since I’ll put it this way. They’ll be saying, just hide in the basement and it’ll all pass. They say you need to have water and food and you need to prepare for a civil response.
You need to have enough food to hide in your house for 30 days. You know what the Susan is, though? The reality is it’s not going to be 30 days. It’s going to be 30 years. Unless you stand up against that civil war and kill and destroy the invaders who were burning your country down. If you don’t rise up to meet a civil war and be victorious over the aggressor, you’re going to be enslaved.
I would like to propose that we not kill anybody. Well, I’m a soldier and I’ve been in war. I’ll tell you that’s where this goes, because civil wars are not polite. Well, I’m sorry. When you have hoodlums coming around burning down your homes or your cities or going after your daughters or your wives, you’re either allowing it or you’re stopping it. And you can’t stop violence like that without equal and superior violence.
Well, now, that is a debate for another time because we’re at the end of this show. But I am an anti war activist and I hope that you’re wrong on that point. Well, thank you for joining us. God bless you, Susan. It was wonderful. It was very healthy. Always enjoy your debates. Thank you, tong and thank you for joining us in Global Freedom TV. Remember, act responsibly, speak eloquently.
We are not about violence. We do not advocate for any assassinations or executions or murders or anything like that. We are conservatives. We’re traditional people, religious people, republican people, libertarian people. We are constitutional people. So we stand for law and order. We stand for our rights under the Constitution. We never surrender them. And we are taking our country because it is our country. We’re not serfs. We’re owners of this country.
Never surrender. Amen. We will see you next week. God bless you. Good night. Okay, good night. It. .
Author
