Talked in the past about George Soros’strategy, mentioned it just before we went to break. He’s at it again. He’s now funding local Democrat party races in Texas. And of course, he spent a lot of money on district attorney races, on state attorneys general races throughout the country. This is a strategy that was discussed during the transition period between Obama and Trump. Obama and Eric Holder talked about how they were going to focus on district attorney races and on state attorneys general races.

And we see the results of what that brought forth in California and in Texas in the past. And I don’t know what the situation is right now with the current district attorney. He may have eventually gotten his way, but when he first got into, interjected himself into the district attorney race in San Antonio, George SOa spent over a million dollars on that race. And the guy who is the incumbent is like, what is going on here? He defeated Soros at least that first time by going public with it and saying, look at what Soros is doing.

Why does Soros want this guy? Do you want Soros determining who your local officials are going to be? And he won by doing that. He won by running against Soros. Some of the other people didn’t and they lost. But now Soros is focusing more broadly. He’s working with Texas majority PAC. He donated six figure sums to the Democrat Party of Hildago, Cameron and Dallas counties, all of which are plurality or a majority of Hispanic.

That says the Texas Tribune. But here’s the message here, folks. All politics is local, and he’s pouring money into local races. He’s an evil guy, but he’s smart. Serpent was the most cunning of all the animals. Why can’t we wisen up? Why can’t we focus on local elections instead? We are focused like a laser beam on what is happening in the elections, that we have the least amount.

It’s inversely proportional. Presidency is the thing that we’re most focused on. After that, we’re focused on Congress, and then after that, we’re focused on the governor’s races or, you know, the order of importance and influence that we can have and the ability to make change is exactly the opposite of that. Then he’s started it with economic sanctions. He’s done it with an invasion at the border. And you’ve done a tremendous job putting those resources to work.

He told the mayors that as he bragged that he had given them $15 billion for infrastructure and public safety. So, hey, I can give you some more money, and here’s what I would like for you to do. I’m not ordering anybody doing this stuff. I’m just saying, here’s some money and you know what we want done with. He said, when we passed the second amendment, he said, guess what? You weren’t allowed to have a cannon.

This guy is an ignorant liar. Again, what did they come for at Concord in Lexington? They came for the cannons as well as the muskets. And what about Santa Ana? Agoliad, Texas? What’s on the come and take it flag? A cannon. And this is why I get it. It’s a clever thing to put an AR 15 on there, but it’s even more important for people to understand that Santa Ana was coming for the cannon at Goliad.

These militia groups were there to defend their country. And if the federal government was doing its job, it would be training and equipping militias. That’s what a well regulated militia means. Means well trained, well equipped. You’d be handing out Ar fifteen s and showing people how to use them. But that’s not who he is. He’s Santa Ana. He’s George II. He drew chuckles from the mayors as he decried, as he derided an argument sometimes made by second amendment advocates against assault weapon bans, as they say.

Oh, you’ve heard the tree of liberties watered with blood of patriots, he said, guess what, man, I didn’t see a whole lot of patriots out there walking around making sure that we have these weapons. If you really want to worry about the government, you need an f 16. You don’t need an AR 15. And they all laughed. Well, again, this is reported by the Epic Times. And they finished the rest of this article by making a pragmatic argument that the gun control just really hasn’t worked.

Crime has remained high and all the rest of stuff, and the gun control things, that’s not tied at all to. Don’t make a pragmatic argument. Look, there’s so many things we could say. We could make legal arguments, we could make historical arguments, we could make ethical arguments. A bill introduced in the Mississippi House to take steps to limit the impact of CBDC, central bank digital currency as introduced by Republican on January the 18th.

A legislation would expressly exclude CBDC from the definition of money in Mississippi and prohibit state agencies from accepting CBDC as a form of payment. They would do it through the UCC uniform commercial code. This is the approach that DeSantis took in Florida. He was the first one to do it. If you remember Christine Ohm, who just the governor of South Dakota just flew to Iowa to try to lobby Trump for being a vice president.

She was rallying with him and everything. But she talked about the fact that they were running this through, and they said there’s over two dozen states where they were trying to change the UCC code to explicitly authorize CBDC and to explicitly prohibit the use of cryptocurrency. And so she said, I vetoed that, shut that down. And she went on, I think it was Fox News, to tell people that was happening around the place, but she didn’t have a response to it.

DeSantis’s people came up with a response and said, well, we’ll do just the opposite. Then. We will explicitly exclude CBDC from the definition of money in the uniform commercial code, the UCC. And that is now what this Mississippi bill is about. It would add the term that money does not include a central bank digital currency to the definitions in the UCC code. And it gets a bit more specific as well, which is good, because you have to just to say, well, we’re not going to do a central bank digital currency.

Well, we’re not going to call it that. We’re going to call it something else. Right. So you have to completely define what this is. And this is what it says. It defines central bank digital currency as, quote, a digital currency, a digital medium of exchange, or a digital monetary unit of account issued by the US Federal Reserve System, a federal agency, a foreign government, a foreign central bank, or a foreign reserve system that is made directly available to a consumer by such entities.

This term includes a digital currency, a digital medium of exchange, or a digital monetary unit of account issued by the United States Federal Reserve system, a federal agency, a foreign government, and so forth. And similar legislation has already been signed by that. As I said before in Florida, but also in Indiana, and I didn’t see it when it happened in Indiana. So it’s actually passed in Indiana. So this would be the third one.

It would also specifically prohibit all Mississippi government entities from, quote, using a central bank digital currency to receive payment for services, to emit payment for expenditures, or to carry out other functions, such as governmental entities. So they prohibit the state from using CBDC, and they take it out of the UCC code and say, you can’t use this as money. This is similar to an Alabama law that passed in the 2023 legislative session.

So they’ve got two different ways to do it. And several different states now are starting to take this on again. We can shut these things down. If we understand what the global agenda is, we can shut it down at the local level. If we’ve got good people, if we’ve got bad people at the local level, they can make things much worse. You got a bad Soros district attorney, he’s going to drive everybody out of business.

In the spirit of James Madison, says Michael Mahari and his blueprint in Federalist 46, the enactment of this bill in Mississippi would create impediments to the implementation of CBDC in Mississippi. Madison said a refusal to cooperate with officers of the union along with the embarrassments created by legislative devices would oppose in any state difficulties not to be despised. In other words, don’t say that’s no big deal because it is a big deal.

And Michael Maherry goes on to talk about why a lot of people who oppose this say, well, that doesn’t apply because we have, again the supremacy clause, which I played for you, his take on that. When people say, wait a minute, this is even a thing that has to be debated in the Supreme Court, that the Biden administration can’t do whatever they want to with taking down borders and facilitating an invasion.

And so he said it has to be pursuant to the Constitution. But also he said, they will tell you that and wrongfully tell you that the supremacy clause that any federal law will override, automatically override any state law. And he said, we had the same argument where people were talking about legalizing marijuana, but we know how that turned out. And I use that example all the time, not to support marijuana, but to support nullification.

And you have to understand that Jeff Sessions, you couldn’t find anybody that’s more adamantly opposed to even medical marijuana. But he wouldn’t do anything because it would expose the bluff that they had and the bluff that they use in all these other areas. So he said, if you go back and you look at in 1996, when they were doing Prop 215 in California, one of the first places where they started legalizing marijuana, that was what everybody said, well, it ain’t going to go anywhere because the feds will just nullify it.

But it didn’t. And now here we are. We have more than half of the states that have nullified that federal law and there’s nothing that they’re going to do about it. He says similar situation has played out in response to the Real ID act of 2000, and 517 years later, they still haven’t fully implemented it. They’re doing it bit by bit. They’re doing it in many ways by deception, as they do here in Tennessee with the driver’s licenses.

But it has become a big impediment and it has slowed it down significantly. The David Knight show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you’ve been exposed to logic by listening to the David Knight show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread favour. People have to trust me. I mean trust the science.

Wear your mask, take your vaccine, don’t ask questions. Using free speech to free reminds it’s the David Knight show. .

See more of The David Knight Show on their Public Channel and the MPN The David Knight Show channel.