Listen to this. I want them to remember that the FBI, the DOJ, the DOD report to the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives, and that commitment continues throughout their entire tenure. And I don’t want any more Washington speak about we can’t talk about this or we can’t talk about that. The American people deserve courage and commitment and constitutional oversight, and that’s what President Trump is going to deliver. That’s been one of the major criticisms. You and I were just talking about this of Christopher Wray. You can’t classify, up-redact, and sorry, can’t talk about this, can’t talk about that.

You are responsible to the American people. You’re responsible to congressional lawmakers, and you need to give them information. We’re not getting very much over the last several years. No, we were just talking about the assassination attempts on President Trump. The FBI hasn’t released, as best I can tell, because we’ve sued, one FOIA document in response to our request for what happened up in Butler, Pennsylvania, let alone what happened subsequently down in Florida. So there’s this terrible secrecy around the FBI, and the problem that Christopher Wray has is that he raided Trump’s home.

His agents raided Trump’s home, and he knew or should have known there was no good faith-based reason to target Trump, let alone raid his home. I don’t even know how he could look him in the eye, let alone expect to remain as FBI director, just under those narrow sets of circumstances. And as far as I’m concerned, if the FBI is able to, at the point of the Trump administration, should be in large measure to make sure that the FBI, to the degree it remains, can’t ever do to someone else what they did to Trump.

I think that’s fair, and I think it’s fair because not only did it completely fly in the face of reasonable expectation of how they would carry out their responsibilities, I think most people feel like there should be some more consideration before you go do some of the things we’ve seen them do. Want to get your reaction to this, this is from The Times, headline, Jack Smith closes up shop, defeated more by voters than jurors, it says this, but instead of leaving his post on the heels of a courtroom victory, he is departing after a defeat determined largely at the ballot box.

And for all Mr. Smith’s efforts to avoid having his work in Washington politics, Mr. Trump essentially put the voters between himself and federal prosecutors. I think that’s a pretty fair assessment. What’s he in? Yeah, I think the voters found Trump, in effect, innocent on election day. They did. They rejected the lawfare that I’ve been talking about here. Now, Smith is going to still try to punish Trump on his way out. Even Judge Chutkin, who was the judge handling his case up here in D.C., said, oh, well, by the way, he can bring this case up again after he leaves office as if that’s going to happen.

So they’ll try to protect their reputations on the way out. But there needs to be serious investigations as to what went on here. I think if there’s a credible issue about whether these abusers, I call them in the Biden regime and the states, New York and Georgia, abused their offices to punish Trump for exercising his civil rights, that’s a federal crime, potentially. There needs to be a review of that. You know, it’s interesting. I would never suggest that turnabout is fair play and that retaliation is an order. I thought Megyn Kelly, for example, made a great point about it.

But you might be wondering, might that happen? Not because it’s the right thing or even a good thing, but because it’s the human thing, the way this all went down over the last four years plus, I think, is fair to say. Tommy, great to see you, my friend. Happy Friday. And for us, it’s not Friday. It’s Thanksgiving Eve. It feels like a Friday. Have a great holiday tomorrow, my friend. You too. Thank you so much. [tr:trw].

See more of Judicial Watch on their Public Channel and the MPN Judicial Watch channel.