Alright, this is a late-night emergency update. I have some exclusive information and perspective to share with you today that 99% of people are completely oblivious to with respect to what’s about to unfold in the next 48 hours up to the election and what the geopolitical ramifications are going to be. Now before I talk about my predictions for who I think is going to win the election and how that’s going to affect things overseas, I should quickly bring you up to speed with respect to this covert deployment of U.S. forces to the Middle East that everybody is pretty much unaware of except of course for you guys and a few others.

Now right now a total of six B-52H long-range strategic bombers as well as a squadron of F-15 Strike Eagles and several aerial refueling tankers have been ordered and will soon arrive in the Middle East. This is on top of the B-52 Stratofortress planes that arrived yesterday that we talked about that are in fact nuclear capable planes okay. We talked yesterday about the preponderance of force within the region be it nuclear submarines with dozens of Tomahawk missiles, strike carrier groups, amphibious ready groups throughout the Middle East. The United States has a lot of naval assets and they’re amassing a lot of aerial specifically strike platforms within the region.

Now this current administration who is very reticent about aligning too sharply with the Israelis for them to be amassing all of this force on the eve of an election that many think we’re gonna see a lame duck presidency at least you know in the sense that Kamala will not be elected and this will be Joe Biden’s final two months why would they be committing that type of military force in that region at this point of time? Well I think I might have connected the dots okay I think I might have an explanation for why this is happening.

First however I want to quickly tell you about some movements of Iranian forces as well senior Iranian officials are confirming two axios that indeed there was a transfer of ballistic missiles in 74 different areas in Iran and that this is part of preparations for an attack on Israel. Now 74 areas in Iran doesn’t mean 74 missiles we’ve seen when the Iranians launched these missiles typically there’s like a dozen or so at once so we could expect to see hundreds of these missiles but what’s more is that this is going to be a coordinated attack across the axis.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Iran plans to attack Israel with heavier warheads than in its previous attacks remember when we were witnessing that and we thought that the fireballs were rather small this is going to be a different thing altogether and in addition to that its army is planning to join the Revolutionary Guards in a joint attack this signals that this is going to be coordinated across the axis this is going to be the real deal attack by the Iranians against the Israelis which is why the Americans are amassing this force.

Now the question is that a lot of people are asking why does Iran feel the need to do this? It appears as though Iran knows that a fight is inevitable and if you know a fight is inevitable you try to throw the first punch. I do believe that this attack by Iran is going to attempt to debilitate the Israeli forces and incapacitate them in a way that will limit their ability to do any sort of substantial counter attack in the short term and you have to think about this because of course this is going to bring the United States in the war.

Secretary Seqdef said this, Joe Biden has said this as well, that this would be casus belli, potentially for us to enter into the war on the side of Israel. So why, then, would Iran risk bringing the United States and all of its strategic bombers into this conflict just to teach Israel a lesson? It doesn’t make any sense; they know something big is coming.

This is where the election comes into play, guys, okay? Are you ready? Now, what if the chaos that is expected after the election is so bad that they need a massive distraction? Going back to this idea of why would the Democrats, a democratically run government, be sending these bombers, these strike platforms—why are they sending all this shit to Iran? Now, some might say deterrence; some might say it’s continuity-of-government related. It’s possible, but it seems as though it would be more in line with their force postures thus far to just send more defensive types of equipment into the region if their goal was to truly de-escalate, which I don’t think it is.

I think that after the results of the election that half the country is not gonna like, they’re gonna need a diversion, okay? And that diversion is going to come in some flashbulb form. It’s going to likely be a war with Iran, okay? But hear me out on this, because I recently did a poll that asked people, what would you do if Trump loses, or what do you think the result is gonna be if Trump loses?

And I distinctly say “Trump losing” because if you’re reading social media right now—and I understand there’s a social media confirmation virus built into your personalized algorithm, I get that—but it appears as though Kamala is the underdog, or at least has been for the last few weeks. Okay, but that could all just be false. I just say that because it appears as though many people who didn’t vote for Trump last time are jumping over to the other side of the aisle this time.

So I asked people, what do you think the outcome would be if Trump lost? And here’s the results: No civil unrest, 25%; peaceful protest, 14%. So that’s about 38% of a preparedness population that thinks if Trump loses, it’s really not going to be a big deal. Now, this is a preparedness population, so I would think that the average person might even score a little higher on that end.

But here’s where things get interesting: January 6 2.0, another low-level, doomed-to-failure insurrection attempt, 14%—very similar, neck-and-neck with peaceful protests. This makes me think that I should have had another possible option here, like, you know, some violent protests but not quite a January 6 2.0. I think that’s what people are trying to tell me here, that it’s somewhere in between. Civil war, 47.4%.

Now, this is where we have to look at it. If you were our adversaries, right, and you wanted it—let me ask you a question first—if you’re Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-un, Vladimir Putin, Ayatollah Khamenei, who would you want to win this election? So maybe I might say, well, you know, the Ayatollah might not want Putin or Trump to win, and everybody else might want him to win. But it’s actually a trick question, because they don’t care who wins, just as long as there is a lot of social chaos shortly thereafter.

The only way that any of them stand to benefit is if there is domestic discord after the elections that needs to be quelled. That takes away from the United States’ ability to project itself around the world. They need social chaos. Vladimir Putin has explicitly stated he doesn’t care who runs the United States. You gotta think these are authoritarian leaders, as we call them, who are long-term leaders. They don’t look at this president as, in all of their idiosyncrasies, as something they have to wrestle with. They just look at it as another in a series of deep-state interagency continuity-of-government puppets that they have to address and deal with.

They’re thinking about this in multi-terms, okay? They’re not just thinking about it for this term. So what they benefit from most is civil unrest. So if you’re Putin, if you’re Xi Jinping, if you’re Kim Jong-un, you know that at this point in time, what’s going to cause more civil unrest is likely going to be a Trump loss. Yes, a Trump loss.

Kamala winning will—and this is counterintuitive—because yes, I know, George Floyd and the Antifa protests and all this other largely inconsequential shit that is easily quelled, you know, after a few Molotov cocktails are thrown, and they bring in the National Guard, then it’s over, right? These things are not very well-organized. They’re largely decentralized and very benign, for the most part. Yes, they can be disruptive, and I’m sure they would settle for that too; don’t get me wrong. But I think this go-around, many people are actually rooting, at least on that side, for a Trump loss.

Counterintuitively, I think the media, the so-called liberal media, actually wants Trump to win, because they know that their ratings go way up for the next four years. But that’s another story. So right now, our adversaries are banking on Kamala to win, because they know that’s going to likely thrust the United States into a tailspin and potentially cause a lot of domestic violence to unfold. A lot of people who are under, you know, all kinds of economic austerity and immiseration are going to likely take to the streets because you have a lot of really influential people saying very provocative things, like Elon Musk, for example, saying that if Trump loses, it’s effectively over, and it’s the end of free speech and it’s the end, the end, the end.

And so that’s going to cause a lot of people to feel disenfranchised and hopeless. And when that happens, with the people with guns—because, let’s face it, the right, the rural right, have more access and are typically more resourceful, okay? They’re typically older, they typically have more firearms, they’re typically better connected, and, you know, they’re more involved in militia paramilitary activities. So the likelihood for some serious intractable escalation is higher, I think, if Kamala wins.

And I’m trying to say that from a non—you know, an impartial third party; that’s what I’m looking at this as. So what they need, though, to take attention away from that. So when Kamala wins, if she wins—she may not; it might be a blowout, and I want to say on record right now, it could be a blowout for Trump, it really could be. But if Kamala wins, and the reason—if I’m thinking that right, if I’m thinking that there’s a good chance Trump is gonna win, even though Alan Lichtman seems to be very persistent with his predictions and he’s made very accurate predictions that she is going to win. If in fact she wins, they’re gonna need a distraction.

And that distraction is going to be a major flare-up of hostilities in Iran. Think about it: Kamala wins the election, there’s riots in the streets, okay, and people are rallying around the capital once again. All of a sudden, there’s a major attack against Israel, right? And then the USA has to go in there and save Israel, and then we start bombing Iran, and maybe there’s a nuclear incident, and then that’s it—everybody’s attention is taken away by that.

So on the one hand, our adversaries are banking on civil unrest in this order, and I would not put it past them to create some sort of disruptions on Election Day. I would not put it past any of our adversaries to engage in some sort of cyber attack on that day or some other thing that might cause disruption, some other type of, you know, terrorist-style attacks within the country, because it would be an opportune time to do it, because they want to create chaos.

The only thing that brings down the American Empire is internal chaos, and that’s the only way to forestall America’s increasing involvement in all of these conflicts around the world. Anything short of that, regardless of who’s put into power—I mean, just look at the people Trump is surrounding himself with. Lindsey Graham, Pompeo—they’re gonna go in every direction like war hawks, like you’ve never seen before, okay?

And unfortunately, Trump is getting up there in age. He’s very sharp; he has a lot of endurance and stamina, but, you know, we don’t know what he’s gonna look like at the tail end of his term either. And there’s a lot of people who are going to be hovering around him, trying to get him to sign on to things that might be antithetical to the current posture of the Republican Party, as they so claim.

The simple fact that Lindsey Graham is in there, the guy who called for the United States, I think, at one point, to actually nuke Russia—you can’t tell me that Vladimir Putin is happy about that. So a lot of people say, well, Vladimir Putin is distancing himself from Trump and trying to play this impartial outsider for the election, and that they don’t support Trump is just a way to, you know, to appear as though they’re not supporting him when they really are. I don’t think so.

I think they legit want Kamala in there, because they know it will create more social chaos, which will take attention away from what’s going on over there. The best way, the only way, to destroy the United States is with a civil war, so you can’t tell me that they don’t want a civil war.

All these liberal media agencies were like, you know, Elon is talking to Vladimir Putin, and Trump is colluding, including with Vladimir Putin—they missed the point altogether. These guys don’t care who’s in charge; they want the American economy to implode. It’s as simple as that.

So there is no preference for Trump, and Putin is not naive to the fact that it was Trump who planted the seeds for most of these conflicts, and not just Trump himself, but the people who Trump surrounds himself with. Look, being president is busy—I couldn’t even imagine. You’re really just giving speeches, and all of these advisers are the ones kind of making most of the decisions at the end of the day that you say yay or nay on.

So yeah, Trump got out of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty, started a trade war with China, more North Korean launches, and development of nuclear weapons after Trump’s, you know, groundbreaking visit to North Korea that everybody thought was the beginning of peace—the complete opposite, okay?

Killed Soleimani, setting off a chain reaction of things where we find ourselves right now in the Middle East, okay? So nothing is as it seems. Maybe on domestic policy, you might actually see some change there. But guys, I get that some people are really hopeful. I don’t even care at this point, because the fact of the matter is there’s gonna be international decoupling, okay? You’re gonna see drifting into a multi-polar world, there’s gonna be de-dollarization, the debt is gonna continue to increase, the division in the country is gonna continue to increase, the wars are gonna increase, and inflation is gonna continue to go through the roof.

Right now, after this war starts, you are likely gonna see oil go to $200 a barrel, and that is gonna cause literal famine for a lot of people. So that’s what I think this is all about. Look at the timing of this. I mean, this is all coalescing right around election day, where you literally have the Iranians about to do the mother of all attacks—a real attack that will necessitate the United States entering into a major war with them right on the eve of the election.

I mean, this is probably meant to disrupt. This is actually not only the Americans and the Israelis who are colluding on this; the Iranians have a vested interest in creating chaos right now that would, you know, because this of course will lend itself to the divisions within U.S. society.

So on that note, please prepare. Just do some extra things tomorrow, you know, get a few extra groceries, top the gas tank off. In a day, you’re not going to be able to accomplish much aside from stockpiling stuff. You know, get some cash out of the machine—that’s something we’ve been telling you guys to do for a long time. You know, you should have cash, because if those machines go down, if there is a major cyber attack—it could even be like right now—we could have sabotage attempts from within the society, okay?

You could have rogue elements who are, you know, in an attempt to stop people from voting. They shoot a transformer. So I mean, anything is possible at this point in time. So right now, all of our adversaries have a vested interest in us fighting with one another, and that is something that is incredibly important.

It’s too bad that the leadership never seized on that opportunity when Trump was the first Trump assassination attempt to really drive that point home, that the people who benefit most from this are not the Democrats, but the people across the pond, because they understand that the only thing that can destroy a country as powerful as the United States, that’s separated by two oceans, is itself. And it looks like that’s what’s going to happen.

So when they talk about, you know, political disruption, they’re not talking about preferring one candidate over another—farthest thing from the truth. They want chaos, they want chaos. So try not to play into it. It’s gonna be a very tense 48 hours. If Trump gets in, then all that means is that all of this stuff is just probably gonna get used even sooner, and it is going to be harmonized.

Because both parties, of course, at the end of the day, are both beholden to Israel. So you know, if there’s one continuity-of-government staple, it’s support for Israel to the death of all of us. So I think that they’re either setting the next government up so that they can be ready to do their thing, or this is going to be a distraction. Either way, this serves both parties’ interests at this point in time.

Let me know what you guys think in the comment section below. Oil appears to be going up, indicating that indeed something is on the horizon here. So brace for impact, man, because I also think that the economy, no matter who wins, is in for a shock, okay?

I would say the economy is in for more of a shock if Trump wins because of what Elon recently said—that they’re going to be doing some restructuring, which is going to cause short-term pain but long-term gain. Short-term pain because they’re going to have to cut a bunch of programs and do all this stuff, which might have some short—who knows what they mean by short, two, three, four years—short periods of economic contraction followed by a big boom afterwards, or at least that’s the promise.

Buffett is now sitting on a record $325 billion in cash, and that guy is getting old. So I’m just hoping that he’s gonna be around long enough to, you know, tell us what to do next, right? Because if there’s anybody who knows the markets, whether you like them or not, it’s Warren Buffett, and he’s sitting in cash. So that means they’re expecting this whole house of cards to collapse at some point.

They expect the stock market to fall precipitously. They’ve divested in Apple, I think, to the tune of almost—I can’t remember the exact amount, but it is a lot of money. I don’t want to say a trillion in terms of Berkshire Hathaway, but they’ve divested a lot from their Apple position. So that signals that they think there’s going to be a major economic downturn in the future, which could only be caused by decoupling and another war that is going to actually affect oil prices.

So brace for impact, my friends. See you in a bit.

See more of Canadian Prepper on their Public Channel and the MPN Canadian Prepper channel.