COL Lawrence Wilkerson #Reaction to Hilarys Propaganda Ban

Categories
Posted in: Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom, News, Patriots
SPREAD THE WORD

BA WORRIED ABOUT 5G FB BANNER 728X90


Summary

➡ The text discusses the possibility of charging Americans involved in propaganda with civil or criminal charges as a deterrent, referencing historical laws. It also criticizes a woman, presumably a political figure, for her past roles and questions her knowledge of past election tactics.

Transcript

I also think there are Americans who are engaged in this kind of propaganda and whether they should be civilly or even in some cases criminally charged is something that would be a better deterrence because the Russians are unlikely except in a very few cases to ever stand trial in the United States. Would you believe that? Are we going to bring back the Alien and Sedition Acts whereby if you criticize American foreign policy you could be prosecuted? She would. That woman would. That woman never got my vote. She never got my opinion that she could be elected president.

That woman is a disaster. She was a disaster as First Lady. She’s a disaster as Secretary of State. She’s a disaster now. Now what would I do? What would I do if I went to her and I said, do you know what we did in this election, in that election, starting in 1948 with Harry Truman and the Italians? Do you know what we did in this, that, and the other election in the last five years? Well, what if Putin demanded at the UN Security Council, for example, some kind of accountability for those actions? You’re a bitch, lady, and you need to go hide yourself somewhere.

Colonel, I can see Chris and he’s roaring over this. Can we cut what you just said and feature it? You know, we laugh about this. It’s quite serious. California Governor Newsom just signed a law making these AI memes, these deep fake things, illegal. You know, some people put together a satire of Kamala Harris. It’s hilarious. It’s not her, but it looks like her and it sounds like her. We’re not going to run it. How can that be against the law? The Supreme Court has held that satire, propaganda, cautious, harsh, caustic, antagonistic, obscene, hateful speech, all protected, all protected.

[tr:trw].

See more of Judge Napolitano – Judging Freedom on their Public Channel and the MPN Judge Napolitano – Judging Freedom channel.

Author

Sign Up Below To Get Daily Patriot Updates & Connect With Patriots From Around The Globe

Let Us Unite As A  Patriots Network!

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you agree to receive emails from My Patriots Network about our updates, community, and sponsors. You can unsubscribe anytime. Read our Privacy Policy.

BA WORRIED ABOUT 5G FB BANNER 728X90

SPREAD THE WORD

Tags

Charging Americans with propaganda crimes civil charges for propaganda involvement criminal charges as propaganda deterrent criticism of female political figure historical laws on propaganda past election tactics understanding past roles of female politicians questioning political knowledge

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *