Summary
➡ The text discusses the escalating tensions and potential for conflict, particularly involving Russia. It suggests that signs of militarization in Europe are being ignored, and warns that any sudden moves could trigger a faster attack from Russia. The author criticizes the lack of serious preparedness and suggests that the current situation is extremely serious, with the potential for nuclear conflict. The text also discusses the role of technology and space militarization in the escalating tensions.
➡ Russia has updated its nuclear doctrine, which now includes specific conditions that would justify using nuclear weapons. This change, signed by Vladimir Putin, has surprised many and signals a shift in Russia’s approach to potential conflicts. Meanwhile, there have been increased military activities and movements, including drones and missiles, near Russia’s borders. This situation has led to heightened tensions and speculation about the possibility of a nuclear exchange.
➡ The article discusses the escalating tensions between Ukraine and Russia, and how this conflict is linked to situations in Iran and North Korea. It mentions Russia’s construction of mobile nuclear-proof bunkers and the potential for nuclear conflict. The article also highlights the role of NATO and the West in the conflict, suggesting they may be escalating the situation. Lastly, it discusses the potential for a nuclear war and the global impact of the ongoing conflict.
➡ Germany is preparing for potential large-scale conflict, as outlined in a secret document called Operation Deutschland. This includes plans to protect key infrastructure, prepare for military threats, and ensure self-sufficiency. Tensions are rising due to Russia’s war in Ukraine and other global concerns. Meanwhile, NATO is also preparing to move troops and vehicles across Germany if a conflict escalates.
➡ The article discusses the potential for a country to develop nuclear weapons quickly, suggesting they may already have the necessary components. It also mentions a Danish navy ship suspecting a Chinese carrier of cutting a cable, possibly by accident. The article highlights Europe’s efforts to limit China’s influence and warns against underestimating China’s potential military growth. Finally, it encourages support for the channel through comments or visiting a website.
Transcript
Nowadays we have a nuclear superpower with its back up against the wall who views this current crisis as being an existential threat to its sovereignty, who is running out of options every single day. And they have just now ratified a revised version of their nuclear doctrine which will permit them to utilize non conventional weaponry under the right circumstances. Circumstances, I should add, that already exist. The conditions to precipitate a nuclear event have never been so numerous. And when you read this revised Russian nuclear doctrine, it is incredibly detailed. And I’m going to read you some of it today and we can try to do a little bit of brainstorming in terms of understanding what NATO is going to do with this information.
What I fear most is radio silence. We have been privileged up until this point and this occurred to me today. It is very seldom that I have a revelation anymore. The further you get into the weeds with this stuff, the more seldom and more rare those aha moments are. But I had one today and it is that we have become so accustomed to NATO and Russia telegraphing their next move because this is a form of negotiation. We’ve just taken for granted the idea that NATO is broadcasting every single play it is going to make in Ukraine.
And we’ve just presumed that this is so Russia doesn’t find out on their own and risk escalation in that way. Maybe it’s because countries have to maintain their financial books, or maybe it’s to be in line with certain international laws. But there is no law, as far as I know, that suggests that the United States has to tell the world a damn thing about what they provide Ukraine, we just presume when they say, hey, we’re going to send some tanks, some F16, some Patriots, some ATACMs HIMARs, we just presume that that’s how it’s supposed to be played.
But how war is really played is when you don’t hear anything. And need I remind people that at the time of signing this nuclear doctrine and putting it into law, there is no Russian ambassador in the United States. And we are in a situation for the next two months, to be exact. Right on the nose, 60 days. We have a lame duck president and an apparent conflict of interest between this president and the next president that might create some incentive to create chaos before January 20th comes. We don’t really truly appreciate how spoiled we’ve been with all this information about escalation.
This nuclear red line today and some statements made by the NATO chief and other officials within NATO suggest that they are ready to cross Russia’s red line. Now, we’re going to read the nuclear doctrine and we’re going to see what exactly is that going to mean? Does that mean that it’s going to escalate to the use of tactical nuclear weapons immediately, or are we just talking about an Article 5 situation? Article 5, as some strategists have stated, would almost immediately lead to the potential for a nuclear strike. That would be immediate DEFCON 2. Because Article 5 presumes that NATO is about to fight Russia, ergo, Russia would want to act first to preempt NATO’s actions and do a first strike.
So this is why Article 4 or 5 would likely happen covertly. And I think we’re entering a period of time where they may no longer broadcast exactly what they’re about to do because that negotiating tactic no longer works. Now, I will say something before we get into this, because there’s a lot of continuity of government going on here. Whether people want to admit it or not. One thing is true. Both Trump and Biden are both Americans. And at the end of the day, the enmity that exists between the Republicans and the Democrats is not greater than the one that exists between American leadership and Russian and Chinese and Iranian leadership and North Korean leadership.
That is, those relationships are stronger than Trump and Vladimir Putin and anyone who tries to suggest otherwise. You have no idea what you’re talking about and why. I say this is because you’ll notice that in the last 48 hours since that unofficial announcement was made that the United States is going to be removing restrictions on strikes deep inside Russia so that Ukraine can maintain its foothold inside Russian territory. Since that announcement was made, we have not heard one specific condemnation of this policy change by Trump or by Trump’s national security adviser. People are going to falsely cite statements made by Mike Walsh recently where he, rather ambiguously, in a very roundabout way, kind of sort of didn’t really criticize the move.
He, he just said that things are getting out of control, more or less, and we need to have a plan to deal with this. We need peace. Trump, on the following day came out with a very general generic sort of statement about the Ukraine conflict that we’ve heard before. This is going to lead to World War Three. But there was no specific condemnation of this particular move. This was, and whether people want to admit it or not, there’s high level collusion going on. Continuity of government trumps everything. No pun intended. I believe that the Biden administration is setting Trump up maybe to sabotage him, maybe to crash the whole thing before January 20th.
But if not, the goal is likely to give Trump a bit of leverage because this could have a negative reinforcement effect in that if Trump wants to go to the bargaining table with Vladimir Putin, this is but one more bargaining tool they have. We can remove this. We can, sorry, reimpose these restrictions on Ukraine to stop doing these deep strikes into your territory. Should you agree to maybe bring things back in the Donbass a little bit, maybe give up a little bit of Kirsten. Now, Russia’s never going to agree to this. And so right now, I think a lot of people are being duped by this good cop, bad cop appearance.
But American continuity of government trumps all. Whether you want to believe this or not, Biden and Trump are better buddies than Trump and Putin. Okay, now we are going to, and I know that’s going to a lot of people off, but that’s just the facts. At the end of the day, America first is America First. So like it or not, that is the case. And if you don’t think that these deep state entanglements are not going to extend beyond party lines, we’re talking about the Republicans. Maybe if Trump was an independent, then we’d be talking about something different.
But these things transcend partisan politics. Now, we got a lot of stuff to talk about today. Specifically, I want to bring to Your attention, Article 15 of this revised nuclear doctrine. We’re not going to do the whole thing because it’s going to take too long, but you really have to read this document to understand what it means. And can we please just, before I start this, have a moment of appreciation to realize where we’re at? Every so often, I like to think back, if somebody were to tell me where we would be today, three years ago, would I believe them? Would I believe it was possible? If somebody were to tell me three years ago that Iran just admitted the right hand man to the Ayatollah, that we can have a nuclear weapon in 24 hours.
And they just finished doing the biggest ballistic bombardment of Israel in human history. And the North Koreans were fighting alongside the Russians inside Kursk, where the Ukrainians, backed by NATO, were invading. I mean, just think about all this, right? Somebody’s telling you that your jaw is hitting the floor. And of course, it’s during the pandemic. So you’re like, what the fuck? You know, how is that even possible? But here we are, you still got normalcy bias abound. And every time when we have this oscillation between things ratchet up and then they die down a bit, and then everybody kind of adapts to that new level of escalation, and then they say, oh, not see, nothing bad’s ever going to happen.
And then things ratchet up again and we get even closer. And here we are, we’re like touching the void right now with this. Literally touching the void. Literally. The ball is in the court of NATO at this point in time, possibly even in the Russian, depending on how this plays out. But here we are. And watch. Here we are. In the next few days, it’s going to die down, and everybody’s going to think, oh, see, we told you nothing was going to happen. But we get closer and closer, and then, bam, that’s it. Lights out. Then there’s no more time to prep.
If there’s a guy walking down the street towards you with a gun in his hand, do you take action when you see the gun, or do you wait until he pulls that gun out, he cocks it, and the bullets coming out and fire? Is that when you. You take action? Of course, not all the signs are there. Every single sign. The militarization, the mass militarization in Europe. They’re telling their citizens to prepare, and people are just oblivious NPCs, waiting for it to be spelled out in plain English, which, of course, they can’t. Because if they were to tell you the true nature of the threat, not only would you panic and you’d flip society upside down, but then that would likely accelerate and act as a catalyst for Russia to want to attack us faster.
So we’re in a certain predicament where if NATO was today to say, okay, everybody needs to start stockpiling 30, 60 days worth of food. They need to do it immediately. Russia is going to be like, holy shit, they’re getting ready to attack. And that’s going to ratchet things up. So they have to do it in such a way where it’s kind of candy coated and this Mickey Mouse 72 hour prepping bullshit. There are some countries who are getting real. Usually those are like the Baltic States, but above and beyond that it’s Mickey Mouse preparedness, right? So they can’t do anything that’s going to emphatically disrupt the markets and possibly trigger the war to come faster.
So they have to surreptitiously just slowly massage it in to the psyche of people. And I’m a person who, I’m imperturbed by any of all this stuff that’s going on right now. I don’t even care because I’m as prepared as I’m gonna be. I’ve seen this coming from a mile away. I’m a long term investor in the sense with respect to preparedness. Someday people are day to day oscillating day traders when it comes to preparedness. One day you’re up and you’re going crazy and you’re freaking out and the next day you’re like nothing bad is ever gonna happen.
And then sure enough, we reach a new rung on the escalation ladder. Those people are freaking out, losing their minds again. Don’t be that person. Understand the fundamentals dictate somebody has to win the war. Throughout all of human history, there has to be a winner. There can be an armistice, but that just means that whatever war is coming is going to be much, much worse. Fortunately the Soviet Union dissipated and that was that. And it was decided without firing a shot, more or less. I don’t think we are going to be. We were never in a period like this where there was already a high intensity conflict.
And there were so many insulating factors at that time that actually made it less likely that we were going to go to nuclear war. I mean we had so many nuclear weapons and a lot of them, we had lots of tactical nuclear weapons, but there were so many nuclear weapons that mutually assured destruction was just like a bygone, a foregone conclusion. Nowadays in the non nuclear proliferation age, we’ve actually increased the likelihood of nuclear events because yeah, there’s still enough nukes to destroy the planet, more or less, but not nearly as much as there once was.
So anyways, I’m getting away from the point but I really just hope people appreciate, I know you guys do appreciate the gravity of the situation that we’re currently facing. It is immense. It is growing by the day. Article 15 of the revised Nuclear Doctrine. The key military dangers which may escalate into threats to the Russian Federation and require neutralization through nuclear deterrence include, and I’ll paraphrase, they’re basically saying these are the situations where we may have to use nuclear weapons. Pretty much everything I’m about to tell you is already a condition, a criteria that’s been met.
The potential adversaries, possession number one of nuclear and or other types of weapons of mass destruction that may be used against the Russian Federation and or its allies, as well as the means of delivery of these types of weapons. So if you have an F35, guess what, if you’re party to the conflict, it’s a green light essentially. If you have a launching platform that can deliver nuclear weapons, you are potentially this is grounds for using nuclear weapons. So it extends beyond. And this is why, you know, Anybody that the US gives F35s to is also a country that when the time comes, they’re going to mount nuclear weapons on said F35s, fly them into Russia and this is actually part of their plan.
I actually have their plan right here. Masters of the air, strategic stability and conventional strikes where they detail in depth exactly how they plan to fight a war, a nuclear war with Russia without it even going nuclear. I’ll break that down in the future. But this is a part of NATO’s plan. Now let’s carry on here. The presence b and deployment of potential adversaries of missile defense systems. Just missile defense systems, medium and short range cruise and ballistic missiles, high precision, non nuclear or hypersonic weapons, unmanned strike platforms and directed energy weapons. Pretty much everything under the sun, everything that Poland is surely in possession of and of course Ukraine is in possession of a lot of these items as well.
So already the justification, if you’re in a state of war with a nation and they possess these capabilities, this is potentially grounds for using nuclear weapons. C the buildup of enemy conventional forces near the Russian Federation’s borders or in adjacent maritime areas. We’ve seen this from Finland all the way down, especially in Poland, but all the way down into the Black Sea. Fortunately, because of the strategic ambiguity of the Turks, the Bosphorus Strait has not been fully exploited by NATO for this capacity just yet. D the creation and deployment of space based missile defense systems and anti satellite weapons and strike systems by adversaries.
If you think SpaceX is just so Tony Stark can launch Teslas into outer space and you know, put fart buttons on them and meme about it with Donald Trump, you’re sadly mistaken. I know a lot of people don’t like Neil DeGrasse Tyson, but you need to go and watch his breakdown of why SpaceX is not economically viable. I’m sure they got Starlink. They’re a delivery platform. But a delivery platform for who? They’re contracted by the US government to militarize space. This fantasy land about any investment firms getting behind Elon Musk going to Mars for what? What’s the return on that investment? Sure there could be potential, there could be gold on Mars for all we know.
But they don’t know that. And they, you know, you’re not going to invest in something unless you absolutely know. So it’s all cover for the militarization of space. Vladimir Putin knows it. They like to be diplomatic with Elon because they see it as a potential de escalatory inroad into negotiations. But at the end of the day they realize that this militarization of space is happening and it’s happening under the guise of Tony Stark’s SpaceX. So make no mistake about it, there’s a reason why Elon is so close to the problem. The deployment of nuclear weapons and their delivery means in non nuclear states.
Of course if there was word that NATO was about to arm Ukraine with nuclear weapons, I don’t think that that would ever be able to materialize without us seeing a mushroom cloud. Now Ukraine already has the capability it claims to build. Well not yet. It unofficially claims from non NGO think tank claims that Ukraine can make a nuclear weapon using its spent uranium within a matter of a few months. And of course they do have the deployment systems. They can make dirty bombs. But we’re talking about the empowerment of these states with nuclear weapons by NATO countries.
There’s a very high likelihood that we could see Poland having nuclear weapons soon because Finland and a lot of these Baltic states are in possession of these advanced stealth fighter craft that can carry nuclear weapons. They are essentially, they would fall up under this as well. Actions isolating parts of the Russian Federation’s territory such as blocking critical transport links. We might consider the Crimean Bridge who everybody seemed to have forgotten about now that they have the green light to utilize atacms. Although I think they’ve already tried to attack the Crimean Bridge. It’s heavily defended with electronic warfare capabilities, S3 hundreds, four hundred.
All of Russia’s most advanced air defense equipment. But something like that would be another red line. Remember none of this was codified, none of this was ratified into law. The Russians are incredibly jurisprudent. So now they’ve basically given themselves with everything. I’m telling you here, this is essentially what’s been the case for the last since the war began. Right. So now they’re just saying, well, if we want, we can use nukes whenever we decide. And it’s in line with our own doctrine. Right, because they’re, you know, say what you will about the Russians, but they are judicious.
They like to cross their T’s and dot their I’s. And I think this was Putin’s last opportunity to the west to say, hey, you know, we made this nuclear doctrine. We warned you, you kind of backed off a little bit. And then now we didn’t sign it at that time because we wanted to save that one final step in the hopes that we wouldn’t have to do this. But you left us no choice. Actions by the potential adversary aimed at striking, destroying, terminating environmentally hazardous facilities in the Russian Federation. Of course, they’re referring to specifically the Kursk nuclear power plant here, which could lead to technological, ecological or social disasters.
So with those ATACMs, which I should add, have been heavily active over the last 48 hours. We showed you some footage last night, contrary to what is being circulated on the Internet. No, that is not old footage. It is, however, a place that was targeted in the past. That very ammunition depot was already targeted successfully and it was targeted again. And the footage I showed you yesterday is 100% new. Anyways, today it’s happened again. There was another salvo of drones and ATACMS missiles that were fired into Russian territory. I have video to show you guys if we ever get through this.
Actions by the potential adversary aimed at striking, destroying environmental hazard. We already talked about that one. Large scale military exercises by adversaries near the Russian Federation’s borders. Again, steadfast defender and aspects thereof have been ongoing basically for the last year and a half. Okay, so, you know, this is all up Russia’s border from the Arctic all the way down to the Black Sea. Uncontrolled proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, their means of delivery technologies, and the equipment for their production. That is just a handful of the items that are listed as conditions that would meet the criteria to justify using nuclear weapons.
For Russia from this point forward, this was not the case before. Vladimir Putin signed this today. So understand where we are. We’re in a much different place than we once were. The amount of detail in this document surprised a lot of people. Okay, now today, and this goes back to signaling today, this could just be normal stuff. This could just be everyday military activity. But it caught the attention of some of the OSINT crowd and it was that, I think A total of 8 Russian Ministry of Defense planes were heading east. I’m not sure where they were heading east.
In the east is where, of course, Russia has a lot of its deep underground military bunkers. And it’s signaling like this that we’re entering an age of signals because again, we are, I think, past the point where we’re going to continue to be telegraphing what we’re going to do next. I think we’re in a new stage of escalation now where we’re not going to be announcing what we’re doing officially. And this is very evident with the Biden administration. Now, with the exception of. Let me see if I have the actual story here. There was one official source, a guy who worked with the US State Department, who did in fact confirm that the US did in fact remove restrictions on Ukraine.
I got so many darn windows open here, it’s probably going to be the last one I picked. No, I can’t seem to find it. Anyways, a member of the State Department did confirm that this was in fact the case. Oh, here he is right at the end, this guy here, Assistant Secretary of State Brian Nichols, who confirmed the reports toward Brazilian news outlet O Global that the decision aimed at pressuring Moscow into peace talks was to confirm authorization for Ukraine to use long range missiles against Russia. Now I don’t think we’re going to ever get official confirmation anymore because from here on in, as we’re on the precipice of a nuclear exchange, it makes no sense for NATO to utilize that bargaining tactic, that telegraphing bargaining tactic.
And it makes no sense for Russia to do it anymore either where they’re signaling. But they are going to do this subterfuge, this type of signaling to the United States. And if you don’t know what I mean by this, there’s a video I released probably about a year ago where I talked about Project Ryan. It was a project by the Russians in the 80s where they were trying to assess what were some of the telltale signs that the United States was getting ready to do a nuclear strike. And there were, you know, a hundred or so of these signs that they identified.
Even more than that, I think I Talked about the 50 main ones in that video. You should go watch it. It’s very good. It’s basically what would happen before a nuclear war. What are some of the signs you would see? Would you see the White House full of cars or would the parking lot be empty? That sort of thing. Because they had to look for these sorts of things because they knew it would not be broadcast. Okay, so now we’re entering a phase where these signals are going to be sent, where if you’re not paying attention to it, unless you’re in the OSINT realm, you’re not paying attention to these things.
Right. So the average person, it’s not going to incite panic, but it’s going to be a way for both sides to talk to each other because they’re no longer going to be talking through the mouthpieces of mainstream media. There is no reason why we had to broadcast any of the military equipment that we sent into Ukraine. Sure, the Russians might find out one day that ATACMS or Jason’s missile fell on them. You know, so what, is it better to beg for forgiveness? You know, you can make that argument now. We’re, I think we’re going to enter a period of radio silence because now everything that we do officially is going to.
We need that ambiguity now. Okay. We need plausible deniability at this point in time because Russia’s new nuclear doctrine is so specific. So when you have all of these Ministry of Defense planes in Russia flying to the east, who knows where? Maybe this was just an exercise. Very well. Could be these are going to now be how Russia and NATO communicate, even post Trump, because again, Trump, Biden, continuity of government trumps everything. Okay, all right. So getting into the nitty gritty Russian media, of course, is reiterating. I’m not sure if this is new, but basically, you know, this is Wednesday night in Russia talking about how they’re going to nuke all the countries in Europe.
But now, of course, it hits different with this new revelation of the, the revised nuclear doctrine. And at any point they could make the determination that now’s the time. So, of course the Russians are prepared for it. Of course, I showed you. I think it was. Is it about a month and a half ago where I shared a utility bill that a person from Russia sent me. And on the back of it were nuclear instructions on how to survive, like a nuclear event. And this is something they hadn’t seen anymore. Nevermind the countless amounts of unprecedented exercises, nuclear exercises, literal Mad Max nuclear war exercises that have been happening in Russia.
And I’m not talking about the annual ones. I’m talking about the ones that were relatively new. This is an attack that happened today inside the Russian. Inside Russia, near the borders. I’m not sure if it was Bryansk, but another deep strike utilizing, presumably a drone. But it could have been basically a part of a larger volley of ATACMs and drones. Ukraine is saying that they’re going to be able to produce 3,000 of their own homegrown Neptune missiles that I believe they’re originally an anti ship missile and then they started repurposing them for, you know, land to land, you know, like a land based missile for any other target, maybe even surface to air.
But so now they’re going to be using that in conjunction with the 50,000 unmanned aerial vehicles that they’re going to be producing that of course have this effect. And the Germans are also sending 4,000 UAVs as well. So the drone war is going to continue. Ukraine however, is getting hit as well. This is what Russia did in the Sumy region today. They put several bombers up in the air and they did a massive strike once again on the numerous places throughout Ukraine that are now. Much of it is in the dark intermittently. There’s rolling blackouts in numerous places.
EU must prepare for sending troops to Ukraine. All 12 troops from Estonia are about to be sent to Ukraine. You know, the dogs that bark loudest that whole thing. Right. Bloc members should be ready if any Moscow Kiev peace deal is brokered by the us. So peace means war, I guess, because if you’re going to put NATO troops inside Ukraine, I think that’s a non starter unless you put them to the left of the Dnieper river, not the geographical left, but to the actual literal western left of Dnieper River. Maybe that’s how this thing’s going to be resolved along the river.
I mean in a sensible world that really would be the best solution to prevent nuclear Armageddon, have a temporary armistice in the very least so we can rearm and do this all in 10 years. But at least it’s 10 years down the road. I don’t think this is going to be successful because now you have the conflict in Ukraine intrinsically, geez, it’s the word I’m looking for. Inextricably LinkedIn to what’s going on in Iran and North Korea. They’re all inextricably linked together. So if the war in Iran ratchets up, even if there is an armistice in Ukraine and Russia, Russia is going to get involved and that’s going to cause the Ukraine war to flare up once again.
So everything’s connected. The Russians are currently building these mobile bunkers. These are mobile nuclear proof bunkers. I don’t know if they’re. They got lead surrounding them because you do need three feet of earth or I believe it’s a couple feet of concrete. You can see here they look like shipping containers that are outfitted with thicker walls. I don’t think this is going to be enough wall to protect you from gamma radiation unless there’s some lead in there or something. They’re certainly built to be obviously bomb proof to a certain degree and maybe blast resistant. The fact that Russia is creating things like this should be a concern to people here in the West.
But hey, Bitcoin’s at all time highs and micro strategies. Not a bubble at all. Interesting how they have these support trusses on the sides. You know, you would think that that would be. I guess it makes sense. I guess it might make sense. I’d have to look more into the architecture of this. But I’m gonna have to send this to the container guy Channing over there and see exactly what he has to say about this. It looks, actually now that I’m looking at, those look like concrete blocks that are added to the outside. Huh. Interesting. So you can see these massive concrete blocks outside the shipping.
So all it is this one anyways is a reinforced shipping container with concrete on the outside. Huh. An above ground nuclear bunker. Very interesting, Very interesting. Okay, well, Mark Root, and this confirms my hypothesis of that they’re about to go radio silent. Okay. Mark Root, the new NATO chief. I don’t, not sure if I’m pronouncing his name right, but he basically said today in this message that they are now they see no reason. I’ll just skip to the part here I’m not going into whether individual allies should yes or no or what they are doing, obviously in reference to allowing Ukraine to do deep strikes in Russian territory if they want to do so.
I would generally say let’s not communicate too much and not make our adversaries more wise than is necessary. So he’s saying it right there. This is the NATO chief saying we should not tell Russia anymore what we’re going to do. And you know, duh, you would think that would be the case since the beginning, but they were using it as a negotiating tactic. And that is the, the epiphany that I had today is that, you know, it makes perfect sense, you know that, but nobody really seen it, or at least maybe they did. Wasn’t common knowledge anyways.
Lavrov has now once again. And look, you might not like the Russians, you should never not like a nation of people, but you may not like the Russian leadership. I will say that Lavrov seems to be a straight shooter. Everything he says happens. And here’s what Lavrov has to say. The west wants escalation of the conflict. Kiev couldn’t have struck Russia with ATACMS missiles without Washington’s participation. So it’s US troops who are helping with the targeting or NATO troops who are helping with the targeting of and using the ATACMS to do these deep strikes inside Russia.
The west appears to be working towards and notice how he carefully words things, never says anything definitively. The west appears to be working because he’s a diplomat, right. Appears to be working towards escalating the Ukraine conflict. Lavrov has said following reports that the attack missiles used blah, blah, blah. Lavrov admitted that he had no way to confirm whether the media reports regarding Biden’s permission granted to Kiev were true. Again trying to maintain the niceties of diplomacy, however, he suggested that ATACMS strikes on Bryansky were a clear sign that they want escalation. I’ve thought that for the longest time Lavrov has simply given up and he’s been kind of fatalistic about this, but he still, he still shows up and tries to put his best diplomatic foot forward.
Nonetheless, it appears as though he’s a bit more jaded nowadays. The minister noted that it is impossible to use technologically complex attacks launchers without the help of the US and recalled Russian President Vladimir Putin’s warning that Moscow would be forced to change its position if Ukraine received permission to use Western long range weapons inside Russian territory. Lavrov stressed that Moscow perceives the launch of long range missiles controlled by the US as a qualitatively new phase of the war. With the part of the rest I forgot. Marc Root said one of the justifications for allowing long range was the North Korean presence, which doesn’t really make a whole lot of sense.
The only way that makes sense is if the North Koreans are in fact propping up the Russians to a degree that is significant enough to postpone the attritional collapse of the Russian economy and the Russian military. Because so long as Putin can exploit Korean manpower, he doesn’t have to call another military draft. He maintains a relatively high popularity amongst his people, although his back is up against the corner. So they’re perhaps saying that now they have to ratchet things up because this North Korea thing wasn’t something maybe they factored into the equation. I don’t see how.
But again, these are Western leaders, so they’ve, they’ve had it too nice for too long and so they forgot how to think long term. They don’t know how to play chess anymore. I hope that they in the west will read this doctrine and not the way they read the UN Charter, okay? Seeing only what they need, obviously in reference to the Gaza Strip. But the doctrine in its entirety and its interconnectedness basically signaling that the conditions for Russia to utilize these nukes is already there, if they so choose to use it. Zelensky has of course welcome this idea of using weapons inside Russia and has encouraged other NATO countries to join in on the fun.
Vladimir Putin confirming these are the allegedly a video of the first ever ATACMS launching into Russia today. That cannot be 100% confirmed. Here we have Keir Starmer. This one is kind of scary, I gotta admit. Again, I don’t. I’m pretty stoic when it comes to this stuff because I’m as prepared as I’m gonna be. I mean, I could always be more prepared, I could always have more skills. I can have a bigger network. But I mean, people are like, oh, you’re freaking out every day. I’m not freaking out. You’re freaking out. Why the hell do I have to freak out, man? I got 10 years worth of food and enough ammi.
I got more ammunition than freaking Estonia, okay? Maybe even more guns. All right, let’s hear what Keir Starmer has to say. Russia is the aggressor. Game changer in principle. The reason that I’m not going to comment is I think, well understood, understood, which is Putin is the winner if we do so and it will undermine Ukraine. And I’m not. So now they’re no longer talking about it again, confirming my hypothesis that there now is going to be radio silence about the weapons sent. And that is very dangerous. Just quickly. Russia’s also threatened nuclear escalation. Are you comfortable with that when people at home are watching this, worrying that you could put us at risk? Well, it’s very important.
It’s very important that we’re steadfast in our support for. I’m actually quite impressed that the media, Sky News, which is kind of like fringe UK media, they’re kind of more of a right leaning media, I suppose. I’m surprised though that they’re challenging him on this because this is not typical for UK media. Ukraine, Russia is the aggressor. Russia, Russia. Even if it unleashes, unleashes nuclear war and notice how he continuously deflects, has to be the one that makes the move to stop this war. It’s within their gift. But we must support Ukraine. It’s impacting, not just Ukraine, it’s impacting the rest of the world, including the uk.
It’s your message to viewers back home that there will not be a nuclear war because that is what Russia is threatening. So she’s trying to say, like, hey, Russia just signed a new nuclear doctrine. It is there for everyone to see. They’ve been doing tactical nuclear drills on the border. Their missiles are on rolling combat duty. They’re currently on a high estate of nuclear readiness. There’s no ambassador inside the United States. Are you sure that you’re sure? He just says, all right, we’ll take his word for it this time. Again. Oh, what’s going on here? This is Radislaw Sikorsky.
I’m not sure if I pronounce his name, but he’s cheerleading this on too because of course Poland wants to be the biggest, baddest military in the eu. I hope they realize that the United States isn’t giving them all those weapons for nothing. Eventually they’re going to be asked to do something with those weapons. Yeah, that’s what’s going down. Operation Deutschland. Germany is preparing up plans for World War Three. Deutschland. Deutschland. I got to work on my German accent. That’s going to be. My next character is a German character. Okay, so Germany has a plan to mobilize for war.
I really think what this is, is, I mean these numbers are paltry even if you look at World War II. Germany had, you know, 7 million troops. I think at peak they’re talking about 800,000 troops, 200,000 NATO vehicles enlisting truck drivers from the east preparing stockpiles for shortages. So strategic reserves, military protection for key buildings, building out their civil defense infrastructure. This is really for the purpose of how to manage the population post SHTF after the radioactive dust clouds settle, understand that NATO thinks they can win a nuclear war. And every ATACMS missile that flies inside Russia is a probing operation.
It’s creating a virtual map of Russian air defense that could potentially someday be used for that strike, that first strike and who knows what. I don’t know why SpaceX comes to mind for some reason, but I have a feeling that that is going to be integral to the plan. Okay, Germany’s World War three preparations. We’ve talked about this months ago, but it’s broached the mainstream once again. A 1000 page secret document, Operation Deutschland outlines Germany’s plans for national defense in the event of a large scale war. I talked to you yesterday about the candy coated Mickey Mouse preparedness that other countries are currently getting their populations primed for.
Went in depth about that yesterday. I was going to talk about this yesterday, but I just went off on 50,000 different word salad tangents as I typically do. Guilty as charged. Don’t give a fuck at this point. Increased tensions, growing concerns over Russia’s war in Ukraine and the involvement of countries like North Korea have heightened fears of global conflict. We’re just figuring this out now? These are things you do before you blow up the pipeline. First you mobilize for war, then you blow up the pipeline. You don’t do it when the price of gas is through the roof.
Germany, come on. Emergency plans are focused on protecting key infrastructure and preparing for potential military threats. Civil defense measures. German companies, including those in the Hamburg Chamber of Commerce are advised to prepare for self sufficiency, such as installing diesel generators and wind turbines. And of course, everybody should expect to have their shit expropriated by the government when the time comes. If you haven’t seen my videos about martial law and World War 3, they’re going to come for everybody’s shit. So just, you know, make sure you have a little boating accident or two beforehand and have a few caches kicking around, okay? Transportation concerns.
Officials raise concerns about the dependence on Eastern European drivers and how war could disrupt logistics. Those Tesla semis could not come fast enough. They need to build these Schengen Corridors which are specifically designed to move large amounts of military equipment across mainland Europe when the shit hits the fan. But again, all of this presumes that it’s going to be a conventional war. I don’t see in what reality they’re going to keep this at the conventional level. Russia doesn’t have the manpower to fight a conventional war. Apparently with 800,000 troops, neither does Germany. That probably is a sizable enough force to police whatever remains of the mutated population that didn’t catch a million degree suntan after the shit hits the fan.
NATO readiness plans include moving NATO troops and hundreds of thousands of vehicles across Germany if a conflict escalates. Again, Nordic countries, all countries are getting flashlights on batteries. And they are prepared, man. They are prepared. Trump confirms plan to use military for deportations. This is going to be entangled with the foreign policy stuff. Yeah, you’re going to see some domestic terrorism in the dragnet of gang members and Ms. 13, 19, whatever the hell it is. You’re going to see a lot of Chinese nationals get caught up in that because of course, remember all of those Chinese folk coming across the border.
I’m sure they’re going to do. There’s going to be some sort of modern day McCarthyist witch hunt for you know, Russian colluders and Iranians and you know, there’s going to be a lot of people that get sweeped up in this and it’s going to get ugly and it’s going to probably result in some type of martial law, some type of martial law that could very well cause a great domestic disturbance that could potentially put the United States at a disadvantage, but could be the very thing that is required to turn the United States into a remilitarize the United States.
Why did the movie the Running man just come to mind? I just feel that that’s where we’re heading. The Running Man. I feel that that’s where somewhere in between, you know, the Running Man. Children of Men. That’s going to be 2025. Go watch the movie Children of Men. That’s what you’re going to see in 2025. And it’s going to lead to total chaos. And I assume that our adversaries are going to attempt to exploit the discontent that arises. When you have military guys in fatigues, I don’t know if they’re going to put them in fatigues or not.
Scooping people off the street, whether or not they’re illegal criminals or not, it’s going to create all kinds of problems. But what they’re going to do is they’re going to say, you know, these Iranians or someone else is going to, you know, they’re going to try to tie this to the wars that are currently going on somehow. Just watch. Okay, we already talked about those. Oh, Jim Camer, save the day, Jimmy. He says nuclear war is coming. I think he, obviously he’s in on the running joke that he’s always wrong. And I actually don’t know if this is.
Somebody probably just made this up. This is probably the result of the Internet. Anytime Jim Cramer tweets about something, the next day it plummets. Right? So the hope is that if he’s saying that nuclear war is coming, maybe it’s not going to happen. Maybe this is the one time he’s going to be right. Unfortunately, like I said, Ukraine, this is just a statement by Zelensky that they’re going to be building 30,000 long range Kamikaze UAVs and 3,000 cruise missiles. Neptune cruise missiles. Wall street meh. Shake it off. Pump the markets up one more time. Maybe this means the Fed will print more money.
World War Three couldn’t come sooner. So we can get back to QE Poly market up 4% today. Will a nuclear weapon detonate in 2024? A 16% chance, up 4% in a day. That’s crazy. That is crazy. That means people are actually betting real money. There’s a 16% chance. That’s a. You know, can you imagine taking a plane ride? And there’s a 16% chance it crashes. This is a commenter, a subscriber to the channel, and I’m not throwing shade on this individual. Don’t get mad or trash talk this person in the comments. I just wanted to use this as an example, okay.
Because I should have probably blacked out the name, but I mean, it’s a public forum, so, you know, if you use it, then be prepared to lose it. They say, oh, no, we’re all going to die. Nobody has all this stuff in reference to me talking about preps. Nobody needs all of this. Yeah, you’re just going to go out and survive in the wilderness and you’re going to flint nap and make arrows out of rocks and do all that shit. Nope, you’re gonna die. My parents and my grandparents and great grandparents survived countless wars, including World War I, World War II and civil wars without any of this.
So great grandparents, I presume this person is definitely Gen X and beyond. Must be if they’re talking about civil wars. Maybe even more than that. Maybe the. Couldn’t be the silent generation. Or is that. Are they still around? Anyways, baby boomers, obviously. And I just basically tell them, look, you ain’t your grandparents, so you better get to work. And your grandparents probably were preppers. They just didn’t call it prepping at the time. They probably had pantries and jars full of stuff and they knew how to hunt, they knew how to grow their own food. They probably had a horse that ran on grass and they could do all these things.
You are not your grandparents. You won’t rise to the occasion. You’re going to go out and you’re going to die, which is why you need to prepare. Okay? Or don’t. John Thune reiterated unrelenting support for Israel. So, yep, they’re going to go to war with Israel. There’s no doubt about that. In fact, Iran today threatened that if it may consider a nuclear response if the International Atomic Energy Agency issues a statement against it. By that, they don’t mean they’re going to immediately nuke anybody. They just mean that they’re going to maybe start enriching more uranium openly.
But nonetheless, they spilled the beans yesterday and they said, hey, we can have a nuke in 24 hours. Which is essentially admitting that you already have nuclear weapons. Or all of the ingredients to build one, because there’s no way you can do that in 24 hours if you don’t already have all the components tried and tested. There was a Danish navy ship that boarded a Chinese bulk carrier and they consider them the main suspect in a cutting of a cable. Now, was this an accident? Probably. It usually is. They’re dragging an anchor and the anchor, you know, rips across the cable because there’s so many of these undersea cables.
I don’t know what the rules and regulations are traversing the Baltic Sea, but Europe is really, really trying to drive China out. The display by Keir Starmer and Xi Jinping and, and Baerbock from Germany and the, the, the lack of any deference towards the Chinese and their capabilities is just, it’s, it’s really staggering how we are underestimating the Chinese. Could you imagine, just imagine the army that China is going to build in the next 10 years quietly. You know, all these numbers were basing. They got 400 nukes. Yeah, maybe 10 years ago. Once these guys start mass producing anything, it’s game over.
Even if it is a copy of a copy of a copy, and even if, you know, what is that Stalin quote? Quantity is quality of its own. I gotta go, guys. If you want to support the channel man. Canadianpreparedness.com or leave a trolling remark or a supportive remark, it all helps out. Thanks for watching. Take care.
[tr:tra].
See more of Canadian Prepper on their Public Channel and the MPN Canadian Prepper channel.
Author
