ALERT: NATO PLACES NUCLEAR WEAPONS ON STANDBY EMERGENCY MEETING OVER ANOTHER NUKE SUB NEAR UK

Categories
Posted in: Canadian Prepper, News, Patriots
SPREAD THE WORD

BA WORRIED ABOUT 5G FB BANNER 728X90


Summary

➡ NATO is preparing its nuclear weapons due to increasing threats from Russia and China, according to Jan Stoltenberg. He suggests that showing NATO’s nuclear arsenal to the world is a way to send a message to its enemies. This news comes amid talks of deploying more nuclear weapons and a growing belief among Russians that World War III is inevitable. The situation could potentially impact the United States and the global economy, and people are advised to prepare for possible conflict.
➡ The article discusses the escalating tensions between NATO, Russia, and China, suggesting that the world is becoming more bipolar. It highlights the secrecy around the number of operational nuclear weapons, with estimates suggesting the UK and US have a significant number. The article also mentions the potential for a preemptive nuclear strike and the devaluation of human life in times of war. It advises people to prepare for potential conflict by moving away from densely populated areas and storing essential supplies.
➡ The article discusses the presence of Russian submarines in the Atlantic Ocean, which could explain the increased military activity by the US Navy and Coast Guard. The submarines’ main task is to counter American aircraft carrier strike groups, potentially using nuclear weapons. The author also promotes their website, canadianpreparedness.com, where they sell survival gear and will soon release videos on preparedness for different financial situations. Lastly, the author encourages readers to continue preparing for potential crises, emphasizing the importance of survival for the sake of future generations.

Transcript

Breaking news this is your world War three update. Took a break from the homestead to come into the studio today to give you this information. Now, contrary to popular belief, no, I did not quit YouTube. I did, however, quit the city. That much is 110% true, which is why I got to make this really quick. But this is important. NATO is putting nuclear weapons on standby. Jan Stoltenberg insists that the bloc must show its nuclear arsenal to the world and has now given a stark warning about the threat from China. This is mainstream adjacent news from the Telegraph NATO is currently in talks to deploy more nuclear weapons in the face of a growing threat from Russia and China.

Jan Stoltenberg had said. Now remember just yesterday I showed you images of f 35s currently being stored in norwegian mountain bunkers. The only reason why you practice this strategic dispersal concept is if you’re preparing for nuclear war. I cannot enumerate all of the data points today that suggest that we are on the precipice of a major conflict between NATO and Russia because time is tight and quite frankly, if you need me to do that every single day, something is missing. I think 99% of you are with me in that we dont have much time left. Now what about this is suspicious? Jan Stoltenberg added that the block must show its nuclear arsenal to the world to send a direct message to its foes.

In the interview with the Telegraph, he revealed that there were live consultations between members on taking missiles out of storage and placing them on standby. This essentially would be a run up the Defcon ladder, which is typically not something that you would disclose to the public, or if you did it, you would do it in such a roundabout way so to not trigger panic. This doesn’t, however, account for the fact that 60% of Russians now believe that World War III is inevitable, and they only believe that Ukraine. Only one in ten of those people believe that Ukraine is the actual legitimate threat.

Seven out of ten actually believe that the United States is a threat. So if you are one of the people sitting here cozy in the west, separated by two massive oceans, thinking this ain’t going to affect us, think again. This very obviously is going to entail the United States getting involved in some capacity, even if it only amounts to a complete cessation of the flow of goods across the great oceans, which of course will completely collapse our economy and make life miserable for everybody around the world, Mister Stoltenberg said, I won’t go into operational details about how many nuclear warheads should be operational, which should be stored, but we need to consult on these issues.

That’s exactly what they’re doing. Again, nuclear deployment and readiness typically is something that is kept classified. So the fact that they are openly talking about it indeed means that it’s a bit of a flex, it’s a bit of a telegraph, or as they call it, deterrence to the Russians. Now, both sides appear to be doing this. Just today, there was a russian nuclear submarine spawned off the coast of the UK, now still in international waters. However, this, of course, is interesting, as it coincides with a nuclear powered submarine that some former CIA analysts like Ray McGovern, believe is actually carrying nuclear weapons, in spite of the fact that a lot of analysts are saying, no, this is just a nuclear powered submarine.

So you have all of this going on and a lot more. Meanwhile, we know that the peace initiative, if you could even call it that, really, it was a war initiative. That thing that went down in Switzerland recently, that was basically just getting everybody onto a war footing. It was the complete opposite. Whatever they say is the complete opposite. But it’s interesting that they are telegraphing this, even though before they did this, we already knew that the nuclear forces were ramping up. They already have the f 35s dispersed, the deployment systems dispersed. We already have the new and improved b 61 tactical nuclear weapons delivered by the United states.

We already know that all of these assets, including nuclear bombers, the new stealth bomber, have been deployed, are on full deployment. And we’re also seeing numerous other forward deployed weapons systems, missile defense systems on both sides, signaling that at any time, at any moment, this whole thing could go off. Of course, Alexander Vusik, as we talked about a few weeks ago, has predicted that this thing is going to pop within three months, possibly before that time. What I would encourage people to do right now is act as though you know shit is going to hit the fan in three months and live your life accordingly.

This doesn’t mean panic. This doesn’t mean hasty decisions. This just means if you knew that something bad was coming and you were quite certain that it was coming, live your life to the fullest, get in the best possible physical condition that you can, stockpile as much stuff as is economically sustainable for you to do so again, don’t make any sort of hasty, impulsive financial decisions. But right now, the writing is on the wall. And that is why I moved out of the city, because I know it’s coming. So in a wide ranging interview at the NATO headquarters in Brussels, he said, I won’t go into operational details about how many warheads should be operational and which should be stored.

But we need to consult on these issues. He gave a stark warning about the threat from China. He also said expected a labor government to be a staunch NATO ally and defended plans to Trump proof weapons deliveries to Ukraine. Now, on the topic of whether or not Trump is going to continue in its support of NATO, that is a done deal. The die is already cast on this world war three thing. It is coming, no matter who, which president gets into power. One of the ultimatums that Trump gave NATO was that they need to start exceeding the contributions of the 2% military expenditure threshold in order for the United States to remain involved as actively as it has been in to NATO.

All the intermarium states, the former Warsaw Pact countries, those who are right on the front line of this thing, have in fact exceeded greatly their commitments. So America is committed to supporting those. And I don’t think there are too many now who are still not meeting their expectations for a proportion of their GDP to spend on weaponry. And if they haven’t, they’re insignificant in terms of militarily anyways, in terms of NATO. A decade ago, when the. Sorry, let me go on here. Mister Stoltenberg said nuclear transparency should be the cornerstone of NATO’s nuclear strategy to prepare the alliance for what he described as a more dangerous world.

So they’re trying to bring up China here? Well, of course, NATO, the NATO alliance is primarily geared towards Russia. It’s basically to defend their eastern flank, which the only eastern flank they have is Russia. So he’s trying to bring up China as if this has anything to do with China. I mean, it does ultimately, because, yes, many believe that China and the Russians, who are in fact training together in trench warfare and other various methods, are going to conduct and synchronize big arrow attacks at the same time. And North Korea might join in on that as well, as well as Hezbollah and Israel.

So indeed, they’re definitely trying to make it out as if this is for a distant threat and not for something which could potentially happen any day now. We know Zelensky confirmed today that f 16 deliveries are imminent. A decade ago, when the 65 year old assumed his role at the top of the block, nuclear exercises were conducted in complete secrecy. Okay, so now they’re not doing that anymore. Now he openly praises a number of the 32 allies for contributing to the deterrent, including most recently the Netherlands, for investing in dual capable fighter jets that can host nuclear weapons.

If you are in possession of a deployment system, if your country is in possession of a deployment system, whether or not you have nuclear weapons at that time, you will be a target. There is a sarmat missile for everybody involved, for every one of the 32 states. Transparency helps us communicate the direct message that we of course, are a nuclear alliance, Mister Stoltenberg said NATO’s aim is of course a world without nuclear weapons. But as long as nuclear weapons exist, we will remain a nuclear alliance. Because a world where Russia, China and North Korea have nuclear weapons and NATO does not is a very dangerous world.

And that means in a not so very distant future, NATO may face something that it has never faced before. Now remember, they’re never going to tell you the exact timeline when they say things like 20 years out, ten years out. They are just softening and massaging people’s minds to accept what’s likely coming a lot sooner. Mister Stoltenberg’s warnings came after the g seven sharply criticized China and Russia in a communique last week that called on Beijing. You see how China has just suddenly become the enemy all of a sudden. I mean, two years ago when this conflict emerged, there was a debate as to whether or not Russia and China were at all strategically aligned.

And now they’ve completely made that association completely entangled so that to attack one is to attack another. And of course they’re starting to line it up so that if and when something does flare up in the Taiwan Strait, they are going to approach it from the perspective of Axis versus allies and delineate it along eastern and western lines. Not this multipolar world. That really is a deception. And I don’t know who started that terminology, but the more I think about it, it really isn’t a multipolar world. It still will be a bipolar world. And yes, you might argue that China and Russia at some point will have to sort out any sort of competitiveness that might emerge as a result of both of them being neighboring superpowers.

But for the time being, it’s a bipolar world, okay? And it’s always going to be that because you’re always going to ally against your primary enemy until that enemy is defeated. Then if there’s anybody left at that period of time, then Russia and China might go to war in 100 years. The number of operational nuclear weapons is top secret, but estimates suggest that UK has about 40 of 225 deployed at any one time. The US has about 1700 of 3700. These numbers are virtually meaningless when you really think about it. These are virtually meaningless numbers, especially when the Chinese don’t disclose.

So any sort of estimates about how many nuclear weapons are on standby or could be made ready very quickly is, I think that’s just fodder for public consumption because at the end of the day it comes down to continuity of government and this is classified information. Just like Defcon France, NATO’s third nuclear power does not make its atomic arsenal available to the alliance because of a long held decision to maintain independence over its own deterrence. So in that respect, this is why many people have suspected that France has been chosen to spearhead with this whole we’re going to deploy troops thing because of course, it takes the responsibility away from NATO in a nuclear sense and puts it square on France, minimizing the risk of a catastrophic flare up, of a full blown, mutually assured destruction type of nuclear war.

So this goes on and on, and this article is rather extensive. So it’s clear as day that NATO is preparing nuclear weapons. Many suspect on the other side that this is actually in preparation for a nuclear strike, a preemptive nuclear strike. We need to remember who we’re dealing with here. Even if you do cheerlead and champion the israeli cause, even if you do champion the ukrainian cause, or even if you’re the one in 1000 people who thought the Iraq war was a good idea, no matter which one of these wars, you have to admit that the value on human life on that side of the equation is not something that is at a high premium in the minds of our leaders.

Okay? Now the common theme that I hear discussed is that, well, the Russians and the chinese, authoritarian societies, they’re the ones that devalue human life. And they’re fine with these human wave tactics where thousands of guys die and just throw as many people as possible into the meat grinder. But we have been desensitized over here as well. So do not be surprised if we are the ones, if we are just as prone to making that a hasty and very consequential decision that is going to condemn us all to a future in a radiological hellscape that nobody is going to be able to escape.

The best way you can prepare for it, of course, is to remove yourself as far as possible from the densely populated urban areas and try to have those self sustaining systems in place, but more importantly, store energy, energy in the form of food, fuel, different types of equipment, tools. These are all things you have to do. Which is why we’re going back to basics. In the next week we’re going to be training some new people. So we’re going to be doing some lighter content for people who are just getting new to just getting acquainted with this preparedness space.

And oftentimes I hear, you know, the criticism of, I can never afford this or I can never be that prepared in the state that I am now. And indeed, if you’re entering at this stage of the game, you’re going to be limited in terms of what you probably can accomplish if you’re a person of less than modest means. That’s not to say that you can’t improve your situation, but what you don’t want to do is prepare your situation to somebody who’s been preparing for 15 years. I mean, it’s like going into a gym when you’ve spent your entire life not taking care of yourself and thinking that you’re going to be a high level fitness athlete with a top tier physique within a few days, and getting frustrated and demoralized because you can’t achieve that, be better than you were yesterday, that is the best that you can do.

Other data points of escalation today, Poland has called for Russia’s dismemberment. You had another leader. I can’t remember which one. It was. The dutch leader. The fact that Putin came out with this bullshit peace proposal, this is a direct quote. He swore yesterday, is a sign that he is panicking. This is good news. Well, I think Putin is panicking because he doesn’t want the world to go to the brink of nuclear Armageddon. I mean, I think that’s why. I think if he wanted to, he could just throw more people into the meat grinder and continue in a conventional war with NATO.

But he knows that the stakes are going to be elevated much higher, which is why Russia has moved s 500 systems into the crimean region. And you only use these? Well, not only they have extended radars that can see deeper into countries like Poland and Romania, but the primary use for this system is against satellites and intercontinental ballistic missiles. So the fact that they’re being deployed that close to the front means that this thing could get very hot, in a nuclear sense, very soon. Malonia or Maloney, I should say, has called for Russia’s surrender. Now, there’s some disagreement in terms of the translation of her statements.

Some people say it wasn’t as hawkish and aggressive as that quotation indicates that calling for Russia’s surrender. Some people say it was something more along the lines of, we refuse to negotiate with Vladimir Putin or something like that. But either way, all things point towards imminent escalation and clash between NATO and Russia. The russian nuclear submarine that was spotted off the UK coast did spark an emergency meeting. Amid defense fears, the nuclear powered attack submarine Kazan was detected by the Royal Air Force as it sailed just off UK’s coast. So that’s going on. According to the Stockholm International Peace and Research Institute, nuclear proliferation is increasing.

We continue to see year on year increases in the number of operational warheads. So maybe not necessarily the amount of warheads, but the operational ones. Of the estimated 12,000 warheads recorded worldwide, around 9500 were a part of military stockpiles for potential use. Around 3900 of these warheads were mounted on missiles and aircraft, 60 more than in the same month a year earlier, according to the report. And I wouldn’t even take that as necessarily for one. We really don’t know how many are actually deployed, especially in Russia, seeing as there’s no longer any sort of strategic treaties.

But many of these things can be put together rather quickly. So it really doesn’t matter how many are deployed right now. It does to an extent, because of course, it does take time to get these things ready. And if you’re talking about imminent nuclear conflict, then of course minutes count. But that a lot of these things are being stored in places that nuclear weapons might not be able to touch. That is even more problematic. Okay. For reasons that I’m not even going to get into, in this particular video, russian warships apparently simulated a nuclear strike. So that submarine that went to Cuba recently partook in exercises that simulated a nuclear strike on american warships.

This is according to a russian military expert, Khorachenko. He mentioned that russian warships conducted drills in the Atlantic Ocean on their way to Cuba, as reported by the russian defense ministry. The ministry said that a russian navy ship and Moscow’s Kazan nuclear powered submarine conducted the exercise to simulate a missile strike on a fleet of enemy ships. And of course, if you’re talking about one against the west and a fleet of ships, Ukraine doesn’t have a fleet of ships. This is not a conventional exercise about the arrival of our ships and submarines to Cuba. It was officially stated that the Kazan is the only sub that came there as part of the naval group of warships.

However, Khoroschenko said, in reality, we can guess that Kazan wasn’t the only one submarine. Very important. He suspects that there were several submarines, which might explain the increased military presence by the US Navy and the coast guard. Of course they’re gonna minimize it and say it’s no big deal, right? Even, you know, Trump, to his credit, said as much in a recent Q and a session that he was in how the media was downplaying this. In reality, it’s very significant. In reality, we can guess that the Kazan wasn’t the only one, but that there were a few russian multi purpose nuclear subs in different parts of the Atlantic Ocean carrying out their tasks.

Now, the Atlantic Ocean is massive, but of course we know that russian submarines are already in the Atlantic Ocean. They are everywhere. They would be there to support this particular submarine if something were to pop off. He said that the tasks are clear. Countering american aircraft carrier strike groups. If a strike is carried out, as it was stated, several hundred kilometers away against american aircraft carrier strike group, this strike would be done with special ordnance nuclear weapons for maximum effectiveness, speed and reliability. If you don’t believe me about the NATO increasing their readiness. That’s the article right there.

You can go and read it yourself. It’s on the Telegraph. Okay. I have no reason to make this stuff at this up at this point in time. I’m very busy at the homestead. In fact, that’s what I got to get to right now. So I’m going to cut it short today. If you want to support the channel, you can gear up with a top tier gear@canadianpreparedness.com. but we’re going to be doing a video in the coming days ahead that are going to show you three different options. One for if you have no money, what you can do in every aspect of preparedness.

One if you are a person of modest means, and one if you are a person where money is no option. Okay? So stay tuned for that. This week, of course, we’re showcasing the body armor component of things. If you don’t have body armor and you have a lot of weaponry, it’s like going into a hockey game and not having a goalie. Okay, so make sure you get your first aid supplies, your trauma kits, all that stuff. You can pretty much find everything@canadianpreparedness.com. but that is not going to last. So I’d encourage you to lock in whatever you need as soon as possible, especially preparedness supplies.

They don’t really depreciate at all, I mean, with the exception of certain tech aspects. And right now I should remind you that there is a tech bottleneck with thermal imagers. Thermal imagers are probably one of the few types of technology, I will say, which won’t depreciate anytime soon. In fact, if you have one, hold on to it dearly because they are in high demand right now. There is a backlog that they haven’t seen since the start of the war. So make sure if you can scoop one up. Get one. We currently don’t sell thermal imagers@canadianpreparedness.com. we were in talks with some companies to do that, but that and drones.

Okay, so if you want to get a drone, pick up a DJI mini drone before they’re banned outright because they will be banned soon. They just are the cheapest and most capable drones on the market that you can legally fly without a license. I think the house just passed a bill where they’re going to be banning the DJI Jones very quickly as well. Go back and watch our videos about this. Things that will be made illegal. We predicted that one long time ago, many years ago, I made a video where I talked about different things that were going to be made illegal.

Among those were things like body armor or things like high powered flashlights. The government hasn’t figured anything out about that yet, although they have started to regulate class three b lasers, which using a white phosphor type technology a lot of flashlights are using. So they’ve been regulated out. But what else? Different types of ham radio and stuff like that. So, you know, just check out our previous content. We pretty much have a video on every single possible prepping topic you can imagine, which is not to say that I’m an expert. In fact, that’s why I got to get going.

I got a lot of work to do building out a greenhouse right now. So stay tuned, guys. Just keep on prepping and act as though you only have a few months. Just don’t do anything stupid. Do not get demoralized. If you’re watching this channel and you’re one of these people who think that you’re just not going to be able to make the cut if and when something bad happens, I don’t know why you would even focus on this stuff. Just go and put your head in the sand. You’re better off. Okay? But if you’re somebody who, who feels that, that itch inside you, that you need to survive for whatever reason, if only for your posterity, the next generation, your community, something outside yourself, now is the time to really get everything dialed in.

Okay. Thanks for watching.
[tr:tra].

See more of Canadian Prepper on their Public Channel and the MPN Canadian Prepper channel.

BA WORRIED ABOUT 5G FB BANNER 728X90

Sign Up Below To Get Daily Patriot Updates & Connect With Patriots From Around The Globe

Let Us Unite As A  Patriots Network!


SPREAD THE WORD

Tags

counter American escalating tensions between NATO Russia and China increasing threats from Russia and China Jan Stoltenberg on NATO's nuclear arsenal NATO nuclear weapons preparation potential for preemptive nuclear strike potential impact of nuclear conflict on global economy preparing for potential conflict Russian submarines in Atlantic Ocean secrecy around operational nuclear weapons US Navy and Coast Guard increased activity

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *