➡ The text discusses the benefits of stressing the body in natural ways, such as cold showers, to increase resilience and health. It also explores the possibility of vaccines causing allergies due to the injection of foreign proteins, although this is not definitively proven. The text also questions the effectiveness of medical screenings, such as retinal photos exams for macular degeneration, arguing that these tests may not necessarily lead to better health outcomes.

➡ The text discusses three main topics: the importance of self-monitoring health, the potential benefits of natural remedies for respiratory issues, and the importance of a healthy diet for skin health. It suggests that regular health screenings may not be necessary if you’re feeling well and can monitor your own health effectively. For respiratory issues, it suggests natural remedies like turpentine tallow products or mustard compresses might help, especially for people with barrel chests who struggle to expel air efficiently. Lastly, it suggests that skin issues like vitiligo might be improved with a diet rich in healthy fats like lard, tallow, butter, ghee, and olive oil.

➡ The text discusses the importance of acknowledging past mistakes, such as harmful decisions, and learning from them. It emphasizes treating health issues as they arise, rather than speculating about potential problems. The author also shares their preference for natural, traditional foods and practices, expressing skepticism towards modern innovations like LED lights and specific fatty acid supplements. Lastly, the author advises against over-analyzing food components and instead recommends a diet of high-quality, traditional foods to maintain health.

➡ The text discusses the importance of a healthy lifestyle for preventing health issues like heart failure and improving blood flow. It suggests that the heart doesn’t pump blood, but blood flow comes from various factors like the properties of water, exposure to sunlight, and physical movement. The text also emphasizes the importance of a good diet, connection to the earth, and sunlight for maintaining good health. Lastly, it discusses the approach to treating a speech disorder, spasmodic dysphonia, by understanding the patient’s story and considering all aspects of their life, including physical, emotional, and spiritual factors.

➡ The speaker emphasizes the importance of honesty and self-respect, suggesting that by improving one’s diet and eliminating harmful substances, full recovery is possible. Despite the lengthy talk, the speaker appreciates the audience’s patience and looks forward to the next meeting.

Okay. Hi everybody, and thanks for coming to another Wednesday webinar. Today is Wednesday, April 23, 2025, and I was given about 24 questions written here. So I wanted to get right to basically going through the questions. I had one brief thing I wanted to mention before that. Hope everybody is doing well. That’s not what I was hoping to mention, but I do hope everybody is doing well. A lot of people have asked me what I think about the new attention and studies that are going to apparently happen on finding the cause of autism. So we were basically promised that we would know the cause of autism by September.

Although just about five or so minutes ago I saw an article where they apparently are changing that. So what do I think about that? I just want to show you the current definition in the DSM manual. That’s the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Illnesses. So they have a working definition of autism. So this, the following definition is from the DSM 4. I think that’s the current one, but I’m not sure about that. So you have to have six or more items from A and B and A, two from A and one each from B and C.

And it is a qualitative impairment in social interaction, market impairments in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye to eye gaze, facial expression, body posture, gestures to regulate social interaction. So the question for me is how are you going to document and say this amount of eye to eye gaze is normal and this amount of eye to eye gaze is not normal, these facial expressions are normal and these are not, this body posture is normal and these gestures are normal and these are not. And obviously at the extremes, it’s fairly easy to tell that something is wrong.

But most of the people who are diagnosed or labeled with autism or autistic spectrum disorder or told they’re on the spectrum are somewhere not in the, in the extremes of symptoms, but somewhere less severe than that. So how are you going to possibly do a study to demonstrate the existence of or the cause of some of these type of symptoms? So if you go on lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, how are you going to quantify that or make that into something that you can clearly define so that you could have that as the so called dependent variable and then you can isolate one independent variable which is required in order to show causation? There is no possible way to do that.

How can you document that this person doesn’t share in the achievements with other people? How can you document lack of social or emotional reciprocity? And then there’s Delay in spoken language. Then there’s individuals with adequate speech but marked impairment in the ability to initiate or sustain conversations with other. I’ve known, I don’t know how many people like that. And are they all autistic? If so, how do we know? There’s no test. There’s just all these things. Inflexible adherence to specific non functional routines or rituals. According to who? And then I’ve been through this hand flapping. So how many times per minute do you have to flap your hands? Or if you do it once a week, does that mean you’re autistic? If you do it three times a week, you’re autistic, but if you do it twice a week, you’re normal.

And so this is a mess how? Using symbolic or imaginative play, according to who? So to me, because there will never be able to determine a dependent variable or a definition of the thing you’re studying and you will never be able to determine an independent variable. In other words, the one thing that was changed, you are never going to be able to find the cause of autism or autistic spectrum disorders. And so the whole thing is a setup to fail, which is what it will. And they’ll say, well, we don’t really know what causes it, it’s multifactorial and we get nothing.

So what would I do instead? People have asked me. So the first thing is we have to get away from all these diagnostic categories because they’re essentially meaningless. There is no diagnosis of autism, but there are clearly children and people who are not doing well. And I would choose some of them. Children who never learned to use the, you know, the never learned to potty train or never learn to use the bathroom on their own. Children who never learned to, to speak with language. Children who are never able to be independent. All these very extreme kind of behaviors which we clearly see.

And I would get a group of them, and this is not a scientific study to show the cause because that would be impossible. And just get some of these children and then have the parents and maybe grandparents and maybe friends and maybe doctors tell the story on camera as to what happened. With permission of the children and the families, of course. Or maybe you can’t get permission with the children, but with the families, tell the story of what happened to them, hopefully with documentation, with pictures or videos or whatever other documentation you can have. So you would just have cases of the stories of people who other people clearly identify as not doing well.

That’s not that difficult to see. And all different types of not Doing well, some really not doing well and some really doing horribly, which there’s many children and people like that then tell their story and tell their story in the same way. We take a history and get the story in the new biology clinic and film that and package it in a way that people can see it and they can see the before and after and they can see the story of what happened. My child was fine and then they got dropped on their head and then they were like this and, and you can see it and you can choose for yourself whether you think getting dropped on your head from 10ft is a possible reason why somebody might not be doing well.

Or it could be vaccines, of which there will be hundreds, thousands and maybe even tens of thousands of cases like that where you can find children who are not doing well and you can document that and then within days, weeks, hours, months or so after the vaccines. And this does not prove causation by any means. Here is what you see. And they can’t identify any other factors and you should be able to ask the parents or caregivers any other factors that might have happened. And so you would get a complete a history as you can, you would show that to the people and the people can decide for themselves what they make of it.

That is how I would do this because there’s, I don’t see any other way to make this into a kind of scientific endeavor that would actually end up determining the so called cause of autism. And then we’re going to end up with a message and no better off than we started, which I suspect may be the whole point here. So that’s what I would do. And it’s about time we stop doing all these ridiculous so called scientific studies which end up getting us nowhere. Okay, so that’s my answer to that. And again, I’m going to try to be less long winded so I can get through as many of these questions as possible.

Of course, my intention of doing any webinar, but a question and answer in particular is to try to help people understand things in a different way. In other words, even though I don’t like this word so much, to teach people or help people understand a new way of thinking or a different way of thinking about health, illness and even how we understand anything, the process of thinking. Because as I keep saying, if the number one cause of everything in this country, there’s basically two factors. One is we’re scientifically illiterate and the other is we are victim, we have victim consciousness.

So those are the two underlying Causes for pretty much everything. And so every question and answer and every webinar is designed to combat those two things. So that’s why I tend to give longer answers and probably because I talk too much. So number one, if you are aware or familiar, any comment or opinion as to the WIM HOF method. So the WIM HOF method, for those who don’t know, he, I think is called the Iceman. And he’s spent a number of the last years talking about his method of combination of breathing technique, breathing exercises and cold water exposure, or cold exposure, not just water.

So I’ve had a number of people who’ve done it, and I think many of them have experienced what they think are some benefits. And I have no doubt that that may be the case. And I’ve done a little bit of cold water therapy and cold therapy myself. I don’t like it at all, but I did it anyways. And as I’ve said, every morning I splash ice cold water on my face five times. And so that’s how I basically start every morning. And I think that for me, what’s good about it is you’re stressing your body in a sort of natural, kind of mostly benign way.

In other words, if you take a cold shower, you’re very likely to survive that, even though you may not like it. And it puts your body under a certain amount of stress for those few minutes or seconds or, you know, five to 10 minutes, if you can do it that way, or dunk yourself in cold water. And I think that one of the problems of modern life is that we tend not to be challenged enough or, or appropriately stressed. There’s a difference between chronic unremitting stress versus, you know, trying to run faster or lift something heavier, or exposure to cold water or exposure to things that you’re not used to.

And all those things, I think, make you stronger and healthier and more resilient when people particularly if not done to two extremes. So I think that he basically has come up with a method of stressing people in a sort of natural and harmonious way that helps with increasing your breathing capacity, which is good, and your resilience to different types of temperature, which is good. And, and that as long as one doesn’t get carried away and overdo it, I think you will end up being stronger and more resilient. I could change my mind if I saw that everybody who does that ends up getting sick and dying earlier.

And I don’t see that happening at all. Everybody that I’ve seen who’s done it pretty intensely and seriously seems to have had number of significant improvements and that’s a positive thing. Okay, number two, Dr. Cowan, what do you think about vaccines being the cause of certain allergies like to eggs, chicken, meat, peanuts, etc. By way of the use of proteins like albumin in the shots? So first of all, we have to define what an allergy is, because that’s largely a misconception. Again, this goes back to the problem of if you breathe something in that’s not good for you and then you get a cough and get mucus.

Is the cough and the mucus a disease called allergies or is it the therapy of. In your body’s way of getting rid of something that you shouldn’t get in your body? And I think it’s pretty obvious that it’s the second. But the problem comes when. What if we’re talking about like birch trees or cats, for God’s sake. So you have this excessive reaction just simply to being around cats or birch trees or pine pollen, things that by, by all estimation, should be normal part of our human existence. So that’s. So that’s where it becomes an issue.

And I would say a problem. And what I would say about that is that means that the person is, I would say use the word over exuberant in getting things out of their body. So in other words, there’s no reason to have to make that much of an emotion of a physiological and sometimes emotional reaction to a birch tree or a cat. Although interestingly, and I haven’t tested this out except a little bit, I’ve heard that cats who eat a very natural diet, which is basically raw meat and, you know, game that they kill, like rabbits and mice and birds and that’s their diet, actually are far less allergenic than cats that eat nor, you know, normal, ish for these days, kibble and cat food.

And that’s basically what our cats eat, of course, is, you know, they just eat raw meat and liver and things like that, and they catch their own food. And we’ve definitely had people who claim to be allergic, highly allergic to cats, who don’t seem to have reactions around our cats. So it’s possible that may play into it, that it’s something the cats are giving off that the people are appropriately reacting to. But what I think is happening with the vaccines and allergens, because I do think it’s possible. So in other words, so what’s possible is that they inject you with something which is a traumatic and emotionally Charged and emotionally traumatic experience for any child.

So it’s a physiological trauma and a psychological, emotional trauma. Every single vaccine, every single time, there’s no getting around that. There’s no healthy or safe or any vaccine that you can give that has no repercussions, that’s simply not possible. They can be mild and you can seemingly be normal, but every actual vaccine has a negative repercussion. So what I think might happen is that if there’s peanut proteins or egg proteins in that vial because of where it was grown or how it was processed, or that they put some sort of peanut product in it in order to use it as an adjuvant or just to help the viscosity or something in that final product.

So then you’re injected with a foreign protein and you have this strong physiological and emotional reaction so which is in your body uses an inflammatory response to try to cleanse itself of that, of that insult. And then it somehow remembers, every time you get, you eat peanuts it’s, you remember that this was a, essentially a physiological and psychological emotional shock. And then you have what we call a peanut allergy. And that can seemingly happen for the rest of your life until you identify that that’s what happened and maybe somehow help the person work their way through the trauma that happened to them.

So yes, I do think that’s happened. I don’t think that I’ve seen that it’s documented as the cause because I think that would be extremely difficult to do for the reason that you could never identify. Nobody has ever been injected with just pure peanut protein vaccine with nothing else in it but peanut proteins and then develop peanut allergies in any kind of study that I know of. So that would be the only way to say that’s the cause. So I’m not claiming the cause, but I am wondering whether that that is a possible mechanism. And in any case there’s a whole lot of reasons never to do a vaccine anyways.

So that may be one of them. Okay, what do you think of optometrists prescribing retinal photos exams to screen for Armd? I was told it is necessary because I’m 77 and I’m short sighted. I avoid all screenings and want to refuse this one. Is this wise? I have no symptoms of anything wrong. I think this is a kind of adult macular degeneration and I don’t know the details and I don’t know, I haven’t seen any studies on whether when they do this screening whether people end up having better eyesight for the rest of their life than if they don’t do the screening.

But all I can say is, from every examination and investigation of any screening test that I’ve ever looked into, and I’ve talked about this a lot about screening for cancer and screening for heart disease, as far as I can see, none of them work and none of them even ask the right question. They sometimes ask questions like, if I screen, will I end up having lower cholesterol? And so that you may be able to demonstrate that if you screen people for cholesterol, a year later, the people who are screened may have lower cholesterol than the people who don’t.

I don’t know if that study’s ever been done, but that’s possible. You may even have a study that if you screen for breast cancer, then the people who get you test positive live longer than the people who you didn’t screen for breast cancer from the onset of their diagnosis. But often that’s because if you screen them, you find that you find the diagnosis three years earlier than if you just didn’t screen them and waited for them to have symptoms. So the people who you don’t screen, they live maybe four years. I’m just making this up. And so that’s three plus four is seven years.

Whereas the people you do screen, they live. Starting from the time you screen, they live six years. So it turns out that if you screen people for disease, they end up living one year shorter than if you just left them alone and wait for them to get symptoms and then treated them then. And so the whole thing doesn’t work. And it’s partly because they don’t ask the question, which is the only question that I would ask this optometrist or ophthalmologist, can you show me a study that people who are screened for this with this procedure end up having better eyesight for so many years or for the rest of their life compared to people who are not screened.

Because I think what they would tell you is, well, we don’t have that study, but we have studies that we diagnose macular degeneration sooner if we screen you, which is, of course you do, because you’re looking for it, and you wouldn’t be looking for it in the people that you don’t screen. But that doesn’t mean that they have a better outcome. And all you’re interested in, if anything, is whether this test will give you a better outcome, meaning a better quality and quantity of life. And I can almost bet you 10 to 1 that there is no study that shows that, in which case at this point, I don’t do any screening.

I don’t do any eye screening, any glaucoma screening, no blood test, cancer screening, nothing. I have tried to teach myself to get better and better at reading how I’m doing and to trust my insights and my instincts and my observations and maybe those with loved ones around me occasionally get feedback on what do you think about this? And that’s what I’m going on. And I think it’s also the most scientifically sound way to go. So the long and short answer is, if you’re feeling fine, I don’t think it’s going to do you any good. So next one will Vicks VapoRub help a lower respiratory detoxification event in a barrel chested person, perhaps by redirecting the detox via the skin? Barrel chested people have trouble expelling because their chest doesn’t expand.

Well, I mean, that’s. You’re actually correct. Barrel chest mean that the air compression and expansion, the chest compression and expansion is not as good as it should be. And so essentially you have trapped air in there which doesn’t expel the air as efficiently as it should. And therefore it is more difficult to expel mucus and get rid of dirt and whatever else may end up in your lungs. And so this can damage your lungs and then be the source of what are erroneously called respiratory infections. The reason is because without that expansion and contraction efficiently that is able to cleanse your lungs, you end up not being able to cleanse your lungs and you get trapped air and debris and other stuff in your lungs.

So it’s an interesting idea. If you do something like Vicks VapoRub, which I don’t think I would ever use because I think there’s things in there that you probably don’t want in your body or on your skin, but some sort of turpentine, because Vicks VapoRub has turpentine in it. We have this turpentine tallow product which is actually for respiratory ailments, which might do what you’re talking about, which is to help expect duration and maybe even help a cleansing through the skin. In fact, it reminds me that what in previous times, one of the main treatments for pneumonia was doing mustard compresses on the chest over the lungs, particularly in the back, which you would do until you would get like almost a first degree burn, a redness and even a little bit of pain on the skin over the chest.

The idea was that would Heat up the chest and help loosen the phlegm and also bring out things through the skin of the chest. And so I’ve seen that and actually have probably prescribed that maybe hundred or so times. It’s basically just get mustard seeds or mustard powder and make a paste and put it on a cloth and put that over the skin and keep checking it. You don’t want to get like a blistering burn, but just some redness. And that actually helped a lot of people with coughs and congestion and to get, you know, stuck, trapped debris out of their lungs.

And so that’s similar to the idea you’re talking about. And obviously an easy way to do it would be something with turpentine, which I would prefer something that’s made with less harmful ingredients than Vicks VapoRub. Okay. Instead of tanning, my skin has numerous white non pigment spots. Why is this? Is there a remedy? So we’re told that this is a kind of vitiligo which has essentially two quote causes. One is it’s a, quote autoimmune disease, which we know that can’t be because there’s no such thing. And the other is it’s a fungal infection. So we know that can’t be either because there are no infections.

But there are situations where the skin isn’t, or the tissue isn’t healthy, isn’t being formed properly and so then it’s damaged and then you get microbes coming to the site to help remediate. And that’s what we call a fungal or bacterial infection. And so that may be the case with this. And you may also get certain elements of the imaginary immune system that find their way there to help digest and clean up the debris. So basically what is happening is there’s not. The skin isn’t being nourished as well as it should, so it’s lacking something that it needs.

And so it’s not healthy skin tissue. And then you get. Either your own body brings different substances, which we erroneously say are part of the immune system to the area to try to help clean it up, or you get fungus, which is another way your body essentially manufactures fungus to help clean up the area. Of course we want neither of those to happen. It’s essentially treating illness is essentially the essence of what I keep saying is the basis is to not put your body in a situation where you have to have fungus come and help you clean up the dead tissue.

So you want to produce healthy skin. And I would say that a lot of that probably has to do with with diet. And so I would particularly focus on healthy fats. And the fats that I consider healthiest are lard and tallow and butter, grass fed butter and ghee and olive oil. And I forgot to mention this last time, but a little bit of coconut oil. And so if you consume liberal amounts of those, particularly some of them in their unheated, that is raw state, and this is particularly important with some of the butter should be raw butter and that should be, that should go a long way towards improving the, the quality of your skin and helping with this problem.

Okay, next one. After billions were injected with a bio cyber interface. I think he means what they some people call a vaccine. Should we just consider them a lost cause or can this technology, which is merging with our tissues synthetic biology, be excreted from the body with normal detox protocols? So let me rephrase the question. Should we say that? Anybody who’s given a say, I think you’re talking about a COVID vaccine. Are they basically doomed or is there any way to help them get rid of whatever was in that injection? So the first thing I would say is I think it’s clear or at least possible hypothesis that a certain number of the people who were injected were basically injected with nothing or a placebo or some sort of benign saline component.

And I don’t know this for sure. So I don’t think I should be quoted on this and I don’t know anybody who does know it for sure. But when you start looking at the amount of negative consequences as a function of the batch of the vaccine, it starts to look very suspicious. In other words, some batches had a huge amount of so called adverse reactions, whereas others have almost none. And to me, and I even wonder about this with the normal childhood vaccine injections, whether you know, if I was running this show and I didn’t want people to get, get wise to how harmful these injections were, I would at least give some of them, some of the people give them nothing like saline because then you would always have people who would say well I got the vaccine and I got three boosters and nothing happened to me.

And it’s very likely it’s because they got nothing. And if there’s enough people, it will take a lot longer for people to catch on. And I even wonder whether that’s happening with childhood shots because they obviously know there’s not anything in there that could help anybody not get sick. So that’s not the reason. So there is a kind of nefarious agenda. And again, I don’t know all these things for sure. So I’m speculating here, but that seems to me the case. So the first thing is it could be that most or some or some percentage of the people who actually got a so called COVID injection actually got nothing and they should be fine and so they shouldn’t worry about it, except they should figure out how not to be such suckers and not do that the next time because they may not get so lucky.

The second thing is I have never met a person or a patient who I consider to be a lost cause. I think we all make mistakes and we all do things we regret and we all do stupid things and sometimes we do really stupid things and we should learn from that and not do those stupid things again. But to say that somebody is a lost cause, even though this was a really stupid thing to do, I don’t see going down that track because I don’t know that that’s the case. So I would never assume that there’s nothing that can be done.

Now it is true that I don’t know what’s in there and I don’t know that we know how to detoxify from something that we don’t even know what it is. But I think most of the detoxification methods are pretty generic. You know, they’re either water soluble, fat soluble, or stored deeper in the tissue. And there’s a few sort of time honored ones. Everything from coffee enemas to fasting to turpentine to clay and a whole lot of other things which we’ve mentioned. And I have no reason to say that one is a better way to detoxify with, with vaccine injury or injections.

But I think if one does the hard work of really saying, of examining what led you to make that decision and to really honor yourself, that you’re not going to make that decision again, that it was a mistake, you regret it and that you’re going to move on and you acknowledge that you made it. I think that’s a huge part of this. You have to own that you made that decision and you’re not going to make that decision anymore. You’re done hurting yourself deliberately or because on the say so of people who you don’t know and don’t know whether they’re trustworthy and even you have a lot of reasons to think they’re not.

So you’re not going to do that anymore. And I’m going to try different things. Just slowly, carefully saunas, turpentine, clay, coffee enemas and Assess realistically and as objectively as possible. What happens when I do this? How do I feel? And I can’t say that at our clinic, we know that we have detoxified people after the injection, but we do know that we have people who have been gotten sick following Covid injections who are now doing a lot better. And so I wouldn’t. I guess what the bottom line of what I’m saying is with this and with everything, you treat what you see.

In other words, if you have a salivary issue after an injection, you treat that. If you have pain in your knee, you treat that. You, the less speculation and the less theory, the better you treat what you see, you have pain in your knee, you do the things that we do to help get that better and go from there. What are my thoughts on LED lights? So people are asking me a lot of questions, which I know very little not, I wouldn’t say nothing about. And I’m going basically on instincts here, which whatever that means. So in other words, what.

What does that mean? What is my compass? My compass, as I’ve said a lot of times, like with food, that if the food wasn’t around 150 years ago, then I don’t eat it. All the foods that I eat now, I think were basically available 150 years ago. You know, people ate fish and they ate meat and they. They made lard and they made tallow and they fermented sauerkraut. And maybe broccoli was a new hybrid, but I think it’s been there for a while. So even if it wasn’t actually broccoli around then, there were different plants in the brassicas family which are similar.

And I eat wild nettles and harvest wild ramps and eat olives and olive oil pressed from fresh olives. And so all those foods were around as far as movement, I try to work on movements. Walking, lifting, raking, hoeing. We cleaned out the goat barn today. We got some help, luckily, but it was an hour and a half of shoveling manure and wet urine soaked hay and carting it to the compost pile. And all these are things that people have done for hundreds or more years. And so that’s my compass. So when I come to lighting, I say, what lights have people been exposed to for hundreds of years and.

Or at least 100 years? And my answer, as far as I know, is natural sunlight, flames from candles and fires, and then incandescent lights, which I think essentially mimic how the spectrum of the sun. And even when I Hear myself say spectrum. I already start to get a little nervous because it’s already getting too analytical for me. It seems like incandescent lights, which are essentially the only electric light bulbs that we use, with rare exceptions of when I’m doing a webinar or something and I have to use some sort of light. We either use incandescent lights, candles, fire, or sunlight.

So I don’t use LED lights except in certain things which I seem to have no choice in, and I’m not sure what those would be, and I don’t like them. And I hear they have all kinds of frequencies and wavelengths that are not good for us. And that may or may not be true. My compass is I don’t need it and it hasn’t been around and it’s guilty until proven innocent, and nobody has proved it that it’s healthy. So I don’t use it. And I don’t even like using it on grow lights to help my plants grow.

I like using natural light and putting them out in the sun as best I can. Okay, Tom, I’d love to hear your thoughts on C15 fatty acid supplements. So this is the same answer, but now we’re talking about fatty acid supplements instead of lights. As far as I know there were. And so, again, let me just clarify. I don’t know much about C15 fatty acid supplements. I’ve never taken one. I’ve never looked into it, so I’m largely speaking out of ignorance here. But I have heard of it. And the reason why I haven’t looked into it is because I don’t want to eat a certain fatty acid supplement, because I don’t think that’s healthy human food.

I think the oil from emus is healthy food. I think the oil rendered from pigs or cows, that’s called lard or tallow, is healthy food. I think the fat from butter or from cow’s milk is healthy food. But I don’t think a processed, purified C15, which is the number of carbons in the chain fatty acid supplement, is a healthy food. Now, I’m not saying that it isn’t possible that there’s some information or cases or studies that if people have lupus or rheumatoid arthritis or toenail fungus, eat C15 fatty acid supplement, they get better. I don’t know that there is such a study, and I would tend to be very suspicious of it in the first place, but even if there were, I’d still probably avoid it, and maybe I would look into where this fatty acid allegedly occurs.

In nature. But again, as I keep saying, the more I actually learn about it and think about it, the less I want to be analytical about food. It’s the same question as the fellow, the friend of mine, who said. Who was so angry at me because he had had a heart attack. And he said it was because he was eating saturated fat. And so I, of course, asked him what saturated fat tasted like, and he was. I’d say the word is non plus. Like, what do you mean? And I said, well, if you, if, if this is because you ate too much saturated fat, I’d be interested in what a saturated fat tastes like or what a C15 fatty acid tastes like.

And of course, there is no food that’s just a C15 fatty acid or a saturated fat, in which case he’s. What he’s saying is, I ate too much butter and that’s why I got a heart attack. Which is interesting because the time, and at least that we know of with, you know, American history, when people didn’t have heart attacks was when they ate the most butter and cream and eggs. And so I doubt that that’s what happened. And nobody eats saturated fat. Nobody eats a C15 fatty acid. Those are highly processed foods, chemicals which may have effects and may even have temporary positive effects.

But to me, that’s not food and that’s not what I want to be putting into my body. And so I don’t feel like I need to eat that. This is similar. Why do we see a sudden thiamine deficiency in vaccine Injured? I would caution against the conclusion that this is a thiamine deficiency. Again, the question that I always am asking people, and in the groups that I lead and the people at the clinic, what do you see? So you don’t see a thiamine deficiency. And you could even say, well, how did you know that there is thiamine in a human living being? And then you get involved with biochemistry and you do things like you take blood and then you mix it with this and you mix it with that.

And then how do you know that the mixing it with this didn’t create something that wasn’t there in the first place? And so I’ve. I’m a recovering analyst of the components of food, so I don’t know that there are B vitamins. What I do know is that when people don’t eat certain things, they get sick. And when people are injected with poison, they get sick. And if they do a combination of don’t eat certain things and inject themselves with poison, they get Sick more often than if they just do one of those. So I would say if you’re inject, if you’re thinking about, which I wouldn’t do, or you know, of injecting yourself with poison, or you know, somebody who has give them the best quality food you can, including things like liver and all this sort of bone broth and good fats and nourishing traditions, quality food.

And then you don’t have to worry about thiamine or any other deficiency. And maybe you have to help with the gut function a little bit by eating probiotic food and broth and all that, but you don’t have to worry about thiamine deficiency. You can’t prove that that’s what happened anyways. You can hardly even prove that there is thiamine in food or in living things. And I think that’s the. It’s an animistic, materialistic way of looking at life, which we need to get away from. And we need to focus on what it is that we see, which is children, people who are poorly nourished get more injury when they’re injected with poison.

And I would say stop the presses because that’s completely obvious that that should would and should happen. And if you don’t want that to happen, do two things. One, be properly nourished and don’t inject yourself with poisons. Okay. What causes heart failure and low flow? How can one improve low flow? So we’ve talked about this a lot. This has to do with the question of where does the flow in the blood come from? And it’s certainly not from a push or a pumping action of the heart. The heart is not a pressure propulsion device, meaning generating propulsion because of the pressure built up from the contraction of the walls.

In fact, the flow of the blood comes from the periphery and is a combination of a number of factors. One, the fourth phase, properties of water. And this is aided by connection to the earth. So connection to the earth helps your body, helps the water in your. In your capillaries get into this fourth phase, where there is a separation of charges, which is the origin of the flow. And also exposure to the sun and the light of the sun, not LED lights, also helps the water become. In this fourth phase, where there’s a separation of charges, which is the origin of the flow.

The other things that help the flow are the contraction, the spiral contraction down of the heart and then the plunging contraction, also in a vortex up of the heart. So that also sucks the blood from the periphery back up to the heart. Another thing that helps the blood flow from the periphery back to the heart. And that is the problem with congestive heart failure. The flow from the periphery to the heart is weak. And so you need to do all the things that are naturally part of this development of the flow. And so that’s sunlight, earthing, healthy, structured water to drink, good fats and bone broth is in the diet.

And then another very important thing is movement. Because the movement in your legs, the muscle contraction of your legs, also helps with the movement of the blood in the capillaries and in the veins back up to your heart. So the more you move, the more blood flow you’ll have and the less congestive heart failures you’ll have. So the combination is good diet, connection to the earth. So bare feet or a grounding stick, connection to sunlight. So being out in the sun, especially as much of your exposed skin as possible, and then movement. So if you put those together, moving, walking, running, jumping, crawling, hopping on the beach, in a charged environment, in the sunlight, or on grass or on stones or whatever, is the remedy for treating low blood flow and therefore congestive heart failure.

And that should be the first thing that everybody does who has a poor circulation, low blood flow, or so called congestive heart failure. Get out and move with your bare feet on the earth, eat a good diet, get to a normal weight, be in the sunshine, and then eventually take strafanthus as well. All right, well, this is a different question, a different angle on an RFK Jr. Question. What do you think might cause spasmodic dysphonia? And if he approached your new biology clinic for help, what would you recommend? Do you think it can be treated and reversed or reversed? So the final thing of part of that question, whenever somebody came to me and anybody comes to the new biology clinic, all our practitioners start out with the assumption, with the thinking that we can help this person have a better life.

Now, we don’t believe in diseases, so we’re not saying we can cure your disease. But since the disease isn’t the issue anyways, that’s essentially a make believe type of categorization. So we’re not trying to cure any disease, we’re trying to help your life be better. Now what you’re asking me is if somebody comes and they can’t speak properly, and that’s what’s making their life not as good as they would like it to be, or not as good as it could be. So that is the issue. So the first thing we would do, which is the same, we would do the same thing as we would do every single time, is you find out what the story is.

Now in this case, you’re always a little bit aware of. So the main presenting issue is you don’t speak as clearly and as well as you would like to. That’s the issue, right? Yes, that’s the issue. So you think about it a little bit physiologically, you think it a little bit about it anatomically, and you think about it also emotionally, psychologically, and maybe even use the word spiritually. So you’re thinking about it on all those levels. You also of course ask what the story is. Is there anything else wrong? How’s your digestion, your diet, what do you, how do you sleep? What do you, you know, does your foot hurt? And when did this start? And the whole thing.

We do the same thing. I did the same thing every single patient, every single encounter, whether it was spasmodic dysphonia or so called flu, or so called dementia, or so called cancer. When were you last? Well, how did you feel then? And then what happened? So I’ve heard him say that he thinks this may be related to flu shots that he got yearly. And so I would go through the story and any of the doctors at the clinic would start with, so you were last. Well, when? 1996. No issues at all? No bowel issues? No issues with your voice? Nothing? No, nothing.

Then what happened? So then I got this flu shot and then it felt a little funny in my throat and then I got the next one. And so then what happened? This is what happened. Then I got everyone for 10 years and that’s what happened. Now my guess is the story won’t be as clear as that and so that you look for other exposure to, because the coordination of the voice, which is the problem here, has a lot to do with nerve function. So I would be particularly interested in asking whether he’s been around any neurotoxins or fat soluble poisons or has a diet that doesn’t nourish his healthy fat metabolism or healthy fats in his body or something that might have poisoned the water.

Because we know that a fat, sorry, a nerve is a fatty coating of organized water. So there would be a whole lot of questions about all the things related to fats and nerve function and any other nerve function, etc. And then we would get into, there’s always a symbolic and a reason why the body makes, puts its location of injury in this place opposed to some nerve function somewhere else. So we’re talking about somebody who is unable to speak as well and clearly as he would like. And so you have to wonder whether he’s using his speech organs, the larynx and all the things that go into the production of speech properly.

Because it may be that his body is saying, if you keep saying this, I’m going to make it so you can’t speak. Or at least people don’t want to listen to you, just like we do. If you keep poisoning me, I’m going to put it into a bag and that’s called a cancer. Or if you keep breathing in dust, I’m going to put it in mucus and cough it out so that I can be better, because I don’t want all that particulate debris in my lungs. So the body has physiological and anatomical and psychological, emotional, symbolic ways of choosing which organ, which function to target.

So there would be a whole lot of questions of whether there has been any times in his life where he has been conflicted about what he says or told things that weren’t true, that his body may be trying to get him to speak in a different way and to see if there would be any connection that he has with any of those things. And again, usually when you hit the mark, there is an emotional response. Usually people either cry or they get tearful, or sometimes they laugh or they have an obvious emotional reaction which tells you that this is an area of importance to their whole life, to their overall being.

And that’s what you would need to correct. And I would imagine that once you identify all those areas and remediate them and understand all the things that may have been said that weren’t true, then you grieve that you chose to do that, and you grieve that you chose to speak to the world in a way that wasn’t honest. And you essentially honor yourself and say, I’m not going to do that anymore. And you straighten out your diet and maybe get rid of some fat soluble poisons, I would fully expect a hundred percent recovery. So I only got through half and I was probably more long winded than I would have hoped.

But I like to stick to an hour. I appreciate everybody’s sticking with me for an hour. I know it’s a while, but thank you for all for listening and have a great week and I will see you next week.
[tr:tra].

See more of DrTomCowan on their Public Channel and the MPN DrTomCowan channel.