➡ Ron Partain, in a communication to the Untold History Channel, discussed a hiccup with the livestream setup causing a delay and, once rectified, led a discussion on the Oded Yinon plan about the balkanization of Middle Eastern countries for the Greater Israel Project. He also mentioned his upcoming cataract surgery and shared an article and video discussing Israeli-Palestinian conflicts.
➡ The text involves a historical analysis of the relationship between Mossad and Hamas, highlighting that Hamas was founded in 1987 and was reportedly supported by Israeli intelligence to weaken the Palestinian Authority. It states that Israel allowed Hamas to grow, embraced repressive measures against other Palestinian factions, and contends with critical UN assessments of the Israeli government’s treatment of Palestine. The text also touches on Greater Israel Project, a plan that extends Israel’s territory significantly, which is linked to U.S. foreign policy and involves destabilizing regional powers, further annexation of territories, and political fragmentation in the Middle East.
➡ The text discusses the Greater Israel Project, a strategic initiative allegedly sponsored by the US, Israel, NATO, and Saudi Arabia, aimed at breaking up neighboring Arab states into smaller, weaker units to expand Israel’s influence and meet America’s imperial design. The concept, often referred to as ‘Balkanization’ based on historical division of the Balkan Peninsula, involves creating proxy states, dividing existing ones, and forging sectarian-based states to serve as Israeli satellites.
➡ The text discusses Israeli ideologies of aiming for regional hegemony by fragmenting neighboring Arab nations and making Israel a world power. Simultaneously, it criticizes Arab and Palestinian strategy for lack of coherence and understanding of Zionist plans. It reviews an essay, ‘A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s’, arguing that Israeli aspirations reflect strategic ideas from 1890-1933 Germany and call for the division of existing states.
➡ The text expresses the decline in traditional western ideologies and their insufficient ability to address the realities of limited resources, political oppression, and global instability. It paints a complex picture of global politics, emphasizing the USSR’s influence, the imbalances in the Middle East, and the inherent tensions due to arbitrarily drawn boundaries and the resulting ethnic conflicts.
➡ The text discusses the political instability and civil unrest in the Middle East due to the power struggle between Sunni and Shiite factions, as well as ethnic minorities. Despite the oil wealth in certain regions, the area suffers from major economic issues with a large wealth gap and poverty. This situation, plus the legacy of territorial compromises including the Camp David Accords, impose threats and opportunities for Israel, which faces a significant crisis regarding energy resources and needs to implement changes in order to survive.
➡ The text discusses Israel’s strategic plan for the 1980s including the reinstitution of control over Sinai as a response to Egypt’s economic and political instability. The plan suggests fragmenting Arab nation-states into smaller, manageable regions; outlines the perceived threats from countries such as Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian Peninsula; and emphasizes the crucial role of demographic and strategic rebalancing within Israel itself for national survival in a nuclear epoch.
➡ The text discusses the strategic objective of transitioning from a centralized economy to a free-market system and the need for Israel to become self-reliant, economically and militarily. It highlights the potential consequences of not voluntarily adapting to global economic, political, and energy developments as well as impending changes in the status of world Jews. The text emphasizes the importance of Israeli military superiority and believes in the eventual division of the Arab world. It criticizes the lack of substantial opposition within Israel and the inability of the Arab world and the U.S. to analyze Israeli society critically.
➡ The text outlines the controversial Greater Israel Plan, theorizing that Israel seeks regional supremacy through destabilizing surrounding areas and promoting their division into smaller states, in order to appear as the sole stable entity. This involves authors and various texts supporting or suggesting this view, including the works of Israel Shaq and theories around the Khazar Empire’s global infiltration. The text further hypothesizes about global destabilization as a disguise for financial system failures.
➡ The speaker speculates that the government and wealthy corporations purposely exploited the COVID-19 pandemic by placing infected patients in vulnerable populations, like in nursing homes, which led to numerous deaths. They also scrutinize the mass production of the COVID vaccine, referring to an interview with a Pfizer whistleblower who suggested that the vaccine’s production lacked proper manufacturing practices. The speaker encourages viewers to critically analyze these events, despite their lack of concrete evidence or clear resolution.

To the Untold History Channel. My name is Ron Partain, and I apologize. Apparently there was a little bit of a hiccup in me setting up the live stream on this, and I don’t exactly know what happened, but when I went in to go do it, it said that there was an issue, so I had to redo it real quick. So I’m going to give it a second here and let some of the people flow in because I’m guessing that there’s going to be some late comers here.

So I’m just going to give it a second here and let some of the people populate. Let them populate in. Let’s see here. Let’s see. I’m going to do something so that I can make. I’ve got to know which one that I’m going to delete here because on the back end of Rumble, there’s some stuff that I want to delete. The wrong one. Anyhow, how’s everybody tonight? Hope everybody is doing well.

If you tuning in from the Constitution class, we just got finished with that and now we’re going to have some fun doing this. Let’s see here. Yeah, got a few people coming in here. All right, I see the people are starting to come on in. So again, apologize, guys. Apologize for the delay. It was not something that I intended to happen. Let’s see. Actually, let me do one thing here and see.

Okay, Mike, you’re getting to see the, you’re getting to see me do some of the things behind the scenes that I otherwise wouldn’t do. Okay. So that one is thinking and that one is not working. So that’s the one that I got to delete. All right, apologize for the delay, guys. There’s going to be some crossover from people who are going to be confused about the links. So I’m just trying to allow for people to be able to come in and not be confused.

All right. And the people are now starting to come in. So hello. Thank you, Patriot Grandma. Appreciate that. Yeah, the people are starting to flow in. Okay. I was watching an interesting video this morning. A lot of times when I’m trying to think of ideas for shows, it’s like I don’t even really know what to do. And I was watching an interview from the Black Swan capitalist this morning, and it was an interview of Jim Willie, and one of the gentlemen in there was talking about the Odin Yidden plan, and I was, what? What is that? I’d never heard of that.

And essentially it’s about the balkanization of the Middle east, specifically of the Arab countries in the Middle east for the purposes of the Greater Israel Project and whatnot and Redneck. Nice to see you, my friend. It’s been a while, actually, it’s been quite a long minute since I’ve seen you. So. Hey, Colin, how are you? So anyway, when they said the Odin union plan, I was like, that sounds very interesting.

So I did a little bit of research on it, and I’m like, okay, this is definitely something that I’m going to do tonight. So I found a couple of articles, and there’s quite a bit of stuff out there on this, and I’m going to go through some of this and read it. And I think there’s one video, one short video that I’m going to play, but for the most part, this is just going to be me reading.

But there’s a lot to this. With that being said, let’s see here. With that being said, actually, I need to do something here because that’s going to be too much. It’s a little bit too ambitious, and this will make it a little bit easier for me to read because what I try to do is I try to make the screen as big as possible for you guys so that you guys can see it, and for me, so that I can see it and everybody can be happy.

So I need to be able to see because my eyesight don’t work too good right now until I get my surgery done. On my cataracts, I’m what they call monovision. So I see distance out of my right eye and I see close up with my left eye. And when I had my retinal detachment back in May, it was in my left eye. So the left eye is what I use to see up close, and that’s the one that kind of is a little bit foggy.

So it’s kind of like getting well, if you’ve ever had a cataracts, some of you have, some of you haven’t. Basically what it does is that the outside of your lens or the lens kind of gets cloudy and it makes it very difficult to see. It’s kind of like trying to look out of a stained glass window. And because my left eye is the one that I use to see things up close, it’s making things very difficult for me to read.

So, anyway, that said, now you know all my medical challenges. I swear to God, when I hit the 50 button, man, it was like all things went downhill. Anyway, let’s see here. The greater Israel project, the Zionist plan for the Middle east or the infamous ODed Yenon plan. And I think I’ve got it spelled incorrectly on the fact. I’m going to change that real quick because it’s not correct.

It’s the ODeD Yinon plan. So let me make that very brief correction so that I can be accurate and we’re good to go. All right, so, yes, now I can see it says it correctly. I’m a perfectionist. So that’s like, it was driving me nuts, so I had to correct it and then hit refresh. All right, guys, let’s jump in here and get this party started here. Okay, so the Greater Israel Project designist plan for the Middle East.

The infamous ODID Yenon plan, or this is introduction by Michael Chas Dovsky. I’m probably butchering that. From October the 7th of 2023, there’s some updated analysis on this. So Hamas launched Operation Al Aksa Storm, which was led by its military chief, Mohammed Deaf. On that same day, Netanyahu confirmed a so called state of readiness for war. Israel has now, as of October 7, officially declared a new stage of its long war against the people of Palestine.

Military operations are invariably planned well in advance. CNET and Yahoo’s January 2023 statement below was Operation Al Aksa Storm a surprise attack? Question the US intelligence say they weren’t aware of an impending Hamas attack. Did Netanyahu and his vast military intelligence apparatus, Masad at all have foreknowledge of the Hamas attack was a carefully formulated Israeli plan to wage an all out war against Palestinians envisioned prior to the launching by Hamas of Operation Al Aqsa Storm.

This was not a failure of Israeli intelligence as conveyed by the media. Quite the opposite. Evidence and testimony suggest that Netanyahu’s government had foreknowledge of the actions of Hamas, and they let it happen. Following the Aloxa Storm operation on October 7, Israel’s Defense minister described Palestinians as human animals and vowed to act accordingly. As fighter jets unleashed a massive bombing of the Gaza Strip or the Middle East Eye, a complete blockade of the Gaza Strip was initiated on October the 9th of 2023, consisting in preventing and obstructing the importation of food, water, fuel and essential commodities to the 2.

3 million Palestinians. It is an outright crime against humanity. Was Operation Aloxa Storm a surprise attack? Was it a false flag? Nunyahu’s new stage of the long war against Palestine Nunyahu stated above or stated objective, which constitutes a new stage in the 75 year old war since Nakba 1948 C. Below. Against the people of Palestine is no longer predicated on apartheid or separation. This new stage, which is also directed against Israelis who want peace, consists in total appropriation, as well as the outright exclusion of the Palestinian people from their homeland.

The current Netanyahu government is committed to the Greater Israel and promised land, namely Biblical homeland of the Jews. Benjamin Nanyahu is pressing ahead to formalize Israel’s colonial project, namely the appropriation of all Palestinian lands. His position, defined below several months prior to the October 7 State of readiness for work, insists in total appropriation as well as the outright exclusion of the Palestinian people from their homeland. And it says, these are the basic lines of the national government headed by me.

The Jewish people have an exclusive and unquestionable right to all areas of the Land of Israel. The government will promote and develop settlements in all parts of the Land of Israel, in the Galilee, in the Negev, in the Golan, Judea and Samaria. And that was as of January of 2023. Now, this right here is an article called Netanyahu gives Israelis the Green Light to shoot Palestinians. And I went to this article, and I’m not going to read it, but there is a short minute and 48 video of this here, and I’m going to go ahead and play it and let me know if you guys can hear it.

You should be able to hear it just fine. Um, Shakimba Hopatani. But, you know, democracy, in order to protect both Palestinians and Israeli citizens so there be less terror attacks like this, you should not tell. All right, so that was just a short little video from Al Jazeera that I thought was pretty crazy. So let’s see here. And now we’re going to kind of get into some history, which is my strong point.

History. The relationship between Mossad and Hamas. What is the relationship between Mossad and Hamas? Is Hamas an intelligence asset? There is a long history. Hamas, or Harakat al Mak, I butchered that, I’m sure. Islamic resistance Movement was founded in 1987 by Sheikh Ahmed Yasin. It was supported at the outset by Israeli intelligence as a means to weaken the Palestinian Authority. And of course, Ron Paul talked about that from the congressional floor.

Thanks to Mossad, Israeli’s Institute for Intelligence and Special Tasks, Hamas was allowed to reinforce its presence in the occupied territory. Meanwhile, Arafat’s Fatah Movement for National Liberation, as well as the Palestinian left, were subjected to the most brutal form of repression and intimidation. Let us not forget that it was Israel which in fact created Hamas. According to Ziev Sternal, historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel thought that it was a smart ploy to push the Islamicists against the Palestinian Liberation Organization.

The links of Hamas to Mossad and US intelligence have been acknowledged by Rep. Ron Paul in a statement to the US Congress. Hamas was started by Israel Hamas. If you look at the history, you’ll find out that Hamas was encouraged and really started by Israel because they wanted Hamas to counteract Yasar Arafat. And that was what Ron Paul said from the congressional war in 2011. What this statement entails is that factions within Hamas constitute an intelligence asset, namely an asset which serves the interests of intelligence agencies.

See also Wall Street Journal, January 24 of 2009 How Israel helped to spawn Hamas instead of trying to curb Gaza’s Islamicists from the outset, says Mr. Cohen, Israel for years tolerated and in some cases encouraged them as a counterweight to the secular nationalists of the Palestinian Liberation Organization and its dominant faction, Yasser Arafatz Fata. And that was the World Wall Street Journal emphasis added the Nakaba commemoration on May 13 of 2023 the Nakba 75 years ago on May 13, 1948 the Palestinian catastrophe prevails in a 2018 report okay, Redneck, that caught my eye.

In a 2018 report, the United nations stated that Gaza had become unlivable. Let me pause it there for a second. For those of you who are watching this after the fact, in the live chat, somebody just said, I need a penis warmer, so now you’ll understand why I paused and had a chuckle. Okay, so with an economy in free fall, 70% youth unemployment, widely contaminated drinking water and a collapse, a collapsed health care system, Gaza has become unlivable in 2018.

According to the Special Reporter on Human Rights in the Palestinian territories, the above UN assessment dates back to 2018. Under Netanyahu, Israel is currently proceeding with the plan to annex large chunks of Palestinian territory while keeping the Palestinian inhabitants in conditions of severe deprivation and isolation. Creating conditions of extreme poverty and economic collapse constitute the means for triggering the expulsion and exodus of Palestinians from their homeland. It is part of the process of annexation.

If the maneuver is successful, Israel will end up with all the territories it conquered during the 1967 war, including all of the Golan Heights and Jerusalem and most of the Palestinian territories, including the best source of water and agricultural land. The West bank will find itself in the same situation as the Gaza Strip, cut off from the outside world and surrounded by hostile military forces. And I don’t know if it says south front, I don’t know what that means.

Human rights ended at the Palestinian border. The bought and paid for US Congress couldn’t genuflect enough. On July 19 of 2023, the US Congress convened a special joint session for Israeli President Isaac Herzog. Both Democrats and Republicans bobbed up and down and applauded him 29 times. Watching Palestinian. Watching Palestine disappear Dr. Paul Craig Roberts in September, the twelveth of 2023, Greater Israel would create a number of proxy states.

It would include parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, the Sinai, as well as parts of Iraq Ans and Saudi Arabia. Palestine is gone. Gone. The Palestinian plight is savagely painful, and the pain is compounded by the bafflingly offhand dismissal and erasure by Western powers of that pain. Rieman Najar Global Research June 7 of 2020. And then Michael Chadusky on June 10 of 2021, October 11 of 2023, and November, the first of 2023.

And I think that’s actually supposed to be for the introductory text of the Greater Israel Product Project. Okay, so 1 second here, somebody saying, can you please provide in the comment section your source for this article? Stand by. I think I put it in, I think I put it in the description, but maybe I didn’t. Let me check. No, that’s actually the wrong article. Standby. I will get that for you.

Stand by. Where did I go? Here, let it. I will find it. Standby, guys. Go to the history and I will find it because I know exactly where to go to look for it was from. Here it is. I’m going to put it in the chat here, guys. So there it is on the chat. And I’m going to put it into the. I’m going to put it in the description right now as we speak it.

I thought I did this earlier, so I apologize for taking the time to do this, but it is now saved. And last but not least, I will put it as the number, as the top comment in the comment section. So it’s in there three spots. Okay, so back to the article. InTroductory text on the Greater Israel Project the following document pertaining to the formation of Greater Israel constitutes the cornerstone of powerful Zionist factions within the current Netanyahu government, the Lakud Party, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence establishment.

President Donald Trump had confirmed in January of 2017 his support of Israel’s illegal settlements, including his opposition to UN Security Council Resolution 2334 pertaining to the illegality of the Israeli settlements in occupied West Bank. The Trump administration expressed its recognition of Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, and now the entire West bank is being annexed to Israel under the Biden administration. Despite rhetorical shifts in the political narrative, Washington remains supportive of Israel plans to annex the entire Jordan river valley as well as the illegal settlements in the West Bank.

Bear in mind, the Greater Israel design is not strictly a Zionist project for the Middle East. It is an integral part of U. S. Foreign policy. Its strategic objective is to extend U. S. Hegemony as well as fracture and balkanize the Middle East. In this regard, Washington’s strategy consists in destabilizing and weakening regional economic powers in the Middle east, including Turkey and Iran. This policy, which is consistent with the Greater Israel, is accompanied by a process of political fragmentation.

Since the Gulf War in 1991, the Pentagon has contemplated the creation of a free Kurdistan, which would include the annexation of parts of Iraq, Syria and Iran, as well as Turkey. And here’s the map on the screen, if you can see it. And it’s got the. I will mark this up for you guys so that you can see it. So this is, this right here is Sunni Iraq, and this right here is Arab Shia state.

And it’s actually going around Kuwait because this is Kuwait right here. And then this is free Kurdistan right there. And it’s carving up an actual substantial portion of Saudi Arabia. Because if you know anything about Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia basically is like this right here, all the way down to the peninsula and all the way up into Jordan. So this is like what modern Saudi Arabia is. So the Islamic sacred State is they’re basically chopping up Saudi Arabia and parts of Iran.

Or ain’t that ain’t fun? That doesn’t look good. The new Middle east unofficial US military academy map by Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Peters. So that ain’t a very good thing. According to the founding Fathers of Zionism, Theodore Herzel, the area of the Jewish state stretches from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates. According to Rabbi Fishman, the promised land extends from the river of Egypt up to the Euphrates.

It includes parts of Syria and Lebanon. So if you look here on this part of the map that you can see here, that’s essentially. I’ll do this again for y’all. I’ll do it in blue. Basically, all of this area right here is all greater Israel. This is what they want to be Israel. And right now, just so that, you know, just so you see, Israel right now is basically right here, that little piece right there.

And actually, I’ll do it in a different. I’ll do it in red so that you could see the difference. This is basically what Israel is, right? This is. This is what they want to be Israel. All this other part, that’s the greater Israel project. Okay. Viewed in the current context, including the siege on Gaza, the Zionist plan for the Middle east bears an intimate relationship to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the ongoing wars on Syria, Iraq and Yemen, not to mention the political crisis in Saudi Arabia.

The Greater Israel Project consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of the US Israeli expansionist project with the support of NATO and Saudi Arabia. In this regard, the Saudi Israel re approachment is, from Netanyahu’s viewpoint, means to expanding Israel’s sphere of influence in the Middle east as well as confronting Iran. Needless, I’m sure that’s supposed to be needless to say. The greater Israel Project is consistent with America’s imperial design.

And you know what? I’m going to go back here for a second because there’s a term that’s used here called Don’t. I think there’s a lot of people who probably don’t know what the term Balkanization is, and I’m going to take a second to show you what that means because I think it’s an important thing for you all to understand. Okay, so the Balkans are right here. If you’re looking at the map.

If you’re looking at the map here. Okay. So I’m going to use red to start with. So this is the border of like, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Greece and Albania. Okay. So this whole area right here, if you’re looking at it, this whole area is, at one time this was called Yugoslavia. All right? Now what they ultimately did was, and this is called they Balkanized it. And when they balkanized it, what that means is they broke it up into tiny little pieces.

So you’ve got Macedonia, you got Albania, you’ve got Montenegro, you’ve got Kosovo, you’ve got Serbia, you’ve got Bosnia and Hersheykovania. You’ve got Croatia and Slovenia. And that’s what they mean when they Balkanize something, they break it up into tiny little pieces, and that’s ultimately what they want to do with the United States. They want to balkanize the your. For your reference, whenever you hear the term Balkanization, this is what they meant.

Okay. All right. So here we go. Here. Where am I? Here. I don’t remember where I left off. When viewed in the current context, including the siege of Gaza, the Zionist plan for the Middle east bears an intimate relationship to the. Yeah, I said that. Greater Israel consists in an area extending from the Nile River. Okay, Gotcha. That’s good. A near century ago, the World Zionist Organization planned for a Jewish state included historic Palestine South Lebanon up to Sidon and Latani River, Syria’s Golan Heights, Hiron Plain and Dera, and control of the Hijaz railway from Dera to Aman, Jordan, as well as the Gulf of Akaba.

Now, the Gulf of Akaba is right here. Akaba right here. And the Gulf of Akaba is right. And I don’t know where all those places are, but it doesn’t really matter. Some Zionists wanted more land from the Nile in the west of the Euphrates in the Nile in the west to the Euphrates in the east, compromising Palestine, Lebanon, western Syria and southern Turkey. And if you look at the Israeli flag, the Israeli flag is a white flag with two blue stripes and the Star of David in the middle.

And the two blue stripes, the one stripe on the north is the Euphrates river and the one stripe to the south on the bottom is the Nile River. And that’s what the Israeli flag is meaning. That’s what it means. The Zionist project has supported the Jewish settlement movement. More broadly, it involves a policy of excluding Palestinians from Palestine, leading to the annexation of both the West bank and Gaza to the State of Israel.

The project of Greater Israel is to create a number of proxy states, which include parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, the Sinai, as well as parts of Iraq and Saudi Arabia. And see the map and this is what they’re talking about right here. According to Mahdi Darius Nazarai, in a 2011 Global Research article, the Yenon Plan was a continuation of Britain’s colonial design in the Middle East. The Yenon Plan is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority.

It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geopolitical environment through the Balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states, Israeli strategists viewed Iraq and as their biggest strategic challenge from an Arab state. This is why Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the Balkanization of the Middle east and the Arab world in Iraq. On the basis of the concepts of the Yinon Plan, Israeli strategists have called for the division of Iraq into a Kurdish state and two Arab states, one for Shi’I Muslims and the other for Sunni Muslims.

The first step towards establishing this was the war between Iraq and Iran, which the Yenon Plan discusses. And we’re going to be reading that. That’s coming. The Atlantic in 2008 and the US military’s armed Forces Journal in 2006 both published widely circulated maps that closely followed the outline of the Yenon Plan. Aside from a divided Iraq, which the Biden plan also calls for the Yenon plan calls for a divided Lebanon, Egypt, and Syria.

The partitioning of Iran, Turkey, Somalia, and Pakistan also fall into line with these views. The Yinon Plan also calls for dissolution in North Africa and forecasted as starting from Egypt and then spilling over into Sudan, Libya, and the rest of the region. Greater Israel would require the breaking up of the existing Arab states into small states. The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must one, become an imperial regional power and two, must affect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.

Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimization. This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme. The Yenon plan viewed in this context, U.

S. NATO led wars on Syria and Iraq are part of the process of Israeli territorial expansion. In this regard, the defeat of the US sponsored terrorists in ISIS and al Nusra by Syrian forces with the support of Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah’s constituent a significant setback for Israel or constitute a significant setback for Israel. Michael Judisky so that he wrote this in 2019. All right, here we go. The Zionist Plan for the Middle East Translated and edited by Israel Schnauk the Israel of Theodore Herzel, 19 Four and of Rabbi Fishman in 1947 in his Complete Diaries in volume Eleven, page 711, Theodore Herzel, the founder of Zionism, said that the area of the Jewish state stretches from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.

Rabbi Fishman, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the United Nations Special Committee on Inquiry on 9 July 4019 47 the Promised land extends from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates. It includes parts of Syria and Lebanon. Okay, here we go. Odid Yenon’s A strategy for Israel in the 1980s, published by the association of Arab American University Graduates, Incorporated Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982.

Introductory note by Dr. Khalil Nakle I hope I’m saying that right. The association of Arab American University graduates finds it compelling to inaugurate its new publication series, Special Documents, with Odid Yenon’s article, which appeared in Kivanim directions, the Journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization. Odid Yenon is an Israeli journalist who, and was formally attached to the Foreign Ministry of Israel to our knowledge, this document is the most explicit, detailed, and unambiguous statement to date of the Zionist strategy in the Middle East.

Furthermore, it stands as an accurate representation of the vision of the entire Middle east of the presently ruling Zionist regime of Beggan, Sharon, and Etan. I believe this is Manachembegun. Its importance hence lies not in its historical value but in the nightmare which it presents. The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must one, become an imperialistic regional power and two, must affect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.

Small here will depend on ethnic sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian based states become Israel’s satellite and, ironically, its source of moral legitimization. This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmentation of all Arab states into small units has been a recurrent theme. This theme has been documented on A very modest scale in the AAU G publication Israel’s Sacred Terrorism 1990, by Livia Rokash.

I hope I’m saying that Right. Based on the memoirs of Moshe Charett, a former Prime Minister of Israel, Rokasha studies documents in convincing detail the Zionist plan as it applies to Lebanon and as it was prepared in the mid fifty S. The first massive Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1978. Before this plan, out to the minuteest detail, the second and more barbaric and encompassing Israel invasion of Lebanon on June 6, 1982, aims to affect certain parts of this plan, which hopes to see not only Lebanon but Syria and Jordan as well, in fragments.

This ought to make mockery of Israeli public claims regarding their desire for a strong and independent Lebanese central government. More accurately, they want a Lebanese central government that sanctions their regional imperialist designs by signing a peace treaty with them. They also seek acquiescence in their design by the Syrian, Iraqi, Jordanian and other Arab governments, as well as the Palestinian people. What they want and what they are planning is not for an Arab world.

It’s not for an Arab world, but a world of Arab fragments that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony. Hence, Odid Yenon, in his essay A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s, talks about far reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967 that are created by the very stormy situation that surrounds Israel. The Zionist policy of displacing the Palestinians from Palestine is very much an active policy, but it is pursued more forcefully in times of conflict, such as in the 47 48 war and in the 1967 war.

An appendix entitled Israel Talks of a New Exodus is included in this publication to demonstrate past Zionist dispersals of Palestinians from their homeland and to show, besides the main Zionist document, we present other Zionist planning for the depalestanization of Palestine. It is clear from the Kivanyam, I’m probably saying that wrong document published in February 1982, that the far reaching opportunities of which Zionist strategists have been thinking are the same opportunities of which they are trying to convince the world in which they claim were generated by their June 1982 invasion.

It is also clear that the Palestinians were never the sole target of Zionist plans, but the priority target, since their viable and independent presence as a people negates the essence of the Zionist state. Every Arab state, however, especially those with cohesive and clear nationalistic directions, is a real target sooner or later. Contrasted with the detailed and unambiguous Zionist strategy elucidated in this document, Arab and Palestinian strategy unfortunately suffers from ambiguity and incoherence.

There is no indication that Arab strategists have internalized the Zionist plan in its full ramifications. Instead, they react with incredulously and shock whenever a new stage of it unfolds. This is apparent in Arab reaction, albeit muted, to the Israeli siege of Beirut. The sad fact is that as long as the Zionist strategy for the Middle east is not taken seriously, Arab reaction to any future siege of any other Arab capitals will be the same.

And this was by Khalil Nakle on July 23 of 1982. All right here so the forward by Israel Shah the following essay represents, in my opinion, the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime of Sharon and Etan, and I believe that’s Ariel Sharon for the Middle east, which is based on the division of the whole area into small states and the dissolution of the existing Arab states, I will comment on the military aspect of this plan in concluding.

Note here, I want to draw the attention of the readers to several important points. Number one, the idea that the all Arab states should be broken down by Israel into small units occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Zevshif, the military correspondent to Haratz and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel on this topic, writes about the best that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq, the dissolution of Iraq into a Shiite state and a Sunni state, and the separation of the Kurdish part.

Actually, this aspect of the plan is very old. The strong connection with neoconservative thought in the United States is very prominent, especially in the author’s notes. But while lip service is paid to the idea of the defense of the west from Soviet power. The real aim of the author and of the present Israeli establishment is clear, to make an imperial Israel into a world power. In other words, the aim of Sharon is to deceive the Americans after he has deceived all the rest.

It is obvious that much of the relevant data, both in notes and in the text, is garbled or omitted, such as the financial help of the United States to Israel. Much of it is pure fantasy. But the plan is not to be regarded as not as non influential or as not capable of realization for a short time. The plan follows faithfully the geopolitical ideas currently current in Germany of 1890 to 1933, which were swallowed whole by Hitler and the Nazi movement and determined their aims for Eastern Europe.

Those aims, especially the division of the existing states, were carried out in 1939 to 1941, and only an alliance of the global scale prevented their consolidation for a period of time. That’s interesting. I’m going to read that again just because I want to read it again and let it sink in, because that was really interesting. It is obvious that much of the relevant data, both in the notes and in the text, is garbled or omitted, such as the financial help of the United States to Israel.

Much of it is pure fantasy. But the plan is not to be regarded as noninfluential or as not capable of realization for a short time. The plan follows faithfully the geopolitical ideas current in Germany of 1890 to 1933, which were swallowed whole by Hitler and the Nazi movement and determined their aims for East Asia. Those aims, especially the division of the existing states, were carried out in 1939 to 41, and only an alliance of the global scale prevented their consolidation for a period of time.

Very interesting. The notes by the author followed the text under the title. To avoid confusion, I did not add any notes of my own, but have put the substance of them into this forward and concluding observations at the end. I have, however, emphasized some portions of the text. All right, I’m going to check here. Just kind of. I want to just see some of the stuff here. It looks like you guys are all chitchatting.

Um, da d. Okay, yeah. Yarn. That’s true. Let’s see. Did you see the MSM this week attacking the ideas of Trump? To attaching the ideas of Trump to Hitler. They are using this info as a hit piece against him. Interesting. I hadn’t seen that. I think when it comes to people like, we’re doing that inadvertently, we’ve all been lied to and just trying to find the truth. True.

All right, guys, so this is the Odin on a strategy for Israel in 1980s. This is the crux of the document, and I haven’t read this, so just so you guys know, I did not have an opportunity to read this. I wanted to, but the time did not permit it. So I’m reading it for the first time, and I think this is the reason that I find this very important, is I think this will shed a tremendous amount of light on what’s happening right now, because this is kind of the plan looking up here, specifically right here when it’s talked, that this plan follows faithfully.

The geopolitical idea is current in Germany of 1890 to 1933. And this includes. This is about the time when the Communists had kind of taken a foothold in Germany. What did Hitler do in 1934 when he got in there? He threw all the Communists out. So that’s what he did. They swallowed whole by Hitler because he threw them all. He threw all the Communists out. So that’s one reasons why I thought that was a pretty big deal, because that’s kind of what I’ve been saying for a long time.

At least I tend to believe that what the National Socialists were is they literally wanted to come in there and they wanted to kill communism. I’m not suggesting that fascism was a good strategy. I’m just saying that their primary fight was against communism anyway. And if you go back and you read, I’m drawing a blank. Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Soltenitsen. I mean, in there he says it clearly that it wasn’t a Russian revolution, it was an invasion.

It was a Bolshevik invasion, basically of communist Jews is what he said. That’s Alexander Solstanitson. Those are his words, not mine. All right, here. This essay originally appeared in Hebrew. A Journal for Judaism and Zionism, issue number 14, winter 5742, February 1982. All right, I’m not going to go through all that stuff. At the outset of the 1980s, the State of Israel is in need of a new perspective as to its place.

It aims and national targets at home and abroad. This need has become even more vital due to a number of central processes which the country, the region and the world are undergoing. We are living today in the early stages of a new epoch in human history which is not at all similar to its predecessor, and its characteristics are totally different from what we have hereto known. That is why we need an understanding of the central processes which typify this historical epoch on the one hand, and on the other hand, we need a world outlook and an operational strategy in accordance with the new conditions.

The existence, prosperity, and steadfastness of the Jewish state will depend upon its ability to adopt a new framework for its domestic and foreign affairs. This epoch is characterized by several traits which we can already diagnose and which symbolize a genuine revolution in our present lifestyle. The dominant process is the breakdown of the rationalist humanist outlook as the major cornerstone supporting the life and achievements of Western civilizations. Since the Renaissance, the political, social and economic views which have emanated from this foundation have been based on several truths which are presently disappearing.

For example, the view that man, as an individual, is the center of the universe and everything exists in order to fulfill his basic material needs. This position is being invalidated in the present when it has become clear that the amount of resources in the cosmos does not meet man’s requirements, his economic needs, or his demographic constraints. In a world in which there are 4 billion human beings and economic and energy resources which do not grow proportionally to meet the needs of mankind, it is unrealistic to expect to fulfill the main requirements of Western society, I.

E. The wish and aspiration for boundless consumption. The view that ethics play no part in determining the direction of man takes, but rather his material need needs do. That view is becoming prevalent today as we see a world in which nearly all values are disappearing. We are losing the ability to assess the simplest things, especially when they concern the simple question of what is good and what is evil.

The vision of man’s limitless aspirations and abilities shrinks in the face of the sad facts of life. When we witness the breakup of world order around us. The view which promises liberty and freedom to mankind seems absurd in the light of the sad fact that three fourths of the human race lives under totalitarian regimes. The views concerning equality and social justice have been transformed by socialism and especially by communism, into a laughingstock.

There is no argument as to the truth of these two ideas, but it is clear that they have not been put into practice properly. And the majority of mankind has lost the liberty, the freedom and the opportunity for equality and justice. Wow. There’s no argument as to the truth of these two ideas. Socialism and communism. There’s no argument as to the truth of these two ideas, but it’s clear that they have not been put into practice properly.

Damn. And the majority of mankind has lost the liberty, the freedom and the opportunity for equality and justice. It is the nuclear world in which we are still living in the relative peace for 30 years. The concept of peace and coexistence among nations has no meaning when a superpower like the USSR holds a military and political doctrine of the sort it has that not only it’s nuclear war possible, not only is nuclear war possible and necessary in order to achieve the ends of Marxism, but that it’s possible to survive after it, not to speak of the fact that one can be victorious in it.

The essential concepts of human society, especially those of the west, are undergoing a change due to political, military and economic transformations. Thus, the nuclear and conventional might of the USSR has transformed the epoch that has just ended into the last respite before the Great Saga that will demolish a large part of our world in a multidimensional global war, in comparison with which the past world wars have been mere child’s play.

The power of nuclear as well as of conventional weapons, their quantity, their precision and quality, will turn most of our world upside down within a few years. And we must align ourselves so as to face that in Israel. That is then the main threat to our existence and that of the Western world. The war over resources in the world, the Arab monopoly on oil and the need of the west to import most of its raw materials from the Third World are transforming the world as we know.

Given that one of the major aims of the USSR is to defeat the west by gaining control over the gigantic resources in the Persian Gulf and in the southern part of Africa, in which the majority of the world minerals are located, we can imagine the dimensions of global confrontation which will face us in the future. The Gorschev doctrine calls for the Soviet control of the oceans and the mineral rich areas of the Third World.

That together with the present Soviet nuclear doctrine, which holds that it is possible to manage, win and survive a nuclear war, in the course of which the West’s military might well be destroyed and its inhabitants made slaves. And the service of a Marxism Leninism is the main danger to world peace and to our own existence. Since 1967, the Soviets have transformed Klauschwitz dictum into war is the continuation of policy in nuclear means, and made it into the motto which guides all of their policies.

Already today they are busy carrying out their aims in our region and throughout the world, and the need to face them becomes the major element of our country’s security policy. And of course, at the rest of the free world, that is our major foreign challenge. And for some of you guys, you may or may not have ever seen the movie, what was it with Denzel Washington and Gene Hackman when they were on the submarine called Crimson Tide? And towards the kind of about a third of the way in the movie, they were all sitting around the table after they had just gone to sea.

And he says, war is a continuation by other means. Von Klauschwitz. And that was Gene Hackman saying that. And he turns to Denzel Washington and he that’s, that’s very good. But I think what Klauswitz meant was he said something about the true nature of war is to serve itself. And he says, but in the nuclear world, there can’t be a winner. And essentially, I think that’s kind of what he’s talking about here.

Basically, in the nuclear world, you can’t have a winner, because in the nuclear world, the only winner is war, or the true enemy in war is war itself. I think that’s what Denzel Washington was saying. But anyway, I digress. The Arab Muslim world, therefore, is not the major strategic problem which we shall face in the 80s, despite the fact that it carries the main threat against Israel due to its growing military might.

This world, with its ethnic minorities, its factions, and internal crises, which is astonishingly self destructive, as we see in Lebanon, in non Arab Iran, and also now in Syria, is unable to deal successfully with its fundamental problems and does not, therefore, constitute a real threat against the state of Israel in the long run, but only in the short run, where its immediate military power has great import. In the long run, the world will be unable to exist within its present framework in the areas around us without having to go through genuine revolutionary changes.

The Muslim Arab world is built like a contemporary, built like a temporary house of cards put together by foreigners, France and Britain in the 1920s, without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states and made of combinations of minorities and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another, so that every Arab Muslim state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within.

And in some, a civil war is already raging. Most of the Arabs, 118,000,000 out of 170,000,000, live in Africa, mostly in Egypt, 45 million today. Apart from Egypt, all of the Maghreb states are made up of a mixture of Arabs and Nonarb Berbers. In Algeria, there is already civil war raging in the Cabiot mountains between the two nations of the country. Morocco and Algeria are at war with each other over Spanish Sarhara.

In addition to the internal struggle in each of them, militant Islam endangers the integrity of Tunisia, and Gaddafi organizes wars which are destructive from the Arab point of view, from a country which is sparsely populated and which cannot become a powerful nation. This is why he has been attempting unifications in the past with the states that are more genuine. Like Egypt and Syria. Sudan, the most torn apart state in the Arab Muslim world today is built upon four groups hostile to each other.

An Arab Muslim Sunni minority which rules over a majority of non Arab Africans, Pagans and Christians. In Egypt, there is a Sunni Muslim majority facing a large minority of Christians which is dominant in Upper Egypt, some 7 million of them. So that even Sadat, in his speech on May eigth, expressed the fear that they will want a state of their own. Something like second Christian Lebanon in Egypt, all the Arab states east of Israel.

And by the way, Sadat, Anwar Sadat, he signed the Camp David Accords, I want to say in like 1978 or something like that. UltimatEly he was assassinated, for it was when Carter was president and he was assassinated because they viewed him signing a peace accord with Israel as basically just treason. All the Arab states east of Israel are torn apart, broken up and riddled with inner conflict, even more than those of the Maghreb Syria.

Syria is fundamentally no different from Lebanon except in the strong military regime which it rules or which rules it. But the real civil war taking place nowadays between the Sunni majority and the Shiite Alani ruling minority, a mere 12% of the population, testifies to the severity of the domestic trouble. Iraq is once again no different, in essence, from its neighbors. Although its majority is Shiite and the ruling minority Sunni, 65% of the population has no say in politics in which an elite of 20% holds the power.

In addition, there is a large Kurdish minority in the north. And if it weren’t for the strength of the ruling regime, the army of the oil revenues, Iraq’s future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past or of Syria today. The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today already, especially after the rise of Kameini to power in Iran, a leader whom the Shiites in Iraq view as their natural leader.

All of the Gulf principalities in Saudi Arabia are built upon a delicate house of sand in which there is only oil. In Kuwait, the Kuwaitis constitute only a quarter of the population. In Bahrain, the Shiites are the majority but are deprived of power. In the UAE, Shiites are once again the majority, but the Sunnis are in power. The same is true of Oman and North Yemen, even the Marxist South Yemen.

There is a sizable Shiite minority in Saudi Arabia. Half the population is foreign Egyptian and Yemenite, but a Saudi minority holds power. Jordan is in reality Palestinian, ruled by a transjordanian Bedouin minority. But most of the army and certainly the bureaucracy is now Palestinian. As a matter of fact, Aman is as Palestinian as Nablus. All of these countries have powerful armies, relatively speaking. But there is a problem there too.

The Syrian army today is mostly Sunni, with an Aloui officer corps, the Iraqi Army, Shiite, with Sunni commanders. This has great significance in the long run. And that is why it will not be possible to retain the loyalty of the army for a long time, except where it comes to the only common denominator, the hostility towards Israel. And today even that is insufficient. Alongside the Arabs, split as they are, the other Muslim states share a similar predicament.

Half of Iran’s population is comprised of a Persian speaking group and the other half of an ethnically Turkish group. Turkish population comprises Turkish Sunni Muslim majority, some 50%, and two large minorities, 12 million Shiite Alois and 6 million Sunni Kurds. In Afghanistan, there are 5 million Shiites, who constitute one third of the population. In Sunni Pakistan, there are 15 million Shiite who endanger the existence of that state.

This national ethnic minority picture, extending from Morocco to India and from Somalia to Turkey, points to the absence of stability in a rapid degeneration in the entire region. When this picture is added to the economic one, we see how the entire region is built like a house of cards, unable to withstand its severe problems. In this giant and fractured world, there are a few wealthy groups and a huge mass of poor people.

Most of the Arabs have an average yearly income of $300. That is the situation In Egypt. In most of the Maghreb countries, except for Libya and Iraq, Lebanon is torn apart and its economy is falling to pieces. It is a state in which there is no centralized power but only five de facto sovereign authorities. Christian in the north, supported by the Syrians and under the rule of the Franji clan in the east, an area of direct Syrian conquest.

In the center phalangest controlled Christian enclave in the south and up to the Latani River, a mostly Palestinian region controlled by the PLO and major hadads. State of Christians and half a million Shiites. Syria is an even graver situation, and even the assistance she will obtain in the future after the unification with Libya will not be sufficient for dealing with the basic problems of existence and the maintenance of a large army.

Egypt is in the worst situation. Millions are on the verge of hunger, half the labor force is unemployed, and housing is scarce. In this mostly densely populated area of the world, except for the army, there is not a single department operating efficiently, and the state is in a permanent state of bankruptcy and depends entirely on American foreign assistance granted. Since the peace. I’m assuming that when he talks about the peace, they’re talking about the peace after the Yam Kippur War in 1973.

In the Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, or could also be talking about the peace of the Camp David Accords. One or the other. In the Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, Libya and Egypt, is the largest accumulation of money and oil in the world. But those enjoying it are tiny elites who lack a wide base of support and self confidence, something that no army can guarantee. The Saudi army, with all its equipment, cannot defend the regime from real dangers at home or abroad.

And what took place in Mecca in 1980 is only an example. A sad and very stormy situation surrounds Israel and creates challenges for it. Problems, risks, but also far reaching opportunities. For the first time since 1967, chances are that opportunities missed at that time will become achievable in the an extent and along dimensions which we cannot even imagine today. The peace policy and return of territories through a dependence upon the US, precludes the realization of the new option created for us.

Since 1967, all of the governments of Israel have tied our national aims down to narrow political needs on the one hand, and on the other to destructive opinions at home which neutralize our capabilities, both at home and abroad. Failing to take steps towards the Arab population in the New Territories acquired in the course of a war forced upon us is the major strategic error committed by Israel on the morning after the Six Day War.

We could have saved ourselves all the bitter and dangerous conflict since then if we had given Jordan to the Palestinians who live west of the Jordan River. By doing that, we would have neutralized the Palestinian problem which we nowadays face, and to which we have found solutions that are really no solutions at all, such as territorial compromise or autonomy, which amount, in fact, to the same thing today.

We suddenly face immense opportunities for transforming the situation thoroughly. And this we must do in the coming decade. Otherwise we shall not survive as a state. In the course of the 1980s, the State of Israel will have to go through far reaching changes in its political and economic regime domestically, along with radical changes in its foreign policy, in order to stand up to the global and regional challenges of this new epoch.

The loss of the Suez Canal, oil fields, of the immense potential of the oil, gas and other natural resources on the Sinai Peninsula, which is geomorphologically God. I can’t say that identical to the rich oil producing countries in the region, will result in an energy drain in the near future and will destroy our domestic economy. One quarter of our present GNP, as well as one third of the budget is used for the purchase of oil.

The search for raw materials in the Negev and on the coast will not in the near future serve to alter the state of affairs. Regaining the Sinai Peninsula with its present and potential resources is therefore a political priority which is obstructed by the Camp David and the peace agreements. Yeah, they did not like that. The fault for that lies, of course, with the present Israeli government and the governments which paved the road to the policy of territorial compromise.

The Alignment government since 1967. The Egyptians will not need to keep the peace treaty after the return to the Sinai and they will do all they can to return to the fold of the Arab world and to the USSR in order to gain support and the military assistance. American aid is guaranteed only for a short while, for the terms of the peace and the weakening of the US both at home and abroad, will bring about a reduction in aid without oil and the income from it.

With the present enormous expenditure, we will not be able to get through 1982 under the present conditions. And we will have to act in order to return the situation to the status quo which existed in the Sinai prior to Sadat’s visit and the mistaken peace agreement signed with him in March of 79. And that’s the Camp David Accords. Clearly this guy is not a fan of the St.

Camp David Accords at all. Israel has two major routes through which to realize this purpose. Once one direct and the other indirect. The direct option is the less realistic one because of the nature of the regime and government in Israel, as well as the wisdom of Sadat, who obtained our withdrawal from the Sinai, which was next to the War of 1973, his major achievement since he took power.

Israel will not unilaterally break the treaty, neither today nor in 1982, unless it is very hard pressed economically and politically. And Egypt provides Israel with the excuse to take the Sinai back into our hands for the fourth time in our short history. What is left, therefore, is the indirect option. The economic situation in Egypt, the nature of the regime and its pan Arab policy will bring about a situation after April of 1982 in which Israel will be forced to act directly or indirectly in order to regain control over Sinai as a strategic, economic and energy reserve.

For the long run, Egypt does not constitute a military or strategic problem due to its internal conflicts. And it could be driven back to a post 1967 war situation with no more than one day. Prior to 1967, Egypt was a pretty big military power. But after the first situation in the 1967 war, on day one they literally caught the entire Egyptian Air force on the ground and they destroyed it all at once, all in one fell swoop in just one day.

And basically what they did was by destroying the Egyptian Air force, the ground forces had no air cover and their ground troops were basically, I mean, they were dismantled by the Israeli Air force. Just a little context there for you. The myth of Egypt as the strong leader of the Arab world was demolished back in 1956 and definitely did not survive 1967. But our policy as the return of the Sinai served to turn the myth into fact.

In reality, however, Egypt’s power is proportioned both to Israel alone and to the rest of the Arab world. Has gone down about 50% since 1967. Egypt is no longer the leading political power in the Arab world and is economically on the verge of a crisis without foreign assistance. The crisis will come tomorrow. In the short run, due to the return of the Sinai, Egypt will gain several advantages at our expense, but only in the short run until 1982.

And that will not change the balance of power to its benefit and will possibly bring about its downfall. Egypt is in the present domestic political picture, is already a corpse, and all the more so if we take into account the growing Muslim Christian rift. Breaking Egypt down territorially into distinct geographical regions is the political aim of Israel in the 1980s. On its Western front, Egypt is divided and torn apart into many Fochi of.

I don’t hope I’m saying that right of authority. If Egypt falls apart, countries like Libya, Sudan or even the more distant states will not continue to exist in their present form and will join the downfall and dissolution of Egypt. The vision of a Christian Coptic state in Upper Egypt, alongside a number of weak states with very localized power and without a centralized government as to date, is the key historical development, which was only set back by the peace agreement, but which seems inevitable in the long run.

I’m going to pause it there for a second. I just want to check the chat and see. Abe is obviously dominating the chat. Good Lord, have mercy. Okay, you guys are talking scripture, so clearly, I don’t think you really care what I’m saying, okay? But I’m going to continue on because there’s going to be people who watch this later who are going to want to know. So the Western Front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern Front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently.

Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world, including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian Peninsula, and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern Front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power on those states serves as the primary short term target.

Syria will fall apart in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure into several states, such as in present day Lebanon. So there will be a Shiite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, and another Sunni state in Damascus, hostile to its northern neighbor and the Druzes, who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan and certainly in the Haran and in northern Jordan.

The state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today. Iraq, which rich in oil on the one hand and intentionally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s target. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria in the short run, it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel.

An Iraqi Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of interarab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations, as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic religious lines, as in Syria during Otoman times, is possible.

So three or more states will exist around three major cities, Basra, Baghdad, and Mosul, and Shiite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization. The entire Arabian Peninsula is a natural candidate for dissolution due to the internal and external pressures, and the matter is inevitable, especially in Saudi Arabia. Regardless of whether its economic might based on oil remains intact or whether it is diminished in the long run, the internal rifts and breakdowns are a clear natural development in light of the present political structure, Jordan constitutes an immediate strategic target in the short run, but not in the long run, for it does not constitute a real threat in the long run.

After its dissolution, the termination of the lengthy rule of King Hussein, and the transfer of power to the Palestinians in the short run, there is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel’s policy, both in war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the transfer of power from the Palestinian majority.

Changing the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem in the river is obviously the Jordan river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic demographic freezed in them. Are there guarantees for the coming change in both banks of the river and ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the near future? In the nearest future.

I think I read that wrong. Are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river. I think that’s written incorrectly. The autonomy plan ought to be rejected as well as any compromise or division of the territories. For given the plans of the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefamar Plan of September 1980 is not possible to go on living in this country and the present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west of the river.

Genuine coexistence and peace will reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan and the sea, they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own. And security will be theirs only in Jordan. Within Israel, the distinction between the areas of 67 and the territories beyond them, those of 48, has always been meaningless for Arabs and nowadays no longer has any significance for us.

The problem should be seen in its entirety, without any divisions. As of 1967, it should be clear under any future political situation or military constellation that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the existence of Israel and secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it as our existential need. In this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall soon enter, it is no longer possible to live three fourths of the Jewish population on the dense shoreline which is so dangerous in a nuclear epoch.

Dispersal of the population is therefore a domestic strategic aim of the highest order. Otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders. Judea, Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for national existence. And if we do not become the majority in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the country. And we shall be like the crusaders who lost this country which was not theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to begin with.

Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic Consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews. Today, realizing our aims on the Eastern Front depends first on the realization of this eternal strategic objective. The transformation of the political and economic structure as so to enable the realization of these strategic aims is the key to achieving the entire change.

We need to change from a centralized economy in which the government is extensively involved, to an open and free market, as well as to switch from depending upon us taxpayers to developing our own hands of genuine productive economic infrastructure. If we are not able to make this change freely and voluntarily, we shall be forced into by world developments, especially in the areas of economics, energy and politics, and by our own growing isolation.

I think what he’s talking about here is clearly what was talked about in that book by Bernstein, which is we need to change from a centralized economy, which the government is extensively involved, to an open and free market. And Bernstein himself said that it was basically a communist state. So I don’t know if they actually made that change or not. But clearly it’s stated in here that’s what he wanted to do.

From a military and strategic point of view, the west, led by the United States, is unable to withstand the global pressures of the USSR throughout the world. And Israel must therefore stand alone in the 80s without any foreign assistance, military or economic. And this is within our capacities today. With no compromises. Rapid changes in the world will also bring about a change in the condition of the world Jewry, to which Israel will become not only a last resort, but the only existential option.

We cannot assume that us Jews and the communities of Europe and Latin America will continue to exist in their present form in the future. Our existence in this country itself is certain. There is no force that could remove us from here, either forcefully or treachery. Sadat’s method, despite the difficulties of the mistaken peace policy and the problem of the Israeli Arabs and those of the territories, we can effectively deal with these problems in the foreseeable.

That’s the plan. That’s this guy’s plan. And talking about how the strategy for Israel in the 80s about how what they wanted to do is they really were planning on the entire Arab world basically balkanizing and breaking up because of all of the problems in each country. And he went through every country and cited what their problems were and why they were going to collapse. Clearly a lot of that stuff didn’t happen because this is from the early.

If you look at a lot of that stuff, it didn’t happen. But one of the things that did happen was that when the United States went into Saudi Arabia in 1990, it kind of rendered a lot of this stuff moot. But in 1990, I think what they were looking to do is a lot of people forget this. But Bush promised that if the Kurds stood up against Saddam Hussein that they would provide the military assistance.

Well, they did, the Kurds did, and then the United States with reneged on the military assistance, and Saddam Hussein and his military went in and crushed the Kurdish opposition. So in a way, they kind of backstabbed the Israelis if that’s what they were trying to do, as my memory recalls. All right, concluding observations. Three important points have to be clarified in order to be able to understand the significant possibilities of realizations of this Zionist plan for the Middle east and also why it had to be published.

Number one, the military background of the plan. The military conditions of this plan have not been mentioned above, but on the many occasions where something very like it being explained in closed meetings to members of the Israeli establishment, this point is clarified. It is assumed that the Israeli military forces and all their branches are insufficient for the actual work of occupation of such wide territories as discussed above.

In fact, even in times of intense Palestinian unrest on the west bAnk, the forces of the Israeli army are stretched out too much. The answer to that is the method of ruling by means of hadat forces or of village associations, also known as village leagues. Local forces under leaders completely disassociated from the population, not having even any feudal or party structure, such as the Fallangeists have, for example.

I hope I’m saying that right. I don’t know if I am. The states proposed by the Yenon are Hadad Land and village associations, and their armed forces will be no doubt quite similar. In addition, Israeli military superiority in such a situation will be much greater than it is even now, so that any movement of revolt will be punished either by mass humiliation, as in the West bank and Gaza Strip, or by bombardment and obliteration of cities, as in Lebanon now in June 1982, or by both.

In order to ensure this, the plan, as explained orally, calls for the establishment of Israeli garrisons in focal places between the many states equipped with necessary mobile destructive forces. In fact, we have seen something like this in Hadadland, and we will almost certainly soon see the first examples of this system functioning in either South Lebanon or all of Lebanon. What is Hadadland? I don’t know what that is.

I’m curious. Doesn’t have no, doesn’t say so. I don’t know where they’re talking about what they say. Hadadland. It is obvious that the above military assumptions and the whole plan to if somebody knows where Hadadland is. Please let me know in the comments, because I’m curious. Depend on the Arabs continuing to be even more divided than they are now, and the lack of any truly progressive mass movement among them.

It may be that those two conditions will be removed only when the plan will be well advanced, with consequences which cannot be foreseen. Why is it necessary to publish this in Israel? The reason for the publication is the dual nature of the Israeli Jewish society, a very great measure of freedom and democracy, especially for Jews, combined with expansionism and racist discrimination. In such a situation, the Israeli Jewish elite, for the masses follow the TV and begging, speechless, has to be persuaded.

The first steps in the process of persuasion are oral, as indicated above, but a time comes in which it becomes inconvenient. Written material must be produced for the benefit of the more stupid persuaders and explainers, for example, medium rank officers who are usually remarkably stupid. They then learn it more or less, and preach it to others. It should be remarked that Israel, even the Yejav Yishu from the 20s, has always functioned in this way.

I myself remember how before I was in opposition, the necessity of war was explained to me and others a year before the 1956 war, and the necessity of conquering the rest of Western Palestine when we have the opportunity, was explained in the year 65 to 67. Why was it assumed that there is no special risk from the outside in the publication of such plans? Such risk can come from two sources, so long as the principled opposition inside Israel is very weak, a situation which may change as a consequence of the war on Lebanon, the Arab world, including the Palestinians and the United States.

The Arab world has shown itself so far quite incapable of a detailed, rational analysis of Israeli Jewish society, and the Palestinians have been on the verge, no better than the rest. In such a situation. Even those who are shouting about the dangers of Israeli expansionism, which are real enough, are doing this not because of factual and detailed knowledge, but because of belief in myth. A good example is the very persistent belief in the non existent writing of the wall of the Knesset, of the biblical verse about the Nile and the Euphrates.

Another example is the persistent and completely false declarations which were made by some of the most important Arab leaders, that the two blue stripes of the Israeli flag symbolize the Nile and the Euphrates, while in fact they are taken from the stripes of the Jewish praying shawl. Okay, maybe I’m wrong there. Learn something. The Israeli specialists assume that on the whole, the Arabs will pay no attention to their serious discussions of the future and the Lebanon war has proved them right.

So why should they not continue their old methods of persuading other Israelis? In the United States, a very similar situation exists, at least until now. The more or less serious commentators take their information about Israel and much of their opinions about it from two sources. The first is from the articles in the liberal American press, which almost totally by Jewish admirers of Israel, who, even if they are critical of some aspects of the Israeli state, practice loyally what Stalin used to call the constructive criticism.

In fact, those among them who claim also to be anti Stalinist are in reality more Stalinist than Stalin. With Israel being their God, which has not yet failed in the framework of such critical worship, it must be assumed that Israel has always good intentions and only makes mistakes, and therefore such a plan would not be a matter for discussion. Exactly as the biblical genocides committed by Jews are not mentioned the other sources of information, the Jerusalem Post, has similar policies.

So long, therefore, as the situation exists in which Israel is really a closed society to the rest of the world, because the world wants to close its eyes, the publication and even the beginning of the realization of such a plan is realistic and feasible. This was by Israel Shaq, who is the translator. Israel Shaq is a professor of organic chemistry at Hebrew University in Jerusalem and the chairman of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights.

He published the Shakaq Papers, collections and key articles from the Hebrew Press, and is the author of numerous articles and books, among them non Jew in the Jewish state. His latest book is Israel’s Global Role Weapons for repression, published by the AAUG in 1982. So I’m not going to go down the notes, and there’s quite a bit of notes in there, and I just copied it and pasted the whole thing into the document so that I could read it without all of the stuff.

But there’s one other thing that I wanted to show here. In fact, I’m just going to go and let you guys see me do it. Actually, I’ll just go to bit. I’m just going to go to bitchute and look it up. Because it was the Odinon. There was one that I wanted to play that I thought was actually a pretty good. I think it was this one right here.

Know your enemy about eleven minutes long. The whole thing, the whole Greater Israel plan, it operates on two essential things. To survive, Israel must become the imperial regional power, and it must affect the division of the entire area around it into smaller states. They stir up sectarian hatred, they divide the whole place into smaller states, and then all these small. The whole thing, the whole Greater Israel plan, it operates on two essential things.

To survive, Israel must become the imperial regional power, and it must affect the division of the entire area around it into smaller states. They stir up sectarian hatred. They divide the whole place into smaller states. And then all these smaller states are fighting each other. And so that kind of legitimizes Israel’s existence because it appears to be the only stable force in the area when it’s the one who’s gone and destabilized the whole thing.

And what Chris said about the two stripes on the flag, this is exactly right. The Nile and the Euphrates. This is the plan for Greater Israel. And it includes Syria, it includes Jordan. It includes the top of Saudi Arabia, half of Iraq, parts of Lebanon. This has been the plan for the whole time. And this is why they’ve gone in there and done things the way they have.

It’s all part of the greater Israel project. And even there was another document that was called Israel’s sacred Terrorism. It was written by a man called Olivia Rakash, and it’s based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharrett, former Prime Minister of Israel. And it basically outlines the 1978 invasion of Lebanon to a T. It’s exactly what they did. And it’s kind of a smaller, condensed version of this Yinon plan.

And the Yinon Plan was also outlined by way back, as far as Theodore Hersal. I mean, this has been going on for a long time. This scenario is borne out by none other than Prime Minister David Bengurian, one of the great founders of Israel, recorded in an astonishing article in look magazine. Benghurian predicted that a one world system presided over by Jerusalem will be set up in the near future.

All continents will become united in a World alliance at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished and there will be no more war in Jerusalem. The United Nations, a truly United nations, will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the Federated Union of All continents. This will be the seat of the Supreme Court of mankind to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.

What we’re dealing with here, look, when you look at the whole Khazar Empire, that’s who these people are. They’re Khazars and they’ve basically hijacked everything. They’ve infiltrated into Christianity, they’ve infiltrated into Judaism, they’ve probably even infiltrated into Islam, infiltrated into everything. This is why you’ve got Christian Zionists, you’ve got Jewish Zionists. You’ve got this whole sort of mottled empire that’s sort of all over the world. It’s infiltrated everywhere.

And they’re using basically what’s outlined, the supremacist ideology that’s outlined in the Jewish faith. They’re using this to construct their new world Order. And these people believe they’re the chosen people. These khazars are more zealous about following these ideologies than the actual Jews are. But none of them actually believe in God. They’re creating this whole tense situation everywhere to break everything up, to collapse everything, collapse all the economies, collapse Europe, collapse Russia, collapse everything, and create this empire of chaos with this one bastion of control in the middle, which will be greater Israel.

That’s the plan, but it’s run by the Khazars. And I would suggest that even the British royal family are probably related to these Khazars in some way. I mean, it all seems to go back to this empire. All the research that I’ve done over the years, going back through Hebrew lines and going back looking at what happened in Egypt and so many things. This Khazar history is the most hidden history and the most repressed history anywhere.

It’s all about merging all of the races on the planet together. This is why we’ve got such an infiltration of foreign races into Europe at the moment, which is all being run by Jewish advisors to all of these countries. And it’s weird, you say to stuff. You’re blaming the Jews for everything. You’re anti Semitic. Well, hang on. I’m just looking at the situation and you look and you go, these people, they just happen to all be Jews.

Is this a coincidence? And then you look at the Greater Israel plan and you look at the whole doctrine of the Jews as God’s chosen, and Goyam and you say, well, here it all is, Cece, he’s serving British and Israeli interests like till T. He’s doing just as bad, even more damage to Gaza than Israel because these are Arab brothers. These should be supporting these people. And he’s closed all the borders off, like you say, he’s bulldozed all those homes.

He’s actually even thinking of digging a moat, as I was saying before, along the. So they can’t possibly dig any tunnels because they’d have the weight of water above them. There’s no way they’d be able to do any smugglers tunnels. I’m going to pause that. That’s not the video that I was looking for. And that’s not the one that I saw earlier. Not only that, but that’s not really the Odin union plan that you’re talking about.

The one that I saw earlier was it was a much better quality and it was different, and it didn’t have Max Eigen on there. To me, what that looks like is it looks like it’s a clip. It looks like it’s a clip from part nine or ten of Europa. That’s what it reminds me of. That’s true. A lot of that stuff that Max IGN was saying, it’s not wrong, but whatever.

At the very minimum, obviously, the greater Israel Project and the plan about the destabilization of the. That’s what they wanted. And I don’t know if what’s going on right now is that I tend to think that what’s happening right now is just a furtherance of what they couldn’t. The war situation in Ukraine failed. Now they need another war because they’ve got to find a way to get more money.

They’re running out of options, and they need a war to conceal their crimes of. Basically, the monetary system that has been perpetrated on the world is failing. It’s coming apart at the seams. Especially the people in the Western world are slowly becoming to learn that their money is worthless and it’s going to be worthless. People are going to lose their pensions. I mean, all this stuff. And so the only way to really get out from everybody understanding all this, is to take everybody to war.

To have a war, have a world war, wherever, if it’s nuclear or whatever, that’s caused chaos in the United States. That’s what they want. They want chaos because when there’s chaos and then people, a whole bunch of people die, you go back and you look at the Deagle numbers that they had in 2015, where they talked about the population of the United States was going to be under 100 million people.

It’s like, I mean, that’s what they want. They want us dead. If you have trillions of dollars in unfunded liabilities and unfunded liabilities being like Social Security and welfare and all these things that are owed to people because they essentially robbed our tax, they robbed our money, they took the Social Security money, and they spent it other places instead of having it for pensions. And then they took the money from the 401 and all the people that have put it in their retirement funds, and then they gambled it away, and now it’s not there anymore.

It’s like all these criminals in the banking industry and the government and everywhere else. Once the people realize that everything that they’ve worked for has been a lie, the easiest way for these people that have all the money, the easiest way for them not to have to pay it is if you no longer in existence. To me, that kind of sounds pretty simplistic. It’s a simplistic way of saying it, but I mean, it’s kind of true.

Look at what they did. Let’s analyze real quick and I’ll end with this, but let’s analyze what happened during COVID when they shut everybody down in COVID, who was the only place that couldn’t refuse patients was the old folks homes. So you literally put sick patients into old folks homes. You put them in there with, you took people who were sick and you put them into a facility with other people who had the lowest ability to fight off infection.

And that’s where they went. They were unable to say no. They couldn’t say no. That was what they did. And how many old people died as a result of they were isolated from their families. Their immune systems are already compromised because they’re older. And I mean, they, I mean, I mean, imagine what’s going to happen when people, when people who are defending all this realized that it was realized that their parents and grandparents were taken away from them.

Imagine what’s going to happen when they figure this out. You would think that they would have figured it out by now, but there’s still people out there who still probably haven’t figured it out. So imagine what’s going to happen anyway. I don’t know. I don’t have an answer for. I don’t have answer. I analyze stuff as I see it. I put pieces to the puzzle together and I say, wow, this kind of fits here.

This fits here. But do I have the answer? No, I don’t know what’s going to happen. I look at things as they’re happening now and I’m like, wow, that just kind of sounds crazy, but I don’t know. It’s going to be very interesting to see what happens. It’s very interesting to see what happens. Yeah. Euthanasia on mass scale. Exactly, Colin. That’s kind of how I see that’s what the vax was supposed to do.

And a lot of you guys are probably newer to my channel and didn’t realize that. I interviewed the Pfizer whistleblower and I interviewed that with a couple of people who are very familiar with the manufacturing process and whatnot. The Pfizer whistleblower was Melissa McAtee. And if you go back in the catalog of my videos back, and I want to say it was about a year ago, and I interviewed her, and I don’t say this in a braggadocious way at all, but she told me after the fact, she said, of all the people that interviewed me, she said, you were my favorite because you guys asked me real questions that were in my wheelhouse.

Everybody else wanted to ask her questions about science and stuff like that. And we talked to her. It was me and two other people, and it was a little bit of a roundtable. It was a grilling, but we all understood manufacturing and asked her questions that were really relevant to the things that she knew and she could answer. And she told me after the fact, she said that you were my favorite interview.

So I can’t suggest in stronger terms to go find that interview. In fact, I’ll actually go hunt it down and I’ll put it in the description. I’ll put it in the description. So if you guys want to watch it, you can watch it. What she said was that basically, the vaccine, there’s no way in hell that they could have mass produced the vaccine in the numbers that they did.

It had to have already been mass produced, had to have been warp speed, wasn’t about producing the vaccine. The vaccine was already ready. All she did was all she did on the line, and it was a violation of good manufacturing practices from top to bottom with good manufacturing practices. For layman’s terms, if you’re making chocolate chip cookies, right, you have to put down the flour. You put down the lot number, the expiration date of the flour that you used.

You put down how much you used, you put it in the ingredient, then you go, and then you add the sugar, and you do the same thing. And then it’s all in the order of ingredients. And everything is laid out. How much you used, what the lot number were, what the lot numbers were, how much of it was, where in the process was everything. All that stuff is put into a lot number.

And so if you have a lot number that you get sick or something, and they put that lot number in a database, and then all of a sudden, they go back and they find two or three other people who got sick, and they got sick from the same lot number, then what do they could do? They can pull that lot number. That’s how they identify things. Well, what they did on the line when they were producing the vaccine was they didn’t do any of that.

All the ingredients were already pre prepared, and it was just an assembly line. They just put A and B together and that’s it. And a lot of the things that she said were just. I mean, they were, they were horrifying. But anyway, that’s an interview on my channel from, from about, actually about a year and a half ago. I think it was like April of 22 when we did that interview.

Anyway, suggest you guys go watch that if you want to. Anyway. All right, guys, it’s about 715 for me and we’re coming up on 2 hours, so been a long day, and I’ve got another long day tomorrow and an even longer day on Thursday. But I will be back tomorrow night to do something. So I hope you all have a very good evening. I appreciate your time for showing up.

And I know reading some of that today kind of sound a little bit boring, but to me it was fascinating. I learned a few things today. I didn’t even know about what this thing was until earlier today, so I’m glad I took the time to read it. When I read stuff like this, to me, basically, it’s like me doing research and you guys getting to watch me do the research.

I’m learning the same time you guys are. And I pause it quick from point to point to interject a few things just to kind of give some context. Anyway, appreciate everybody. Hope you all have a great evening. And I will be back. So you all have a great night. Thanks for tuning in. Appreciate you all each. .